Safety Zone; Washington State Department of Transportation Ferries Division Marine Rescue Response (M2R) Full-Scale Exercise for a Mass Rescue Incident (MRI), 28200-28202 [2010-12062]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
28200
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Guard notifies the public that
enforcement of the zone in specified
sections is temporarily suspended.
Mariners need not obtain permission in
accordance with the procedure
described in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section to enter a zone section in which
enforcement is temporarily suspended.
At all other times, mariners must obtain
permission in accordance with the
procedure described in paragraph (d)(2)
before entering any of those sections.
(3) The COTP will provide notice of
suspended enforcement by means
appropriate to effect the widest
publicity, including broadcast notice to
mariners, publication in the local notice
to mariners, and posting the schedule of
restricted access periods by date,
location and duration at https://
www.scisland.org.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones
found in 33 CFR 165.23 apply to the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through any section of the zone
may request authorization to do so from
the Fleet Area Control and Surveillance
Facility (FACSFAC) San Diego by either
calling 619–545–4742 or establishing a
VHF bridge to bridge radio connection
on Channel 16. Immediately upon
completing transit, the vessel operator
must promptly notify the FACSFAC of
safe passage through the safety zone.
Failure to expeditiously notify
FACSFAC of passage through the safety
zone will result in a determination by
the Navy that the vessel is still in the
safety zone, thereby restricting the use
of the area for naval operations. If the
Navy determines that facilitating safe
transit through the zone negatively
impacts range operations, the Navy will
cease this practice and enforce the
safety zones in these two areas without
exception.
(3) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the U.S.
Navy, Coast Guard Captain of the Port
or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Navy or
U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel must
proceed as directed.
(5) The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section by the U.S.
Navy and local law enforcement
agencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: April 22, 2010.
T. H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010–12063 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0389]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Washington State
Department of Transportation Ferries
Division Marine Rescue Response
(M2R) Full-Scale Exercise for a Mass
Rescue Incident (MRI)
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Washington State
Department of Transportation Ferries
Division (WSF) is conducting a Marine
Rescue Response (M2R) full-scale
exercise in Port Madison. This training
exercise will simulate a mass rescue
incident (MRI) and will involve an
abandon ship scenario with multiple
response vessels. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
the participating ferries, rescue vessels,
and the maritime public during the
exercise by prohibiting any vessel
operators from entering or remaining
within a 500-yard radius of the
participating ferries unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound
or Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
until 11:59 p.m. on 25 May 2010, unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0389 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0389 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Ensign Rebecca E.
McCann, Sector Seattle, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
telephone 206–217–6088, e-mail
Rebecca.E.McCann@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of life and property on
navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest
because hazards associated with large
scale training exercises could lead to
severe injury, fatalities and/or
destruction of public property.
Therefore immediate action is necessary
to ensure safety of the public and of
participants in the WSF M2R exercise.
Basis and Purpose
The WSF is hosting a M2R full scale
exercise which will simulate a MRI to
provide training in specific emergency
response procedures. The exercise will
test WSF procedures, and establish
protocols with the response
organization specific to ferries in the
Puget Sound area. This temporary safety
zone will mitigate navigation and safety
concerns that may arise from the
exercise by restricting the area and
keeping any transiting vessels from
interfering.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone within Port
Madison, Washington. This safety zone
is established to prohibit any vessel
operator from entering or remaining
within 500 yards of the ferries
participating in the WSF M2R exercise,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound or Designated
Representative. The simulation involves
one large ferry dead in the water (DIW),
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
being assisted by another large ferry and
will temporarily affect vessel traffic. The
zone will be effective between 8 a.m and
11:59 p.m. on May 26, 2010.
The Captain of the Port may be
assisted in the enforcement of the zone
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this safety zone will restrict
access to the area, the effect of the rule
will not be significant because: the
safety zone will be in place for a limited
period of time and maritime traffic will
still be able to transit around the zone.
Additionally, maritime traffic may
request permission to transit through
the zone from the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or Designated
Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in Port
Madison, Washington between 8 a.m.
and 11:59 p.m. on 25 May 2010. The
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because the
safety zone is short in duration and
maritime traffic will be able to transit
around the safety zone. Maritime traffic
may also request permission to transit
through the zone from the Captain of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
28201
Port, Puget Sound or Designated
Representative.
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
28202
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165, as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Security Zone; Escorted U.S. Navy
Submarines in Sector Seattle Captain
of the Port Zone
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–144 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–144 Safety Zone; Washington
State Department of Transportation Ferries
Division Marine Rescue Response (M2R)
Full-Scale Exercise for a Mass Rescue
Incident (MRI).
(a) Location. All waters encompassed
within 500 yards of the Washington
State Ferries involved in the M2R
exercise in Port Madison, WA on 25
May 2010.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no vessel operator may
enter or remain in the safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of
the Port or Designated Representative.
The Captain of the Port may be assisted
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a moving security zone
around any U.S. Navy submarine that is
operating in the Sector Seattle Captain
of the Port Zone, which includes the
Puget Sound and coastal waters of the
State of Washington, and is being
escorted by the Coast Guard. The
security zone is necessary to help
ensure the security of the submarines,
their Coast Guard security escorts, and
the maritime public in general. The
security zone will do so by prohibiting
all persons and vessels from coming
within 1000 yards of an escorted
submarine unless authorized by the
Coast Guard patrol commander.
