High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Lifeline and Link-Up, 25156-25159 [2010-10853]
Download as PDF
25156
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Subpart B—Procedures Related to
NVOCC Negotiated Rate Arrangements
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 532.1
Purpose.
The purpose of this Part, pursuant to
the Commission’s statutory authority, is
to exempt licensed and bonded nonvessel-operating common carriers
(NVOCCs) from the tariff rate
publication and adherence requirements
of the Shipping Act of 1984, as
enumerated herein.
§ 532.4
§ 532.2
§ 532.5 Requirements for NVOCC
Negotiated Rate Arrangements
Scope and applicability.
This Part exempts NVOCCs duly
licensed pursuant to 46 CFR 515.3,
holding adequate proof of financial
responsibility pursuant to 46 CFR
515.21; and meeting the requirements of
46 CFR 532.4 through 532.7; from the
following requirements and prohibitions
of the Shipping Act and the
Commission’s regulations:
(a) The requirement in 46 U.S.C.
40501(a)–(c) that the NVOCC include its
rates in a tariff open to public
inspection in an automated tariff
system;
(b) 46 U.S.C. 40501(d);
(c) 46 U.S.C. 40501(e);
(d) 46 U.S.C. 40503;
(e) The prohibition in 46 U.S.C.
41104(2)(A); and
(f) The Commission’s corresponding
regulation at 46 CFR 520.3(a) that the
NVOCC include its rates in a tariff open
for public inspection in an automated
tariff system;
(g) The Commission’s corresponding
regulations at 46 CFR 520.4(a)(4),
520.4(f), 520.6(e), 520.7(c), (d), 520.8(a),
520.12, and 520.14. Any NVOCC failing
to maintain its bond or license as set
forth above, or who has had its tariff
suspended by the Commission, shall not
be eligible to invoke this exemption.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 532.3
Definitions.
When used in this part,
(a) ‘‘NVOCC Negotiated Rate
Arrangement’’ means a written and
binding arrangement between a shipper
and an eligible NVOCC to provide
specific transportation service for a
stated cargo quantity, from origin to
destination, on and after receipt of the
cargo by the carrier or its agent (or the
originating carrier in the case of through
transportation).
(b) ‘‘Rate’’ means a price stated for
providing a specified level of
transportation service for a stated cargo
quantity, from origin to destination, on
and after a stated date or within a
defined time frame.
(c) ‘‘Rules tariff’’ means the portion of
a tariff, as defined by 46 CFR 520.2,
containing the terms and conditions
governing the charges, classifications,
rules, regulations and practices of an
NVOCC, but does not include a rate.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Duties of the NVOCC.
Before entering into an NRA under
this Part, the NVOCC must:
(a) For each NRA, provide the
prospective shipper all the applicable
terms as set forth in its rules tariff; or
(b) Provide electronic access to its
rules tariffs to the public free of charge.
In order to qualify for the exemptions
to the general rate publication
requirement as set forth in section
532.2, an NRA must:
(a) Be in writing;
(b) Be agreed to by both shipper and
NVOCC prior to the date on which the
cargo is received by the common carrier
or its agent (including originating
carriers in the case of through
transportation);
(c) Clearly specify the rate and to
which shipment or shipments such rate
will apply; and
(d) may not be modified after the time
the shipment is received by the carrier
or its agent (including originating
carriers in the case of through
transportation).
§ 532.6
Notices.
(a) An NVOCC wishing to invoke an
exemption pursuant to this part must
indicate that intention to the
Commission and to the public by one or
more of the following:
(1) A prominent notice on its rules
tariff; or
(2) By so indicating on its Form FMC–
1 on file with the Commission.
(b) [Reserved]
Subpart C—Recordkeeping
Requirements
§ 532.7
Recordkeeping and audit.
(a) An NVOCC invoking an exemption
pursuant to this part must maintain
original NRAs and all associated records
including written communications for 5
years in a format easily produced to
Commission.
(b) NRAs and all associated records
and written communications are subject
to inspection and reproduction requests
under section 515.31(g) of this chapter.
An NVOCC shall produce the requested
NRAs and associated records, including
written communications, promptly in
response to a Commission request.
