Operations Specifications, 25127-25137 [2010-10890]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
inner chord along the length of the repair and
around the fastener heads in accordance with
Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1254,
Revision 1, dated July 9, 2009.
Exceptions to Service Information
(j) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1254, Revision 1, dated July 9, 2009,
specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions and repair: Before further flight,
repair the cracking using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (m) of this AD.
(k) Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1254, Revision 1, dated July 9, 2009,
specifies to submit information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Terminating Action
(l) Doing the repair specified in Part 4 of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1254,
Revision 1, dated July 9, 2009, terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD for the repaired
frame only.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6447; fax (425)
917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9–ANM–
Seattle-ACO–AMOC–Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28,
2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–10902 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 110, 119, 121, 129, and
135
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0140; Notice No. 10–
07]
RIN 2120–AJ45
Operations Specifications
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
clarify and standardize the rules for
applications by foreign air carriers and
foreign persons for operations
specifications and establish new
standards for amendment, suspension or
termination of those operations
specifications. The proposed rule would
also apply to foreign persons operating
U.S.-registered aircraft in common
carriage solely outside the United
States. This action is necessary to
update the process for issuing
operations specifications, and it will
establish a regulatory basis for current
practices, such as amending,
terminating or suspending operations
specifications.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before August 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by Docket Number FAA–
2009–0140 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
For more information on the rulemaking
process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Privacy: We will post all comments
we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide.
Using the search function of our docket
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25127
Web site, anyone can find and read the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the
comment for an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review
DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you
may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: To read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
and follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket, or, go to the
Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darcy D. Reed, International Programs
and Policy Division, AFS–50, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; email: darcy.d.reed@faa.gov; Telephone:
202–385–8078. For legal questions
concerning this proposed rule contact
Lorna John, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Regulations Division, AGC–200, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; e-mail:
Lorna.John@faa.gov; telephone: 202–
267–3921.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Additional Information section of this
preamble, you will find a discussion of
how you can comment on this proposal
and how the agency will handle your
comments. Included in this discussion
is related information about the docket,
privacy, and handling proprietary or
confidential business information.
There is also a discussion on how you
can get a copy of related rulemaking
documents.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section
106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority.
This proposed rule is issued under
the authority described in Title 49 of the
United States Code, Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart III, Section 44701(a)(5). Under
that section, the Administrator is
charged with promoting safe flight of
civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations and minimum
standards for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
25128
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
necessary to ensure safety in air
commerce. Clarifying and standardizing
the rules for application, amendment,
suspension, or termination of operations
specifications issued to foreign air
carriers operating in the United States
and to foreign air carriers or foreign
persons conducting operations of U.S.registered aircraft solely outside the
United States enhances the FAA’s
oversight of U.S.-registered aircraft and
those foreign air carriers’ operations
within the United States.
I. Background
Title 49 of the United States Code
contains the basic authority for
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce and for regulating the
global operations of U.S.-registered
aircraft. For foreign air carriers serving
the United States, the basic operating
requirements are found in 14 CFR parts
91 and 129. The standards set forth in
Annexes 1, 6, and 8 to the Convention
on International Civil Aviation (the
Chicago Convention), as implemented
by the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO), also apply to the
international operations of air carriers.
The applicable ICAO Annexes are:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Annex 1—Personnel Licensing,
Annex 6—Part I, Operation of Aircraft—
International Commercial Air Transport—
Aeroplanes,
Annex 6—Part III, Operation of Aircraft—
International Operations—Helicopters, and
Annex 8—Airworthiness of Aircraft.
ICAO Annexes contain the
international standards for safety,
regulation, and efficiency of air
navigation. These international
standards define the minimum level of
safety necessary for the recognition by
Contracting States to the Chicago
Convention of certificates of
airworthiness, certificates of
competency and licenses that allow for
the flight of aircraft of other States into
or over their territories. They also
provide for the protection of other
aircraft, third parties, and property. As
with all Contracting States to the
Chicago Convention, the United States
is obligated to recognize only those
certificates of airworthiness, certificates
of competency, and licenses issued or
rendered valid by another Contracting
State. The requirements under which
these certificates or licenses are issued
or rendered valid by the Contracting
State must be equal to or above the
minimum standards established by the
Chicago Convention.
The FAA’s authority over a foreign air
carrier using foreign-registered aircraft
is limited to overseeing compliance
with all the applicable provisions of the
Chicago Convention and its Annexes,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
and U.S. regulations for the flights
conducted by the foreign air carrier into
the United States. Adherence to these
standards assures the foreign air
carrier’s ability to navigate and
communicate safely within the U.S.
National Airspace System (NAS) while
protecting individuals and property on
the ground.
To fulfill its oversight responsibilities,
the FAA issues operations specifications
to foreign air carriers and foreign
persons. These operations specifications
ensure a common understanding
between the foreign air carrier or foreign
person and the FAA. The FAA-issued
operations specifications describe the
scope of a foreign air carrier’s operations
into the United States, including any
applicable authorizations and
limitations, and a foreign person’s
maintenance responsibility for U.S.registered aircraft operated in common
carriage solely outside the United
States. The FAA-issued operations
specifications do not, however, affect or
interfere with the responsibilities of the
foreign Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)
that issued an air operator certificate to
the foreign air carrier. The foreign CAA
maintains primary responsibility for the
certification of the foreign air carrier
and the continuing oversight of the air
carrier or foreign person’s operations in
accordance with applicable ICAO
standards.
II. Discussion of the Proposal
14 CFR part 129 prescribes the rules
governing foreign air carrier operations
within the United States and the
operations of U.S.-registered aircraft
solely outside the United States in
common carriage. In order to meet
international standards and the
changing aviation environment, it is
necessary to revise part 129. For
example, the processes for application
and amendment of operations
specifications for U.S. operators subject
to 14 CFR parts 121, 125, and 135 are
described in part 119. However, there
are no explicit provisions governing the
application for, or amendment of,
operations specifications issued to
foreign air carriers or foreign persons in
part 129, nor is there a provision in part
129 for the suspension or termination of
operations specifications. Therefore, the
FAA proposes to clarify the process for
application, amendment, suspension,
and termination of operations
specifications issued to foreign air
carriers and foreign persons.
This proposal would add three new
sections to subpart A: § 129.5,
Operations Specifications; § 129.7,
Application, issuance, or denial of
operations specifications; and § 129.9,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Contents of operations specifications.
This proposed rule would also amend
the existing § 129.11 to specifically
address amendment, suspension and
termination of operations specifications.
Section 129.5 would define which
foreign air carriers or foreign persons
must hold FAA operations
specifications and the effective period of
such operations specifications. Current
regulations require only foreign air
carriers conducting operations into the
United States to conduct their
operations in accordance with
operations specifications issued by the
Administrator. Section 129.5 of the
proposed rule would extend this
requirement to a foreign air carrier or
foreign person operating a U.S.registered aircraft solely outside the
United States in common carriage.
Additionally, the FAA proposes to
include a provision in § 129.5 requiring
the foreign air carrier to keep each of its
employees, and other persons used in
its operations, informed of the
provisions of its FAA-issued operations
specifications that apply to that
employee’s or person’s duties and
responsibilities.
In § 129.7, the FAA proposes to
include provisions governing the
application, issuance, or denial of
operations specifications. The
application process for foreign air
carriers is presently defined in
§ 129.11(b) and Appendix A of part 129.
It contains outdated requirements that
are no longer relevant to the FAA’s
safety oversight needs.1 Also, unlike the
process for domestic air carrier
applicants, which allows more
cooperation between the applicant and
the FAA, current Appendix A of part
129 requires a foreign applicant to
provide very specific information in a
particular format. Requiring this degree
of detail in form and content does not
advance aviation safety and may limit
the flexibility necessary to ensure the
safety of the flying public. The FAA
proposes to remove Appendix A and
place general requirements in the new
§ 129.7(a). However, proposed § 129.7(b)
would retain the current requirement in
Appendix A, section VIII.B for the
applicant to provide a written
certification that the statements in the
application are true. Using this
approach allows the operations
specification process to be easily revised
1 An example of an outdated requirement is a
listing of the type and class of certificate held by
each flight crewmember employed in the proposed
operation within the United States. This
requirement is duplicative. Contracting states to the
Chicago Convention are obligated to recognize as
valid certificates and licenses issued by other
contracting states.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
and updated to meet the changing
aviation environment and FAA safety
oversight needs.
Upon issuance of the final rule, the
FAA will revise the inspector handbook
guidance with an updated application
procedure for foreign applicants to
obtain FAA-issued foreign operations
specifications. The procedure would
provide for greater interaction between
the foreign applicant and the FAA and
ensure that a foreign applicant’s
programs, systems, and intended
methods of compliance are thoroughly
reviewed and evaluated in light of U.S.
requirements.
The proposed application procedure
is as follows:
Preapplication. The foreign applicant
makes an inquiry to the FAA regarding
the process for obtaining operations
specifications. The FAA will provide
the foreign applicant with an
application package and information on
the operations specifications application
process.
Formal Application. The responsible
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO)
will conduct an in-depth review of the
foreign air carrier’s formal application
for operations specifications. Also, the
responsible office will hold a formal
application meeting to discuss the
feasibility of the project and obtain any
additional information or request
corrections needed for its review.
Documentation. The responsible
FSDO will review the applicant’s
documents in support of its request for
issuance of mandatory and optional
operations specifications.
Verification. The responsible FSDO
will verify the foreign air carrier
applicant’s DOT economic authority
and TSA security program approval (if
required).
Issuance. The FAA will assign an
operations specification designator and
number, and the part 129 operations
specifications will be generated and
issued to the applicant for acceptance
and signature. After issuance, the
responsible FSDO will implement a
comprehensive ongoing surveillance
program.
Using this procedure would allow the
FAA to verify that the foreign
applicant’s programs, systems, and
intended methods of compliance have
been approved or accepted by the State
of the Operator. The information
obtained during the application process
would also provide the FAA with a
basis to determine whether the
applicant would be able to comply with
all applicable FAA requirements while
operating in the NAS.
For foreign air carriers or foreign
persons who operate U.S.-registered
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
aircraft in common carriage solely
outside the United States, the FAA
would provide a simplified application
procedure.
Section 129.9 would define the
content of operations specifications to
be issued to either a foreign air carrier
conducting operations within the
United States, or a foreign air carrier or
foreign person operating U.S.-registered
aircraft solely outside the United States
in common carriage. By specifying the
content of the operations specifications
in proposed § 129.9, applicants for these
specifications would have clear
standards for the submission of their
application.
Current regulations do not contain
provisions for the amendment,
suspension or termination of operations
specifications. For example, a foreign air
carrier or foreign person may seek
reconsideration of an adverse decision
relating to its operations specifications
using an informal process not
established in the regulations. An
operator may submit its petition for
reconsideration through the FSDO, or an
FAA Flight Standards Regional Office or
FAA Headquarters. Therefore, there is a
need to standardize and streamline all
petitions for reconsideration through the
office responsible for oversight of the
foreign air carrier or foreign person.
The proposed rule would amend
§ 129.11 to address amendments,
suspensions and terminations of
operations specifications. The
amendment process would be consistent
with the process for amending
operations specifications issued to
domestic operators under part 119.
Under the proposed rule, an applicant
may apply for an amendment of its
operations specification to the
responsible FSDO, or the Administrator
may amend operations specifications if
the Administrator determines that safety
in air commerce and the public interest
require the amendment. Following an
adverse decision, the applicant may
submit a petition for reconsideration to
the Director, Flight Standards Service
within thirty (30) days after the date the
foreign air carrier or foreign person
receives a notice of the decision. The
filing of the petition for reconsideration
suspends the decision unless the
Administrator determines that an
emergency exists requiring immediate
action to maintain safety in air
commerce or air transportation. For
suspension and termination, the FAA
proposes to use a process similar to that
used for amendments; however the
Administrator may conduct
consultations under relevant Air
Services Agreements prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25129
suspending or terminating an operations
specification.
