Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program, 27949-27951 [2010-11383]
Download as PDF
27949
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 96
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 1980
RIN 0575–AC83
Single Family Housing Guaranteed
Loan Program
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service
proposes two changes to its Single
Family Housing Guaranteed Loan
Program (SFHGLP) regulation. This
action is taken to achieve savings for the
taxpayer, simplify regulations, and
promote efficiency in managing the
SFHGLP. The proposed changes are in
accordance with the recommendations
of the Inspector General in its Audit
(Number 04601–0017–CH) of April
2009.
Under the SFHGLP regulation as it
stands today, lenders may set an interest
rate for a loan under the SFHGLP that
either does not exceed the Lender’s
published rate for VA first mortgage
loans with no discount points or does
not exceed the current Federal National
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
posted yield for 90-day delivery
(Actual/Actual), plus six-tenths of 1
percent for 30-year fixed rate
conventional loans, rounded up to the
nearest one-quarter of 1 percent. The
first proposed rule change would
eliminate the lender’s published VA rate
for first mortgage loans with no discount
points as an option for a maximum
interest rate on loans. The effect of this
action would be to create a more
uniform, simpler standard for interest
rates under the SFHGLP, whereby
lenders would always use the current
Fannie Mae rate as the rate ceiling. The
Fannie Mae rate is the most widely
utilized interest rate guidance by
approved lenders. It is also the most
accessible to lenders and the Agency
when documenting loan files to ensure
affordable interest rates are extended to
Guaranteed Loan Program borrowers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
The second proposed change relates
to the rights of the Secretary when the
Secretary has to pay a claim under the
guarantee for the loan, but the original
lender did not originate the loan in
accordance with the program
requirements. The proposed rule change
would allow the Secretary in certain
circumstances to seek indemnification
from the originator of the loan for the
Secretary’s loss. This change promises
to save taxpayer money and incentivize
due care on the part of lenders by
allowing the Government to recoup the
funds it pays out in the event of a claim
under the guarantee where the original
lender did not comply with SFHGLP
requirements.
DATES: Written or e-mail comments on
the proposed rule must be received on
or before July 19, 2010.
You may submit comments
on this proposed rule by any one of the
following methods:
• E-Mail: comments@wdc.usda.gov.
Include ‘‘RIN No. 0575–AC83’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
electronically.
• Mail: Submit written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
written comments via Federal Express
mail, or other courier service requiring
a street address to the Branch Chief,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
ADDRESSES:
All written comments will be available
for public inspection during regular
work hours at the 300 7th Street, SW.,
7th Floor address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joaquin Tremols, Acting Director, Single
Family Housing Guaranteed Loan
Division, USDA Rural Development,
Room 2241, STOP 0784, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250, Telephone: (202) 720–1465,
E-mail: joaquin.tremols@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Classification
This proposed rule has been
determined to be non-significant by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Except where specified, all
State and local laws and regulations that
are in direct conflict with this rule will
be preempted. Federal funds carry
Federal requirements. No person is
required to apply for funding under this
program, but if they do apply and are
selected for funding, they must comply
with the requirements applicable to the
Federal program funds. This rule is not
retroactive. It will not affect agreements
entered into prior to the effective date
of the rule. Before any judicial action
may be brought regarding the provisions
of this rule, the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effect of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Agency generally must prepare a
written statement, including a costbenefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million, or
more, in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
Agency to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly,
most cost-effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
27950
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’ It
is the determination of the Agency that
this action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment, and,
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
Public Law 91–190, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
required.
Federalism—Executive Order 13132
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
national government and States, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments.
Therefore, consultation with the States
is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) the
undersigned has determined and
certified by signature of this document
that this rule change will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule does
not impose any significant new
requirements on Agency applicants and
borrowers, and the regulatory changes
affect only Agency determination of
program benefits for guarantees of loans
made to individuals.
Intergovernmental Consultation
This program/activity is not subject to
the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. (See the Notice related to 7
CFR part 3015, subpart V, at 48 FR
29112, June 24, 1983; 49 FR 22675, May
31, 1984; 50 FR 14088, April 10, 1985).
Programs Affected
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
Number 10.410, Very Low to Moderate
Income Housing Loans (Section 502
Rural Housing Loans).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection and record
keeping requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by OMB
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). The assigned OMB control
number is 0575–AC83.
