Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Department of Defense (DoD); Restriction on Ball and Roller Bearings, 25167-25169 [2010-10766]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
4. Revise section 242.503–2 to read as
follows:
242.503–2 Postaward conference
procedure.
(a) DD Form 1484, Post-Award
Conference Record, may be used in
conducting the conference and in
preparing the conference report.
(b) For contracts that include the
clause at 252.234–70YY, postaward
conferences shall include a discussion
of the Contractor’s standard Cost and
Software Data Reporting (CSDR) process
that satisfies the guidelines contained in
the CSDR Manual DoD 5000.04–M–1
and the requirements in the Government
approved contract CSDR plan, DD Form
2794, Cost and Software Data Reporting
Plan and related Resource Distribution
Table, and DD Form 1921–3, Contractor
Business Data Report.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
5. Add section 252.234–70XX to read
as follows:
252.234 70XX Notice of Cost and Software
Data Reporting System.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
As prescribed in 234.7101(a), use the
following provision:
NOTICE OF COST AND SOFTWARE DATA
REPORTING SYSTEM (DATE)
(a) The offeror shall—
(1) Describe the standard Cost and
Software Data Reporting (CSDR) process that
it intends to use to satisfy the requirements
of the CSDR Manual, DoD 5000.04–M–1, and
the Government-approved contract CSDR
plan, DD Form 2794 and related Resource
Distribution Table contained in the
solicitation. For Contractor Cost and Data
Reporting (CCDR) application, the
description will demonstrate how reports are
based, to the maximum extent possible, upon
actual cost transactions and not cost
allocations. The description will also show
how the data from the offeror’s accounting
system will be mapped into the standard
reporting categories required in the
Contractor CCDR data item descriptions. The
document shall also describe how the offeror
segregates recurring and nonrecurring costs;
(2) Provide comments on the adequacy of
the CSDR contract plan and related Resource
Distribution Table contained in the
solicitation; and
(3) Submit the DD Form 1921, Cost Data
Summary Report, DD Form 1921–1,
Functional Cost-Hour Report, and DD Form
1921–2, Progress Curve Report, with its
pricing proposal.
(b) The offeror shall identify the
subcontractors or the subcontracted effort, if
the subcontractors have not been selected, to
whom the CSDR requirements will apply.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
This will be accomplished by providing
comments on the Resource Distribution Table
contained in the solicitation. The offeror
shall be responsible for ensuring the selected
subcontractors comply with the requirements
of the CSDR System. The offeror shall also be
responsible for notifying the Government
prior to changes in subcontractor or planned
subcontract circumstances affecting CSDR
compliance.
(End of provision)
25167
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[DFARS Case 2006–D029]
48 CFR Part 225
RIN 0750–AG57
6. Add section 252.234–70YY to read
as follows:
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Department of
Defense (DoD); Restriction on Ball and
Roller Bearings
252.234 70YY Cost and Software Data
Reporting System.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
As prescribed in 234.7101(b), use the
following clause:
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
revise the domestic source restriction on
acquisition of ball and roller bearings.
The current DFARS restriction on ball
and roller bearings requires that the
bearings and the main bearing
components be manufactured in the
U.S. or Canada. This requirement was
based on the restriction at 10 U.S.C.
2534(a)(5), which expired on October 1,
2005. The proposed revision interprets
the annual defense appropriations act
domestic source restriction on
acquisition of ball and roller bearings in
a manner similar to the domestic source
restriction of the Buy American Act.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted to the address
shown below on or before July 6, 2010,
to be considered in the formulation of
the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2006–D029,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2006–D029 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: 703–602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Amy
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS),
Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
All comments received will be posted
to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/
dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy Williams, 703–602–0328.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING
SYSTEM (DATE)
(a) In the performance of this contract, the
Contractor shall use—
(1) A documented standard Cost and
Software Data Reporting (CSDR) process that
satisfies the guidelines contained in the
CSDR Manual DoD 5000.04–M–1;
(2) Management procedures that provide
for generation of timely and reliable
information for the Contractor Cost Data
Reports (CCDRs) and Software Resources
Data Reports (SRDRs) required by the CCDR
and SRDR data items of the contract. These
procedures will also maximize use of actual
cost transactions rather than cost allocations;
and
(3) The Government-approved contract
CSDR plan, DD Form 2794, Cost and
Software Data Reporting Plan and related
Resource Distribution Table, and DD Form
1921–3, Contractor Business Data Report, as
the basis for reporting in accordance with the
required CSDR data item descriptions (DIDs).
