Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes, 28221-28222 [2010-12023]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules
rely on a test report showing passing
test results for one or more component
parts used on the product, based on
testing by a third party conformity
assessment body. Component part test
reports must identify each component
part tested, by part number or other
specification, and the manufacturer and
the supplier of the component part (if
different).
(c) Component part certificates. As
part of its basis for certifying that a
children’s product complies with the
applicable lead content limit, a finished
product certifier may rely on a
certificate from another person
certifying that a component part
complies with the lead limit. The
component part certificate must be
based on testing by a third party
conformity assessment body of a sample
that is identical in all material respects
to the component parts used in the
finished product. The certificate
pertaining to the component part must
identify all test reports underlying the
certification consistent with section 14
of the CPSA.
(d) Certificates for the finished
product. The certificate accompanying
the children’s product must list each
component part that was tested, by part
number or other specification, and, for
each such component part, identify the
corresponding test report, paint
certificate, or component part certificate
on which a certification for the finished
children’s product is based.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
§ 1109.13 Component part testing for
phthalates in children’s toys and child care
articles.
(a) Generally. A finished product
certifier may rely on component part
testing of appropriate component parts
of a children’s toy or child care article
for phthalate content if the finished
product certifier is provided with a copy
of the original test results obtained from
the third party conformity assessment
body or a component part certificate.
(b) Component part test reports. As
part of its basis for certification of a
children’s product to the phthalate
content limit, a finished product
certifier may rely on a test report
showing passing test results for one or
more component parts used on the
product, based on testing by a third
party conformity assessment body.
Component part test reports must
identify each component part tested, by
part number or other specification, and
the component part’s supplier and, if
different, the component part’s
manufacturer.
(c) Component part certificates. As
part of its basis for certification of a
children’s product to the phthalate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
content limit, a finished product
certifier may rely on a certificate from
another person certifying that a
component part complies with the limit.
The component part certificate must be
based on testing by a third party
conformity assessment body of a sample
that is identical in all material respects
to the component part used in the
finished product. The component part
certificate must identify all test reports
underlying the certification consistent
with section 14 of the CPSA. Any
person who certifies a children’s
product as complying with the
phthalate content limits must be able to
trace each component part of the
product to the component part’s
supplier and, if different, the
component part’s manufacturer.
(d) Certificates for the finished
product. The certificate accompanying
the children’s product must list each
component part required to be tested by
part number or other specification and,
for each such part, must identify the
corresponding test report from a third
party conformity assessment body on
which the product’s certification is
based.
§ 1109.14
Composite part testing.
(a) Paint and other surface coatings.
In testing paint for compliance with
chemical content limits, testing parties
may test a combination of different
paint samples so long as they follow
procedures ensuring that no failure to
comply with the lead limits will go
undetected (see paragraph (c) of this
section). Testing and certification of
composite paints must comply with
§ 1109.11.
(b) Component parts. Third party
conformity assessment bodies may test
a combination of component parts so
long as they follow procedures ensuring
that no failure to comply with the
content limits will go undetected (see
paragraph (c) of this section). Testing
and certification of composite
component parts for lead content must
comply with § 1109.12. Testing and
certification of composite component
parts for phthalate content must comply
with § 1109.13.
(c) How to evaluate composite part
testing. When using composite part
testing, only the total amount or
percentage of the target chemical is
determined, not how much was in each
individual paint or component part.
Therefore, to determine that each paint
or component part is within the
applicable limit, the entire amount of
the target chemical in the composite is
attributed to each paint or component
part. If this method yields an amount of
the target chemical that exceeds the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28221
limit applicable to any paint or
component part in the composite
sample, additional testing would be
required to determine which of the
paints or component parts, if any, fail to
meet the applicable limit.
Dated: May 7, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–11370 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
Paroling, Recommitting, and
Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under
the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole
Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Parole Commission
proposes to amend a rule that
implements its authority under the
District of Columbia Youth
Rehabilitation Act to set aside a
conviction for a youth offender. The
proposed rule specifies the
Commission’s authority to set aside a
youth offender’s misdemeanor
conviction and describes the
information the Commission examines
in making such a determination, given
that the misdemeanant only served a jail
term for the offense without subsequent
community supervision on parole or
supervised release. In addition, the rule
clarifies the Commission’s policy for
issuing a set-aside certificate for a youth
offender who was formerly on
supervised release and who was not
reviewed for the set-aside certificate
before the offender’s sentence expired.
