Acquisition Regulation: Access to and Ownership of Records, 28772-28776 [2010-12404]
Download as PDF
28772
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
CACs were not adequately accounted for
after contract performance.
The Councils are proposing to amend
the FAR by inserting new paragraphs
(d)(1) and (2) under section 4.1301,
Policy. Paragraph (d)(1) will provide
policy on recovering PIVs. The text in
paragraph (d)(1) states that agency
procedures shall ensure that
Government contractors account for all
forms of Government-provided
identification issued to Government
contractors under a contract, and return
such identification to the issuing agency
at the earliest of any of the following,
unless otherwise determined by the
agency: when no longer needed for
contract performance; upon completion
of a contractor employee’s employment;
upon contract completion or
termination. The text in paragraph (d)(2)
states that the contracting officer may
delay final payment under a contract if
the contractor fails to comply with these
requirements.
The Councils are also proposing to
modify FAR clause 52.204–9, Personal
Identity Verification of Contractor
Personnel to be consistent with Part 4.
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under Section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Councils do not expect this
proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
requirements of the actions required and
the clause are not significantly
burdensome. Currently, it is a common
business practice to have procedures in
place to revoke/return access cards
when no longer in use by the contractor.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis has, therefore, not been
performed. We invite comments from
small businesses and other interested
parties. The Councils will consider
comments from small entities
concerning the affected FAR Parts 4 and
52 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610.
Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. (FAR case 2009–027),
in correspondence.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the proposed changes
to the FAR do not impose information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:33 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4 and
52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 17, 2010.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 4 and
52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 4 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
AUTHORITY: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
2. Amend section 4.1301 by adding
paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) to read as
follows:
4.1301
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Agency procedures shall ensure
that Government contractors account for
all forms of Government-provided
identification issued to Government
contractors under a contract, i.e., the
Personal Identity Verification (PIV)
cards or other similar badges, and shall
ensure that contractors return such
identification to the issuing agency as
soon as any of the following occurs,
unless otherwise determined by the
agency:
(i) When no longer needed for
contract performance.
(ii) Upon completion of a contractor
employee’s employment.
(iii) Upon contract completion or
termination.
(2) The contracting officer may delay
final payment under a contract if the
contractor fails to comply with these
requirements.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Amend section 52.204–9 by:
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Redesignating paragraph (b) as
paragraph (d), and adding new
paragraphs (b) and (c); and revising the
newly designated paragraph (d).
The added and revised text reads as
follows:
52.204–9 Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel.
*
*
*
*
*
PERSONAL IDENTITY VERIFICATION OF
CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (DATE)
(b) The Contractor shall account for
all forms of Government-provided
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
identification issued to the Contractor
under this contract. The contractor shall
return such identification to the issuing
agency at the earliest of any of the
following, unless otherwise determined
by the Government:
(1) When no longer needed for
contract performance.
(2) Upon completion of the Contractor
employee’s employment.
(3) Upon contract completion or
termination.
(c) The contracting officer may delay
final payment under a contract if the
contractor fails to comply with these
requirements.
(d) The Contractor shall insert the
substance of this clause, including this
paragraph (d), in all subcontracts when
the subcontractor is required to have
routine physical access to a Federallycontrolled facility and/or routine access
to a Federally-controlled information
system.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2010–12334 Filed 5–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
48 CFR Parts 904, 952 and 970
RIN 1991–AB85
Acquisition Regulation: Access to and
Ownership of Records
Department of Energy.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) is proposing to amend the
Department of Energy Acquisition
Regulation (DEAR) to revise the
applicability and the policies and
procedures involving the access to and
ownership of records. Much work at
DOE facilities is performed by
contractor and subcontractor personnel
and involves hazardous materials or the
possibility of exposure to radioactive
materials. It is necessary for the
contractors and subcontractors to
maintain extensive records for the
Government involving these workers
and processes, in particular, personnel;
facility; occupational safety and health;
environment; and medical records. DOE
is proposing to amend these clauses for
consistent inclusion in all applicable
contracts, not just management and
operating (M&O) contracts, based on the
type of work being performed, to ensure
preservation and Government
ownership of records. Additionally, the
proposed revisions address
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
inconsistencies relating to DOE
contractor and subcontractor efforts in
managing records in accordance with
DOE retention requirements. The
proposed revisions are being made to
establish consistent records
maintenance, retention, and disposal;
and to ensure certain records generated
on groups of individuals in the
performance of the contract are
maintained as DOE Privacy Act Systems
of Records.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed rulemaking must be received
on or before close of business June 23,
2010.