E–Government Act Compliance
The Rural Housing Service is
committed to complying with the E-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
Government Act, to promote the use of
the Internet and other information
technologies to provide increased
opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services,
and for other purposes.
Background
In the spring of 2009, the Inspector
General completed an audit of the
controls over lending activities in the
SFHGLP. The audit was initiated
because of an investigation by the
Inspector General into a lender who
submitted false documents to the
Agency to obtain loan guarantees.
Additionally, the Inspector General was
concerned that some lenders were
setting interest rates on guaranteed
loans that were excessive and not in
compliance with Agency guidelines.
The audit evaluated the systems and
processes to ensure that lenders (1)
submit accurate and legitimate borrower
eligibility data and (2) set interest rates
on loans within Agency guidelines. The
audit report made a number of
recommendations for what the SFHGLP
can do to streamline operations, prevent
fraud, and improve efficiency in its
mission. In response to the audit, the
two rules presented here are being
proposed.
OMB Control Number
The report and recordkeeping
requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget and
have been assigned OMB control
number 0575–AC83.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1980
Home improvement, Loan Programs—
Housing and community development,
Mortgage insurance, Mortgages, Rural
areas.
For the reason stated in the preamble,
Chapter XVIII, Title 7 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 1980—RURAL HOUSING LOANS
1. The authority citation for part 1980
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart E also issued under 7 U.S.C. 1932(a).
Subpart D—Rural Housing Loans
2. Section 1980.308 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 1980.308
Full faith and credit.
(a) Loan note guarantee. The loan
note guarantee constitutes an obligation
supported by the full faith and credit of
the United States and is incontestable
except for fraud or misrepresentation of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which the Lender has actual knowledge
at the time it becomes such Lender or
which the Lender participates in or
condones. Misrepresentation includes
negligent misrepresentation. A note
which provides for the payment of
interest on interest shall not be
guaranteed. Any guarantee or
assignment of a guarantee attached to or
relating to a note which provides for the
payment of interest on interest is void.
Notwithstanding the prohibition of
interest on interest, interest may be
capitalized in connection with
reamortization over the remaining term
with written concurrence of RHS. The
loan note guarantee will be
unenforceable to the extent any loss is
occasioned by violation of usury laws,
negligent servicing, or failure to obtain
the required security regardless of the
time at which RHS acquires knowledge
of the foregoing. Negligent servicing is
defined as servicing that is inconsistent
with this subpart and includes the
failure to perform those services which
a reasonably prudent lender would
perform in servicing its own loan
portfolio of loans that are not
guaranteed. The term includes not only
the concept of a failure to act, but also
not acting in a timely manner or acting
contrary to the manner in which a
reasonably prudent lender would act up
to the time of loan maturity or until a
final loss is paid. Any losses occasioned
will be unenforceable to the extent that
loan funds are used for purposes other
than those authorized in this subpart.
When the lender conducts liquidation
in an expeditious manner, in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 1980.374 of this subpart, the loan note
guarantee shall cover interest until the
claim is paid within the limit of the
guarantee.
(b) Indemnification. If RHS
determines that a Lender did not
originate a loan in accordance with the
requirements in this subpart, and RHS
pays a claim under the loan guarantee,
RHS may revoke the Lender’s eligibility
status in accordance with § 1980.309 (h)
of this subpart and may also require the
Lender:
(1) To indemnify RHS for the loss, if
the payment under the guarantee was
made within 24 months of loan closing;
or
(2) To indemnify RHS for the loss
regardless of how long ago the loan
closed, if RHS determines that fraud or
misrepresentation was involved in
connection with the origination of the
loan.
3. Section 1980.320 is revised to read
as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 1980.320
Interest rate.
The interest rate must not exceed the
established, applicable usury rate. Loans
guaranteed under this subpart must bear
a fixed interest rate over the life of the
loan. The rate shall be agreed upon by
the borrower and the Lender and must
not be more than the current Fannie
Mae rate as defined in § 1980.302(a) of
this subpart. The Lender must
document the rate and the date it was
determined.
4. Section 1980.353 (c)(4) is revised to
read as follows:
§ 1980.353 Filing and processing
applications.
(c) * * *
(4) Anticipated loan rates and terms,
the date and amount of the Fannie Mae
rate used to determine the interest rate,
and the Lender’s certification that the
proposed rate is in compliance with
§ 1980.320 of this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 30, 2010.