(b) The Contractor shall require the
following subcontractors to comply with the
CSDR requirements:
(Contracting Officer to insert names of
subcontractors (or subcontracted effort if
subcontractors have not been selected)
designated for application of the CSDR
requirement of the clause.)
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2010–10762 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
PO 00000
A. Background
The current DFARS restriction on ball
and roller bearings (225.7009)
implemented two statutory restrictions:
10 U.S.C. 2534(a)(5) and annual
appropriations act restrictions. 10 U.S.C.
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
25168
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
2534(a)(5) required that all ball and
roller bearings and bearing components,
either as end items or components of
end items, be wholly manufactured in
the United States or Canada. The annual
defense appropriations act restrictions
require that all ball and roller bearings
be produced by a domestic source and
be of domestic origin. This restriction
does not apply to the acquisition of
commercial items (either as components
or end products), unless the commercial
bearings themselves are purchased as
the end products.
In the context of DFARS Part 225, the
DAR Council always interprets the term
‘‘domestic’’ to include Canada, unless
the statute specifically provides
otherwise. Canada is part of the national
technology and industrial base as
defined at 10 U.S.C. 2500. Congress has
never objected to this interpretation of
the term ‘‘domestic.’’
Since the restriction at 10 U.S.C.
2534(a)(5) was considered to be more
stringent than the annual defense
appropriations act restriction, the
DFARS requirements that the bearing
and the main bearing components must
be 100 percent manufactured in the U.S.
or Canada was based on 10 U.S.C.
2534(a)(5). 10 U.S.C 2534(a)(5) expired
on October 1, 2005.
It is more and more difficult to
acquire commercial bearings in which
all the main bearing components are 100
percent manufactured in the U.S. or
Canada. U.S. and Canadian
manufacturers of commercial bearings
are increasingly going offshore for
components, such as retainers, that do
not represent the core competency of
the bearing manufacturer. It is often not
possible to obtain domestic commercial
bearings that do not contain some
nondomestic components. The
Government does not constitute a large
enough share of the market to influence
significantly this decision by
manufacturers of commercial bearings.
Therefore, this rule proposes to revise
the restriction to implement the annual
defense appropriations act restriction in
a way that will allow more flexibility
with regard to the source of bearing
components.
The DAR Council interprets the
phrase ‘‘produced by a domestic source
and of domestic origin’’ to mean that a
ball or roller bearing must be
manufactured in the U.S. or Canada
(domestic source) and the cost of its
U.S. and Canadian components must
exceed 50 percent of the cost of all its
components (of domestic origin). This
interpretation is comparable to
implementation of the Buy American
Act and to some of the other domestic
source restrictions in the DFARS. For
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
example, anchor and mooring chain is
an appropriations act restriction that
also requires the item to be
manufactured in the U.S. with the cost
of the components manufactured in the
U.S. required to exceed 50 percent of
the total cost of components. It is
reasonable to apply the component test
similarly to ball and roller bearings to
establish that the bearing is of domestic
origin.
This rule was subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DOD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
However, because this rule has impact
on the application of domestic source
restrictions, DoD has performed an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
which is summarized as follows:
The objective of the rule is to allow
more flexibility to domestic bearings
manufacturers in the acquisition of
nondomestic components. The legal
basis for the rule is Section 8065 of the
Fiscal Year 2002 DoD Appropriations
Act (Pub. L. 107–117) and the same
restriction in subsequent DoD
appropriations acts.
The final rule affects manufacturers of
bearings, bearing components, and
noncommercial products that
incorporate bearings.
• Bearings. This rule applies only to
bearings purchased as end products or
noncommercial bearings incorporated in
noncommercial end products or
noncommercial components of
noncommercial end products (see TAB
A). Because this rule allows some
element of nondomestic content in ball
and roller bearing components, as long
as the U.S. or Canadian manufactured
bearing contains less than 50 percent
nondomestic bearing components, both
large and small businesses may find
greater numbers of sources from which
to obtain ball and roller bearing
components. Greater sourcing choices
may enable small businesses to compete
more successfully for DOD ball and
roller bearing acquisitions.