(c) Failure to keep or timely produce
original NRAs and associated records
and written communications will
disqualify an NVOCC from the
operation of the exemption provided
pursuant to this part, regardless of
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
whether it has been invoked by notice
as set forth above, and may result in a
Commission finding of a violation of 46
U.S.C. 41104(1), 41104(2)(A) or other
acts prohibited by the Shipping Act.
§ 532.91 OMB control number issued
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
The Commission has received OMB
approval for this collection of
information pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, as amended. In
accordance with that Act, agencies are
required to display a currently valid
control number. The valid control
number for this collection of
information is [3072–XXX].
By the Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–10476 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 05–337, CC Docket No. 96–
45, WC Docket No. 03–109; FCC 10–57]
High-Cost Universal Service Support,
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Lifeline and Link-Up
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission proposes targeted rule
changes to help eligible consumers in
Puerto Rico take better advantage of
existing universal service low-income
support programs. Specifically, the
Commission asks whether it should
provide additional Link-Up support to
help offset special construction charges
incurred by consumers when facilities
must be built to provide them with
access to voice telephone service. By
removing a remaining impediment to
affordable voice telephone service, the
Commission would hope to further
close the gap in telephone
subscribership between the
Commonwealth and non-insular areas.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rules
are due on or before June 7, 2010 and
reply comments are due on or before
June 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 05–337, CC
Docket No. 96–45, WC Docket No. 03–
109, by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202)
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted
Burmeister, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Telecommunications Access
Policy Division, (202) 418–7389 or TTY:
(202) 418–0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in WC Docket No.
05–337, CC Docket No. 96–45, WC
Docket No. 03–109, FCC 10–57, adopted
April 16, 2010, and released April 16,
2010. The complete text of this
document is available for inspection
and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The document may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800)
378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile
(202) 863–2898, or via the Internet at
https://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.fcc.gov.
Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998.
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Filers should follow the instructions
provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
Æ All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St., SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries
must be held together with rubber bands
or fasteners. Any envelopes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Æ Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
Æ U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be sent to each of the
following:
• The Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554; Web site: https://
www.bcpiweb.com; phone: 1–800–378–
3160; and
• Charles Tyler, Telecommunications
Access Policy Division, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room 5–A452, Washington, DC
20554; e-mail: Charles.Tyler@fcc.gov.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice) or
(202) 418–0432 (TTY). Contact the FCC
to request reasonable accommodations
for filing comments (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: fcc504@fcc.gov;
phone: (202) 418–0530 or (202) 418–
0432 (TTY).
Filings and comments are also
available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours
at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC,
20554. Copies may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25157
contractor, BCPI, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554.
Customers may contact BCPI through its
Web site: https://www.bcpiweb.com, by
e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by
telephone at (202) 488–5300 or (800)
378–3160 (voice), (202) 488–5562
(TTY), or by facsimile at (202) 488–
5563.
I. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
1. Although the Commission declines
to establish the universal service highcost support mechanism proposed by
Puerto Rico Telephone Company
(PRTC), the Commission acknowledges
that there may be a significant number
of low-income consumers in Puerto Rico
who remain unable to afford access to
voice telephone service. Telephone
subscribership in Puerto Rico has
increased dramatically since the
Commission released its notice of
proposed rulemaking in 2005. Despite
these gains, subscribership in Puerto
Rico remains materially lower than in
any other jurisdiction reported by the
Census Bureau. In addition, a
significantly higher percentage of Puerto
Rican families are below the poverty
threshold than the general U.S.
population, with approximately 41
percent of Puerto Rican families
reporting income below the poverty
threshold between 2006 and 2008, as
compared to approximately 10 percent
of total U.S. families reporting income
below the poverty threshold during the
same time period. The State with the
next highest percentage of families
reporting income below the poverty
threshold is Mississippi at 16.7 percent.