The FAA proposes to amend § 129.13,
the aircraft airworthiness and
registration certificate requirements, to
include recognition of the validity of
certificates of airworthiness issued or
validated by a State of the Operator
under Article 83bis of the Chicago
Convention. Currently § 129.13 requires
airworthiness certificates for foreign air
carriers to be issued or validated by the
State of Registry and does not recognize
Article 83bis agreements with the State
of the Operator, although the U.S.
obligation to accept those agreements is
stated in inspector handbook guidance.
The proposed amendment to § 129.13
would allow recognition of third-party
transfers of airworthiness certificates
under Article 83bis agreements
registered with ICAO.
Similarly, the FAA proposes to amend
§ 129.15 to provide for the recognition
of the validity of crew licenses
(certificates) issued or validated by a
State of the Operator under agreements
whereby the State of Registry of an
aircraft transfers certain oversight
functions to the State of the Operator of
the aircraft in accordance with Article
83bis of the Chicago Convention.
Although this U.S. obligation is also
currently stated in inspector handbook
guidance, § 129.15 requires crew
licenses (certificates) for foreign air
carriers to be issued or validated by the
State of Registry and does not recognize
crew licenses or certificates transferred
under Article 83bis agreements
registered with ICAO.
Present regulations do not define how
the FAA grants maintenance approval
for U.S.-registered aircraft. Therefore,
the FAA proposes to amend § 129.14 by
changing the FAA approval process for
the minimum equipment list (MEL) and
maintenance programs of U.S.-registered
aircraft used by foreign air carriers and
foreign persons. Under this proposed
rule, the FAA would grant maintenance
program and minimum equipment list
approval for U.S.-registered aircraft in
FAA-issued operations specifications,
which is the practice FAA field offices
currently follow.
With the addition of §§ 129.5, 129.7,
129.9, and the amendments to § 129.11
and § 129.14, the FAA proposes to
clarify the applicability of part 129 to
certain operations of U.S.-registered
aircraft operated solely outside the
United States in common carriage by a
foreign person or foreign air carrier.
Therefore, § 129.1(b) would be revised
to clarify that §§ 129.5, 129.7, 129.9,
129.11, 129.14, 129.20 and 129.24 and
subpart B apply to U.S.-registered
aircraft operated solely outside the
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
25130
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
United States in common carriage by a
foreign person or foreign air carrier.
As described in § 119.1(d), part 119
does not govern operations conducted
under part 91, subpart K (when common
carriage is not involved), nor does it
apply to parts 129, 133, 137 or 139.
However, the introductory sentence of
§ 119.3 requires application of the
definitions included in § 119.3 to all of
subchapter G, which includes parts 119,
121, 125, 129, 133, 135, 136, 137 and
139. Because not all of these parts are
subject to the substantive requirements
of part 119, it is not immediately clear
that all of the definitions in § 119.3
apply to subchapter G, including part
129.
The FAA proposes to create a new
part 110 which will set forth the general
requirements applicable to all of
subchapter G, including the definitions
currently located in § 119.3. Section
119.3 is redesignated as § 110.2, and all
of the references in parts 119, 121 and
135 of subchapter G to the definitions
formerly contained in § 119.3 were
changed to § 110.2. These changes to
parts 110, 119, 121 and 135 are editorial
in nature, and the FAA has made no
substantive changes to any of the
definitions transferred to the new part.
Further, this editorial change will have
no impact on the applicability of the
definitions contained in 14 CFR part 1
to subchapter G, unless otherwise
specified.
Additionally, the FAA proposes to
eliminate the outdated reference to the
Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) in 14
CFR 129.1(a)(1). This revision is
necessary since the CAB no longer
exists, and all economic authority is
now granted by the Department of
Transportation (DOT).
Currently, § 129.11(a) requires foreign
air carriers to comply with ICAO
standards and recommended practices
in part 1 of Annex 6 of the Chicago
Convention; however, the Chicago
Convention requires compliance with
ICAO standards only. By amending
§ 129.11(a) to remove the incorrect
reference to ‘‘recommended practices,’’
the proposed rule would clarify the
international standards applicable to
foreign air carriers operating within the
United States.
In 2007, FAA chartered the Part 129
Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC)
to provide advice, guidance and
recommendations on comprehensive
changes to part 129. This proposed rule
does not address the ARC’s
recommendations. The FAA will
consider those recommendations in a
future rulemaking.
To fulfill its oversight responsibilities,
the FAA issues operations specifications
to foreign air carriers and foreign
persons to ensure a common
understanding of the scope of their
operations. Operations specifications
describe: (1) The scope of a foreign air
carrier’s operations into the United
States, including any applicable
authorizations and limitations; and (2)
Maintenance responsibility for U.S.registered aircraft operated by foreign
air carriers and foreign persons within
or outside the United States. The foreign
civil aviation authority is responsible
for the certification and the continuing
oversight of the air carrier or foreign
person’s operations in accordance with
applicable ICAO standards.
The following table summarizes the
proposed changes to existing provisions
of parts 119 and 129, identifies new
provisions, and references the relevant
ICAO standard implemented in the rule,
if applicable.
Existing part 119
Proposed new part 110
Definitions: Definitions applicable to part 129 are currently included in
part 119, subchapter G. Since part 119 applies to certification requirements for part 135 and 121 operators, there is potential confusion concerning whether subchapter G applies to part 129.
Definitions: The proposal would remove definitions from subchapter G
of part 119 and include them in a new part 110.
Existing part 129
Proposed part 129 changes
Ops Specs—Amendment, suspension or termination: Current regulations do not provide for the amendment, suspension, or termination
of Operations Specifications. Information is currently in the Inspector
Guidance.
Application process: The application process and requirements are outdated and impose an unnecessary burden on the operator and the
FAA—No safety value (e.g., Provide names, license type and class
held by each flight crewmember to include en route training—Lufthansa employs numerous airmen that change constantly).
Ops Specs—Amendment, suspension or termination: The proposal
would provide a legal basis for the amendment, suspension, or termination of Operations Specifications.
Appeal process for foreign operators: There is no formal administrative
process for a foreign operator to appeal a decision to amend, suspend or terminate its operations specifications.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Chicago Convention: There is no regulatory provision for the recognition of Article 83bis of the Chicago Convention. However, current
FAA guidance contains this information. (Note: Article 83bis allows
the transfer of certain functions and duties from the State of Registry
to the State of the Operator under an agreement between the States
concerned.)
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposal contains the following
new information collection
requirements. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. section 3507(d)), the FAA has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Application process: The proposal would remove outdated portions of
Appendix A and place general requirements in the new § 129.7(a).
Specific application processes will be contained in Inspector Guidance for easy updating. In addition, the proposal would clarify and
standardize the rules for applications by foreign air carriers and foreign persons for operations specifications issued under 14 CFR part
129.
Appeal process for foreign operators: The proposal would provide an
administrative appeals process allowing foreign operators and foreign persons to submit a petition for reconsideration to the Director,
Flight Standards Service before seeking judicial review under 49
USC 46110.
Chicago Convention: The proposed rule allows the FAA to recognize
crew licenses and/or airworthiness certificates issued or validated by
a State of the Operator under agreements whereby the State of
Registry of an aircraft transfers certain oversight functions to the
State of the Operator in accordance with Article 83bis of the Chicago Convention.
submitted the information requirements
associated with this proposal to the
Office of Management and Budget for its
review.
Title: Part 129 Operations
Specifications.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Summary: This proposed rule would
clarify and standardize the rules for
applications by foreign air carriers and
foreign persons for operations
specifications issued under 14 CFR part
129 and establish new standards for
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
amendment, suspension and
termination of those operations
specifications. The proposed rule would
also apply to foreign persons operating
U.S. registered aircraft in common
carriage solely outside the United
States. This action is necessary to
update the process for issuing
operations specifications, and it will
establish a regulatory basis for current
practices, such as amending,
terminating or suspending operations
specifications.
Use of: This proposal would support
the information needs of the FAA in
order to maintain an adequate level of
safety oversight.
Respondents (including number of):
The likely respondents to this proposed
information requirement are potential
new applicants for operations
specifications. The average number of
respondents is approximately twentyfive each year.
Frequency: The FAA estimates five
Flight Standards District Offices
(FSDOs) will receive approximately five
applications each per year.
Annual Burden Estimate: This
proposal would result in an annual
recordkeeping and reporting burden as
follows: 75 hours annually.
The agency is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of collecting
information on those who are to
respond, including by using appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Individuals and organizations may
send comments on the information
collection requirement by August 5,
2010, and should direct them to the
address listed in the Addresses section
at the end of this preamble. Comments
also should be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for FAA, New
Executive Building, Room 10202, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20053.
According to the 1995 amendments to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR
1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not
collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this information collection
will be published in the Federal
Register, after the Office of Management
and Budget approves it.
IV. International Compatibility
Consistent with U.S. obligations
under the Chicago Convention, it is the
FAA’s policy to comply with ICAO
standards to the maximum extent
practicable. The proposed amendments
will allow the FAA to carry out its
obligations under the Chicago
Convention by providing for the
recognition of the validity of certificates
of airworthiness and crew licenses
issued or validated by a State of the
Operator in accordance with Article
83bis of the Chicago Convention.
Additionally, the provisions relating to
the issuance of operations specifications
are consistent with the ICAO standard
for issuing operations specifications to
operators conducting international air
transportation.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) obtained competence from the
European Parliament to regulate third
country operators of aircraft engaged in
commercial operations into, within or
out of the European Community (EC) in
2008. Regulation (EC) No 216/2008
provides competence to EASA to issue
and renew authorizations for third
country operators and to amend, limit,
suspend or revoke the relevant
authorization. The FAA will continue to
coordinate with EASA on methods to
streamline the operations specifications
process, as appropriate.
V. Regulatory Evaluation, Regulatory
Flexibility Determination, International
Trade Impact Assessment, and
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Proposed changes to Federal
Regulations must undergo several
economic analyses. First, Executive
Order 12866 directs each Federal agency
to propose or adopt a regulation only
upon a reasoned determination that the
benefits of the intended regulation
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354)
requires agencies to analyze the
economic impact of regulatory changes
on small entities. Third, the Trade
Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96–39)
prohibits agencies from setting
standards that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. In developing U.S.
standards, the Trade Act requires
agencies to consider international
standards and, where appropriate, use
them as the basis of U.S. standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25131
Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) requires
agencies to prepare a written assessment
of the costs, benefits, and other effects
of proposed or final rules that include
a Federal mandate likely to result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by
private sector, of $100 million or more
annually (adjusted for inflation with
base year of 1995).
For regulations with an expected
minimal impact, the above-specified
analyses are not required. The
Department of Transportation Order
DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and
procedures for simplification, analysis,
and review of regulations. If it is
determined that the expected impact is
so minimal that the proposal does not
warrant a full evaluation, a statement to
that effect and the basis for it is
included in proposed regulation.
This NPRM will have minimal
economic impact because it does not
propose to significantly change the rules
regarding FAA’s obligation for safety
oversight of foreign air carriers and
foreign persons under the Chicago
Convention, but actually incorporates
ICAO standards for acceptance of
airworthiness certificates and
crewmember licenses under Article
83bis of the Chicago Convention. This
proposed rule also standardizes and
clarifies the operations specification
process. Accordingly, the FAA has
determined as a result of the removal of
outdated requirements in Appendix A,
there may be a reduction in costs for
foreign air carriers or persons who will
need to apply for operations
specifications. Due to streamlining and
clarification of the application process,
there may be a decrease in costs to
foreign air carriers or persons. In
addition, there will be some benefits to
foreign air carriers and foreign persons
by creating an administrative appeals
process. The FAA requests comments
from the public on the costs and
benefits of this proposal, and the
resulting determination that the
proposals within the NPRM will have
minimal economic impact.
Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
25132
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a large
number of small entities. If the agency
determines that it will, the agency must
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This proposed rule would clarify and
standardize the rules for applications by
foreign air carriers and foreign persons
for operations specifications issued
under 14 CFR part 129 and establish
new standards for amendment,
suspension and termination of
operations specifications by
incorporating current policies and
procedures into the regulations. The
proposed rule applies only to foreign air
carriers and operations of U.S.registered aircraft in common carriage
solely outside the United States.
Domestic operators are not impacted by
this proposed rule. This proposed rule
merely revises and clarifies FAA
operations specifications application
procedures; the expected outcome will
not increase cost to any United States
small entity. Therefore, the FAA
certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
purpose of this proposed rule is to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
ensure the safety of the American
public, and it does not exclude imports
that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international
standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. The
proposed rule considers and
incorporates an international standard
promulgated pursuant to the Chicago
Convention and is consistent with
current ICAO standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this
proposed rule and has determined that
it will impose minimal costs on
international entities and may provide
cost-savings to these entities and thus
have a neutral trade impact.
VIII. Environmental Analysis
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector; such a mandate is
deemed to be a ‘‘significant regulatory
action.’’ The FAA currently uses an
inflation-adjusted value of $143.1
million in lieu of $100 million.
This NPRM does not contain such a
mandate. Therefore, the requirements of
Title II of the Act do not apply.
The FAA has analyzed this NPRM
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). It
has determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order, and it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
VI. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed
rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We
determined that this action would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and, therefore,
does not have federalism implications.
VII. Regulations Affecting Intrastate
Aviation in Alaska
Section 1205 of the FAA
Reauthorization Act of 1996 (110 Stat.
3213) requires the Administrator, when
modifying regulations in title 14 CFR in
a manner affecting intrastate aviation in
Alaska, to consider the extent to which
Alaska is not served by transportation
modes other than aviation, and to
establish appropriate regulatory
distinctions. Because this proposed rule
would apply to the application,
amendment, suspension and
termination of operations specifications
of foreign air carriers that operate into
the United States, the rule should not
affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this proposed
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
paragraph 312d and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
IX. Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use
X. Additional Information
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The FAA also invites comments
relating to the economic, environmental,
energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA asks that you
send two copies of written comments.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment
closing date. If you wish to review the
docket in person, go to the address in
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may also review the docket using
the Internet at the web address in the
ADDRESSES section.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy of
rulemaking documents using the
Internet by—
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
3. Accessing the Government Printing
Office’s web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a
request to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by
calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to
identify the docket number, notice
number, or amendment number of this
rulemaking.
You may access all documents the
FAA considered in developing this
proposed rule, including economic
analyses and technical reports, from the
internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced in the
paragraph above.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 110
Administrative practice and
procedure, air carriers, aircraft, aviation
safety, charter flights, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
14 CFR Part 119
Administrative practice and
procedure, air carriers, aircraft, aviation
safety, charter flights, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
14 CFR Part 121
Air carriers, aircraft, airmen, alcohol
abuse, aviation safety, charter flight,
drug abuse, drug testing, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, safety,
transportation.
14 CFR Part 129
Air carriers, aircraft, aviation safety,
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, security measures,
smoking.
14 CFR Part 135
Air taxis, aircraft, airmen, alcohol
abuse, aviation safety, drug abuse, drug
testing, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Proposed Amendments
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend chapter I of title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
1. Add part 110 to read as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 110—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS
Sec.
110.1
110.2
Applicability.
Definitions.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1153, 40101,
40102, 40103, 40113, 44105, 44106, 44111,
44701–44717, 44722, 44901, 44903, 44904,
44906, 44912, 44914, 44936, 44938, 46103,
46105.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 110.1
Applicability.
This part governs all operations
conducted under subchapter G of this
chapter.
§ 110.2
Definitions.
For the purpose of this subchapter,
the term—
All-cargo operation means any
operation for compensation or hire that
is other than a passenger-carrying
operation or, if passengers are carried,
they are only those specified in
§§ 121.583(a) or 135.85 of this chapter.
Certificate-holding district office
means the Flight Standards District
Office that has responsibility for
administering the certificate and is
charged with the overall inspection of
the certificate holder’s operations.
Commercial air tour means a flight
conducted for compensation or hire in
an airplane or helicopter where a
purpose of the flight is sightseeing. The
FAA may consider the following factors
in determining whether a flight is a
commercial air tour:
(1) Whether there was a holding out
to the public of willingness to conduct
a sightseeing flight for compensation or
hire;
(2) Whether the person offering the
flight provided a narrative that referred
to areas or points of interest on the
surface below the route of the flight;
(3) The area of operation;
(4) How often the person offering the
flight conducts such flights;
(5) The route of flight;
(6) The inclusion of sightseeing flights
as part of any travel arrangement
package;
(7) Whether the flight in question
would have been canceled based on
poor visibility of the surface below the
route of the flight; and
(8) Any other factors that the FAA
considers appropriate.
Commuter operation means any
scheduled operation conducted by any
person operating one of the following
types of aircraft with a frequency of
operations of at least five round trips
per week on at least one route between
two or more points according to the
published flight schedules:
(1) Airplanes, other than turbojet
powered airplanes, having a maximum
passenger-seat configuration of 9 seats
or less, excluding each crewmember
seat, and a maximum payload capacity
of 7,500 pounds or less; or
(2) Rotorcraft.
Direct air carrier means a person who
provides or offers to provide air
transportation and who has control over
the operational functions performed in
providing that transportation.
DOD commercial air carrier evaluator
means a qualified Air Mobility
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25133
Command, Survey and Analysis Office
(AMC/DOB) cockpit evaluator
performing the duties specified in
Public Law 99–661 when the evaluator
is flying on an air carrier that is
contracted or pursuing a contract with
the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
Domestic operation means any
scheduled operation conducted by any
person operating any airplane described
in paragraph (1) of this definition at
locations described in paragraph (2) of
this definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Turbojet-powered airplanes;
(ii) Airplanes having a passenger-seat
configuration of more than 9 passenger
seats, excluding each crewmember seat;
or
(iii) Airplanes having a payload
capacity of more than 7,500 pounds.
(2) Locations:
(i) Between any points within the 48
contiguous States of the United States or
the District of Columbia; or
(ii) Operations solely within the 48
contiguous States of the United States or
the District of Columbia; or
(iii) Operations entirely within any
State, territory, or possession of the
United States; or
(iv) When specifically authorized by
the Administrator, operations between
any point within the 48 contiguous
States of the United States or the District
of Columbia and any specifically
authorized point located outside the 48
contiguous States of the United States or
the District of Columbia.
Empty weight means the weight of the
airframe, engines, propellers, rotors, and
fixed equipment. Empty weight
excludes the weight of the crew and
payload, but includes the weight of all
fixed ballast, unusable fuel supply,
undrainable oil, total quantity of engine
coolant, and total quantity of hydraulic
fluid.
Flag operation means any scheduled
operation conducted by any person
operating any airplane described in
paragraph (1) of this definition at the
locations described in paragraph (2) of
this definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Turbojet-powered airplanes;
(ii) Airplanes having a passenger-seat
configuration of more than 9 passenger
seats, excluding each crewmember seat;
or
(iii) Airplanes having a payload
capacity of more than 7,500 pounds.
(2) Locations:
(i) Between any point within the State
of Alaska or the State of Hawaii or any
territory or possession of the United
States and any point outside the State of
Alaska or the State of Hawaii or any
territory or possession of the United
States, respectively; or
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
25134
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Between any point within the 48
contiguous States of the United States or
the District of Columbia and any point
outside the 48 contiguous States of the
United States and the District of
Columbia.
(iii) Between any point outside the
U.S. and another point outside the U.S.
Justifiable aircraft equipment means
any equipment necessary for the
operation of the aircraft. It does not
include equipment or ballast
specifically installed, permanently or
otherwise, for the purpose of altering
the empty weight of an aircraft to meet
the maximum payload capacity.
Kind of operation means one of the
various operations a certificate holder is
authorized to conduct, as specified in its
operations specifications, i.e., domestic,
flag, supplemental, commuter, or ondemand operations.
Maximum payload capacity means:
(1) For an aircraft for which a
maximum zero fuel weight is prescribed
in FAA technical specifications, the
maximum zero fuel weight, less empty
weight, less all justifiable aircraft
equipment, and less the operating load
(consisting of minimum flightcrew,
foods and beverages, and supplies and
equipment related to foods and
beverages, but not including disposable
fuel or oil).
(2) For all other aircraft, the maximum
certificated takeoff weight of an aircraft,
less the empty weight, less all justifiable
aircraft equipment, and less the
operating load (consisting of minimum
fuel load, oil, and flightcrew). The
allowance for the weight of the crew,
oil, and fuel is as follows:
(i) Crew—for each crewmember
required by the Federal Aviation
Regulations—
(A) For male flight crewmembers—
180 pounds.
(B) For female flight crewmembers—
140 pounds.
(C) For male flight attendants—180
pounds.
(D) For female flight attendants—130
pounds.
(E) For flight attendants not identified
by gender—140 pounds.
(ii) Oil—350 pounds or the oil
capacity as specified on the Type
Certificate Data Sheet.
(iii) Fuel—the minimum weight of
fuel required by the applicable Federal
Aviation Regulations for a flight
between domestic points 174 nautical
miles apart under VFR weather
conditions that does not involve
extended overwater operations.
Maximum zero fuel weight means the
maximum permissible weight of an
aircraft with no disposable fuel or oil.
The zero fuel weight figure may be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
found in either the aircraft type
certificate data sheet, the approved
Aircraft Flight Manual, or both.
Noncommon carriage means an
aircraft operation for compensation or
hire that does not involve a holding out
to others.
On-demand operation means any
operation for compensation or hire that
is one of the following:
(1) Passenger-carrying operations
conducted as a public charter under part
380 of this chapter or any operations in
which the departure time, departure
location, and arrival location are
specifically negotiated with the
customer or the customer’s
representative that are any of the
following types of operations:
(i) Common carriage operations
conducted with airplanes, including
turbojet-powered airplanes, having a
passenger-seat configuration of 30 seats
or fewer, excluding each crewmember
seat, and a payload capacity of 7,500
pounds or less, except that operations
using a specific airplane that is also
used in domestic or flag operations and
that is so listed in the operations
specifications as required by
§ 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those
operations are considered supplemental
operations;
(ii) Noncommon or private carriage
operations conducted with airplanes
having a passenger-seat configuration of
less than 20 seats, excluding each
crewmember seat, and a payload
capacity of less than 6,000 pounds; or
(iii) Any rotorcraft operation.
(2) Scheduled passenger-carrying
operations conducted with one of the
following types of aircraft with a
frequency of operations of less than five
round trips per week on at least one
route between two or more points
according to the published flight
schedules:
(i) Airplanes, other than turbojet
powered airplanes, having a maximum
passenger-seat configuration of 9 seats
or less, excluding each crewmember
seat, and a maximum payload capacity
of 7,500 pounds or less; or
(ii) Rotorcraft.
(3) All-cargo operations conducted
with airplanes having a payload
capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, or with
rotorcraft.
