Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office, Phoenix, AZ, and Huhugam Heritage Center, Gila River Indian Community, AZ, 23802-23803 [2010-10378]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23802
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 4, 2010 / Notices
Dated: April 12, 2010.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2010–10368 Filed 5–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural
Items: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area
Office, Phoenix, AZ, and Huhugam
Heritage Center, Gila River Indian
Community, AZ
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
to repatriate cultural items in the
control of the U.S. Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Reclamation,
Phoenix Area Office, Phoenix, AZ, and
in the physical custody of the Huhugam
Heritage Center, Gila River Indian
Community, AZ, that meet the
definition of ‘‘unassociated funerary
objects’’ under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American cultural items. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
Human remains and associated
funerary objects from the sites described
below were originally reported in a
Notice of Inventory Completion
published in the Federal Register (39
FR 8996–9002, February 27, 2002); and
subsequently corrected with two
additional Notices of Inventory
Completion (67 FR 45539–45540, July 9,
2002; 67 FR 78247–78248, December 23,
2002). The materials reported in the
earlier notices were repatriated to the
affiliated tribes in October and
November of 2002. A recent review of
Bureau of Reclamation collections, now
curated at the Huhugam Heritage
Center, Gila River Indian Community,
revealed the presence of additional
possible isolated Native American
human remains and 40 additional
funerary objects, all culturally affiliated
with the same tribes listed in the
original notice. Although these possible
isolated human remains were identified,
they do not increase the number of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:58 May 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
individuals listed in the previously
published notices. Since the human
remains in the previous notices were
repatriated, the funerary objects are now
considered to be unassociated funerary
objects.
Between 1980 and 1981, during
legally authorized data recovery efforts
undertaken by the Arizona State
Museum for the Bureau of Reclamation,
human remains representing 20
individuals were recovered from the
Siphon Draw site, AZ U: 10:6(ASM),
south of Apache Junction, Pinal County,
AZ. No known individuals were
identified. Previously a total of 141
associated funerary objects were
reported as also being recovered. In
October 2002, these materials were
repatriated to the Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. An additional
four funerary objects were recently
identified in the Siphon Draw (AZ
U:10:6(ASM)) collections. The four
unassociated funerary objects are two
unworked whole shells (terrestrial
snails), one flotation, and one pollen
sample.
On the basis of archeological context,
chronometric, architectural, ceramic,
and other types of artifactual evidence,
the site represents a Hohokam
occupation of the Santa Cruz through
Sacaton Phases (A.D. 700–1150) of the
Preclassic period.
Between 1980 and 1981, during
legally authorized data recovery efforts
undertaken by the Arizona State
Museum for the Bureau of Reclamation,
human remains representing 31
individuals were recovered from the Las
Fosas site, AZ U:15:19(ASM), in the Gila
Valley east of Florence, Pinal County,
AZ. No known individuals were
identified. Previously a total of 290
associated funerary objects were
reported as also being recovered. In
October 2002, these materials were
repatriated to the Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. An additional 24
funerary objects were recently identified
in the Las Fosas, AZ U:15:19(ASM),
collections. The 24 unassociated
funerary objects are 1 reconstructable
ceramic bowl, 2 individual ceramic
sherds, 2 bags ceramic sherds, 1 bag
chipped stone, 2 unworked obsidian
nodules, 1 bag of unworked faunal bone
(including a near-complete macaw), 1
soil sample with possible cremains, 13
unprocessed soil samples, and 1
unprocessed flotation sample.
On the basis of archeological context,
chronometric, architectural, ceramic,
and other types of artifactual evidence,
the site represents a Hohokam
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
occupation of the Classic period (A.D.
1150–1450).
Between 1980 and 1981, during
legally authorized data recovery efforts
undertaken by the Arizona State
Museum for the Bureau of Reclamation,
human remains representing a
minimum of 31 individuals were
recovered from Frogtown, AZ
U:15:61(ASM), west of Florence
Junction, Pinal County, AZ. No known
individuals were identified. Previously
a total of 120 associated funerary objects
were also reported as being recovered.
