WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, 25200-25202 [2010-10878]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
25200
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
Agriculture; Room 2457, Waterfront
Centre; 800 9th Street, SW.;
Washington, DC 20024.
Instructions:
All submissions received must
include the agency name and the Docket
Number NIFA–2010–0001. All
comments received will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Terri Joya, (202) 401–1761 (phone),
(202) 401–1782 (fax), or
tjoya@nifa.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional Meeting and Comment
Procedures
Persons wishing to present oral
comments at the Wednesday, June 2,
2010 meeting are requested to preregister by contacting Ms. Terri Joya at
(202) 401–1761, by fax at (202) 401–
1782 or by e-mail to
tjoya@nifa.usda.gov. Participants may
reserve one 5-minute comment period.
More time may be available, depending
on the number of people wishing to
make a presentation and the time
needed for questions following
presentations. Reservations will be
confirmed on a first-come, first-served
basis. All other attendees may register at
the meeting. Written comments may
also be submitted for the record at the
meeting. All comments must be
received by close of business June 7,
2010 to be considered. All comments
and the official transcript of the
meeting, when they become available,
may be reviewed on the NIFA Web page
for six months. Participants who require
a sign language interpreter or other
special accommodations should contact
Ms. Joya as directed above.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background and Purpose
Section 7406 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110–246) amended subsection
2(b) of the Competitive, Special, and
Facilities Research Grant Act (7 U.S.C.
450i(b)) authorizing the Secretary of
Agriculture to establish a new
competitive grant program to provide
funding for fundamental and applied
research, extension, and education to
address food and agricultural sciences.
Subject to the availability of
appropriations to carry out this
program, the Secretary may award
grants to State agricultural experiment
stations; colleges and universities;
university research foundations; other
research institutions and organizations;
Federal agencies; national laboratories;
private organizations or corporations;
individuals; or any group consisting of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
two or more of the aforementioned
entities. Grants shall be awarded to
address priorities in United States
agriculture in the following areas: (A)
Plant health and production and plant
products; (B) Animal health and
production and animal products; (C)
Food safety, nutrition, and health; (D)
Renewable energy, natural resources,
and environment; (E) Agriculture
systems and technology; and (F)
Agriculture economics and rural
communities. To the maximum extent
practicable, NIFA, in coordination with
the Under Secretary for Research,
Education, and Economics (REE), will
make awards for high priority research,
education, and extension, taking into
consideration, when available, the
determinations made by the National
Agricultural Research, Extension,
Education, and Economics Advisory
Board. The authority to carry out this
program has been delegated to NIFA
through the Undersecretary for REE.
NIFA is holding a public meeting to
obtain comments to consider in
developing the Fiscal Year 2011
solicitations for the AFRI competitive
grants program. The meeting is open to
the public. Written comments and
suggestions on issues that may be
considered in the meeting may be
submitted to the NIFA Docket Clerk at
the address above.
Summary of Agriculture and Food
Research Initiative
The program authorizes $700 million
in grants for FY 2008–12, of which the
Secretary may retain no more than 4%
for administrative costs. Funds will be
available for obligation for a two-year
period beginning in the fiscal year for
which funds are first made available.
Grants will be awarded on the basis of
merit, quality, and relevance and may
have terms of up to 10 years.
Of the AFRI funds allocated to
research activities, section 7406 directs
60 percent toward grants for
fundamental (or basic) research, and 40
percent toward applied research. Of the
AFRI funds allocated to fundamental
research, not less than 30 percent of
AFRI grants will be directed toward
research by multidisciplinary teams. In
addition, the law specifies that of the
total amount appropriated for AFRI, not
less than 30 percent is to be used for
integrated programs.
Implementation Plans
NIFA plans to consider stakeholder
input received from this public meeting
as well as other written comments in
developing the Fiscal Year 2011
solicitations for this program.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Done at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
May 2010.
Meryl Broussard,
Interim Deputy Director, National Institute
of Food and Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2010–10690 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger
Levels
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and
trigger levels for safeguard measures
provided for in the World Trade
Organization (WTO) Agreement on
Agriculture.
