Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 23266-23269 [2010-10197]
Download as PDF
23266
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices
actual interview; and Estimated Total
Annual Burden Hours Requested:
83.64.The annualized cost to
respondents is estimated at: $1505.52
(based on $18 per hour). There are no
Capital Costs to report. There are no
Operating or Maintenance Costs to
report.
Table 1: Estimate of Requested Burden
Hours and Dollar Value of Burden
Hours
TABLE A.12–1 ESTIMATES OF HOUR BURDEN
Estimated number of responses
per respondent
No. of respondents
Type of respondents
Average burden
hours per response
Estimated total
annual burden
hours requested
32.6
30
15
6
Donors initially contacted ...............................................................
PDI Donors ....................................................................................
Deferred Donors ............................................................................
Accepted Donors ...........................................................................
408
*60
*30
*12
1
1
1
1
.08
0.5
0.5
0.5
Total ........................................................................................
408
............................
............................
83.64
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
*These respondents are a subgroup of total 408 donors who will be initially contacted to participate in the study.
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies are invited
on one or more of the following points:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the function of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the: Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Regulatory Affairs,
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974, Attention: Desk
Officer for NIH. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and instruments, contact Dr.
George Nemo, Project Officer, NHLBI,
Two Rockledge Center, Suite 361, 6700
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
or call non-toll-free number 301–435–
0075, or e-mail your request, including
your address to nemog@nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Apr 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: April 26, 2010.
George Nemo,
Project Officer, NHLBI, National Institutes of
Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–10283 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project:
‘‘Standardizing Antibiotic Use in LongTerm Care Settings SAUL) Study.’’ In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520,
AHRQ invites the public to comment on
this proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by July 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Standardizing Antibiotic Use in LongTerm Care Settings (SAUL)
Study Inappropriate antibiotic
prescribing practices by primary care
clinicians caring for residents in longterm care (LTC) communities is
becoming a major public health concern
as it is a risk factor for morbidity and
mortality among LTC residents.
Antibiotics are among the most
commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals
in LTC settings, yet reports indicate that
a high proportion of antibiotic
prescriptions are inappropriate. The
adverse consequences of inappropriate
prescribing practices are serious and
include drug reactions/interactions,
secondary complications, and the
emergence of multi-drug resistant
organisms.
In an effort to reduce antibiotic
overprescribing, Loeb and colleagues
developed minimum criteria for the
initiation of antibiotics in LTC setting
(Loeb, M., et al. 2001). The criteria have
been tested in several studies, but their
implementation and tests of validity
have been limited. In particular, though
Loeb and colleagues developed distinct
minimum criteria for several types of
infection (skin and soft-tissue,
respiratory, urinary tract, and
unexplained fever), a rigorous
evaluation has been conducted only for
urinary tract infections.
Twelve nursing homes (NH) will
participate in this project; six NHs will
be recruited to serve as treatment sites
and six to serve as control sites. Once
a nursing home community has been
selected and randomly assigned to the
treatment or control group, a facility
recruitment letter will be sent to the
facility Administrator. The letter will
include a description of the study and
inform the Administrator that the
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
project manager will be calling in the
near future to further discuss the project
and answers any questions that he/she
might have regarding the program.
The objectives of the study are to:
1. Implement a quality improvement
(QI) intervention program to optimize
antibiotic prescribing practices;
2. Evaluate the effect of the QI
intervention on antibiotic prescribing
practices including validation of the
Loeb minimum criteria; and
3. Develop and execute a
dissemination plan to ensure wide
dissemination of the findings and
recommendations for improving
antibiotic prescribing behaviors in LTC
settings.
To address the first study objective,
the research team will conduct a sixmonth QI intervention program in the
six treatment sites to improve antibiotic
prescribing practices. The intervention
incorporates investigative evidence
including the Loeb algorithms. QI
program procedures are documented in
the draft intervention manual, including
the Loeb algorithms. The protocol
recognizes that not all factors will need
attention in all instances, as (for
example) some NHs may already be
vigilant to advance directive
completion. The QI program is intended
for facilities to self-implement and
monitor with guidance provided from
the research team upon request.