In October 2002, these materials were
repatriated to the Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. An additional 10
funerary objects were recently identified
in the Frogtown (AZ U:15:61(ASM))
collection, as well as possible human
remains of a previously repatriated
individual. The 10 unassociated
funerary objects are 1 stone palette
fragment, 3 pieces of worked shell, 1
piece unworked shell, 3 bags of
unworked faunal bone mixed with
possible human remains, 1 unprocessed
flotation sample with possible human
remains, and 1 unprocessed flotation
sample.
On the basis of archeological context,
chronometric, architectural, ceramic,
and other types of artifactual evidence,
the site represents a Hohokam
occupation of the Santa Cruz and
Sacaton Phases (A.D. 750–1150) of the
Preclassic period.
Between 1980 and 1981, during
legally authorized data recovery efforts
undertaken by the Arizona State
Museum for the Bureau of Reclamation,
human remains representing a
minimum of six individuals were
recovered from site AZ U:15:85(ASM),
in Pinal County, AZ. No known
individuals were identified. Previously
a total of 10 associated funerary objects
were also reported as being recovered.
In October 2002, these materials were
repatriated to the Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. The two funerary
objects recently identified in the AZ
U:15:85(ASM) collections are two bags
of ceramic sherds.
On the basis of archeological context,
chronometric, architectural, ceramic,
and other types of artifactual evidence,
the site represents a Hohokam
occupation of the Classic period (A.D.
1150–1450).
Evidence provided by
anthropological, archeological,
biological, geographical, historical,
kinship, linguistics, and oral tradition
sources was considered in determining
the cultural affiliation of the funerary
objects. Bureau of Reclamation officials
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 4, 2010 / Notices
have determined that the preponderance
of the evidence suggests that the historic
O’odham groups (Ak-Chin Indian
Community of the Ak-Chin Indian
Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona; Salt River PimaMaricopa Indian Community of the Salt
River Reservation, Arizona; and the
Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona,
including the San Xavier District) have
a strong cultural affiliation with the
prehistoric Hohokam who occupied the
middle Gila Valley and surrounding
areas. Great similarities in settlement
patterns, economic systems,
architecture, and material culture point
to a close relationship between the
Hohokam and the O’odham groups. The
O’odham were well established along
the rivers and in the deserts when the
Spanish first arrived in northern Sonora
and southern Arizona.
One of the two Pima moieties claims
descend from the Hohokam, while the
other moiety is said to have descended
from the ‘‘emergers,’’ those who
overthrew the Hohokam leaders.
Although the O’odham belong to the
same linguistic group (Piman) as
communities in what is now northern
Mexico, shared vocabulary and syntax
with Yuman language groups along the
Colorado River suggests a long-term
history of interaction that stretches back
into prehistoric times in what is now
southern Arizona.
Evidence also shows the affiliation of
ancestral Zuni and Hopi groups with the
prehistoric Hohokam. Interaction is
indicated by the presence of trade items,
particularly ceramics. Such interaction
continued into protohistoric and early
historic times. In addition to trade, Hopi
and Zuni migration traditions indicate
that clans originating from areas south
of the Colorado Plateau joined the
plateau communities late in prehistoric
times. These groups contributed
ceremonies, societies, and iconography
to the plateau groups. Both O’odham
and Western Pueblo oral traditions
indicate that some Hohokam groups
may have left the Salt-Gila River Basin
after disastrous floods and social
upheaval. These groups traveled north
and east, possibly to be assimilated by
the Hopi and Zuni. These ties are
reflected in some of the traditional
ceremonies maintained as part of the
annual ceremonial cycle. Therefore, the
evidence suggests that the Hopi and
Zuni are also culturally affiliated with
the Hohokam. Their ancestors had trade
relationships and other likely
interactions with the Hohokam, similar
to those found between groups in the
early historic period. Hopi and Zuni
oral traditions indicate that segments of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:58 May 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
the prehistoric Hohokam population
migrated to the areas occupied by the
Hopi and Zuni and were assimilated
into the resident populations.