ADDRESSES: This proposed rule is
available and comments may be
submitted to the Federal Electronic
Rulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments may
also be submitted electronically to
Richard.Langston@hq.doe.gov
Comments may be mailed to: Richard
Langston, Procurement Policy Analyst;
MA–61; U. S. Department of Energy;
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.;
Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Langston at 202–287–1339 or
Richard.Langston@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under Executive Order 12988
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act
E. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
J. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
of Energy
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
The Access to and Ownership of
Records clause, at 48 CFR 970.5204–3,
raises a number of concerns, including
the lack of inclusion of the clause in
non-M&O contracts; records systems
identified as contractor-owned may not
be operated and records may not be
maintained appropriately as Privacy Act
Systems of Records and for the required
retention period; and the need for the
Government to maintain personnel;
facility; occupational safety and health;
environment; and medical records on
contractors and subcontractors long-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:33 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
term based on NARA-approved DOE
Records Disposition Schedules and to
support the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Compensation
Program Act (EEOICPA), the DOE
Former Worker Medical Screening
Program (FWP) and other records
requests.
In light of the fact that most of the
DOE sites have been in existence for as
many as 60 years, there are inherent
variations in quality, complexity, and
completeness of recordkeeping
practices. While DOE cannot recreate
records that no longer exist, it is vital
that DOE preserve ownership of, and
access to, records in accordance with
laws and regulations. In particular
preservation of records that are vital to
the safety, health and well being of past,
present and future workers and the
surrounding communities.
The proposed revisions address
inclusion of the clause in all applicable
contracts, not just M&O contracts, based
on the type of work being performed,
provides clarity to the DOE contractor
and subcontractor on their records
management responsibilities, in
particular the maintenance, retention,
disposition, and Government ownership
of records [see 44 U.S.C. chapters 21, 29,
31, 33, and 35, and 36 CFR chapter 12,
subchapter B], including operating and
maintaining records as DOE Privacy Act
Systems of Records [FAR 52–224–2];
ensures preservation and ownership of
personnel, facility; occupational safety
and health, environment, medical
records [see 10 CFR part 850, 10 CFR
part 851, 29 CFR part 1904, and 29 CFR
part 1910] and facility records required
for decision-making and in support of
the administration of the EEOICPA
allows for DOE to identify and contact
individuals in the future for
participation in the FWP; and to meet
other future records requests.
These revisions will also serve to
stress the importance of complete and
accurate documentation and proper
recordkeeping to adequately document
Government funded activities, preserve
institutional memory, protect the legal
and financial rights of the Government,
and preserve worker and facility records
to ensure records are available to the
Government when needed.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
The Department proposes to amend
the DEAR as follows.
1. Subpart 904.7—The clause
applicability specification for Contractor
Records Retention at 904.702 has been
revised to update the name of the
Integration of Environment, Safety and
Health into Work Planning and
Execution clause, delete the reference to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28773
the obsolete Nuclear Safety clause, add
a requirement to include the Access to
and Ownership of Records clause, and
specifically reference the ‘‘DOE Records
Disposition Schedules’’ in applicable
DOE Directives. These changes are being
made to ensure that all contracts that
generate records include the
requirements of the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause to ensure
Government ownership and access to
these records and to establish consistent
records management practices in the
retention of records.
2. Section 952.223–75—DOE added
language to the preservation of
individual occupational radiation
exposure records that requires such
records be operated and maintained by
contractors as a DOE Privacy Act
Systems of Records (i.e., as DOE–35
Personnel Radiation Exposure Records)
and emphasizes the requirement to
maintain these records in accordance
with the NARA-approved DOE Records
Disposition Schedules.
3. Section 970.0407–1–3—The
prescription of the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause has been
expanded to require inclusion in more
than just M&O contracts, but must also
be included in contracts that contain the
Integration of Environment, Safety, and
Health into Work Planning and
Execution clause at 48 CFR 952.223–71,
and the Radiation Protection and
Nuclear Criticality clause at 48 CFR
952.223–72. This change is made to
ensure that the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause is
included consistently in all applicable
contracts based on the type of work
being performed (e.g., work that exposes
personnel to hazardous material,
radiation or long-term health issues),
not just M&O contracts. In addition, the
FAR Privacy Act clause at 48 CFR
52.224–2 must also be included in all
contracts that include the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause as records
systems are to be operated, and records
generated on groups of individuals in
the performance of the contract are to be
maintained by the contractor as a DOE
Privacy Act Systems of Records.
