Airworthiness Directives; Dowty Propellers R175/4-30-4/13; R175/4-30-4/13e; R184/4-30-4/50; R193/4-30-4/50; R193/4-30-4/61; R193/4-30-4/64; R193/4-30-4/65; R193/4-30-4/66; R.209/4-40-4.5/2; R212/4-30-4/22; R.245/4-40-4.5/13; R257/4-30-4/60; and R.259/4-40-4.5/17 Model Propellers, 28483-28485 [2010-11764]
Download as PDF
28483
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2009–0171, dated August 5, 2009;
and the service bulletins identified in Table
2 of this AD; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information
contained in Table 3 of this AD to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS–EAW
(Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
TABLE 3—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Revision
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–29–0124, including Appendices 1, 2, and 3 .....................................
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–29–6060, including Appendices 1, 2, and 3 .....................................
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310–29–2097, including Appendices 1, 2, and 3 .....................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 11,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–11757 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0750; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–21–AD; Amendment 39–
16302; AD 2010–10–23]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dowty
Propellers R175/4–30–4/13; R175/4–30–
4/13e; R184/4–30–4/50; R193/4–30–
4/50; R193/4–30–4/61; R193/4–30–4/64;
R193/4–30–4/65; R193/4–30–4/66;
R.209/4–40–4.5/2; R212/4–30–4/22;
R.245/4–40–4.5/13; R257/4–30–4/60;
and R.259/4–40–4.5/17 Model
Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the Dowty Propellers, propeller models
listed above. That AD currently
requires, for all Dowty Rotol propellers,
visual inspections for seizure and for
cadmium plating of the blade pitch
change operating links and eyebolt fork
assemblies. That AD also requires
replacement or heat-treatment of the
blade pitch change operating links and
eyebolt fork assemblies, if necessary.
This AD requires the same actions, but
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:54 May 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
only for certain propeller models. This
AD results from the FAA determining
that AD 70–16–02 does not apply to all
propellers, since current Dowty
propellers are differently designed. We
are issuing this AD supersedure to
specify the affected propeller models,
and to prevent seizure or embrittlement
and cracking of the blade pitch change
operating links and eyebolt fork
assemblies, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
25, 2010. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in the regulations as of June 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You can get the service
information identified in this AD from
Dowty Propellers, Anson Business Park,
Cheltenham Road East, Gloucester GL2
9QN, UK; Telephone 44 (0) 1452
716000; fax 44 (0) 1452 716001.
The Docket Operations office is
located at Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terry.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238–
7155; fax (781) 238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
superseding AD 70–16–02, Amendment
39–1503 (37 FR 16535, August 16,
1972), with a proposed AD. The
proposed AD applies to certain Dowty
Propellers, propeller models. We
published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on August 29, 2008 (74
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Date
02
01
01
March 10, 2009.
March 10, 2009.
March 19, 2009.
FR 50892). That action proposed to
require visual inspections before further
flight of the blade pitch change
operating links and eyebolt fork
assemblies and replacement or heattreatment of them, if necessary, for
certain Dowty Propellers, propeller
models.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comment received.
Request To Revise the Proposed
Applicability
One commenter, a private citizen,
states that there were no Dowty Rotol
propellers installed on Convair 240,
340, and 440 airplanes. However, the
commenter also states that Convair 240,
340, and 440 airplanes modified by
supplemental type certificates (STC)
SA1054WE and SA1096SW, do have
Dowty Rotol propellers installed. The
propeller R.245/4–40–4.5 is used on a
Convair model 240, redesignated as
Convair model 600 on supplemental
type certificate (STC) SA1054WE, and
the propellers R.245/4–40–4.5 and
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
28484
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
R.259/4–40–4.5 are used on Convair
models 340 and 440, redesignated
Convair model 640 on STC SA1096SW.
We partially agree. We reviewed these
STCs, and the aircraft type certificate
data sheets A–793 and 6A6, and
determined there are no official Convair
model designations of 600 or 640 for
these airplanes. We agree that Convair
airplanes models 240, 340, and 440 if
modified by these STCs have Dowty
propellers installed and are affected by
this proposed AD. We changed the AD
applicability to call out the STCs, to
remove the reference to Convair 600,
and to list the complete part numbers of
the affected propellers, instead of the
basic part numbers. We also deleted
propeller part number R251/4–30–4
from the applicability, as it was
inadvertently listed.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comment
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described
previously.