Passenger-carrying operation means
any aircraft operation carrying any
person, unless the only persons on the
aircraft are those identified in
§§ 121.583(a) or 135.85 of this chapter,
as applicable. An aircraft used in a
passenger-carrying operation may also
carry cargo or mail in addition to
passengers.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Principal base of operations means
the primary operating location of a
certificate holder as established by the
certificate holder.
Provisional airport means an airport
approved by the Administrator for use
by a certificate holder for the purpose of
providing service to a community when
the regular airport used by the
certificate holder is not available.
Regular airport means an airport used
by a certificate holder in scheduled
operations and listed in its operations
specifications.
Scheduled operation means any
common carriage passenger-carrying
operation for compensation or hire
conducted by an air carrier or
commercial operator for which the
certificate holder or its representative
offers in advance the departure location,
departure time, and arrival location. It
does not include any passenger-carrying
operation that is conducted as a public
charter operation under part 380 of this
chapter.
Supplemental operation means any
common carriage operation for
compensation or hire conducted with
any airplane described in paragraph (1)
of this definition that is a type of
operation described in paragraph (2) of
this definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Airplanes having a passenger-seat
configuration of more than 30 seats,
excluding each crewmember seat;
(ii) Airplanes having a payload
capacity of more than 7,500 pounds; or
(iii) Each propeller-powered airplane
having a passenger-seat configuration of
more than 9 seats and less than 31 seats,
excluding each crewmember seat, that is
also used in domestic or flag operations
and that is so listed in the operations
specifications as required by
§ 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those
operations; or
(iv) Each turbojet powered airplane
having a passenger seat configuration of
1 or more and less than 31 seats,
excluding each crewmember seat, that is
also used in domestic or flag operations
and that is so listed in the operations
specifications as required by
§ 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those
operations.
(2) Types of operation:
(i) Operations for which the departure
time, departure location, and arrival
location are specifically negotiated with
the customer or the customer’s
representative;
(ii) All-cargo operations; or
(iii) Passenger-carrying public charter
operations conducted under part 380 of
this chapter.
Wet lease means any leasing
arrangement whereby a person agrees to
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
provide an entire aircraft and at least
one crewmember. A wet lease does not
include a code-sharing arrangement.
When common carriage is not
involved or operations not involving
common carriage means any of the
following:
(1) Noncommon carriage.
(2) Operations in which persons or
cargo are transported without
compensation or hire.
(3) Operations not involving the
transportation of persons or cargo.
(4) Private carriage.
Years in service means the calendar
time elapsed since an aircraft was
issued its first U.S. or first foreign
airworthiness certificate.
PART 119—CERTIFICATION: AIR
CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL
OPERATORS
2. The authority citation for part 119
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1153, 40101,
40102, 40103, 40113, 44105, 44106, 44111,
44701–44717, 44722, 44901, 44903, 44904,
44906, 44912, 44914, 44936, 44938, 46103,
46105.
§ 119.3
[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve § 119.3.
§ 119.51
[Amended]
4. Amend § 119.51(c)(1)(i) by
removing the citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and
adding the citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
§ 119.53
[Amended]
5. Amend § 119.53(e) by removing the
citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and adding the
citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
PART 121—CERTIFICATION: AIR
CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL
OPERATORS
6. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40119, 41706, 44101, 44701, 44702, 44705,
44709, 44710, 44711, 44713, 44716, 44717,
44722, 46105.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 121.313
[Amended]
7. Amend § 121.313 by removing the
citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and adding the
citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
§ 121.582
[Amended]
8. Amend § 121.582 by removing the
citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and adding the
citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 129—OPERATIONS: FOREIGN
AIR CARRIERS AND FOREIGN
OPERATORS OF U.S.-REGISTERED
AIRCRAFT ENGAGED IN COMMON
CARRIAGE
9. The authority citation for part 129
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1372, 40113, 40119,
44101, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709–44711,
44713, 44716–44717, 44722, 44901–44904,
44906, 44912, 46105, Pub. L. 107–71 sec,
104.
10. Amend § 129.1 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (b) to read
as follows:
§ 129.1
Applicability and definitions.
(a) * * *
(1) A permit issued by the U.S.
Department of Transportation under 49
U.S.C. 41301 through 41306, or
(2) Other appropriate economic or
exemption authority issued by the U.S.
Department of Transportation.
(b) Operations of U.S.-registered
aircraft solely outside the United States.
In addition to the operations specified
under paragraph (a) of this section,
§§ 129.5, 129.7, 129.9, 129.11, 129.14,
129.20 and 24, and subpart B of this part
also apply to operations of U.S.registered aircraft operated solely
outside the United States in common
carriage by a foreign person or foreign
air carrier.
*
*
*
*
*
11. Add § 129.5 to read as follows:
§ 129.5 Operations specifications.
(a) Each foreign air carrier conducting
operations within the United States, and
each foreign air carrier or foreign person
operating U.S. registered aircraft solely
outside the United States in common
carriage must conduct its operations in
accordance with operations
specifications issued by the
Administrator under this part.
(b) Each foreign air carrier conducting
operations within the United States
must conduct its operations in
accordance with the Standards
contained in Annex 1 (Personnel
Licensing), Annex 6 (Operation of
Aircraft), Part I (International
Commercial Air Transport—Aeroplanes)
or Part III (International Operations—
Helicopters), as appropriate, and in
Annex 8 (Airworthiness of Aircraft) to
the Convention on International Civil
Aviation.
(c) No foreign air carrier may operate
to or from locations within the United
States without, or in violation of,
appropriate operations specifications.
(d) No foreign air carrier or foreign
person shall operate U.S. registered
aircraft solely outside the United States
in common carriage without, or in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25135
violation of, appropriate operations
specifications.
(e) Each foreign air carrier must keep
each of its employees and other persons
used in its operations informed of the
provisions of its operations
specifications that apply to that
employee’s or person’s duties and
responsibilities.
(f) Operations specifications issued
under this part are effective until—
(1) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person surrenders them to the FAA;
(2) The Administrator suspends or
terminates the operations specifications;
or
(3) The operations specifications are
amended as provided in § 129.11.
(g) Within 30 days after a foreign air
carrier or foreign person terminates
operations under part 129 of this
subchapter, the operations
specifications must be surrendered by
the foreign air carrier or foreign person
to the responsible Flight Standards
District Office.
(h) No person operating under this
part may operate or list on its operations
specifications any airplane listed on
operations specifications issued under
part 125 of this chapter.
12. Add § 129.7 to read as follows:
§ 129.7 Application, issuance, or
denial of operations specifications.
(a) A foreign air carrier or foreign
person applying to the FAA for
operations specifications under this part
must submit an application—
(1) In a form and manner prescribed
by the Administrator; and
(2) At least 90 days before the
intended date of operation.
(b) An authorized officer or employee
of the applicant, having knowledge of
the matters stated in the application,
must sign the application and certify in
writing that the statements in the
application are true. The application
must include two copies of the
appropriate written authority issued to
that officer or employee by the
applicant.
(c) A foreign applicant may be issued
operations specifications, if after review,
the Administrator finds the applicant—
(1) Meets the applicable requirements
of this part;
(2) Holds the economic or exemption
authority required by the Department of
Transportation, applicable to the
operations to be conducted;
(3) Complies with the applicable
security requirements of 49 CFR chapter
XII;
(4) Is properly and adequately
equipped to conduct the operations
described in the operations
specifications; and
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
25136
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(5) Holds a valid air operator
certificate issued by the State of the
Operator.
(d) An application may be denied if
the Administrator finds that the
applicant is not properly or adequately
equipped to conduct the operations to
be described in the operations
specifications.
13. Add § 129.9 to read as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 129.9 Contents of operations
specifications.
(a) The contents of operations
specifications issued to a foreign air
carrier conducting operations within the
United States under § 129.1(a) shall
include:
(1) The specific location and mailing
address of the applicant’s principal
place of business in the State of the
Operator and, if different, the address
that will serve as the primary point of
contact for correspondence between the
FAA and the foreign air carrier;
(2) The designation of an agent for
service within the United States,
including the agent’s full name and
office address or usual place of
residence;
(3) The certificate number and
validity of the foreign air carrier’s Air
Operator Certificate issued by the State
of the Operator;
(4) Each regular and alternate airport
to be used in scheduled operations;
(5) The type of aircraft and
registration markings of each aircraft;
(6) The approved maintenance
program and minimum equipment lists
for United States registered aircraft
authorized for use; and
(7) Any other item the Administrator
determines is necessary.
(b) The contents of operations
specifications issued to a foreign air
carrier or foreign person operating U.S.registered aircraft solely outside the
United States in common carriage in
accordance with § 129.1(b) shall
include—
(1) The specific location and mailing
address of the principal place of
business in the State of the Operator
and, if different, the address that will
serve as the primary point of contact for
correspondence between the FAA and
the foreign air carrier or foreign person;
(2) The designation of an agent for
service within the United States,
including the agent’s full name and
office address or usual place of
residence;
(3) In the case of a foreign air carrier,
the certificate number and validity of
the foreign air carrier’s Air Operator
Certificate issued by the State of the
Operator;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
(4) Any other business names under
which the foreign air carrier or foreign
person may operate;
(5) The type, registration markings,
and serial number of each United States
registered aircraft authorized for use;
(6) The approval of maintenance
programs and minimum equipment lists
for United States registered aircraft
authorized for use; and
(7) Any other item the Administrator
determines is necessary.
14. Revise § 129.11 to read as follows:
§ 129.11 Amendment, suspension, and
termination of operations specifications.
(a) The Administrator may amend any
operations specifications issued under
this part if—
(1) The Administrator determines that
safety in air commerce and the public
interest require the amendment; or
(2) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person applies for an amendment, and
the Administrator determines that safety
in air commerce and the public interest
allows the amendment.
(b) The Administrator may suspend or
terminate any operations specifications
issued under this part if the
Administrator determines that safety in
air commerce and the public interest
require the suspension or termination;
(c) Except as provided in paragraphs
(f) and (g) of this section, when the
Administrator initiates an action to
amend, suspend or terminate a foreign
air carrier or foreign person’s operations
specifications, the following procedure
applies:
(1) The responsible Flight Standards
District Office notifies the foreign air
carrier or foreign person in writing of
the proposed amendment, suspension or
termination.
(2) The responsible Flight Standards
District Office sets a reasonable period
(but not less than 7 days) within which
the foreign air carrier or foreign person
may submit written information, views,
and arguments on the amendment,
suspension or termination.
(3) After considering all material
presented, the responsible Flight
Standards District Office notifies the
foreign air carrier or foreign person of—
(i) The adoption of the proposed
amendment, suspension or termination;
(ii) The partial adoption of the
proposed amendment, suspension or
termination; or
(iii) The withdrawal of the proposed
amendment, suspension or termination.
(4) If the responsible Flight Standards
District Office issues an action to
amend, suspend or terminate the
operations specifications, it becomes
effective not less than 30 days after the
foreign air carrier or foreign person
receives notice of it unless—
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(i) The responsible Flight Standards
District Office finds under paragraph (g)
of this section that there is an
emergency requiring immediate action
with respect to safety in air commerce;
or
(ii) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person petitions for reconsideration of
the amendment, suspension or
termination under paragraph (e) of this
section.
(d) When the foreign air carrier or
foreign person applies for an
amendment to its operations
specifications, the following procedure
applies:
(1) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person must file an application to
amend its operations specifications—
(i) At least 90 days before the date
proposed by the applicant for the
amendment to become effective in cases
of mergers; acquisitions of airline
operational assets that require an
additional showing to Department of
Transportation for economic authority;
major changes in the type of operation
and resumption of operations following
a suspension of operations as a result of
bankruptcy actions, unless a shorter
time is approved by the Administrator.
