J.N. “Ding” Darling National Wildlife Refuge, Lee County, FL, 27576-27578 [2010-11684]
Download as PDF
27576
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
II. Data
OMB Control Number: None. This is
a new collection.
Title: State Water Resources Research
Institute Program Annual Application
and Reporting.
Type of Request: New.
Affected Public: The state water
resources research institutes authorized
by the Water Resources Research Act of
1983, as amended, and listed at https://
water.usgs.gov/wrri/institutes.html.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain benefits.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: We expect to receive 54
applications and award 54 grants per
year.
Estimated Annual Total Responses:
54.
Estimated Time per Response: 160
hours. This includes 80 hours per
applicant to prepare and submit the
annual application; and 80 hours (total)
per grantee to complete the annual
reports.
Annual Burden Hours: 8,640.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
III. Request for Comments
On December 29, 2009, we published
a Federal Register notice (74 FR 68860)
announcing that we would submit this
ICR to OMB for approval and soliciting
comments. The comment period closed
on March 1, 2010. We did not receive
any comments in response to that
notice.
We again invite comments concerning
this ICR on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the agency to perform its duties,
including whether the information is
useful; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden on the respondents, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at anytime. While you
can ask us in your comment to withhold
your personal identifying information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: May 10, 2010.
John E. Schefter,
Water Resources Research Act Program
Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2010–11620 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2010–N052; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
J.N. ‘‘Ding’’ Darling National Wildlife
Refuge, Lee County, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for J.N.
‘‘Ding’’ Darling National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) for public review and comment.
In the Draft CCP/EA, we describe the
alternative we propose to use to manage
this refuge for the 15 years following
approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Ms.
Cheri M. Ehrhardt, via U.S. mail at J.N.
‘‘Ding’’ Darling NWR, 1 Wildlife Drive,
Sanibel, FL 33957, or via e-mail at
DingDarlingCCP@fws.gov. Alternatively
you may download the document from
our Internet Site at https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning under ‘‘Draft
Documents.’’ Submit comments on the
Draft CCP/EA to the above postal
address or e-mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cheri M. Ehrhardt, Natural Resource
Planner, telephone: 321/861–2368; or
Mr. Paul Tritaik, Refuge Manager,
telephone: 239/472–1100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for J.N. ‘‘Ding’’ Darling NWR. We
started the process through a notice in
the Federal Register on June 27, 2007
(72 FR 35254), and extended the
comment period in a notice in the
Federal Register on April 2, 2008 (73 FR
17991). For more about the refuge, its
purposes, and our CCP process, please
see those notices.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife
refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with
a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
The 6,406.79-acre refuge supports
hundreds of species of wildlife and
plants, providing protection for 13
Federal-listed species and 49 Statelisted species, as well as for migratory
birds and native wildlife. It also
supports habitat diversity through
tropical hardwood forests, beaches,
mangrove swamps, mixed wetland
shrubs, salt marshes, open waters and
seagrass beds, and lakes and canals.
Comprising roughly half of Sanibel
Island and most of Buck Key, the J.N.
‘‘Ding’’ Darling NWR provides key
habitats supporting a variety of species
in a highly developed landscape. The
city of Sanibel, Lee County, SanibelCaptiva Conservation Foundation, and
the Service work together to continue
conservation work on Sanibel Island,
which is one of the top birding hot spots
in the nation, with beautiful beaches,
shelling, fishing, and wildlife. This
partnership has resulted in land use
planning to guide growth and
development, ensuring that future
generations will be able to enjoy the
special ambience and quiet harmony
that Sanibel Island offers.
