Standards of Conduct, 27456-27463 [2010-11599]
Download as PDF
27456
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 94
Monday, May 17, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
5 CFR Chapter XXXVII
11 CFR Part 7
[NOTICE 2010–05]
RIN 3209–AA15
Standards of Conduct
Federal Election Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Federal Election
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FEC’’),
with the concurrence of the office of
Government Ethics (‘‘OGE’’), seeks
comments on proposed revisions to the
‘‘Standards of Conduct,’’ which are the
FEC rules that govern the conduct of
Commissioners and Commission
employees. The proposed rules would
update the Commission’s current
regulations to reflect statutory changes
enacted after the Standards of Conduct
were originally promulgated in 1986,
and to conform to regulations issued by
OGE and the Office of Personnel
Management (‘‘OPM’’). OGE’s
regulations establish a government-wide
standard of ethical conduct for the
Executive Branch and independent
agencies, and are known as OGE’s
Standards of Ethical Conduct. In
addition to the proposed revisions to the
FEC’s Standards of Conduct, the
Commission, with OGE’s concurrence,
is also proposing new rules that would
supplement, for Commissioners and
employees of the FEC, the OGE
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch. The
proposed rules that follow do not
represent a final decision by the
Commission or OGE on the issues
presented by this rulemaking. The
supplementary information that follows
provides further information.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be in
writing, must be addressed to Robert M.
Knop, Assistant General Counsel, and
must be submitted in e-mail, facsimile,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
or paper copy form. Commenters are
strongly encouraged to submit
comments by e-mail or fax to ensure
timely receipt and consideration. E-mail
comments must be sent to
ethicsrules@fec.gov. If e-mail comments
include an attachment, the attachment
must be in either Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
or Microsoft Word (.doc) format. Faxed
comments must be sent to (202) 219–
3923, with paper copy follow-up. Paper
comments and paper copy follow-up of
faxed comments must be sent to the
Federal Election Commission, 999 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463. All
comments must include the full name
and postal service address of the
commenter or they will not be
considered. The Commission will post
comments on its Web site after the
comment period ends.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert M. Knop, Assistant General
Counsel, or Attorneys Mr. Anthony T.
Buckley or Mr. Ethan A. Carrier, 999 E
Street, NW., Washington DC 20463,
(202) 694–1650 or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview of OGE Rules
Implementing the Ethics Reform Act
and Proposed FEC Supplemental Rules
A. Legal Authority
The Ethics Reform Act of 1989 1
includes restrictions on gifts, travel,
outside activities, and outside
employment. See Public Law 101–194,
tit. III and VI, 103 Stat. 1716 (1989). It
authorizes the Office of Government
Ethics (‘‘OGE’’) to implement regulations
concerning the conduct of executive
branch employees. See 5 U.S.C. 7351(c).
In 1992, OGE issued a final rule setting
forth uniform standards of ethical
conduct and an interim final rule on
financial disclosure, and in 1996 issued
a final rule on financial interests, all for
executive branch departments and
agencies of the Federal Government and
their employees. These three executive
branch-wide regulations, as corrected
and amended, are codified at 5 CFR
parts 2634, 2635, and 2640.2
Law 101–194, 103 Stat. 1716 (1989).
before Congress passed the Ethics
Reform Act, the President issued Executive Order
12674, which sets forth basic principles of ethical
conduct for Federal employees and requires OGE to
promulgate ‘‘regulations that establish a single,
comprehensive, and clear set of executive-branch
standards of conduct.’’ E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159,
15160 (Apr. 12, 1989). This Executive Order was
The OGE regulations implementing
the Ethics Reform Act supersede any
agency standards of conduct regulations
previously issued and therefore
supersede, with some exceptions, the
Commission’s current regulations in 11
CFR part 7. Although agencies may still
issue regulations to supplement OGE’s
Standards of Ethical Conduct in order to
accommodate specific agency needs,
these regulations must be issued in
accordance with OGE’s rules, and must
be submitted to OGE for prior approval.
See 5 CFR 2635.105(a) and (b). Agencies
may, however, retain any regulations
based on their own separate statutory
authority or that address different, nonethics matters.
B. Topics Addressed in OGE and OPM
Regulations
OGE regulations address gifts from
outside sources, gifts between
employees, conflicting financial
interests, impartiality in performing
official duties, pursuit of other
employment, misuse of position, and
outside employment and activities. See
5 CFR part 2635.3
In addition to OGE’s Standards of
Conduct, Commission employees are
subject to certain rules issued by OPM
concerning employee responsibilities
and conduct. See 5 CFR part 735. These
OPM rules address restrictions on
certain gambling activities, conduct
prejudicial to the government, and
unauthorized examination training for
individuals preparing to take civil and
Foreign Service examinations. See 5
CFR part 735.
FEC and OGE have determined that
the following proposed supplemental
regulations are necessary and
appropriate in view of FEC’s programs
and operations and to fulfill the
purposes of the OGE standards. The
supplemental regulations proposed will
be issued in new chapter XXXVII of title
5 of the CFR. In addition, the FEC is
revising its current regulations at 11
CFR part 7 to conform to the OGE and
OPM regulations, without
compromising the Commission’s
essential independence in its core
1 Public
2 Shortly
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
later modified. E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547 (Oct. 17,
1990). OGE’s regulations also implement Executive
Order 12674, as modified by Executive Order
12731.
3 The remainder of this section is only a brief
summary. Important additional restrictions and
exceptions may apply. Readers should consult the
cited regulations for further information.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mission of administering Federal
campaign finance laws.
II. Analysis of the Proposed Regulations
The following discussion explains the
Commission’s proposal to amend the
rules that govern the conduct of
Commissioners and Commission
employees by adding supplemental
regulations in a new chapter XXXVII of
5 CFR, consisting of part 4701, and by
revising the Commission’s Standards of
Conduct in 11 CFR part 7. The
Commission seeks comment on the
proposed rules.
A. Proposed Supplemental Regulations
in 5 CFR part 4701
1. Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101—Scope
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101 states the
authority for the supplemental
regulations, which includes 2 U.S.C.
437c(a)(3), 5 U.S.C. 7301, and 5 U.S.C.
App. (Ethics in Government Act of
1978). Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101(a)
indicates that the regulations of 5 CFR
part 4701 apply to both members of the
Commission (‘‘Commissioners’’) and
employees of the Commission. Proposed
5 CFR 4701.101(b) lists some of the
other regulations in title 5 and 11 CFR
part 7 that would govern the ethical
conduct of Commissioners and
employees.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102—Prior
Approval for Certain Outside
Employment and Activities
The OGE Standards of Ethical
Conduct supersede the Commission’s
current regulation at 11 CFR 7.9(f)
concerning prior approval for outside
employment and activities. However, an
agency may issue supplemental
regulations with OGE’s concurrence that
require the agency’s employees to obtain
approval before engaging in outside
employment or activities. See 5 CFR
2635.105 and 2635.803.
The Commission has found the
current approval requirement for
outside employment or activities useful
in ensuring that the outside
employment and activities of its
employees conform to all applicable
laws and regulations. Because that
requirement is deemed necessary to the
administration of its ethics program, the
Commission, with the concurrence of
OGE, proposes to renew its requirement
for prior approval of certain outside
employment and activities, and to issue
a supplemental regulation in accordance
with 5 CFR 2635.803 at proposed 5 CFR
4701.102.
Proposed section 4701.102 would
differ significantly from current 11 CFR
7.9(f). The major difference is in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
scope of the outside employment and
activities covered by the proposed
regulation. Current 11 CFR 7.9(f)
requires Commission employees to
obtain prior approval for all outside
employment and activities. The term
‘‘outside employment or other outside
activity’’ is defined broadly at current 11
CFR 7.2(h) to include ‘‘any work, service
or other activity performed by an
employee.’’ In contrast, proposed 5 CFR
4701.102 requires prior approval from
the Designated Agency Ethics Official
(‘‘DAEO’’) only for outside activities that
are related to the employee’s official
duties or involve the application of the
same specialized skills or the same
educational background as used in the
performance of the employee’s official
duties. This rule, which draws on
portions of prior approval regulations
adopted by several other Federal
agencies with OGE concurrence, is
narrowly constructed to address agency
concerns, while limiting the
administrative burdens placed on
employees. See, e.g., 5 CFR 3801.106
(Department of Justice); 5 CFR 4501.103
(OPM); 5 CFR 6301.102 (Department of
Education); and 5 CFR 8601.102
(Federal Retirement Thrift Investment
Board).
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a) would
set out the definitions of the terms used
in proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(b). The
definitions for ‘‘active participant,’’
‘‘employee,’’ and ‘‘related to the
employee’s official duties’’ refer back to
the definitions of these terms used in
the general standards of conduct
regulations issued by OGE.
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a)(2) would
define ‘‘employee’’ as defined in OGE’s
regulation at 5 CFR 2635.102(h), which
includes ‘‘any officer or employee of an
agency.’’ This definition includes
Commissioners. However, proposed
section 4701.102(b) would exclude
Commissioners from its procedures.4
Instead, proposed 11 CFR 7.6, discussed
below, would address outside
employment and activities by
Commissioners.
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a)(3) would
define ‘‘outside employment’’ to mean
any form of non-Federal employment,
business relationship or activity
involving the provision of personal
services, with or without compensation,
other than in the discharge of official
duties. The proposed definition
provides a non-exhaustive list of
services such as serving as a lawyer,
officer, director, trustee, agent,
4 The Act already restricts outside activities of
Commissioners. See 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3). Regulations
implementing this provision are already in place,
see 11 CFR 7.9, and are being reassigned in this
rulemaking. See below.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27457
consultant, contractor, general partner,
active participant, teacher, speaker,
writer, or any other services provided by
an individual. This proposed definition
of ‘‘outside employment’’ is similar to
those adopted by other Federal agencies
and is designed to cover a broad range
of outside employment and activities in
which a Commission employee may
seek to engage. See, e.g., 5 CFR 3801.106
(Department of Justice) and 5 CFR
5701.101 (Federal Trade Commission).
Notably, this definition of ‘‘outside
employment’’ includes unpaid activity
which may not conform to the usual
understanding of ‘‘employment.’’
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(b) states
that a Commission employee other than
a special Government employee 5 must
obtain prior, written approval from the
DAEO before engaging in outside
employment or activities where the
services provided are related to the
employee’s official duties or involve the
application of the same specialized
skills or the same educational
background as used in the performance
of the employee’s official duties.
Accordingly, Commission employees
would be required to obtain prior,
written approval only when they sought
to engage in outside employment or
activities that are related, in one of those
respects, to their official duties. For
example, a Commission attorney
wishing to engage in weekend
employment as a salesperson for a retail
organization would not need to seek
prior approval because such
employment would not be related to his
or her official duties or involve the
application of the same specialized
skills or educational background as used
in his or her position at the
Commission. On the other hand, a
Commission attorney wishing to
represent a relative in a lawsuit filed
against a private party in State court
would be required to seek prior approval
because such representation would
involve the application of the same
specialized skill or same educational
background as used in his or her
position with the Commission.
