Target Corporation: Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 26939-26941 [2010-11460]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 92 / Thursday, May 13, 2010 / Notices
—A U.S. citizen residing in the United
States, or able to travel to the United
States or other location to attend
official Business Dialogue meetings;
—The President or CEO (or comparable
level of responsibility) of a private
sector company, or, in the case of
large companies, a person having
substantial responsibility for the
company’s commercial activities in
Iraq, either of which shall possess
unique experience with or specialized
knowledge about the commercial
environment in Iraq; or the head of a
non-profit entity, such as a trade or
industry association, who possesses
unique technical expertise, and the
ability to provide counsel with
respect to private sector business
development in Iraq; and
—Not a registered foreign agent under
the Foreign Agents Registration Act of
1938, as amended.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Members will be selected on the basis
of who best will carry out the objectives
of the Business Dialogue as described
above and as stated in the Terms of
Reference for the Dialogue. (The Terms
of Reference are available from the point
of contact listed above.)
Recommendations for appointment will
be made to the Secretary of Commerce.
All candidates will be notified of
whether they have been selected.
To be considered for membership,
please submit the following information
as instructed in the addresses and dates
captions above: Name(s) and title(s) of
the individual(s) requesting
consideration; name and address of
company or non-profit entity to be
represented; size of the company or
non-profit entity; description of relevant
product, service, or technical expertise;
size of company’s export trade,
investment, and/or international
program experience; nature of
operations or interest in Iraq;
responsibilities of the candidate within
the company or non-profit entity; and a
brief statement of why the candidate
should be appointed, including
information about the candidate’s
ability to initiate and be responsible for
activities in which the Business
Dialogue will be active.
Valerie Dees,
Acting Director, Iraq Investment and
Reconstruction Task Force.
[FR Doc. 2010–11471 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DA–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 May 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 09–C0037]
Target Corporation: Provisional
Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement
and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Target
Corporation, containing a civil penalty
of $600,000.00.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by May 28,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 09–C0037, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean R. Ward, Lead Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the
General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408; telephone (301) 504–7602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: May 6, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
Settlement Agreement and Order
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20,
Target Corporation (‘‘Target ’’) and the
staff (‘‘Staff ’’) of the United States
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘CPSC ’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’) enter into
this Settlement Agreement
(‘‘Agreement ’’). The Agreement and the
incorporated attached Order (‘‘Order ’’)
settle the Staff’s allegations set forth
below.
Parties
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency established
pursuant to the Consumer Product
Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089
(‘‘CPSA’’). The Commission is
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26939
responsible for the enforcement of the
CPSA.
3. Target is a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of
Minnesota, with its principal offices
located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. At
all times relevant hereto, Target
imported and sold toys and children’s
products.
Staff Allegations
4. From May 2006 through October
2006, Target imported into the United
States approximately 156,300 units of
Various Kool Toyz children’s products
consisting of the following models:
Truck Carry Case; Tiny Playground Set/
Dream House Play Set; Discovery
Dinosaur Habitat; Air, Land and Sea
Defender Play Set; and the Tank and
Helicopter Action Figure Play Set (‘‘Kool
Toyz’’). Target sold the Kool Toyz to
consumers at retail stores nationwide
owned or operated by Target from July
2006 through September 2006 for
between $10 and $20 per unit.
5. On approximately November 2006,
Target imported into the United States
about 5,000 Anima-Bamboo Collection
Games (‘‘Collection Games’’) units.
Target sold the Collection Games to
consumers at retail stores nationwide
owned or operated by Target from
approximately December 2006 through
April 2007 for $10 per unit.
6. From June 2006 through June 2007,
Target imported into the United States
about 350,000 units of the Happy Giddy
Gardening Tools (‘‘Toy Tools’’). Target
sold the Toy Tools to consumers at
retail stores nationwide owned or
operated by Target from approximately
August 2006 through August 2007 for
between $3 and $10 per unit.
7. From June 2007 through August
2007, Target imported into the United
States about 1900 units of Sunny Patch
Chairs (‘‘Toy Chairs’’). Target sold the
Toy Chairs to consumers at retail stores
nationwide owned or operated by Target
from approximately June 2007 through
August 2007 for about $10 per unit.
