Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection: Comments Requested, 25292-25293 [2010-10863]
Download as PDF
25292
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
publication of the notification reopening
scoping on April 29, 2010, and this
notification of postponed scoping will
be held together with comments
received during the initial scoping
period of November 13, 2008 through
January 13, 2009. No further comments
are being solicited for scoping of the
Lease Sale 220 EIS pending decision by
the Secretary of the Interior.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on the status for the Sale
220 EIS scoping, please contact Mr.
Gary D. Goeke, Chief, Environmental
Assessment Section, Leasing and
Environment (MS 5410), Minerals
Management Service, Gulf of Mexico
OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood Park
Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70123–
2394, telephone (504) 736–3233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With
respect to proposed Lease Sale 220,
MMS issued a Notice of Intent to
prepare an EIS published in the Federal
Register on November 13, 2008 (Vol. 73,
No. 220, page 67201), and included a
45-day scoping period. No scoping
meetings were announced at that time.
The MMS decided to extend the
comment period and made
announcements in a press release and
other media. On January 7, 2009, MMS
published a notice in the Federal
Register (Vol. 74, No. 4, page 727)
extending the scoping comment period
to 60 days. That comment period
expired on January 13, 2009. Scoping
had been reopened in the Federal
Register notice published on April 29,
2010 (Vol. 75, No. 82, page 22623).
Today’s notice postpones indefinitely
scoping for the Sale 220 EIS until or
unless MMS provides further
notification.
Dated: May 4, 2010.
S. Elizabeth Birnbaum,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–10981 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation No. 337–TA–689]
In the Matter of Certain Dual Access
Locks and Products Containing Same;
Notice of Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Motions for Summary
Determination of Non-Infringement and
Finding No Violation of Section 337;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
granting two motions for summary
determination of non-infringement and
no violation of section 337 issued by the
presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) on March 18, 2010, in the abovecaptioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on October 21, 2009, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, based on an amended
complaint filed on October 5, 2009, by
Safe Skies, LLC and David Tropp of
Brooklyn, New York. 74 FR 54065
(October 21, 2009). The Commission
named the following companies as
respondents: C&C Luggage
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of China;
Formosa Tai Rank Industrial Corp. of
Taiwan; Hangzhou Gema Suitcases &
Bags Co., Ltd. of China; La Pearl
Luggage and Leather Goods Co., Ltd. of
China; Hinomoto Jomae, Ltd. of Japan;
Sinox Company, Ltd. of Taiwan; Yi
Feng Manufacturing, Co., Ltd. of China;
Jin Tay Industries Co., Ltd. of Taiwan;
FULLYEAR-Brother Enterprise, Co., Ltd.
of Taiwan; Zhuhai SkyGood Tech.
Industrial Corp., Ltd. of China; Ningbo
Xianfeng Art & Craft Co., Ltd. of China;
Paloma Enterprises Co., Ltd. of Taiwan;
Tekraft Industrial Co., Ltd. of Taiwan;
Hangzhou Travelsky Co., Ltd. of China;
The Sun Lock Company Ltd. of Hong
Kong; Alloy Metal Manufactory, Ltd. of
Hong Kong; Cometform, Ltd. of England;
Design Go Ltd. of England; Franzen
International of Germany; M–Power
Lock Manufactory of Hong Kong.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain dual access locks and products
containing same that infringe claims
1–21 of U.S. Patent No. 7,021,537 and
claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent No.
7,036,728. The complaint further
alleged that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337. The complainants
requested that the Commission issue a
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
On March 18, 2010, the ALJ issued an
ID (Order No. 6) granting a motion of the
Commission investigative attorney
(‘‘IA’’) and a joint motion on behalf of 19
of the above-named respondents for
summary determination of noninfringement of all asserted claims. Only
respondent Formosa Tai Ran Industrial
Corp. did not join in the joint motion for
summary determination. On April 1,
2010, complainants filed a petition for
review of the ID. On April 8, 2010, the
IA filed an opposition to the petition for
review. On April 9, 2010, the 19
respondents filed a joint opposition to
the petition for review and a motion for
leave to file their response out of time,
which the Commission has granted.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, including the ALJ’s ID,
the petition for review and the
responses thereto, the Commission has
determined not to review the ID and
terminate the investigation with a
finding of no violation of section 337.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–.46 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–.46).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 3, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–10758 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121–0166]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Extension of a Currently
Approved Collection: Comments
Requested
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of information
collection under review: Extension of a
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
currently approved collection. Bureau
of Justice Assistance Application Form:
Public Safety Officers’ Disability
Benefits.