Proposed section 5 CFR 4701.102(c)
would establish the procedure for the
submission of approval requests to the
DAEO. It would require that the request
be submitted through all of the
employee’s supervisors. For purposes of
this section, the Staff Director, the
5 ‘‘Special Government employee’’ is defined at 5
CFR 2635.102(l). Special Government employees
are temporary or part time employees hired to
provide expertise about the industry in which they
work. Such special Government employees are
expected to have outside employment, and it is
unnecessary to require them to seek prior approval
for such outside employment.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
27458
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
General Counsel, the Inspector General,
the Chief Financial Officer, a
Commissioner, or the Commission
would be considered the final level of
supervision for their respective
subordinates. A request would need to
provide certain information, including
the identity of the person, group, or
organization for which the employee
intends to provide services. Deadlines
for a supervisor to respond to a request
of a bargaining unit employee, and for
a bargaining unit employee to submit a
grievance in the event a request is
denied, are contained in the
Commission’s Labor-Management
Agreement. See Article 31, LaborManagement Agreement between the
Federal Election Commission and
Chapter 204 of the National Treasury
Employees Union, dated May 2, 2007.
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(d) would
set forth the standard for approval of an
employee’s request regarding outside
employment or activity, which is not in
current 11 CFR 7.9(f). Approval would
be granted only upon a determination
that the outside employment or activity
would not involve conduct prohibited
by statute or Federal regulations. In
making this determination, the
regulations to be considered would
include those at 5 CFR part 2635.
Therefore, the approval would depend
on (1) whether the outside employment
or activity would create conflicting
financial interests, or (2) a lack of
impartiality in performing official
duties, or (3) misuse of Government
position, and (4) whether the
employment or activity otherwise
complies with 5 CFR part 2635.
The Commission invites comments on
this proposal and on whether an
alternative system of seeking prior
approval is preferable to that proposed
and, if so, how an alternative system
should be structured.
B. Proposed Revisions to the
Commission’s Standards of Conduct in
11 CFR Part 7
The FECA provides authority for
some of the Commission’s regulations in
11 CFR part 7, including current 11 CFR
7.14 and 7.15, which concern
confidentiality of enforcement matters
and are based on 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(12).
The Commission proposes to retain
these rules. The Commission also
proposes to retain provisions that are
informational or procedural in nature,
such as current 11 CFR 7.1 (purpose and
applicability), 7.2 (definitions), 7.4
(interpretation and advisory service), 7.5
(reporting suspected violations), and 7.6
(disciplinary and corrective actions).
The revisions and clarifications
proposed for these provisions are
discussed below.
As explained above in Overview of
OGE Rules Implementing the Ethics
Reform Act, many of the Commission’s
regulations in current 11 CFR part 7
have been supplanted by OGE’s
regulations. Accordingly, the
Commission proposes to remove the
supplanted regulations from the
Commission’s Standards of Conduct in
current 11 CFR part 7.
The Commission’s current regulation
concerning political activity by
Commissioners and Commission
employees has been supplanted by the
Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993.
See Public Law 103–94, 107 Stat. 1001
(1993); current 11 CFR 7.11. Therefore,
the Commission proposes to remove
that regulation. See discussion below.
The regulations that the Commission
proposes to retain and revise would also
be redesignated. The following chart
lists the removals, revisions, and
redesignations proposed for current 11
CFR part 7.
Redesignated
11 CFR
section
Proposal
7.1(a) .....................................................
7.1(b) 6 & (c) ..........................................
7.1(b) 7 ...................................................
7.2 ..........................................................
7.3 ..........................................................
7.4 ..........................................................
7.5 ..........................................................
7.6 ..........................................................
7.7 ..........................................................
7.8 ..........................................................
7.9(a) .....................................................
7.9(b)–(f) ................................................
7.10 ........................................................
7.11 ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Revise.
Revise.
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
........................
........................
2635.101.
2635.102(h).
........................
7.3
7.4
7.5
........................
........................
7.6
........................
........................
........................
2638.701–2638.706.
7.12 ........................................................
7.13 ........................................................
7.14 ........................................................
7.15 ........................................................
7.16 ........................................................
7.17–7.21 ...............................................
7.22–7.33 ...............................................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Current 11 CFR
Section
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Revise and redesignate .......................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
Remove as supplanted ........................................................
........................
........................
7.7
13 7.8
........................
........................
........................
6 This entry refers to the portion of current 11
CFR 7.1(b) that separately includes special
Government employees. See also proposed 11 CFR
7.2(d).
7 This entry refers to the portion of current 11
CFR 7.1(b) that explains that current 11 CFR part
7 applies to Commission members and employees.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
8 See
also 5 CFR 2635.301–2635.304.
also proposed 5 CFR part 4701.
10 See also 5 CFR 2635.501–2635.503 and
2635.703.
11 See also discussion below.
12 See also 5 CFR 2635.502, 2635.704–2635.705,
and discussion below.
9 See
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Supplanted by 5 CFR
section
2635.101.
2635.201–2635.205.8
2635.801–2635.809.9
2635.401–2635.403.10
Hatch Act
Amendments.11
2635.402.12
2635.704.
2635.901–2635.902.
2635.102(h).14
18 U.S.C. 207.15
13 The citation to current 11 CFR 7.15 in 11 CFR
201.1 would be revised to cite proposed 11 CFR 7.8.
14 See also proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d) (including
special Government employees).
15 See also discussion below.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
1. Proposed 11 CFR 7.1—Scope
Proposed 11 CFR 7.1(a) would state
that the regulations in revised 11 CFR
part 7 apply to all members and
employees of the Commission. Proposed
11 CFR 7.1(b) would list the other
regulations in title 5 of the CFR and
proposed 5 CFR part 4701 that would
govern the ethical conduct of
Commissioners and employees. Current
11 CFR 7.1(b), which states that the
regulations in current 11 CFR part 7
apply to all employees and ‘‘special
Commission employees,’’ would be
removed. As explained below, proposed
11 CFR 7.2(d) would include ‘‘special
Government employees’’ in the
definition of ‘‘employee.’’ Although the
Commission’s current regulations use
the term ‘‘special Commission
employee,’’ the proposed regulation uses
the term ‘‘special Government
employee’’ as defined at 5 CFR
2635.102(l) in order to better conform to
OGE terminology. Because proposed 11
CFR 7.1(a) states that the regulations in
revised 11 CFR part 7 apply to all
Commission employees, which includes
special Government employees, current
paragraph (b) is no longer necessary.
Current 11 CFR 7.1(c), which states that
the regulations in current 11 CFR part
7 must be construed in accordance with
any applicable laws, regulations, and
the Commission’s Labor-Management
Agreement also would be removed
because it is unnecessary to state that
other laws, regulations, and agreements
apply.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Proposed 11 CFR 7.2—Definitions
Proposed 11 CFR 7.2 would continue
to set forth the definitions used in 11
CFR part 7. The definition of
‘‘Commission’’ in current 11 CFR 7.2(a)
would remain unchanged. The
definition of ‘‘Commissioner’’ in current
11 CFR 7.2(b) would be revised slightly.
Whereas current paragraph (b) of 11
CFR 7.2 defines ‘‘Commissioner,’’ in
part, as ‘‘a voting member of the Federal
Election Commission,’’ proposed 11 CFR
7.2(b) would delete the word ‘‘voting’’
from the definition. The word ‘‘voting’’
is no longer necessary because all
members of the Commission are
currently voting members. This
definition includes a Commissioner
who holds his or her position by virtue
of a recess appointment.
The definition of ‘‘conflict of interest’’
in current section 7.2(c) would be
removed. Instead, the Commission
would rely on OGE regulations and
regulatory definitions regarding
conflicts of interest, except for the
provisions in proposed 11 CFR 7.6
governing outside employment and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
activities of Commissioners. See, e.g., 5
CFR 2635.801–2635.809. Because
proposed section 7.6 would not use the
phrase ‘‘conflict of interest,’’ a definition
of that phrase specific to 11 CFR part 7
would no longer be needed.
The terms ‘‘Designated Agency Ethics
Officer’’ and ‘‘Ethics Officer’’ in current
11 CFR 7.2(d) would be replaced with
the term ‘‘Designated Agency Ethics
Official’’ in proposed section 7.2(c) and
throughout the proposed regulations.
See proposed 11 CFR 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5.
These changes would make the
Commission’s regulations consistent
with OGE’s regulations at 5 CFR
2638.104. Proposed 11 CFR 7.2(c) would
also include a provision from current 11
CFR 7.4 stating that the Commission’s
General Counsel serves as the
Designated Agency Ethics Official.
In proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d), the
definition of ‘‘employee’’ from current
11 CFR 7.2(e) would be amended to
include a ‘‘special Government
employee as defined in 18 U.S.C.
202(a).’’ OGE regulations at 5 CFR
2635.102(h) include ‘‘special
Government employee’’ within the
general definition of ‘‘employee,’’ thus
subjecting special Government
employees to the same Standards of
Conduct as other employees, with
certain limitations. Proposed section
7.2(d) would operate similarly.
Proposed section 7.2(e) defines ‘‘ex
parte communication’’ for the purposes
of 11 CFR part 7. This definition is
based on the definition of ‘‘ex parte
communication’’ at 11 CFR 201.2(a)
applicable to non-enforcement
situations.16 Similar to that definition,
proposed section 7.9(e) defines ‘‘ex parte
communication’’ as any written or oral
communication by any person outside
the agency to any Commissioner or any
member of any Commissioner’s staff,
but not to any other Commission
employee, that imparts information or
argument regarding prospective
Commission enforcement action or
potential action concerning any pending
enforcement matter. Similar to current
Commission regulations at 11 CFR
111.22 and part 201, the proposed
definition is limited to Commissioners
and their staff members because the
Commissioners are empowered to make
decisions on enforcement matters, and
their staff members are their
confidential assistants on these matters.
The Commission notes that ‘‘matter’’ as
used in the proposed rule includes
16 The treatment of ex parte communications in
enforcement matters is addressed in 11 CFR 111.22.
The treatment of ex parte communications in
audits, rulemakings, advisory opinions, public
funding cases, and litigation matters is covered by
11 CFR part 201.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27459
enforcement Matters Under Review,
Administrative Fines, and Alternative
Dispute Resolution cases (‘‘ADR’’). See
also discussion of proposed 11 CFR 7.9,
below.
Proposed section 7.2(f) defines the
term ‘‘Inspector General.’’ The
definitions of ‘‘former employee,’’
‘‘official responsibility,’’ ‘‘person,’’ and
‘‘special Commission employee’’ at
current 11 CFR 7.2(f), (g), (i), and (j),
respectively, would be removed from
proposed section 7.2 as these definitions
are no longer necessary. In addition,
paragraph (h) of current 11 CFR 7.2
defining ‘‘outside employment or other
outside activity’’ would be removed.
Because the Commission proposes, with
OGE concurrence, to replace much of
current 11 CFR 7.9 (outside employment
or activities by Commission employees)
with a supplemental regulation at 5 CFR
4701.102, paragraph (h) of current 11
CFR 7.2 defining ‘‘outside employment
or other outside activity’’ would be
superfluous.