8. The Kool Toyz, Collection Games,
Toy Tools and Toy Chairs (collectively,
‘‘Target Products’’) are ‘‘consumer
products,’’ and, at all times relevant
hereto, Target was a ‘‘manufacturer’’
and/or ‘‘retailer’’ of those consumer
product(s), which were ‘‘distributed in
commerce,’’ as those terms are defined
in CPSA section 3(a)(3), (5), (8), (11) and
(13), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2052(a)(3), (5), (8), (11)
and (13).
9. The Target Products are articles
intended to be entrusted to or for use by
children, and, therefore, are subject to
the requirements of the Commission’s
Ban of Lead-Containing Paint and
Certain Consumer Products bearing
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
26940
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 92 / Thursday, May 13, 2010 / Notices
Lead-Containing Paint, 16 CFR Part
1303 (the ‘‘Ban’’). Under the Ban, toys
and other children’s articles must not
bear ‘‘lead-containing paint,’’ defined as
paint or other surface coating materials
whose lead content is more than 0.06
percent of the weight of the total
nonvolatile content of the paint or the
weight of the dried paint film. 16 CFR
1303.2(b)(1).
10. On October 6, 2006, Target
submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had
commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing for the
presence of lead in surface coatings on
multiple models of the Kool Toyz in
response to a consumer complaint that
parts of the product were breaking. As
expressed in several test reports, the test
results demonstrated that the samples of
the Kool Toyz contained a total lead
content in excess of the permissible 0.06
percent limit set forth in the Ban.
11. On April 17, 2007, Target
submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had
commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing of samples
for the presence of lead in surface
coatings on multiple models of the
Collection Games from a store audit. As
expressed in several test reports, the test
results demonstrated that the samples of
the Collection Games contained lead
content in excess of the permissible 0.06
percent limit set forth in the Ban.
12. On August 10, 2007, the Staff
informed Target that it had tested a store
sample of Toy Tools using the
Association of Official Analytical
Chemists (‘‘AOAC’’) method 974.02 lead
analysis of paint which demonstrated
that orange surface coating on the tested
sample contained a total lead content in
excess of the permissible 0.06 percent
limit set forth in the Ban.
13. On September 14, 2007, Target
submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had
commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing of store
samples of the Toy Chairs. As expressed
in its test reports, the test result
demonstrated that the sample of the Toy
Chairs contained lead content in excess
of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set
forth in the Ban.
14. On November 15, 2006, the
Commission and Target announced a
consumer-level recall of about 156,300
units of the Kool Toyz because ‘‘[s]ome
of the toys contain lead paint, which is
toxic if ingested by young children and
can cause adverse health effects.’’ On
May 2, 2007, the Commission and
Target announced a consumer-level
recall of about 5,000 units of Collection
Games because ‘‘[t]he toys in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 May 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
bamboo game sets could contain lead
paint, which is toxic if ingested by
young children and can cause adverse
health effects.’’ On September 26, 2007,
the Commission and Target announced
a consumer-level recall of about 350,000
Toy Tools and Toy Chairs because ‘‘[t]he
surface paint on the recalled gardening
tools and chairs contains excessive
levels of lead, violating the federal lead
paint standard.’’
15. Although Target reported no
incidents or injuries associated with the
Kool Toyz, Collection Games, Toy Tools
and Toys Chairs, it failed to take
adequate action to ensure that none
would bear or contain lead-containing
paint, thereby creating a risk of lead
poisoning and adverse health effects to
children.
16. The Kool Toyz, Collection Games,
Toy Tools and Toy Chairs constitute
‘‘banned hazardous products’’ under
CPSA section 8 and the Ban, 15 U.S.C.
2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b),
in that they bear or contain paint or
other surface coating materials whose
lead content exceeds the permissible
limit of 0.06 percent of the weight of the
total nonvolatile content of the paint or
the weight of the of dried paint film.
Between May 2006 and August 2007,
Target sold, manufactured for sale,
offered for sale, distributed in
commerce, or imported into the United
States, or caused one or more of such
acts, with respect to the aforesaid
banned hazardous Kool Toyz, Collection
Games, Toy Tools and Toy Chairs, in
violation of section 19(a)(1) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Target
committed these prohibited acts
‘‘knowingly,’’ as that term is defined in
section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2069(d).