(ii) At least 30 days before the date
proposed by the applicant for the
amendment to become effective in all
other cases.
(2) The application must be submitted
to the responsible Flight Standards
District Office in a form and manner
prescribed by the Administrator.
(3) After considering all material
presented, the responsible Flight
Standards District Office notifies the
foreign air carrier or foreign person of—
(i) The adoption of the applied for
amendment;
(ii) The partial adoption of the
applied for amendment; or
(iii) The denial of the applied for
amendment.
(4) If the responsible Flight Standards
District Office approves the amendment,
following coordination with the foreign
air carrier or foreign person regarding its
implementation, the amendment is
effective on the date the responsible
Flight Standards District Office
approves it.
(e) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person may petition for reconsideration
of a full or partial adoption of an
amendment, a denial of an amendment
or a suspension or termination of
operations specifications.
(f) When a foreign air carrier or
foreign person seeks reconsideration of
a decision from the responsible Flight
Standards District Office concerning the
amendment, suspension or termination
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 129.14 Maintenance program and
minimum equipment list requirements for
U.S.-registered aircraft.
§ 129.13 Airworthiness and registration
certificates.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
of operations specifications, the
following procedure applies:
(1) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person must petition for reconsideration
of that decision within 30 days after the
date that the foreign air carrier or
foreign person receives a notice of the
decision.
(2) The foreign air carrier or foreign
person must address its petition to the
Director, Flight Standards Service.
(3) A petition for reconsideration, if
filed within the 30-day period, suspends
the effectiveness of any amendment,
suspension or termination issued by the
responsible Flight Standards District
Office unless the responsible Flight
Standards District Office has found,
under paragraph (g) of this section, that
an emergency exists requiring
immediate action with respect to safety
in air transportation or air commerce.
(g) If the responsible Flight Standards
District Office finds that an emergency
exists requiring immediate action with
respect to safety in air commerce or air
transportation that makes the
procedures set out in this section
impracticable or contrary to the public
interest, that office may make the
amendment, suspension or termination
effective on the day the foreign air
carrier or foreign person receives notice
of it. In the notice to the foreign air
carrier or foreign person, the responsible
Flight Standards District Office will
articulate the reasons for its finding that
an emergency exists requiring
immediate action with respect to safety
in air transportation or air commerce or
that makes it impracticable or contrary
to the public interest to stay the
effectiveness of the amendment,
suspension or termination.
15. Amend § 129.13 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 129 [Removed and
Reserved]
(a) No foreign air carrier may operate
any aircraft within the United States
unless that aircraft carries a current
registration certificate and displays the
nationality and registration markings of
the State of Registry, and an
airworthiness certificate issued or
validated by:
(1) The State of Registry; or
(2) The State of the Operator,
provided that the State of the Operator
and the State of Registry have entered
into an agreement under Article 83bis of
the Convention on International Civil
Aviation that covers the aircraft.
*
*
*
*
*
16. Amend § 129.14 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b)(4) and (b)(7) to read
as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
(a) Each foreign air carrier and each
foreign person operating a U.S.registered aircraft within or outside the
United States in common carriage must
ensure that each aircraft is maintained
in accordance with a program approved
by the Administrator in the operations
specifications.
(b) * * *
(4) The FAA operations specification
permitting the operator to use an
approved minimum equipment list is
carried aboard the aircraft. An approved
minimum equipment list, as authorized
by the operations specifications,
constitutes an approved change to the
type design without requiring
recertification.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) The aircraft is operated under all
applicable conditions and limitations
contained in the minimum equipment
list and the operations specification
authorizing the use of the list.
17. Revise § 129.15 to read as follows:
§ 129.15
Flight crewmember certificates.
Each person acting as a flight
crewmember must hold a certificate or
license that shows the person’s ability to
perform duties in connection with the
operation of the aircraft. The certificate
or license must have been issued or
rendered valid by:
(a) The State in which the aircraft is
registered; or
(b) The State of the Operator,
provided that the State of the Operator
and the State of Registry have entered
into an agreement under Article 83bis of
the Convention on International Civil
Aviation that covers the aircraft.
18. Remove and reserve Appendix A to
part 129.
PART 135—OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND
ON DEMAND OPERATIONS AND
RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON
BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT
19. The authority citation for part 135
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 41706,
44701, 44702, 44705, 44709, 44711, 44713,
44715, 44717, 44722, 46105.
§ 135.127
[Amended]
20. Amend § 135.127(b)(1)(iii) by
removing the citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and
adding the citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 135.127
25137
[Amended]
21. Amend § 135.127(b)(2) by
removing the citation ‘‘§ 119.3’’ and
adding the citation ‘‘§ 110.2’’ in its place.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 4, 2010.
Raymond Towles,
Acting Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–10890 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 173, 174, 181, and 187
[Docket No. USCG–2003–14963]
RIN 1625–AB45
Changes to Standard Numbering
System, Vessel Identification System,
and Boating Accident Report Database
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
amend its rules related to numbering of
undocumented vessels and reporting of
casualties. These changes would align
and modernize terminology used in the
Standard Numbering System (SNS), the
Vessel Identification System (VIS), and
casualty reporting; require validation of
vessel hull identification numbers;
require SNS vessel owners to provide
personally identifiable information; and
provide administrative flexibility for
States. Together, the proposed changes
would improve recreational boating
safety efforts, enhance law enforcement
capabilities, advance maritime security,
and clarify requirements for all
stakeholders.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before August 5, 2010 or reach the
Docket Management Facility by that
date. Comments sent to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) on
collection of information must reach
OMB on or before August 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2003–14963 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25127-25137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10890]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 110, 119, 121, 129, and 135
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0140; Notice No. 10-07]
RIN 2120-AJ45
Operations Specifications
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would clarify and standardize the rules for
applications by foreign air carriers and foreign persons for operations
specifications and establish new standards for amendment, suspension or
termination of those operations specifications. The proposed rule would
also apply to foreign persons operating U.S.-registered aircraft in
common carriage solely outside the United States. This action is
necessary to update the process for issuing operations specifications,
and it will establish a regulatory basis for current practices, such as
amending, terminating or suspending operations specifications.
DATES: Send your comments on or before August 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2009-
0140 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-
140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
For more information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the electronic form of all comments received into any of
our dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment
(or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you
may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time and follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket, or, go to the Docket Operations
in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darcy D. Reed, International Programs
and Policy Division, AFS-50, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; e-
mail: darcy.d.reed@faa.gov; Telephone: 202-385-8078. For legal
questions concerning this proposed rule contact Lorna John, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, AGC-200, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; e-
mail: Lorna.John@faa.gov; telephone: 202-267-3921.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Additional Information section of
this preamble, you will find a discussion of how you can comment on
this proposal and how the agency will handle your comments. Included in
this discussion is related information about the docket, privacy, and
handling proprietary or confidential business information. There is
also a discussion on how you can get a copy of related rulemaking
documents.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This proposed rule is issued under the authority described in Title
49 of the United States Code, Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III,
Section 44701(a)(5). Under that section, the Administrator is charged
with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations and minimum standards for practices, methods,
and procedures the Administrator finds
[[Page 25128]]
necessary to ensure safety in air commerce. Clarifying and
standardizing the rules for application, amendment, suspension, or
termination of operations specifications issued to foreign air carriers
operating in the United States and to foreign air carriers or foreign
persons conducting operations of U.S.-registered aircraft solely
outside the United States enhances the FAA's oversight of U.S.-
registered aircraft and those foreign air carriers' operations within
the United States.
I. Background
Title 49 of the United States Code contains the basic authority for
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce and for
regulating the global operations of U.S.-registered aircraft. For
foreign air carriers serving the United States, the basic operating
requirements are found in 14 CFR parts 91 and 129. The standards set
forth in Annexes 1, 6, and 8 to the Convention on International Civil
Aviation (the Chicago Convention), as implemented by the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), also apply to the international
operations of air carriers. The applicable ICAO Annexes are:
Annex 1--Personnel Licensing,
Annex 6--Part I, Operation of Aircraft--International Commercial
Air Transport--Aeroplanes,
Annex 6--Part III, Operation of Aircraft--International
Operations--Helicopters, and
Annex 8--Airworthiness of Aircraft.
ICAO Annexes contain the international standards for safety,
regulation, and efficiency of air navigation. These international
standards define the minimum level of safety necessary for the
recognition by Contracting States to the Chicago Convention of
certificates of airworthiness, certificates of competency and licenses
that allow for the flight of aircraft of other States into or over
their territories. They also provide for the protection of other
aircraft, third parties, and property. As with all Contracting States
to the Chicago Convention, the United States is obligated to recognize
only those certificates of airworthiness, certificates of competency,
and licenses issued or rendered valid by another Contracting State. The
requirements under which these certificates or licenses are issued or
rendered valid by the Contracting State must be equal to or above the
minimum standards established by the Chicago Convention.
The FAA's authority over a foreign air carrier using foreign-
registered aircraft is limited to overseeing compliance with all the
applicable provisions of the Chicago Convention and its Annexes, and
U.S. regulations for the flights conducted by the foreign air carrier
into the United States. Adherence to these standards assures the
foreign air carrier's ability to navigate and communicate safely within
the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) while protecting individuals
and property on the ground.
To fulfill its oversight responsibilities, the FAA issues
operations specifications to foreign air carriers and foreign persons.
These operations specifications ensure a common understanding between
the foreign air carrier or foreign person and the FAA. The FAA-issued
operations specifications describe the scope of a foreign air carrier's
operations into the United States, including any applicable
authorizations and limitations, and a foreign person's maintenance
responsibility for U.S.-registered aircraft operated in common carriage
solely outside the United States. The FAA-issued operations
specifications do not, however, affect or interfere with the
responsibilities of the foreign Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) that
issued an air operator certificate to the foreign air carrier. The
foreign CAA maintains primary responsibility for the certification of
the foreign air carrier and the continuing oversight of the air carrier
or foreign person's operations in accordance with applicable ICAO
standards.
II. Discussion of the Proposal
14 CFR part 129 prescribes the rules governing foreign air carrier
operations within the United States and the operations of U.S.-
registered aircraft solely outside the United States in common
carriage. In order to meet international standards and the changing
aviation environment, it is necessary to revise part 129. For example,
the processes for application and amendment of operations
specifications for U.S. operators subject to 14 CFR parts 121, 125, and
135 are described in part 119. However, there are no explicit
provisions governing the application for, or amendment of, operations
specifications issued to foreign air carriers or foreign persons in
part 129, nor is there a provision in part 129 for the suspension or
termination of operations specifications. Therefore, the FAA proposes
to clarify the process for application, amendment, suspension, and
termination of operations specifications issued to foreign air carriers
and foreign persons.
This proposal would add three new sections to subpart A: Sec.
129.5, Operations Specifications; Sec. 129.7, Application, issuance,
or denial of operations specifications; and Sec. 129.9, Contents of
operations specifications. This proposed rule would also amend the
existing Sec. 129.11 to specifically address amendment, suspension and
termination of operations specifications.
Section 129.5 would define which foreign air carriers or foreign
persons must hold FAA operations specifications and the effective
period of such operations specifications. Current regulations require
only foreign air carriers conducting operations into the United States
to conduct their operations in accordance with operations
specifications issued by the Administrator. Section 129.5 of the
proposed rule would extend this requirement to a foreign air carrier or
foreign person operating a U.S.-registered aircraft solely outside the
United States in common carriage. Additionally, the FAA proposes to
include a provision in Sec. 129.5 requiring the foreign air carrier to
keep each of its employees, and other persons used in its operations,
informed of the provisions of its FAA-issued operations specifications
that apply to that employee's or person's duties and responsibilities.