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Costs of Compliance
We anticipate that this AD will affect
no propellers installed on airplanes of
U.S. registry, as the affected propellers
should already be in compliance with
AD 70–16–02 since it became effective,
on August 21, 1972. Based on this
information, we estimate the total cost
of the AD to U.S. operators to be $0.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:54 May 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–1503 (37 FR
16535, August 16, 1972), and by adding
a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39–16302, to read as
follows:
■
2010–10–23 Dowty Propellers (Formerly
Dowty Aerospace; Dowty Rotol Limited;
and Dowty Rotol): Amendment 39–
16302. Docket No. FAA–2008–0750;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NE–21–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective June 25, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 70–16–02,
Amendment 39–1503.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dowty Propellers
R175/4–30–4/13; R175/4–30–4/13e; R184/4–
30–4/50; R193/4–30–4/50; R193/4–30–4/61;
R193/4–30–4/64; R193/4–30–4/65; R193/4–
30–4/66; R.209/4–40–4.5/2; R212/4–30–4/22;
R.245/4–40–4.5/13; R257/4–30–4/60; and
R.259/4–40–4.5/17 model propellers. These
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
propellers are installed on, but not limited to,
Fairchild F–27, Fairchild-Hiller FH–227,
Grumman G–159, Nihon YS–11, and BAe HS
748 Series 2 airplanes, Convair 240 airplanes
modified per supplemental type certificate
(STC) SA1054WE, and Convair 340 and 440
airplanes modified per STC SA1096SW.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from the FAA
determining that AD 70–16–02 does not
apply to all propellers, since current Dowty
Rotol propellers are differently designed. We
are issuing this AD supersedure to specify
the affected propeller models, and to prevent
seizure or embrittlement and cracking of the
blade pitch change operating links and
eyebolt fork assemblies, which could result
in reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed before
further flight after the effective date of this
AD, unless the actions have already been
done.
(f) Inspect the blade pitch change operating
link and eyebolt fork assembly for:
(1) Seizure (the link and eyebolt are seized
if the torque required to move the link is 300
inch pounds or more); and
(2) Cadmium plating on the mating
surfaces between the operating link and
eyebolt fork and the holes through the
eyebolt fork and the operating link.
(g) If the link and eyebolt fork are not
seized and have not been cadmium plated,
they may remain in service.
(h) If the link and eyebolt fork are not
seized but cadmium plating is found in the
prohibited areas, remove the plating by
means of wet or dry silicon carbide paper,
fine or medium grade, and conduct a
magnetic crack test. If no cracks are found,
the assembly may remain in service until the
next propeller overhaul for air carrier
airplanes and airplanes under a continuous
maintenance program or for 3,300 hours
time-in-service after the effective date of this
AD for all other airplanes. At the next
propeller overhaul for air carrier airplanes
and airplanes under a continuous
maintenance program, or within 3,300 hours
time-in-service after the effective date of this
AD for all other airplanes, heat treat the links
and eyebolt forks found to have been
cadmium plated, to remove embrittlement.
Use Dowty Rotol Service Bulletin No. 61–
754, dated June 12, 1970 to perform the heat
treatment.
(i) If the link and eyebolt fork are seized,
remove the link and eyebolt fork from service
and replace them with an assembly having a
part number approved for that model
propeller that has not been cadmium plated
in the prohibited areas.
(j) If the link or eyebolt fork are found to
be cracked during the inspection in
paragraph (h) of this AD, remove the cracked
part from service and replace it with a part
having a part number approved for that
model propeller that has not been cadmium
plated.
(k) The inspection required by paragraph
(f) of this AD need not be performed and the
propeller may remain in service if:
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(1) The operator can show that no
cadmium plating exists in the prohibited
areas of that propeller; or
(2) It is a new propeller that has never been
overhauled.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(l) The Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for this AD if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(m) Contact Terry Fahr, Aerospace
Engineer, Boston Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA 01803; e-mail: terry.fahr@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7155; fax (781) 238–
7170, for more information about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Dowty Rotol Service
Bulletin No. 61–754, dated June 12, 1970 to
perform the heat treatment required by this
AD. The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service bulletin in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact
Dowty Propellers, Anson Business Park,
Cheltenham Road East, Gloucester GL2 9QN,
UK; Telephone 44 (0) 1452 716000; fax 44 (0)
1452 716001 for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
FAA, New England Region, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on
May 5, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–11764 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0034; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–120–AD; Amendment
39–16307; AD 2010–11–02]
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Israel Aircraft
Industries, Ltd.) Model Gulfstream 100
Airplanes, and Model Astra SPX and
1125 Westwind Astra Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
12:54 May 20, 2010
Incomplete closure of the MED [main entry
door] may be followed by in-flight opening
of the door. As a result, the MED and the
adjacent fuselage structure may be damaged
during opening and landing impact. Damage
to the left engine by flying debris and objects
may also occur.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
25, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of June 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2677; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VerDate Mar<15>2010
SUMMARY: We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the products listed above. This AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 220001
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on February 8, 2010 (75 FR
6157), and proposed to supersede AD
2007–03–05, Amendment 39–14916 (72
FR 4414, January 31, 2007). That NPRM
proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
To increase pilots’ awareness to the
possibility of incomplete closure of the Main
Entry Door (MED) by the following means:
1. Splitting the common caution light
CABIN DOOR signaling both MED Improper
Closure and MED Inflatable Seal Failure into
two separate lights: CABIN DOOR and
CABIN DOOR SEAL.