˜
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–11383 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 652
RIN 3052–AC56
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Corporation Funding and Fiscal
Affairs; Farmer Mac Investments and
Liquidity
Farm Credit Administration.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Farm Credit
Administration (FCA, Agency, us, or
we) is considering amending our
regulations governing the Federal
Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
(Farmer Mac or the Corporation) nonprogram investments and liquidity
requirements. The objective of these
regulations is to ensure that Farmer Mac
holds an appropriate level of highquality, liquid investments to maintain
a sufficient liquidity reserve, invest
surplus funds, and manage interest rate
risk.
DATES: You may send us comments by
July 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: We offer a variety of
methods for you to submit comments on
this advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking. For accuracy and efficiency
reasons, commenters are encouraged to
submit comments by e-mail or through
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Agency’s Web site. As facsimiles
(fax) are difficult for us to process and
achieve compliance with section 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act, we are no longer
accepting comments submitted by fax.
Regardless of the method you use,
please do not submit your comment
multiple times via different methods.
You may submit comments by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: Send us an e-mail at regcomm@fca.gov.
• FCA Web site: https://www.fca.gov.
Select ‘‘Public Commenters,’’ then
‘‘Public Comments,’’ and follow the
directions for ‘‘Submitting a Comment.’’
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Joseph T. Connor, Associate
Director for Policy and Analysis, Office
of Secondary Market Oversight, Farm
Credit Administration, 1501 Farm
Credit Drive, McLean, VA 22102–5090.
You may review copies of all
comments we receive at our office in
McLean, Virginia, or on our Web site at
https://www.fca.gov. Once you are in the
Web site, select ‘‘Public Commenters,’’
then ‘‘Public Comments,’’ and follow the
directions for ‘‘Reading Submitted
Public Comments.’’ We will show your
comments as submitted, but for
technical reasons we may omit items
such as logos and special characters.
Identifying information that you
provide, such as phone numbers and
addresses, will be publicly available.
However, we will attempt to remove email addresses to help reduce Internet
spam.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph T. Connor, Associate Director for
Policy and Analysis, Office of
Secondary Market Oversight, Farm
Credit Administration, McLean, VA
22102–5090, (703) 883–4280, TTY
(703) 883–4056; or
Jennifer A. Cohn, Senior Counsel, Office
of General Counsel, Farm Credit
Administration, McLean, VA 22102–
5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY (703) 883–
4020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Objective
The objective of this ANPRM is to
solicit public comments on revisions
and updates to Farmer Mac’s nonprogram investment and liquidity
management regulations in light of
investment and liquidity risk issues that
arose during the recent financial crisis.
With the benefit of information gained
through this ANPRM and our internal
analysis, we will consider changes to
the regulations to enhance their
fundamental objective: to ensure the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27951
safety and soundness and continuity of
Farmer Mac operations.
II. Background
Congress established Farmer Mac in
1988 as part of its effort to resolve the
agricultural crisis of the 1980s. Congress
expected that establishing a secondary
market for agricultural and rural
housing mortgages would increase the
availability of competitively priced
mortgage credit to America’s farmers,
ranchers, and rural homeowners.
In addition to serving its investorstakeholders, Farmer Mac, like all
Government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), has a public policy purpose
embedded in its corporate mission that
arises from having been created by an
act of Congress. The public policy
component of its mission explicitly
includes its service to customerstakeholders (farmers, ranchers, rural
homeowners, and rural utility
cooperatives, all through their lenders).1
The public policy component also
includes protection of taxpayerstakeholders. The latter arises from
Farmer Mac’s ability to issue debt to the
Department of the Treasury to cover
guarantee losses under certain
circumstances.2 These two public policy
components of Farmer Mac’s mission
are, in some respects, counterbalancing,
as we now explain.
A fundamental premise of finance is
the natural positive relationship
between risk and expected return. This
means that when Farmer Mac increases
its expected return, it also increases its
risk of loss; the opposite is true when
risk decreases. More return, in general,
will better position Farmer Mac to
reduce the rates it charges customers (a
benefit to those stakeholders) and
increase its earnings (a benefit to
investor-stakeholders). However, the
risk Farmer Mac assumes to earn a
greater return increases the risk to
others, including ultimately taxpayers,
and thus adds an offsetting cost to these
earnings benefits.