3. Proposed 11 CFR 7.3—Interpretation
and Advisory Service
Proposed 11 CFR 7.3 is a revised
version of current 11 CFR 7.4, which
addresses interpretation and advisory
service. Proposed 11 CFR 7.3(a) adds
references to 5 CFR parts 735, 2634,
2635, 2640, and 4701 as subjects on
which a Commissioner or employee
may seek interpretation and advice.
Also, proposed paragraph (a) identifies
the DAEO as the person from whom
advice should be sought. Proposed
paragraph (b) clarifies that the DAEO, a
Commissioner, or an employee may
request an opinion from the Director of
OGE concerning interpretations of 5
CFR parts 2634, 2635, or 2640.
4. Proposed 11 CFR 7.4—Reporting
Suspected Violations
Proposed 11 CFR 7.4 is a revised
version of current 11 CFR 7.5 and
addresses the reporting of suspected
violations of the FEC’s Standards of
Conduct and OGE’s Standards of Ethical
Conduct. Proposed section 7.4 requires
the reporting of suspected violations of
5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, and
4701 or revised 11 CFR part 7 to the
DAEO, the Inspector General, or other
appropriate law enforcement
authorities.
5. Proposed 11 CFR 7.5—Corrective
Action
Proposed 11 CFR 7.5 informs
employees that a violation of the FEC’s
Standards of Conduct or OGE’s
Standards of Ethical Conduct may be
cause for appropriate corrective action,
disciplinary action, or adverse action, in
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
27460
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
addition to any penalty prescribed by
law, including criminal penalties.
Proposed section 7.5 is based on current
paragraph 7.6(a). Procedures for taking
corrective, disciplinary, and adverse
actions are set forth in other authority.
Accordingly, the procedures in current
paragraphs 7.6(b) and (c) are
unnecessary and would be deleted.
6. Proposed 11 CFR 7.6—Outside
Employment and Activities by
Commissioners
Proposed 11 CFR 7.6 addresses
outside employment or activities of
Commissioners.17 FECA provides
authority for additional restrictions on
Commissioners’ outside employment
and activities. See 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3).
Similar to the current rule at 11 CFR
7.9(a), proposed 11 CFR 7.6 states that
no Commissioner may devote a
substantial portion of his or her time to
any other business, vocation, or
employment. This regulation would also
retain the current rule’s allowance of a
90-day period for a Commissioner,
following the start of Commission
service, to limit such activity.
As noted in the 1986 Explanation and
Justification for the current rule on
Commissioners’ outside activities, the
use of the words ‘‘substantial portion’’ of
a Commissioner’s time to trigger the
regulation’s prohibitions is based on the
legislative history of 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3).
See Explanation and Justification for
Final Rules on Standards of Conduct for
Agency Employees, 51 FR 34440, 34442
(Sept. 29, 1986). The Conference Report
that accompanied the 1976 amendments
to FECA discusses 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3):
‘‘The conferees agree that the
requirement is intended to apply to
members who devote a substantial
portion of their time to such business,
vocation, or employment activities.’’
H.R. Rep. No. 94–1057, at 34 (1976)
(Conf. Rep.), reprinted in Legislative
History of Federal Election Campaign
Act Amendments of 1976, at 1028
(1977). The proposed rule continues this
interpretation.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
7. Proposed 11 CFR 7.7—Prohibition
Against Making Complaints and
Investigations Public
FECA prohibits any person from
making public ‘‘any notification or
investigation’’ of a complaint under 2
U.S.C. 437g without the written consent
17 Outside activities of all FEC employees are
addressed in OGE’s Standards of Ethical Conduct at
5 CFR 2635.801–2635.809, which, when the
standards became effective in February 1993,
superseded the Commission’s current regulations at
11 CFR 7.9(b)–(f). Commissioners have additional
limitations on outside activities as described in
proposed 11 CFR 7.6 and 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
of the person receiving the notification
or with respect to whom the
investigation is made. 2 U.S.C.
437g(a)(12)(A); 11 CFR 111.21. Proposed
11 CFR 7.7 derives its authority from
that provision of FECA. The proposed
rule follows current 11 CFR 7.14.
8. Proposed 11 CFR 7.8—Ex Parte
Communications in Enforcement
Actions
Proposed 11 CFR 7.8 is a revised
version of current 11 CFR 7.15 and
addresses ex parte communications.
The title of proposed 11 CFR 7.8
clarifies that the rule applies
specifically to ex parte communications
in enforcement matters. Proposed 11
CFR 7.8(a) and (d) would revise the rule
to clarify that the prohibition on ex
parte communications would apply
only to Commissioners and any member
of a Commissioner’s staff. These
proposed changes would conform
proposed 11 CFR 7.8 to the current ex
parte rules in 11 CFR 111.22 and part
201. See also discussion of proposed 11
CFR 7.2(e), above. Proposed section 7.8
also contains nonsubstantive revisions
from paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) of
current section 7.15. Finally, proposed
11 CFR 7.8 would add references to 11
CFR 111.22, governing ex parte
communications made in connection
with Commission enforcement actions,
and 11 CFR part 201, governing ex parte
communications made in connection
with public funding, audits, litigation,
rulemakings, and advisory opinions. See
proposed 11 CFR 7.8(e). The
Commission seeks comment on these
changes to its ex parte communication
rules.
9. Proposed Removal of Current 11 CFR
7.11—Political and Organization
Activity
The Hatch Act Reform Amendments
of 1993 18 lifted many of the restrictions
imposed by the original Hatch Act on
most Federal employees with regard to
participation in political campaigns.
However, Congress specifically
addressed the FEC in the Hatch Act
Amendments and left all of the original
Hatch Act’s restrictions in place for
employees of the Commission, other
than Commissioners. See 5 U.S.C.
7323(b)(1) and (2). In contrast to the
Commissioners, Commission employees
may not give a political contribution to
a Member of Congress, an employee of
the Executive Branch (other than the
President or Vice President), or an
officer of a uniformed service. 5 U.S.C.
7323(b)(1). Additionally, Commission
18 Public Law 103–94, 107 Stat. 1001 (1993)
(‘‘Hatch Act Amendments’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
employees may not ‘‘take an active part
in political management or political
campaigns.’’ 5 U.S.C. 7323(b)(2)(A).
The Hatch Act, as amended, prohibits
certain political activities by
Commissioners such as (1) using official
authority or influence to interfere with
an election, (2) knowingly soliciting or
discouraging political activity by
anyone subject to a Commission audit or
investigation, (3) soliciting or receiving
political contributions (except in
certain, narrowly limited
circumstances), or (4) being a candidate
for public office in a partisan election.
5 U.S.C. 7323(a).
OPM has authority to issue
regulations regarding the Hatch Act
Amendments, and the Office of Special
Counsel (‘‘OSC’’) interprets and enforces
those regulations. See 5 U.S.C.
1103(a)(5) and 7325. No provisions in
the Hatch Act Amendments empower
any agencies other than OPM to issue
regulations pursuant to the Hatch Act
Amendments, and no provision in
FECA directly refers to the Hatch Act
Amendments or previous Hatch Act
restrictions. OPM has issued a
regulation expressly prescribing the
extent to which the political activities of
employees may be limited beyond the
restrictions in the Hatch Act
Amendments. This OPM regulation
provides that: ‘‘No further proscriptions
or restrictions may be imposed upon
employees covered under this
regulation except: (a) Employees who
are appointed by the President by and
with the advice and consent of the
Senate; (b) Employees who are
appointed by the President; (c) Noncareer senior executive service
members; (d) Schedule C employees, 5
CFR 213.3301, 213.3302; and (e) Any
other employees who serve at the
pleasure of the President.’’ See 5 CFR
734.104.
The Commission has received an
advisory opinion from OSC as to the
scope of the Commission’s authority to
interpret the Hatch Act Amendments
regarding Commissioners and
Commission employees.19 The specific
question asked was whether the
Commission may adopt a regulation that
would forbid a Commissioner or a
Commission employee from publicly
supporting, or working for, or
contributing to, a candidate, political
party, or political committee subject to
the jurisdiction of the Commission, even
if in the case of public support, the
activity is not done in concert with the
19 A copy of the Office of Special Counsel’s
opinion is available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.fec.gov/law/law_rulemakings.shtml
under ‘‘Standards of Conduct.’’
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
candidate, political party, or political
committee. In its opinion, the OSC
noted the OPM regulations cited above
and stated with respect to employees
that ‘‘the FEC cannot further restrict the
political activity of its regular
employees by forbidding them from
publicly supporting or contributing to a
candidate, political party, or political
committee subject to the jurisdiction of
the Commission.’’ U.S. Office of Special
Counsel Advisory Opinion, OSC File
No. AD–03–0095, at 2 (Aug. 29, 2003).
The OSC opinion also noted with
respect to Commissioners that ‘‘the FEC
has no authority to adopt regulations
that would forbid a Commissioner from
publicly supporting, working for, or
contributing to a candidate, political
party, or political committee subject to
the jurisdiction of the FEC.’’ Id. at 2–3.
Its final conclusion was that ‘‘the FEC
may not adopt regulations that would
limit the political activity of FEC
employees or Commissioners beyond
the restrictions set forth in the Hatch
Act.’’ 20 Id. at 3.
Accordingly, the Commission
proposes to delete current section 7.11
because it is inconsistent with the Hatch
Act Amendments.
10. Proposed Removal of Current 11
CFR 7.12—Membership in Associations
The Commission proposes to remove
current 11 CFR 7.12, which addresses
employee and Commissioner
membership in associations. In 1991,
OGE issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking that included proposed
regulations concerning participation in
professional associations. See Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking on Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch, 56 FR 33778 (July 23,
1991). OGE decided, however, to reserve
action in its final rule on this topic as
a result of the overwhelming response to
its request for comments. See
Explanation and Justification for Final
Rule on Standards of Ethical Conduct
for Employees of the Executive Branch,
57 FR 35006 (Aug. 7, 1992). The
Commission agrees with the position
taken by OGE in its rulemaking that
ethical concerns regarding membership
in nongovernmental associations or
organizations may be addressed under
the more general standards in 5 CFR
part 2635. See 57 FR at 35035. Among
those general provisions that are
applicable are 5 CFR 2635.402
(concerning disqualifying financial
20 Under 5 U.S.C. 1212, the advisory opinion
authority of the OSC is limited to matters related
to the Hatch Act. Therefore, the conclusions of the
opinion are also limited to interpretations of the
Hatch Act and OPM regulations. They do not apply
to any separate statutory authority under FECA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
27461
interests), 5 CFR 2635.502 (concerning
personal and business relationships),
and 5 CFR 2635.704 and 2635.705
(concerning use of government property
and official time).
List of Subjects
11. Proposed Removal of Current 11
CFR Part 7, Subpart D (Post
Employment Conflict of Interest:
Procedure for Administrative
Enforcement Proceedings)
11 CFR Part 7
Administrative practice and
procedure, Conflict of interests,
Government employees, Political
activities (government employees).
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Election
Commission, with the concurrence of
the Office of Government Ethics,
proposes to amend title 5 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, and the Federal
Election Commission further proposes
to amend chapter I of title 11 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
Current 11 CFR part 7, subpart D,
concerns administrative procedures to
be followed for investigations of postemployment conflict-of-interest
violations by individuals who have left
Commission employment. Subpart D
was based on a prior version of 18
U.S.C. 207 and 5 CFR parts 2637 and
2641. When subpart D was adopted, 18
U.S.C. 207(j) authorized agency
proceedings against individuals who
violated that section and required that
‘‘departments and agencies shall, in
consultation with the Director of the
Office of Government Ethics, establish
procedures to carry out this subsection.’’
