Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Proposed Extension of Deadline for Inventory of Special Nuclear Material, 25301-25302 [2010-10828]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
recombinant DNA is introduced into E.
coli which can be cultured to produce
large quantities of the recombinant DNA
for analysis and sequencing. E. coli
engineered for routine cloning purposes
belongs to the K–12 strain, which
generally cannot survive outside the
Lab. All cells will be autoclaved within
the Lab to destroy all active cells.
Location: Palmer and McMurdo
Station laboratories.
Dates: August 13, 2010 to March 1,
2011.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–10756 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[DOCKET NO. 70–143; NRC–2010–0175]
Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Proposed Extension of Deadline for
Inventory of Special Nuclear Material
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin M. Ramsey, Project Manager, Fuel
Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel
Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Mail Stop EBB–2C40M, Rockville, MD
20555–0001, Telephone (301) 492–3123;
Fax (301) 492–3359; e-mail
kevin.ramsey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) staff is considering
the issuance of a license amendment to
Materials License SNM–124 to Nuclear
Fuel Services, Inc. (NFS) (the licensee)
to grant a one-time exemption from an
inventory requirement for strategic
special nuclear material. NRC
regulations at Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 74.59(f)(1)
state that a physical inventory of
strategic special nuclear material must
occur every six months. By letter dated
March 10, 2010, NFS requested a
temporary exemption from this
requirement.
The NRC has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in
support of this amendment and
exemption request in accordance with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51.
Based on the EA, the NRC has
concluded that a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) is
appropriate; therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will not be prepared.
II. Environmental Assessment
Background
The NFS facility in Erwin, Tennessee
is authorized, under License SNM–124
to manufacture high-enriched nuclear
reactor fuel. In addition, NFS is
authorized to blend highly enriched
uranium with natural uranium and
manufacture low-enriched nuclear
reactor fuel. Currently, several
processing lines are in a safe-shutdown
mode, in accordance with Confirmatory
Action Letter No. 02–2010–001 dated
January 7, 2010. Operations were shut
down without the usual material
processing/clean-out that is required to
be undertaken as part of a measured
physical inventory. NFS is currently in
the process of implementing program
improvements and conducting
operational readiness reviews which
must be reviewed and approved by NRC
before each process line is restarted.
After operations are authorized, each
process line must be operated to process
the material to a suitable form that will
enable a measurable physical inventory
to occur. NFS requests that the
inventory reporting date be extended
until 90 days after all processing lines
are authorized to restart operations, a
date which is currently unknown.
Review Scope
The purpose of this EA is to assess the
environmental impacts of the requested
license amendment and exemption. It
does not approve the request. This EA
is limited to the proposed exemption
and any cumulative impacts on existing
plant operations. The existing
conditions and operations for the Erwin
facility were evaluated by NRC for
environmental impacts in a 1999 EA
related to the renewal of the NFS license
(Ref. 1) and a 2002 EA related to the first
amendment for the Blended LowEnriched Uranium (BLEU) Project (Ref.
2). The 2002 EA assessed the impact of
the entire BLEU Project using
information available at that time. A
2003 EA (Ref. 3) and a 2004 EA (Ref. 4),
related to additional BLEU Project
amendments, confirmed the FONSI
issued in 2002.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to amend NRC
Materials License SNM–124 to grant a
one-time exemption from the
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25301
requirement to take a physical inventory
of strategic special nuclear material
every six months. The exemption would
authorize NFS to submit the physical
inventory results after NRC has
authorized the restart of all operations
currently shutdown, and after NFS has
had an opportunity to then process the
material and complete the inventory.
The proposed action is limited to the
reporting deadline only. No change to
processing, packaging, or storage
operations is requested, and no
construction of new facilities is
requested.
Need for Proposed Action
The proposed action is being
requested because NFS had to secure
operations in several processing lines to
implement program improvements. NFS
has committed to maintain the
processing lines in a safe-shutdown
mode until NRC authorizes restart of
operations. Regulations in 10 CFR
74.59(f)(1) require a physical inventory
of strategic special nuclear material
every six months. To comply with this
regulation, the material must be
processed into a form that can be
inventoried. Material in the processing
lines is not in a form that can be
inventoried, and it cannot be processed
into the proper form until the restart of
operations is authorized.
Alternatives
The alternatives available to NRC are:
1. Approve the requested action as
described, or
2. No action (i.e., deny the request).
Affected Environment
The affected environment for the
proposed action and the no action
alternative is the NFS site. The NFS
facility is located in Unicoi County,
Tennessee, about 32 km (20 mi)
southwest of Johnson City, Tennessee.