Not only does Puerto Rico have the
highest percentage of households with
incomes below the poverty level of any
jurisdiction reported by the Census
Bureau, but it has the lowest median
household income as well. Specifically,
the median household income in Puerto
Rico in 2007 was $17,741 compared
with a national median household
income of $50,740. The State with the
next lowest median household income
is West Virginia, with a median
household income of $37,060—over
twice the median household income in
Puerto Rico. Evidence in the record
suggests that infrastructure does not yet
reach some subscribers, so some people
may not be subscribing because they
cannot afford to pay the special
construction charges associated with
building facilities to reach them. The
confluence of these two factors—a
subscribership rate lower than any other
reported jurisdiction’s and an
exceptionally high rate of poverty—
causes us to believe that additional low-
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
25158
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
income support may be appropriate in
this jurisdiction. To address this
situation and to ensure that low-income
consumers in Puerto Rico can take
advantage of the assistance available to
them through the existing universal
service Lifeline and Link Up lowincome support programs, we propose
to amend our rules to allow eligible lowincome consumers in Puerto Rico
additional support through the Link Up
Program to offset special construction
charges incurred if additional facilities
are required to provide them with
access to voice telephone service.
2. The Commission in the Twelfth
Report and Order, 65 FR 47941, August
4, 2000, took measures to address
impediments to telephone
subscribership and infrastructure
investment on Tribal lands, including
the adoption of enhanced Link Up
support. The Commission identified a
number of factors that are primary
impediments to subscribership on
Tribal lands, including the cost of basic
voice service, the cost of intrastate toll
service, inadequate telecommunications
infrastructure and the cost of line
extensions, and the lack of competitive
service providers offering alternative
technologies. At that time, however, the
Commission chose not to extend the
actions taken in the Twelfth Report and
Order to all high-cost areas and all
insular areas, including Puerto Rico.
Although the record demonstrated that
subscribership levels were below the
national average in other low-income,
rural areas and in certain insular areas,
the Commission found that the factors
causing low subscribership on Tribal
lands were not the same factors causing
low subscribership in those other
jurisdictions. We recognize that is still
the case today: while Puerto Rico faces
a lower telephone subscriber rate and a
higher poverty rate than other
jurisdictions, the Commonwealth does
not appear to suffer from other
impediments to subscribership that
affect Tribal lands, notably higher cost
to provide voice telephone service and
a lack of competitive service providers
offering voice service via alternative
technologies. Moreover, Puerto Rico has
a much higher telephone subscribership
rate (approximately 92 percent in 2008)
than the subscribership rate we found
on reservations when we adopted the
Twelfth Report and Order
(approximately 47 percent).
3. Importantly, however, the
Commission’s decision in 2000 to limit
the measures adopted in the Twelfth
Report and Order to Tribal lands was
driven by its ‘‘concern[] that to devise a
remedy addressing all low
subscribership issues for all unserved or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
underserved populations
simultaneously might unnecessarily
delay action on behalf of those who are
least served, i.e., Tribal communities.’’
In other words, the Commission placed
higher priority on increasing telephone
subscribership on Tribal lands—it did
not determine that no further action was
needed to assist other unserved or
underserved populations. The
Commission has long attributed Puerto
Rico’s historically lagging telephone
subscribership penetration rate to low
per-capita income. Thus, to the extent
that parties have identified line
extension and construction costs as
obstacles to affordable telephone service
in Puerto Rico, extending the enhanced
Link Up support already available to
Tribal lands could likewise ‘‘increase
subscribership among qualifying lowincome individuals [in Puerto Rico] by
minimizing certain of these up-front
costs.’’ Indeed, by further reducing the
initial connection charges and line
extension charges for qualifying lowincome customers in Puerto Rico, as we
already have for consumers living on
Tribal lands, we would hope to remove
a remaining impediment to affordable
voice telephone service and, thus,
further close the gap in telephone
subscribership between the
Commonwealth and non-insular areas.
