Safety Zone; Reedville July 4th Celebration, Cockrell's Creek, Reedville, VA, 26157-26160 [2010-11087]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary
safety zone around a fireworks display
and is therefore expected to be
categorically excluded, under section
2.B.2. Figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g), of the
Instruction. The fireworks are launched
from land and the safety zone is
intended to keep mariners away from
any fall out that may enter the water. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
26157
vicinity of Ocean View Beach Park,
Norfolk, VA.
(b) Definition. For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced on July 4,
2010, with a rain date of July 5, 2010,
from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
Dated: 24 April, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2010–11085 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Coast Guard
2. Add § 165.T05–0294 to read as
follows:
RIN 1625–AA00
§ 165.T05–0294 Safety Zone; Shore Thing
& Independence Day Fireworks,
Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA.
Safety Zone; Reedville July 4th
Celebration, Cockrell’s Creek,
Reedville, VA
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: Specified waters of the
Chesapeake Bay located within a 210
foot radius of the fireworks display at
approximate position 36°57′17″ N/
076°15′00″ W (NAD 1983) in the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0293]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Cockrell’s Creek in the vicinity of
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
26158
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Reedville, VA in support of the
Reedville July 4th Celebration event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic movement on Cockrell’s Creek to
protect mariners from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0293 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy,
Chief Waterways Management Division,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone (757) 668–5580, e-mail
Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0293),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0293’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0293’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact Lieutenant
Tiffany Duffy, Chief Waterways
Management Division, Sector Hampton
Roads at the telephone number or e-mail
address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Basis and Purpose
On July 2, 2010 Greater Reedville
Association will sponsor a fireworks
display on Cockrell’s Creek. The
proposed safety zone is intended to
protect the public from any fall out that
may enter the water. Due to the need to
protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with the fireworks
display, access to Cockrell’s Creek
within 420 feet of the fireworks display
will be temporarily restricted.
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a safety zone on specified
waters of Cockrell’s Creek in the vicinity
of Reedville, Virginia. This safety zone
will encompass all navigable waters
within 420 feet of the fireworks display
located at position 37°49′54″ N/
076°16′44″ W (NAD 1983). This
proposed safety zone will be established
in the interest of public safety during
the Reedville July 4th Celebration event
and will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10
p.m. on July 2, 2010. Access to the
safety zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his
Representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
The Coast Guard expects the
temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register because delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
public interest due to the need to
protect the public from the dangers
associated with the fireworks display.
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because: (i) The safety zone
will be in effect for a limited duration;
(ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii)
the Coast Guard will make notifications
via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the zone will only be in
place for a limited duration and
maritime advisories will be issued
allowing the mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly. However, this rule
may affect the following entities, some
of which may be small entities: the
owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in that
portion of Cockrell’s Creek from 8 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on July 2, 2010.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 May 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Lieutenant
Tiffany Duffy, Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Hampton
Roads at (757) 668–5580. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26159
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
26160
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a safety zone
around a fireworks display. The
fireworks are launched from land and
the safety zone is intended to keep
mariners away from any fall out that
may enter the water. Therefore this rule
is expected to be categorically excluded,
under section 2.B.2. Figure 2–1,
paragraph 34(g), of the Instruction.
A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0293 to read as
follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–11087 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900–AN42
Drug and Drug-Related Supply
Promotion by Pharmaceutical
Company Sales Representatives at VA
Facilities
ACTION:
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: specified waters of
Cockrell’s Creek located within a 420
foot radius of the fireworks display at
approximate position 37°49′54″ N/
076°16′44″ W (NAD 1983) in the
vicinity of Reedville, VA.
(b) Definition. For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
14:19 May 10, 2010
Dated: April 24, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads.
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule; republication.
AGENCY:
§ 165.T05–0293 Safety Zone; Reedville
July 4th Celebration, Cockrell’s Creek,
Reedville, VA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced on July 2,
2010 from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m.
