Lake Wales Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, Highlands and Polk Counties, FL, 22832-22835 [2010-10117]
Download as PDF
22832
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Tonopah NV 89049
Landholding Agency: Energy
Property Number: 41201020001
Status: Excess
Directions: Nellis AFB
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
New Jersey
3 Tracts
Delaware Water Nat’l Rec. Area
Montague Co: Sussex NJ 07827
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020002
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Nos. 10839–5, 11233, and 11400
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
8 Tracts
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Walpack NJ 07881
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020003
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Nos. 7055–1, 7107–1, 7613, 7820–
2, 8201, 8215–1, and 8215–2
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Tract 603–1
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Pahaquarry Co: Warren NJ 07825
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020004
Status: Unutilized
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Tract 10208
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Sandyston Co: Sussex NJ 07826
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020005
Status: Unutilized
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Oregon
Painted Hills Quarter
37375 Bear Creek Rd.
Mitchell Co: Wheeler OR 97750
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020006
Status: Unutilized
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Pennsylvania
9 Tracts
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Dingmans Ferry Co: Pike PA 18328
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020007
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Nos. 1077, 8548, 8548-#51, 10139,
10552, 10964, 11329, 11904, and 12104
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
3 Bldgs.
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Middle Smithfield Co: Monroe PA 18301
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020008
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Bldg Nos. 919, 1359, and 1522
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Tract 7300
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Bushkill Co: Pike PA 18324
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020009
Status: Unutilized
Reasons: Floodway and Extensive
deterioration
3 Tracts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:41 Apr 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Delaware Water Gap Nat’l Rec. Area
Milford Co: Pike PA 18337
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020010
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Nos. 12415, 12424, and 12848
Reasons: Floodway and Extensive
deterioration
Virginia
Bldg. SDA–215
Naval Support Activity
Norfolk VA 23551
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201020006
Status: Excess
Reasons: Secured Area and Extensive
deterioration
Washington
Watermaster’s Office
205 N. Washington Way
George Co: Grant WA 98848
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201020011
Status: Unutilized
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
4 Bldgs.
Naval Base
Kitsap WA
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201020005
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Bldg. Nos. 499, 806, 929, and
5436
Reasons: Secured Area
Land
Maryland
Site A: 6.2 acres
Naval Support Activity
Indian Head MD 20640
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201020003
Status: Underutilized
Reasons: Secured Area
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N284; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Lake Wales Ridge National Wildlife
Refuge, Highlands and Polk Counties,
FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Lake
Wales Ridge National Wildlife Refuge
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Lake Wales Ridge NWR. We
started the process through a notice in
the Federal Register on June 20, 2008
(73 FR 35149). For more about the
refuge and our CCP process, please see
that notice.
Lake Wales Ridge NWR is a unit of
the Merritt Island National Wildlife
Refuge Complex (NWR Complex) and is
administered by and co-managed with
Pelican Island and Archie Carr National
Wildlife Refuges, colloquially termed
the Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge Complex (NWR Complex).
Background
[FR Doc. 2010–9766 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
(NWR) for public review and comment.
In this Draft CCP/EA, we describe the
alternative we propose to use to manage
this refuge for the 15 years following
approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the Draft CCP/EA by writing to: Mr. Bill
Miller, Lake Wales Ridge NWR, Pelican
Island National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach,
FL 32960; telephone: 561/715–0023.
You may also access and download the
document from the Service’s Web site at
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
‘‘Draft Documents.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bill Miller, Lake Wales Ridge NWR,
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
Complex; telephone: 561/715–0023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife
refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with
a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices
every 15 years in accordance with the
Administration Act.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
‘‘Alternative B’’ as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
Alternative A—Current Management
(No Action)
Alternative A would continue present
management activities and programs.
Management emphasis would continue
to focus on maintaining existing habitats
for rare, threatened, and endangered
species through partnerships and
management agreements. Primary
management activities would continue
to include providing infrequent and
limited habitat management through: (1)
Application of prescribed fire (Merritt
Island NWR Complex provides fire
program staff); (2) rare, threatened, and
endangered species monitoring,
utilizing partnerships; (3) litter and
debris control; and (4) exotic, invasive,
and nuisance species’ control.
Alternative A represents the anticipated
conditions of the refuge for the next 15
years, assuming current funding,
staffing, policies, programs, and
activities continue.
This alternative would reflect actions
that include managing habitats for rare,
threatened, and endangered species.
Both Federal- and State-listed species
are found on the refuge. Habitat
management actions are intended to
benefit rare, threatened, and endangered
species, but there is limited active
management of other species and
habitats due to the current level of
resources. As a result, the refuge would
continue to rely almost entirely on the
actions and assistance of partners and
volunteers who conduct a wide array of
resource management activities,
including monitoring of key refuge
resources.
