FM Table of Allotments, Fairbanks, Alaska, 27977-27978 [2010-11965]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:46 May 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 30, 2010. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2010–11984 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [DA 10–754; MB Docket No. 10–81; RM– 11600] FM Table of Allotments, Fairbanks, Alaska AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: This document sets forth a proposal to amend the FM Table of Allotments. The Commission requests comment on a petition filed by Educational Media Foundation proposing the allotment of FM Channels 224C2 and 232C2 as the thirteenth and fourteenth local service at Fairbanks, Alaska. Both stations can be allotted at Fairbanks in compliance with the Commission’s minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 9.4 km (5.9 miles) north of Fairbanks, at 64–55–20 North Latitude and 147–42–49 West Longitude. Concurrence in the allotments by the Government of Canada is required because the proposed allotments are located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.–Canadian border. See Supplementary Information infra. DATES: The deadline for filing comments is 30 days following publication in the Federal Register. Reply comments must be filed on or before 15 days following the deadline for initial comments. Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for petitioner as follows: Karen A. Ross, Esq., David D. Oxenford, Esq., Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20006. ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27977 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2180. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 10–81, adopted April 30, 2010, and released May 3, 2010. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY–B402, Washington, DC, 20554, (800) 378–3160, or via the company’s website, www.bcpiweb.com. This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506 (c)(4). The Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. § 73.202 [Amended] 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Alaska, is amended by adding Channels 224C2 and 232C2 at Fairbanks. E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM 19MYP1 27978 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 2010–11965 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 BILLING CODE 6712–01–S VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:46 May 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM 19MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27977-27978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 10-754; MB Docket No. 10-81; RM-11600]


FM Table of Allotments, Fairbanks, Alaska

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document sets forth a proposal to amend the FM Table of 
Allotments. The Commission requests comment on a petition filed by 
Educational Media Foundation proposing the allotment of FM Channels 
224C2 and 232C2 as the thirteenth and fourteenth local service at 
Fairbanks, Alaska. Both stations can be allotted at Fairbanks in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction of 9.4 km (5.9 miles) north of 
Fairbanks, at 64-55-20 North Latitude and 147-42-49 West Longitude. 
Concurrence in the allotments by the Government of Canada is required 
because the proposed allotments are located within 320 kilometers (199 
miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border. See Supplementary Information 
infra.

DATES: The deadline for filing comments is 30 days following 
publication in the Federal Register. Reply comments must be filed on or 
before 15 days following the deadline for initial comments.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., 
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, 
interested parties should serve counsel for petitioner as follows: 
Karen A. Ross, Esq., David D. Oxenford, Esq., Davis Wright Tremaine 
LLP, 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 10-81, adopted April 30, 
2010, and released May 3, 2010. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th 
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC, 20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's website, 
www.bcpiweb.com. This document does not contain proposed information 
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any 
proposed information collection burden ``for small business concerns 
with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business 
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506 
(c)(4).
    The Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not 
apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from 
the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is 
no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex 
parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this 
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [lsqb]Amended[rsqb]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Alaska, is 
amended by adding Channels 224C2 and 232C2 at Fairbanks.



[[Page 27978]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-11965 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.