SUMMARY: This notice lists the updated
quantity trigger levels for products
which may be subject to additional
import duties under the safeguard
provisions of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture. This notice also includes
the relevant period applicable for the
trigger levels on each of the listed
products.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Safeguard Staff, Import Policies and
Export Reporting Division, Office of
Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Stop 1021, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250–1021; or by
telephone at (202) 720–0638, or by
e-mail at itspd@fas.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5
of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture
provides that additional import duties
may be imposed on imports of products
subject to tariffication as a result of the
Uruguay Round, if certain conditions
are met. The agreement permits
additional duties to be charged if the
price of an individual shipment of
imported products falls below the
average price for similar goods imported
during the years 1986–88 by a specified
percentage. It also permits additional
duties to be imposed if the volume of
imports of an article exceeds the average
of the most recent 3 years for which data
are available by 5, 10, or 25 percent,
depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed
on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made
during the Uruguay Round negotiations,
and only one type of safeguard, price or
quantity, may be applied at any given
time to an article.
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
25201
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the
Federal Register information regarding
the price and quantity safeguards,
including the quantity trigger levels,
which must be updated annually based
upon import levels during the most
recent 3 years. The President delegated
this duty to the Secretary of Agriculture
in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
dated December 23, 1994, 60 FR 1005
(Jan. 4, 1995). The Secretary of
Agriculture further delegated the duty to
the Administrator of the Foreign
Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43(a)(2)
(2007)). The Annex to this notice
contains the updated quantity trigger
levels.
Additional information on the
products subject to safeguards and the
additional duties which may apply can
be found in subchapter IV of Chapter 99
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (2010) and in the
Secretary of Agriculture’s Notice of
Uruguay Round Agricultural Safeguard
Trigger Levels, published in the Federal
Register at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Notice: As provided in section 405 of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
consistent with Article 5 of the
Agreement on Agriculture, the safeguard
quantity trigger levels previously
notified are superceded by the levels
indicated in the Annex to this notice.
The definitions of these products were
provided in the Notice of Uruguay
Round Agricultural Safeguard Action
published in the Federal Register, at 60
FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Issued at Washington, DC, April 29, 2010.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
ANNEX—QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER
Product
Trigger level
Beef .........................................................................................
Mutton .....................................................................................
Cream .....................................................................................
Evaporated or Condensed Milk ..............................................
Nonfat Dry Milk .......................................................................
Dried Whole Milk ....................................................................
Dried Cream ...........................................................................
Dried Whey/Buttermilk ............................................................
Butter ......................................................................................
Butter Oil and Butter Substitutes ............................................
Dairy Mixtures .........................................................................
Blue Cheese ...........................................................................
Cheddar Cheese .....................................................................
American-Type Cheese ..........................................................
Edam/Gouda Cheese .............................................................
Italian-Type Cheese ................................................................
Swiss Cheese with Eye Formation .........................................
Gruyere Process Cheese .......................................................
Lowfat Cheese ........................................................................
NSPF Cheese .........................................................................
Peanuts ...................................................................................
270,519 mt ............................
4,503 mt ................................
1,165,099 liters ......................
3,536,146 kilograms ..............
393,499 kilograms .................
2,397,493 kilograms ..............
27,330 kilograms ...................
30,238 kilograms ...................
7,311,166 kilograms ..............
6,985,605 kilograms ..............
43,535,705 kilograms ............
4,846,863 kilograms ..............
12,272,710 kilograms ............
7,093,001 kilograms ..............
7,019,833 kilograms ..............
22,355,614 kilograms ............
28,867,494 kilograms ............
4,398,721 kilograms ..............
848,545 kilograms .................
46,400,350 kilograms ............
15,172 mt ..............................
18,176 mt ..............................
4,280 mt ................................
1,407,556 mt .........................
1,142,815 mt .........................
191,180 mt ............................
176,800 mt ............................
107 mt ...................................
134 mt ...................................
578 mt ...................................
277 mt ...................................
15,617 mt ..............................
15,083 mt ..............................
1,249 mt ................................
1,054 mt ................................
10,081,708 kilograms ............
226,647 kilograms .................