In Sec. 129.7, the FAA proposes to include provisions governing
the application, issuance, or denial of operations specifications. The
application process for foreign air carriers is presently defined in
Sec. 129.11(b) and Appendix A of part 129. It contains outdated
requirements that are no longer relevant to the FAA's safety oversight
needs.\1\ Also, unlike the process for domestic air carrier applicants,
which allows more cooperation between the applicant and the FAA,
current Appendix A of part 129 requires a foreign applicant to provide
very specific information in a particular format. Requiring this degree
of detail in form and content does not advance aviation safety and may
limit the flexibility necessary to ensure the safety of the flying
public. The FAA proposes to remove Appendix A and place general
requirements in the new Sec. 129.7(a). However, proposed Sec.
129.7(b) would retain the current requirement in Appendix A, section
VIII.B for the applicant to provide a written certification that the
statements in the application are true. Using this approach allows the
operations specification process to be easily revised
[[Page 25129]]
and updated to meet the changing aviation environment and FAA safety
oversight needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An example of an outdated requirement is a listing of the
type and class of certificate held by each flight crewmember
employed in the proposed operation within the United States. This
requirement is duplicative. Contracting states to the Chicago
Convention are obligated to recognize as valid certificates and
licenses issued by other contracting states.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon issuance of the final rule, the FAA will revise the inspector
handbook guidance with an updated application procedure for foreign
applicants to obtain FAA-issued foreign operations specifications. The
procedure would provide for greater interaction between the foreign
applicant and the FAA and ensure that a foreign applicant's programs,
systems, and intended methods of compliance are thoroughly reviewed and
evaluated in light of U.S. requirements.
The proposed application procedure is as follows:
Preapplication. The foreign applicant makes an inquiry to the FAA
regarding the process for obtaining operations specifications. The FAA
will provide the foreign applicant with an application package and
information on the operations specifications application process.
Formal Application. The responsible Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO) will conduct an in-depth review of the foreign air
carrier's formal application for operations specifications. Also, the
responsible office will hold a formal application meeting to discuss
the feasibility of the project and obtain any additional information or
request corrections needed for its review.
Documentation. The responsible FSDO will review the applicant's
documents in support of its request for issuance of mandatory and
optional operations specifications.
Verification. The responsible FSDO will verify the foreign air
carrier applicant's DOT economic authority and TSA security program
approval (if required).
Issuance. The FAA will assign an operations specification
designator and number, and the part 129 operations specifications will
be generated and issued to the applicant for acceptance and signature.
After issuance, the responsible FSDO will implement a comprehensive
ongoing surveillance program.
Using this procedure would allow the FAA to verify that the foreign
applicant's programs, systems, and intended methods of compliance have
been approved or accepted by the State of the Operator. The information
obtained during the application process would also provide the FAA with
a basis to determine whether the applicant would be able to comply with
all applicable FAA requirements while operating in the NAS.
For foreign air carriers or foreign persons who operate U.S.-
registered aircraft in common carriage solely outside the United
States, the FAA would provide a simplified application procedure.
Section 129.9 would define the content of operations specifications
to be issued to either a foreign air carrier conducting operations
within the United States, or a foreign air carrier or foreign person
operating U.S.-registered aircraft solely outside the United States in
common carriage. By specifying the content of the operations
specifications in proposed Sec. 129.9, applicants for these
specifications would have clear standards for the submission of their
application.
Current regulations do not contain provisions for the amendment,
suspension or termination of operations specifications. For example, a
foreign air carrier or foreign person may seek reconsideration of an
adverse decision relating to its operations specifications using an
informal process not established in the regulations. An operator may
submit its petition for reconsideration through the FSDO, or an FAA
Flight Standards Regional Office or FAA Headquarters. Therefore, there
is a need to standardize and streamline all petitions for
reconsideration through the office responsible for oversight of the
foreign air carrier or foreign person.
The proposed rule would amend Sec. 129.11 to address amendments,
suspensions and terminations of operations specifications. The
amendment process would be consistent with the process for amending
operations specifications issued to domestic operators under part 119.
Under the proposed rule, an applicant may apply for an amendment of its
operations specification to the responsible FSDO, or the Administrator
may amend operations specifications if the Administrator determines
that safety in air commerce and the public interest require the
amendment. Following an adverse decision, the applicant may submit a
petition for reconsideration to the Director, Flight Standards Service
within thirty (30) days after the date the foreign air carrier or
foreign person receives a notice of the decision. The filing of the
petition for reconsideration suspends the decision unless the
Administrator determines that an emergency exists requiring immediate
action to maintain safety in air commerce or air transportation. For
suspension and termination, the FAA proposes to use a process similar
to that used for amendments; however the Administrator may conduct
consultations under relevant Air Services Agreements prior to
suspending or terminating an operations specification.
The FAA proposes to amend Sec. 129.13, the aircraft airworthiness
and registration certificate requirements, to include recognition of
the validity of certificates of airworthiness issued or validated by a
State of the Operator under Article 83bis of the Chicago Convention.
Currently Sec. 129.13 requires airworthiness certificates for foreign
air carriers to be issued or validated by the State of Registry and
does not recognize Article 83bis agreements with the State of the
Operator, although the U.S. obligation to accept those agreements is
stated in inspector handbook guidance. The proposed amendment to Sec.
129.13 would allow recognition of third-party transfers of
airworthiness certificates under Article 83bis agreements registered
with ICAO.
Similarly, the FAA proposes to amend Sec. 129.15 to provide for
the recognition of the validity of crew licenses (certificates) issued
or validated by a State of the Operator under agreements whereby the
State of Registry of an aircraft transfers certain oversight functions
to the State of the Operator of the aircraft in accordance with Article
83bis of the Chicago Convention. Although this U.S. obligation is also
currently stated in inspector handbook guidance, Sec. 129.15 requires
crew licenses (certificates) for foreign air carriers to be issued or
validated by the State of Registry and does not recognize crew licenses
or certificates transferred under Article 83bis agreements registered
with ICAO.
Present regulations do not define how the FAA grants maintenance
approval for U.S.-registered aircraft. Therefore, the FAA proposes to
amend Sec. 129.14 by changing the FAA approval process for the minimum
equipment list (MEL) and maintenance programs of U.S.-registered
aircraft used by foreign air carriers and foreign persons. Under this
proposed rule, the FAA would grant maintenance program and minimum
equipment list approval for U.S.-registered aircraft in FAA-issued
operations specifications, which is the practice FAA field offices
currently follow.
With the addition of Sec. Sec. 129.5, 129.7, 129.9, and the
amendments to Sec. 129.11 and Sec. 129.14, the FAA proposes to
clarify the applicability of part 129 to certain operations of U.S.-
registered aircraft operated solely outside the United States in common
carriage by a foreign person or foreign air carrier. Therefore, Sec.
129.1(b) would be revised to clarify that Sec. Sec. 129.5, 129.7,
129.9, 129.11, 129.14, 129.20 and 129.24 and subpart B apply to U.S.-
registered aircraft operated solely outside the
[[Page 25130]]
United States in common carriage by a foreign person or foreign air
carrier.
As described in Sec. 119.1(d), part 119 does not govern operations
conducted under part 91, subpart K (when common carriage is not
involved), nor does it apply to parts 129, 133, 137 or 139. However,
the introductory sentence of Sec. 119.3 requires application of the
definitions included in Sec. 119.3 to all of subchapter G, which
includes parts 119, 121, 125, 129, 133, 135, 136, 137 and 139. Because
not all of these parts are subject to the substantive requirements of
part 119, it is not immediately clear that all of the definitions in
Sec. 119.3 apply to subchapter G, including part 129.
The FAA proposes to create a new part 110 which will set forth the
general requirements applicable to all of subchapter G, including the
definitions currently located in Sec. 119.3. Section 119.3 is
redesignated as Sec. 110.2, and all of the references in parts 119,
121 and 135 of subchapter G to the definitions formerly contained in
Sec. 119.3 were changed to Sec. 110.2. These changes to parts 110,
119, 121 and 135 are editorial in nature, and the FAA has made no
substantive changes to any of the definitions transferred to the new
part. Further, this editorial change will have no impact on the
applicability of the definitions contained in 14 CFR part 1 to
subchapter G, unless otherwise specified.
Additionally, the FAA proposes to eliminate the outdated reference
to the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) in 14 CFR 129.1(a)(1). This
revision is necessary since the CAB no longer exists, and all economic
authority is now granted by the Department of Transportation (DOT).
Currently, Sec. 129.11(a) requires foreign air carriers to comply
with ICAO standards and recommended practices in part 1 of Annex 6 of
the Chicago Convention; however, the Chicago Convention requires
compliance with ICAO standards only. By amending Sec. 129.11(a) to
remove the incorrect reference to ``recommended practices,'' the
proposed rule would clarify the international standards applicable to
foreign air carriers operating within the United States.
In 2007, FAA chartered the Part 129 Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(ARC) to provide advice, guidance and recommendations on comprehensive
changes to part 129. This proposed rule does not address the ARC's
recommendations. The FAA will consider those recommendations in a
future rulemaking.
To fulfill its oversight responsibilities, the FAA issues
operations specifications to foreign air carriers and foreign persons
to ensure a common understanding of the scope of their operations.
Operations specifications describe: (1) The scope of a foreign air
carrier's operations into the United States, including any applicable
authorizations and limitations; and (2) Maintenance responsibility for
U.S.-registered aircraft operated by foreign air carriers and foreign
persons within or outside the United States. The foreign civil aviation
authority is responsible for the certification and the continuing
oversight of the air carrier or foreign person's operations in
accordance with applicable ICAO standards.
The following table summarizes the proposed changes to existing
provisions of parts 119 and 129, identifies new provisions, and
references the relevant ICAO standard implemented in the rule, if
applicable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing part 119 Proposed new part 110
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions: Definitions applicable Definitions: The proposal would
to part 129 are currently included remove definitions from subchapter
in part 119, subchapter G. Since G of part 119 and include them in
part 119 applies to certification a new part 110.
requirements for part 135 and 121
operators, there is potential
confusion concerning whether
subchapter G applies to part 129.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing part 129 Proposed part 129 changes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ops Specs--Amendment, suspension or Ops Specs--Amendment, suspension or
termination: Current regulations termination: The proposal would
do not provide for the amendment, provide a legal basis for the
suspension, or termination of amendment, suspension, or
Operations Specifications. termination of Operations
Information is currently in the Specifications.
Inspector Guidance.
Application process: The Application process: The proposal
application process and would remove outdated portions of
requirements are outdated and Appendix A and place general
impose an unnecessary burden on requirements in the new Sec.
the operator and the FAA--No 129.7(a). Specific application
safety value (e.g., Provide names, processes will be contained in
license type and class held by Inspector Guidance for easy
each flight crewmember to include updating. In addition, the
en route training--Lufthansa proposal would clarify and
employs numerous airmen that standardize the rules for
change constantly). applications by foreign air
carriers and foreign persons for
operations specifications issued
under 14 CFR part 129.
Appeal process for foreign Appeal process for foreign
operators: There is no formal operators: The proposal would
administrative process for a provide an administrative appeals
foreign operator to appeal a process allowing foreign operators
decision to amend, suspend or and foreign persons to submit a
terminate its operations petition for reconsideration to
specifications. the Director, Flight Standards
Service before seeking judicial
review under 49 USC 46110.
Chicago Convention: There is no Chicago Convention: The proposed
regulatory provision for the rule allows the FAA to recognize
recognition of Article 83bis of crew licenses and/or airworthiness
the Chicago Convention. However, certificates issued or validated
current FAA guidance contains this by a State of the Operator under
information. (Note: Article 83bis agreements whereby the State of
allows the transfer of certain Registry of an aircraft transfers
functions and duties from the certain oversight functions to the
State of Registry to the State of State of the Operator in
the Operator under an agreement accordance with Article 83bis of
between the States concerned.) the Chicago Convention.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposal contains the following new information collection
requirements. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. section 3507(d)), the FAA has submitted the information
requirements associated with this proposal to the Office of Management
and Budget for its review.
