Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone, 26650-26653 [2010-11265]
Download as PDF
26650
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
establishes temporary safety zones to
protect the public from dangers
associated with fireworks displays.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbor, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–140 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–140 Safety Zones; May
Fireworks displays within the Captain of the
Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility
(AOR)
(a) Safety Zones. The following areas
are designated safety zones:
(1) Viking Fest, Liberty Bay, WA
(i) Location. Liberty Bay, WA
extending out to a 1000 foot radius from
the launch site at 47°43′55″ N
122°39′08″ W.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(ii) Enforcement. 6:30 p.m. until 11:30
p.m. on May 14, 2010.
(2) Private Party, North of
Meadowpoint in Central Puget Sound,
WA
(i) Location. Two miles north of
Meadowpoint in Central Puget Sound,
WA extending out to 1500 foot radius
from the launch site at 47°43′42″ N
122°24′26″ W.
(i) Enforcement. 8:30 p.m. until 11
p.m. on May 22, 2010.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no vessel operator may
enter, transit, moor, or anchor within
these safety zones, except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter these safety zones
must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative by contacting either the
on-scene patrol craft on VHF Ch 13 or
Ch 16 or the Coast Guard Sector Seattle
Joint Harbor Operations Center (JHOC)
via telephone at 206–217–6002.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 12:01 a.m. May 14, 2010
through 11:59 p.m. May 23, 2010 unless
canceled sooner by the Captain of the
Port.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2010–11300 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0129]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
the regulations establishing permanent
safety zones in the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan zone during annual
events. When these safety zones are
activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, this rule would restrict
vessels from portions of water areas
during annual events that pose a hazard
to public safety. The safety zones
established by this rule are necessary to
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
falling into the water that may cause
death or serious bodily harm.
Regulatory Information
On March 23, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rule making (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zones; Annual Events
requiring safety zones in the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan zone, in the
Federal Register (75 FR 13707). We
received 0 letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
protect spectators, participants, and
vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays, boat races, and other
events.
DATES: This rule is effective June 11,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket USCG–2010–0129 and are
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420
South Lincoln Memorial Drive,
Milwaukee, WI 53207, between 8 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
BM1 Adam Kraft, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7154 or e-mail him at
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners of operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the areas designated as safety zones
during the dates and times the safety
zones are being enforced.
These safety zones will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The rule will be
Basis and Purpose
This rule amends the regulations
found in 33 CFR 165.929, Annual
Events requiring safety zones in the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan’s zone. This rule revises the
location of three safety zones to reflect
the correct enforcement areas, and add
two new reoccurring events that require
safety zones. These safety zones are
necessary to protect vessels and people
from the hazards associated with
firework displays, boat races, and other
events. Such hazards include
obstructions to the waterway that may
cause marine casualties and the
explosive danger of fireworks and debris
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received regarding
this rule.
Regulatory Analysis
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed this rule under
that Order.
The Coast Guard’s enforcement of
these safety zones will be periodic in
nature, of short duration, and designed
to minimize the impact on navigable
waters. These safety zones will only be
enforced immediately before and during
the time the events are occurring.
Furthermore, these safety zones have
been designed to allow vessels to transit
unrestricted to portions of the
waterways not affected by the safety
zones. The Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the changes and addition of these
safety zones.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26651
in effect for short periods of time and is
designed to allow traffic to pass safely
around the zone whenever possible; and
allows vessels to pass through the zone
with the permission of the Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
26652
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure
2–1, paragraph 34 (g) of the Instruction.
This rule amends permanent safety
zones established in the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan Zone to protect the
public from the hazards associated
during annual events.
A final environmental analysis check
list and a final categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.929 to revise
(a)(15)(i), (a)(52)(i), and (a)(65)(i); and to
add paragraphs (a)(82) and (a)(83) to
read as follows:
§ 165.929 Safety Zones; Annual events
requiring safety zones in the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan zone.