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is republishing the
proposed rule document that was
published on May 5, 2010, in the
Federal Register to provide the address
that the public needs to submit their
comments. In that document, we
inadvertently omitted the ADDRESSES
section for public comments. As a
convenience to the public, instead of
merely publishing a correction
document, we are republishing the
entire proposed rule with the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section and a new 60-day
comment period. These are the only two
changes made to the proposed rule.
The purposes of the proposed rule are
to reduce or eliminate any potential for
disruption in the patient care
environment, manage activities and
promotions at VA facilities, and provide
sales representatives with a consistent
standard of permissible business
practice at VA facilities. It would also
facilitate mutually beneficial
relationships between VA and such
sales representatives.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before July 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand
delivery to the Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW, Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AN42—Drug and Drug-Related Supply
Promotion by Pharmaceutical Company
Sales.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 (this is not a tollfree number) for an appointment. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louis E. Cobuzzi, PBM Services (119),
Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420; (202) 461–7362. (This is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5,
2010, VA published this proposed rule
in the Federal Register at 75 FR 24510,
with an error. We inadvertently omitted
the ADDRESSES section for public
comments. We are republishing the
proposed rule with the address
information where the public can
submit their comments and with a new
60-day comment period.
Under 38 U.S.C. 303, the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs is responsible for ‘‘the
proper execution and administration of
all laws administered by the Department
and for the control, direction, and
management of the Department.’’ The
Secretary has authority to prescribe all
rules necessary to carry out the laws
administered by the Department, such
as section 303 regarding control and
management of the Department. See 38
ADDRESSES
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26157-26160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11087]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0293]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Reedville July 4th Celebration, Cockrell's Creek,
Reedville, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on Cockrell's Creek in the vicinity of
[[Page 26158]]
Reedville, VA in support of the Reedville July 4th Celebration event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic movement on
Cockrell's Creek to protect mariners from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0293 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy, Chief Waterways Management
Division, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone (757) 668-5580,
e-mail Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0293), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0293'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0293'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact Lieutenant Tiffany Duffy, Chief Waterways Management Division,
Sector Hampton Roads at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Basis and Purpose
On July 2, 2010 Greater Reedville Association will sponsor a
fireworks display on Cockrell's Creek. The proposed safety zone is
intended to protect the public from any fall out that may enter the
water. Due to the need to protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with the fireworks display, access to Cockrell's
Creek within 420 feet of the fireworks display will be temporarily
restricted.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone on specified
waters of Cockrell's Creek in the vicinity of Reedville, Virginia. This
safety zone will encompass all navigable waters within 420 feet of the
fireworks display located at position 37[deg]49'54'' N/076[deg]16'44''
W (NAD 1983). This proposed safety zone will be established in the
interest of public safety during the Reedville July 4th Celebration
event and will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 2, 2010.
Access to the safety zone will be restricted during the specified date
and times. Except for participants and vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his Representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
The Coast Guard expects the temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because
delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public interest
due to the need to protect the public from the dangers associated with
the fireworks display.
[[Page 26159]]
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will be in effect
for a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) the
Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the zone will only be in place for a
limited duration and maritime advisories will be issued allowing the
mariners to adjust their plans accordingly. However, this rule may
affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the
owners and operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in that
portion of Cockrell's Creek from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 2, 2010.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lieutenant Tiffany Duffy, Chief,
Waterways Management Division, Sector Hampton Roads at (757) 668-5580.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question
or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 26160]]
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
establishing a safety zone around a fireworks display. The fireworks
are launched from land and the safety zone is intended to keep mariners
away from any fall out that may enter the water. Therefore this rule is
expected to be categorically excluded, under section 2.B.2. Figure 2-1,
paragraph 34(g), of the Instruction.
A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0293 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0293 Safety Zone; Reedville July 4th Celebration,
Cockrell's Creek, Reedville, VA.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: specified
waters of Cockrell's Creek located within a 420 foot radius of the
fireworks display at approximate position 37[deg]49'54'' N/
076[deg]16'44'' W (NAD 1983) in the vicinity of Reedville, VA.
(b) Definition. For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone Number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced on July 2,
2010 from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m.
Dated: April 24, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2010-11087 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P