Title: Part 129 Operations Specifications.
Summary: This proposed rule would clarify and standardize the rules
for applications by foreign air carriers and foreign persons for
operations specifications issued under 14 CFR part 129 and establish
new standards for
[[Page 25131]]
amendment, suspension and termination of those operations
specifications. The proposed rule would also apply to foreign persons
operating U.S. registered aircraft in common carriage solely outside
the United States. This action is necessary to update the process for
issuing operations specifications, and it will establish a regulatory
basis for current practices, such as amending, terminating or
suspending operations specifications.
Use of: This proposal would support the information needs of the
FAA in order to maintain an adequate level of safety oversight.
Respondents (including number of): The likely respondents to this
proposed information requirement are potential new applicants for
operations specifications. The average number of respondents is
approximately twenty-five each year.
Frequency: The FAA estimates five Flight Standards District Offices
(FSDOs) will receive approximately five applications each per year.
Annual Burden Estimate: This proposal would result in an annual
recordkeeping and reporting burden as follows: 75 hours annually.
The agency is soliciting comments to--
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of collecting information on those who are
to respond, including by using appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Individuals and organizations may send comments on the information
collection requirement by August 5, 2010, and should direct them to the
address listed in the Addresses section at the end of this preamble.
Comments also should be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk
Officer for FAA, New Executive Building, Room 10202, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20053.
According to the 1995 amendments to the Paperwork Reduction Act (5
CFR 1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not collect or sponsor the
collection of information, nor may it impose an information collection
requirement unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control number for this information collection will be
published in the Federal Register, after the Office of Management and
Budget approves it.
IV. International Compatibility
Consistent with U.S. obligations under the Chicago Convention, it
is the FAA's policy to comply with ICAO standards to the maximum extent
practicable. The proposed amendments will allow the FAA to carry out
its obligations under the Chicago Convention by providing for the
recognition of the validity of certificates of airworthiness and crew
licenses issued or validated by a State of the Operator in accordance
with Article 83bis of the Chicago Convention. Additionally, the
provisions relating to the issuance of operations specifications are
consistent with the ICAO standard for issuing operations specifications
to operators conducting international air transportation.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) obtained competence from
the European Parliament to regulate third country operators of aircraft
engaged in commercial operations into, within or out of the European
Community (EC) in 2008. Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 provides competence
to EASA to issue and renew authorizations for third country operators
and to amend, limit, suspend or revoke the relevant authorization. The
FAA will continue to coordinate with EASA on methods to streamline the
operations specifications process, as appropriate.
V. Regulatory Evaluation, Regulatory Flexibility Determination,
International Trade Impact Assessment, and Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Proposed changes to Federal Regulations must undergo several
economic analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs each Federal
agency to propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its
costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354)
requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes
on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39)
prohibits agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing
U.S. standards, the Trade Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where appropriate, use them as the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of
the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that
include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State,
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by private sector,
of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year
of 1995).
For regulations with an expected minimal impact, the above-
specified analyses are not required. The Department of Transportation
Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and procedures for simplification,
analysis, and review of regulations. If it is determined that the
expected impact is so minimal that the proposal does not warrant a full
evaluation, a statement to that effect and the basis for it is included
in proposed regulation.
This NPRM will have minimal economic impact because it does not
propose to significantly change the rules regarding FAA's obligation
for safety oversight of foreign air carriers and foreign persons under
the Chicago Convention, but actually incorporates ICAO standards for
acceptance of airworthiness certificates and crewmember licenses under
Article 83bis of the Chicago Convention. This proposed rule also
standardizes and clarifies the operations specification process.
Accordingly, the FAA has determined as a result of the removal of
outdated requirements in Appendix A, there may be a reduction in costs
for foreign air carriers or persons who will need to apply for
operations specifications. Due to streamlining and clarification of the
application process, there may be a decrease in costs to foreign air
carriers or persons. In addition, there will be some benefits to
foreign air carriers and foreign persons by creating an administrative
appeals process. The FAA requests comments from the public on the costs
and benefits of this proposal, and the resulting determination that the
proposals within the NPRM will have minimal economic impact.
Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals
[[Page 25132]]
and to explain the rationale for their actions to assure that such
proposals are given serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide
range of small entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a large number of small entities.
If the agency determines that it will, the agency must prepare an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so
certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The
certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for
this determination, and the reasoning should be clear.
This proposed rule would clarify and standardize the rules for
applications by foreign air carriers and foreign persons for operations
specifications issued under 14 CFR part 129 and establish new standards
for amendment, suspension and termination of operations specifications
by incorporating current policies and procedures into the regulations.
The proposed rule applies only to foreign air carriers and operations
of U.S.-registered aircraft in common carriage solely outside the
United States. Domestic operators are not impacted by this proposed
rule. This proposed rule merely revises and clarifies FAA operations
specifications application procedures; the expected outcome will not
increase cost to any United States small entity. Therefore, the FAA
certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The purpose of
this proposed rule is to ensure the safety of the American public, and
it does not exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The proposed
rule considers and incorporates an international standard promulgated
pursuant to the Chicago Convention and is consistent with current ICAO
standards. The FAA has assessed the potential effect of this proposed
rule and has determined that it will impose minimal costs on
international entities and may provide cost-savings to these entities
and thus have a neutral trade impact.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a
mandate is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA
currently uses an inflation-adjusted value of $143.1 million in lieu of
$100 million.
This NPRM does not contain such a mandate. Therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
VI. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We determined that this
action would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, and, therefore, does not have federalism implications.
VII. Regulations Affecting Intrastate Aviation in Alaska
Section 1205 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 1996 (110 Stat.
3213) requires the Administrator, when modifying regulations in title
14 CFR in a manner affecting intrastate aviation in Alaska, to consider
the extent to which Alaska is not served by transportation modes other
than aviation, and to establish appropriate regulatory distinctions.
Because this proposed rule would apply to the application, amendment,
suspension and termination of operations specifications of foreign air
carriers that operate into the United States, the rule should not
affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
VIII. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this proposed rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in paragraph 312d and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
IX. Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution,
or Use
The FAA has analyzed this NPRM under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). It has determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under the executive order, and it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
X. Additional Information
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The FAA also
invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. The FAA asks that you send two copies of
written comments.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also review the docket using the
Internet at the web address in the ADDRESSES section.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy of rulemaking documents using the
Internet by--
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies web page at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
[[Page 25133]]
3. Accessing the Government Printing Office's web page at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680. Make
sure to identify the docket number, notice number, or amendment number
of this rulemaking.
You may access all documents the FAA considered in developing this
proposed rule, including economic analyses and technical reports, from
the internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal referenced in the
paragraph above.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 110
Administrative practice and procedure, air carriers, aircraft,
aviation safety, charter flights, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 119
Administrative practice and procedure, air carriers, aircraft,
aviation safety, charter flights, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 121
Air carriers, aircraft, airmen, alcohol abuse, aviation safety,
charter flight, drug abuse, drug testing, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, safety, transportation.
14 CFR Part 129
Air carriers, aircraft, aviation safety, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, security measures, smoking.
14 CFR Part 135
Air taxis, aircraft, airmen, alcohol abuse, aviation safety, drug
abuse, drug testing, reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
The Proposed Amendments
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
1. Add part 110 to read as follows:
PART 110--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Sec.
110.1 Applicability.
110.2 Definitions.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1153, 40101, 40102, 40103, 40113,
44105, 44106, 44111, 44701-44717, 44722, 44901, 44903, 44904, 44906,
44912, 44914, 44936, 44938, 46103, 46105.
Sec. 110.1 Applicability.
This part governs all operations conducted under subchapter G of
this chapter.
Sec. 110.2 Definitions.
For the purpose of this subchapter, the term--
All-cargo operation means any operation for compensation or hire
that is other than a passenger-carrying operation or, if passengers are
carried, they are only those specified in Sec. Sec. 121.583(a) or
135.85 of this chapter.
Certificate-holding district office means the Flight Standards
District Office that has responsibility for administering the
certificate and is charged with the overall inspection of the
certificate holder's operations.
Commercial air tour means a flight conducted for compensation or
hire in an airplane or helicopter where a purpose of the flight is
sightseeing. The FAA may consider the following factors in determining
whether a flight is a commercial air tour:
(1) Whether there was a holding out to the public of willingness to
conduct a sightseeing flight for compensation or hire;
(2) Whether the person offering the flight provided a narrative
that referred to areas or points of interest on the surface below the
route of the flight;
(3) The area of operation;
(4) How often the person offering the flight conducts such flights;
(5) The route of flight;
(6) The inclusion of sightseeing flights as part of any travel
arrangement package;
(7) Whether the flight in question would have been canceled based
on poor visibility of the surface below the route of the flight; and
(8) Any other factors that the FAA considers appropriate.
Commuter operation means any scheduled operation conducted by any
person operating one of the following types of aircraft with a
frequency of operations of at least five round trips per week on at
least one route between two or more points according to the published
flight schedules:
(1) Airplanes, other than turbojet powered airplanes, having a
maximum passenger-seat configuration of 9 seats or less, excluding each
crewmember seat, and a maximum payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or
less; or
(2) Rotorcraft.
Direct air carrier means a person who provides or offers to provide
air transportation and who has control over the operational functions
performed in providing that transportation.
DOD commercial air carrier evaluator means a qualified Air Mobility
Command, Survey and Analysis Office (AMC/DOB) cockpit evaluator
performing the duties specified in Public Law 99-661 when the evaluator
is flying on an air carrier that is contracted or pursuing a contract
with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
Domestic operation means any scheduled operation conducted by any
person operating any airplane described in paragraph (1) of this
definition at locations described in paragraph (2) of this definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Turbojet-powered airplanes;
(ii) Airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 9
passenger seats, excluding each crewmember seat; or
(iii) Airplanes having a payload capacity of more than 7,500
pounds.
(2) Locations:
(i) Between any points within the 48 contiguous States of the
United States or the District of Columbia; or
(ii) Operations solely within the 48 contiguous States of the
United States or the District of Columbia; or
(iii) Operations entirely within any State, territory, or
possession of the United States; or
(iv) When specifically authorized by the Administrator, operations
between any point within the 48 contiguous States of the United States
or the District of Columbia and any specifically authorized point
located outside the 48 contiguous States of the United States or the
District of Columbia.
Empty weight means the weight of the airframe, engines, propellers,
rotors, and fixed equipment. Empty weight excludes the weight of the
crew and payload, but includes the weight of all fixed ballast,
unusable fuel supply, undrainable oil, total quantity of engine
coolant, and total quantity of hydraulic fluid.
Flag operation means any scheduled operation conducted by any
person operating any airplane described in paragraph (1) of this
definition at the locations described in paragraph (2) of this
definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Turbojet-powered airplanes;
(ii) Airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 9
passenger seats, excluding each crewmember seat; or
(iii) Airplanes having a payload capacity of more than 7,500
pounds.
(2) Locations:
(i) Between any point within the State of Alaska or the State of
Hawaii or any territory or possession of the United States and any
point outside the State of Alaska or the State of Hawaii or any
territory or possession of the United States, respectively; or
[[Page 25134]]
(ii) Between any point within the 48 contiguous States of the
United States or the District of Columbia and any point outside the 48
contiguous States of the United States and the District of Columbia.
(iii) Between any point outside the U.S. and another point outside
the U.S.