4. Section 970.5204–3(a)—Language
was added to require contractors to
operate and maintain certain records
classified as Government-owned records
as DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records
as determined by the Contracting
Officer. The Contracting Officer will
tailor the list of Government-owned
records to be operated and maintained
by the contractor as Privacy Act Systems
of Records using DOE’s most recent
compilation of the Privacy Act Systems
of Records (see 74 FR 994, January 9,
2009).
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
28774
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
5. Section 970.5204–3(b)(1)—The
words ‘‘non-contract related’’ were
added before the words ‘‘medical/
health-related records’’ to make it clear
that those personnel medical records
that are not collected by the contractor
in the direct performance of its contract
(i.e., corporate wellness programs) could
be considered separate and distinct from
contract-related personnel medical
records.
6. Section 970.5204–3(b)(2)—The
words ‘‘internal corporate governance
records’’ was added to the list of
confidential contractor financial
information to make it clear that these
types of records should be considered to
be confidential contractor records.
7. Section 970.5204–3(c)—Language
was added to clarify the disposition of
both Government-owned and
contractor-owned records at contract
completion or termination. An option
was added to allow contractors to
deliver ‘‘original’’ records to the
Government in lieu of copying these
records with assurance that the
contractor will have rights to access and
copy the records as needed.
8. Section 970.5204–3(e)—The
applicability of the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause was
modified to make it clear that the
records maintained by the contractor,
whether they be Government-owned or
contractor-owned, include all records in
the possession of the contractor
regardless of the date of origin and
include those records acquired from a
predecessor contractor. Therefore, this
paragraph has been updated to not
specify just particular paragraphs but
the entire clause.
9. Section 970.5204–3(f)—The title of
this paragraph has been modified to
read ‘‘Records maintenance and
retention’’ and expanded to more specify
the contractors records management
responsibilities for the creation,
maintenance, and disposition of records
in accordance with applicable federal
laws, regulations and DOE Directives.
The proposed revision provides clear
direction to the contractor and
subcontractor on their records
management responsibilities, in
particular maintenance, disposition and
ownership of records. The language was
also revised to clearly link retention of
records to the DOE Records Disposition
Schedules and DOE removed language
that singles out individual radiation
exposure records as such records will be
operated and maintained by the
contractor as Government-owned DOE
Privacy Act Systems of Records.
10. Section 970.5204–3(g)—This
paragraph is revised to eliminate the $2
Million threshold for flow down of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:33 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Access to and Ownership of Records
clause as its applicability is more
appropriately determined by the nature
of the work not the cost of the contract
(i.e., subcontracts in which contract
performance exposes personnel to
hazardous material, radiation, or longterm health issues). Therefore, this
paragraph has been modified and
expanded to require inclusion in
subcontracts that contain the Integration
of Environment, Safety and Health into
work Planning and Execution clause at
952.223–71 or the Radiation Protection
and Nuclear Criticality clause at
952.223–72, consistent with the
prescription for prime contracts in
DEAR 970.0407–1–3, and the contractor
records retention applicability in DEAR
904.702. This paragraph has also been
modified to include flow down of the
Privacy Act clause into subcontracts.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993.
Accordingly, this rule is not subject to
review under the Executive Order by the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of
Management and Budget.
B. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, Section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on executive agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. With regard to
the review required by Section 3(a),
Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that executive
agencies make every reasonable effort to
ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly
specifies the preemptive effect, if any;
(2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines
issued by the Attorney General. Section
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or that
it is unreasonable to meet one or more
of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to
the extent permitted by law, these
proposed regulations meet the relevant
standards of Executive Order 12988.
C. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., which requires
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for any rule that
must be proposed for public comment
and is likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on small entities
because it imposes no significant
burdens.
Accordingly, DOE certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
and, therefore, no regulatory flexibility
analysis has been prepared.
D. Review Under Paperwork Reduction
Act
This rulemaking contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements. Existing information
collections imposed by the Department
of Energy Acquisition Regulation are
covered by OMB Control Number 1910–
4100.
E. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
DOE has concluded that promulgation
of this proposed rule falls into a class of
actions which would not individually or
cumulatively have significant impact on
the human environment, as determined
by DOE’s regulations (10 CFR part 1021,
subpart D) implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Specifically, this proposed rule is
categorically excluded from NEPA
review because the amendments to the
DEAR would be strictly procedural
(categorical exclusion A6). Therefore,
this proposed rule does not require an
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment pursuant to
NEPA.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 4, 1999) imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
28775
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
and implementing policies or
regulations that preempt state law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the states
and carefully assess the necessity for
such actions. DOE has examined today’s
proposed rule and has determined that
it does not preempt state law and does
not have a substantial direct effect on
the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) requires a
federal agency to perform a detailed
assessment of costs and benefits of any
rule imposing a federal mandate with
costs to state, local or tribal
governments, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any single year.
This rulemaking does not impose a
federal mandate on state, local or tribal
governments or on the private sector.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277), requires
federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
or policy that may affect family wellbeing. This rule will have no impact on
family well being.
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), requires federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the OIRA, OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any
significant energy action. A ‘‘significant
energy action’’ is defined as any action
by an agency that promulgates or is
expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, or any successor order; and (2)
is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any significant energy
action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:33 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
J. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001,
44 U.S.C. 3516, note, provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
implementing guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s notice under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
K. Approval by the Office of the
Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary of Energy
has approved issuance of this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 904,
952 and 970
Government procurement.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 18,
2010.
Patrick M. Ferraro,
Acting Director, Office of Procurement and
Assistance Management, Office of
Management, Department of Energy.
Joseph F. Waddell,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and
Supply Management, National Nuclear
Security Administration.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, DOE proposes to amend
chapter 9 of Title 48 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 904—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
1. The authority citations for parts 904
and 952 continue to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101, et seq. and 50
U.S.C. 2401, et seq.
2. Revise section 904.702, to read as
follows:
904.702
Applicability.
(b) Contracts containing the
Integration of Environment, Safety and
Health into Work Planning and
Execution clause at 952.223–71, or the
Radiation Protection and Nuclear
Criticality clause at 952.223–72 must
also include the Preservation of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Individual Occupational Radiation
Exposure Records clause at 952.223–75,
and the Access to and Ownership of
Records clause at 970.5204–3, which
will necessitate retention of records in
accordance with DOE Records
Disposition Schedules contained in
applicable DOE Directives, rather than
those found at FAR Subpart 4.7.
PART 952—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. In section 952.223–75, the clause
paragraph is revised to read as follows:
952.223–75 Preservation of individual
occupational radiation exposure records.
*
*
*
*
*
Individual occupational radiation exposure
records generated in the performance of work
under this contract shall be maintained by
the contractor and related contractor record
systems shall be operated as DOE Privacy Act
Systems of Records, in accordance with the
NARA-approved DOE Records Disposition
Schedules contained in applicable DOE
Directives.
PART 970—DOE MANAGEMENT AND
OPERATING CONTRACTS
4. The authority citation for part 970
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 2282a; 2282b;
2282c; 42 U.S.C. 7101, et seq.; 50 U.S.C.
2401, et seq.
5. Revise section 970.0407–1–3 to
read as follows:
970.0407–1–3
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clauses at 48 CFR 970.5204–3, Access to
and Ownership of Records and 48 CFR
52.224–2, Privacy Act, including the
listing of pertinent Privacy Act Systems
of Records, in management and
operating contracts and all contracts
that contain the Integration of
Environment, Safety, and Health into
Work Planning and Execution clause at
48 CFR 952.223–71 or the Radiation
Protection and Nuclear Criticality clause
at 48 CFR 952.223–72.
6. Amend 970.5204–3 by:
a. Revising the clause date;
b. Revising paragraph (a);
c. Adding in paragraph (b)(1), the
words ‘‘non contract related’’ before the
words ‘‘medical/health-related records)’’
and removing the words ‘‘described by
the contract as being maintained in’’ and
adding in its place, the words ‘‘operated
and maintained by the contractor in a
DOE’’ in the last sentence;
d. Adding in paragraph (b)(2) the
words ‘‘internal corporate governance
records,’’ after the word ‘‘information’’ in
the first sentence;
e. Revising paragraphs (c), (e), (f) and
(g).
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
28776
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
The revisions read as follows:
970.5204–3
records.