The proposed rule adopts the
Commission’s established criteria for
conducting set-aside reviews when a
youth offender’s parole term ends before
such a review has been held.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification
number USPC–2010–02 by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Mail: Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, 5550
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
28222
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Friendship Blvd., Chevy Chase,
Maryland 20815.
3. Fax: (301) 492–5563.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rockne Chickinell, Office of General
Counsel, U. S. Parole Commission, 5550
Friendship Blvd., Chevy Chase,
Maryland 20815, telephone (301) 492–
5959. Questions about this publication
are welcome, but inquiries concerning
individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
District of Columbia Youth
Rehabilitation Act authorizes the Parole
Commission to set aside a conviction for
a deserving youth offender who has
been committed under the Act. DC Code
24–906. The sentencing judge exercises
similar authority for a youth offender if
the judge sentenced the offender to
probation. DC Code 24–906(e).
Normally, the Commission reviews a
youth offender’s case for issuance of a
set-aside certificate after the offender
has served a period of community
supervision on parole or supervised
release following discharge from the
commitment portion of the sentence. DC
Code 24–906(a), (c), and (d) require the
issuance of a set-aside certificate if the
Commission terminates parole
supervision or supervised release before
the expiration of the committed youth
offender’s sentence. Under 24–906(b),
the Commission also has the authority
to exercise its discretion to set aside a
committed youth offender’s conviction
if the youth offender’s sentence expires
before the unconditional discharge of
the offender. This situation will
normally arise when: (1) A youth
offender’s jail term for a misdemeanor
conviction expires and the offender is
discharged from the custody of the DC
Department of Corrections without
further supervision in the community;
or (2) a youth offender is
unconditionally discharged from parole
supervision or supervised release and
the Commission somehow did not
review the case for early termination
from supervision.
The Commission’s rules presently do
not address the agency’s authority to
grant a set-aside certificate to a youth
offender who was sentenced only to a
jail term for a misdemeanor offense, or
a youth offender formerly on supervised
release who was not reviewed for early
termination from supervision before the
supervised release term expired. See 28
CFR 2.106 and 2.208. The Commission
has been carrying out its statutory
authority to consider these offenders for
set-aside certificates even in the absence
of a regulation on this function. Given
the gap in its rules on issuing set-aside
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
certificates for youth misdemeanants
who have not been on parole or
supervised release, the Commission is
proposing a revision of paragraph (a) in
28 CFR 2.208 to include a brief
statement of the Commission’s authority
to issue a set-aside certificate after the
youth offender’s sentence expires and
the information the Commission would
consider in granting or denying the setaside certificate. For former supervised
releasees, the new rule proposes a crossreference to § 2.106(f)(3), which
describes the Commission’s criteria for
issuing a set-aside certificate nunc pro
tunc for a youth offender who was on
parole supervision and who was not
reviewed for early termination from
supervision (and the possible issuance
of the set-aside certificate) before the
expiration of the sentence.
Executive Order 12866
The U.S. Parole Commission has
determined that this proposed rule does
not constitute a significant rule within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The rule will not cause State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector,
to spend $100,000,000 or more in any
one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act), now
codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rule will
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
significant adverse effects on the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies.
Moreover, this is a rule of agency
practice or procedure that does not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties, and
does not come within the meaning of
the term ‘‘rule’’ as used in Section
804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and
procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
parole.
The Proposed Rule
Accordingly, the U.S. Parole
Commission is proposing the following
amendment to 28 CFR part 2.
PART 2—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and
4204(a)(6).
2. Revise § 2.208(a)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 2.208 Termination of a term of
supervised release.
(a) * * *
(2) Upon terminating supervision of a
committed youth offender before the
sentence expires, the Commission shall
set aside the offender’s conviction and
issue a certificate setting aside the
conviction instead of a certificate of
discharge. The Commission may issue a
set-aside certificate nunc pro tunc for a
youth offender previously under
supervised release on the sentence and
who was not considered for early
termination from supervision, using the
criteria stated at § 2.106(f)(3). If the
youth offender was sentenced only to a
term of incarceration without any
supervision to follow release, the
Commission may issue a set-aside
certificate after the expiration of the
sentence. In such cases, the Commission
shall determine whether to grant the setaside certificate after considering factors
such as the offender’s crime, criminal
history, social and employment history,
record of institutional conduct, efforts at
rehabilitation, and any other relevant
and available information.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 11, 2010.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–12023 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–P
E:\FR\FM\20MYP1.SGM
20MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28221-28222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12023]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Parole Commission proposes to amend a rule that
implements its authority under the District of Columbia Youth
Rehabilitation Act to set aside a conviction for a youth offender. The
proposed rule specifies the Commission's authority to set aside a youth
offender's misdemeanor conviction and describes the information the
Commission examines in making such a determination, given that the
misdemeanant only served a jail term for the offense without subsequent
community supervision on parole or supervised release. In addition, the
rule clarifies the Commission's policy for issuing a set-aside
certificate for a youth offender who was formerly on supervised release
and who was not reviewed for the set-aside certificate before the
offender's sentence expired. The proposed rule adopts the Commission's
established criteria for conducting set-aside reviews when a youth
offender's parole term ends before such a review has been held.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
number USPC-2010-02 by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
2. Mail: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission,
5550
[[Page 28222]]
Friendship Blvd., Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.