4. Specifically, for the benefit of
consumers in Puerto Rico meeting the
eligibility criteria for the Lifeline and
Link Up Programs, we propose to
amend our rules to increase the cap on
Link Up support to cover special
construction charges. The cap for these
charges would be increased from the
current $30 limit to $100. This
additional $70 in Link Up support
would cap Link Up discounts at the
same level as the enhanced Link Up
available to eligible residents of Tribal
lands. Link Up support would be
available to eligible low-income
consumers in Puerto Rico for up to 100
percent of the special construction
charges, subject to the $100 cap. Under
our rules, Link Up support would
continue to be available ‘‘for a single
telecommunications connection at a
consumer’s principal place of
residence.’’ To ensure reasonable use of
the support, this support would be
available only when a low-incomeeligible consumer in Puerto Rico has
requested service under the Lifeline or
Link Up Programs but such service
could not be provided absent
construction of additional facilities.
Consistent with our rules, all ETCs in
Puerto Rico would be required to offer
and make available this additional Link
Up support to eligible low-income
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumers. All ETCs in Puerto Rico also
would be required to advertise the
availability of this additional Link Up
support using media of general
distribution in Puerto Rico. In addition,
all ETCs receiving Link Up support in
Puerto Rico would be required to report
the number of consumers that request
such additional Link Up support, the
number of consumers that receive such
support, the reasons why any requesting
consumers did not qualify for or receive
such support, the cost of constructing
the additional facilities, and a
description of the additional facilities
constructed. This information would be
included in the annual report required
by section 54.209 of our rules. We seek
comment on these proposed revisions to
the low-income support rules for
eligible low-income consumers in
Puerto Rico.
II. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Paperwork Reduction Analysis
5. This notice of proposed rulemaking
contains proposed information
collections that would apply to fewer
than ten respondents and, as a result, is
not subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. In addition, it does not
contain any new, modified, or proposed
‘‘information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002.
B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
6. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), see 5 U.S.C. 603, requires that an
agency prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for notice-and-comment
rulemaking proceedings, unless the
agency certifies that ‘‘the rule will not,
if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.’’ The RFA
generally defines ‘‘small entity’’ as
having the same meaning as the terms
‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’
and ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’
In addition, the term ‘‘small business’’
has the same meaning as the term ‘‘small
business concern’’ under the Small
Business Act. A ‘‘small business
concern’’ is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
7. In this notice of proposed
rulemaking, we propose to revise the
Commission’s rules to permit eligible
telecommunications carriers serving
Puerto Rico to recover additional
universal service support under
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
specified circumstances. Currently,
there are 7 eligible telecommunications
carriers serving Puerto Rico, none of
which qualify as a small entity.
Accordingly, the proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
8. The Commission therefore certifies,
pursuant to the RFA, that the proposals
in this notice of proposed rulemaking, if
adopted, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. If commenters
believe that the proposals discussed in
the notice of proposed rulemaking
require additional RFA analysis, they
should include a discussion of these
issues in their comments and
additionally label them as RFA
comments. The Commission will send a
copy of the notice of proposed
rulemaking, including a copy of this
initial certification, to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA. In addition, a
copy of the notice of proposed
rulemaking and this initial certification
will be published in the Federal
Register.
C. Ex Parte Presentations
9. This proceeding shall be treated as
a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making oral ex
parte presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must contain summaries
of the substance of the presentations
and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two
sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required. Other requirements pertaining
to oral and written presentations are set
forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s
rules.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 54
Communications Common Carriers,
Low income, Puerto Rico, Reporting and
record keeping requirements, Schools,
Telecommunications, Telephone.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
2. Section 54.411 is amended by
revising the first sentence of paragraphs
(a)(3), the second sentence of paragraph
(b), and by adding paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
§ 54.411
RIN 0750–AG45
Link Up program defined.
(a) * * *
(3) For an eligible resident of Tribal
lands or Puerto Rico, a reduction of up
to $70, in addition to the reduction in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, to cover
100 percent of the charges between $60
and $130 assessed for commencing
telecommunications service at the
principal place of residence of the
eligible resident of Tribal lands or
Puerto Rico. * * *
(b) * * * An eligible resident of
Tribal lands or Puerto Rico may
participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2),
and (a)(3) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) In order to receive enhanced Link
Up support for discounted connection
charges provided to eligible residents of
Puerto Rico pursuant to paragraph (a)(3)
of this section, an eligible
telecommunication carrier must comply
with the following requirements:
(1) An eligible low-income consumer
in Puerto Rico has requested service
under the Lifeline or Link Up Programs
but such service could not be provided
absent construction of additional
facilities.