(a) * * *
(15) Taste of Chicago Fireworks;
Chicago IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe
Harbor and all waters of Lake Michigan
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
bounded by a line drawn from 41°53′24″
N, 087°35′59″ W; then east to 41°53′15″
N, 087°35′26″ W; then south to
41°52′49″ N, 087°35′26″ W; then
southwest to 41°52′27″ N, 087°36′37″ W;
then north to 41°53′15″ N, 087°36′33″
W; then east returning to the point of
origin. (NAD 83)
*
*
*
*
*
(52) Gary Air and Water Show; Gary,
IN.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from
41°37′42″ N, 087°16′38″ W; then east to
41°37′54″ N, 087°14′00″ W; then south
to 41°37′30″ N, 087°13′56″ W; then west
to 41°37′17″ N, 087°16′36″ W; then
north returning to the point of origin.
(NAD 83)
*
*
*
*
*
(65) Venetian Night Fireworks;
Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe
Harbor and all waters of Lake Michigan
bounded by a line drawn from 41°53′03″
N, 087°36′36″ W; then east to 41°53′03″
N, 087°36′21″ W; then south to
41°52′27″ N, 087°36′21″ W; then west to
41°52′27″ N, 087°36′37″ W; then north
returning to the point of origin. (NAD
83)
*
*
*
*
*
(82) Cochrane Cup; Blue Island, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of the Calumet
Sag Channel from the South Halstead
Street Bridge at 41°39′27″ N, 087°38′29″
W; to the Crawford Avenue Bridge at
41°39′05″ N, 087°43′08″ W; and the
Little Calumet River from the Ashland
Avenue Bridge at 41°39′7″ N, 087°39′38″
W; to the junction of the Calumet Sag
Channel at 41°39′23″ N, 087°39′ W
(NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The
first Saturday of May; 6:30 a.m. to 5
p.m.
(83) World War II Beach Invasion Reenactment; St. Joseph, MI.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake
Michigan in the vicinity of Tiscornia
Park in St. Joseph, MI beginning at
42°06.55 N, 086°29.23 W; then west/
northwest along the north breakwater to
42°06.59 N, 086°29.41 W; the northwest
100 yards to 42°07.01 N, 086°29.44 W;
then northeast 2,243 yards to 42°07.50
N, 086°28.43 W; the southeast to the
shoreline at 42°07.39 N, 086°28.27 W;
then southwest along the shoreline to
the point of origin (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The
third Saturday of June; 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: April 28, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010–11265 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0344; FRL–9112–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Reformulated Gasoline and Diesel
Fuels; California
I. Summary of Proposed Actions
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule approves state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of California on
June 15, 2004 and February 3, 2009,
relating to reformulated gasoline (RFG)
and diesel fuel sold or supplied as
motor vehicle fuels in California. The
revisions relating to RFG include
California Phase 3 RFG (CaRFG3)
regulations, correction of errors and
streamlined requirements for
compliance with and enforcement of the
CaRFG3 standards, and an update to the
State’s predictive model to mitigate
permeation emissions associated with
the use of ethanol as a fuel additive. The
revisions relating to diesel fuel include
test methods for determining the
aromatic hydrocarbon content in diesel
fuel and reductions in the maximum
allowable sulfur content for motor
vehicle diesel fuel. The effect of today’s
action is to make these revisions
federally enforceable as part of the
California SIP.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0344. The index to the
docket for this action is available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
On July 10, 2009 (74 FR 33196), EPA
proposed to approve revisions to the
California regulations for reformulated
gasoline (RFG) sold or supplied in
California, as submitted on June 15,
2004 and February 3, 2009, and
revisions to the regulations for diesel
fuel sold or supplied in California, as
submitted on February 3, 2009, as
revisions to the California SIP. On July
21, 2009 (74 FR 35838), EPA issued a
correction to the proposed approval and
on August 11, 2009 (74 FR 40123), EPA
extended the comment period on the
proposed approval to August 31, 2009.
For a detailed discussion of the rule
revisions that California submitted,
please refer to EPA’s proposed rule and
Technical Support Document which can
be found in the docket for this
rulemaking.