• Bearing components. Manufacturers
of domestic bearing components may
face increased competition from
manufacturers of nondomestic bearing
components. However, many of the
bearing components that are being
outsourced are no longer readily
available from domestic sources.
• Manufacturers of noncommercial
products incorporating bearings.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Manufacturers of noncommercial
products incorporating bearings (both
large and small businesses) will find it
easier to acquire domestic bearings and
will less frequently need to request
nonavailability determinations (see TAB
B).
The proposed rule imposes no
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
information collection requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
There are no known significant
alternatives to the rule that would meet
the requirements of the statute and
minimize any significant economic
impact of the rule on small entities. The
impact of this rule on small business is
expected to be predominantly positive.
DoD invites comments from small
businesses and other interested parties.
DoD also will consider comments from
small entities concerning the affected
DFARS subparts in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 610. Such comments should be
submitted separately and should cite
DFARS Case 2006–D029.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
any new or modified information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR part 225 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 225 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
2. Revise section 225.7009–2 to read
as follows:
225.7009–2
Restriction.
(a) Do not acquire ball and roller
bearings unless—
(1) The bearings are manufactured in
the United States or Canada; and
(2) For each ball or roller bearing, the
cost of the bearing components mined,
produced, or manufactured in the
United States or Canada exceeds 50
percent of the total cost of the bearing
components of that ball or roller
bearing.
(b) The restriction at 225.7002–1(b)
may also apply to bearings that are
made from specialty metals, such as
high carbon chrome steel (bearing steel).
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Proposed Rules
3. Revise section 252.225–7016 to
read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
252.225–7016 Restriction on Acquisition
of Ball and Roller Bearings.
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
As prescribed in 225.7009–5, use the
following clause:
49 CFR Part 594
RESTRICTION ON ACQUISITION OF BALL
AND ROLLER BEARINGS (DATE)
RIN 2127–AK70
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
(1) Bearing component means the bearing
element, retainer, inner race, or outer race.
(2) Component, other than a bearing
component, means any item supplied to the
Government as part of an end product or of
another component.
(3) End product means supplies delivered
under a line item of this contract.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of
this clause—
(1) Each ball and roller bearing delivered
under this contract shall be manufactured in
the United States, its outlying areas, or
Canada; and
(2) For each ball or roller bearing, the cost
of the bearing components mined, produced,
or manufactured in the United States or
Canada shall exceed 50 percent of the total
cost of the bearing components of that ball
or roller bearing.
(c) The restriction in paragraph (b) of this
clause does not apply to ball or roller
bearings that are acquired as—
(1) Commercial components of a
noncommercial end product; or
(2) Commercial or noncommercial
components of a commercial component of a
noncommercial end product.
(d) The restriction in paragraph (b) of this
clause may be waived upon request from the
Contractor in accordance with subsection
225.7009–4 of the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
(e) If this contract includes DFARS clause
252.225–7009, Restriction on Acquisition of
Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals,
all bearings that contain specialty metals, as
defined in that clause, must meet the
requirements of that clause.
(f) The Contractor shall insert the
substance of this clause, including this
paragraph (f), in all subcontracts, except
those for—
(1) Commercial items; or
(2) Items that do not contain ball or roller
bearings.
(End of clause)
Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49
U.S.C. 30141
[FR Doc. 2010–10766 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 May 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
[Docket No. NHTSA 2010–0035; Notice 1]
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document proposes fees
for Fiscal Year 2011 and until further
notice, as authorized by 49 U.S.C.
30141, relating to the registration of
importers and the importation of motor
vehicles not certified as conforming to
the Federal motor vehicle safety
standards (FMVSS). These fees are
needed to maintain the registered
importer (RI) program.
DATES: You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that
Docket Management receives them no
later than June 7, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25169
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Lindsay, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5291).
For legal issues, you may call Nicholas
Englund, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA (202–366–5263). You may call
Docket Management at 202–366–9324.
You may visit the Docket in person from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On June 24, 1996, at 61 FR 32411, we
published a notice that discussed in full
the rulemaking history of 49 CFR part
594 and the fees authorized by the
Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance
Act of 1988, Public Law 100–562, since
recodified at 49 U.S.C. 30141–47. The
reader is referred to that notice for
background information relating to this
rulemaking action. Certain fees were
initially established to become effective
January 31, 1990, and have been
periodically adjusted since then.