(2) The eligible telecommunications
carrier must report the number of
consumers that request such additional
Link Up support, the number of
consumers that receive such support,
the reasons why any requesting
consumers did not qualify for or receive
such support, the cost of constructing
the additional facilities, and a
description of the additional facilities
constructed. This information must be
included in the annual report required
by section 54.209 of our rules.
[FR Doc. 2010–10853 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
25159
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 54 as follows:
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 207
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Preservation
of Tooling for Major Defense
Acquisition Programs (DFARS Case
2008–D042)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement section 815 of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2009. Section 815
requires acquisition plans for major
weapons systems to include a plan for
the preservation and storage of special
tooling associated with the production
of hardware for major defense
acquisition programs through the end of
the service life of the related weapons
system.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before July
6, 2010, to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2008–D042,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2008–D042 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: 703–602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Mary
Overstreet, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS),
3060 Defense Pentagon, Room 3B855,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Mary Overstreet, 703–602–0311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PART 54—UNIVERSAL SERVICE
A. Background
1. The authority citation continues to
read as follows:
This proposed rule affects all
contracts for major weapons that will
require special tooling associated with
the production of hardware for major
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 201, 205,
214, and 254 unless otherwise noted.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25156-25159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10853]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109; FCC
10-57]
High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service, Lifeline and Link-Up
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission proposes targeted rule
changes to help eligible consumers in Puerto Rico take better advantage
of existing universal service low-income support programs.
Specifically, the Commission asks whether it should provide additional
Link-Up support to help offset special construction charges incurred by
consumers when facilities must be built to provide them with access to
voice telephone service. By removing a remaining impediment to
affordable voice telephone service, the Commission would hope to
further close the gap in telephone subscribership between the
Commonwealth and non-insular areas.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rules are due on or before June 7, 2010
and reply comments are due on or before June 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 05-337,
CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 25157]]
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: (202)
418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Burmeister, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, (202) 418-7389 or
TTY: (202) 418-0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No.
96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109, FCC 10-57, adopted April 16, 2010, and
released April 16, 2010. The complete text of this document is
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in
the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be purchased
from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing,
Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone (800) 378-3160 or (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898,
or via the Internet at https://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also available on
the Commission's Web site at https://www.fcc.gov.
Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,
47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998.
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/
or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers
should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S.
Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
[cir] All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are
8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber
bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering
the building.
[cir] Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
[cir] U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail
should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the
following:
The Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC
20554; Web site: https://www.bcpiweb.com; phone: 1-800-378-3160; and
Charles Tyler, Telecommunications Access Policy Division,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 5-A452,
Washington, DC 20554; e-mail: Charles.Tyler@fcc.gov.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or
(202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contact the FCC to request reasonable
accommodations for filing comments (accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: fcc504@fcc.gov; phone:
(202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
20554. Copies may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating
contractor, BCPI, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC
20554. Customers may contact BCPI through its Web site: https://www.bcpiweb.com, by e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by telephone at (202)
488-5300 or (800) 378-3160 (voice), (202) 488-5562 (TTY), or by
facsimile at (202) 488-5563.
I. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
1. Although the Commission declines to establish the universal
service high-cost support mechanism proposed by Puerto Rico Telephone
Company (PRTC), the Commission acknowledges that there may be a
significant number of low-income consumers in Puerto Rico who remain
unable to afford access to voice telephone service. Telephone
subscribership in Puerto Rico has increased dramatically since the
Commission released its notice of proposed rulemaking in 2005. Despite
these gains, subscribership in Puerto Rico remains materially lower
than in any other jurisdiction reported by the Census Bureau. In
addition, a significantly higher percentage of Puerto Rican families
are below the poverty threshold than the general U.S. population, with
approximately 41 percent of Puerto Rican families reporting income
below the poverty threshold between 2006 and 2008, as compared to
approximately 10 percent of total U.S. families reporting income below
the poverty threshold during the same time period. The State with the
next highest percentage of families reporting income below the poverty
threshold is Mississippi at 16.7 percent. Not only does Puerto Rico
have the highest percentage of households with incomes below the
poverty level of any jurisdiction reported by the Census Bureau, but it
has the lowest median household income as well. Specifically, the
median household income in Puerto Rico in 2007 was $17,741 compared
with a national median household income of $50,740. The State with the
next lowest median household income is West Virginia, with a median
household income of $37,060--over twice the median household income in
Puerto Rico. Evidence in the record suggests that infrastructure does
not yet reach some subscribers, so some people may not be subscribing
because they cannot afford to pay the special construction charges
associated with building facilities to reach them. The confluence of
these two factors--a subscribership rate lower than any other reported
jurisdiction's and an exceptionally high rate of poverty--causes us to
believe that additional low-
[[Page 25158]]
income support may be appropriate in this jurisdiction. To address this
situation and to ensure that low-income consumers in Puerto Rico can
take advantage of the assistance available to them through the existing
universal service Lifeline and Link Up low-income support programs, we
propose to amend our rules to allow eligible low-income consumers in
Puerto Rico additional support through the Link Up Program to offset
special construction charges incurred if additional facilities are
required to provide them with access to voice telephone service.
2. The Commission in the Twelfth Report and Order, 65 FR 47941,
August 4, 2000, took measures to address impediments to telephone
subscribership and infrastructure investment on Tribal lands, including
the adoption of enhanced Link Up support. The Commission identified a
number of factors that are primary impediments to subscribership on
Tribal lands, including the cost of basic voice service, the cost of
intrastate toll service, inadequate telecommunications infrastructure
and the cost of line extensions, and the lack of competitive service
providers offering alternative technologies. At that time, however, the
Commission chose not to extend the actions taken in the Twelfth Report
and Order to all high-cost areas and all insular areas, including
Puerto Rico. Although the record demonstrated that subscribership
levels were below the national average in other low-income, rural areas
and in certain insular areas, the Commission found that the factors
causing low subscribership on Tribal lands were not the same factors
causing low subscribership in those other jurisdictions. We recognize
that is still the case today: while Puerto Rico faces a lower telephone
subscriber rate and a higher poverty rate than other jurisdictions, the
Commonwealth does not appear to suffer from other impediments to
subscribership that affect Tribal lands, notably higher cost to provide
voice telephone service and a lack of competitive service providers
offering voice service via alternative technologies. Moreover, Puerto
Rico has a much higher telephone subscribership rate (approximately 92
percent in 2008) than the subscribership rate we found on reservations
when we adopted the Twelfth Report and Order (approximately 47
percent).
3. Importantly, however, the Commission's decision in 2000 to limit
the measures adopted in the Twelfth Report and Order to Tribal lands
was driven by its ``concern[] that to devise a remedy addressing all
low subscribership issues for all unserved or underserved populations
simultaneously might unnecessarily delay action on behalf of those who
are least served, i.e., Tribal communities.'' In other words, the
Commission placed higher priority on increasing telephone
subscribership on Tribal lands--it did not determine that no further
action was needed to assist other unserved or underserved populations.
The Commission has long attributed Puerto Rico's historically lagging
telephone subscribership penetration rate to low per-capita income.
Thus, to the extent that parties have identified line extension and
construction costs as obstacles to affordable telephone service in
Puerto Rico, extending the enhanced Link Up support already available
to Tribal lands could likewise ``increase subscribership among
qualifying low-income individuals [in Puerto Rico] by minimizing
certain of these up-front costs.'' Indeed, by further reducing the
initial connection charges and line extension charges for qualifying
low-income customers in Puerto Rico, as we already have for consumers
living on Tribal lands, we would hope to remove a remaining impediment
to affordable voice telephone service and, thus, further close the gap
in telephone subscribership between the Commonwealth and non-insular
areas.