In order to validate the Loeb Criteria
and to test the efficacy of the QI
intervention, recruited facilities will be
matched in pairs with respect to
bedsize, profit status and location
(urban, suburban, rural) and within each
pair, one facility will be randomized to
each study arm (treatment and control).
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractors, Abt
Associates and the University of North
Carolina, pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory
authority to conduct and support
research on healthcare and on systems
for the delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality,
effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare
services and with respect to quality
measurement and improvement. 42
U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
Method of Collection
The following data collection
activities and trainings will be
implemented to achieve the first two
objectives of this project:
(1) Pre-implementation semistructured interviews will be conducted
separately with physicians, facility
administrators and with the director of
nursing (DON) or nurse educators (see
Attachment D for each type of pre-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Apr 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
implementation interview) from the six
treatment sites. The purpose of these
interviews is to generate ideas on how
best to implement the new procedures
and what approaches work best across
facilities. Related risk factors and
remedial strategies also will be
identified. These interviews will take
place during the three month baseline
period and feedback will be used to
modify the intervention materials as
appropriate.
(2) Administrator interviews will be
conducted at the time of facility
enrollment to collect facility-level data
in order to describe the sample and to
explore linkages to prescribing
practices. General facility-level
descriptors including size (number of
beds), profit status, location (urban,
suburban, rural), and staffing levels
(number of full and part-time registered
nurses, licensed practical nurses, and
nurse aides) will be collected.
Additionally, simple summary (facilitylevel) information regarding resident
demographics will be collected (e.g. age,
gender, race/ethnicity, proportion longstay vs. post-acute/rehab). Facility data
will be collected through interviews
with the Administrator at all twelve
facilities.
(3) Train-the-trainer training will be
conducted during the baseline period
(prior to the implementation of the
intervention). Research staff will present
information about the Antibiotic Use QI
and Monitoring Program at one, twohour in-person meeting held at each
treatment site. The research team will
work with physicians (the physician
champion at each facility; a physician
champion is an expert that provides
education, champions a cause or
product, or gives support to staff around
the diffusion and implementation of
clinical practice guidelines, protocols,
or research evidence), administrators,
directors of nursing and nurse educators
using a train-the-trainer model to offer
guidance on educating intervention site
staff on how to implement the
Antibiotic Use QI Program that is based
on the Loeb criteria. Intervention and
training materials include those
products and strategies used in other
successful projects (e.g., written Loeb
algorithms).
(4) Train-the-nurses training will be
conducted by the nurse educator at each
of the six treatment sites following the
train-the-trainer training. The nurse
educator will introduce the facility
nurses to the Antibiotic Use Ql and
Monitoring Program materials and train
them on the use of the Loeb minimum
criteria. This training will be offered
two times at regularly scheduled inservice meetings; however each nurse
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23267
will be required to attend only one
session.
(5) Train-the-physicians training will
be conducted by the physician
champion at each of the six treatment
sites following the train-the-trainer
training. The project team will be
present to address any questions
regarding the study. The physician
champion will introduce the facility
physicians to the Antibiotic Use QI and
Monitoring Program materials and
discuss with them the use of the Loeb
minimum criteria. An average of five
physicians at each facility will be
individually contacted by the physician
champion to discuss the use of the Loeb
criteria. Each physician will have
received a letter with the study
description and the Loeb criteria prior
to contact by the physician champion.
(6) Medical record reviews (MMR)
will be conducted by research staff to
collect primary outcome data to
determine antibiotic prescribing.
Primary outcomes will be obtained by
monthly chart review for a period of
nine months: three months preceding
the initiation of the QI intervention (for
which the charts of all residents will be
abstracted), and each month for six
months following the inception of the
program (for which the charts of all
residents will be abstracted, regardless
of whether or not they are discharged
from the setting or die) at all 12 facilities
(treatment and control) by trained
research staff from current (not archival)
records. Since this data collection will
not impose a burden on the facility staff
OMB clearance is not required.
