Safety Zone; St. Louis River, Tallas Island, Duluth, MN, 24402-24404 [2010-10498]
Download as PDF
24402
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
■
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.337 as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 117.337
Trout River.
The draw of the CSX Railroad Bridge
across the Trout River, mile 0.9 at
Jacksonville, operates as follows:
(a) The bridge is not tended.
(b) The draw is normally in the fully
open position, displaying green lights to
indicate that vessels may pass.
(c) As a train approaches, provided
the scanners do not detect a vessel
under the draw, the lights change to
flashing red and a horn continuously
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 May 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
sounds while the draw closes. The draw
remains closed until the train passes.
(d) After the train clears the bridge,
the lights continue to flash red and the
horn again continuously sounds while
the draw opens, until the draw is fully
open and the lights return to green.
Chief of Port Operations, MSU Duluth,
Coast Guard; telephone (218) 720–5286
Ext. 111, e-mail aaron.l.gross@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
Dated: April 21, 2010.
R.S. Branham,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2010–10497 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0124]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; St. Louis River, Tallas
Island, Duluth, MN
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
around the Tallas Island area of the St.
Louis River, Duluth, Minnesota. All
vessels are prohibited from transiting
the zone unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port or a
designated representative. This
temporary safety zone is necessary in
order to ensure the safety of the general
public from hazards associated with the
dredging project.
DATES: Effective Date: this rule is
effective in the CFR from May 5, 2010
until 11:59 p.m. November 30, 2010.
This rule is effective with actual notice
for purposes of enforcement beginning
12:01 a.m. May 1, 2010 through 11:59
p.m. November 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0124 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0124 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail LT Aaron Gross,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
publishing of an NPRM would be
impracticable and contrary to public
interest as immediate action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
and property on navigable waters. The
Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice
to mariners to advise vessel operators of
navigational restrictions. On-scene
Coast Guard and local law enforcement
vessels will also provide actual notice to
mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to public interest
because the hazards associated with
dredging projects could lead to severe
injury, fatalities, and/or destruction of
public property. Therefore, immediate
action is needed to ensure the public’s
safety.
Basis and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
general public from the potential threat
associated with the dredging project
beginning at Tallas Island, St. Louis
River. The Captain of the Port Duluth
has determined this activity could pose
significant risk to public safety and
property. Establishing a safety zone to
control vessel movement around the
location of the work site will help
prevent damage and injury to workers
on the site, any recreational vessels, the
public and help minimize the associated
risks.
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion of Rule
The following area will be a
temporary safety zone: Near Tallas
Island on the St. Louis River to include
all waters contained within the zone
located at 46°42.30 N 092°11.56 W and
then run northeast to position; 46°42.53
N 092°11.30 W and then run northwest
to position; 46°43.5 N 092°11.41 W and
then run southwest to position; 46°42.37
N 092°12.11 W and then running
southeast back to the starting point
(NAD 83). The safety zone’s boundary is
approximately 3500 ft. by 1500 ft. on the
long end, extending behind Tallas
Island, and 3000 ft by 1500 ft on the
short end, extending into open waters.
The safety zone will be effective from
May 1, 2010 through November 30,
2010.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone will be prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this regulation will restrict
access to the area, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The
safety zone is a limited size; (ii) vessels
may be granted permission to transit the
area by the Captain of the Port or a
designated representative .
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 May 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
24403
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: Owners or operators of vessels
operating in the St. Louis River
intending to transit through or anchor in
the waters near Tallas Island during the
effective period of the safety zone. This
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on the owners or
operators of affected vessels because the
rule is temporary in nature, lasting for
only a few months. Also, it affects a
relatively small area of water along the
St. Louis River. Therefore, vessels can
easily transit around the zone. In
addition, the safety zone will not limit
any residential or public access areas.
Finally, small entities needing entry
into the temporary safety zone might
gain access via communications with
the Captain of the Port or designated
representative.
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
24404
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone established to protect the public
from the dangers associated with
dredging operations and therefore, is
categorically excluded.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 May 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 165–REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T09–0124 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0124 Safety Zone; St. Louis
River, Tallas Island, Duluth, MN
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: near Tallas
Island on the St. Louis River to include
all waters contained within the zone
located at 46°42.30 N 092°11.56 W and
then run northeast to position; 46°42.53
N 092°11.30 W and then run northwest
to position; 46°43.5 N 092°11.41 W and
then run southwest to position; 46°42.37
N 092°12.11 W and then running
southeast back to the starting point
(NAD 83). The safety zone’s boundary is
approximately 3500 ft. by 1500 ft. on the
long end, extending behind Tallas
Island, and 3000 ft by 1500 ft on the
short end, extending into open waters.
(b) Effective Dates. This rule is
effective from 12:01 a.m. May 1, 2010
until 11:59 p.m. November 30, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Duluth,
or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Duluth
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
permitted to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with the
instructions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Duluth or his onscene representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: April 5, 2010.