In general, a guiding principle for
FCA in establishing regulations is to
maintain an appropriate balance
between these costs and benefits, i.e.,
attempting to maximize Farmer Mac’s
ability to serve its customers and
provide an appropriate return for
investors while ensuring that it engages
in safe and sound operations, thereby
providing a high degree of certainty that
Farmer Mac will continue to be able to
make its products available to serve
1 See title VIII of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as
amended (Act), 12 U.S.C. 2279aa–2279cc et seq.)
2 See section 8.13 of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27949-27951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11383]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 27949]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 1980
RIN 0575-AC83
Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service proposes two changes to its Single
Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) regulation. This action
is taken to achieve savings for the taxpayer, simplify regulations, and
promote efficiency in managing the SFHGLP. The proposed changes are in
accordance with the recommendations of the Inspector General in its
Audit (Number 04601-0017-CH) of April 2009.
Under the SFHGLP regulation as it stands today, lenders may set an
interest rate for a loan under the SFHGLP that either does not exceed
the Lender's published rate for VA first mortgage loans with no
discount points or does not exceed the current Federal National
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) posted yield for 90-day delivery
(Actual/Actual), plus six-tenths of 1 percent for 30-year fixed rate
conventional loans, rounded up to the nearest one-quarter of 1 percent.
The first proposed rule change would eliminate the lender's published
VA rate for first mortgage loans with no discount points as an option
for a maximum interest rate on loans. The effect of this action would
be to create a more uniform, simpler standard for interest rates under
the SFHGLP, whereby lenders would always use the current Fannie Mae
rate as the rate ceiling. The Fannie Mae rate is the most widely
utilized interest rate guidance by approved lenders. It is also the
most accessible to lenders and the Agency when documenting loan files
to ensure affordable interest rates are extended to Guaranteed Loan
Program borrowers.
The second proposed change relates to the rights of the Secretary
when the Secretary has to pay a claim under the guarantee for the loan,
but the original lender did not originate the loan in accordance with
the program requirements. The proposed rule change would allow the
Secretary in certain circumstances to seek indemnification from the
originator of the loan for the Secretary's loss. This change promises
to save taxpayer money and incentivize due care on the part of lenders
by allowing the Government to recoup the funds it pays out in the event
of a claim under the guarantee where the original lender did not comply
with SFHGLP requirements.
DATES: Written or e-mail comments on the proposed rule must be received
on or before July 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule by any one of
the following methods:
E-Mail: comments@wdc.usda.gov. Include ``RIN No. 0575-
AC83'' in the subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments electronically.
Mail: Submit written comments via the U.S. Postal Service
to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0742.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit written comments via Federal
Express mail, or other courier service requiring a street address to
the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20024.
All written comments will be available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joaquin Tremols, Acting Director,
Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division, USDA Rural Development,
Room 2241, STOP 0784, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20250, Telephone: (202) 720-1465, E-mail: joaquin.tremols@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Except where specified, all State and local laws and
regulations that are in direct conflict with this rule will be
preempted. Federal funds carry Federal requirements. No person is
required to apply for funding under this program, but if they do apply
and are selected for funding, they must comply with the requirements
applicable to the Federal program funds. This rule is not retroactive.
It will not affect agreements entered into prior to the effective date
of the rule. Before any judicial action may be brought regarding the
provisions of this rule, the administrative appeal provisions of 7 CFR
part 11 must be exhausted.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effect of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
Agency generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100
million, or more, in any one year. When such a statement is needed for
a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Agency to
identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives
and adopt the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
[[Page 27950]]
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' It is the determination of the
Agency that this action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, and, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public
Law 91-190, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental
Impact Statement is required.
Federalism--Executive Order 13132
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national
government and States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) the undersigned has determined and certified by signature of this
document that this rule change will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule does not impose any
significant new requirements on Agency applicants and borrowers, and
the regulatory changes affect only Agency determination of program
benefits for guarantees of loans made to individuals.
Intergovernmental Consultation
This program/activity is not subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State
and local officials. (See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V, at 48 FR 29112, June 24, 1983; 49 FR 22675, May 31, 1984; 50
FR 14088, April 10, 1985).