(7) Final semi-structured interviews
with QI team members including
physicians, facility administrators, and
other key facility staff will be conducted
at the completion of the intervention to
determine their perceptions regarding
facilitators and barriers to successful
program implementation.
(8) Nurse survey will be administered
to nurses in all twelve facilities in the
month prior to program
implementation, and again in the final
month of implementation. The purpose
of this survey is to collect secondary
outcome data regarding the antibiotic
prescribing decision-making process
and to collect basic information about
each nurse, such as their title, type of
degree and years worked in a LTC
facility.
(9) Physician survey will be
administered in all twelve facilities in
the month prior to program
implementation, and again in the final
month of implementation. Similar to the
nurse survey, the purpose of this survey
is to collect secondary outcome data
regarding the antibiotic prescribing
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
23268
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices
decision-making process and to collect
basic information about each physician.
In response to the third study
objective, AHRQ will draw upon its
extensive experience of successfully
disseminating information through
varying strategies. To assist in designing
a plan that has ‘‘real world’’ impact,
AHRQ’s Dissemination Planning Tool
will be utilized.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden hours for the
respondents’ time to participate in this
research. Pre-implementation semistructured interviews will be conducted
with 3 staff members from each of the
6 intervention sites and will last about
1 hour. The administrator interviews
will be completed with one
administrator from each of the 12
participating NHs and will require 15
minutes. Train-the-trainer training will
include 4 persons from each of the 6
intervention sites and will last 2 hours.
Train-the-nurses training will be
conducted with 24 nurses from each of
the intervention sites; the number of
responses per NH is 26 since the nurse
trainer is an employee of the NH and
will conduct the training twice, with
about 12 nurses in each training. The
nurse training will last about 1 hour.
Train-the-physician training will be
conducted with 5 physicians from each
of the 6 intervention sites; the number
of responses per NH is 6 since the
physician trainer is affiliated with the
NH. The physician training will last
about 30 minutes.
Final semi-structured interviews will
include 4 QI team members from each
of the 6 intervention sites, at the
completion of the intervention, and will
last one hour. The nurse survey will be
administered twice to 24 nurses from
each of the 12 participating NHs and
will take about 15 minutes to complete.
The physician survey will be
administered twice to 5 physicians from
each of the 12 facilities and requires 15
minutes to complete. The total
annualized burden hours are estimated
to be 441 hours.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annual
cost burden to the respondent, based on
their time to participate in this research.
The annual cost burden is estimated to
be $25,204.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
nursing homes
Form name
Number of responses per
nursing home
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
Pre-implementation semi-structured interviews ...............................
Administrator Interviews ..................................................................
Train-the-trainer training ..................................................................
Train-the-nurses training ..................................................................
Train-the-physicians training ............................................................
Final Semi-Structured Interview ......................................................
Nurse survey ....................................................................................
Physician survey ..............................................................................
6
12
6
6
6
6
12
12
3
1
4
26
6
4
48
10
1
15/60
2
1
30/60
1
15/60
15/60
18
3
48
156
18
24
144
30
Total ..........................................................................................
66
n/a
n/a
441
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
nursing homes
Form name
Total burden
hours
Average hourly
wage rate *
Total cost burden
Pre-implementation semi-structured interviews ...............................
Administrator Interviews ..................................................................
Train-the-trainer training ..................................................................
Train-the-nurses training ..................................................................
Train-the-physicians training ............................................................
Final Semi-Structured Interview ......................................................
Nurse survey ....................................................................................
Physician survey ..............................................................................
6
12
6
6
6
6
12
12
18
3
48
156
18
24
144
30
** 51.68
*** 46.59
31.31
77.64
31.31
77.64
*** 46.59
46.10
$930
140
1,503
12,112
564
1,863
6,709
1,383
Total ..........................................................................................
