Safety Zone; Tri-City Water Follies Hydroplane Races Practice Sessions, Columbia River, Kennewick, WA, 24799-24801 [2010-10613]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: April 28, 2010.
S. Venckus,
Office of Regulations and Administrative Law
(CG–0943), U.S. Coast Guard.
background checks of the FBI Central
Records System through the National
Name Check Program pursuant to the
authority in Pub. L. 101–515 and in
accordance with paragraphs (e)(1), (2)
and (3) of this section.
[FR Doc. 2010–10606 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am]
24799
purposes of enforcement from April 7, 2010,
through May 31, 2010.’’
3. On page 20296, in the third
column, revise amendatory instruction
number 2 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[FR Doc. 2010–10628 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am]
‘‘2. In Sec. 100.501, suspend line No. 31
and 38 in the Table to Sec. 100.501 from
April 17, 2010 through June 1, 2010.’’
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Dated: April 26, 2010.
Robert S. Mueller, III,
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
4. On page 20296, in the third column
revise amendatory instruction number 3
to read as follows:
Coast Guard
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
‘‘3. In Sec. 100.501 add lines No. 58 and
59 in Table to Sec. 100.501 to read as
follows:’’
33 CFR Part 100
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0102]
RIN 1625–AA08
Coast Guard
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Events; Temporary Change of Dates
for Recurring Marine Events in the
Fifth Coast Guard District; Correction
Dated: April 28, 2010.
S. Venckus,
Office of Regulations and Administrative Law
(CG–0943), U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2010–10602 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am]
33 CFR Part 100
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0081]
ACTION: Temporary final rule;
correction.
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Chester River, Chestertown,
MD; Correction
Temporary final rule;
correction.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In the Federal Register
published on April 23, 2010, the Coast
Guard established special local
regulations during the reenactment
portion of the ‘‘Chestertown Tea Party
Festival.’’ The Chestertown Tea Party
Festival is a marine event to be held on
the waters of the Chester River,
Chestertown, MD on May 29, 2010. The
special local regulation published with
an error in the heading, specifically, the
CFR title and part in the heading should
have read ‘‘33 CFR Part 100,’’ instead of
‘‘33 CFR Part 165.’’
DATES: This correction is effective May
6, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this correction,
contact Kevin d’Eustachio, Office of
Regulations and Administrative Law,
(202) 372–3854
kevin.m.deustachio@uscg.mil. For
information about the original
regulation, contact Mr. Ronald Houck,
Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (410) 576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
In FR doc
2010–9496 appearing on page 21167 in
the issue of Friday, April 23, 2010, the
following corrections are made:
1. In the document heading on page
21167, correct the CFR citation to read
‘‘33 CFR Part 100’’.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 May 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
SUMMARY: In the Federal Register
published on April 19, 2010, the Coast
Guard temporarily changed the
enforcement period of two special local
regulations for recurring marine events
in the Fifth Coast Guard District, one on
April 17–18, 2010, and one on May 29–
30, 2010. That publication contained
several errors. These errors do not
impact the events scheduled for this
year, but could cause confusion about
future years.
DATES: This correction is effective May
6, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this correction,
contact Kevin d’Eustachio, Office of
Regulations and Administrative Law,
telephone (202) 372–3854, e-mail
kevin.m.deustachio@uscg.mil. For
information about the original
regulation, contact LT Tiffany Duffy,
Project Manager, Sector Hampton
Roads, Waterways Management
Division, United States Coast Guard;
telephone (757) 668–5580, e-mail
Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil.
Coast Guard
In FR doc
2010–8861 appearing on page 20294 in
the issue of Monday, April 19, 2010, the
following corrections are made:
1. In the summary on page 20294, in
the first column, remove the words
‘‘proposes to temporarily change’’ and
add in their place the words
‘‘temporarily changes’’.
2. On page 20294, in the third
column, revise the ‘‘DATES’’ section to
read as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
‘‘DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
April 19, 2010, through May 31, 2010. This
rule is effective with actual notice for
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0277]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Tri-City Water Follies
Hydroplane Races Practice Sessions,
Columbia River, Kennewick, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Columbia River in Kennewick,
Washington for hydroplane race
practice sessions being held in
preparation for the Tri-City Water
Follies Hydroplane Races. The safety
zone is necessary to help ensure the
safety of the practice session
participants as well as the maritime
public and will do so by prohibiting all
persons and vessels from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
May 7, 2010 through 5:30 p.m. May 8,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0277 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0277 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
24800
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Portland; telephone
503–240–9319, e-mail
Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do
otherwise would be contrary to the
public interest because immediate
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life and property on navigable
waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to public interest
because hazards associated with the
hydroplane practice sessions could lead
to severe injury, fatalities, and/or
destruction of public property.
Therefore, immediate action is needed
to ensure the public’s safety.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Basis and Purpose
The Tri-City Water Follies
Association hosts annual hydroplane
races on the Columbia River in
Kennewick, Washington. The
Association is planning to hold practice
sessions prior to the event for race
participants. The practice sessions will
be conducted daily on May 7 and May
8, 2010 from 7 a.m. through 5:30 p.m.
Due to the safety hazards inherent with
such events, a safety zone is necessary
to help ensure the safety of the practice
session participants as well as the
maritime public.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 May 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone created by this rule
encompasses all waters bounded by two
lines drawn from shore to shore on the
Columbia River, and is approximately 2
miles in length beginning at the Pioneer
Memorial Bridge at the point where U.S.