4. Specifically, for the benefit of consumers in Puerto Rico
meeting the eligibility criteria for the Lifeline and Link Up Programs,
we propose to amend our rules to increase the cap on Link Up support to
cover special construction charges. The cap for these charges would be
increased from the current $30 limit to $100. This additional $70 in
Link Up support would cap Link Up discounts at the same level as the
enhanced Link Up available to eligible residents of Tribal lands. Link
Up support would be available to eligible low-income consumers in
Puerto Rico for up to 100 percent of the special construction charges,
subject to the $100 cap. Under our rules, Link Up support would
continue to be available ``for a single telecommunications connection
at a consumer's principal place of residence.'' To ensure reasonable
use of the support, this support would be available only when a low-
income-eligible consumer in Puerto Rico has requested service under the
Lifeline or Link Up Programs but such service could not be provided
absent construction of additional facilities. Consistent with our
rules, all ETCs in Puerto Rico would be required to offer and make
available this additional Link Up support to eligible low-income
consumers. All ETCs in Puerto Rico also would be required to advertise
the availability of this additional Link Up support using media of
general distribution in Puerto Rico. In addition, all ETCs receiving
Link Up support in Puerto Rico would be required to report the number
of consumers that request such additional Link Up support, the number
of consumers that receive such support, the reasons why any requesting
consumers did not qualify for or receive such support, the cost of
constructing the additional facilities, and a description of the
additional facilities constructed. This information would be included
in the annual report required by section 54.209 of our rules. We seek
comment on these proposed revisions to the low-income support rules for
eligible low-income consumers in Puerto Rico.
II. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Paperwork Reduction Analysis
5. This notice of proposed rulemaking contains proposed information
collections that would apply to fewer than ten respondents and, as a
result, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In
addition, it does not contain any new, modified, or proposed
``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act
of 2002.
B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
6. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), see 5 U.S.C. 603, requires
that an agency prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for notice-
and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that
``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines
``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
7. In this notice of proposed rulemaking, we propose to revise the
Commission's rules to permit eligible telecommunications carriers
serving Puerto Rico to recover additional universal service support
under
[[Page 25159]]
specified circumstances. Currently, there are 7 eligible
telecommunications carriers serving Puerto Rico, none of which qualify
as a small entity. Accordingly, the proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
8. The Commission therefore certifies, pursuant to the RFA, that
the proposals in this notice of proposed rulemaking, if adopted, will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in the
notice of proposed rulemaking require additional RFA analysis, they
should include a discussion of these issues in their comments and
additionally label them as RFA comments. The Commission will send a
copy of the notice of proposed rulemaking, including a copy of this
initial certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. In
addition, a copy of the notice of proposed rulemaking and this initial
certification will be published in the Federal Register.
C. Ex Parte Presentations
9. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance
of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements
pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Sec.
1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 54
Communications Common Carriers, Low income, Puerto Rico, Reporting
and record keeping requirements, Schools, Telecommunications,
Telephone.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 54 as follows:
PART 54--UNIVERSAL SERVICE
1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 201, 205, 214, and 254 unless
otherwise noted.
2. Section 54.411 is amended by revising the first sentence of
paragraphs (a)(3), the second sentence of paragraph (b), and by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 54.411 Link Up program defined.
(a) * * *
(3) For an eligible resident of Tribal lands or Puerto Rico, a
reduction of up to $70, in addition to the reduction in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, to cover 100 percent of the charges between $60
and $130 assessed for commencing telecommunications service at the
principal place of residence of the eligible resident of Tribal lands
or Puerto Rico. * * *
(b) * * * An eligible resident of Tribal lands or Puerto Rico may
participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
(e) In order to receive enhanced Link Up support for discounted
connection charges provided to eligible residents of Puerto Rico
pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, an eligible
telecommunication carrier must comply with the following requirements:
(1) An eligible low-income consumer in Puerto Rico has requested
service under the Lifeline or Link Up Programs but such service could
not be provided absent construction of additional facilities.
(2) The eligible telecommunications carrier must report the number
of consumers that request such additional Link Up support, the number
of consumers that receive such support, the reasons why any requesting
consumers did not qualify for or receive such support, the cost of
constructing the additional facilities, and a description of the
additional facilities constructed. This information must be included in
the annual report required by section 54.209 of our rules.
[FR Doc. 2010-10853 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P