Adequacy Status of the Chicago, Illinois Area Submitted 8-Hour Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance Plans for Transportation Conformity Purposes, 26225-26226 [2010-11140]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Notices
(713) 267–4759 (telephone) or (713)
267–4755 (fax), jdowns@nisource.com,
Cynthia Donaldson, Director, Regulatory
& Government Affairs, Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC, 5151 San Felipe,
Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77056, or by
calling (713) 267–4763 (telephone) or
(713) 331–7456 (fax),
cdonaldson@nisource.com, Victoria J.
Hamilton, Certificate Lead, Columbia
Gas Transmission, LLC, P.O. Box 1273,
Charleston, West Virginia 25325–1273,
or by calling (304) 357–2297 (telephone)
or (304) 357–3206 (fax),
vhamilton@nisource.com, or to Frederic
J. George, Senior Counsel, Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC, P.O. Box 1273,
Charleston, West Virginia 25325–1273,
or by calling (304) 357–2359 (telephone)
or (304) 357–3206 (fax),
fgeorge@nisource.com.
Any person or the Commission’s Staff
may, within 60 days after the issuance
of the instant notice by the Commission,
file pursuant to Rule 214 of the
Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice
of intervention and, pursuant to section
157.205 of the Commission’s
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR
157.205) a protest to the request. If no
protest is filed within the time allowed
therefore, the proposed activity shall be
deemed to be authorized effective the
day after the time allowed for protest. If
a protest is filed and not withdrawn
within 30 days after the time allowed
for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–11104 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:22 May 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD10–11–000]
Frequency Regulation Compensation
in the Organized Wholesale Power
Markets; Notice of Technical
Conference
April 27, 2010.
Take notice that Commission staff
will hold a technical conference to elicit
input on issues pertaining to Frequency
Regulation Compensation in the ISO/
RTO Markets. The technical conference
will take place on May 26, 2010, from
9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Eastern Time. The
conference will be held in the
Commission Meeting Room at the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. All interested persons are invited
to participate in the conference.
Those interested in speaking at the
conferences should notify the
Commission by May 3, 2010 by
completing an online form describing
the topics that they will address:
https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/
registration/markets-05-26-speakerform.asp. Due to time constraints, we
may not be able to accommodate all
those interested in speaking. A detailed
agenda, including panel speakers, will
be published at a later date.
The technical conference will be
transcribed. Transcripts of the
conferences will be immediately
available for a fee from Ace-Federal
Reporters, Inc. (202–347–3700 or 1–
800–336–6646). The transcripts will be
available for free on the Commission’s
eLibrary system and on the Calendar of
Events approximately one week after the
conference.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on
the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Commission conferences are
accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For
accessibility accommodations, please
send an e-mail to accessibility@ferc.gov
or call toll free (866) 208–3372 (voice)
or (202) 208–1659 (TTY), or send a FAX
to (202) 208–2106 with the required
accommodations.
For further information about the
conference, please contact: Tatyana
Kramskaya (Technical Information),
Office of Energy Policy and Innovation,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26225
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, (202) 502–6262,
Tatyana.Kramskaya@ferc.gov; Eric
Winterbauer (Legal Information), Office
of the General Counsel—Energy
Markets, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–8329,
Eric.Winterbauer@ferc.gov.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–11110 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0666; FRL–9149–6]
Adequacy Status of the Chicago,
Illinois Area Submitted 8–Hour Ozone
Redesignation and Maintenance Plans
for Transportation Conformity
Purposes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions
budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) in the Chicago, Illinois
ozone nonattainment area are adequate
for use in transportation conformity
determinations. Illinois submitted a
redesignation request and maintenance
plan for the Illinois portion of the
Chicago ozone nonattainment area on
July 23, 2009. As a result of our finding,
this area must use the MVEBs from the
submitted ozone maintenance plan for
future transportation conformity
determinations.
DATES:
This finding is effective May 26,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Leslie, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section
(AR–18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, United States
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353–6680,
leslie.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Background
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. On April 22, 2010, EPA
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
26226
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Notices
Region 5 sent a letter to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
stating that the 2009 and 2020 MVEBs
for the Chicago, Illinois 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area are adequate.
Receipt of these MVEBs was announced
on EPA’s transportation conformity Web
site, and no comments were submitted.
The finding is available at EPA’s
conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate 2009 and 2020 MVEBs,
in tons per day (tpd), for VOCs and NOX
for the Chicago, Illinois area are as
follows:
NOX
(tpd)
VOCs
(tpd)
2009 ..................................
2020 ..................................
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Chicago area
284.65
88.17
133.78
73.68
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act.
EPA’s conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, programs, and
projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans and establishes
the criteria and procedures for
determining whether or not they do
conform. Conformity to a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes are
outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We
have described our process for
determining the adequacy of submitted
SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004,
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038, and
we used the information in these
resources while making our adequacy
determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and it also should
not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval of the SIP. Even if we find a
budget adequate, the SIP could later be
disapproved.