10,530 kilograms ...................
315 mt ...................................
383 mt ...................................
176 mt ...................................
280 mt ...................................
2,869,565 liters ......................
32,419 kilograms ...................
699,482 kilograms .................
591,350 kilograms .................
0 kilograms ............................
0 kilograms ............................
688,341 kilograms .................
149,148 kilograms .................
3,656,233 kilograms ..............
2,017,042 kilograms ..............
395,745 kilograms .................
432,133 kilograms .................
Peanut Butter/Paste ................................................................
Raw Cane Sugar ....................................................................
Refined Sugar and Syrups .....................................................
Blended Syrups ......................................................................
Articles Over 65% Sugar ........................................................
Articles Over 10% Sugar ........................................................
Sweetened Cocoa Powder .....................................................
Chocolate Crumb ....................................................................
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb ........................................................
Infant Formula Containing Oligosaccharides .........................
Mixes and Doughs ..................................................................
Mixed Condiments and Seasonings .......................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Ice Cream ...............................................................................
Animal Feed Containing Milk ..................................................
Short Staple Cotton ................................................................
Harsh or Rough Cotton ..........................................................
Medium Staple Cotton ............................................................
Extra Long Staple Cotton .......................................................
Cotton Waste ..........................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Period
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
September 20, 2010 to September 19, 2011.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
September 20, 2010 to September 19, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
25202
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
ANNEX—QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER—Continued
Product
Trigger level
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun .................................................
3,995 kilograms .....................
31,338 kilograms ...................
[FR Doc. 2010–10878 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Orion Air, S.L. and Syrian Pearl
Airlines; Order Renewing Order
Temporarily Denying Export Privileges
Orion Air, S.L., Canada Real de Merinas,
7 Edificio 5, 3’A, Eissenhower
business center, 28042 Madrid, Spain
Ad. de las Cortes Valencianas no 37,
Esc.A Puerta 45 46015 Valencia,
Spain
Syrian Pearl Airlines, Damascus
International Airport, Damascus,
Syria, Respondents
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the
Export Administration Regulations, 15
CFR parts 730–774 (2009) (‘‘EAR’’ or the
‘‘Regulations’’), I hereby grant the
request of the Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’) to renew for 180 days
the Order Temporarily Denying the
Export Privileges of Respondents Orion
Air, S.L. (‘‘Orion Air’’) and Syrian Pearl
Airlines (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’),
as I find that renewal of the temporary
denial order (‘‘TDO’’ or the ‘‘Order’’) is
necessary in the public interest to
prevent an imminent violation of the
EAR.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Procedural History
On May 7, 2009, then-Acting
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement Kevin Delli-Colli
signed an Order Temporarily Denying
the Export Privileges of the Respondents
for 180 days on the grounds that its
issuance was necessary in the public
interest to prevent an imminent
violation of the Regulations. Pursuant to
Section 766.24(a), the TDO was issued
ex parte and was effective upon
issuance. Copies of the TDO were sent
to each Respondent in accordance with
section 766.5 of the Regulations and the
Order was published in the Federal
Register on May 26, 2009.1 Thereafter,
on November 2, 2009, Acting Assistant
Secretary Delli-Colli issued an Order
renewing the TDO for an additional 180
1 74
FR 24,786.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Period
September 11, 2009 to September 10, 2010.
September 11, 2010 to September 10, 2011.
days.2 The current Order would expire
on May 1, 2010, unless renewed in
accordance with section 766.24 of the
Regulations.
On April 9, 2010, BIS, through its
Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’),
filed a written request for renewal of the
TDO against the Respondents for an
additional 180 days and served a copy
of its request on the Respondents in
accordance with section 766.5 of the
Regulations. No opposition to renewal
of the TDO has been received from
either Orion Air or Syrian Pearl
Airlines.
