Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-LiMo Foundation, 27000-27001 [2010-11216]

Download as PDF 27000 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 92 / Thursday, May 13, 2010 / Notices has thus failed to offer any evidence to rebut the Government’s showing that he has committed acts which render granting him a registration inconsistent with the public interest.32 See Medicine Shoppe-Jonesborough, 73 FR 364, 387 (2008) (‘‘Where the Government has made out its prima facie case, the burden shifts to the Respondent to show why [his] continued registration would nonetheless be consistent with the public interest.’’). Accordingly, these violations of the CSA and DEA regulations provide a further basis to deny Respondent’s application. Order Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823(f), as well as by 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, I hereby order that the application of Alvin Darby, M.D., for a DEA Certificate of Registration as a practitioner, be, and it hereby is, denied. This order is effective immediately. Dated: April 16, 2010. Michele M. Leonhart, Deputy Administrator. [FR Doc. 2010–11431 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am] sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 32 It is acknowledged that Respondent holds a valid state license (factor one) and has not been convicted of an offense related to the dispensing of controlled substances (factor three). However, neither of these factors is dispositive. See Edmund Chein, 72 FR 6580, 6590 (2007), aff’d Chein v. DEA, 533 F.3d 828 (DC Cir. 2008) (The authority to decide whether to grant an application for a DEA registration has been entrusted to the Attorney General and ‘‘has been delegated solely to the officials of this Agency.’’) See also id. at 6593 n.22 (absence of criminal convictions not dispositive in public interest inquiry). I further note the DI’s testimony that Respondent violated Federal law because he wrote prescriptions at his Mississippi office and did not have a registration in this State. However, the Government put forward no evidence that identifies specific prescriptions that Respondent issued after the expiration of his Mississippi registration. Moreover, in its brief, the Government does not rely on this conduct. Thus, I do not consider the allegation. The Government also argues that Respondent’s conviction for possession of cocaine can be considered under factor three. However, the conviction was not for an offense related to the manufacture, distribution, or dispensing of controlled substances and is thus not properly considered under factor three. However, as the ALJ reasoned, consistent with Agency precedent, the conviction can be considered under factor five as such other conduct which may threaten public health and safety. See ALJ at 34–35. While there is evidence that Respondent underwent treatment, and the Government does not argue that Respondent has a continuing problem with drug abuse, when coupled with the other violations proved on this record, it buttresses the conclusion that Respondent is unwilling to conform to the law and that he cannot be entrusted with a new registration. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:56 May 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 307–0690 [Note: This is not a toll-free number.] DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OJP (OJP) Docket No. 1519] Hearings of the Review Panel on Prison Rape AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Justice. ACTION: Notice of hearing. SUMMARY: The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) announces that the Review Panel on Prison Rape (Panel) will hold hearings in Washington, DC on June 3– 4, 2010. The hearing times and location are noted below. The purpose of the hearings is to assist the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) in identifying common characteristics of victims and perpetrators of sexual victimization in juvenile facilities, and the common characteristics of juvenile facilities with the highest and lowest incidence of rape, respectively, based on an anonymous survey by the BJS of youth in a representative sample of juvenile facilities. On January 7, 2010, the BJS issued the report Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities Reported by Youth, 2008–09. The report provides a listing of juvenile facilities grouped according to the prevalence of reported sexual victimization, and formed the basis of the Panel’s decision about which facilities would be the subject of testimony. DATES: The hearing schedule is as follows: 1. Thursday, June 3, 2010, 10 a.m. to 5:45 p.m.: Bureau of Justice Statistics; Fort Bellefontaine, Missouri, Campus— facility with a low prevalence of sexual victimization; Rhode Island Training School—facility with a low prevalence of sexual victimization; and Pendleton, Indiana, Juvenile Correctional Facility— facility with a high prevalence of sexual victimization. 2. Friday, June 4, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.: Woodland Hills, Tennessee, Youth Development Center—facility with a high prevalence of sexual victimization; and Corsicana, Texas, Residential Treatment Facility—facility with a high prevalence of sexual victimization. The hearings will take place at the Office of Justice Programs Building, Main Conference Room, Third Floor, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Zubowicz, Designated Federal Official, OJP, Christopher.Zubowicz@usdoj.gov, (202) ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Panel, which was established pursuant to the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, Public Law 108–79, 117 Stat. 972 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 15601–15609 (2006)), will hold its next hearings to carry out the review functions specified at 42 U.S.C. 15603(b)(3)(A). Testimony from the hearings will assist the Panel in carrying out its statutory obligations. The witness list is subject to amendment; please refer to the Review Panel on Prison Rape Web site at http:// www.ojp.usdoj.gov/reviewpanel/ reviewpanel.htm for any updates regarding the hearing schedule. Space is limited