*
*
Access to and ownership of
*
*
*
Access to and Ownership of Records (XXX
20XX)
(a) Government-owned records. Except as
provided in paragraph (b) of this clause, all
records acquired or generated by the
contractor in its performance of this contract,
shall be the property of the Government. The
contractor, where applicable, shall maintain
DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records in
accordance with requirements of FAR
52.224–2 ‘‘Privacy Act.’’
The contractor shall operate and maintain
the following DOE Privacy Act Systems of
Records: [The Contracting Officer shall insert
the list of Government-owned records to be
operated and maintained by the contractor as
a DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records using
DOE’s most recent compilation of its Privacy
Act Systems of Records.]
*
*
*
*
*
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
(c) Contract completion or termination.
Upon contract completion or termination, the
contractor shall ensure final disposition of all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:33 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Government-owned records to a Federal
Record Center, the National Archives and
Records Administration, to a successor
contractor, its designee, or other destinations,
as directed by the Contracting Officer. Upon
the request of the Government, the contractor
shall provide either the original contractorowned records or copies of the records
identified in paragraph (b) of this clause, to
DOE or its designees, including successor
contractors. Upon delivery, title to such
records shall vest in DOE or its designees,
and such records shall be protected in
accordance with applicable federal laws
(including the Privacy Act) as appropriate. If
the contractor chooses to provide its original
contractor-owned records to the Government
or its designee, the contractor shall retain
future access rights to copy such records.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Applicability. This clause applies to all
records maintained by the contractor without
regard to the date or origination of such
records including all records acquired from
a predecessor contractor.
(f) Records maintenance and retention.
Contractor shall create, maintain, safeguard,
and disposition records in accordance with
36 CFR, Chapter 12, Subchapter B and the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA)-approved records
disposition schedules (DOE Records
Disposition Schedules), contained in
applicable DOE Directives. Records retention
standards are applicable for all classes of
records described therein, whether or not the
records are owned by the Government or the
contractor. The Government may waive
application of these records disposition
schedules, if, upon termination or
completion of the contract, the Government
exercises its right under paragraph (c) of this
clause to obtain copies and delivery of
records described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this clause.
(g) Subcontracts. The contractor shall
include the requirements of this clause and
the Privacy Act clause of FAR 52.224–2
(pursuant to FAR 24.104) in all subcontracts
that contain the Integration of Environment,
Safety and Health into Work Planning and
Execution clause at 952.223–71 or, the
Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality
clause at 952.223–72.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 2010–12404 Filed 5–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28772-28776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12404]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
48 CFR Parts 904, 952 and 970
RIN 1991-AB85
Acquisition Regulation: Access to and Ownership of Records
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to amend the
Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) to revise the
applicability and the policies and procedures involving the access to
and ownership of records. Much work at DOE facilities is performed by
contractor and subcontractor personnel and involves hazardous materials
or the possibility of exposure to radioactive materials. It is
necessary for the contractors and subcontractors to maintain extensive
records for the Government involving these workers and processes, in
particular, personnel; facility; occupational safety and health;
environment; and medical records. DOE is proposing to amend these
clauses for consistent inclusion in all applicable contracts, not just
management and operating (M&O) contracts, based on the type of work
being performed, to ensure preservation and Government ownership of
records. Additionally, the proposed revisions address
[[Page 28773]]
inconsistencies relating to DOE contractor and subcontractor efforts in
managing records in accordance with DOE retention requirements. The
proposed revisions are being made to establish consistent records
maintenance, retention, and disposal; and to ensure certain records
generated on groups of individuals in the performance of the contract
are maintained as DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed rulemaking must be received on
or before close of business June 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: This proposed rule is available and comments may be
submitted to the Federal Electronic Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments may also be submitted electronically to
Richard.Langston@hq.doe.gov Comments may be mailed to: Richard
Langston, Procurement Policy Analyst; MA-61; U. S. Department of
Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Langston at 202-287-1339 or
Richard.Langston@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under Executive Order 12988
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
E. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
I. Background
The Access to and Ownership of Records clause, at 48 CFR 970.5204-
3, raises a number of concerns, including the lack of inclusion of the
clause in non-M&O contracts; records systems identified as contractor-
owned may not be operated and records may not be maintained
appropriately as Privacy Act Systems of Records and for the required
retention period; and the need for the Government to maintain
personnel; facility; occupational safety and health; environment; and
medical records on contractors and subcontractors long-term based on
NARA-approved DOE Records Disposition Schedules and to support the
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act
(EEOICPA), the DOE Former Worker Medical Screening Program (FWP) and
other records requests.