Subsequently, however, 18 U.S.C.
207(j) was amended and the section
authorizing administrative procedures
and the authority to draft regulations
regarding the procedures was removed
and replaced.21 The Commission has no
pending post-employment situations
concerning employees who left service
prior to the repeal of this provision.
Accordingly, the Commission is
proposing to remove 11 CFR part 7,
subpart D pertaining to proceedings
regarding post-employment conflicts of
interest in its entirety. Please note that
former employees would remain subject
to Department of Justice criminal
prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 207 for
post-employment conflict of interest
violations. See 18 U.S.C. 216.
Certification of No Effect Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b)
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission certifies that the
attached proposed rules, if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The basis of this certification is
that this rulemaking affects only the
appointed members of the Federal
Election Commission and its employees.
The members of the Commission and its
employees are individuals, and are not
small entities under 5 U.S.C. 601.
21 See Public Law 101–189, Div. A, Title VIII, Part
B, sec. 814(d)(2), 103 Stat. 1352, 1499 (1989).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5 CFR Part 4701
Conflict of interests, Government
employees, Outside activities.
TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT
ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES
1. Add Chapter XXXVII, consisting of
part 4701, to read as follows:
Chapter XXXVII—Federal Election
Commission
PART 4701—SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL
ELECTION COMMISSION
Sec.
4701.101 Scope.
4701.102 Prior approval for certain outside
employment.
Authority: 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3); 5 U.S.C.
7301; 5 U.S.C. app. (Ethics in Government
Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR
p. 215 (1989 Comp.), as modified by E.O.
12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR p. 306 (1990
Comp.); 5 CFR 2635.105 and 2635.803.
§ 4701.101
Scope.
(a) In accordance with 5 CFR
2635.105, the regulations in this part set
forth standards of conduct that apply to
members and other employees of the
Federal Election Commission
(‘‘Commission’’).
(b) In addition, members and other
employees of the Commission are
subject to the following regulations:
(1) 5 CFR part 735 (Employee
Responsibilities and Conduct);
(2) 5 CFR part 2634 (Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, Qualified Trusts,
and Certificates of Divestiture);
(3) 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch); and
(4) 11 CFR part 7 (Standards of
Conduct for Members and Employees of
the Federal Election Commission).
§ 4701.102 Prior approval for certain
outside employment.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
27462
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(1) Active participant has the meaning
set forth in 5 CFR 2635.502(b)(1)(v).
(2) Employee has the meaning set
forth in 5 CFR 2635.102(h).
(3) Definition of outside employment.
For purposes of this section, outside
employment means any form of nonFederal employment, business
relationship or activity involving the
provision of personal services, whether
or not for compensation. It includes, but
is not limited to, services as an officer,
director, agent, advisor, attorney,
consultant, contractor, general partner,
trustee, teacher, speaker, writer, or any
other services provided by an
individual. It includes writing when
done under an arrangement with
another person for production or
publication of the written product. The
definition does not include
participation in the activities of a
nonprofit charitable, religious,
professional, social, fraternal,
educational, recreational, public service
or civic organization, unless:
(i) The activity provides
compensation other than reimbursement
of expenses;
(ii) The activities of the non-Federal
organization are devoted substantially to
matters relating to the employee’s
official duties as defined in 5 CFR
2635.807(a)(2)(i)(B)–(E) and the
employee will serve as officer or
director of the non-Federal organization;
or
(iii) The activities will involve the
provision of consultative or professional
services. Consultative services means
the provision of personal services,
including the rendering of advice or
consultation, which requires advanced
knowledge in a field of science or
learning customarily acquired by a
course of specialized instruction and
study in an institution of higher
education, hospital, or similar facility.
Professional services means the
provision of personal services,
including the rendering of advice or
consultation, which involves
application of the skills of a profession
as defined in 5 CFR 2636.305(b)(1) or
involves a fiduciary relationship as
defined in 5 CFR 2636.305(b)(2).
(4) Related to the employee’s official
duties means that the outside
employment meets one or more of the
tests described in 5 CFR
2635.807(a)(2)(i)(B)–(E). Outside
employment related to the employee’s
official duties includes:
(i) Outside employment that an
employee has been invited to participate
in because of his or her official position
rather than his or her expertise in the
subject matter;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
(ii) Outside employment in which an
employee has been asked to participate
by a person that has interests that may
be substantially affected by the
performance or nonperformance of the
employee’s official duties;
(iii) Outside employment that conveys
information derived from nonpublic
information gained during the course of
government employment; and
(iv) Outside employment that deals in
significant part with any matter to
which the employee is or has been
officially assigned in the last year, or
any ongoing or announced Commission
policy, program, or operation.
(b) Prior approval requirement. An
employee of the Commission, including
a member of a Commissioner’s staff, but
not a member of the Commission or a
special Government employee, shall
obtain written approval from the
Designated Agency Ethics Official
before engaging in outside employment
where the services provided:
(1) Are related to the employee’s
official duties; or
(2) Involve the application of the same
specialized skills or the same
educational background as used in the
performance of the employee’s official
duties.
(c) Submission of requests for
approval. (1) The request for approval
shall be sent through all of the
employee’s supervisors and shall state
the name of the person, group, or
organization for whom the outside
employment is to be performed; the type
of outside employment to be performed;
and the proposed hours of, and
approximate dates of, the outside
employment.
(2) Upon a significant change in the
nature or scope of the outside
employment or in the employee’s
official position, the employee shall
submit a revised request for approval.
(d) Standard for approval. Approval
shall be granted only upon a
determination that the outside
employment is not expected to involve
conduct prohibited by statute or Federal
regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
TITLE 11—FEDERAL ELECTIONS
Chapter I—Federal Election Commission
2. Revise part 7 to read as follows:
PART 7—STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Sec.
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
PO 00000
Scope.
Definitions.
Interpretation and advisory service.
Reporting suspected violations.
Corrective action.
Outside employment and activities by
Commissioners.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7.7
Prohibition against making complaints
and investigations public.
7.8 Ex parte communications in
enforcement actions.
Authority: 2 U.S.C. 437c, 437d, and 438; 5
U.S.C. 7321 et seq. and app. 3.
§ 7.1
Scope.
(a) The regulations in this part apply
to members and employees of the
Federal Election Commission
(‘‘Commission’’).
(b) In addition, members and
employees of the Commission are
subject to the following regulations:
(1) 5 CFR part 735 (Employee
Responsibilities and Conduct);
(2) 5 CFR part 2634 (Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, Qualified Trusts,
and Certificates of Divestiture);
(3) 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch); and
(4) 5 CFR part 4701 (Supplemental
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Federal Election
Commission).
§ 7.2
Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) Commission means the Federal
Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463.
(b) Commissioner means a member of
the Federal Election Commission, in
accordance with 2 U.S.C. 437c.
(c) Designated Agency Ethics Official
means the employee designated by the
Commission to administer the
provisions of the Ethics in Government
Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. appendix), as
amended, and includes a designee of the
Designated Agency Ethics Official. The
General Counsel serves as the
Commission’s Designated Agency Ethics
Official.
(d) Employee means an employee of
the Federal Election Commission and
includes a special Government
employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a).
(e) Ex parte communication means
any written or oral communication by
any person outside the agency to any
Commissioner or any member of any
Commissioner’s staff, but not to any
other Commission employee, that
imparts information or argument
regarding prospective Commission
action or potential action concerning
any pending enforcement matter.
(f) Inspector General means the
individual appointed by the
Commission to administer the
provisions of the Inspector General Act
of 1978, as amended (5 U.S.C.
appendix), and includes any designee of
the Inspector General.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 7.3
Interpretation and advisory service.
(a) A Commissioner or employee
seeking advice and guidance on matters
covered by this part or 5 CFR parts 735,
2634, 2635, 2640, or 4701 may consult
with the Designated Agency Ethics
Official. The Designated Agency Ethics
Official should be consulted before
undertaking any action that might
violate this part or 5 CFR parts 735,
2634, 2635, 2640, or 4701 governing the
conduct of Commissioners or
employees.
(b) The Designated Agency Ethics
Official, a Commissioner, or an
employee may request an opinion from
the Director of the Office of Government
Ethics regarding an interpretation of 5
CFR parts 2634, 2635, or 2640.
§ 7.4
Reporting suspected violations.
Commissioners and employees shall
disclose immediately any suspected
violation of a statute or of a rule set
forth in this part or of a rule set forth
in 5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, or
4701 to the Designated Agency Ethics
Official, the Office of Inspector General,
or other appropriate law enforcement
authorities.
§ 7.5
Corrective action.
A violation of this part or 5 CFR parts
735, 2634, 2635, 2640, or 4701 by an
employee may be cause for appropriate
corrective, disciplinary, or adverse
action in addition to any penalty
prescribed by law.
§ 7.6 Outside employment and activities
by Commissioners.
No member of the Commission may
devote a substantial portion of his or her
time to any other business, vocation, or
employment. Any individual who is
engaging substantially in any other
business, vocation, or employment at
the time such individual begins to serve
as a member of the Commission will
appropriately limit such activity no later
than 90 days after beginning to serve as
such a member.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 7.7 Prohibition against making
complaints and investigations public.
(a) Commission employees are
warned that they are subject to criminal
penalties if they discuss or otherwise
make public any matters pertaining to a
complaint or investigation under 2
U.S.C. 437g, without the written
permission of the person complained
against or being investigated. Such
communications are prohibited by 2
U.S.C. 437g(a)(12)(A).
(b) Section 437g(a)(12)(B) of title 2 of
the United States Code provides as
follows: ‘‘Any member or employee of
the Commission, or any other person,
who violates the provisions of [2 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
437g(a)(12)(A)] shall be fined not more
than $2,000. Any such member,
employee, or other person who
knowingly and willfully violates the
provisions of [2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(12)(A)]
shall be fined not more than $5,000.’’
§ 7.8 Ex parte communications in
enforcement actions.
In order to avoid the possibility of
prejudice, real or apparent, to the public
interest in enforcement actions pending
before the Commission pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g:
(a) Except to the extent required for
the disposition of enforcement matters
as required by law (as, for example,
during the normal course of an
investigation or a conciliation effort), no
Commissioner or member of any
Commissioner’s staff shall make or
entertain any ex parte communications.
(b) The prohibition of this section
shall apply from the time a proper
complaint is filed with the Commission
pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(1) or from
the time that the Commission
determines on the basis of information
ascertained in the normal course of its
supervisory responsibilities that it has
reason to believe that a violation has
occurred or may occur pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g(a)(2), and shall remain in
force until the Commission has
concluded all action with respect to the
enforcement matter in question.
(c) Any written communication
prohibited by paragraph (a) of this
section shall be delivered to the General
Counsel, who shall place the
communication in the case file.