II. Discussion
A. Legal Standard
Pursuant to section 766.24(d)(3) of the
EAR, the sole issue to be considered in
determining whether to continue a TDO
is whether the TDO should be renewed
to prevent an imminent violation of the
EAR, as ‘‘imminent’’ violation is defined
in section 766.24. ‘‘A violation may be
‘imminent’ either in time or in degree of
likelihood.’’ 15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). BIS
may show ‘‘either that a violation is
about to occur, or that the general
circumstances of the matter under
investigation or case under criminal or
administrative charges demonstrate a
likelihood of future violations.’’ Id. As to
the likelihood of future violations, BIS
may show that ‘‘the violation under
investigation or charges is significant,
deliberate, covert and/or likely to occur
again, rather than technical and
negligent[.]’’ Id. A ‘‘lack of information
establishing the precise time a violation
may occur does not preclude a finding
that a violation is imminent, so long as
there is sufficient reason to believe the
likelihood of a violation.’’ Id.
B. Findings
As part of its initial TDO request, BIS
presented evidence that on or about
May 1, 2009, Orion Air re-exported a
BAE 146–300 aircraft (tail number EC–
JVO) to Syria, and specifically to Syrian
Pearl Airlines, without the U.S.
Government authorization required by
General Order No. 2 of Supplement 1 to
Part 736 of the EAR. The aircraft is
subject to the Regulations because it
2 The November 2, 2009 renewal Order was
effective immediately and was published in the
Federal Register on November 9, 2009 (74 FR
57626).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contains greater than a 10-percent de
minimis amount of U.S.-origin content.
Orion Air engaged in this re-export
transaction despite having been directly
informed of the export licensing
requirements by the U.S. Government.
Moreover, Orion Air not only engaged
in this conduct after having received
actual as well as constructive notice of
the applicable license requirements, but
then sought to evade the Regulations
and U.S. export controls by giving the
U.S. Government false assurances that it
would put the transaction on hold due
to the U.S. Government’s concerns.
BIS also produced evidence that the
re-exported aircraft bore the livery,
colors and logos of Syrian Pearl
Airlines, a national of Syria, a Country
Group E:1 destination; was flight
capable; and under the terms of the
lease agreement was to be based in and
operated out of Syria during the lease
term. The record also shows that the reexported aircraft currently remains in
Syria under the control of Syrian Pearl
Airlines.
In addition to the unauthorized reexport described above, Acting
Assistant Secretary Delli-Colli also
concluded that additional violations
were imminent based on statements by
Orion Air to the U.S. Government in
May 2009 that Orion Air planned to reexport an additional BAE 146–300
aircraft (tail number EC–JVJ) to Syria,
and specifically to Syrian Pearl Airlines.
This second aircraft was at the time
undergoing maintenance in the United
Kingdom, and remains located there.
Moreover, the agreement between Orion
Air and Syrian Pearl Airlines involved
both aircraft. Based on my review of the
record, I find that the facts and
circumstances that led to the issuance of
the initial TDO and the November 2009
renewal Order continue to show that
renewal of the TDO for an additional
180 days is necessary and in the public
interest to prevent an imminent
violation of the EAR. Absent renewal of
the TDO, there remains a substantial
continued risk that the second aircraft
will be re-exported contrary to the
Regulations, given that, inter alia, Orion
Air acted with actual knowledge and
took deceptive and evasive action. This
finding alone would justify renewal.
There also would be a substantial risk
that, absent renewal of the TDO, the first
aircraft, which remains in Syria, would
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25200-25202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and trigger levels for safeguard
measures provided for in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement
on Agriculture.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice lists the updated quantity trigger levels for
products which may be subject to additional import duties under the
safeguard provisions of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This notice
also includes the relevant period applicable for the trigger levels on
each of the listed products.
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Safeguard Staff, Import Policies and
Export Reporting Division, Office of Trade Programs, Foreign
Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1021, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-1021; or by telephone at
(202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at itspd@fas.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture provides that additional import duties may be imposed on
imports of products subject to tariffication as a result of the Uruguay
Round, if certain conditions are met. The agreement permits additional
duties to be charged if the price of an individual shipment of imported
products falls below the average price for similar goods imported
during the years 1986-88 by a specified percentage. It also permits
additional duties to be imposed if the volume of imports of an article
exceeds the average of the most recent 3 years for which data are
available by 5, 10, or 25 percent, depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made during the Uruguay Round
negotiations, and only one type of safeguard, price or quantity, may be
applied at any given time to an article.
