Safety Zone; KFOG Kaboom, Fireworks Display, San Francisco, CA, 25111-25113 [2010-10772]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§706.2
SUMMARY: This document corrects the
DATES section of an interim final rule
published on Friday, April 23, 2010. In
the interim rule, the Bureau of Prisons
(Bureau) revised its regulations
regarding inmate contact with the
community to remove two current
Bureau regulations that prohibit inmates
from publishing under a byline, due to
a recent court ruling invalidating
Bureau regulation language containing
this prohibition. The April 23, 2010,
publication inadvertently omitted an
effective date.
DATES: The interim final rule published
April 23, 2010, at 75 FR 21163, is
effective May 7, 2010. Comments are
due by June 22nd, 2010.
Rules Unit, Office of
General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320
First Street, NW., Washington, DC
20534.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document corrects the DATES section
of
the publication on Friday, April 23,
2010 (75 FR 21163). The DATES section
of that document should read as
follows: ‘‘This rule is effective on [insert
date of publication]. Comments are due
by June 22nd, 2010.’’ However, because
that document did not include an
effective date, this document announces
the effective date of those provisions.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 540
Prisoners.
Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. 2010–10727 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972;
Correction
Correction
In rule document 2010–4666
beginning on page 10413 in the issue of
Monday, March 8, 2010 make the
following correction:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
[Corrected]
Regulatory Information
On page 10413, in §706.2, in the table,
under the heading ‘‘Number’’, ‘‘CG 59’’
should read ‘‘CG 58’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2010–4666 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0162]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; KFOG Kaboom,
Fireworks Display, San Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters in San Francisco
Bay in San Francisco, CA, in support of
the KFOG Kaboom Fireworks Display.
This safety zone is established to ensure
the safety of participants and spectators
from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without permission of
the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:45
a.m. on May 20, 2010, through 9:30 p.m.
on May 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0162 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0162 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, pressing Enter, and then clicking
‘‘Search.’’ They are also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Ensign Liezl Nicholas at 415–
399–7442, or e-mail D11–PF–
MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
25111
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists, as publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule would be
impracticable because the event would
occur before the rulemaking process
would be completed. Because of the
dangers posed by the pyrotechnics used
in these fireworks displays, the safety
zones are necessary to provide for the
safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels
transiting the event area. For the safety
concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in
effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay in the effective date
of this rule would expose mariners to
the dangers posed by the pyrotechnics
used in the fireworks display.
Basis and Purpose
The radio station KFOG will sponsor
the KFOG Kaboom Fireworks Display
on May 22, 2010, on the navigable
waters of San Francisco Bay, CA. The
fireworks display is meant for
entertainment purposes. This safety
zone establishes a temporary restricted
area on the waters surrounding the
fireworks launch site during loading of
the pyrotechnics, and during the
fireworks displays. This restricted area
around the launch site is necessary to
protect spectators, vessels, and other
property from the hazards associated
with the pyrotechnics on the fireworks
barges. The Coast Guard has granted the
event sponsor a marine event permit for
the fireworks displays.
Discussion of Rule
From 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010,
during the set up of the fireworks and
until the start of the fireworks displays,
the temporary safety zone applies to the
navigable waters around the fireworks
sites within a radius of 100 feet. From
9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m., the area to which
the temporary safety zone applies will
increase in size to encompass the
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
25112
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
navigable waters around the fireworks
launch site within a radius of 1,000 feet.
The fireworks launch site will be
located at 37°42′21.20″ N, 122°23′3.46″
W.
The effect of the temporary safety
zones will be to restrict navigation in
the vicinity of the fireworks sites while
the fireworks are set up, and until the
conclusion of the scheduled displays.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations
are needed to keep spectators and
vessels a safe distance away from the
fireworks barges to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zones, the effect of this rule will not be
significant. The entities most likely to
be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities. In addition, the
rule will only restrict access for a
limited time. Last but not least, the
Public Broadcast Notice to Mariners will
notify the users of local waterway to
ensure that the safety zone will result in
minimum impact.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Although this rule may affect owners
and operators of pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and
sightseeing, it will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for several
reasons: (i) This rule will encompass
only a small portion of the waterway for
a limited period of time; (ii) vessel
traffic can pass safely around the area;
(iii) vessels engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing have ample
space outside of the affected areas of
San Francisco, CA to engage in these
activities; and (iv) the maritime public
will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–306 to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 165.T11–306 Safety Zone; KFOG
Kaboom, Fireworks Display, San Francisco,
CA.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established for a portion of the
waters of San Francisco Bay in San
Francisco, CA. The fireworks launch
sites are located in position:
37°42′21.20″ N, 122°23′3.46″ W (NAD
83). From 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010,
until 9 p.m. on May 22, 2010, the
temporary safety zone extends to the
navigable waters around the fireworks
launch sites within a radius of 100 feet.
From 9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on May 22,
2010, the area to which the temporary
safety zones extends encompasses the
navigable waters within a radius of
1,000 feet around the fireworks launch
sites.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zones on VHF–16 or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010
through 9:30 p.m. on May 22, 2010.