II. EPA’s Response to Comments
We received one comment letter on
August 31, 2009 from the Center on
Race, Poverty & the Environment (CRPE
or ‘‘the commenter’’) on behalf of the
Association of Irritated Residents,
´
´
Comite West Goshen, Comite Unido de
´
Plainview, Comite Residentes
Organizados al Servicio del Ambiente,
Committee for a Better Arvin, La Nueva
Esperanza deAlpaugh, El Quinto Sol de
America, South Shafter Project
Committee, Shafter Chapter League of
United Latin American Citizens, United
for a Change in Tooleville, and La Voz
de Tonyville.
We have summarized the comments
and provided responses below.
Comment 1: CRPE stated that EPA
must determine that CaRFG3 is
enforceable before approving the SIP
revision. Specifically, the commenter
asserted that EPA is inappropriately
relying on a federal RFG enforcement
exemption granted in 2005 to support
its conclusion that the CaRFG3
amendments to the SIP satisfy the
requirements of CAA section 110(a).
The commenter summarized portions
of the rationale EPA provided in our
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26653
proposed approval (74 FR 33198), and
stated that ‘‘EPA must evaluate the final
rule to determine whether the rule is
enforceable under § 110(a), not whether
the rule is equivalent in practice to
federal requirements.’’ The commenter
asserted that EPA has neither ‘‘made the
requisite finding that the provisions are
enforceable,’’ nor ‘‘made the case that
equivalence in practice to federal
requirements constitutes enforceability
for the purposes of § 110(a).’’
Response 1: Section 110(a)(2)(A) of
the CAA requires that each SIP include
‘‘enforceable emission limitations and
other control measures, means, or
techniques * * * as may be necessary
or appropriate to meet the applicable
requirements of this chapter.’’ See also
CAA section 172(c)(6) (requiring
enforceable measures in nonattainment
area plans). EPA has stated in
interpretive guidance that to be
enforceable in practice, a measure must
‘‘specify clear, unambiguous, and
measurable requirements’’ and must
include a legal means to ensure that
sources are in compliance.1 For
example, an enforceable SIP regulation
must clearly spell out the requirements,
the regulated sources or activities, the
recordkeeping and monitoring
requirements, and test procedures to
determine whether sources are in
compliance.2 We continue to believe
that the revisions to the California RFG
regulations that we are approving today
satisfy these enforceability requirements
of CAA section 110(a).
First, as the commenter notes, in 2005
EPA exempted refiners, blenders and
importers of CaRFG3 sold for use within
California from certain enforcement
provisions in the Federal RFG
regulations found at 40 CFR 80.81
(CaRFG3 enforcement exemption).3 EPA
granted this enforcement exemption
following a determination that the
CaRFG3 regulations and associated
enforcement mechanisms were
sufficient to ensure that producers of
California gasoline would in fact meet
the CaRFG3 standards, which in turn,
would ensure compliance with the
Federal Phase II RFG standards.4 EPA’s
1 ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General Preamble
for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498 at 13568
(April 16, 1992) (General Preamble).
2 Id. at 13502.
3 70 FR 75914 (December 21, 2005).
4 EPA made three determinations to support the
enforcement exemption: (1) That emission
reductions from CaRFG3 would be equal to or
greater than the emission reductions from Federal
Phase II RFG standards; (2) that the content
standard for benzene in CaRFG3 would be
equivalent in practice to the Federal Phase II RFG
standard and that the oxygen content standard of
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
Continued
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26650-26653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11265]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0129]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending the regulations establishing
permanent safety zones in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone
during annual events. When these safety zones are activated, and thus
subject to enforcement, this rule would restrict vessels from portions
of water areas during annual events that pose a hazard to public
safety. The safety zones established by this rule are necessary to
[[Page 26651]]
protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays, boat races, and other events.
DATES: This rule is effective June 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0129 and are available online at https://www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for inspection or
copying at two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420 South Lincoln Memorial Drive,
Milwaukee, WI 53207, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call BM1 Adam Kraft, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747-7154 or e-mail him at
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On March 23, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rule making
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zones; Annual Events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone, in the Federal Register (75
FR 13707). We received 0 letters commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Basis and Purpose
This rule amends the regulations found in 33 CFR 165.929, Annual
Events requiring safety zones in the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan's zone. This rule revises the location of three safety zones
to reflect the correct enforcement areas, and add two new reoccurring
events that require safety zones. These safety zones are necessary to
protect vessels and people from the hazards associated with firework
displays, boat races, and other events. Such hazards include
obstructions to the waterway that may cause marine casualties and the
explosive danger of fireworks and debris falling into the water that
may cause death or serious bodily harm.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received regarding this rule.