66
441
n/a
25,204
* Based upon the mean of the average wages, National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. May 2008.
** Average wages for one registered nurse ($31.31), one physician ($77.64), and one Administrator ($46.10);
*** Average wages for two registered nurse ($31.31), one physician ($77.64), and one Administrator ($46.10).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal
Government
Exhibit 3 shows the total and
annualized cost for conducting this
research. The total budget for this three
year study is $999,976. The
administration task includes costs
associated with the initial kick-off
conference call with AHRQ and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Apr 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
monthly progress reports and ongoing
conference calls. The research plan task
includes costs to finalize the research
plan; conduct the literature search;
prepare and submit the IRB applications
and OMB package; recruit facilities;
collect baseline and monthly data from
medical record reviews and conduct
pre- and post-intervention provider
interviews; implement the intervention;
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and write the final report on the
explanatory model. The dissemination
costs include the writing of a
dissemination plan and two
manuscripts for publication as well as
presentations at two national
conferences. The final report costs
include the writing of a draft and final
report.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
23269
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices
EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED COST
Cost component
Total
Annualized cost
Administration ..................................................................................................................................................
Research Plan .................................................................................................................................................
Dissemination Plan ..........................................................................................................................................
Final Report .....................................................................................................................................................
Overhead .........................................................................................................................................................
$24,474
591,788
63,397
46,501
273,816
$8,158
197,263
21,132
15,500
91,272
Total ..........................................................................................................................................................
999,976
333,325
Request for Comments
In accordance with tile above-cited
Paperwork Reduction Act legislation,
comments on AHRQ’s information
collection are requested with regard to
any of the following: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ healthcare research and
healthcare information dissemination
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of AHRQ’s estimate of
burden (including hours and costs) of
the proposed collection(s) of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–10197 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Apr 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
information collection project:
‘‘Assessing the Impact of the National
Implementation of TeamSTEPPS Master
Training Program.’’ In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520, AHRQ invites the public to
comment on this proposed information
collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must
he received by July 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Assessing the Impact of the National
Implementation of TeamSTEPPS Master
Training Program
As part of their effort to fulfill their
mission goals, AHRQ, in collaboration
with the Department of Defense’s (DoD)
Tricare Management Activity (TMA),
developed TeamSTEPPS® (aka Team
Strategies and Tools for Enhancing
Performance and Patient Safety) to
provide an evidence-based suite of tools
and strategies for training teamworkbased patient safety to health care
professionals. In 2007, AHRQ and DoD
coordinated the national
implementation of the TeamSTEPPS
program. The main objective of this
program is to improve patient safety by
training a select group of stakeholders
such as Quality Improvement
Organization (QIO) personnel, High
Reliability Organization (HRO) staff and
healthcare system staff in various
teamwork, communication, and patient
safety concepts, tools, and techniques
and ultimately helping to build a
national infrastructure for supporting
teamwork-based patient safety efforts in
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
healthcare organizations and at the state
level. The implementation includes the
training of Master Trainers in various
health care systems capable of
stimulating the utilization and adoption
of TeamSTEPPS in their health care
delivery systems, providing technical
assistance and consultation on
implementing TeamSTEPPS, and
developing various channels of learning
(e.g., user networks, various educational
venues) for continuation support and
improvement of teamwork in
healthcare. During this effort, AHRQ has
trained a corps of 2400 participants to
serve as the Master Trainer
infrastructure supporting national
adoption of TeamSTEPPS. Participants
in training become Master Trainers in
TeamSTEPPS and are afforded the
opportunity to observe the tools and
strategies provided in the program in
action. In addition to developing a corps
of Master Trainers, AHRQ has also
developed a series of support
mechanisms for this effort including a
data collection Web tool, a
TeamSTEPPS call support center, and a
monthly consortium to address any
challenges encountered by
implementers of TeamSTEPPS.
To understand the extent to which
this infrastructure of patient safety
knowledge and skills has been created,
AHRQ will conduct an evaluation of the
National Implementation of
TeamSTEPPS Master Training program.
