Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR, 25302-25303 [2010-10817]
Download as PDF
25302
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
commercial areas, with a limited
amount of farming to the northwest.
Privately owned residences are located
to the east and south of the facility.
Tract size is relatively large, leading to
a low housing density in the areas
adjacent to the facility. The CSX
railroad right-of-way is parallel to the
western boundary of the site. Industrial
development is located adjacent to the
railroad on the opposite side of the
right-of-way. The site is bounded by
Martin Creek to the north with privately
owned, vacant property and low-density
residences.
Environmental Impacts of Proposed
Action and Alternatives
1. Occupational and Public Health
Proposed Action
The occupational and public health
impacts from the proposed action are
essentially the same as those considered
in the previous environmental
assessments. If the exemption is
granted, inactive processing lines will
remain in a safe-shutdown mode, which
will reduce the emissions from normal
operations and reduce the risk of
accidents. However, the reductions
would be so small that the differences
would be negligible.
No Action
Denying this amendment request
would not result in any significant
difference in the occupational and
public health impacts when compared
to the proposed action. If this
amendment and exemption request is
denied, the licensee may be cited for
failing to submit a required report.
However, the material cannot be
inventoried until it is processed into an
appropriate form. The facility will
continue to implement NRC-approved
radiation safety procedures for storing
and handling radioactive materials.
Thus, the impacts under the ‘‘no action’’
alternative will remain within
acceptable regulatory limits.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2. Effluent Releases, Environmental
Monitoring, Water Resources, Geology,
Soils, Air Quality, Demography, Biota,
Cultural and Historic Resources
Proposed Action
The NRC staff has determined that the
approval of the proposed action will not
impact effluent releases, environmental
monitoring, water resources, geology,
soils, air quality, demography, biota, or
cultural or historic resources at or near
the NFS site.
No Action
The NRC staff has determined that
denial of the proposed action will not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
impact effluent releases, environmental
monitoring, water resources, geology,
soils, air quality, demography, biota, or
cultural or historic resources at or near
the NFS site.
Conclusion
Based on its review, the NRC has
concluded that the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action are not significant and, therefore,
do not warrant the preparation of an
EIS. The NRC has determined that the
proposed action, approval of the license
amendment and exemption as
described, is the appropriate alternative
for selection. Based on an evaluation of
the environmental impacts of the
proposed action, the NRC has
determined that the proper action is to
issue a FONSI.
Agencies and Persons Contacted
Time Exemption,’’ March 10, 2010,
ADAMS Accession No. ML100760326.
6. R. Crosslin, Tennessee Division of
Radiological Health, e-mail to K.
Ramsey, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, ‘‘EA for NFS Exemption,’’
April 30, 2010, ADAMS Accession No.
ML101200082.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Pursuant to 10 CFR part 51, the NRC
staff has considered the environmental
consequences of amending NRC
Materials License SNM–124 to grant a
one-time exemption from the physical
inventory deadline for strategic special
nuclear material. On the basis of this
EA, the NRC has concluded that there
are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
amendment and has determined not to
prepare an EIS for the proposed
amendment.
On April 26, 2010, the NRC staff
contacted the Division of Radiological
Health in the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC)
concerning this EA. On April 30, 2010,
TDEC responded that it had reviewed
the draft EA and had no comments (Ref.
6).
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action will not affect listed
species or critical habitat. Therefore, no
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act.
Likewise, the NRC staff has determined
that the proposed action is not the type
of activity that has the potential to cause
effects on historic properties. Therefore,
no consultation is required under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
IV. Further Information
The documents referenced in this
Notice may be made available to
interested parties pursuant to a
protective order and subject to
applicable security requirements upon a
showing that the party has an interest
that may be affected by the proposed
action.
References
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment for Renewal
of Special Nuclear Material License No.
SNM–124,’’ January 1999, ADAMS
Accession No. ML050600258.
2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment for
Proposed License Amendments to
Special Nuclear Material License No.
SNM–124 Regarding Downblending and
Oxide Conversion of Surplus HighEnriched Uranium,’’ June 2002, ADAMS
Accession No. ML050540096.
3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact for the BLEU
Preparation Facility,’’ September 2003,
ADAMS Accession No. ML032390428.
4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
‘‘Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact for the Oxide
Conversion Building and the Effluent
Processing Building at the BLEU
Complex,’’ June 2004, ADAMS Accession
No. ML041470176.