17. Pursuant to section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Target is subject
to civil penalties for the aforementioned
violations.
Target’s Responsive Allegations
18. Target denies the Staff’s
allegations set forth above that it
violated the CPSA or that it failed to
take adequate action to ensure that none
of its products contained excessive
levels of lead-containing paint.
19. At all times relevant to this matter,
Target’s quality assurance procedures
were reasonable and satisfied the
standard of care. Target’s knowledge
when the subject products were
imported and offered for sale was that
they complied with the lead paint
standard. Notwithstanding satisfactory
pre-production test results, certain units
were subsequently found to contain
impermissible levels of lead paint.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20. Target notified CPSC of the Kool
Toyz and Collection Games issues
promptly upon discovering them. CPSC
discovered the Toy Tools/Toy Chairs
issue and brought it to Target’s
attention. After promptly investigating
the facts, Target voluntarily conducted
each of the three subject product recalls
in cooperation with CPSC.
21. Before the Target Products were
manufactured, Target had already begun
implementing Multi-Stage Testing
(‘‘MST’’) and a Quality Assurance
Initiative as part of its overall process
designed to help ensure the quality and
safety of the products that Target sells.
Target enhanced its procedures by
addressing through MST the monitoring
of product quality both before and
during production by conducting three
stages of testing—pre-production, top of
production, and ongoing random testing
of production units.
Agreement of the Parties
22. Under the CPSA, the Commission
has jurisdiction over this matter and
over Target.
23. The parties enter into the
Agreement for settlement purposes only.
The Agreement does not constitute an
admission by Target, or a determination
by the Commission, that Target has
knowingly violated the CPSA.
24. In settlement of the Staff’s
allegations, Target shall pay a civil
penalty in the amount of six-hundred
thousand dollars ($600,000.00) within
twenty (20) calendar days of service of
the Commission’s final Order accepting
the Agreement. The payment shall be by
check payable to the order of the United
States Treasury.
25. Upon the Commission’s
provisional acceptance of the
Agreement, the Agreement shall be
placed on the public record and
published in the Federal Register in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). In
accordance with 16 C.F.R. § 1118.20(f),
if the Commission does not receive any
written request not to accept the
Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the
Agreement shall be deemed finally
accepted on the sixteenth (16th) day
after the date it is published in the
Federal Register.
26. Upon the Commission’s final
acceptance of the Agreement and
issuance of the final Order, Target
knowingly, voluntarily, and completely
waives any rights it may have in this
matter to the following: (1) An
administrative or judicial hearing; (2)
judicial review or other challenge or
contest of the validity of the
Commission’s Order or actions; (3) a
determination by the Commission of
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 92 / Thursday, May 13, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
whether Target failed to comply with
the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings
of fact and conclusions of law; and (5)
any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
27. The Commission may publicize
the terms of the Agreement and Order.
28. The Agreement and Order shall
apply to, and be binding upon, Target
and each of its successors and assigns.
29. The Commission issues the Order
under the provisions of the CPSA, and
violation of the Order may subject
Target and each of its successors and
assigns to appropriate legal action.
30. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those
contained in the Agreement and Order
may not be used to vary or contradict its
terms. The Agreement shall not be
waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except in a writing
that is executed by the party against
whom such waiver, amendment,
modification, or alteration is sought to
be enforced.
31. If after the effective date hereof,
any provision of the Agreement and
Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable under present or future
laws effective during the terms of the
Agreement and Order, such provision
shall be fully severable. The balance of
the Agreement and Order shall remain
in full force and effect, unless the
Commission and Target agree that
severing the provision materially affects
the purpose of the Agreement and
Order.
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between Target
Corporation (‘‘Target’’) and the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the
Commission having jurisdiction over
the subject matter and over Target, and
it appearing that the Settlement
Agreement and Order are in the public
interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement
Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Target shall pay
a civil penalty in the amount of sixhundred thousand dollars ($600,000.00)
within twenty (20) calendar days of
service of the Commission’s final Order
accepting the Agreement. The payment
shall be made by check payable to the
order of the United States Treasury.
Upon the failure of Target to make
any of the foregoing payments when
due, interest on the unpaid amount
shall accrue and be paid by Target at the
federal legal rate of interest set forth at
28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b).