The facility is within the Erwin city
limits. The affected environment is
identical to the affected environment
assessed in the 2002 EA related to the
first amendment for the BLEU Project
(Ref. 2). A full description of the site
and its characteristics are given in the
2002 EA. Additional information can be
found in the 1999 EA related to the
renewal of the NFS license (Ref. 1). The
site occupies about 28 hectares (70
acres). The site is bounded to the
northwest by the CSX Corporation
(CSX) railroad property and the
Nolichucky River; and by Martin Creek
to the northeast. The plant elevation is
about 9 m (30 ft) above the nearest point
on the Nolichucky River.
The area adjacent to the site consists
primarily of residential, industrial, and
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
25302
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
commercial areas, with a limited
amount of farming to the northwest.
Privately owned residences are located
to the east and south of the facility.
Tract size is relatively large, leading to
a low housing density in the areas
adjacent to the facility. The CSX
railroad right-of-way is parallel to the
western boundary of the site. Industrial
development is located adjacent to the
railroad on the opposite side of the
right-of-way. The site is bounded by
Martin Creek to the north with privately
owned, vacant property and low-density
residences.
Environmental Impacts of Proposed
Action and Alternatives
1. Occupational and Public Health
Proposed Action
The occupational and public health
impacts from the proposed action are
essentially the same as those considered
in the previous environmental
assessments. If the exemption is
granted, inactive processing lines will
remain in a safe-shutdown mode, which
will reduce the emissions from normal
operations and reduce the risk of
accidents. However, the reductions
would be so small that the differences
would be negligible.
No Action
Denying this amendment request
would not result in any significant
difference in the occupational and
public health impacts when compared
to the proposed action. If this
amendment and exemption request is
denied, the licensee may be cited for
failing to submit a required report.
However, the material cannot be
inventoried until it is processed into an
appropriate form. The facility will
continue to implement NRC-approved
radiation safety procedures for storing
and handling radioactive materials.
Thus, the impacts under the ‘‘no action’’
alternative will remain within
acceptable regulatory limits.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2. Effluent Releases, Environmental
Monitoring, Water Resources, Geology,
Soils, Air Quality, Demography, Biota,
Cultural and Historic Resources
Proposed Action
The NRC staff has determined that the
approval of the proposed action will not
impact effluent releases, environmental
monitoring, water resources, geology,
soils, air quality, demography, biota, or
cultural or historic resources at or near
the NFS site.
No Action
The NRC staff has determined that
denial of the proposed action will not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
impact effluent releases, environmental
monitoring, water resources, geology,
soils, air quality, demography, biota, or
cultural or historic resources at or near
the NFS site.
Conclusion
Based on its review, the NRC has
concluded that the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action are not significant and, therefore,
do not warrant the preparation of an
EIS. The NRC has determined that the
proposed action, approval of the license
amendment and exemption as
described, is the appropriate alternative
for selection. Based on an evaluation of
the environmental impacts of the
proposed action, the NRC has
determined that the proper action is to
issue a FONSI.
Agencies and Persons Contacted
Time Exemption,’’ March 10, 2010,
ADAMS Accession No. ML100760326.
6. R. Crosslin, Tennessee Division of
Radiological Health, e-mail to K.
Ramsey, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, ‘‘EA for NFS Exemption,’’
April 30, 2010, ADAMS Accession No.
ML101200082.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Pursuant to 10 CFR part 51, the NRC
staff has considered the environmental
consequences of amending NRC
Materials License SNM–124 to grant a
one-time exemption from the physical
inventory deadline for strategic special
nuclear material. On the basis of this
EA, the NRC has concluded that there
are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
amendment and has determined not to
prepare an EIS for the proposed
amendment.
On April 26, 2010, the NRC staff
contacted the Division of Radiological
Health in the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC)
concerning this EA. On April 30, 2010,
TDEC responded that it had reviewed
the draft EA and had no comments (Ref.
6).
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action will not affect listed
species or critical habitat. Therefore, no
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act.
Likewise, the NRC staff has determined
that the proposed action is not the type
of activity that has the potential to cause
effects on historic properties. Therefore,
no consultation is required under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
IV. Further Information
The documents referenced in this
Notice may be made available to
interested parties pursuant to a
protective order and subject to
applicable security requirements upon a
showing that the party has an interest
that may be affected by the proposed
action.
References
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment for Renewal
of Special Nuclear Material License No.
SNM–124,’’ January 1999, ADAMS
Accession No. ML050600258.
2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment for
Proposed License Amendments to
Special Nuclear Material License No.
SNM–124 Regarding Downblending and
Oxide Conversion of Surplus HighEnriched Uranium,’’ June 2002, ADAMS
Accession No. ML050540096.
3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact for the BLEU
Preparation Facility,’’ September 2003,
ADAMS Accession No. ML032390428.