The finding and the response to
comments are available at EPA’s
transportation conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
Dated: April 29, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010–11140 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:22 May 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0761; FRL–9149–8]
Executive Order 13508 Chesapeake
Bay Protection and Restoration
Section 203 Final Coordinated
Implementation Strategy
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of a final strategy for
restoration and protection of the
Chesapeake Bay that was prepared
pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 13508
of May 12, 2009, Chesapeake Bay
Protection and Restoration. The purpose
of this strategy is to describe federal
actions to protect and restore the health,
heritage, natural resources, and social
and economic value of the nation’s
largest estuarine ecosystem and the
natural sustainability of its watershed.
The EO requires that the final strategy
be published within one year of the date
of the EO.
DATES: Effective May 12, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Travis Loop, USEPA, Region 3,
Chesapeake Bay Program Office,
Annapolis City Marina, 410 Severn
Avenue, Suite 109 (3CB10), Annapolis,
MD 21403; telephone number: (410)
267–5758; fax number: (410) 267–5777;
e-mail: loop.travis@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Executive Order 13508, Chesapeake
Bay Protection and Restoration, dated
May 12, 2009 (74 FR 23099, May 15,
2009), established a Federal Leadership
Committee, chaired by EPA, and
including senior representatives from
the departments of Agriculture,
Commerce, Defense, Homeland
Security, Interior and Transportation.
EO 13508 directed these agencies to
prepare and publish a strategy for
coordinated implementation of existing
programs and projects to guide efforts to
protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay.
The draft strategy was released for
public comment on November 9, 2009
(74 FR 57675, November 9, 2009). This
final strategy incorporates revisions
resulting from public comments and
ongoing consideration by the federal
agencies.
Why was this document prepared?
Executive Order 13508, Chesapeake
Bay Protection and Restoration, dated
May 12, 2009 (74 FR 23099, May 15,
2009), required a Federal Leadership
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Committee composed of seven Federal
agencies to (1) prepare and publish a set
of reports on key challenges to
protecting and restoring the Chesapeake
Bay, (2) prepare and publish a draft
strategy for coordinated implementation
of existing programs and projects to
guide efforts to protect and restore the
Chesapeake Bay within 180 days of the
date of the EO, and (3) prepare and
publish a final strategy for coordinated
implementation of existing programs
and projects to guide efforts to protect
and restore the Chesapeake Bay within
one year of the date of the EO.
The federal agency draft reports
required by EO 13508 Sections 202(a)
through (g) were released to the public
for review on September 10, 2009. The
draft reports were reviewed by the
Federal Leadership Committee, in
consultation with relevant state
agencies. The reports were revised to
reflect consideration of the comments
received during state consultation and
preliminary public input. The revised
final reports were released on November
24, 2009.
The draft strategy for coordinated
implementation of existing programs
and projects to guide efforts to protect
and restore the Chesapeake Bay required
by EO 13508 Section 203 was released
for public comment on November 9,
2009 (74 FR 57675, November 9, 2009).
The Federal Leadership Committee
established a docket for public
comments (EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0761).
Several hundred individual comments
were received, along with about 45,000
comments provided through massmailing campaigns. The Federal
Leadership Committee has prepared a
summary of its responses to public
comments on the draft strategy. The
summary is available at https://
executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net.
The final strategy for restoration and
protection of the Chesapeake Bay
incorporates revisions resulting from
public comments and ongoing
consideration by the federal agencies.
This final strategy meets the EO
requirement to publish the final strategy
within one year of the EO.
How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
Docket: EPA has established a docket
for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0761. The final EO
13508 Section 203 strategy document is
available in the docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, as well as at
https://
executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net.
Assistance and tips for accessing the
docket can be found at https://
executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net. For
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26225-26226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11140]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0666; FRL-9149-6]
Adequacy Status of the Chicago, Illinois Area Submitted 8-Hour
Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance Plans for Transportation Conformity
Purposes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in the
Chicago, Illinois ozone nonattainment area are adequate for use in
transportation conformity determinations. Illinois submitted a
redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Illinois portion of
the Chicago ozone nonattainment area on July 23, 2009. As a result of
our finding, this area must use the MVEBs from the submitted ozone
maintenance plan for future transportation conformity determinations.
DATES: This finding is effective May 26, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Leslie, Environmental Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section
(AR-18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, United
States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-6680,
leslie.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever ``we'', ``us'' or ``our'' is
used, we mean EPA.
Background
Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. On April 22, 2010, EPA
[[Page 26226]]
Region 5 sent a letter to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
stating that the 2009 and 2020 MVEBs for the Chicago, Illinois 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area are adequate. Receipt of these MVEBs was
announced on EPA's transportation conformity Web site, and no comments
were submitted. The finding is available at EPA's conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate 2009 and 2020 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for VOCs
and NOX for the Chicago, Illinois area are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX VOCs
Chicago area (tpd) (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009.................................................. 284.65 133.78
2020.................................................. 88.17 73.68
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for
determining whether or not they do conform. Conformity to a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's MVEBs are
adequate for transportation conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for determining the
adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, preamble
starting at 69 FR 40038, and we used the information in these resources
while making our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy
review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also should
not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
The finding and the response to comments are available at EPA's
transportation conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: April 29, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010-11140 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P