In light of the fact that most of the DOE sites have been in
existence for as many as 60 years, there are inherent variations in
quality, complexity, and completeness of recordkeeping practices. While
DOE cannot recreate records that no longer exist, it is vital that DOE
preserve ownership of, and access to, records in accordance with laws
and regulations. In particular preservation of records that are vital
to the safety, health and well being of past, present and future
workers and the surrounding communities.
The proposed revisions address inclusion of the clause in all
applicable contracts, not just M&O contracts, based on the type of work
being performed, provides clarity to the DOE contractor and
subcontractor on their records management responsibilities, in
particular the maintenance, retention, disposition, and Government
ownership of records [see 44 U.S.C. chapters 21, 29, 31, 33, and 35,
and 36 CFR chapter 12, subchapter B], including operating and
maintaining records as DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records [FAR 52-224-
2]; ensures preservation and ownership of personnel, facility;
occupational safety and health, environment, medical records [see 10
CFR part 850, 10 CFR part 851, 29 CFR part 1904, and 29 CFR part 1910]
and facility records required for decision-making and in support of the
administration of the EEOICPA allows for DOE to identify and contact
individuals in the future for participation in the FWP; and to meet
other future records requests.
These revisions will also serve to stress the importance of
complete and accurate documentation and proper recordkeeping to
adequately document Government funded activities, preserve
institutional memory, protect the legal and financial rights of the
Government, and preserve worker and facility records to ensure records
are available to the Government when needed.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
The Department proposes to amend the DEAR as follows.
1. Subpart 904.7--The clause applicability specification for
Contractor Records Retention at 904.702 has been revised to update the
name of the Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work
Planning and Execution clause, delete the reference to the obsolete
Nuclear Safety clause, add a requirement to include the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause, and specifically reference the ``DOE
Records Disposition Schedules'' in applicable DOE Directives. These
changes are being made to ensure that all contracts that generate
records include the requirements of the Access to and Ownership of
Records clause to ensure Government ownership and access to these
records and to establish consistent records management practices in the
retention of records.
2. Section 952.223-75--DOE added language to the preservation of
individual occupational radiation exposure records that requires such
records be operated and maintained by contractors as a DOE Privacy Act
Systems of Records (i.e., as DOE-35 Personnel Radiation Exposure
Records) and emphasizes the requirement to maintain these records in
accordance with the NARA-approved DOE Records Disposition Schedules.
3. Section 970.0407-1-3--The prescription of the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause has been expanded to require inclusion in
more than just M&O contracts, but must also be included in contracts
that contain the Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health into
Work Planning and Execution clause at 48 CFR 952.223-71, and the
Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality clause at 48 CFR 952.223-
72. This change is made to ensure that the Access to and Ownership of
Records clause is included consistently in all applicable contracts
based on the type of work being performed (e.g., work that exposes
personnel to hazardous material, radiation or long-term health issues),
not just M&O contracts. In addition, the FAR Privacy Act clause at 48
CFR 52.224-2 must also be included in all contracts that include the
Access to and Ownership of Records clause as records systems are to be
operated, and records generated on groups of individuals in the
performance of the contract are to be maintained by the contractor as a
DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records.
4. Section 970.5204-3(a)--Language was added to require contractors
to operate and maintain certain records classified as Government-owned
records as DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records as determined by the
Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer will tailor the list of
Government-owned records to be operated and maintained by the
contractor as Privacy Act Systems of Records using DOE's most recent
compilation of the Privacy Act Systems of Records (see 74 FR 994,
January 9, 2009).
[[Page 28774]]
5. Section 970.5204-3(b)(1)--The words ``non-contract related''
were added before the words ``medical/health-related records'' to make
it clear that those personnel medical records that are not collected by
the contractor in the direct performance of its contract (i.e.,
corporate wellness programs) could be considered separate and distinct
from contract-related personnel medical records.
6. Section 970.5204-3(b)(2)--The words ``internal corporate
governance records'' was added to the list of confidential contractor
financial information to make it clear that these types of records
should be considered to be confidential contractor records.
7. Section 970.5204-3(c)--Language was added to clarify the
disposition of both Government-owned and contractor-owned records at
contract completion or termination. An option was added to allow
contractors to deliver ``original'' records to the Government in lieu
of copying these records with assurance that the contractor will have
rights to access and copy the records as needed.