The goals of this evaluation are to
examine the extent to which training
participants have been able to:
(1) Implement the TeamSTEPPS
products, concepts, tools, and
techniques in their home organizations
and,
(2) the extent to which participants
have spread that training, knowledge,
and skills to their organizations, local
areas, regions, and states.
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, American
Institutes for Research (AIR), pursuant
to AHRQ’s statutory authority to
conduct and support research on
healthcare and on systems for the
delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality,
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23266-23269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10197]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project: ``Standardizing Antibiotic Use in Long-Term Care Settings
SAUL) Study.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501-3520, AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed
information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by July 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection
instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be
obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Standardizing Antibiotic Use in Long-Term Care Settings (SAUL)
Study Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing practices by primary
care clinicians caring for residents in long-term care (LTC)
communities is becoming a major public health concern as it is a risk
factor for morbidity and mortality among LTC residents. Antibiotics are
among the most commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals in LTC settings, yet
reports indicate that a high proportion of antibiotic prescriptions are
inappropriate. The adverse consequences of inappropriate prescribing
practices are serious and include drug reactions/interactions,
secondary complications, and the emergence of multi-drug resistant
organisms.
In an effort to reduce antibiotic overprescribing, Loeb and
colleagues developed minimum criteria for the initiation of antibiotics
in LTC setting (Loeb, M., et al. 2001). The criteria have been tested
in several studies, but their implementation and tests of validity have
been limited. In particular, though Loeb and colleagues developed
distinct minimum criteria for several types of infection (skin and
soft-tissue, respiratory, urinary tract, and unexplained fever), a
rigorous evaluation has been conducted only for urinary tract
infections.
Twelve nursing homes (NH) will participate in this project; six NHs
will be recruited to serve as treatment sites and six to serve as
control sites. Once a nursing home community has been selected and
randomly assigned to the treatment or control group, a facility
recruitment letter will be sent to the facility Administrator. The
letter will include a description of the study and inform the
Administrator that the
[[Page 23267]]
project manager will be calling in the near future to further discuss
the project and answers any questions that he/she might have regarding
the program.
The objectives of the study are to:
1. Implement a quality improvement (QI) intervention program to
optimize antibiotic prescribing practices;
2. Evaluate the effect of the QI intervention on antibiotic
prescribing practices including validation of the Loeb minimum
criteria; and
3. Develop and execute a dissemination plan to ensure wide
dissemination of the findings and recommendations for improving
antibiotic prescribing behaviors in LTC settings.
To address the first study objective, the research team will
conduct a six-month QI intervention program in the six treatment sites
to improve antibiotic prescribing practices. The intervention
incorporates investigative evidence including the Loeb algorithms. QI
program procedures are documented in the draft intervention manual,
including the Loeb algorithms. The protocol recognizes that not all
factors will need attention in all instances, as (for example) some NHs
may already be vigilant to advance directive completion. The QI program
is intended for facilities to self-implement and monitor with guidance
provided from the research team upon request.
In order to validate the Loeb Criteria and to test the efficacy of
the QI intervention, recruited facilities will be matched in pairs with
respect to bedsize, profit status and location (urban, suburban, rural)
and within each pair, one facility will be randomized to each study arm
(treatment and control).
This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractors, Abt
Associates and the University of North Carolina, pursuant to AHRQ's
statutory authority to conduct and support research on healthcare and
on systems for the delivery of such care, including activities with
respect to the quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and
value of healthcare services and with respect to quality measurement
and improvement. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
Method of Collection
The following data collection activities and trainings will be
implemented to achieve the first two objectives of this project:
(1) Pre-implementation semi-structured interviews will be conducted
separately with physicians, facility administrators and with the
director of nursing (DON) or nurse educators (see Attachment D for each
type of pre-implementation interview) from the six treatment sites. The
purpose of these interviews is to generate ideas on how best to
implement the new procedures and what approaches work best across
facilities. Related risk factors and remedial strategies also will be
identified. These interviews will take place during the three month
baseline period and feedback will be used to modify the intervention
materials as appropriate.