26941
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in this Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
smar@omb.eop.gov.
The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order agency’s estimate of the burden of the
issued on the 30th day of September,
proposed collection of information,
2009.
including the validity of the
By Order of the Commission:
methodology and assumptions used;
lllllllllllllllllllll
• Propose ways to enhance the
Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary
quality, utility, and clarity of the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
information to be collected; and
[FR Doc. 2010–11460 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am]
• Propose ways to minimize the
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
COMMUNITY SERVICE
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
Target Corporation:
Information Collection; Submission for
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
OMB Review, Comment Request
Dated: 9–17–09
submissions of responses.
By: lllllllllllllllllll
AGENCY: Corporation for National and
Stacia Andersen, President
Comments
Community Service.
Target Sourcing Services
A 60-day public comment Notice was
1000 Nicollet Mall
ACTION: Notice.
published in the Federal Register on
Minneapolis, MN 55403
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
Friday, March 5, 2010. This comment
Dated: 9–17–09
By: lllllllllllllllllll and Community Service (hereinafter the period ended May 5, 2010. No public
‘‘Corporation’’), has submitted a public
comments were received from this
Eric A. Rubel, Esq.
Arnold & Porter LLP
information collection request (ICR)
Notice.
555 Twelfth Street, NW.
entitled AmeriCorps Application
Description: The Corporation is
Washington, DC 20004–1206
Instructions: Administrative, Program
seeking approval of the attached
Counsel for Target Corporation
Development, and Training grants to the AmeriCorps Application Instructions:
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Office of Management and Budget
Administrative, Program Development,
Commission Staff
(OMB) for review and approval in
and Training grants. State commissions
Cheryl A. Falvey
accordance with the Paperwork
will respond to the questions included
General Counsel
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– in this ICR in order to report on their
Office of the General Counsel
13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of
use of federal funds and progress against
Ronald G. Yelenik
this ICR, with applicable supporting
their annual plan.
Assistant General Counsel, Division of
documentation, may be obtained by
Type of Review: Renewal.
Compliance
calling the Corporation for National and
Agency: Corporation for National and
Office of the General Counsel
Community Service, Ms. Amy
Community Service.
Dated: 9–17–09
Title: AmeriCorps Application
By: lllllllllllllllllll Borgstrom at (202) 606–6930.
Individuals who use a
Instructions: Administrative, Program
Sean R. Ward
telecommunications device for the deaf
Development, and Training grants.
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance
OMB Number: 3045–0099.
(TTY–TDD) may call (202) 565–2799
Office of the General Counsel
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 May 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26939-26941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11460]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 09-C0037]
Target Corporation: Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement
Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e).
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with
Target Corporation, containing a civil penalty of $600,000.00.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 09-C0037, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean R. Ward, Lead Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-
4408; telephone (301) 504-7602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: May 6, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
Settlement Agreement and Order
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Target Corporation (``Target
'') and the staff (``Staff '') of the United States Consumer Product
Safety Commission (``CPSC '' or the ``Commission'') enter into this
Settlement Agreement (``Agreement ''). The Agreement and the
incorporated attached Order (``Order '') settle the Staff's allegations
set forth below.
Parties
2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency
established pursuant to the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2051-2089 (``CPSA''). The Commission is responsible for the enforcement
of the CPSA.
3. Target is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
Minnesota, with its principal offices located in Minneapolis,
Minnesota. At all times relevant hereto, Target imported and sold toys
and children's products.
Staff Allegations
4. From May 2006 through October 2006, Target imported into the
United States approximately 156,300 units of Various Kool Toyz
children's products consisting of the following models: Truck Carry
Case; Tiny Playground Set/Dream House Play Set; Discovery Dinosaur
Habitat; Air, Land and Sea Defender Play Set; and the Tank and
Helicopter Action Figure Play Set (``Kool Toyz''). Target sold the Kool
Toyz to consumers at retail stores nationwide owned or operated by
Target from July 2006 through September 2006 for between $10 and $20
per unit.
5. On approximately November 2006, Target imported into the United
States about 5,000 Anima-Bamboo Collection Games (``Collection Games'')
units. Target sold the Collection Games to consumers at retail stores
nationwide owned or operated by Target from approximately December 2006
through April 2007 for $10 per unit.