We are required to review and make
appropriate adjustments at least every
two years in the fees established for the
administration of the RI program. See 49
U.S.C. 30141(e). The fees applicable in
any fiscal year (FY) are to be established
before the beginning of such year. Ibid.
We are proposing fees that would
become effective on October 1, 2010, the
beginning of FY 2011. The statute
authorizes fees to cover the costs of the
importer registration program, to cover
the cost of making import eligibility
decisions, and to cover the cost of
processing the bonds furnished to the
Department of Homeland Security
(Customs). We last amended the fee
schedule in 2008. See final rule
published on September 24, 2008 at 73
FR 54981. Those fees apply to Fiscal
Years 2009 and 2010.
The proposed fees are based on time
and costs associated with the tasks for
which the fees are assessed and reflect
the increase in hourly costs in the past
two fiscal years attributable to the
approximately 4.78 and 2.42 percent
raises (including the locality adjustment
for Washington, DC) in salaries of
employees on the General Schedule that
became effective on January 1, 2009,
and on January 1, 2010, respectively.
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25167-25169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10766]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
[DFARS Case 2006-D029]
48 CFR Part 225
RIN 0750-AG57
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Department of
Defense (DoD); Restriction on Ball and Roller Bearings
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to revise the domestic source restriction
on acquisition of ball and roller bearings. The current DFARS
restriction on ball and roller bearings requires that the bearings and
the main bearing components be manufactured in the U.S. or Canada. This
requirement was based on the restriction at 10 U.S.C. 2534(a)(5), which
expired on October 1, 2005. The proposed revision interprets the annual
defense appropriations act domestic source restriction on acquisition
of ball and roller bearings in a manner similar to the domestic source
restriction of the Buy American Act.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted to the address
shown below on or before July 6, 2010, to be considered in the
formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2006-D029,
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2006-D029 in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: 703-602-0350.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Ms.
Amy Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
All comments received will be posted to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, 703-602-0328.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The current DFARS restriction on ball and roller bearings
(225.7009) implemented two statutory restrictions: 10 U.S.C. 2534(a)(5)
and annual appropriations act restrictions. 10 U.S.C.
[[Page 25168]]
2534(a)(5) required that all ball and roller bearings and bearing
components, either as end items or components of end items, be wholly
manufactured in the United States or Canada. The annual defense
appropriations act restrictions require that all ball and roller
bearings be produced by a domestic source and be of domestic origin.
This restriction does not apply to the acquisition of commercial items
(either as components or end products), unless the commercial bearings
themselves are purchased as the end products.
In the context of DFARS Part 225, the DAR Council always interprets
the term ``domestic'' to include Canada, unless the statute
specifically provides otherwise. Canada is part of the national
technology and industrial base as defined at 10 U.S.C. 2500. Congress
has never objected to this interpretation of the term ``domestic.''
Since the restriction at 10 U.S.C. 2534(a)(5) was considered to be
more stringent than the annual defense appropriations act restriction,
the DFARS requirements that the bearing and the main bearing components
must be 100 percent manufactured in the U.S. or Canada was based on 10
U.S.C. 2534(a)(5). 10 U.S.C 2534(a)(5) expired on October 1, 2005.
It is more and more difficult to acquire commercial bearings in
which all the main bearing components are 100 percent manufactured in
the U.S. or Canada. U.S. and Canadian manufacturers of commercial
bearings are increasingly going offshore for components, such as
retainers, that do not represent the core competency of the bearing
manufacturer. It is often not possible to obtain domestic commercial
bearings that do not contain some nondomestic components. The
Government does not constitute a large enough share of the market to
influence significantly this decision by manufacturers of commercial
bearings.
Therefore, this rule proposes to revise the restriction to
implement the annual defense appropriations act restriction in a way
that will allow more flexibility with regard to the source of bearing
components.
The DAR Council interprets the phrase ``produced by a domestic
source and of domestic origin'' to mean that a ball or roller bearing
must be manufactured in the U.S. or Canada (domestic source) and the
cost of its U.S. and Canadian components must exceed 50 percent of the
cost of all its components (of domestic origin). This interpretation is
comparable to implementation of the Buy American Act and to some of the
other domestic source restrictions in the DFARS. For example, anchor
and mooring chain is an appropriations act restriction that also
requires the item to be manufactured in the U.S. with the cost of the
components manufactured in the U.S. required to exceed 50 percent of
the total cost of components. It is reasonable to apply the component
test similarly to ball and roller bearings to establish that the
bearing is of domestic origin.