Route 395 crosses the Columbia River;
the first line running between position
46°14′07″ N, 119°10′42″ W and position
46°13′42″ N, 119°10′51″ W and the
second line running between position
46°13′35″ N, 119°07′34″ W and position
46°13′10″ N, 119°07′47″ W.
The safety zone will be in effect daily
from 7 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. on May 7,
2010 and May 8, 2010. All persons and
vessels will be prohibited from entering
or remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this regulation will
restrict access to the area, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
The safety zone will only be in effect for
a limited time and maritime traffic will
be able to transit the safety zone at
designated intervals throughout that
time period and as otherwise authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities some of which may be small
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in the area
covered by the safety zone. The rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, however, because the safety
zone will only be in effect for a limited
time and maritime traffic will be able to
transit the safety zone at designated
intervals throughout that time period
and as otherwise authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 May 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
24801
in length bounded by two lines drawn
from shore to shore on the Columbia
River; the first line running between
position 46° 14′07″ N, 119°10′42″ W and
position 46°13′42″ N, 119°10′51″ W and
the second line running between
position 46°13′35″ N, 119°07′34″ W and
position 46°13′10″ N, 119°07′47″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone detailed in
paragraph (a) of this section or bring,
cause to be brought, or allow to remain
in the safety zone detailed in paragraph
(a) of this section any vehicle, vessel, or
object unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative. See 33 CFR Part 165,
Subpart C, for additional information
and requirements.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety
zone detailed in paragraph (a) of this
section will be in effect daily from 7
a.m. through 5:30 p.m. on May 7, 2010
and May 8, 2010.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010–10613 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 251
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Special Uses
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
AGENCY:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–139 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–139 Safety Zone; Tri-City Water
Follies Hydroplane Races Practice
Sessions, Columbia River, Kennewick, WA
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters encompassed
within the area approximately two miles
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
Correcting amendment.
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to the final rule governing
the Forest Service’s Special Use
Program that was published in the
Federal Register on March 26, 2010 (75
FR 14495).
DATES: Effective on May 6, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julett Denton, Lands Special Uses
Program Manager, (202) 205–1256.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This correction adds paragraphs (A),
(B), (C), and (D) to § 251.60 (a)(2)(i)
which were inadvertently removed from
the final rule and which are necessary
to reflect properly the Forest Service’s
authority to revoke or suspend special
use authorizations under the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 251
Administrative practice and
procedure, Electric power, National
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24799-24801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10613]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0277]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Tri-City Water Follies Hydroplane Races Practice
Sessions, Columbia River, Kennewick, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington for hydroplane race practice
sessions being held in preparation for the Tri-City Water Follies
Hydroplane Races. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the
safety of the practice session participants as well as the maritime
public and will do so by prohibiting all persons and vessels from
entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. May 7, 2010 through 5:30 p.m.
May 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0277 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0277 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground
[[Page 24800]]
Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Portland; telephone 503-240-9319, e-
mail Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do otherwise would be contrary to
the public interest because immediate action is necessary to provide
for the safety of life and property on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to public interest because hazards associated with the
hydroplane practice sessions could lead to severe injury, fatalities,
and/or destruction of public property. Therefore, immediate action is
needed to ensure the public's safety.
Basis and Purpose
The Tri-City Water Follies Association hosts annual hydroplane
races on the Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington. The Association
is planning to hold practice sessions prior to the event for race
participants. The practice sessions will be conducted daily on May 7
and May 8, 2010 from 7 a.m. through 5:30 p.m. Due to the safety hazards
inherent with such events, a safety zone is necessary to help ensure
the safety of the practice session participants as well as the maritime
public.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone created by this rule encompasses all waters bounded
by two lines drawn from shore to shore on the Columbia River, and is
approximately 2 miles in length beginning at the Pioneer Memorial
Bridge at the point where U.S. Route 395 crosses the Columbia River;
the first line running between position 46[deg]14'07'' N,
119[deg]10'42'' W and position 46[deg]13'42'' N, 119[deg]10'51'' W and
the second line running between position 46[deg]13'35'' N,
119[deg]07'34'' W and position 46[deg]13'10'' N, 119[deg]07'47'' W.
The safety zone will be in effect daily from 7 a.m. until 5:30 p.m.
on May 7, 2010 and May 8, 2010. All persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this regulation will restrict
access to the area, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because: The safety zone will only be in effect for a limited time and
maritime traffic will be able to transit the safety zone at designated
intervals throughout that time period and as otherwise authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities some of which may
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in the area covered by the safety zone. The rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, however, because the safety zone will only be in effect for a
limited time and maritime traffic will be able to transit the safety
zone at designated intervals throughout that time period and as
otherwise authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or
[[Page 24801]]
more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-139 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-139 Safety Zone; Tri-City Water Follies Hydroplane Races
Practice Sessions, Columbia River, Kennewick, WA
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
encompassed within the area approximately two miles in length bounded
by two lines drawn from shore to shore on the Columbia River; the first
line running between position 46[deg] 14'07'' N, 119[deg]10'42'' W and
position 46[deg]13'42'' N, 119[deg]10'51'' W and the second line
running between position 46[deg]13'35'' N, 119[deg]07'34'' W and
position 46[deg]13'10'' N, 119[deg]07'47'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone detailed in paragraph (a) of this section or bring, cause to be
brought, or allow to remain in the safety zone detailed in paragraph
(a) of this section any vehicle, vessel, or object unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. See 33 CFR
Part 165, Subpart C, for additional information and requirements.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety zone detailed in paragraph (a)
of this section will be in effect daily from 7 a.m. through 5:30 p.m.
on May 7, 2010 and May 8, 2010.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010-10613 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P