Management coordination would
occur primarily between the refuge and
the Lake Wales Ridge Ecosystem
Working Group (LWREWG)—a
consortium of Federal, State, local, and
non-governmental land management
organizations. The LWREWG shares
natural area management information in
an effort to increase the understanding
and awareness of the Lake Wales Ridge
ecosystem.
Land acquisition would continue
based on the availability of willing
sellers within the refuge’s approved
acquisition boundary, and where
opportunities arise, through the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:41 Apr 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
LWREWG, or other initiatives on a caseby-case basis. Since the refuge is neither
staffed nor funded, management
agreements with partner agencies/
organizations would be a primary focus.
The refuge would remain closed, and
access for management purposes would
be conducted solely through the refuge’s
special use permit process. On a caseby-case basis, extremely limited access
for environmental education and
interpretation opportunities might
occur. The refuge would actively
support key Lake Wales Ridge
ecosystem partner-managed lands that
are open to public use by identifying
and updating links to partner Web sites
on the refuge’s official Web site.
The refuge would remain unstaffed
and administered through the Pelican
Island NWR Complex. Volunteer
activities would continue to be
supported through the Merritt Island
Wildlife Association and the Pelican
Island NWR Complex staff. Partnerships
through the LWREWG and the Service’s
North and South Florida Ecological
Services field offices would continue.
The refuge would continue to
opportunistically seek funding for
habitat management, monitoring, and
other program areas through alternative
sources.
Alternative B—Rare, Threatened, and
Endangered Species (Proposed Action)
This alternative expands the actions
under Alternative A with a greater
amount of habitat management focusing
primarily on restoring and enhancing
habitats to benefit the needs of rare,
threatened, and endangered species. A
total of 17 plants and 6 animals are
federally listed species on the 1,842-acre
refuge; 1 federal candidate species is
known to occur on the refuge. Some of
these species are protected nowhere else
but on refuge lands. In addition, this
endemic-rich refuge is home to at least
33 State-listed species, including 5 plant
and 6 animal species that are not listed
federally.
One key to this alternative is a
focused effort to expand management
activities through the implementation of
a frequent, routine prescribed fire
program to restore pyrogenic habitats to
pre-fire exclusion conditions. This
focused approach would provide for the
restoration of a mosaic of suitable
habitats, including xeric scrub lands,
sandhills, open sand patches, and
ephemeral wetlands necessary to
maintain and expand populations of the
refuge’s rare, threatened, and
endangered species. This restorative
process may exceed the 15-year life of
the CCP for some habitats. Once pre-fire
exclusion conditions are attained, fire
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22833
return intervals would be adapted based
on rare, threatened, and endangered
species and habitat responses provided
through fire effects monitoring. As
habitats are restored, the refuge would
investigate potential expansion of rare,
threatened, or endangered species
introduction/reintroduction projects,
coordinating and collaborating with
partners through the LWREWG to
identify best management opportunities.
This alternative would expand the
monitoring efforts under Alternative A
to provide additional active efforts to
monitor rare, threatened, and
endangered species. Monitoring efforts
would be increased by the assistance of
additional staff and trained volunteers,
and through academic research. Greater
effort would be made to recruit
academic researchers to study and
monitor rare, threatened, and
endangered species. Under this
alternative, we would increase efforts to
control invasive and nuisance species;
increase coordination with researchers
and partners to investigate rare,
threatened, and endangered species’
response to changing patterns of
suitable habitats; and assume a
leadership role in identifying the
impacts of climate change on rare,
threatened, and endangered species.
This alternative would continue
pursuing completion of the acquisition
boundary, based on the availability of
willing sellers, and prioritizing
acquisition efforts on unprotected,
undeveloped inholdings where threats
of habitat loss and constraints to habitat
management are greatest. We would
evaluate a variety of land protection and
conservation measures, including land
swaps, to protect high-quality
properties.
Expanding public awareness and
support for the refuge and partnermanaged lands of the Lake Wales Ridge
ecosystem would be an important
component of this alternative. Even
though the refuge would remain closed
to visitor use, we would implement a
range of visitor service opportunities
(e.g., environmental education and
interpretation, and wildlife observation
and photography), which would be
controlled through an approval process.
We would implement guided tours
provided by Service staff or Service
partners on a case-by-case basis and
permitted through our special use
permit process. In addition, we would
develop and conduct an annual refuge
day where guided tours, information,
and refuge awareness through
community outreach would be
provided. Updated messages on both the
refuge’s Web site and brochure would
be provided, focusing on the needs of
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
22834
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices
rare, threatened, and endangered
species. Further, we would work with
partners to incorporate these messages
in information distributed by them.