M.P. Lebsack,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2010–10498 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0513; FRL–9136–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Volatile Organic Compound
Automobile Refinishing Rules for
Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving into the
Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP)
amendments to Indiana’s automobile
refinishing rule. These rule revisions
extend the applicability of Indiana’s
approved volatile organic compound
(VOC) automobile refinishing rules to
all persons in Indiana who sell or
manufacture automobile refinishing
coatings or who refinish motor vehicles.
The rules are approvable because they
are consistent with the Clean Air Act
(Act) and EPA regulations, and should
result in additional VOC emission
reductions throughout Indiana. EPA
proposed these rules for approval on
January 14, 2010, and received one
favorable comment.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Nos. EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0513. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24402-24404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0124]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; St. Louis River, Tallas Island, Duluth, MN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone around
the Tallas Island area of the St. Louis River, Duluth, Minnesota. All
vessels are prohibited from transiting the zone unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port or a designated representative.
This temporary safety zone is necessary in order to ensure the safety
of the general public from hazards associated with the dredging
project.
DATES: Effective Date: this rule is effective in the CFR from May 5,
2010 until 11:59 p.m. November 30, 2010. This rule is effective with
actual notice for purposes of enforcement beginning 12:01 a.m. May 1,
2010 through 11:59 p.m. November 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0124 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0124 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail LT Aaron Gross, Chief of Port
Operations, MSU Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone (218) 720-5286 Ext. 111,
e-mail aaron.l.gross@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the publishing of an NPRM would be
impracticable and contrary to public interest as immediate action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life and property on navigable
waters. The Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice to mariners to
advise vessel operators of navigational restrictions. On-scene Coast
Guard and local law enforcement vessels will also provide actual notice
to mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to public interest because the hazards associated with
dredging projects could lead to severe injury, fatalities, and/or
destruction of public property. Therefore, immediate action is needed
to ensure the public's safety.
Basis and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the
general public from the potential threat associated with the dredging
project beginning at Tallas Island, St. Louis River. The Captain of the
Port Duluth has determined this activity could pose significant risk to
public safety and property. Establishing a safety zone to control
vessel movement around the location of the work site will help prevent
damage and injury to workers on the site, any recreational vessels, the
public and help minimize the associated risks.
[[Page 24403]]
Discussion of Rule
The following area will be a temporary safety zone: Near Tallas
Island on the St. Louis River to include all waters contained within
the zone located at 46[deg]42.30 N 092[deg]11.56 W and then run
northeast to position; 46[deg]42.53 N 092[deg]11.30 W and then run
northwest to position; 46[deg]43.5 N 092[deg]11.41 W and then run
southwest to position; 46[deg]42.37 N 092[deg]12.11 W and then running
southeast back to the starting point (NAD 83). The safety zone's
boundary is approximately 3500 ft. by 1500 ft. on the long end,
extending behind Tallas Island, and 3000 ft by 1500 ft on the short
end, extending into open waters. The safety zone will be effective from
May 1, 2010 through November 30, 2010.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone will be prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this regulation will restrict access to the area, the
effect of this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety
zone is a limited size; (ii) vessels may be granted permission to
transit the area by the Captain of the Port or a designated
representative .
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: Owners or operators of vessels operating in the
St. Louis River intending to transit through or anchor in the waters
near Tallas Island during the effective period of the safety zone. This
rule will not have a significant economic impact on the owners or
operators of affected vessels because the rule is temporary in nature,
lasting for only a few months. Also, it affects a relatively small area
of water along the St. Louis River. Therefore, vessels can easily
transit around the zone. In addition, the safety zone will not limit
any residential or public access areas. Finally, small entities needing
entry into the temporary safety zone might gain access via
communications with the Captain of the Port or designated
representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not
[[Page 24404]]
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone
established to protect the public from the dangers associated with
dredging operations and therefore, is categorically excluded.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165-REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0124 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0124 Safety Zone; St. Louis River, Tallas Island,
Duluth, MN
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: near
Tallas Island on the St. Louis River to include all waters contained
within the zone located at 46[deg]42.30 N 092[deg]11.56 W and then run
northeast to position; 46[deg]42.53 N 092[deg]11.30 W and then run
northwest to position; 46[deg]43.5 N 092[deg]11.41 W and then run
southwest to position; 46[deg]42.37 N 092[deg]12.11 W and then running
southeast back to the starting point (NAD 83). The safety zone's
boundary is approximately 3500 ft. by 1500 ft. on the long end,
extending behind Tallas Island, and 3000 ft by 1500 ft on the short
end, extending into open waters.
(b) Effective Dates. This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m. May 1,
2010 until 11:59 p.m. November 30, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Duluth, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators
permitted to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with the
instructions given to them by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-
scene representative.
Dated: April 5, 2010.
M.P. Lebsack,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2010-10498 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P