The Department of Justice, Office of
Justice Programs, will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
[Volume 75, Number 42, page 9928–
9929 on March 4, 2010], allowing for a
60-day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until June 7, 2010. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503. In
addition, comments may be submitted
to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395–5806.
Comments may also be submitted to M.
Berry by phone at 202–616–6500/1–
866–268–0079; by mail at Bureau of
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice,
810 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20531; via facsimile at 202–305–1367;
or by e-mail at M.A.Berry@ojp.usdoj.gov.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should do one or more of the
following:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Public Safety Officers’ Disability
Benefits.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: OJP FORM 3650/7 Public
Safety Officers’ Disability Benefits.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Dependents of public safety
officers who were killed or permanently
and totally disabled in the line of duty.
Abstract: The Public Safety Officers’
Benefits Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 3796,
authorizes the Public Safety Officers’
Benefits Office, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs,
U.S. Department of Justice to pay a
benefit to claimant public safety officers
found to have been permanently and
totally disabled as the direct result of a
catastrophic line-of-duty injury
sustained on or after November 29,
1990.
Others: None.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
needed for an average respondent to
respond is as follows: It is estimated that
no more than 100 respondents will
apply a year. Each application takes
approximately 120 minutes to complete.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: Total Annual Reporting
Burden: 100 × 120 minutes per
application = 12,000 minutes/60
minutes per hour = 200 hours.
If additional information is required,
please contact Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 4, 2010.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United
States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010–10863 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25293
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Rare Earth Industry and
Technology Association
Notice is hereby given that, on March
22, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Rare Earth
Technology Consortium (‘‘RETC’’) has
filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: Rare Earth Industry and
Tecimology Association, Greenwood
Village, CO; Global Tungsten & Powders
Corp., Towanda, PA; General Electric
Company, Niskayuna, NY; Arnold
Magnetic Technologies Corp.,
Rochester, NY; Electron Energy Corp.,
Landisville, PA; Colorado School of
Mines, Golden, CO; Worcester
Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA;
Iowa State University, Ames, IA;
University of Delaware, Newark, DE;
Rare Element Resources, Vancouver,
British Columbia, CANADA; and
Molycorp Minerals LLC, Greenwood
Village, CO. The general areas of RETC’s
planned activities are to (a) improve the
business conditions of entities engaged
in all points of the production chain for
rare earths magnets and other materials
and products beginning with extraction
of rare earths and ending with
marketing and sale of such materials
and products (‘‘Rare Earth Companies’’),
while providing guidance for such
companies to act as responsible
stewards of rare earth resources; (b)
promote the common business interests
of Rare Earth Companies by establishing
a consortium compromised of
commercial, charitable, academic and
state and local government
organizations that work together to
identify, develop, manage and
implement rare earth projects that
benefit for profit, nonprofit, government
and charitable entities, including,
without limitation, military and
commercial entities, and in doing so to
commercialize rare earth research,
technology and use for dual-purpose
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25292-25293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10863]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121-0166]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of a
Currently Approved Collection: Comments Requested
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of information collection under review: Extension
of a
[[Page 25293]]
currently approved collection. Bureau of Justice Assistance Application
Form: Public Safety Officers' Disability Benefits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, will be
submitting the following information collection request to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected
agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published
in the Federal Register [Volume 75, Number 42, page 9928-9929 on March
4, 2010], allowing for a 60-day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days
for public comment until June 7, 2010. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained
in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to OMB, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503. In addition, comments may be submitted to OMB via
facsimile to (202) 395-5806. Comments may also be submitted to M. Berry
by phone at 202-616-6500/1-866-268-0079; by mail at Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810
7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531; via facsimile at 202-305-1367;
or by e-mail at M.A.Berry@ojp.usdoj.gov.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should do one or more of the following:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Public Safety Officers'
Disability Benefits.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: OJP FORM 3650/7 Public
Safety Officers' Disability Benefits.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract:
Primary: Dependents of public safety officers who were killed or
permanently and totally disabled in the line of duty.
Abstract: The Public Safety Officers' Benefits Act of 1976, 42
U.S.C. 3796, authorizes the Public Safety Officers' Benefits Office,
Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S.
Department of Justice to pay a benefit to claimant public safety
officers found to have been permanently and totally disabled as the
direct result of a catastrophic line-of-duty injury sustained on or
after November 29, 1990.
Others: None.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time needed for an average respondent to respond is as follows: It
is estimated that no more than 100 respondents will apply a year. Each
application takes approximately 120 minutes to complete.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: Total Annual Reporting Burden: 100 x 120 minutes
per application = 12,000 minutes/60 minutes per hour = 200 hours.
If additional information is required, please contact Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 4, 2010.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010-10863 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P