(2) Administrator interviews will be conducted at the time of
facility enrollment to collect facility-level data in order to describe
the sample and to explore linkages to prescribing practices. General
facility-level descriptors including size (number of beds), profit
status, location (urban, suburban, rural), and staffing levels (number
of full and part-time registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and
nurse aides) will be collected. Additionally, simple summary (facility-
level) information regarding resident demographics will be collected
(e.g. age, gender, race/ethnicity, proportion long-stay vs. post-acute/
rehab). Facility data will be collected through interviews with the
Administrator at all twelve facilities.
(3) Train-the-trainer training will be conducted during the
baseline period (prior to the implementation of the intervention).
Research staff will present information about the Antibiotic Use QI and
Monitoring Program at one, two-hour in-person meeting held at each
treatment site. The research team will work with physicians (the
physician champion at each facility; a physician champion is an expert
that provides education, champions a cause or product, or gives support
to staff around the diffusion and implementation of clinical practice
guidelines, protocols, or research evidence), administrators, directors
of nursing and nurse educators using a train-the-trainer model to offer
guidance on educating intervention site staff on how to implement the
Antibiotic Use QI Program that is based on the Loeb criteria.
Intervention and training materials include those products and
strategies used in other successful projects (e.g., written Loeb
algorithms).
(4) Train-the-nurses training will be conducted by the nurse
educator at each of the six treatment sites following the train-the-
trainer training. The nurse educator will introduce the facility nurses
to the Antibiotic Use Ql and Monitoring Program materials and train
them on the use of the Loeb minimum criteria. This training will be
offered two times at regularly scheduled in-service meetings; however
each nurse will be required to attend only one session.
(5) Train-the-physicians training will be conducted by the
physician champion at each of the six treatment sites following the
train-the-trainer training. The project team will be present to address
any questions regarding the study. The physician champion will
introduce the facility physicians to the Antibiotic Use QI and
Monitoring Program materials and discuss with them the use of the Loeb
minimum criteria. An average of five physicians at each facility will
be individually contacted by the physician champion to discuss the use
of the Loeb criteria. Each physician will have received a letter with
the study description and the Loeb criteria prior to contact by the
physician champion.
(6) Medical record reviews (MMR) will be conducted by research
staff to collect primary outcome data to determine antibiotic
prescribing. Primary outcomes will be obtained by monthly chart review
for a period of nine months: three months preceding the initiation of
the QI intervention (for which the charts of all residents will be
abstracted), and each month for six months following the inception of
the program (for which the charts of all residents will be abstracted,
regardless of whether or not they are discharged from the setting or
die) at all 12 facilities (treatment and control) by trained research
staff from current (not archival) records. Since this data collection
will not impose a burden on the facility staff OMB clearance is not
required.
(7) Final semi-structured interviews with QI team members including
physicians, facility administrators, and other key facility staff will
be conducted at the completion of the intervention to determine their
perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to successful program
implementation.
(8) Nurse survey will be administered to nurses in all twelve
facilities in the month prior to program implementation, and again in
the final month of implementation. The purpose of this survey is to
collect secondary outcome data regarding the antibiotic prescribing
decision-making process and to collect basic information about each
nurse, such as their title, type of degree and years worked in a LTC
facility.
(9) Physician survey will be administered in all twelve facilities
in the month prior to program implementation, and again in the final
month of implementation. Similar to the nurse survey, the purpose of
this survey is to collect secondary outcome data regarding the
antibiotic prescribing
[[Page 23268]]
decision-making process and to collect basic information about each
physician.