The priority management issues
facing this refuge are addressed in the
Draft CCP/EA, including: (1) Increasing
and changing human population,
development of the landscape,
recreational uses and demands, and
associated impacts; (2) issues and
impacts associated with water quality,
water quantity, and timing of flows; (3)
invasion and spread of exotic, invasive,
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
and nuisance species; (4) climate change
impacts; (5) need for long-term
protection of important resources; (6)
declines in and threats to rare,
threatened, and endangered species; (7)
insufficient baseline wildlife and habitat
data and lack of a comprehensive
habitat management plan; and (8)
insufficient resources to address refuge
needs.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed four alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
Alternative C as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative A (Current Management, No
Action)
Alternative A would continue
management activities and programs at
levels similar to past management,
providing a baseline for the comparison
of the action alternatives. Funding and
staffing levels would remain similar to
current levels, and programs would
follow the same direction, emphasis,
and intensity as under current
management. Working with partners, we
would conduct several surveying and
monitoring activities, providing
information for a variety of birds;
juvenile and baitfish populations; and
key rare, threatened, and endangered
species. Habitat management activities
on the refuge would include an
impounded wetland reconnection/
mangrove restoration project,
impoundment management, prescribed
fire, fuel and fire-effect monitoring,
exotic plant control, limited water
quality monitoring, and limited ditch
clearing. Further, we would work with
the partners to address exotic, invasive,
and nuisance animals; water quality,
quantity, and timing of flows concerns;
and climate change. We would continue
to offer a robust visitor services
program, facilitating fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation, while continuing to use a
concessionaire to help provide these
opportunities. Management and use of
the Wilderness Area would continue.
We would work with numerous
governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and other
partners to foster and promote refuge
management goals, including through
existing management and cooperative
agreements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Alternative B (Native Wildlife and
Habitat Diversity)
Alternative B would expand or
initiate our management activities, with
a focus on native wildlife and habitat
diversity, providing a new focus for
refuge management actions, decisions,
and priorities. Increased surveying and
monitoring activities and increased
water management capabilities for the
impoundments, the Bailey Tract, and
the State Botanical Site would better
serve a variety of species. Habitat
management and restoration activities
would better provide for a mix of native
species. Control of exotic, invasive, and
nuisance plants and animals would be
expanded. Benefitting numerous species
and habitats of management concern,
we would expand activities to better
coordinate with the partners to address
water quality, quantity, and timing of
flows related to Lake Okeechobee
regulatory releases, drainage in the
Caloosahatchee Basin, local runoff
issues, water quality in Tarpon Bay and
on the refuge, and operation of the city
of Sanibel’s weir. With a focus on native
wildlife and habitat diversity, we would
utilize the best available science and
employ a strategic habitat conservation
approach to anticipate wildlife and
habitat adaptation tendencies and to
target management actions to facilitate
successful adaptation responses to the
impacts of climate change. We would
better protect the archaeological and
historical resources of the refuge on
Sanibel and Captiva Islands, including
conducting a complete archaeological
and historical resources survey and
protecting in perpetuity the historically
significant site of ‘‘Ding’’ Darling’s
fishing cabin off Captiva Island. We
would complete the approved
acquisition boundary; develop
management agreements to protect key
resources; and pursue additional special
designations for the refuge, including
Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve
Network and RAMSAR Wetlands of
International Importance. We would
enhance our Wilderness Area program.
Although we currently have a robust
visitor services program, Alternative B
would focus more on native wildlife
and habitat diversity and the
minimization of human impacts on
these resources. In general, existing
visitor uses would continue, including
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation, while we
would increase efforts to improve
ethical behavior, expand and enhance
education and outreach activities, and
maintain the concession approach to
facilitating visitor activities and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27577
experiences. To provide additional
visitor opportunities, we would locate
and develop an observation tower at the
Bailey Tract. The Wildlife Drive would
be evaluated for any needed changes.
We would evaluate the need for and
ability to provide parking at the Shell
Mound Trail to address existing ad-hoc
parking and Wildlife Drive congestion
issues at this site. We would convert the
temporary fee-funded law enforcement
officer position to a permanent position
and add five refuge-specific staff:
Wildlife biologist, biological science
technician, two law enforcement
officers, and park ranger (Environmental
Education/Outreach). Historically, a
single commercial bait fisherman has
operated on the refuge. In line with
regional compatibility guidance and to
limit the impacts from commercial
fishing activities, we would phase out
commercial bait fishing activities from
the refuge during the life of the CCP.