Officials of the Bureau of Reclamation
have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the 40 items
described above are reasonably believed
to have been placed with or near
individual human remains at the time of
death or later as part of the death rite
or ceremony and are believed to have
been removed from a specific burial site
of Native American individuals.
Officials of the Bureau of Reclamation
also have determined that, pursuant to
25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship
of shared group identity that can be
reasonably traced between the
unassociated funerary objects and the
Ak-Chin Indian Community of the
Maricopa (Ak-Chin) Indian Reservation,
Arizona; Gila River Indian Community
of the Gila River Indian Reservation,
Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt
River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community of the Salt River
Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O’odham
Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the
Zuni Reservation, New Mexico.
Representative of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the unassociated funerary
objects should contact in writing Carol
Erwin, Area Manager, Bureau of
Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office, 6150
West Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ
85306–4001, before June 3, 2010.
Repatriation of the unassociated
funerary objects to the Ak-Chin Indian
Community of the Maricopa (Ak-Chin)
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River
Indian Community of the Gila River
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe
of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community of the Salt River
Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O’odham
Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the
Zuni Reservation, New Mexico, may
proceed after that date if no additional
claimants come forward.
The Bureau of Reclamation is
responsible for notifying the Ak-Chin
Indian Community of the Maricopa (AkChin) Indian Reservation, Arizona;
Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the
Chemehuevi Indian Reservation,
California; Cocopah Tribe of Arizona;
Colorado River Indian Tribes of the
Colorado River Indian Reservation,
Arizona and California; Fort McDowell
Yavapai Nation, Arizona; Fort Mohave
Indian Tribe of Arizona, California, and
Nevada; Gila River Indian Community
of the Gila River Indian Reservation,
Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Pascua
Yaqui Tribe of Arizona; Quechan Tribe
of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation,
California and Arizona; Salt River Pima-
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23803
Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt
River Reservation, Arizona; San Carlos
Apache Tribe of the San Carlos
Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O’odham
Nation of Arizona; Tonto Apache Tribe
of Arizona; White Mountain Apache
Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation,
Arizona; Yavapai-Apache Nation of the
Camp Verde Indian Reservation,
Arizona; Yavapai-Prescott Tribe of the
Yavapai Reservation, Arizona; and Zuni
Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New
Mexico, that this notice has been
published.
Dated: April 6, 2010.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2010–10378 Filed 5–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion:
Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the possession and control of
the Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI. The
human remains were removed from
Brooks Island, Contra Costa County, CA.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by Bishop Museum
professional staff in consultation with
representatives of the the Santa Rosa
Indian Community of the Santa Rosa
Rancheria, California (Tachi Yokut
Tribe).
On February 8, 1958, human remains
representing a minimum of one
individual were removed from Brooks
Island, in San Pablo Bay, Contra Costa
County, CA, most likely by A.C. Ziegler.
The circumstances of the removal from
Brooks Island are not known, but the
remains were included in Dr. Ziegler’s
personal collections donated to the
Bishop Museum after his death. The
remains were housed in a box labeled
‘‘Homo Sapiens (infant)/sex?/Brooks
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23802-23803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10378]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: U.S. Department of
the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office, Phoenix, AZ,
and Huhugam Heritage Center, Gila River Indian Community, AZ
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
to repatriate cultural items in the control of the U.S. Department of
the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office, Phoenix, AZ,
and in the physical custody of the Huhugam Heritage Center, Gila River
Indian Community, AZ, that meet the definition of ``unassociated
funerary objects'' under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The
determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native
American cultural items. The National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
Human remains and associated funerary objects from the sites
described below were originally reported in a Notice of Inventory
Completion published in the Federal Register (39 FR 8996-9002, February
27, 2002); and subsequently corrected with two additional Notices of
Inventory Completion (67 FR 45539-45540, July 9, 2002; 67 FR 78247-
78248, December 23, 2002). The materials reported in the earlier
notices were repatriated to the affiliated tribes in October and
November of 2002. A recent review of Bureau of Reclamation collections,
now curated at the Huhugam Heritage Center, Gila River Indian
Community, revealed the presence of additional possible isolated Native
American human remains and 40 additional funerary objects, all
culturally affiliated with the same tribes listed in the original
notice. Although these possible isolated human remains were identified,
they do not increase the number of individuals listed in the previously
published notices. Since the human remains in the previous notices were
repatriated, the funerary objects are now considered to be unassociated
funerary objects.