at the hearing location. Special needs requests should be made to Christopher Zubowicz, Designated Federal Official, OJP, Christopher.Zubowicz@usdoj.gov or (202) 307–0690, at least one week before the hearings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Michael Alston, Office of Justice Programs. [FR Doc. 2010–11369 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—LiMo Foundation Notice is hereby given that, on March 12, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 8 4301 et sect. (‘‘the Act’’), LiMo Foundation (‘‘LiMo’’) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Else Limited, Ra’anana, ISRAEL; Teleca Germany GmbH, Neuremberg, GERMANY; Mobi TV, and Emeryville, CA, have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of this group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and LiMo intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On March 1, 2007, LiMo filed its original notification pursuant to Section E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 92 / Thursday, May 13, 2010 / Notices 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17583). The last notification was filed with the Department on November 10, 2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 17, 2010 (74 FR 66995). Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2010–11216 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on April 15, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (‘‘IEEE’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 28 new standards have been initiated and 20 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at http:// standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/ 02-2010.html and http:// standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/ 03-2010.html. On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). The last notification was filed with the Department on January 8, 2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 23, 2010 (75 FR 8115). Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2010–11218 Filed 5–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:56 May 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Comment Request for Information Collection for the SCSEP Data Collection System, OMB Control No. 1205–0040, Extension With Revisions AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the Employment and Training Administration is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data about the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP), expiring October 31, 2010. Changes are due to the following: (1) In December of 2009, SCSEP received additional funds authorized by the Department of Labor Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 111–117, section D) signed December 17, 2009, thus increasing the anticipated number of SCSEP participants and, therefore, increasing the overall record-keeping burden. (2) In addition, information collection forms have been modified as necessitated by the reauthorization of the SCSEP legislation (2006 Amendments to the Older Americans Act, Pub. L. 109–365) and the Jobs for Veterans Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 07–288); changes in overall burden for some forms based on actual usage statistics; and the requirement to publish changes to the Internet-based SCSEP Performance and Results QPR (SPARQ) system that go into effect on July 1, 2010. A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section of this notice. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addressee’s section below on or before July 12, 2010. PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27001 ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Alexandra Kielty, Room S–4203 Employment and Training Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number: 202–693–3730 (this is not a toll-free number). Fax: 202–693– 3587. E-mail: kielty.alexandra@dol.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Originally authorized by the Older Americans Act of 1965, the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) is funded for approximately $759 million for PY 2010 and will provide over 78,000 positions in which nearly 120,000 low-income persons aged 55 or older will be placed in community service employment. At current placement rates, this should allow about 20,000 people to be exited from the program with the ultimate goal of unsubsidized placement in PY 2010. To ensure that the Senior Community Service Employment Program is properly administered, and to implement the performance measures and sanctions authorized by the 2006 Amendments to the OAA (OAA–2006) and the Jobs for Veterans Act of 2002, it is necessary to modify the existing data collection forms. In addition, a collection of information is required under OMB Memorandum M–02–06, which has been adopted by the Department of Labor (the Department). This requirement necessitates a revision of data collection forms (listed below) and revisions to the overall data collection burden. The legal authority for the collection of additional information may be found at sections 503, 508, 513, and 515 of the OAA– 2006. II. Review Focus The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27000-27001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--LiMo Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 12, 2010, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 8 4301 et sect. (``the Act''), LiMo Foundation (``LiMo'') 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Else Limited, 
Ra'anana, ISRAEL; Teleca Germany GmbH, Neuremberg, GERMANY; Mobi TV, 
and Emeryville, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of this group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and LiMo intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 1, 2007, LiMo filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section

[[Page 27001]]

6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 2007 
(72 FR 17583).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 10, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 17, 2010 (74 FR 66995).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-11216 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M