DATES: This rule is effective May 20,
2010.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–1057 and are
available online by going to https://
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2009–1057 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail LT Matthew N. Jones, Staff
Attorney, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District; telephone 206–220–7155,
e-mail Matthew.N.Jones@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
RIN 1625–AA87
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket No. USCG–2009–1057]
■
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–12062 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]
33 CFR Part 165
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
15:41 May 19, 2010
Dated: May 7, 2010.
S. W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
Coast Guard
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
VerDate Mar<15>2010
by other Federal, State, or local agencies
with the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated Representative by
contacting the Coast Guard Sector
Seattle Joint Harbor Operations Center
(JHOC) on VHF Ch 16 or via telephone
at (206) 217–6001. Vessel operators
granted permission to enter the zone
will be escorted by the on-scene Coast
Guard patrol craft until they are outside
of the safety zone.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is
effective from 8 a.m. until 11:59 p.m. on
25 May 2010, unless canceled sooner by
the Captain of the Port.
Sfmt 4700
On January 13, 2010, we published an
interim rule entitled ‘‘Security Zone;
Escorted U.S. Navy Submarines in
Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone’’
in the Federal Register (75 FR 1709).
We received one comment on the
proposed rule that was actually posted
to the docket of a related rule. No one
requested a public meeting and none
was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because waiting 30 days would
be contrary to the public interest since
U.S. Navy submarine operations in the
Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone
are ongoing, making the security zone
created by this rule immediately
necessary to help ensure the security of
the submarines, their Coast Guard
security escorts, and the maritime
public in general.
Background and Purpose
U.S. Navy submarines frequently
operate in the Sector Seattle Captain of
the Port Zone as defined in 33 CFR
3.65–10, which includes the Puget
Sound and coastal waters of the State of
Washington. Due to the numerous
security concerns involved with
submarine operations near shore, the
Coast Guard frequently provides
security escorts of submarines when
operating in that area. Security escorts
of this type require the Coast Guard
personnel on-scene to make quick
judgments about the intent of vessels
operating in close proximity to the
submarines and decide, occasionally
with little information about the vessels
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28200-28202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12062]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0389]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Washington State Department of Transportation
Ferries Division Marine Rescue Response (M2R) Full-Scale Exercise for a
Mass Rescue Incident (MRI)
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Washington State Department of Transportation Ferries
Division (WSF) is conducting a Marine Rescue Response (M2R) full-scale
exercise in Port Madison. This training exercise will simulate a mass
rescue incident (MRI) and will involve an abandon ship scenario with
multiple response vessels. This temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of the participating ferries, rescue vessels, and the
maritime public during the exercise by prohibiting any vessel operators
from entering or remaining within a 500-yard radius of the
participating ferries unless authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. until 11:59 p.m. on 25 May
2010, unless cancelled sooner by the Captain of the Port.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0389 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0389 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Ensign Rebecca E. McCann, Sector
Seattle, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-
6088, e-mail Rebecca.E.McCann@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of life and property on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest because hazards associated with
large scale training exercises could lead to severe injury, fatalities
and/or destruction of public property. Therefore immediate action is
necessary to ensure safety of the public and of participants in the WSF
M2R exercise.
Basis and Purpose
The WSF is hosting a M2R full scale exercise which will simulate a
MRI to provide training in specific emergency response procedures. The
exercise will test WSF procedures, and establish protocols with the
response organization specific to ferries in the Puget Sound area. This
temporary safety zone will mitigate navigation and safety concerns that
may arise from the exercise by restricting the area and keeping any
transiting vessels from interfering.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone within Port
Madison, Washington. This safety zone is established to prohibit any
vessel operator from entering or remaining within 500 yards of the
ferries participating in the WSF M2R exercise, unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated Representative. The
simulation involves one large ferry dead in the water (DIW),
[[Page 28201]]
being assisted by another large ferry and will temporarily affect
vessel traffic. The zone will be effective between 8 a.m and 11:59 p.m.
on May 26, 2010.
The Captain of the Port may be assisted in the enforcement of the
zone by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this safety zone will restrict access to the area, the
effect of the rule will not be significant because: the safety zone
will be in place for a limited period of time and maritime traffic will
still be able to transit around the zone. Additionally, maritime
traffic may request permission to transit through the zone from the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in Port Madison, Washington between 8 a.m. and 11:59 p.m. on 25
May 2010. The rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, because the safety zone is short
in duration and maritime traffic will be able to transit around the
safety zone. Maritime traffic may also request permission to transit
through the zone from the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
[[Page 28202]]
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a temporary
safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165, as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-144 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-144 Safety Zone; Washington State Department of
Transportation Ferries Division Marine Rescue Response (M2R) Full-Scale
Exercise for a Mass Rescue Incident (MRI).
(a) Location. All waters encompassed within 500 yards of the
Washington State Ferries involved in the M2R exercise in Port Madison,
WA on 25 May 2010.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no vessel operator may enter or remain in the
safety zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative by contacting the Coast Guard Sector Seattle
Joint Harbor Operations Center (JHOC) on VHF Ch 16 or via telephone at
(206) 217-6001. Vessel operators granted permission to enter the zone
will be escorted by the on-scene Coast Guard patrol craft until they
are outside of the safety zone.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 8 a.m. until
11:59 p.m. on 25 May 2010, unless canceled sooner by the Captain of the
Port.
Dated: May 7, 2010.
S. W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2010-12062 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P