[[Page 25201]]
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the Federal Register information
regarding the price and quantity safeguards, including the quantity
trigger levels, which must be updated annually based upon import levels
during the most recent 3 years. The President delegated this duty to
the Secretary of Agriculture in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
dated December 23, 1994, 60 FR 1005 (Jan. 4, 1995). The Secretary of
Agriculture further delegated the duty to the Administrator of the
Foreign Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43(a)(2) (2007)). The Annex to
this notice contains the updated quantity trigger levels.
Additional information on the products subject to safeguards and
the additional duties which may apply can be found in subchapter IV of
Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(2010) and in the Secretary of Agriculture's Notice of Uruguay Round
Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, published in the Federal
Register at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Notice: As provided in section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act, consistent with Article 5 of the Agreement on Agriculture, the
safeguard quantity trigger levels previously notified are superceded by
the levels indicated in the Annex to this notice. The definitions of
these products were provided in the Notice of Uruguay Round
Agricultural Safeguard Action published in the Federal Register, at 60
FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Issued at Washington, DC, April 29, 2010.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
Annex--Quantity-Based Safeguard Trigger
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product Trigger level Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beef.......................... 270,519 mt....... January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Mutton........................ 4,503 mt......... January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Cream......................... 1,165,099 liters. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Evaporated or Condensed Milk.. 3,536,146 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Nonfat Dry Milk............... 393,499 kilograms January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Dried Whole Milk.............. 2,397,493 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Dried Cream................... 27,330 kilograms. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Dried Whey/Buttermilk......... 30,238 kilograms. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Butter........................ 7,311,166 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Butter Oil and Butter 6,985,605 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Substitutes. kilograms.
Dairy Mixtures................ 43,535,705 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Blue Cheese................... 4,846,863 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Cheddar Cheese................ 12,272,710 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
American-Type Cheese.......... 7,093,001 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Edam/Gouda Cheese............. 7,019,833 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Italian-Type Cheese........... 22,355,614 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Swiss Cheese with Eye 28,867,494 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Formation. kilograms.
Gruyere Process Cheese........ 4,398,721 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Lowfat Cheese................. 848,545 kilograms January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
NSPF Cheese................... 46,400,350 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Peanuts....................... 15,172 mt........ April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
18,176 mt........ April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011.
Peanut Butter/Paste........... 4,280 mt......... January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Raw Cane Sugar................ 1,407,556 mt..... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
1,142,815 mt..... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Refined Sugar and Syrups...... 191,180 mt....... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
176,800 mt....... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Blended Syrups................ 107 mt........... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
134 mt........... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Articles Over 65% Sugar....... 578 mt........... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
277 mt........... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Articles Over 10% Sugar....... 15,617 mt........ October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
15,083 mt........ October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Sweetened Cocoa Powder........ 1,249 mt......... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
1,054 mt......... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Chocolate Crumb............... 10,081,708 January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
kilograms.
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb........ 226,647 kilograms January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Infant Formula Containing 10,530 kilograms. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Oligosaccharides.
Mixes and Doughs.............. 315 mt........... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
383 mt........... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Mixed Condiments and 176 mt........... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Seasonings.
280 mt........... October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
Ice Cream..................... 2,869,565 liters. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Animal Feed Containing Milk... 32,419 kilograms. January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Short Staple Cotton........... 699,482 kilograms September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
591,350 kilograms September 20, 2010 to September 19, 2011.
Harsh or Rough Cotton......... 0 kilograms...... August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
0 kilograms...... August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
Medium Staple Cotton.......... 688,341 kilograms August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
149,148 kilograms August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
Extra Long Staple Cotton...... 3,656,233 August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
kilograms.
2,017,042 August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011.
kilograms.
Cotton Waste.................. 395,745 kilograms September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
432,133 kilograms September 20, 2010 to September 19, 2011.
[[Page 25202]]
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun... 3,995 kilograms.. September 11, 2009 to September 10, 2010.
31,338 kilograms. September 11, 2010 to September 10, 2011.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-10878 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