8. Section 970.5204-3(e)--The applicability of the Access to and
Ownership of Records clause was modified to make it clear that the
records maintained by the contractor, whether they be Government-owned
or contractor-owned, include all records in the possession of the
contractor regardless of the date of origin and include those records
acquired from a predecessor contractor. Therefore, this paragraph has
been updated to not specify just particular paragraphs but the entire
clause.
9. Section 970.5204-3(f)--The title of this paragraph has been
modified to read ``Records maintenance and retention'' and expanded to
more specify the contractors records management responsibilities for
the creation, maintenance, and disposition of records in accordance
with applicable federal laws, regulations and DOE Directives. The
proposed revision provides clear direction to the contractor and
subcontractor on their records management responsibilities, in
particular maintenance, disposition and ownership of records. The
language was also revised to clearly link retention of records to the
DOE Records Disposition Schedules and DOE removed language that singles
out individual radiation exposure records as such records will be
operated and maintained by the contractor as Government-owned DOE
Privacy Act Systems of Records.
10. Section 970.5204-3(g)--This paragraph is revised to eliminate
the $2 Million threshold for flow down of the Access to and Ownership
of Records clause as its applicability is more appropriately determined
by the nature of the work not the cost of the contract (i.e.,
subcontracts in which contract performance exposes personnel to
hazardous material, radiation, or long-term health issues). Therefore,
this paragraph has been modified and expanded to require inclusion in
subcontracts that contain the Integration of Environment, Safety and
Health into work Planning and Execution clause at 952.223-71 or the
Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality clause at 952.223-72,
consistent with the prescription for prime contracts in DEAR 970.0407-
1-3, and the contractor records retention applicability in DEAR
904.702. This paragraph has also been modified to include flow down of
the Privacy Act clause into subcontracts.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993. Accordingly, this rule is not
subject to review under the Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of
Management and Budget.
B. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. With regard to the review required
by Section 3(a), Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure
that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if
any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General.
Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable standards in section 3(a) and
section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or that it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
these proposed regulations meet the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., which requires preparation of an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule that must be
proposed for public comment and is likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on small entities
because it imposes no significant burdens.
Accordingly, DOE certifies that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
and, therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared.
D. Review Under Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements. Existing information collections imposed by
the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation are covered by OMB
Control Number 1910-4100.
E. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has concluded that promulgation of this proposed rule falls
into a class of actions which would not individually or cumulatively
have significant impact on the human environment, as determined by
DOE's regulations (10 CFR part 1021, subpart D) implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.). Specifically, this proposed rule is categorically excluded from
NEPA review because the amendments to the DEAR would be strictly
procedural (categorical exclusion A6). Therefore, this proposed rule
does not require an environmental impact statement or environmental
assessment pursuant to NEPA.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999) imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
[[Page 28775]]
and implementing policies or regulations that preempt state law or that
have federalism implications. Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the states and carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. DOE has examined today's proposed rule
and has determined that it does not preempt state law and does not have
a substantial direct effect on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires a
federal agency to perform a detailed assessment of costs and benefits
of any rule imposing a federal mandate with costs to state, local or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more
in any single year. This rulemaking does not impose a federal mandate
on state, local or tribal governments or on the private sector.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277), requires federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for any rule or policy that may affect
family well-being. This rule will have no impact on family well being.
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001), requires federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
OIRA, OMB, a Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgates or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any significant energy action, the
agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy
supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This proposed rule is not a significant energy action. Accordingly,
DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001, 44
U.S.C. 3516, note, provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under implementing guidelines established
by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today's notice under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary of Energy has approved issuance of this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 904, 952 and 970
Government procurement.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 18, 2010.
Patrick M. Ferraro,
Acting Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management,
Office of Management, Department of Energy.
Joseph F. Waddell,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, National
Nuclear Security Administration.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, DOE proposes to amend
chapter 9 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth
below:
PART 904--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
1. The authority citations for parts 904 and 952 continue to read
as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101, et seq. and 50 U.S.C. 2401, et seq.