Alternative C (Migratory Birds, Proposed
Action)
Alternative C would expand
management with a focus on the needs
of migratory birds, providing direction
for management actions, decisions, and
priorities, and prioritizing migratory
birds in all restoration plans. This
alternative addresses the management
needs of all birds covered under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, including
resident species of native birds that are
found using the refuge year-round.
Expanded and new surveying and
monitoring activities, habitat
management, and habitat restoration
would benefit a variety of species,
including rare, threatened, and
endangered species, with an emphasis
on migratory birds. Increased water
management capabilities for the
impoundments, the Bailey Tract, and
the State Botanical Site would also
benefit a variety of species,
predominantly migratory birds. Control
of exotic, invasive, and nuisance plants
and animals would be expanded, with
a focus on migratory birds. To benefit
migratory birds while also serving
numerous species and habitats of
management concern, we would expand
activities to better coordinate with the
partners to address water quality,
quantity, and timing of flows related to
Lake Okeechobee regulatory releases,
drainage in the Caloosahatchee Basin,
local runoff issues, water quality in
Tarpon Bay and on the refuge, and
operation of the city of Sanibel’s weir.
We would work with partners to
evaluate water quality impacts on algal
blooms, bird usage, seagrasses, and fish
populations in and around the refuge.
With a focus on migratory birds, we
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
27578
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
would utilize the best available science
and employ a strategic habitat
conservation approach to anticipate
wildlife and habitat adaptation
tendencies and to target management
actions to facilitate successful
adaptation responses to the impacts of
climate change. We would better protect
the archaeological and historical
resources of the refuge on Sanibel and
Captiva Islands, including conducting a
complete archaeological and historical
resources survey and protecting in
perpetuity the historically significant
site of ‘‘Ding’’ Darling’s fishing cabin off
Captiva Island. We would complete the
approved acquisition boundary, with a
focus on migratory birds; develop
management agreements to protect key
resources, including nesting and
roosting areas; and pursue additional
special designations for the refuge,
including Western Hemisphere
Shorebird Reserve Network and
RAMSAR Wetlands of International
Importance. We would enhance our
Wilderness Area program. Although we
currently have a robust visitor services
program, Alternative C would focus
more on migratory birds and the
minimization of human impacts on
these resources. In general, existing
visitor uses would continue, including
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation, while we
would increase our efforts to improve
ethical behavior, expand and enhance
education and outreach activities, and
maintain the concession approach to
facilitating visitor activities and
experiences. To provide additional
visitor opportunities, we would locate
and develop an observation tower at the
Bailey Tract and a handicappedaccessible fishing pier at Smith Pond on
the Bailey Tract. The Wildlife Drive
would be evaluated for any needed
changes. Further, we would evaluate the
need for and ability to provide parking
at the Shell Mound Trail to address
existing ad-hoc parking and Wildlife
Drive congestion issues at this site. We
would convert the temporary fee-funded
law enforcement officer position to a
permanent position and would add five
refuge-specific staff: Wildlife biologist,
biological science technician, two law
enforcement officers, and park ranger
(Environmental Education/Outreach).
Historically, a single commercial bait
fisherman has operated on the refuge. In
line with regional compatibility
guidance and to limit the impacts from
commercial fishing activities, we would
phase out commercial bait fishing
activities from the refuge during the life
of the CCP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Alternative D (Rare, Threatened, and
Endangered Species)
Alternative D would focus on
initiating and increasing management
actions that promote the recovery of
rare, threatened, and endangered
species occurring within the refuge,
providing a new direction for
management actions, decisions, and
priorities. Expanded and initiated
surveying and monitoring efforts,
habitat management, habitat restoration,
and research would benefit a variety of
species, with an emphasis on rare,
threatened, and endangered species.