2. Converting the separated CABIN DOOR
Caution light into a Warning light by
changing its color to red.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28485
Note: Aircraft Flight Manuals (AFM’S)
refer to these changes as MOD G1–20052.
Incomplete closure of the MED may be
followed by in-flight opening of the door. As
a result, the MED and the adjacent fuselage
structure may be damaged during opening
and landing impact. Damage to the left
engine by flying debris and objects may also
occur.
Required actions include modifying the
warning and caution lights panel
(WACLP), changing the WACLP and
MED wiring, changing the wiring
harness connecting the MED to the
WACLP, and ensuring the Log of
Modification of the AFM includes
reference to MOD G1–20052. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Explanation of Change to Applicability
We have revised the applicability of
the existing AD to identify model
designations as published in the most
recent type certificate data sheet for the
affected models.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of
Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have
increased the labor rate used in the
Costs of Compliance from $80 per workhour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of
Compliance information, below, reflects
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28483-28485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0750; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-21-AD;
Amendment 39-16302; AD 2010-10-23]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dowty Propellers R175/4-30-4/13; R175/
4-30-4/13e; R184/4-30-4/50; R193/4-30- 4/50; R193/4-30-4/61; R193/4-30-
4/64; R193/4-30-4/65; R193/4-30-4/66; R.209/4-40-4.5/2; R212/4-30-4/22;
R.245/4-40-4.5/13; R257/4-30-4/60; and R.259/4-40-4.5/17 Model
Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for the Dowty Propellers, propeller models listed above. That AD
currently requires, for all Dowty Rotol propellers, visual inspections
for seizure and for cadmium plating of the blade pitch change operating
links and eyebolt fork assemblies. That AD also requires replacement or
heat-treatment of the blade pitch change operating links and eyebolt
fork assemblies, if necessary. This AD requires the same actions, but
only for certain propeller models. This AD results from the FAA
determining that AD 70-16-02 does not apply to all propellers, since
current Dowty propellers are differently designed. We are issuing this
AD supersedure to specify the affected propeller models, and to prevent
seizure or embrittlement and cracking of the blade pitch change
operating links and eyebolt fork assemblies, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June 25, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations as of June 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You can get the service information identified in this AD
from Dowty Propellers, Anson Business Park, Cheltenham Road East,
Gloucester GL2 9QN, UK; Telephone 44 (0) 1452 716000; fax 44 (0) 1452
716001.
The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terry.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7155; fax (781) 238-7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
superseding AD 70-16-02, Amendment 39-1503 (37 FR 16535, August 16,
1972), with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to certain Dowty
Propellers, propeller models. We published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on August 29, 2008 (74 FR 50892). That action proposed
to require visual inspections before further flight of the blade pitch
change operating links and eyebolt fork assemblies and replacement or
heat-treatment of them, if necessary, for certain Dowty Propellers,
propeller models.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comment received.
Request To Revise the Proposed Applicability
One commenter, a private citizen, states that there were no Dowty
Rotol propellers installed on Convair 240, 340, and 440 airplanes.
However, the commenter also states that Convair 240, 340, and 440
airplanes modified by supplemental type certificates (STC) SA1054WE and
SA1096SW, do have Dowty Rotol propellers installed. The propeller
R.245/4-40-4.5 is used on a Convair model 240, redesignated as Convair
model 600 on supplemental type certificate (STC) SA1054WE, and the
propellers R.245/4-40-4.5 and
[[Page 28484]]
R.259/4-40-4.5 are used on Convair models 340 and 440, redesignated
Convair model 640 on STC SA1096SW.