4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact for the Oxide
Conversion Building and the Effluent
Processing Building at the BLEU
Complex,’’ June 2004, ADAMS Accession
No. ML041470176.
5. Nuclear Fuel Services, ‘‘Request for One-
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of April 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter J. Habighorst,
Chief, Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division
of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–10828 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR
The ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR
will hold a meeting on May 18–19,
2010, Room T–2B1, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
a portion that may be closed to protect
information that is proprietary to
General Electric-Hitachi Nuclear
Americas, LLC (GEH) and its contractors
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Tuesday, May 18, 2010—8:30 a.m.
until 5 p.m.; Wednesday, May 19,
2010—8:30 a.m.–12 p.m.
The Subcommittee will discuss
Chapters 4, 8, 6, and 9 of the Safety
Evaluation Report associated with the
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25301-25302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10828]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[DOCKET NO. 70-143; NRC-2010-0175]
Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.; Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact for Proposed Extension of Deadline for
Inventory of Special Nuclear Material
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin M. Ramsey, Project Manager, Fuel
Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop EBB-2C40M, Rockville, MD 20555-0001,
Telephone (301) 492-3123; Fax (301) 492-3359; e-mail
kevin.ramsey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is considering
the issuance of a license amendment to Materials License SNM-124 to
Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. (NFS) (the licensee) to grant a one-time
exemption from an inventory requirement for strategic special nuclear
material. NRC regulations at Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) 74.59(f)(1) state that a physical inventory of
strategic special nuclear material must occur every six months. By
letter dated March 10, 2010, NFS requested a temporary exemption from
this requirement.
The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of
this amendment and exemption request in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded
that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate;
therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be
prepared.
II. Environmental Assessment
Background
The NFS facility in Erwin, Tennessee is authorized, under License
SNM-124 to manufacture high-enriched nuclear reactor fuel. In addition,
NFS is authorized to blend highly enriched uranium with natural uranium
and manufacture low-enriched nuclear reactor fuel. Currently, several
processing lines are in a safe-shutdown mode, in accordance with
Confirmatory Action Letter No. 02-2010-001 dated January 7, 2010.
Operations were shut down without the usual material processing/clean-
out that is required to be undertaken as part of a measured physical
inventory. NFS is currently in the process of implementing program
improvements and conducting operational readiness reviews which must be
reviewed and approved by NRC before each process line is restarted.
After operations are authorized, each process line must be operated to
process the material to a suitable form that will enable a measurable
physical inventory to occur. NFS requests that the inventory reporting
date be extended until 90 days after all processing lines are
authorized to restart operations, a date which is currently unknown.
Review Scope
The purpose of this EA is to assess the environmental impacts of
the requested license amendment and exemption. It does not approve the
request. This EA is limited to the proposed exemption and any
cumulative impacts on existing plant operations. The existing
conditions and operations for the Erwin facility were evaluated by NRC
for environmental impacts in a 1999 EA related to the renewal of the
NFS license (Ref. 1) and a 2002 EA related to the first amendment for
the Blended Low-Enriched Uranium (BLEU) Project (Ref. 2). The 2002 EA
assessed the impact of the entire BLEU Project using information
available at that time. A 2003 EA (Ref. 3) and a 2004 EA (Ref. 4),
related to additional BLEU Project amendments, confirmed the FONSI
issued in 2002.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to amend NRC Materials License SNM-124 to
grant a one-time exemption from the requirement to take a physical
inventory of strategic special nuclear material every six months. The
exemption would authorize NFS to submit the physical inventory results
after NRC has authorized the restart of all operations currently
shutdown, and after NFS has had an opportunity to then process the
material and complete the inventory. The proposed action is limited to
the reporting deadline only. No change to processing, packaging, or
storage operations is requested, and no construction of new facilities
is requested.
Need for Proposed Action
The proposed action is being requested because NFS had to secure
operations in several processing lines to implement program
improvements. NFS has committed to maintain the processing lines in a
safe-shutdown mode until NRC authorizes restart of operations.
Regulations in 10 CFR 74.59(f)(1) require a physical inventory of
strategic special nuclear material every six months. To comply with
this regulation, the material must be processed into a form that can be
inventoried. Material in the processing lines is not in a form that can
be inventoried, and it cannot be processed into the proper form until
the restart of operations is authorized.
Alternatives
The alternatives available to NRC are:
1. Approve the requested action as described, or
2. No action (i.e., deny the request).
Affected Environment
The affected environment for the proposed action and the no action
alternative is the NFS site. The NFS facility is located in Unicoi
County, Tennessee, about 32 km (20 mi) southwest of Johnson City,
Tennessee. The facility is within the Erwin city limits. The affected
environment is identical to the affected environment assessed in the
2002 EA related to the first amendment for the BLEU Project (Ref. 2). A
full description of the site and its characteristics are given in the
2002 EA. Additional information can be found in the 1999 EA related to
the renewal of the NFS license (Ref. 1). The site occupies about 28
hectares (70 acres). The site is bounded to the northwest by the CSX
Corporation (CSX) railroad property and the Nolichucky River; and by
Martin Creek to the northeast. The plant elevation is about 9 m (30 ft)
above the nearest point on the Nolichucky River.