Control of exotic, invasive, and
nuisance plants and animals would be
expanded under Alternative D, with a
focus on high-priority habitats serving
rare, threatened, and endangered
species. To benefit rare, threatened, and
endangered species while also serving
numerous species and habitats of
management concern, we would expand
activities to better coordinate with
partners to address water quality,
quantity, and timing of flows related to
Lake Okeechobee regulatory releases,
drainage in the Caloosahatchee Basin,
local runoff issues, water quality in
Tarpon Bay and the refuge, and
operation of the city of Sanibel’s weir.
We would work with partners to
evaluate water quality impacts on algal
blooms, bird usage, seagrasses, and fish
populations in and around the refuge to
better understand the impacts on rare,
threatened, and endangered species. We
would coordinate with researchers and
the partners to understand the impacts
of climate change on refuge resources
with a focus on rare, threatened, and
endangered species, fostering and
conducting research as possible,
establishing benchmarks, and adapting
management. We would better protect
the archaeological and historical
resources of the refuge on Sanibel and
Captiva Islands, including conducting a
complete archaeological and historical
resources survey and protecting in
perpetuity of the historically significant
site of ‘‘Ding’’ Darling’s fishing cabin off
Captiva Island. We would complete the
approved acquisition boundary; develop
management agreements to protect key
resources; and pursue additional special
designations for the refuge, including
Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve
Network and RAMSAR Wetlands of
International Importance. In addition,
we would expand our Wilderness Area
program. Although we currently have a
robust visitor services program,
Alternative D would focus more on rare,
threatened, and endangered species and
the minimization of human impacts on
these resources. In general, existing
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
visitor uses would continue, including
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation, while we
would increase efforts to improve
ethical behavior, expand and enhance
education and outreach activities, and
maintain the concession approach to
facilitating visitor activities and
experiences. To provide additional
visitor opportunities, we would locate
and develop an observation tower at the
Bailey Tract. The Wildlife Drive would
be evaluated for any needed changes.
Further, we would evaluate the need for
and ability to provide parking at the
Shell Mound Trail to address existing
ad-hoc parking and Wildlife Drive
congestion issues at this site. To help
accomplish the outlined actions,
Alternative D would be similar to
Alternatives B and C. We would convert
the temporary fee-funded law
enforcement officer position to a
permanent position and would add five
refuge-specific staff: Wildlife biologist,
biological science technician, two law
enforcement officers, and park ranger
(Environmental Education/Outreach).
Historically, a single commercial bait
fisherman has operated on the refuge. In
line with regional compatibility
guidance and to limit the impacts from
commercial fishing activities, we would
phase out commercial bait fishing
activities from the refuge during the life
of the CCP.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the
authority of the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, Public Law 105–57.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Mark J. Musaus,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–11684 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27576-27578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2010-N052; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
J.N. ``Ding'' Darling National Wildlife Refuge, Lee County, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for J.N. ``Ding'' Darling
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) for public review and comment. In the
Draft CCP/EA, we describe the alternative we propose to use to manage
this refuge for the 15 years following approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Ms.
Cheri M. Ehrhardt, via U.S. mail at J.N. ``Ding'' Darling NWR, 1
Wildlife Drive, Sanibel, FL 33957, or via e-mail at
DingDarlingCCP@fws.gov. Alternatively you may download the document
from our Internet Site at https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
``Draft Documents.'' Submit comments on the Draft CCP/EA to the above
postal address or e-mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cheri M. Ehrhardt, Natural
Resource Planner, telephone: 321/861-2368; or Mr. Paul Tritaik, Refuge
Manager, telephone: 239/472-1100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for J.N. ``Ding''
Darling NWR. We started the process through a notice in the Federal
Register on June 27, 2007 (72 FR 35254), and extended the comment
period in a notice in the Federal Register on April 2, 2008 (73 FR
17991). For more about the refuge, its purposes, and our CCP process,
please see those notices.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for each national
wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management,
conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to
outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their
habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15
years in accordance with the Administration Act.