2. Revise section 904.702, to read as follows:
904.702 Applicability.
(b) Contracts containing the Integration of Environment, Safety and
Health into Work Planning and Execution clause at 952.223-71, or the
Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality clause at 952.223-72 must
also include the Preservation of Individual Occupational Radiation
Exposure Records clause at 952.223-75, and the Access to and Ownership
of Records clause at 970.5204-3, which will necessitate retention of
records in accordance with DOE Records Disposition Schedules contained
in applicable DOE Directives, rather than those found at FAR Subpart
4.7.
PART 952--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. In section 952.223-75, the clause paragraph is revised to read
as follows:
952.223-75 Preservation of individual occupational radiation exposure
records.
* * * * *
Individual occupational radiation exposure records generated in
the performance of work under this contract shall be maintained by
the contractor and related contractor record systems shall be
operated as DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records, in accordance with
the NARA-approved DOE Records Disposition Schedules contained in
applicable DOE Directives.
PART 970--DOE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS
4. The authority citation for part 970 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 2282a; 2282b; 2282c; 42 U.S.C. 7101,
et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401, et seq.
5. Revise section 970.0407-1-3 to read as follows:
970.0407-1-3 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clauses at 48 CFR
970.5204-3, Access to and Ownership of Records and 48 CFR 52.224-2,
Privacy Act, including the listing of pertinent Privacy Act Systems of
Records, in management and operating contracts and all contracts that
contain the Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health into Work
Planning and Execution clause at 48 CFR 952.223-71 or the Radiation
Protection and Nuclear Criticality clause at 48 CFR 952.223-72.
6. Amend 970.5204-3 by:
a. Revising the clause date;
b. Revising paragraph (a);
c. Adding in paragraph (b)(1), the words ``non contract related''
before the words ``medical/health-related records)'' and removing the
words ``described by the contract as being maintained in'' and adding
in its place, the words ``operated and maintained by the contractor in
a DOE'' in the last sentence;
d. Adding in paragraph (b)(2) the words ``internal corporate
governance records,'' after the word ``information'' in the first
sentence;
e. Revising paragraphs (c), (e), (f) and (g).
[[Page 28776]]
The revisions read as follows:
970.5204-3 Access to and ownership of records.
* * * * *
Access to and Ownership of Records (XXX 20XX)
(a) Government-owned records. Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this clause, all records acquired or generated by the
contractor in its performance of this contract, shall be the
property of the Government. The contractor, where applicable, shall
maintain DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records in accordance with
requirements of FAR 52.224-2 ``Privacy Act.''
The contractor shall operate and maintain the following DOE
Privacy Act Systems of Records: [The Contracting Officer shall
insert the list of Government-owned records to be operated and
maintained by the contractor as a DOE Privacy Act Systems of Records
using DOE's most recent compilation of its Privacy Act Systems of
Records.]
* * * * *
(c) Contract completion or termination. Upon contract completion
or termination, the contractor shall ensure final disposition of all
Government-owned records to a Federal Record Center, the National
Archives and Records Administration, to a successor contractor, its
designee, or other destinations, as directed by the Contracting
Officer. Upon the request of the Government, the contractor shall
provide either the original contractor-owned records or copies of
the records identified in paragraph (b) of this clause, to DOE or
its designees, including successor contractors. Upon delivery, title
to such records shall vest in DOE or its designees, and such records
shall be protected in accordance with applicable federal laws
(including the Privacy Act) as appropriate. If the contractor
chooses to provide its original contractor-owned records to the
Government or its designee, the contractor shall retain future
access rights to copy such records.
* * * * *
(e) Applicability. This clause applies to all records maintained
by the contractor without regard to the date or origination of such
records including all records acquired from a predecessor
contractor.
(f) Records maintenance and retention. Contractor shall create,
maintain, safeguard, and disposition records in accordance with 36
CFR, Chapter 12, Subchapter B and the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA)-approved records disposition schedules (DOE
Records Disposition Schedules), contained in applicable DOE
Directives. Records retention standards are applicable for all
classes of records described therein, whether or not the records are
owned by the Government or the contractor. The Government may waive
application of these records disposition schedules, if, upon
termination or completion of the contract, the Government exercises
its right under paragraph (c) of this clause to obtain copies and
delivery of records described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
clause.
(g) Subcontracts. The contractor shall include the requirements
of this clause and the Privacy Act clause of FAR 52.224-2 (pursuant
to FAR 24.104) in all subcontracts that contain the Integration of
Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution
clause at 952.223-71 or, the Radiation Protection and Nuclear
Criticality clause at 952.223-72.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 2010-12404 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P