Justifiable aircraft equipment means any equipment necessary for
the operation of the aircraft. It does not include equipment or ballast
specifically installed, permanently or otherwise, for the purpose of
altering the empty weight of an aircraft to meet the maximum payload
capacity.
Kind of operation means one of the various operations a certificate
holder is authorized to conduct, as specified in its operations
specifications, i.e., domestic, flag, supplemental, commuter, or on-
demand operations.
Maximum payload capacity means:
(1) For an aircraft for which a maximum zero fuel weight is
prescribed in FAA technical specifications, the maximum zero fuel
weight, less empty weight, less all justifiable aircraft equipment, and
less the operating load (consisting of minimum flightcrew, foods and
beverages, and supplies and equipment related to foods and beverages,
but not including disposable fuel or oil).
(2) For all other aircraft, the maximum certificated takeoff weight
of an aircraft, less the empty weight, less all justifiable aircraft
equipment, and less the operating load (consisting of minimum fuel
load, oil, and flightcrew). The allowance for the weight of the crew,
oil, and fuel is as follows:
(i) Crew--for each crewmember required by the Federal Aviation
Regulations--
(A) For male flight crewmembers--180 pounds.
(B) For female flight crewmembers--140 pounds.
(C) For male flight attendants--180 pounds.
(D) For female flight attendants--130 pounds.
(E) For flight attendants not identified by gender--140 pounds.
(ii) Oil--350 pounds or the oil capacity as specified on the Type
Certificate Data Sheet.
(iii) Fuel--the minimum weight of fuel required by the applicable
Federal Aviation Regulations for a flight between domestic points 174
nautical miles apart under VFR weather conditions that does not involve
extended overwater operations.
Maximum zero fuel weight means the maximum permissible weight of an
aircraft with no disposable fuel or oil. The zero fuel weight figure
may be found in either the aircraft type certificate data sheet, the
approved Aircraft Flight Manual, or both.
Noncommon carriage means an aircraft operation for compensation or
hire that does not involve a holding out to others.
On-demand operation means any operation for compensation or hire
that is one of the following:
(1) Passenger-carrying operations conducted as a public charter
under part 380 of this chapter or any operations in which the departure
time, departure location, and arrival location are specifically
negotiated with the customer or the customer's representative that are
any of the following types of operations:
(i) Common carriage operations conducted with airplanes, including
turbojet-powered airplanes, having a passenger-seat configuration of 30
seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity
of 7,500 pounds or less, except that operations using a specific
airplane that is also used in domestic or flag operations and that is
so listed in the operations specifications as required by Sec.
119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those operations are considered
supplemental operations;
(ii) Noncommon or private carriage operations conducted with
airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of less than 20 seats,
excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of less than
6,000 pounds; or
(iii) Any rotorcraft operation.
(2) Scheduled passenger-carrying operations conducted with one of
the following types of aircraft with a frequency of operations of less
than five round trips per week on at least one route between two or
more points according to the published flight schedules:
(i) Airplanes, other than turbojet powered airplanes, having a
maximum passenger-seat configuration of 9 seats or less, excluding each
crewmember seat, and a maximum payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or
less; or
(ii) Rotorcraft.
(3) All-cargo operations conducted with airplanes having a payload
capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, or with rotorcraft.
Passenger-carrying operation means any aircraft operation carrying
any person, unless the only persons on the aircraft are those
identified in Sec. Sec. 121.583(a) or 135.85 of this chapter, as
applicable. An aircraft used in a passenger-carrying operation may also
carry cargo or mail in addition to passengers.
Principal base of operations means the primary operating location
of a certificate holder as established by the certificate holder.
Provisional airport means an airport approved by the Administrator
for use by a certificate holder for the purpose of providing service to
a community when the regular airport used by the certificate holder is
not available.
Regular airport means an airport used by a certificate holder in
scheduled operations and listed in its operations specifications.
Scheduled operation means any common carriage passenger-carrying
operation for compensation or hire conducted by an air carrier or
commercial operator for which the certificate holder or its
representative offers in advance the departure location, departure
time, and arrival location. It does not include any passenger-carrying
operation that is conducted as a public charter operation under part
380 of this chapter.
Supplemental operation means any common carriage operation for
compensation or hire conducted with any airplane described in paragraph
(1) of this definition that is a type of operation described in
paragraph (2) of this definition:
(1) Airplanes:
(i) Airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 30
seats, excluding each crewmember seat;
(ii) Airplanes having a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds;
or
(iii) Each propeller-powered airplane having a passenger-seat
configuration of more than 9 seats and less than 31 seats, excluding
each crewmember seat, that is also used in domestic or flag operations
and that is so listed in the operations specifications as required by
Sec. 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those operations; or
(iv) Each turbojet powered airplane having a passenger seat
configuration of 1 or more and less than 31 seats, excluding each
crewmember seat, that is also used in domestic or flag operations and
that is so listed in the operations specifications as required by Sec.
119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those operations.
(2) Types of operation:
(i) Operations for which the departure time, departure location,
and arrival location are specifically negotiated with the customer or
the customer's representative;
(ii) All-cargo operations; or
(iii) Passenger-carrying public charter operations conducted under
part 380 of this chapter.
Wet lease means any leasing arrangement whereby a person agrees to
[[Page 25135]]
provide an entire aircraft and at least one crewmember. A wet lease
does not include a code-sharing arrangement.
When common carriage is not involved or operations not involving
common carriage means any of the following:
(1) Noncommon carriage.
(2) Operations in which persons or cargo are transported without
compensation or hire.
(3) Operations not involving the transportation of persons or
cargo.
(4) Private carriage.
Years in service means the calendar time elapsed since an aircraft
was issued its first U.S. or first foreign airworthiness certificate.
PART 119--CERTIFICATION: AIR CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATORS
2. The authority citation for part 119 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1153, 40101, 40102, 40103, 40113,
44105, 44106, 44111, 44701-44717, 44722, 44901, 44903, 44904, 44906,
44912, 44914, 44936, 44938, 46103, 46105.
Sec. 119.3 [Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve Sec. 119.3.
Sec. 119.51 [Amended]
4. Amend Sec. 119.51(c)(1)(i) by removing the citation ``Sec.
119.3'' and adding the citation ``Sec. 110.2'' in its place.
Sec. 119.53 [Amended]
5. Amend Sec. 119.53(e) by removing the citation ``Sec. 119.3''
and adding the citation ``Sec. 110.2'' in its place.
PART 121--CERTIFICATION: AIR CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATORS
6. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40119, 41706, 44101,
44701, 44702, 44705, 44709, 44710, 44711, 44713, 44716, 44717,
44722, 46105.
Sec. 121.313 [Amended]
7. Amend Sec. 121.313 by removing the citation ``Sec. 119.3'' and
adding the citation ``Sec. 110.2'' in its place.
Sec. 121.582 [Amended]
8. Amend Sec. 121.582 by removing the citation ``Sec. 119.3'' and
adding the citation ``Sec. 110.2'' in its place.
PART 129--OPERATIONS: FOREIGN AIR CARRIERS AND FOREIGN OPERATORS OF
U.S.-REGISTERED AIRCRAFT ENGAGED IN COMMON CARRIAGE
9. The authority citation for part 129 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1372, 40113, 40119, 44101, 44701-44702,
44705, 44709-44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722, 44901-44904, 44906,
44912, 46105, Pub. L. 107-71 sec, 104.
10. Amend Sec. 129.1 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 129.1 Applicability and definitions.
(a) * * *
(1) A permit issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation under
49 U.S.C. 41301 through 41306, or
(2) Other appropriate economic or exemption authority issued by the
U.S. Department of Transportation.
(b) Operations of U.S.-registered aircraft solely outside the
United States.
In addition to the operations specified under paragraph (a) of this
section, Sec. Sec. 129.5, 129.7, 129.9, 129.11, 129.14, 129.20 and 24,
and subpart B of this part also apply to operations of U.S.-registered
aircraft operated solely outside the United States in common carriage
by a foreign person or foreign air carrier.
* * * * *
11. Add Sec. 129.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 129.5 Operations specifications.
(a) Each foreign air carrier conducting operations within the
United States, and each foreign air carrier or foreign person operating
U.S. registered aircraft solely outside the United States in common
carriage must conduct its operations in accordance with operations
specifications issued by the Administrator under this part.
(b) Each foreign air carrier conducting operations within the
United States must conduct its operations in accordance with the
Standards contained in Annex 1 (Personnel Licensing), Annex 6
(Operation of Aircraft), Part I (International Commercial Air
Transport--Aeroplanes) or Part III (International Operations--
Helicopters), as appropriate, and in Annex 8 (Airworthiness of
Aircraft) to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
(c) No foreign air carrier may operate to or from locations within
the United States without, or in violation of, appropriate operations
specifications.
(d) No foreign air carrier or foreign person shall operate U.S.
registered aircraft solely outside the United States in common carriage
without, or in violation of, appropriate operations specifications.
(e) Each foreign air carrier must keep each of its employees and
other persons used in its operations informed of the provisions of its
operations specifications that apply to that employee's or person's
duties and responsibilities.
(f) Operations specifications issued under this part are effective
until--
(1) The foreign air carrier or foreign person surrenders them to
the FAA;
(2) The Administrator suspends or terminates the operations
specifications; or
(3) The operations specifications are amended as provided in Sec.
129.11.
(g) Within 30 days after a foreign air carrier or foreign person
terminates operations under part 129 of this subchapter, the operations
specifications must be surrendered by the foreign air carrier or
foreign person to the responsible Flight Standards District Office.
(h) No person operating under this part may operate or list on its
operations specifications any airplane listed on operations
specifications issued under part 125 of this chapter.
12. Add Sec. 129.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 129.7 Application, issuance, or denial of operations
specifications.
(a) A foreign air carrier or foreign person applying to the FAA for
operations specifications under this part must submit an application--
(1) In a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator; and
(2) At least 90 days before the intended date of operation.
(b) An authorized officer or employee of the applicant, having
knowledge of the matters stated in the application, must sign the
application and certify in writing that the statements in the
application are true. The application must include two copies of the
appropriate written authority issued to that officer or employee by the
applicant.
(c) A foreign applicant may be issued operations specifications, if
after review, the Administrator finds the applicant--
(1) Meets the applicable requirements of this part;
(2) Holds the economic or exemption authority required by the
Department of Transportation, applicable to the operations to be
conducted;
(3) Complies with the applicable security requirements of 49 CFR
chapter XII;
(4) Is properly and adequately equipped to conduct the operations
described in the operations specifications; and
[[Page 25136]]
(5) Holds a valid air operator certificate issued by the State of
the Operator.
(d) An application may be denied if the Administrator finds that
the applicant is not properly or adequately equipped to conduct the
operations to be described in the operations specifications.
13. Add Sec. 129.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 129.9 Contents of operations specifications.
(a) The contents of operations specifications issued to a foreign
air carrier conducting operations within the United States under Sec.
129.1(a) shall include:
(1) The specific location and mailing address of the applicant's
principal place of business in the State of the Operator and, if
different, the address that will serve as the primary point of contact
for correspondence between the FAA and the foreign air carrier;
(2) The designation of an agent for service within the United
States, including the agent's full name and office address or usual
place of residence;
(3) The certificate number and validity of the foreign air
carrier's Air Operator Certificate issued by the State of the Operator;
(4) Each regular and alternate airport to be used in scheduled
operations;
(5) The type of aircraft and registration markings of each
aircraft;
(6) The approved maintenance program and minimum equipment lists
for United States registered aircraft authorized for use; and
(7) Any other item the Administrator determines is necessary.
(b) The contents of operations specifications issued to a foreign