The 6,406.79-acre refuge supports hundreds of species of wildlife
and plants, providing protection for 13 Federal-listed species and 49
State-listed species, as well as for migratory birds and native
wildlife. It also supports habitat diversity through tropical hardwood
forests, beaches, mangrove swamps, mixed wetland shrubs, salt marshes,
open waters and seagrass beds, and lakes and canals. Comprising roughly
half of Sanibel Island and most of Buck Key, the J.N. ``Ding'' Darling
NWR provides key habitats supporting a variety of species in a highly
developed landscape. The city of Sanibel, Lee County, Sanibel-Captiva
Conservation Foundation, and the Service work together to continue
conservation work on Sanibel Island, which is one of the top birding
hot spots in the nation, with beautiful beaches, shelling, fishing, and
wildlife. This partnership has resulted in land use planning to guide
growth and development, ensuring that future generations will be able
to enjoy the special ambience and quiet harmony that Sanibel Island
offers.
The priority management issues facing this refuge are addressed in
the Draft CCP/EA, including: (1) Increasing and changing human
population, development of the landscape, recreational uses and
demands, and associated impacts; (2) issues and impacts associated with
water quality, water quantity, and timing of flows; (3) invasion and
spread of exotic, invasive,
[[Page 27577]]
and nuisance species; (4) climate change impacts; (5) need for long-
term protection of important resources; (6) declines in and threats to
rare, threatened, and endangered species; (7) insufficient baseline
wildlife and habitat data and lack of a comprehensive habitat
management plan; and (8) insufficient resources to address refuge
needs.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our Proposed Alternative
We developed four alternatives for managing the refuge and chose
Alternative C as the proposed alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We summarize each alternative
below.
Alternative A (Current Management, No Action)
Alternative A would continue management activities and programs at
levels similar to past management, providing a baseline for the
comparison of the action alternatives. Funding and staffing levels
would remain similar to current levels, and programs would follow the
same direction, emphasis, and intensity as under current management.
Working with partners, we would conduct several surveying and
monitoring activities, providing information for a variety of birds;
juvenile and baitfish populations; and key rare, threatened, and
endangered species. Habitat management activities on the refuge would
include an impounded wetland reconnection/mangrove restoration project,
impoundment management, prescribed fire, fuel and fire-effect
monitoring, exotic plant control, limited water quality monitoring, and
limited ditch clearing. Further, we would work with the partners to
address exotic, invasive, and nuisance animals; water quality,
quantity, and timing of flows concerns; and climate change. We would
continue to offer a robust visitor services program, facilitating
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental
education and interpretation, while continuing to use a concessionaire
to help provide these opportunities. Management and use of the
Wilderness Area would continue. We would work with numerous
governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and other
partners to foster and promote refuge management goals, including
through existing management and cooperative agreements.
Alternative B (Native Wildlife and Habitat Diversity)
Alternative B would expand or initiate our management activities,
with a focus on native wildlife and habitat diversity, providing a new
focus for refuge management actions, decisions, and priorities.
Increased surveying and monitoring activities and increased water
management capabilities for the impoundments, the Bailey Tract, and the
State Botanical Site would better serve a variety of species. Habitat
management and restoration activities would better provide for a mix of
native species. Control of exotic, invasive, and nuisance plants and
animals would be expanded. Benefitting numerous species and habitats of
management concern, we would expand activities to better coordinate
with the partners to address water quality, quantity, and timing of
flows related to Lake Okeechobee regulatory releases, drainage in the
Caloosahatchee Basin, local runoff issues, water quality in Tarpon Bay
and on the refuge, and operation of the city of Sanibel's weir. With a
focus on native wildlife and habitat diversity, we would utilize the
best available science and employ a strategic habitat conservation
approach to anticipate wildlife and habitat adaptation tendencies and
to target management actions to facilitate successful adaptation
responses to the impacts of climate change. We would better protect the
archaeological and historical resources of the refuge on Sanibel and
Captiva Islands, including conducting a complete archaeological and
historical resources survey and protecting in perpetuity the
historically significant site of ``Ding'' Darling's fishing cabin off
Captiva Island. We would complete the approved acquisition boundary;
develop management agreements to protect key resources; and pursue
additional special designations for the refuge, including Western
Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network and RAMSAR Wetlands of
International Importance. We would enhance our Wilderness Area program.