Between 1980 and 1981, during legally authorized data recovery
efforts undertaken by the Arizona State Museum for the Bureau of
Reclamation, human remains representing 20 individuals were recovered
from the Siphon Draw site, AZ U: 10:6(ASM), south of Apache Junction,
Pinal County, AZ. No known individuals were identified. Previously a
total of 141 associated funerary objects were reported as also being
recovered. In October 2002, these materials were repatriated to the
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation,
Arizona. An additional four funerary objects were recently identified
in the Siphon Draw (AZ U:10:6(ASM)) collections. The four unassociated
funerary objects are two unworked whole shells (terrestrial snails),
one flotation, and one pollen sample.
On the basis of archeological context, chronometric, architectural,
ceramic, and other types of artifactual evidence, the site represents a
Hohokam occupation of the Santa Cruz through Sacaton Phases (A.D. 700-
1150) of the Preclassic period.
Between 1980 and 1981, during legally authorized data recovery
efforts undertaken by the Arizona State Museum for the Bureau of
Reclamation, human remains representing 31 individuals were recovered
from the Las Fosas site, AZ U:15:19(ASM), in the Gila Valley east of
Florence, Pinal County, AZ. No known individuals were identified.
Previously a total of 290 associated funerary objects were reported as
also being recovered. In October 2002, these materials were repatriated
to the Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. An additional 24 funerary objects were recently
identified in the Las Fosas, AZ U:15:19(ASM), collections. The 24
unassociated funerary objects are 1 reconstructable ceramic bowl, 2
individual ceramic sherds, 2 bags ceramic sherds, 1 bag chipped stone,
2 unworked obsidian nodules, 1 bag of unworked faunal bone (including a
near-complete macaw), 1 soil sample with possible cremains, 13
unprocessed soil samples, and 1 unprocessed flotation sample.
On the basis of archeological context, chronometric, architectural,
ceramic, and other types of artifactual evidence, the site represents a
Hohokam occupation of the Classic period (A.D. 1150-1450).
Between 1980 and 1981, during legally authorized data recovery
efforts undertaken by the Arizona State Museum for the Bureau of
Reclamation, human remains representing a minimum of 31 individuals
were recovered from Frogtown, AZ U:15:61(ASM), west of Florence
Junction, Pinal County, AZ. No known individuals were identified.
Previously a total of 120 associated funerary objects were also
reported as being recovered. In October 2002, these materials were
repatriated to the Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian
Reservation, Arizona. An additional 10 funerary objects were recently
identified in the Frogtown (AZ U:15:61(ASM)) collection, as well as
possible human remains of a previously repatriated individual. The 10
unassociated funerary objects are 1 stone palette fragment, 3 pieces of
worked shell, 1 piece unworked shell, 3 bags of unworked faunal bone
mixed with possible human remains, 1 unprocessed flotation sample with
possible human remains, and 1 unprocessed flotation sample.
On the basis of archeological context, chronometric, architectural,
ceramic, and other types of artifactual evidence, the site represents a
Hohokam occupation of the Santa Cruz and Sacaton Phases (A.D. 750-1150)
of the Preclassic period.
Between 1980 and 1981, during legally authorized data recovery
efforts undertaken by the Arizona State Museum for the Bureau of
Reclamation, human remains representing a minimum of six individuals
were recovered from site AZ U:15:85(ASM), in Pinal County, AZ. No known
individuals were identified. Previously a total of 10 associated
funerary objects were also reported as being recovered. In October
2002, these materials were repatriated to the Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona. The two
funerary objects recently identified in the AZ U:15:85(ASM) collections
are two bags of ceramic sherds.