Regulatory Analysis
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed this rule under that Order.
The Coast Guard's enforcement of these safety zones will be
periodic in nature, of short duration, and designed to minimize the
impact on navigable waters. These safety zones will only be enforced
immediately before and during the time the events are occurring.
Furthermore, these safety zones have been designed to allow vessels to
transit unrestricted to portions of the waterways not affected by the
safety zones. The Coast Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to
mariners from the changes and addition of these safety zones.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners of operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the areas designated as safety zones during the
dates and times the safety zones are being enforced.
These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. The
rule will be in effect for short periods of time and is designed to
allow traffic to pass safely around the zone whenever possible; and
allows vessels to pass through the zone with the permission of the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
[[Page 26652]]
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Directive 023-01, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 34 (g) of
the Instruction. This rule amends permanent safety zones established in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone to protect the public from
the hazards associated during annual events.
A final environmental analysis check list and a final categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.929 to revise (a)(15)(i), (a)(52)(i), and
(a)(65)(i); and to add paragraphs (a)(82) and (a)(83) to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.929 Safety Zones; Annual events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone.
(a) * * *
(15) Taste of Chicago Fireworks; Chicago IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe Harbor and all waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from 41[deg]53'24'' N, 087[deg]35'59''
W; then east to 41[deg]53'15'' N, 087[deg]35'26'' W; then south to
41[deg]52'49'' N, 087[deg]35'26'' W; then southwest to 41[deg]52'27''
N, 087[deg]36'37'' W; then north to 41[deg]53'15'' N, 087[deg]36'33''
W; then east returning to the point of origin. (NAD 83)
* * * * *
(52) Gary Air and Water Show; Gary, IN.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan bounded by a line drawn
from 41[deg]37'42'' N, 087[deg]16'38'' W; then east to 41[deg]37'54''
N, 087[deg]14'00'' W; then south to 41[deg]37'30'' N, 087[deg]13'56''
W; then west to 41[deg]37'17'' N, 087[deg]16'36'' W; then north
returning to the point of origin. (NAD 83)
* * * * *
(65) Venetian Night Fireworks; Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe Harbor and all waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from 41[deg]53'03'' N, 087[deg]36'36''
W; then east to 41[deg]53'03'' N, 087[deg]36'21'' W; then south to
41[deg]52'27'' N, 087[deg]36'21'' W; then west to 41[deg]52'27'' N,
087[deg]36'37'' W; then north returning to the point of origin. (NAD
83)
* * * * *
(82) Cochrane Cup; Blue Island, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of the Calumet Sag Channel from the South
Halstead Street Bridge at 41[deg]39'27'' N, 087[deg]38'29'' W; to the
Crawford Avenue Bridge at 41[deg]39'05'' N, 087[deg]43'08'' W; and the
Little Calumet River from the Ashland Avenue Bridge at 41[deg]39'7'' N,
087[deg]39'38'' W; to the junction of the Calumet Sag Channel at
41[deg]39'23'' N, 087[deg]39' W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The first Saturday of May; 6:30
a.m. to 5 p.m.
(83) World War II Beach Invasion Re-enactment; St. Joseph, MI.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan in the vicinity of
Tiscornia Park in St. Joseph, MI beginning at 42[deg]06.55 N,
086[deg]29.23 W; then west/northwest along the north breakwater to
42[deg]06.59 N, 086[deg]29.41 W; the northwest 100 yards to
42[deg]07.01 N, 086[deg]29.44 W; then northeast 2,243 yards to
42[deg]07.50 N, 086[deg]28.43 W; the southeast to the shoreline at
42[deg]07.39 N, 086[deg]28.27 W; then southwest along the shoreline to
the point of origin (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The third Saturday of June; 8 a.m.
to 2 p.m.
* * * * *
[[Page 26653]]
Dated: April 28, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010-11265 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P