(d) A Commissioner or member of any
Commissioner’s staff involved in
handling enforcement actions who
receives an offer to make an oral
communication or any communication
concerning any enforcement action
pending before the Commission as
described in paragraph (a) of this
section, shall decline to listen to such
communication. If unsuccessful in
preventing the communication, the
Commissioner or employee shall advise
the person making the communication
that he or she will not consider the
communication and shall prepare a
statement setting forth the substance
and circumstances of the
communication. Within 48 hours of
receipt of the communication, the
Commissioner or any member of any
Commissioner’s staff shall prepare a
statement setting forth the substance
and circumstances of the
communication and shall deliver the
statement to the General Counsel for
placing in the file in the manner set
forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27463
(e) Additional rules governing ex
parte communications made in
connection with Commission
enforcement actions are found at 11 CFR
111.22. Rules governing ex parte
communications made in connection
with public funding, Commission
audits, litigation, rulemakings, and
advisory opinions are found at 11 CFR
part 201.
Dated: May 11, 2010.
On behalf of the Commission.
Matthew S. Petersen,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
Approved: May 7, 2010.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2010–11599 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
RIN 3150–AI75
[NRC–2009–0538]
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: NUHOMS® HD System Revision
1; Correction
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
notice appearing in the Federal Register
on May 7, 2010 (75 FR 25120), that
proposes to amend the regulations that
govern storage of spent nuclear fuel.
Specifically, this proposed amendment
would be to the list of approved spent
fuel storage casks to add revision 1 to
the NUHOMS HD spent fuel storage
cask system. This action is necessary to
correctly specify the date by which
comments must be received, because the
notice of direct final rulemaking (75 FR
24786; May 6, 2010), and the
companion notice of proposed
rulemaking were published in the
Federal Register on different dates
instead of being published concurrently
on the same date, as erroneously stated
in the notices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6219, e-mail
Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
On page
25120, in the third column, the fifth full
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27456-27463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11599]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 27456]]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
5 CFR Chapter XXXVII
11 CFR Part 7
[NOTICE 2010-05]
RIN 3209-AA15
Standards of Conduct
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission (``Commission'' or ``FEC''),
with the concurrence of the office of Government Ethics (``OGE''),
seeks comments on proposed revisions to the ``Standards of Conduct,''
which are the FEC rules that govern the conduct of Commissioners and
Commission employees. The proposed rules would update the Commission's
current regulations to reflect statutory changes enacted after the
Standards of Conduct were originally promulgated in 1986, and to
conform to regulations issued by OGE and the Office of Personnel
Management (``OPM''). OGE's regulations establish a government-wide
standard of ethical conduct for the Executive Branch and independent
agencies, and are known as OGE's Standards of Ethical Conduct. In
addition to the proposed revisions to the FEC's Standards of Conduct,
the Commission, with OGE's concurrence, is also proposing new rules
that would supplement, for Commissioners and employees of the FEC, the
OGE Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch.
The proposed rules that follow do not represent a final decision by the
Commission or OGE on the issues presented by this rulemaking. The
supplementary information that follows provides further information.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be in writing, must be addressed to Robert
M. Knop, Assistant General Counsel, and must be submitted in e-mail,
facsimile, or paper copy form. Commenters are strongly encouraged to
submit comments by e-mail or fax to ensure timely receipt and
consideration. E-mail comments must be sent to ethicsrules@fec.gov. If
e-mail comments include an attachment, the attachment must be in either
Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) or Microsoft Word (.doc) format. Faxed comments
must be sent to (202) 219-3923, with paper copy follow-up. Paper
comments and paper copy follow-up of faxed comments must be sent to the
Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463.
All comments must include the full name and postal service address of
the commenter or they will not be considered. The Commission will post
comments on its Web site after the comment period ends.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert M. Knop, Assistant General
Counsel, or Attorneys Mr. Anthony T. Buckley or Mr. Ethan A. Carrier,
999 E Street, NW., Washington DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-
9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview of OGE Rules Implementing the Ethics Reform Act and
Proposed FEC Supplemental Rules
A. Legal Authority
The Ethics Reform Act of 1989 \1\ includes restrictions on gifts,
travel, outside activities, and outside employment. See Public Law 101-
194, tit. III and VI, 103 Stat. 1716 (1989). It authorizes the Office
of Government Ethics (``OGE'') to implement regulations concerning the
conduct of executive branch employees. See 5 U.S.C. 7351(c). In 1992,
OGE issued a final rule setting forth uniform standards of ethical
conduct and an interim final rule on financial disclosure, and in 1996
issued a final rule on financial interests, all for executive branch
departments and agencies of the Federal Government and their employees.
These three executive branch-wide regulations, as corrected and
amended, are codified at 5 CFR parts 2634, 2635, and 2640.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 101-194, 103 Stat. 1716 (1989).
\2\ Shortly before Congress passed the Ethics Reform Act, the
President issued Executive Order 12674, which sets forth basic
principles of ethical conduct for Federal employees and requires OGE
to promulgate ``regulations that establish a single, comprehensive,
and clear set of executive-branch standards of conduct.'' E.O.
12674, 54 FR 15159, 15160 (Apr. 12, 1989). This Executive Order was
later modified. E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547 (Oct. 17, 1990). OGE's
regulations also implement Executive Order 12674, as modified by
Executive Order 12731.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OGE regulations implementing the Ethics Reform Act supersede
any agency standards of conduct regulations previously issued and
therefore supersede, with some exceptions, the Commission's current
regulations in 11 CFR part 7. Although agencies may still issue
regulations to supplement OGE's Standards of Ethical Conduct in order
to accommodate specific agency needs, these regulations must be issued
in accordance with OGE's rules, and must be submitted to OGE for prior
approval. See 5 CFR 2635.105(a) and (b). Agencies may, however, retain
any regulations based on their own separate statutory authority or that
address different, non-ethics matters.
B. Topics Addressed in OGE and OPM Regulations
OGE regulations address gifts from outside sources, gifts between
employees, conflicting financial interests, impartiality in performing
official duties, pursuit of other employment, misuse of position, and
outside employment and activities. See 5 CFR part 2635.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The remainder of this section is only a brief summary.
Important additional restrictions and exceptions may apply. Readers
should consult the cited regulations for further information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to OGE's Standards of Conduct, Commission employees are
subject to certain rules issued by OPM concerning employee
responsibilities and conduct. See 5 CFR part 735. These OPM rules
address restrictions on certain gambling activities, conduct
prejudicial to the government, and unauthorized examination training
for individuals preparing to take civil and Foreign Service
examinations. See 5 CFR part 735.
FEC and OGE have determined that the following proposed
supplemental regulations are necessary and appropriate in view of FEC's
programs and operations and to fulfill the purposes of the OGE
standards. The supplemental regulations proposed will be issued in new
chapter XXXVII of title 5 of the CFR. In addition, the FEC is revising
its current regulations at 11 CFR part 7 to conform to the OGE and OPM
regulations, without compromising the Commission's essential
independence in its core
[[Page 27457]]
mission of administering Federal campaign finance laws.
II. Analysis of the Proposed Regulations
The following discussion explains the Commission's proposal to
amend the rules that govern the conduct of Commissioners and Commission
employees by adding supplemental regulations in a new chapter XXXVII of
5 CFR, consisting of part 4701, and by revising the Commission's
Standards of Conduct in 11 CFR part 7. The Commission seeks comment on
the proposed rules.
A. Proposed Supplemental Regulations in 5 CFR part 4701
1. Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101--Scope
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101 states the authority for the supplemental
regulations, which includes 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3), 5 U.S.C. 7301, and 5
U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government Act of 1978). Proposed 5 CFR
4701.101(a) indicates that the regulations of 5 CFR part 4701 apply to
both members of the Commission (``Commissioners'') and employees of the
Commission. Proposed 5 CFR 4701.101(b) lists some of the other
regulations in title 5 and 11 CFR part 7 that would govern the ethical
conduct of Commissioners and employees.
2. Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102--Prior Approval for Certain Outside
Employment and Activities
The OGE Standards of Ethical Conduct supersede the Commission's
current regulation at 11 CFR 7.9(f) concerning prior approval for
outside employment and activities. However, an agency may issue
supplemental regulations with OGE's concurrence that require the
agency's employees to obtain approval before engaging in outside
employment or activities. See 5 CFR 2635.105 and 2635.803.
The Commission has found the current approval requirement for
outside employment or activities useful in ensuring that the outside
employment and activities of its employees conform to all applicable
laws and regulations. Because that requirement is deemed necessary to
the administration of its ethics program, the Commission, with the
concurrence of OGE, proposes to renew its requirement for prior
approval of certain outside employment and activities, and to issue a
supplemental regulation in accordance with 5 CFR 2635.803 at proposed 5
CFR 4701.102.
Proposed section 4701.102 would differ significantly from current
11 CFR 7.9(f). The major difference is in the scope of the outside
employment and activities covered by the proposed regulation. Current
11 CFR 7.9(f) requires Commission employees to obtain prior approval
for all outside employment and activities. The term ``outside
employment or other outside activity'' is defined broadly at current 11
CFR 7.2(h) to include ``any work, service or other activity performed
by an employee.'' In contrast, proposed 5 CFR 4701.102 requires prior
approval from the Designated Agency Ethics Official (``DAEO'') only for
outside activities that are related to the employee's official duties
or involve the application of the same specialized skills or the same
educational background as used in the performance of the employee's
official duties. This rule, which draws on portions of prior approval
regulations adopted by several other Federal agencies with OGE
concurrence, is narrowly constructed to address agency concerns, while
limiting the administrative burdens placed on employees. See, e.g., 5
CFR 3801.106 (Department of Justice); 5 CFR 4501.103 (OPM); 5 CFR
6301.102 (Department of Education); and 5 CFR 8601.102 (Federal
Retirement Thrift Investment Board).
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a) would set out the definitions of the
terms used in proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(b). The definitions for ``active
participant,'' ``employee,'' and ``related to the employee's official
duties'' refer back to the definitions of these terms used in the
general standards of conduct regulations issued by OGE.
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a)(2) would define ``employee'' as defined
in OGE's regulation at 5 CFR 2635.102(h), which includes ``any officer
or employee of an agency.'' This definition includes Commissioners.
However, proposed section 4701.102(b) would exclude Commissioners from
its procedures.\4\ Instead, proposed 11 CFR 7.6, discussed below, would
address outside employment and activities by Commissioners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Act already restricts outside activities of
Commissioners. See 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3). Regulations implementing
this provision are already in place, see 11 CFR 7.9, and are being
reassigned in this rulemaking. See below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(a)(3) would define ``outside employment''
to mean any form of non-Federal employment, business relationship or
activity involving the provision of personal services, with or without
compensation, other than in the discharge of official duties. The
proposed definition provides a non-exhaustive list of services such as
serving as a lawyer, officer, director, trustee, agent, consultant,
contractor, general partner, active participant, teacher, speaker,
writer, or any other services provided by an individual. This proposed
definition of ``outside employment'' is similar to those adopted by
other Federal agencies and is designed to cover a broad range of
outside employment and activities in which a Commission employee may
seek to engage. See, e.g., 5 CFR 3801.106 (Department of Justice) and 5
CFR 5701.101 (Federal Trade Commission). Notably, this definition of
``outside employment'' includes unpaid activity which may not conform
to the usual understanding of ``employment.''