We partially agree. We reviewed these STCs, and the aircraft type
certificate data sheets A-793 and 6A6, and determined there are no
official Convair model designations of 600 or 640 for these airplanes.
We agree that Convair airplanes models 240, 340, and 440 if modified by
these STCs have Dowty propellers installed and are affected by this
proposed AD. We changed the AD applicability to call out the STCs, to
remove the reference to Convair 600, and to list the complete part
numbers of the affected propellers, instead of the basic part numbers.
We also deleted propeller part number R251/4-30-4 from the
applicability, as it was inadvertently listed.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comment received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We anticipate that this AD will affect no propellers installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry, as the affected propellers should already
be in compliance with AD 70-16-02 since it became effective, on August
21, 1972. Based on this information, we estimate the total cost of the
AD to U.S. operators to be $0.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-1503 (37 FR
16535, August 16, 1972), and by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-16302, to read as follows:
2010-10-23 Dowty Propellers (Formerly Dowty Aerospace; Dowty Rotol
Limited; and Dowty Rotol): Amendment 39-16302. Docket No. FAA-2008-
0750; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-21-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 25,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 70-16-02, Amendment 39-1503.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dowty Propellers R175/4-30-4/13; R175/4-
30-4/13e; R184/4-30-4/50; R193/4-30-4/50; R193/4-30-4/61; R193/4-30-
4/64; R193/4-30-4/65; R193/4-30-4/66; R.209/4-40-4.5/2; R212/4-30-4/
22; R.245/4-40-4.5/13; R257/4-30-4/60; and R.259/4-40-4.5/17 model
propellers. These propellers are installed on, but not limited to,
Fairchild F-27, Fairchild-Hiller FH-227, Grumman G-159, Nihon YS-11,
and BAe HS 748 Series 2 airplanes, Convair 240 airplanes modified
per supplemental type certificate (STC) SA1054WE, and Convair 340
and 440 airplanes modified per STC SA1096SW.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from the FAA determining that AD 70-16-02
does not apply to all propellers, since current Dowty Rotol
propellers are differently designed. We are issuing this AD
supersedure to specify the affected propeller models, and to prevent
seizure or embrittlement and cracking of the blade pitch change
operating links and eyebolt fork assemblies, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed before further flight after the effective date of this
AD, unless the actions have already been done.
(f) Inspect the blade pitch change operating link and eyebolt
fork assembly for:
(1) Seizure (the link and eyebolt are seized if the torque
required to move the link is 300 inch pounds or more); and
(2) Cadmium plating on the mating surfaces between the operating
link and eyebolt fork and the holes through the eyebolt fork and the
operating link.
(g) If the link and eyebolt fork are not seized and have not
been cadmium plated, they may remain in service.
(h) If the link and eyebolt fork are not seized but cadmium
plating is found in the prohibited areas, remove the plating by
means of wet or dry silicon carbide paper, fine or medium grade, and
conduct a magnetic crack test. If no cracks are found, the assembly
may remain in service until the next propeller overhaul for air
carrier airplanes and airplanes under a continuous maintenance
program or for 3,300 hours time-in-service after the effective date
of this AD for all other airplanes. At the next propeller overhaul
for air carrier airplanes and airplanes under a continuous
maintenance program, or within 3,300 hours time-in-service after the
effective date of this AD for all other airplanes, heat treat the
links and eyebolt forks found to have been cadmium plated, to remove
embrittlement. Use Dowty Rotol Service Bulletin No. 61-754, dated
June 12, 1970 to perform the heat treatment.
(i) If the link and eyebolt fork are seized, remove the link and
eyebolt fork from service and replace them with an assembly having a
part number approved for that model propeller that has not been
cadmium plated in the prohibited areas.
(j) If the link or eyebolt fork are found to be cracked during
the inspection in paragraph (h) of this AD, remove the cracked part
from service and replace it with a part having a part number
approved for that model propeller that has not been cadmium plated.
(k) The inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD need not
be performed and the propeller may remain in service if:
[[Page 28485]]
(1) The operator can show that no cadmium plating exists in the
prohibited areas of that propeller; or
(2) It is a new propeller that has never been overhauled.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(l) The Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(m) Contact Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terry.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7155; fax (781) 238-7170,
for more information about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Dowty Rotol Service Bulletin No. 61-754, dated
June 12, 1970 to perform the heat treatment required by this AD. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this service bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Dowty Propellers, Anson Business
Park, Cheltenham Road East, Gloucester GL2 9QN, UK; Telephone 44 (0)
1452 716000; fax 44 (0) 1452 716001 for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on May 5, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11764 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P