This rule was subject to Office of Management and Budget review
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DOD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, because this
rule has impact on the application of domestic source restrictions, DoD
has performed an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, which is
summarized as follows:
The objective of the rule is to allow more flexibility to domestic
bearings manufacturers in the acquisition of nondomestic components.
The legal basis for the rule is Section 8065 of the Fiscal Year 2002
DoD Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 107-117) and the same restriction in
subsequent DoD appropriations acts.
The final rule affects manufacturers of bearings, bearing
components, and noncommercial products that incorporate bearings.
Bearings. This rule applies only to bearings purchased as
end products or noncommercial bearings incorporated in noncommercial
end products or noncommercial components of noncommercial end products
(see TAB A). Because this rule allows some element of nondomestic
content in ball and roller bearing components, as long as the U.S. or
Canadian manufactured bearing contains less than 50 percent nondomestic
bearing components, both large and small businesses may find greater
numbers of sources from which to obtain ball and roller bearing
components. Greater sourcing choices may enable small businesses to
compete more successfully for DOD ball and roller bearing acquisitions.
Bearing components. Manufacturers of domestic bearing
components may face increased competition from manufacturers of
nondomestic bearing components. However, many of the bearing components
that are being outsourced are no longer readily available from domestic
sources.
Manufacturers of noncommercial products incorporating
bearings. Manufacturers of noncommercial products incorporating
bearings (both large and small businesses) will find it easier to
acquire domestic bearings and will less frequently need to request
nonavailability determinations (see TAB B).
The proposed rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other
information collection requirements. The rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules. There are no known
significant alternatives to the rule that would meet the requirements
of the statute and minimize any significant economic impact of the rule
on small entities. The impact of this rule on small business is
expected to be predominantly positive.
DoD invites comments from small businesses and other interested
parties. DoD also will consider comments from small entities concerning
the affected DFARS subparts in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such
comments should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case
2006-D029.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose any new or modified information
collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR part 225 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 225 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
2. Revise section 225.7009-2 to read as follows:
225.7009-2 Restriction.
(a) Do not acquire ball and roller bearings unless--
(1) The bearings are manufactured in the United States or Canada;
and
(2) For each ball or roller bearing, the cost of the bearing
components mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or
Canada exceeds 50 percent of the total cost of the bearing components
of that ball or roller bearing.
(b) The restriction at 225.7002-1(b) may also apply to bearings
that are made from specialty metals, such as high carbon chrome steel
(bearing steel).
[[Page 25169]]
3. Revise section 252.225-7016 to read as follows:
252.225-7016 Restriction on Acquisition of Ball and Roller Bearings.
As prescribed in 225.7009-5, use the following clause:
RESTRICTION ON ACQUISITION OF BALL AND ROLLER BEARINGS (DATE)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
(1) Bearing component means the bearing element, retainer, inner
race, or outer race.
(2) Component, other than a bearing component, means any item
supplied to the Government as part of an end product or of another
component.
(3) End product means supplies delivered under a line item of
this contract.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause--
(1) Each ball and roller bearing delivered under this contract
shall be manufactured in the United States, its outlying areas, or
Canada; and
(2) For each ball or roller bearing, the cost of the bearing
components mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or
Canada shall exceed 50 percent of the total cost of the bearing
components of that ball or roller bearing.
(c) The restriction in paragraph (b) of this clause does not
apply to ball or roller bearings that are acquired as--
(1) Commercial components of a noncommercial end product; or
(2) Commercial or noncommercial components of a commercial
component of a noncommercial end product.
(d) The restriction in paragraph (b) of this clause may be
waived upon request from the Contractor in accordance with
subsection 225.7009-4 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement.
(e) If this contract includes DFARS clause 252.225-7009,
Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty
Metals, all bearings that contain specialty metals, as defined in
that clause, must meet the requirements of that clause.
(f) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause,
including this paragraph (f), in all subcontracts, except those
for--
(1) Commercial items; or
(2) Items that do not contain ball or roller bearings.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2010-10766 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P