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(b) states that a Commission employee other
than a special Government employee \5\ must obtain prior, written
approval from the DAEO before engaging in outside employment or
activities where the services provided are related to the employee's
official duties or involve the application of the same specialized
skills or the same educational background as used in the performance of
the employee's official duties. Accordingly, Commission employees would
be required to obtain prior, written approval only when they sought to
engage in outside employment or activities that are related, in one of
those respects, to their official duties. For example, a Commission
attorney wishing to engage in weekend employment as a salesperson for a
retail organization would not need to seek prior approval because such
employment would not be related to his or her official duties or
involve the application of the same specialized skills or educational
background as used in his or her position at the Commission. On the
other hand, a Commission attorney wishing to represent a relative in a
lawsuit filed against a private party in State court would be required
to seek prior approval because such representation would involve the
application of the same specialized skill or same educational
background as used in his or her position with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``Special Government employee'' is defined at 5 CFR
2635.102(l). Special Government employees are temporary or part time
employees hired to provide expertise about the industry in which
they work. Such special Government employees are expected to have
outside employment, and it is unnecessary to require them to seek
prior approval for such outside employment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed section 5 CFR 4701.102(c) would establish the procedure
for the submission of approval requests to the DAEO. It would require
that the request be submitted through all of the employee's
supervisors. For purposes of this section, the Staff Director, the
[[Page 27458]]
General Counsel, the Inspector General, the Chief Financial Officer, a
Commissioner, or the Commission would be considered the final level of
supervision for their respective subordinates. A request would need to
provide certain information, including the identity of the person,
group, or organization for which the employee intends to provide
services. Deadlines for a supervisor to respond to a request of a
bargaining unit employee, and for a bargaining unit employee to submit
a grievance in the event a request is denied, are contained in the
Commission's Labor-Management Agreement. See Article 31, Labor-
Management Agreement between the Federal Election Commission and
Chapter 204 of the National Treasury Employees Union, dated May 2,
2007.
Proposed 5 CFR 4701.102(d) would set forth the standard for
approval of an employee's request regarding outside employment or
activity, which is not in current 11 CFR 7.9(f). Approval would be
granted only upon a determination that the outside employment or
activity would not involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal
regulations. In making this determination, the regulations to be
considered would include those at 5 CFR part 2635. Therefore, the
approval would depend on (1) whether the outside employment or activity
would create conflicting financial interests, or (2) a lack of
impartiality in performing official duties, or (3) misuse of Government
position, and (4) whether the employment or activity otherwise complies
with 5 CFR part 2635.
The Commission invites comments on this proposal and on whether an
alternative system of seeking prior approval is preferable to that
proposed and, if so, how an alternative system should be structured.
B. Proposed Revisions to the Commission's Standards of Conduct in 11
CFR Part 7
The FECA provides authority for some of the Commission's
regulations in 11 CFR part 7, including current 11 CFR 7.14 and 7.15,
which concern confidentiality of enforcement matters and are based on 2
U.S.C. 437g(a)(12). The Commission proposes to retain these rules. The
Commission also proposes to retain provisions that are informational or
procedural in nature, such as current 11 CFR 7.1 (purpose and
applicability), 7.2 (definitions), 7.4 (interpretation and advisory
service), 7.5 (reporting suspected violations), and 7.6 (disciplinary
and corrective actions). The revisions and clarifications proposed for
these provisions are discussed below.
As explained above in Overview of OGE Rules Implementing the Ethics
Reform Act, many of the Commission's regulations in current 11 CFR part
7 have been supplanted by OGE's regulations. Accordingly, the
Commission proposes to remove the supplanted regulations from the
Commission's Standards of Conduct in current 11 CFR part 7.
The Commission's current regulation concerning political activity
by Commissioners and Commission employees has been supplanted by the
Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993. See Public Law 103-94, 107 Stat.
1001 (1993); current 11 CFR 7.11. Therefore, the Commission proposes to
remove that regulation. See discussion below.
The regulations that the Commission proposes to retain and revise
would also be redesignated. The following chart lists the removals,
revisions, and redesignations proposed for current 11 CFR part 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This entry refers to the portion of current 11 CFR 7.1(b)
that separately includes special Government employees. See also
proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d).
\7\ This entry refers to the portion of current 11 CFR 7.1(b)
that explains that current 11 CFR part 7 applies to Commission
members and employees.
\8\ See also 5 CFR 2635.301-2635.304.
\9\ See also proposed 5 CFR part 4701.
\10\ See also 5 CFR 2635.501-2635.503 and 2635.703.
\11\ See also discussion below.
\12\ See also 5 CFR 2635.502, 2635.704-2635.705, and discussion
below.
\13\ The citation to current 11 CFR 7.15 in 11 CFR 201.1 would
be revised to cite proposed 11 CFR 7.8.
\14\ See also proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d) (including special
Government employees).
\15\ See also discussion below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redesignated Supplanted by 5 CFR
Current 11 CFR Section Proposal 11 CFR section section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.1(a)................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.101
7.1(b) \6\ & (c)......................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.102(h)
7.1(b) \7\............................... Revise.....................
7.2...................................... Revise.....................
7.3...................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2638.701-2638.706
7.4...................................... Revise and redesignate..... 7.3
7.5...................................... Revise and redesignate..... 7.4
7.6...................................... Revise and redesignate..... 7.5
7.7...................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.101
7.8...................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.201-2635.205.\8\
7.9(a)................................... Revise and redesignate..... 7.6
7.9(b)-(f)............................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.801-2635.809.\9\
7.10..................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.401-2635.403.\10\
7.11..................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. Hatch Act
Amendments.\11\
7.12..................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.402.\12\
7.13..................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.704
7.14..................................... Revise and redesignate..... 7.7
7.15..................................... Revise and redesignate..... \13\ 7.8
7.16..................................... Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.901-2635.902
7.17-7.21................................ Remove as supplanted....... .............. 2635.102(h).\14\
7.22-7.33................................ Remove as supplanted....... .............. 18 U.S.C. 207.\15\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27459]]
1. Proposed 11 CFR 7.1--Scope
Proposed 11 CFR 7.1(a) would state that the regulations in revised
11 CFR part 7 apply to all members and employees of the Commission.
Proposed 11 CFR 7.1(b) would list the other regulations in title 5 of
the CFR and proposed 5 CFR part 4701 that would govern the ethical
conduct of Commissioners and employees. Current 11 CFR 7.1(b), which
states that the regulations in current 11 CFR part 7 apply to all
employees and ``special Commission employees,'' would be removed. As
explained below, proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d) would include ``special
Government employees'' in the definition of ``employee.'' Although the
Commission's current regulations use the term ``special Commission
employee,'' the proposed regulation uses the term ``special Government
employee'' as defined at 5 CFR 2635.102(l) in order to better conform
to OGE terminology. Because proposed 11 CFR 7.1(a) states that the
regulations in revised 11 CFR part 7 apply to all Commission employees,
which includes special Government employees, current paragraph (b) is
no longer necessary. Current 11 CFR 7.1(c), which states that the
regulations in current 11 CFR part 7 must be construed in accordance
with any applicable laws, regulations, and the Commission's Labor-
Management Agreement also would be removed because it is unnecessary to
state that other laws, regulations, and agreements apply.
2. Proposed 11 CFR 7.2--Definitions
Proposed 11 CFR 7.2 would continue to set forth the definitions
used in 11 CFR part 7. The definition of ``Commission'' in current 11
CFR 7.2(a) would remain unchanged. The definition of ``Commissioner''
in current 11 CFR 7.2(b) would be revised slightly. Whereas current
paragraph (b) of 11 CFR 7.2 defines ``Commissioner,'' in part, as ``a
voting member of the Federal Election Commission,'' proposed 11 CFR
7.2(b) would delete the word ``voting'' from the definition. The word
``voting'' is no longer necessary because all members of the Commission
are currently voting members. This definition includes a Commissioner
who holds his or her position by virtue of a recess appointment.
The definition of ``conflict of interest'' in current section
7.2(c) would be removed. Instead, the Commission would rely on OGE
regulations and regulatory definitions regarding conflicts of interest,
except for the provisions in proposed 11 CFR 7.6 governing outside
employment and activities of Commissioners. See, e.g., 5 CFR 2635.801-
2635.809. Because proposed section 7.6 would not use the phrase
``conflict of interest,'' a definition of that phrase specific to 11
CFR part 7 would no longer be needed.
The terms ``Designated Agency Ethics Officer'' and ``Ethics
Officer'' in current 11 CFR 7.2(d) would be replaced with the term
``Designated Agency Ethics Official'' in proposed section 7.2(c) and
throughout the proposed regulations. See proposed 11 CFR 7.3, 7.4, and
7.5. These changes would make the Commission's regulations consistent
with OGE's regulations at 5 CFR 2638.104. Proposed 11 CFR 7.2(c) would
also include a provision from current 11 CFR 7.4 stating that the
Commission's General Counsel serves as the Designated Agency Ethics
Official.
In proposed 11 CFR 7.2(d), the definition of ``employee'' from
current 11 CFR 7.2(e) would be amended to include a ``special
Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a).'' OGE regulations
at 5 CFR 2635.102(h) include ``special Government employee'' within the
general definition of ``employee,'' thus subjecting special Government
employees to the same Standards of Conduct as other employees, with
certain limitations. Proposed section 7.2(d) would operate similarly.
Proposed section 7.2(e) defines ``ex parte communication'' for the
purposes of 11 CFR part 7. This definition is based on the definition
of ``ex parte communication'' at 11 CFR 201.2(a) applicable to non-
enforcement situations.\16\ Similar to that definition, proposed
section 7.9(e) defines ``ex parte communication'' as any written or
oral communication by any person outside the agency to any Commissioner
or any member of any Commissioner's staff, but not to any other
Commission employee, that imparts information or argument regarding
prospective Commission enforcement action or potential action
concerning any pending enforcement matter. Similar to current
Commission regulations at 11 CFR 111.22 and part 201, the proposed
definition is limited to Commissioners and their staff members because
the Commissioners are empowered to make decisions on enforcement
matters, and their staff members are their confidential assistants on
these matters. The Commission notes that ``matter'' as used in the
proposed rule includes enforcement Matters Under Review, Administrative
Fines, and Alternative Dispute Resolution cases (``ADR''). See also
discussion of proposed 11 CFR 7.9, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The treatment of ex parte communications in enforcement
matters is addressed in 11 CFR 111.22. The treatment of ex parte
communications in audits, rulemakings, advisory opinions, public
funding cases, and litigation matters is covered by 11 CFR part 201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed section 7.2(f) defines the term ``Inspector General.'' The
definitions of ``former employee,'' ``official responsibility,''
``person,'' and ``special Commission employee'' at current 11 CFR
7.2(f), (g), (i), and (j), respectively, would be removed from proposed
section 7.2 as these definitions are no longer necessary. In addition,
paragraph (h) of current 11 CFR 7.2 defining ``outside employment or
other outside activity'' would be removed. Because the Commission
proposes, with OGE concurrence, to replace much of current 11 CFR 7.9
(outside employment or activities by Commission employees) with a
supplemental regulation at 5 CFR 4701.102, paragraph (h) of current 11
CFR 7.2 defining ``outside employment or other outside activity'' would
be superfluous.
