Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D-9, -9A, -11, -15, -17, and -17R Turbofan Engines, 27972-27973 [2010-11999]
Download as PDF
27972
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Delegation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 5,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–11905 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0514; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–02–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney JT8D–9, –9A, –11, –15, –17,
and –17R Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D–9, –9A, –11,
–15, –17, and –17R turbofan engines.
This proposed AD would require
overhauling fan blade leading edges at
the first shop visit after 4,000 cycles-inservice (CIS) since the last total fan
blade overhaul was performed. This
proposed AD results from reports of
failed fan blades. We are proposing this
AD to prevent high-cycle fatigue
cracking at the blade root, which could
result in uncontained failures of first
stage fan blades and damage to the
airplane.
We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by July 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
Contact Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main
St., East Hartford, CT 06108; telephone
(860) 565–7700; fax (860) 565–1605, for
a copy of the service information
identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: james.gray@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7742; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2010–0514; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–02–AD’’ in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
We have received reports of 16 first
stage fan blade root fractures, two of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which resulted in penetration of the
cowl and minor damage to the fuselage.
Engineering investigation has
determined that increased vibratory
stress in the root and airfoil from eroded
and blunt leading edges caused the fan
blade failures. The primary cause of
leading edge erosion is the operating
environment, particularly rain and sand.
The aerodynamic performance of the
blade is diminished and vibratory stress
in the airfoil and root is increased. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in uncontained failures of first stage fan
blades and damage to the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of PW JT8D
Maintenance Advisory Notice MAN–
JT8D–2–06, dated November 20, 2006,
that describes procedures for
overhauling the first stage fan blades at
every shop visit where pairs of major
mating flanges are separated.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require overhauling the
total set of stage 1 fan blades at:
• The first shop visit after 4,000 CIS
since the last total stage 1 fan blade
overhaul or
• The next shop visit after the
effective date of this proposed AD if the
CIS since the last total stage 1 fan blade
overhaul is unknown and
• Thereafter, at the next shop visit
after 4,000 CIS since the last total stage
fan blade overhaul.
The proposed AD would require you
to use the service information described
previously to perform these actions.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 1,527 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 63
work-hours per engine to perform the
proposed actions, and that the average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. There
would be no required parts. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost
of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to
be $8,177,085.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
& WHITNEY: Docket No. FAA–2010–
0514; Directorate Identifier 2010–NE–
02–AD.
PRATT
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by July
19, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney
(PW) JT8D–9, –9A, –11, –15, –17, and –17R
turbofan engines. These engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Boeing 727 series,
Boeing 737–200 series and McDonnell
Douglas DC–9 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of failed
fan blades. We are issuing this AD to prevent
high-cycle fatigue cracking at the blade root,
which could result in uncontained failures of
first stage fan blades and damage to the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Overhaul
(f) For engines where the cycles-in-service
(CIS) since last overhaul are known, overhaul
the total set of stage 1 fan blades at the first
shop visit after 4,000 CIS since the last total
stage 1 fan blade overhaul, or the next shop
visit after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later. Guidance on
performing a fan blade overhaul can be found
in Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance
Advisory Notice, MAN–JT8D–2–06 and the
Engine Manual Chapter/Section 72–33–21,
Inspection 00.
(g) For engines where the CIS since last
overhaul are unknown, overhaul the total set
of stage 1 fan blades at the next shop visit
after the effective date of this AD. Guidance
on performing a fan blade overhaul can be
found in Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance
Advisory Notice, MAN–JT8D–2–06 and the
Engine Manual Chapter/Section 72–33–21,
Inspection 00.
Repetitive Overhaul
(h) Thereafter, overhaul the total set of
stage 1 fan blades at the first shop visit after
4,000 CIS since the last total stage 1 fan blade
overhaul. Guidance on performing a fan
blade overhaul can be found in Pratt &
Whitney JT8D Maintenance Advisory Notice,
MAN–JT8D–2–06 and the Engine Manual
Chapter/Section 72–33–21, Inspection 00.