On the basis of archeological context, chronometric, architectural,
ceramic, and other types of artifactual evidence, the site represents a
Hohokam occupation of the Classic period (A.D. 1150-1450).
Evidence provided by anthropological, archeological, biological,
geographical, historical, kinship, linguistics, and oral tradition
sources was considered in determining the cultural affiliation of the
funerary objects. Bureau of Reclamation officials
[[Page 23803]]
have determined that the preponderance of the evidence suggests that
the historic O'odham groups (Ak-Chin Indian Community of the Ak-Chin
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila
River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; and the Tohono
O'odham Nation of Arizona, including the San Xavier District) have a
strong cultural affiliation with the prehistoric Hohokam who occupied
the middle Gila Valley and surrounding areas. Great similarities in
settlement patterns, economic systems, architecture, and material
culture point to a close relationship between the Hohokam and the
O'odham groups. The O'odham were well established along the rivers and
in the deserts when the Spanish first arrived in northern Sonora and
southern Arizona.
One of the two Pima moieties claims descend from the Hohokam, while
the other moiety is said to have descended from the ``emergers,'' those
who overthrew the Hohokam leaders. Although the O'odham belong to the
same linguistic group (Piman) as communities in what is now northern
Mexico, shared vocabulary and syntax with Yuman language groups along
the Colorado River suggests a long-term history of interaction that
stretches back into prehistoric times in what is now southern Arizona.
Evidence also shows the affiliation of ancestral Zuni and Hopi
groups with the prehistoric Hohokam. Interaction is indicated by the
presence of trade items, particularly ceramics. Such interaction
continued into protohistoric and early historic times. In addition to
trade, Hopi and Zuni migration traditions indicate that clans
originating from areas south of the Colorado Plateau joined the plateau
communities late in prehistoric times. These groups contributed
ceremonies, societies, and iconography to the plateau groups. Both
O'odham and Western Pueblo oral traditions indicate that some Hohokam
groups may have left the Salt-Gila River Basin after disastrous floods
and social upheaval. These groups traveled north and east, possibly to
be assimilated by the Hopi and Zuni. These ties are reflected in some
of the traditional ceremonies maintained as part of the annual
ceremonial cycle. Therefore, the evidence suggests that the Hopi and
Zuni are also culturally affiliated with the Hohokam. Their ancestors
had trade relationships and other likely interactions with the Hohokam,
similar to those found between groups in the early historic period.
Hopi and Zuni oral traditions indicate that segments of the prehistoric
Hohokam population migrated to the areas occupied by the Hopi and Zuni
and were assimilated into the resident populations.
Officials of the Bureau of Reclamation have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the 40 items described above are
reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human
remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or
ceremony and are believed to have been removed from a specific burial
site of Native American individuals. Officials of the Bureau of
Reclamation also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2),
there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably
traced between the unassociated funerary objects and the Ak-Chin Indian
Community of the Maricopa (Ak-Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila
River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona;
Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the
Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and
Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico.
Representative of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be
culturally affiliated with the unassociated funerary objects should
contact in writing Carol Erwin, Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation,
Phoenix Area Office, 6150 West Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ 85306-
4001, before June 3, 2010. Repatriation of the unassociated funerary
objects to the Ak-Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak-Chin)
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila
River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona;
Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni
Reservation, New Mexico, may proceed after that date if no additional
claimants come forward.
The Bureau of Reclamation is responsible for notifying the Ak-Chin
Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak-Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona;
Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Indian Reservation,
California; Cocopah Tribe of Arizona; Colorado River Indian Tribes of
the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California; Fort
McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona; Fort Mohave Indian Tribe of Arizona,
California, and Nevada; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River
Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Pascua Yaqui Tribe
of Arizona; Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation,
California and Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of
the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San
Carlos Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; Tonto
Apache Tribe of Arizona; White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache
Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian
Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai-Prescott Tribe of the Yavapai
Reservation, Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New
Mexico, that this notice has been published.
Dated: April 6, 2010.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2010-10378 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-S