Although we currently have a robust visitor services program,
Alternative B would focus more on native wildlife and habitat diversity
and the minimization of human impacts on these resources. In general,
existing visitor uses would continue, including fishing, wildlife
observation and photography, and environmental education and
interpretation, while we would increase efforts to improve ethical
behavior, expand and enhance education and outreach activities, and
maintain the concession approach to facilitating visitor activities and
experiences. To provide additional visitor opportunities, we would
locate and develop an observation tower at the Bailey Tract. The
Wildlife Drive would be evaluated for any needed changes. We would
evaluate the need for and ability to provide parking at the Shell Mound
Trail to address existing ad-hoc parking and Wildlife Drive congestion
issues at this site. We would convert the temporary fee-funded law
enforcement officer position to a permanent position and add five
refuge-specific staff: Wildlife biologist, biological science
technician, two law enforcement officers, and park ranger
(Environmental Education/Outreach). Historically, a single commercial
bait fisherman has operated on the refuge. In line with regional
compatibility guidance and to limit the impacts from commercial fishing
activities, we would phase out commercial bait fishing activities from
the refuge during the life of the CCP.
Alternative C (Migratory Birds, Proposed Action)
Alternative C would expand management with a focus on the needs of
migratory birds, providing direction for management actions, decisions,
and priorities, and prioritizing migratory birds in all restoration
plans. This alternative addresses the management needs of all birds
covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, including resident species
of native birds that are found using the refuge year-round. Expanded
and new surveying and monitoring activities, habitat management, and
habitat restoration would benefit a variety of species, including rare,
threatened, and endangered species, with an emphasis on migratory
birds. Increased water management capabilities for the impoundments,
the Bailey Tract, and the State Botanical Site would also benefit a
variety of species, predominantly migratory birds. Control of exotic,
invasive, and nuisance plants and animals would be expanded, with a
focus on migratory birds. To benefit migratory birds while also serving
numerous species and habitats of management concern, we would expand
activities to better coordinate with the partners to address water
quality, quantity, and timing of flows related to Lake Okeechobee
regulatory releases, drainage in the Caloosahatchee Basin, local runoff
issues, water quality in Tarpon Bay and on the refuge, and operation of
the city of Sanibel's weir. We would work with partners to evaluate
water quality impacts on algal blooms, bird usage, seagrasses, and fish
populations in and around the refuge. With a focus on migratory birds,
we
[[Page 27578]]
would utilize the best available science and employ a strategic habitat
conservation approach to anticipate wildlife and habitat adaptation
tendencies and to target management actions to facilitate successful
adaptation responses to the impacts of climate change. We would better
protect the archaeological and historical resources of the refuge on
Sanibel and Captiva Islands, including conducting a complete
archaeological and historical resources survey and protecting in
perpetuity the historically significant site of ``Ding'' Darling's
fishing cabin off Captiva Island. We would complete the approved
acquisition boundary, with a focus on migratory birds; develop
management agreements to protect key resources, including nesting and
roosting areas; and pursue additional special designations for the
refuge, including Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network and
RAMSAR Wetlands of International Importance. We would enhance our
Wilderness Area program. Although we currently have a robust visitor
services program, Alternative C would focus more on migratory birds and
the minimization of human impacts on these resources. In general,
existing visitor uses would continue, including fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation, while we would increase our efforts to improve ethical
behavior, expand and enhance education and outreach activities, and
maintain the concession approach to facilitating visitor activities and
experiences. To provide additional visitor opportunities, we would
locate and develop an observation tower at the Bailey Tract and a
handicapped-accessible fishing pier at Smith Pond on the Bailey Tract.