The area adjacent to the site consists primarily of residential,
industrial, and
[[Page 25302]]
commercial areas, with a limited amount of farming to the northwest.
Privately owned residences are located to the east and south of the
facility. Tract size is relatively large, leading to a low housing
density in the areas adjacent to the facility. The CSX railroad right-
of-way is parallel to the western boundary of the site. Industrial
development is located adjacent to the railroad on the opposite side of
the right-of-way. The site is bounded by Martin Creek to the north with
privately owned, vacant property and low-density residences.
Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action and Alternatives
1. Occupational and Public Health
Proposed Action
The occupational and public health impacts from the proposed action
are essentially the same as those considered in the previous
environmental assessments. If the exemption is granted, inactive
processing lines will remain in a safe-shutdown mode, which will reduce
the emissions from normal operations and reduce the risk of accidents.
However, the reductions would be so small that the differences would be
negligible.
No Action
Denying this amendment request would not result in any significant
difference in the occupational and public health impacts when compared
to the proposed action. If this amendment and exemption request is
denied, the licensee may be cited for failing to submit a required
report. However, the material cannot be inventoried until it is
processed into an appropriate form. The facility will continue to
implement NRC-approved radiation safety procedures for storing and
handling radioactive materials. Thus, the impacts under the ``no
action'' alternative will remain within acceptable regulatory limits.
2. Effluent Releases, Environmental Monitoring, Water Resources,
Geology, Soils, Air Quality, Demography, Biota, Cultural and Historic
Resources
Proposed Action
The NRC staff has determined that the approval of the proposed
action will not impact effluent releases, environmental monitoring,
water resources, geology, soils, air quality, demography, biota, or
cultural or historic resources at or near the NFS site.
No Action
The NRC staff has determined that denial of the proposed action
will not impact effluent releases, environmental monitoring, water
resources, geology, soils, air quality, demography, biota, or cultural
or historic resources at or near the NFS site.
Conclusion
Based on its review, the NRC has concluded that the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed action are not significant and,
therefore, do not warrant the preparation of an EIS. The NRC has
determined that the proposed action, approval of the license amendment
and exemption as described, is the appropriate alternative for
selection. Based on an evaluation of the environmental impacts of the
proposed action, the NRC has determined that the proper action is to
issue a FONSI.
Agencies and Persons Contacted
On April 26, 2010, the NRC staff contacted the Division of
Radiological Health in the Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation (TDEC) concerning this EA. On April 30, 2010, TDEC
responded that it had reviewed the draft EA and had no comments (Ref.
6).
The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not
affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, no consultation
is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise,
the NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is not the type
of activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic
properties. Therefore, no consultation is required under Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act.
References
1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Assessment
for Renewal of Special Nuclear Material License No. SNM-124,''
January 1999, ADAMS Accession No. ML050600258.
2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Assessment
for Proposed License Amendments to Special Nuclear Material License
No. SNM-124 Regarding Downblending and Oxide Conversion of Surplus
High-Enriched Uranium,'' June 2002, ADAMS Accession No. ML050540096.
3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Assessment
and Finding of No Significant Impact for the BLEU Preparation
Facility,'' September 2003, ADAMS Accession No. ML032390428.
4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Assessment
and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Oxide Conversion
Building and the Effluent Processing Building at the BLEU Complex,''
June 2004, ADAMS Accession No. ML041470176.
5. Nuclear Fuel Services, ``Request for One-Time Exemption,'' March
10, 2010, ADAMS Accession No. ML100760326.
6. R. Crosslin, Tennessee Division of Radiological Health, e-mail to
K. Ramsey, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``EA for NFS
Exemption,'' April 30, 2010, ADAMS Accession No. ML101200082.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Pursuant to 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has considered the
environmental consequences of amending NRC Materials License SNM-124 to
grant a one-time exemption from the physical inventory deadline for
strategic special nuclear material. On the basis of this EA, the NRC
has concluded that there are no significant environmental impacts
associated with the proposed amendment and has determined not to
prepare an EIS for the proposed amendment.
IV. Further Information
The documents referenced in this Notice may be made available to
interested parties pursuant to a protective order and subject to
applicable security requirements upon a showing that the party has an
interest that may be affected by the proposed action.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter J. Habighorst,
Chief, Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and
Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010-10828 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P