25113
47 CFR Part 54
Dated: April 16, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010–10772 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[WC Docket No. 05–337, CC Docket No. 96–
45; FCC 10–57]
High-Cost Universal Service Support,
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Lifeline and Link-Up
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) concludes that dramatic
increases in telephone subscribership in
Puerto Rico over the last several years
make it unnecessary to adopt a new
high-cost support mechanism for nonrural insular carriers as proposed by
Puerto Rico Telephone Company. The
Commission finds that the existing nonrural high-cost support mechanism,
operating in conjunction with the
Commission’s other universal service
programs, is successfully increasing
telephone subscribership in Puerto Rico
and satisfies the requirements of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, with respect to Puerto Rico.
The Commission believes that the
public would be best served by our
focusing on comprehensive universal
service reform, rather than developing a
new non-rural insular high-cost support
mechanism within the existing legacy
universal service system.
DATES: Effective June 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted
Burmeister, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Telecommunications Access
Policy Division, (202) 418–7389 or TTY:
(202) 418–0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Order in
WC Docket No. 05–337, CC Docket No.
96–45, WC Docket No. 03–109, FCC 10–
57, adopted April 16, 2010, and released
April 16, 2010. This Order was also
released with a companion Proposed
Rule document that is published
elsewhere in this Federal Register issue.
The complete text of this document is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. The
document may also be purchased from
the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800)
378–3160 or (202) 863- 2893, facsimile
(202) 863–2898, or via the Internet at
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25111-25113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10772]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0162]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; KFOG Kaboom, Fireworks Display, San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters in San Francisco Bay in San Francisco, CA, in support
of the KFOG Kaboom Fireworks Display. This safety zone is established
to ensure the safety of participants and spectators from the dangers
associated with the pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the
safety zone without permission of the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010, through
9:30 p.m. on May 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0162 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0162 in the
``Keyword'' box, pressing Enter, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are
also available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Ensign Liezl Nicholas at 415-399-7442, or e-mail
D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists, as publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule would be impracticable because the event would
occur before the rulemaking process would be completed. Because of the
dangers posed by the pyrotechnics used in these fireworks displays, the
safety zones are necessary to provide for the safety of event
participants, spectators, spectator craft, and other vessels transiting
the event area. For the safety concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay in the effective date of
this rule would expose mariners to the dangers posed by the
pyrotechnics used in the fireworks display.
Basis and Purpose
The radio station KFOG will sponsor the KFOG Kaboom Fireworks
Display on May 22, 2010, on the navigable waters of San Francisco Bay,
CA. The fireworks display is meant for entertainment purposes. This
safety zone establishes a temporary restricted area on the waters
surrounding the fireworks launch site during loading of the
pyrotechnics, and during the fireworks displays. This restricted area
around the launch site is necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and
other property from the hazards associated with the pyrotechnics on the
fireworks barges. The Coast Guard has granted the event sponsor a
marine event permit for the fireworks displays.
Discussion of Rule
From 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010, during the set up of the fireworks
and until the start of the fireworks displays, the temporary safety
zone applies to the navigable waters around the fireworks sites within
a radius of 100 feet. From 9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m., the area to which
the temporary safety zone applies will increase in size to encompass
the
[[Page 25112]]
navigable waters around the fireworks launch site within a radius of
1,000 feet. The fireworks launch site will be located at
37[deg]42'21.20'' N, 122[deg]23'3.46'' W.
The effect of the temporary safety zones will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the fireworks sites while the fireworks
are set up, and until the conclusion of the scheduled displays. Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep spectators and vessels a safe distance
away from the fireworks barges to ensure the safety of participants,
spectators, and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zones, the effect of this rule will not be significant. The
entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities. In addition, the rule will only restrict
access for a limited time. Last but not least, the Public Broadcast
Notice to Mariners will notify the users of local waterway to ensure
that the safety zone will result in minimum impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Although this rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure
craft engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing, it will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for several reasons: (i) This rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway for a limited period of time; (ii) vessel
traffic can pass safely around the area; (iii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing have ample space outside of the
affected areas of San Francisco, CA to engage in these activities; and
(iv) the maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety zone
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
[[Page 25113]]
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-306 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-306 Safety Zone; KFOG Kaboom, Fireworks Display, San
Francisco, CA.
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established for a
portion of the waters of San Francisco Bay in San Francisco, CA. The
fireworks launch sites are located in position: 37[deg]42'21.20'' N,
122[deg]23'3.46'' W (NAD 83). From 7:45 a.m. on May 20, 2010, until 9
p.m. on May 22, 2010, the temporary safety zone extends to the
navigable waters around the fireworks launch sites within a radius of
100 feet. From 9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on May 22, 2010, the area to
which the temporary safety zones extends encompasses the navigable
waters within a radius of 1,000 feet around the fireworks launch sites.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec. 165.23,
entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zones on VHF-16 or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is effective from 7:45 a.m. on
May 20, 2010 through 9:30 p.m. on May 22, 2010.
Dated: April 16, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010-10772 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P