3. Proposed 11 CFR 7.3--Interpretation and Advisory Service
Proposed 11 CFR 7.3 is a revised version of current 11 CFR 7.4,
which addresses interpretation and advisory service. Proposed 11 CFR
7.3(a) adds references to 5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, and 4701
as subjects on which a Commissioner or employee may seek interpretation
and advice. Also, proposed paragraph (a) identifies the DAEO as the
person from whom advice should be sought. Proposed paragraph (b)
clarifies that the DAEO, a Commissioner, or an employee may request an
opinion from the Director of OGE concerning interpretations of 5 CFR
parts 2634, 2635, or 2640.
4. Proposed 11 CFR 7.4--Reporting Suspected Violations
Proposed 11 CFR 7.4 is a revised version of current 11 CFR 7.5 and
addresses the reporting of suspected violations of the FEC's Standards
of Conduct and OGE's Standards of Ethical Conduct. Proposed section 7.4
requires the reporting of suspected violations of 5 CFR parts 735,
2634, 2635, 2640, and 4701 or revised 11 CFR part 7 to the DAEO, the
Inspector General, or other appropriate law enforcement authorities.
5. Proposed 11 CFR 7.5--Corrective Action
Proposed 11 CFR 7.5 informs employees that a violation of the FEC's
Standards of Conduct or OGE's Standards of Ethical Conduct may be cause
for appropriate corrective action, disciplinary action, or adverse
action, in
[[Page 27460]]
addition to any penalty prescribed by law, including criminal
penalties. Proposed section 7.5 is based on current paragraph 7.6(a).
Procedures for taking corrective, disciplinary, and adverse actions are
set forth in other authority. Accordingly, the procedures in current
paragraphs 7.6(b) and (c) are unnecessary and would be deleted.
6. Proposed 11 CFR 7.6--Outside Employment and Activities by
Commissioners
Proposed 11 CFR 7.6 addresses outside employment or activities of
Commissioners.\17\ FECA provides authority for additional restrictions
on Commissioners' outside employment and activities. See 2 U.S.C.
437c(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Outside activities of all FEC employees are addressed in
OGE's Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR 2635.801-2635.809,
which, when the standards became effective in February 1993,
superseded the Commission's current regulations at 11 CFR 7.9(b)-
(f). Commissioners have additional limitations on outside activities
as described in proposed 11 CFR 7.6 and 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to the current rule at 11 CFR 7.9(a), proposed 11 CFR 7.6
states that no Commissioner may devote a substantial portion of his or
her time to any other business, vocation, or employment. This
regulation would also retain the current rule's allowance of a 90-day
period for a Commissioner, following the start of Commission service,
to limit such activity.
As noted in the 1986 Explanation and Justification for the current
rule on Commissioners' outside activities, the use of the words
``substantial portion'' of a Commissioner's time to trigger the
regulation's prohibitions is based on the legislative history of 2
U.S.C. 437c(a)(3). See Explanation and Justification for Final Rules on
Standards of Conduct for Agency Employees, 51 FR 34440, 34442 (Sept.
29, 1986). The Conference Report that accompanied the 1976 amendments
to FECA discusses 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3): ``The conferees agree that the
requirement is intended to apply to members who devote a substantial
portion of their time to such business, vocation, or employment
activities.'' H.R. Rep. No. 94-1057, at 34 (1976) (Conf. Rep.),
reprinted in Legislative History of Federal Election Campaign Act
Amendments of 1976, at 1028 (1977). The proposed rule continues this
interpretation.
7. Proposed 11 CFR 7.7--Prohibition Against Making Complaints and
Investigations Public
FECA prohibits any person from making public ``any notification or
investigation'' of a complaint under 2 U.S.C. 437g without the written
consent of the person receiving the notification or with respect to
whom the investigation is made. 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(12)(A); 11 CFR 111.21.
Proposed 11 CFR 7.7 derives its authority from that provision of FECA.
The proposed rule follows current 11 CFR 7.14.
8. Proposed 11 CFR 7.8--Ex Parte Communications in Enforcement Actions
Proposed 11 CFR 7.8 is a revised version of current 11 CFR 7.15 and
addresses ex parte communications. The title of proposed 11 CFR 7.8
clarifies that the rule applies specifically to ex parte communications
in enforcement matters. Proposed 11 CFR 7.8(a) and (d) would revise the
rule to clarify that the prohibition on ex parte communications would
apply only to Commissioners and any member of a Commissioner's staff.
These proposed changes would conform proposed 11 CFR 7.8 to the current
ex parte rules in 11 CFR 111.22 and part 201. See also discussion of
proposed 11 CFR 7.2(e), above. Proposed section 7.8 also contains
nonsubstantive revisions from paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) of current
section 7.15. Finally, proposed 11 CFR 7.8 would add references to 11
CFR 111.22, governing ex parte communications made in connection with
Commission enforcement actions, and 11 CFR part 201, governing ex parte
communications made in connection with public funding, audits,
litigation, rulemakings, and advisory opinions. See proposed 11 CFR
7.8(e). The Commission seeks comment on these changes to its ex parte
communication rules.
9. Proposed Removal of Current 11 CFR 7.11--Political and Organization
Activity
The Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993 \18\ lifted many of the
restrictions imposed by the original Hatch Act on most Federal
employees with regard to participation in political campaigns. However,
Congress specifically addressed the FEC in the Hatch Act Amendments and
left all of the original Hatch Act's restrictions in place for
employees of the Commission, other than Commissioners. See 5 U.S.C.
7323(b)(1) and (2). In contrast to the Commissioners, Commission
employees may not give a political contribution to a Member of
Congress, an employee of the Executive Branch (other than the President
or Vice President), or an officer of a uniformed service. 5 U.S.C.
7323(b)(1). Additionally, Commission employees may not ``take an active
part in political management or political campaigns.'' 5 U.S.C.
7323(b)(2)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Public Law 103-94, 107 Stat. 1001 (1993) (``Hatch Act
Amendments'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hatch Act, as amended, prohibits certain political activities
by Commissioners such as (1) using official authority or influence to
interfere with an election, (2) knowingly soliciting or discouraging
political activity by anyone subject to a Commission audit or
investigation, (3) soliciting or receiving political contributions
(except in certain, narrowly limited circumstances), or (4) being a
candidate for public office in a partisan election. 5 U.S.C. 7323(a).
OPM has authority to issue regulations regarding the Hatch Act
Amendments, and the Office of Special Counsel (``OSC'') interprets and
enforces those regulations. See 5 U.S.C. 1103(a)(5) and 7325. No
provisions in the Hatch Act Amendments empower any agencies other than
OPM to issue regulations pursuant to the Hatch Act Amendments, and no
provision in FECA directly refers to the Hatch Act Amendments or
previous Hatch Act restrictions. OPM has issued a regulation expressly
prescribing the extent to which the political activities of employees
may be limited beyond the restrictions in the Hatch Act Amendments.
This OPM regulation provides that: ``No further proscriptions or
restrictions may be imposed upon employees covered under this
regulation except: (a) Employees who are appointed by the President by
and with the advice and consent of the Senate; (b) Employees who are
appointed by the President; (c) Non-career senior executive service
members; (d) Schedule C employees, 5 CFR 213.3301, 213.3302; and (e)
Any other employees who serve at the pleasure of the President.'' See 5
CFR 734.104.
The Commission has received an advisory opinion from OSC as to the
scope of the Commission's authority to interpret the Hatch Act
Amendments regarding Commissioners and Commission employees.\19\ The
specific question asked was whether the Commission may adopt a
regulation that would forbid a Commissioner or a Commission employee
from publicly supporting, or working for, or contributing to, a
candidate, political party, or political committee subject to the
jurisdiction of the Commission, even if in the case of public support,
the activity is not done in concert with the
[[Page 27461]]
candidate, political party, or political committee. In its opinion, the
OSC noted the OPM regulations cited above and stated with respect to
employees that ``the FEC cannot further restrict the political activity
of its regular employees by forbidding them from publicly supporting or
contributing to a candidate, political party, or political committee
subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.'' U.S. Office of Special
Counsel Advisory Opinion, OSC File No. AD-03-0095, at 2 (Aug. 29,
2003). The OSC opinion also noted with respect to Commissioners that
``the FEC has no authority to adopt regulations that would forbid a
Commissioner from publicly supporting, working for, or contributing to
a candidate, political party, or political committee subject to the
jurisdiction of the FEC.'' Id. at 2-3. Its final conclusion was that
``the FEC may not adopt regulations that would limit the political
activity of FEC employees or Commissioners beyond the restrictions set
forth in the Hatch Act.'' \20\ Id. at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ A copy of the Office of Special Counsel's opinion is
available on the Commission's Web site at https://www.fec.gov/law/law_rulemakings.shtml under ``Standards of Conduct.''
\20\ Under 5 U.S.C. 1212, the advisory opinion authority of the
OSC is limited to matters related to the Hatch Act. Therefore, the
conclusions of the opinion are also limited to interpretations of
the Hatch Act and OPM regulations. They do not apply to any separate
statutory authority under FECA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the Commission proposes to delete current section 7.11
because it is inconsistent with the Hatch Act Amendments.
10. Proposed Removal of Current 11 CFR 7.12--Membership in Associations
The Commission proposes to remove current 11 CFR 7.12, which
addresses employee and Commissioner membership in associations. In
1991, OGE issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that included proposed
regulations concerning participation in professional associations. See
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch, 56 FR 33778 (July 23, 1991). OGE
decided, however, to reserve action in its final rule on this topic as
a result of the overwhelming response to its request for comments. See
Explanation and Justification for Final Rule on Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 57 FR 35006 (Aug. 7,
1992). The Commission agrees with the position taken by OGE in its
rulemaking that ethical concerns regarding membership in
nongovernmental associations or organizations may be addressed under
the more general standards in 5 CFR part 2635. See 57 FR at 35035.
Among those general provisions that are applicable are 5 CFR 2635.402
(concerning disqualifying financial interests), 5 CFR 2635.502
(concerning personal and business relationships), and 5 CFR 2635.704
and 2635.705 (concerning use of government property and official time).
11. Proposed Removal of Current 11 CFR Part 7, Subpart D (Post
Employment Conflict of Interest: Procedure for Administrative
Enforcement Proceedings)
Current 11 CFR part 7, subpart D, concerns administrative
procedures to be followed for investigations of post-employment
conflict-of-interest violations by individuals who have left Commission
employment. Subpart D was based on a prior version of 18 U.S.C. 207 and
5 CFR parts 2637 and 2641. When subpart D was adopted, 18 U.S.C. 207(j)
authorized agency proceedings against individuals who violated that
section and required that ``departments and agencies shall, in
consultation with the Director of the Office of Government Ethics,
establish procedures to carry out this subsection.''
Subsequently, however, 18 U.S.C. 207(j) was amended and the section
authorizing administrative procedures and the authority to draft
regulations regarding the procedures was removed and replaced.\21\ The
Commission has no pending post-employment situations concerning
employees who left service prior to the repeal of this provision.