Programs Affected
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under Number 10.410, Very Low to Moderate Income Housing
Loans (Section 502 Rural Housing Loans).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection and record keeping requirements
contained in this regulation have been approved by OMB in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The
assigned OMB control number is 0575-AC83.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Rural Housing Service is committed to complying with the E-
Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.
Background
In the spring of 2009, the Inspector General completed an audit of
the controls over lending activities in the SFHGLP. The audit was
initiated because of an investigation by the Inspector General into a
lender who submitted false documents to the Agency to obtain loan
guarantees. Additionally, the Inspector General was concerned that some
lenders were setting interest rates on guaranteed loans that were
excessive and not in compliance with Agency guidelines. The audit
evaluated the systems and processes to ensure that lenders (1) submit
accurate and legitimate borrower eligibility data and (2) set interest
rates on loans within Agency guidelines. The audit report made a number
of recommendations for what the SFHGLP can do to streamline operations,
prevent fraud, and improve efficiency in its mission. In response to
the audit, the two rules presented here are being proposed.
OMB Control Number
The report and recordkeeping requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-AC83.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1980
Home improvement, Loan Programs--Housing and community development,
Mortgage insurance, Mortgages, Rural areas.
For the reason stated in the preamble, Chapter XVIII, Title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1980--RURAL HOUSING LOANS
1. The authority citation for part 1980 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989. Subpart E also
issued under 7 U.S.C. 1932(a).
Subpart D--Rural Housing Loans
2. Section 1980.308 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1980.308 Full faith and credit.
(a) Loan note guarantee. The loan note guarantee constitutes an
obligation supported by the full faith and credit of the United States
and is incontestable except for fraud or misrepresentation of which the
Lender has actual knowledge at the time it becomes such Lender or which
the Lender participates in or condones. Misrepresentation includes
negligent misrepresentation. A note which provides for the payment of
interest on interest shall not be guaranteed. Any guarantee or
assignment of a guarantee attached to or relating to a note which
provides for the payment of interest on interest is void.
Notwithstanding the prohibition of interest on interest, interest may
be capitalized in connection with reamortization over the remaining
term with written concurrence of RHS. The loan note guarantee will be
unenforceable to the extent any loss is occasioned by violation of
usury laws, negligent servicing, or failure to obtain the required
security regardless of the time at which RHS acquires knowledge of the
foregoing. Negligent servicing is defined as servicing that is
inconsistent with this subpart and includes the failure to perform
those services which a reasonably prudent lender would perform in
servicing its own loan portfolio of loans that are not guaranteed. The
term includes not only the concept of a failure to act, but also not
acting in a timely manner or acting contrary to the manner in which a
reasonably prudent lender would act up to the time of loan maturity or
until a final loss is paid. Any losses occasioned will be unenforceable
to the extent that loan funds are used for purposes other than those
authorized in this subpart. When the lender conducts liquidation in an
expeditious manner, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 1980.374
of this subpart, the loan note guarantee shall cover interest until the
claim is paid within the limit of the guarantee.
(b) Indemnification. If RHS determines that a Lender did not
originate a loan in accordance with the requirements in this subpart,
and RHS pays a claim under the loan guarantee, RHS may revoke the
Lender's eligibility status in accordance with Sec. 1980.309 (h) of
this subpart and may also require the Lender:
(1) To indemnify RHS for the loss, if the payment under the
guarantee was made within 24 months of loan closing; or
(2) To indemnify RHS for the loss regardless of how long ago the
loan closed, if RHS determines that fraud or misrepresentation was
involved in connection with the origination of the loan.
3. Section 1980.320 is revised to read as follows:
[[Page 27951]]
Sec. 1980.320 Interest rate.
The interest rate must not exceed the established, applicable usury
rate. Loans guaranteed under this subpart must bear a fixed interest
rate over the life of the loan. The rate shall be agreed upon by the
borrower and the Lender and must not be more than the current Fannie
Mae rate as defined in Sec. 1980.302(a) of this subpart. The Lender
must document the rate and the date it was determined.
4. Section 1980.353 (c)(4) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1980.353 Filing and processing applications.
(c) * * *
(4) Anticipated loan rates and terms, the date and amount of the
Fannie Mae rate used to determine the interest rate, and the Lender's
certification that the proposed rate is in compliance with Sec.
1980.320 of this subpart.
* * * * *
Dated: April 30, 2010.
Tammye Trevi[ntilde]o,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11383 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P