6. From June 2006 through June 2007, Target imported into the
United States about 350,000 units of the Happy Giddy Gardening Tools
(``Toy Tools''). Target sold the Toy Tools to consumers at retail
stores nationwide owned or operated by Target from approximately August
2006 through August 2007 for between $3 and $10 per unit.
7. From June 2007 through August 2007, Target imported into the
United States about 1900 units of Sunny Patch Chairs (``Toy Chairs'').
Target sold the Toy Chairs to consumers at retail stores nationwide
owned or operated by Target from approximately June 2007 through August
2007 for about $10 per unit.
8. The Kool Toyz, Collection Games, Toy Tools and Toy Chairs
(collectively, ``Target Products'') are ``consumer products,'' and, at
all times relevant hereto, Target was a ``manufacturer'' and/or
``retailer'' of those consumer product(s), which were ``distributed in
commerce,'' as those terms are defined in CPSA section 3(a)(3), (5),
(8), (11) and (13), 15 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 2052(a)(3), (5), (8), (11) and
(13).
9. The Target Products are articles intended to be entrusted to or
for use by children, and, therefore, are subject to the requirements of
the Commission's Ban of Lead-Containing Paint and Certain Consumer
Products bearing
[[Page 26940]]
Lead-Containing Paint, 16 CFR Part 1303 (the ``Ban''). Under the Ban,
toys and other children's articles must not bear ``lead-containing
paint,'' defined as paint or other surface coating materials whose lead
content is more than 0.06 percent of the weight of the total
nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film.
16 CFR 1303.2(b)(1).
10. On October 6, 2006, Target submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing for the presence of lead in surface
coatings on multiple models of the Kool Toyz in response to a consumer
complaint that parts of the product were breaking. As expressed in
several test reports, the test results demonstrated that the samples of
the Kool Toyz contained a total lead content in excess of the
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban.
11. On April 17, 2007, Target submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing of samples for the presence of lead in
surface coatings on multiple models of the Collection Games from a
store audit. As expressed in several test reports, the test results
demonstrated that the samples of the Collection Games contained lead
content in excess of the permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in
the Ban.
12. On August 10, 2007, the Staff informed Target that it had
tested a store sample of Toy Tools using the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists (``AOAC'') method 974.02 lead analysis of paint
which demonstrated that orange surface coating on the tested sample
contained a total lead content in excess of the permissible 0.06
percent limit set forth in the Ban.
13. On September 14, 2007, Target submitted a Full Report to CPSC
containing information that it had commissioned an independent
laboratory to conduct testing of store samples of the Toy Chairs. As
expressed in its test reports, the test result demonstrated that the
sample of the Toy Chairs contained lead content in excess of the
permissible 0.06 percent limit set forth in the Ban.
14. On November 15, 2006, the Commission and Target announced a
consumer-level recall of about 156,300 units of the Kool Toyz because
``[s]ome of the toys contain lead paint, which is toxic if ingested by
young children and can cause adverse health effects.'' On May 2, 2007,
the Commission and Target announced a consumer-level recall of about
5,000 units of Collection Games because ``[t]he toys in the bamboo game
sets could contain lead paint, which is toxic if ingested by young
children and can cause adverse health effects.'' On September 26, 2007,
the Commission and Target announced a consumer-level recall of about
350,000 Toy Tools and Toy Chairs because ``[t]he surface paint on the
recalled gardening tools and chairs contains excessive levels of lead,
violating the federal lead paint standard.''
15. Although Target reported no incidents or injuries associated
with the Kool Toyz, Collection Games, Toy Tools and Toys Chairs, it
failed to take adequate action to ensure that none would bear or
contain lead-containing paint, thereby creating a risk of lead
poisoning and adverse health effects to children.
16. The Kool Toyz, Collection Games, Toy Tools and Toy Chairs
constitute ``banned hazardous products'' under CPSA section 8 and the
Ban, 15 U.S.C. 2057 and 16 CFR 1303.1(a)(1), 1303.4(b), in that they
bear or contain paint or other surface coating materials whose lead
content exceeds the permissible limit of 0.06 percent of the weight of
the total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the of
dried paint film. Between May 2006 and August 2007, Target sold,
manufactured for sale, offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or
imported into the United States, or caused one or more of such acts,
with respect to the aforesaid banned hazardous Kool Toyz, Collection
Games, Toy Tools and Toy Chairs, in violation of section 19(a)(1) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1). Target committed these prohibited acts
``knowingly,'' as that term is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
17. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Target is
subject to civil penalties for the aforementioned violations.