Accordingly, the Commission is proposing to remove 11 CFR part 7,
subpart D pertaining to proceedings regarding post-employment conflicts
of interest in its entirety. Please note that former employees would
remain subject to Department of Justice criminal prosecution under 18
U.S.C. 207 for post-employment conflict of interest violations. See 18
U.S.C. 216.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Public Law 101-189, Div. A, Title VIII, Part B, sec.
814(d)(2), 103 Stat. 1352, 1499 (1989).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification of No Effect Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission certifies that the attached proposed rules, if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The basis of this certification
is that this rulemaking affects only the appointed members of the
Federal Election Commission and its employees. The members of the
Commission and its employees are individuals, and are not small
entities under 5 U.S.C. 601.
List of Subjects
5 CFR Part 4701
Conflict of interests, Government employees, Outside activities.
11 CFR Part 7
Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests,
Government employees, Political activities (government employees).
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Election
Commission, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics,
proposes to amend title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the
Federal Election Commission further proposes to amend chapter I of
title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
TITLE 5--GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES
1. Add Chapter XXXVII, consisting of part 4701, to read as follows:
Chapter XXXVII--Federal Election Commission
PART 4701--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Sec.
4701.101 Scope.
4701.102 Prior approval for certain outside employment.
Authority: 2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3); 5 U.S.C. 7301; 5 U.S.C. app.
(Ethics in Government Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR
p. 215 (1989 Comp.), as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR
p. 306 (1990 Comp.); 5 CFR 2635.105 and 2635.803.
Sec. 4701.101 Scope.
(a) In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part
set forth standards of conduct that apply to members and other
employees of the Federal Election Commission (``Commission'').
(b) In addition, members and other employees of the Commission are
subject to the following regulations:
(1) 5 CFR part 735 (Employee Responsibilities and Conduct);
(2) 5 CFR part 2634 (Executive Branch Financial Disclosure,
Qualified Trusts, and Certificates of Divestiture);
(3) 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of
the Executive Branch); and
(4) 11 CFR part 7 (Standards of Conduct for Members and Employees
of the Federal Election Commission).
Sec. 4701.102 Prior approval for certain outside employment.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
[[Page 27462]]
(1) Active participant has the meaning set forth in 5 CFR
2635.502(b)(1)(v).
(2) Employee has the meaning set forth in 5 CFR 2635.102(h).
(3) Definition of outside employment. For purposes of this section,
outside employment means any form of non-Federal employment, business
relationship or activity involving the provision of personal services,
whether or not for compensation. It includes, but is not limited to,
services as an officer, director, agent, advisor, attorney, consultant,
contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher, speaker, writer, or any
other services provided by an individual. It includes writing when done
under an arrangement with another person for production or publication
of the written product. The definition does not include participation
in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional,
social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service or civic
organization, unless:
(i) The activity provides compensation other than reimbursement of
expenses;
(ii) The activities of the non-Federal organization are devoted
substantially to matters relating to the employee's official duties as
defined in 5 CFR 2635.807(a)(2)(i)(B)-(E) and the employee will serve
as officer or director of the non-Federal organization; or
(iii) The activities will involve the provision of consultative or
professional services. Consultative services means the provision of
personal services, including the rendering of advice or consultation,
which requires advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning
customarily acquired by a course of specialized instruction and study
in an institution of higher education, hospital, or similar facility.
Professional services means the provision of personal services,
including the rendering of advice or consultation, which involves
application of the skills of a profession as defined in 5 CFR
2636.305(b)(1) or involves a fiduciary relationship as defined in 5 CFR
2636.305(b)(2).
(4) Related to the employee's official duties means that the
outside employment meets one or more of the tests described in 5 CFR
2635.807(a)(2)(i)(B)-(E). Outside employment related to the employee's
official duties includes:
(i) Outside employment that an employee has been invited to
participate in because of his or her official position rather than his
or her expertise in the subject matter;
(ii) Outside employment in which an employee has been asked to
participate by a person that has interests that may be substantially
affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's
official duties;
(iii) Outside employment that conveys information derived from
nonpublic information gained during the course of government
employment; and
(iv) Outside employment that deals in significant part with any
matter to which the employee is or has been officially assigned in the
last year, or any ongoing or announced Commission policy, program, or
operation.
(b) Prior approval requirement. An employee of the Commission,
including a member of a Commissioner's staff, but not a member of the
Commission or a special Government employee, shall obtain written
approval from the Designated Agency Ethics Official before engaging in
outside employment where the services provided:
(1) Are related to the employee's official duties; or
(2) Involve the application of the same specialized skills or the
same educational background as used in the performance of the
employee's official duties.
(c) Submission of requests for approval. (1) The request for
approval shall be sent through all of the employee's supervisors and
shall state the name of the person, group, or organization for whom the
outside employment is to be performed; the type of outside employment
to be performed; and the proposed hours of, and approximate dates of,
the outside employment.
(2) Upon a significant change in the nature or scope of the outside
employment or in the employee's official position, the employee shall
submit a revised request for approval.
(d) Standard for approval. Approval shall be granted only upon a
determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve
conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR
part 2635.
TITLE 11--FEDERAL ELECTIONS
Chapter I--Federal Election Commission
2. Revise part 7 to read as follows:
PART 7--STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Sec.
7.1 Scope.
7.2 Definitions.
7.3 Interpretation and advisory service.
7.4 Reporting suspected violations.
7.5 Corrective action.
7.6 Outside employment and activities by Commissioners.
7.7 Prohibition against making complaints and investigations public.
7.8 Ex parte communications in enforcement actions.
Authority: 2 U.S.C. 437c, 437d, and 438; 5 U.S.C. 7321 et seq.
and app. 3.
Sec. 7.1 Scope.
(a) The regulations in this part apply to members and employees of
the Federal Election Commission (``Commission'').
(b) In addition, members and employees of the Commission are
subject to the following regulations:
(1) 5 CFR part 735 (Employee Responsibilities and Conduct);
(2) 5 CFR part 2634 (Executive Branch Financial Disclosure,
Qualified Trusts, and Certificates of Divestiture);
(3) 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of
the Executive Branch); and
(4) 5 CFR part 4701 (Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Federal Election Commission).
Sec. 7.2 Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) Commission means the Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463.
(b) Commissioner means a member of the Federal Election Commission,
in accordance with 2 U.S.C. 437c.
(c) Designated Agency Ethics Official means the employee designated
by the Commission to administer the provisions of the Ethics in
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. appendix), as amended, and includes a
designee of the Designated Agency Ethics Official. The General Counsel
serves as the Commission's Designated Agency Ethics Official.
(d) Employee means an employee of the Federal Election Commission
and includes a special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C.
202(a).
(e) Ex parte communication means any written or oral communication
by any person outside the agency to any Commissioner or any member of
any Commissioner's staff, but not to any other Commission employee,
that imparts information or argument regarding prospective Commission
action or potential action concerning any pending enforcement matter.
(f) Inspector General means the individual appointed by the
Commission to administer the provisions of the Inspector General Act of
1978, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix), and includes any designee of the
Inspector General.
[[Page 27463]]
Sec. 7.3 Interpretation and advisory service.
(a) A Commissioner or employee seeking advice and guidance on
matters covered by this part or 5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, or
4701 may consult with the Designated Agency Ethics Official. The
Designated Agency Ethics Official should be consulted before
undertaking any action that might violate this part or 5 CFR parts 735,
2634, 2635, 2640, or 4701 governing the conduct of Commissioners or
employees.
(b) The Designated Agency Ethics Official, a Commissioner, or an
employee may request an opinion from the Director of the Office of
Government Ethics regarding an interpretation of 5 CFR parts 2634,
2635, or 2640.
Sec. 7.4 Reporting suspected violations.
Commissioners and employees shall disclose immediately any
suspected violation of a statute or of a rule set forth in this part or
of a rule set forth in 5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, or 4701 to
the Designated Agency Ethics Official, the Office of Inspector General,
or other appropriate law enforcement authorities.
Sec. 7.5 Corrective action.
A violation of this part or 5 CFR parts 735, 2634, 2635, 2640, or
4701 by an employee may be cause for appropriate corrective,
disciplinary, or adverse action in addition to any penalty prescribed
by law.
Sec. 7.6 Outside employment and activities by Commissioners.
No member of the Commission may devote a substantial portion of his
or her time to any other business, vocation, or employment. Any
individual who is engaging substantially in any other business,
vocation, or employment at the time such individual begins to serve as
a member of the Commission will appropriately limit such activity no
later than 90 days after beginning to serve as such a member.
Sec. 7.7 Prohibition against making complaints and investigations
public.
(a) Commission employees are warned that they are subject to
criminal penalties if they discuss or otherwise make public any matters
pertaining to a complaint or investigation under 2 U.S.C. 437g, without
the written permission of the person complained against or being
investigated. Such communications are prohibited by 2 U.S.C.
437g(a)(12)(A).
(b) Section 437g(a)(12)(B) of title 2 of the United States Code
provides as follows: ``Any member or employee of the Commission, or any
other person, who violates the provisions of [2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(12)(A)]
shall be fined not more than $2,000. Any such member, employee, or
other person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions of [2
U.S.C. 437g(a)(12)(A)] shall be fined not more than $5,000.''
Sec. 7.8 Ex parte communications in enforcement actions.
In order to avoid the possibility of prejudice, real or apparent,
to the public interest in enforcement actions pending before the
Commission pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g:
(a) Except to the extent required for the disposition of
enforcement matters as required by law (as, for example, during the
normal course of an investigation or a conciliation effort), no
Commissioner or member of any Commissioner's staff shall make or
entertain any ex parte communications.
(b) The prohibition of this section shall apply from the time a
proper complaint is filed with the Commission pursuant to 2 U.S.C.
437g(a)(1) or from the time that the Commission determines on the basis
of information ascertained in the normal course of its supervisory
responsibilities that it has reason to believe that a violation has
occurred or may occur pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(2), and shall remain
in force until the Commission has concluded all action with respect to
the enforcement matter in question.
(c) Any written communication prohibited by paragraph (a) of this
section shall be delivered to the General Counsel, who shall place the
communication in the case file.
(d) A Commissioner or member of any Commissioner's staff involved
in handling enforcement actions who receives an offer to make an oral
communication or any communication concerning any enforcement action
pending before the Commission as described in paragraph (a) of this
section, shall decline to listen to such communication. If unsuccessful
in preventing the communication, the Commissioner or employee shall
advise the person making the communication that he or she will not
consider the communication and shall prepare a statement setting forth
the substance and circumstances of the communication. Within 48 hours
of receipt of the communication, the Commissioner or any member of any
Commissioner's staff shall prepare a statement setting forth the
substance and circumstances of the communication and shall deliver the
statement to the General Counsel for placing in the file in the manner
set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
(e) Additional rules governing ex parte communications made in
connection with Commission enforcement actions are found at 11 CFR
111.22. Rules governing ex parte communications made in connection with
public funding, Commission audits, litigation, rulemakings, and
advisory opinions are found at 11 CFR part 201.
Dated: May 11, 2010.
On behalf of the Commission.
Matthew S. Petersen,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
Approved: May 7, 2010.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2010-11599 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P