Definitions
(i) For the purpose of this AD, a shop visit
is the induction of an engine into the shop
for maintenance involving the separation of
pairs of major mating engine flanges, except
that the separation of engine flanges solely
for the purposes of transporting the engine
without subsequent engine maintenance does
not constitute an engine shop visit.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27973
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(j) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(k) Contact James Gray, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: james.gray@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7742; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
(l) Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance
Advisory Notice MAN–JT8D–2–06, dated
November 20, 2006, pertains to the subject of
this AD. Contact Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main
St., East Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860)
565–7700; fax (860) 565–1605, for a copy of
this service information.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
May 13, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–11999 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0521; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NE–21–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc RB211–524C2 Series Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: A number of LPT casings
have been found cracked during engine
shop visit. Cracking of the LPT casing
reduces the capability of the casing to
contain debris in the event of an LPT
stage 1 blade failure. Therefore, blade
failure in an engine featuring a cracked
LPT casing may result in release of
uncontained high energy debris. For the
reason described above, this AD
requires repetitive inspections and
corrective actions, depending on
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27972-27973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11999]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0514; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-02-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D-9, -9A, -11, -15,
-17, and -17R Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D-9, -9A, -11, -15, -17, and -17R turbofan
engines. This proposed AD would require overhauling fan blade leading
edges at the first shop visit after 4,000 cycles-in-service (CIS) since
the last total fan blade overhaul was performed. This proposed AD
results from reports of failed fan blades. We are proposing this AD to
prevent high-cycle fatigue cracking at the blade root, which could
result in uncontained failures of first stage fan blades and damage to
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by July 19,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Contact Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108;
telephone (860) 565-7700; fax (860) 565-1605, for a copy of the service
information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
james.gray@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7742; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0514; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-02-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
We have received reports of 16 first stage fan blade root
fractures, two of which resulted in penetration of the cowl and minor
damage to the fuselage. Engineering investigation has determined that
increased vibratory stress in the root and airfoil from eroded and
blunt leading edges caused the fan blade failures. The primary cause of
leading edge erosion is the operating environment, particularly rain
and sand. The aerodynamic performance of the blade is diminished and
vibratory stress in the airfoil and root is increased. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in uncontained failures of first stage
fan blades and damage to the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of PW JT8D
Maintenance Advisory Notice MAN-JT8D-2-06, dated November 20, 2006,
that describes procedures for overhauling the first stage fan blades at
every shop visit where pairs of major mating flanges are separated.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
overhauling the total set of stage 1 fan blades at:
The first shop visit after 4,000 CIS since the last total
stage 1 fan blade overhaul or
The next shop visit after the effective date of this
proposed AD if the CIS since the last total stage 1 fan blade overhaul
is unknown and
Thereafter, at the next shop visit after 4,000 CIS since
the last total stage fan blade overhaul.
The proposed AD would require you to use the service information
described previously to perform these actions.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1,527 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 63 work-hours per engine to perform the proposed actions,
and that the average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. There would be no
required parts. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of
the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $8,177,085.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more
[[Page 27973]]
detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. FAA-2010-0514; Directorate Identifier
2010-NE-02-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by July 19,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D-9, -9A, -11, -
15, -17, and -17R turbofan engines. These engines are installed on,
but not limited to, Boeing 727 series, Boeing 737-200 series and
McDonnell Douglas DC-9 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of failed fan blades. We are
issuing this AD to prevent high-cycle fatigue cracking at the blade
root, which could result in uncontained failures of first stage fan
blades and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Overhaul
(f) For engines where the cycles-in-service (CIS) since last
overhaul are known, overhaul the total set of stage 1 fan blades at
the first shop visit after 4,000 CIS since the last total stage 1
fan blade overhaul, or the next shop visit after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later. Guidance on performing a fan
blade overhaul can be found in Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance
Advisory Notice, MAN-JT8D-2-06 and the Engine Manual Chapter/Section
72-33-21, Inspection 00.
(g) For engines where the CIS since last overhaul are unknown,
overhaul the total set of stage 1 fan blades at the next shop visit
after the effective date of this AD. Guidance on performing a fan
blade overhaul can be found in Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance
Advisory Notice, MAN-JT8D-2-06 and the Engine Manual Chapter/Section
72-33-21, Inspection 00.
Repetitive Overhaul
(h) Thereafter, overhaul the total set of stage 1 fan blades at
the first shop visit after 4,000 CIS since the last total stage 1
fan blade overhaul. Guidance on performing a fan blade overhaul can
be found in Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance Advisory Notice, MAN-
JT8D-2-06 and the Engine Manual Chapter/Section 72-33-21, Inspection
00.
Definitions
(i) For the purpose of this AD, a shop visit is the induction of
an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the separation of
pairs of major mating engine flanges, except that the separation of
engine flanges solely for the purposes of transporting the engine
without subsequent engine maintenance does not constitute an engine
shop visit.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(j) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(k) Contact James Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: james.gray@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238-7742; fax (781) 238-7199, for more information
about this AD.
(l) Pratt & Whitney JT8D Maintenance Advisory Notice MAN-JT8D-2-
06, dated November 20, 2006, pertains to the subject of this AD.
Contact Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108;
telephone (860) 565-7700; fax (860) 565-1605, for a copy of this
service information.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 13, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11999 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P