Target's Responsive Allegations
18. Target denies the Staff's allegations set forth above that it
violated the CPSA or that it failed to take adequate action to ensure
that none of its products contained excessive levels of lead-containing
paint.
19. At all times relevant to this matter, Target's quality
assurance procedures were reasonable and satisfied the standard of
care. Target's knowledge when the subject products were imported and
offered for sale was that they complied with the lead paint standard.
Notwithstanding satisfactory pre-production test results, certain units
were subsequently found to contain impermissible levels of lead paint.
20. Target notified CPSC of the Kool Toyz and Collection Games
issues promptly upon discovering them. CPSC discovered the Toy Tools/
Toy Chairs issue and brought it to Target's attention. After promptly
investigating the facts, Target voluntarily conducted each of the three
subject product recalls in cooperation with CPSC.
21. Before the Target Products were manufactured, Target had
already begun implementing Multi-Stage Testing (``MST'') and a Quality
Assurance Initiative as part of its overall process designed to help
ensure the quality and safety of the products that Target sells. Target
enhanced its procedures by addressing through MST the monitoring of
product quality both before and during production by conducting three
stages of testing--pre-production, top of production, and ongoing
random testing of production units.
Agreement of the Parties
22. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this
matter and over Target.
23. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Target, or a
determination by the Commission, that Target has knowingly violated the
CPSA.
24. In settlement of the Staff's allegations, Target shall pay a
civil penalty in the amount of six-hundred thousand dollars
($600,000.00) within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the
Commission's final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be
by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury.
25. Upon the Commission's provisional acceptance of the Agreement,
the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and published in the
Federal Register in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR
1118.20(e). In accordance with 16 C.F.R. Sec. 1118.20(f), if the
Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the
Agreement within fifteen (15) days, the Agreement shall be deemed
finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th) day after the date it is
published in the Federal Register.
26. Upon the Commission's final acceptance of the Agreement and
issuance of the final Order, Target knowingly, voluntarily, and
completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the
following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial
review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the
Commission's Order or actions; (3) a determination by the Commission of
[[Page 26941]]
whether Target failed to comply with the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of
law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
27. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and
Order.
28. The Agreement and Order shall apply to, and be binding upon,
Target and each of its successors and assigns.
29. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the
CPSA, and violation of the Order may subject Target and each of its
successors and assigns to appropriate legal action.
30. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order.
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart
from those contained in the Agreement and Order may not be used to vary
or contradict its terms. The Agreement shall not be waived, amended,
modified, or otherwise altered, except in a writing that is executed by
the party against whom such waiver, amendment, modification, or
alteration is sought to be enforced.
31. If after the effective date hereof, any provision of the
Agreement and Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable
under present or future laws effective during the terms of the
Agreement and Order, such provision shall be fully severable. The
balance of the Agreement and Order shall remain in full force and
effect, unless the Commission and Target agree that severing the
provision materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order.
Target Corporation:
Dated: 9-17-09
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stacia Andersen, President
Target Sourcing Services
1000 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55403
Dated: 9-17-09
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric A. Rubel, Esq.
Arnold & Porter LLP
555 Twelfth Street, NW.
Washington, DC 20004-1206
Counsel for Target Corporation
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Staff
Cheryl A. Falvey
General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Ronald G. Yelenik
Assistant General Counsel, Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
Dated: 9-17-09
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean R. Ward
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between
Target Corporation (``Target'') and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (``Commission'') staff, and the Commission having
jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Target, and it appearing
that the Settlement Agreement and Order are in the public interest, it
is
Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Target shall pay a civil penalty in the
amount of six-hundred thousand dollars ($600,000.00) within twenty (20)
calendar days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting the
Agreement. The payment shall be made by check payable to the order of
the United States Treasury.
Upon the failure of Target to make any of the foregoing payments
when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by
Target at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C.
1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 30th day
of September, 2009.
By Order of the Commission:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
[FR Doc. 2010-11460 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P