5. Nuclear Fuel Services, ‘‘Request for One-
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of April 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter J. Habighorst,
Chief, Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division
of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–10828 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR
The ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR
will hold a meeting on May 18–19,
2010, Room T–2B1, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
a portion that may be closed to protect
information that is proprietary to
General Electric-Hitachi Nuclear
Americas, LLC (GEH) and its contractors
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Tuesday, May 18, 2010—8:30 a.m.
until 5 p.m.; Wednesday, May 19,
2010—8:30 a.m.–12 p.m.
The Subcommittee will discuss
Chapters 4, 8, 6, and 9 of the Safety
Evaluation Report associated with the
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices
ESBWR design certification; Topical
Reports related to fuel design; and the
resolution of control room habitability
issues. The Subcommittee will hear
presentations by and hold discussions
with representatives of the NRC staff,
GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, and other
interested persons regarding this matter.
The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Mr. Christopher
Brown (Telephone 301–415–7111 or
E-mail Christopher.Brown@nrc.gov) five
days prior to the meeting, if possible, so
that appropriate arrangements can be
made. Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be e-mailed to the DFO one day
before the meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Detailed
procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2010, (74 FR 58268–58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the website cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major
inconvenience.
Dated: April 28, 2010.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–10817 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:19 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on Regulatory
Policies and Practices
The ACRS Subcommittee on
Regulatory Policies and Practices will
hold a meeting on May 19, 2010, Room
T–2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Wednesday, May 19, 2010—1 p.m.
until 5 p.m.
The Subcommittee will review Draft
Final Regulatory Guide 1.216
(previously DG–1203) ‘‘Containment
Structural Integrity Evaluation for
Internal Pressure Loadings Above
Design-Basis Pressure’’. The DG was
issued for public comment and
subsequently revised in order to
incorporate some of the public
comments and/or to improve on the
newly proposed guidelines. The
Subcommittee will hear presentations
by and hold discussions with
representatives of the NRC staff, and
other interested persons regarding this
matter. The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Mrs. Zena
Abdullahi (Telephone 301–415–8716 or
E-mail Zena.Abdullahi@nrc.gov) five
days prior to the meeting, if possible, so
that appropriate arrangements can be
made. Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be emailed to the DFO one day
before the meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Detailed
procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2010, (74 FR 58268–58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25303
rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the website cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major
inconvenience.
Dated: April 28, 2010.
Antonio Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–10825 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2010–40, CP2010–41,
CP2010–42, CP2010–43, CP2010–44,
CP2010–45 and CP2010–46; Order No. 451]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service filing to
add new Global Expedited Packages
Services 2 products to the Competitive
Product List. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with the
filing.
DATES:
Comments are due: May 10,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On April 29, 2010, the Postal Service
filed a notice announcing that it has
entered into seven additional Global
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25302-25303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10817]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR
The ACRS Subcommittee on ESBWR will hold a meeting on May 18-19,
2010, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the
exception of a portion that may be closed to protect information that
is proprietary to General Electric-Hitachi Nuclear Americas, LLC (GEH)
and its contractors pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
Tuesday, May 18, 2010--8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.; Wednesday, May 19,
2010--8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.
The Subcommittee will discuss Chapters 4, 8, 6, and 9 of the Safety
Evaluation Report associated with the
[[Page 25303]]
ESBWR design certification; Topical Reports related to fuel design; and
the resolution of control room habitability issues. The Subcommittee
will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of
the NRC staff, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, and other interested persons
regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information,
analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official (DFO),
Mr. Christopher Brown (Telephone 301-415-7111 or E-mail
Christopher.Brown@nrc.gov) five days prior to the meeting, if possible,
so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Thirty-five hard copies
of each presentation or handout should be provided to the DFO thirty
minutes before the meeting. In addition, one electronic copy of each
presentation should be e-mailed to the DFO one day before the meeting.
If an electronic copy cannot be provided within this timeframe,
presenters should provide the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were published in the Federal Register
on October 14, 2010, (74 FR 58268-58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting transcripts are available on
the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs.
Information regarding topics to be discussed, changes to the agenda,
whether the meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the time
allotted to present oral statements can be obtained from the website
cited above or by contacting the identified DFO. Moreover, in view of
the possibility that the schedule for ACRS meetings may be adjusted by
the Chairman as necessary to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major inconvenience.
Dated: April 28, 2010.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010-10817 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P