The Wildlife Drive would be evaluated for any needed changes. Further,
we would evaluate the need for and ability to provide parking at the
Shell Mound Trail to address existing ad-hoc parking and Wildlife Drive
congestion issues at this site. We would convert the temporary fee-
funded law enforcement officer position to a permanent position and
would add five refuge-specific staff: Wildlife biologist, biological
science technician, two law enforcement officers, and park ranger
(Environmental Education/Outreach). Historically, a single commercial
bait fisherman has operated on the refuge. In line with regional
compatibility guidance and to limit the impacts from commercial fishing
activities, we would phase out commercial bait fishing activities from
the refuge during the life of the CCP.
Alternative D (Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species)
Alternative D would focus on initiating and increasing management
actions that promote the recovery of rare, threatened, and endangered
species occurring within the refuge, providing a new direction for
management actions, decisions, and priorities. Expanded and initiated
surveying and monitoring efforts, habitat management, habitat
restoration, and research would benefit a variety of species, with an
emphasis on rare, threatened, and endangered species. Control of
exotic, invasive, and nuisance plants and animals would be expanded
under Alternative D, with a focus on high-priority habitats serving
rare, threatened, and endangered species. To benefit rare, threatened,
and endangered species while also serving numerous species and habitats
of management concern, we would expand activities to better coordinate
with partners to address water quality, quantity, and timing of flows
related to Lake Okeechobee regulatory releases, drainage in the
Caloosahatchee Basin, local runoff issues, water quality in Tarpon Bay
and the refuge, and operation of the city of Sanibel's weir. We would
work with partners to evaluate water quality impacts on algal blooms,
bird usage, seagrasses, and fish populations in and around the refuge
to better understand the impacts on rare, threatened, and endangered
species. We would coordinate with researchers and the partners to
understand the impacts of climate change on refuge resources with a
focus on rare, threatened, and endangered species, fostering and
conducting research as possible, establishing benchmarks, and adapting
management. We would better protect the archaeological and historical
resources of the refuge on Sanibel and Captiva Islands, including
conducting a complete archaeological and historical resources survey
and protecting in perpetuity of the historically significant site of
``Ding'' Darling's fishing cabin off Captiva Island. We would complete
the approved acquisition boundary; develop management agreements to
protect key resources; and pursue additional special designations for
the refuge, including Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network and
RAMSAR Wetlands of International Importance. In addition, we would
expand our Wilderness Area program. Although we currently have a robust
visitor services program, Alternative D would focus more on rare,
threatened, and endangered species and the minimization of human
impacts on these resources. In general, existing visitor uses would
continue, including fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation, while we
would increase efforts to improve ethical behavior, expand and enhance
education and outreach activities, and maintain the concession approach
to facilitating visitor activities and experiences. To provide
additional visitor opportunities, we would locate and develop an
observation tower at the Bailey Tract. The Wildlife Drive would be
evaluated for any needed changes. Further, we would evaluate the need
for and ability to provide parking at the Shell Mound Trail to address
existing ad-hoc parking and Wildlife Drive congestion issues at this
site. To help accomplish the outlined actions, Alternative D would be
similar to Alternatives B and C. We would convert the temporary fee-
funded law enforcement officer position to a permanent position and
would add five refuge-specific staff: Wildlife biologist, biological
science technician, two law enforcement officers, and park ranger
(Environmental Education/Outreach). Historically, a single commercial
bait fisherman has operated on the refuge. In line with regional
compatibility guidance and to limit the impacts from commercial fishing
activities, we would phase out commercial bait fishing activities from
the refuge during the life of the CCP.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the authority of the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105-57.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Mark J. Musaus,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-11684 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P