3. Fax: (301) 492-5563.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rockne Chickinell, Office of General
Counsel, U. S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Blvd., Chevy Chase,
Maryland 20815, telephone (301) 492-5959. Questions about this
publication are welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases
cannot be answered over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The District of Columbia Youth
Rehabilitation Act authorizes the Parole Commission to set aside a
conviction for a deserving youth offender who has been committed under
the Act. DC Code 24-906. The sentencing judge exercises similar
authority for a youth offender if the judge sentenced the offender to
probation. DC Code 24-906(e). Normally, the Commission reviews a youth
offender's case for issuance of a set-aside certificate after the
offender has served a period of community supervision on parole or
supervised release following discharge from the commitment portion of
the sentence. DC Code 24-906(a), (c), and (d) require the issuance of a
set-aside certificate if the Commission terminates parole supervision
or supervised release before the expiration of the committed youth
offender's sentence. Under 24-906(b), the Commission also has the
authority to exercise its discretion to set aside a committed youth
offender's conviction if the youth offender's sentence expires before
the unconditional discharge of the offender. This situation will
normally arise when: (1) A youth offender's jail term for a misdemeanor
conviction expires and the offender is discharged from the custody of
the DC Department of Corrections without further supervision in the
community; or (2) a youth offender is unconditionally discharged from
parole supervision or supervised release and the Commission somehow did
not review the case for early termination from supervision.
The Commission's rules presently do not address the agency's
authority to grant a set-aside certificate to a youth offender who was
sentenced only to a jail term for a misdemeanor offense, or a youth
offender formerly on supervised release who was not reviewed for early
termination from supervision before the supervised release term
expired. See 28 CFR 2.106 and 2.208. The Commission has been carrying
out its statutory authority to consider these offenders for set-aside
certificates even in the absence of a regulation on this function.
Given the gap in its rules on issuing set-aside certificates for youth
misdemeanants who have not been on parole or supervised release, the
Commission is proposing a revision of paragraph (a) in 28 CFR 2.208 to
include a brief statement of the Commission's authority to issue a set-
aside certificate after the youth offender's sentence expires and the
information the Commission would consider in granting or denying the
set-aside certificate. For former supervised releasees, the new rule
proposes a cross-reference to Sec. 2.106(f)(3), which describes the
Commission's criteria for issuing a set-aside certificate nunc pro tunc
for a youth offender who was on parole supervision and who was not
reviewed for early termination from supervision (and the possible
issuance of the set-aside certificate) before the expiration of the
sentence.
Executive Order 12866
The U.S. Parole Commission has determined that this proposed rule
does not constitute a significant rule within the meaning of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact upon
a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No action
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle
E--Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E--
Congressional Review Act), now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or
procedure that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
parole.
The Proposed Rule
Accordingly, the U.S. Parole Commission is proposing the following
amendment to 28 CFR part 2.
PART 2--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 2 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and 4204(a)(6).
2. Revise Sec. 2.208(a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.208 Termination of a term of supervised release.
(a) * * *
(2) Upon terminating supervision of a committed youth offender
before the sentence expires, the Commission shall set aside the
offender's conviction and issue a certificate setting aside the
conviction instead of a certificate of discharge. The Commission may
issue a set-aside certificate nunc pro tunc for a youth offender
previously under supervised release on the sentence and who was not
considered for early termination from supervision, using the criteria
stated at Sec. 2.106(f)(3). If the youth offender was sentenced only
to a term of incarceration without any supervision to follow release,
the Commission may issue a set-aside certificate after the expiration
of the sentence. In such cases, the Commission shall determine whether
to grant the set-aside certificate after considering factors such as
the offender's crime, criminal history, social and employment history,
record of institutional conduct, efforts at rehabilitation, and any
other relevant and available information.
* * * * *
Dated: May 11, 2010.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-12023 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P