In response to the third study objective, AHRQ will draw upon its
extensive experience of successfully disseminating information through
varying strategies. To assist in designing a plan that has ``real
world'' impact, AHRQ's Dissemination Planning Tool will be utilized.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the
respondents' time to participate in this research. Pre-implementation
semi-structured interviews will be conducted with 3 staff members from
each of the 6 intervention sites and will last about 1 hour. The
administrator interviews will be completed with one administrator from
each of the 12 participating NHs and will require 15 minutes. Train-
the-trainer training will include 4 persons from each of the 6
intervention sites and will last 2 hours. Train-the-nurses training
will be conducted with 24 nurses from each of the intervention sites;
the number of responses per NH is 26 since the nurse trainer is an
employee of the NH and will conduct the training twice, with about 12
nurses in each training. The nurse training will last about 1 hour.
Train-the-physician training will be conducted with 5 physicians from
each of the 6 intervention sites; the number of responses per NH is 6
since the physician trainer is affiliated with the NH. The physician
training will last about 30 minutes.
Final semi-structured interviews will include 4 QI team members
from each of the 6 intervention sites, at the completion of the
intervention, and will last one hour. The nurse survey will be
administered twice to 24 nurses from each of the 12 participating NHs
and will take about 15 minutes to complete. The physician survey will
be administered twice to 5 physicians from each of the 12 facilities
and requires 15 minutes to complete. The total annualized burden hours
are estimated to be 441 hours.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annual cost burden to the respondent,
based on their time to participate in this research. The annual cost
burden is estimated to be $25,204.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Form name Number of responses per Hours per Total burden
nursing homes nursing home response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-implementation semi-structured 6 3 1 18
interviews.............................
Administrator Interviews................ 12 1 15/60 3
Train-the-trainer training.............. 6 4 2 48
Train-the-nurses training............... 6 26 1 156
Train-the-physicians training........... 6 6 30/60 18
Final Semi-Structured Interview......... 6 4 1 24
Nurse survey............................ 12 48 15/60 144
Physician survey........................ 12 10 15/60 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 66 n/a n/a 441
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 2--Estimated annualized cost burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Total burden Average hourly Total cost
Form name nursing homes hours wage rate * burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-implementation semi-structured 6 18 ** 51.68 $930
interviews.............................
Administrator Interviews................ 12 3 *** 46.59 140
Train-the-trainer training.............. 6 48 31.31 1,503
Train-the-nurses training............... 6 156 77.64 12,112
Train-the-physicians training........... 6 18 31.31 564
Final Semi-Structured Interview......... 6 24 77.64 1,863
Nurse survey............................ 12 144 *** 46.59 6,709
Physician survey........................ 12 30 46.10 1,383
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 66 441 n/a 25,204
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Based upon the mean of the average wages, National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, U.S. Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. May 2008.
** Average wages for one registered nurse ($31.31), one physician ($77.64), and one Administrator ($46.10);
*** Average wages for two registered nurse ($31.31), one physician ($77.64), and one Administrator ($46.10).
Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government
Exhibit 3 shows the total and annualized cost for conducting this
research. The total budget for this three year study is $999,976. The
administration task includes costs associated with the initial kick-off
conference call with AHRQ and monthly progress reports and ongoing
conference calls. The research plan task includes costs to finalize the
research plan; conduct the literature search; prepare and submit the
IRB applications and OMB package; recruit facilities; collect baseline
and monthly data from medical record reviews and conduct pre- and post-
intervention provider interviews; implement the intervention; and write
the final report on the explanatory model. The dissemination costs
include the writing of a dissemination plan and two manuscripts for
publication as well as presentations at two national conferences. The
final report costs include the writing of a draft and final report.
[[Page 23269]]
Exhibit 3--Estimated Total and Annualized Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost component Total Annualized cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administration...................... $24,474 $8,158
Research Plan....................... 591,788 197,263
Dissemination Plan.................. 63,397 21,132
Final Report........................ 46,501 15,500
Overhead............................ 273,816 91,272
-----------------------------------
Total........................... 999,976 333,325
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comments
In accordance with tile above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act
legislation, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ healthcare research and healthcare information dissemination
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours
and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information upon the respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-10197 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M