We would increase involvement with
governmental and non-governmental
partners through the LWREWG and
would be positioned to increase Service
presence with other partner
organizations when opportunities arise.
Coordination with both the North and
South Florida Ecological Services field
offices for funding and recovery
direction would be expanded to
optimize listed species management.
Opportunities to build additional
support through the Merritt Island
Wildlife Association, Pelican Island
Preservation Society, and Friends of the
Carr Refuge would increase.
The refuge would gain staff to fulfill
the goals, objectives, and strategies
identified in the CCP, and staff would
be situated to manage all day-to-day
operations. The Lake Wales Ridge NWR
is presently administered remotely and
has no dedicated staff or budget. The
refuge is approximately 130 miles from
fire management support (Merritt Island
NWR Complex) and approximately 100
miles from its Pelican Island NWR
Complex management team. This
situation considerably challenges all
day-to-day operations and management
necessary to provide for the needs of
rare, threatened, and endangered
species and the habitats they occupy.
This alternative would propose a
5-member staff, including a wildlife
refuge specialist (assistant refuge
manager), a private lands biologist, a
botanist/biologist, a biological science
technician, and a fire/forestry
technician to manage refuge programs
and provide a Service presence
currently lacking in the Lake Wales
Ridge system of naturally managed
lands. The proposed staff would be in
close proximity to refuge lands in order
to manage day-to-day operations. To
support operations and maintenance,
we would enter into memoranda of
understanding or other agreements with
partners and/or secure independent
spaces for equipment storage,
operational functions, and
administrative needs. This alternative
would bolster management by
investigating opportunities to enter into
management agreements and other
options with partner land management
agencies and organizations, enabling
partner management of Service
properties in accordance with the CCP,
subsequent step-down plans, and
Service policies. We would continue to
share facilities, equipment, utilities, and
staff with Pelican Island and Archie
Carr National Wildlife Refuges. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:41 Apr 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Merritt Island NWR Complex would
continue to provide fire program staff.
Alternative C—Wildlife and Habitat
Diversity
This alternative would serve the
needs of key rare, threatened, and
endangered species on the refuge, but
within the larger context of wildlife and
habitat diversity. Under this alternative,
focused efforts utilizing prescribed fire
to restore habitats to pre-fire exclusion
conditions would be proposed, targeting
the needs of a wide array of native
wildlife and habitats to benefit the
larger Lake Wales Ridge and central
Florida landscape. We would continue
to support recovery efforts of key listed
species and expand efforts to provide
opportunities targeting the needs of
neotropical migratory birds, resident
birds, wading and water birds,
shorebirds, raptors, cavity-dependent
species, and other resident species.
Habitats where pines dominate the
overstory would be managed to provide
more pine stems per acre to promote
habitat for cavity-dependent birds.
Understory, shrub, and canopy
vegetation would be managed to provide
for a diversity of wildlife, and snag
development would be encouraged to
provide cavities and perch sites and to
promote insect development. Where
appropriate, burn frequencies would be
reduced to provide for the production of
saw palmetto for use as forage by
wildlife, including the Florida black
bear. We would investigate management
opportunities with the Atlantic Coast
Joint Venture and would support
management of migratory birds.
Through partnerships, we would
conduct wading and water bird surveys
to better understand our management
role at the landscape level. Management
to protect important habitat and wildlife
corridors would increase under this
alternative and invasive and nuisance
species control efforts would expand.
This alternative would expand the
monitoring efforts under Alternative A.
Monitoring of neotropical migratory and
resident birds in addition to other
resident species would occur.
Monitoring efforts would be increased
by the assistance of additional staff and
trained volunteers, and through
academic research. We would take a
leadership role in identifying the
impacts of climate change on refuge
resources, coordinating with researchers
and partners to investigate species
response to changing patterns of
suitable habitats.
Under this alternative, the refuge
would remain closed to visitor use
except for limited and guided
environmental education and
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interpretation and wildlife observation
and photography opportunities by
Service staff or volunteers and partners.
Education, interpretation, and outreach
messages would focus on the
importance of the refuge in the
landscape, and would include listed
species as key topics. Further, we would
work with the partners to incorporate
applicable messages into their visitor
activities and signage. We would
develop and conduct an annual refuge
day to promote refuge awareness. This
alternative would seek to expand
partnerships and would work with the
partners, including the LWREWG
environmental education subcommittee,
to expand environmental education and
interpretation opportunities on refuge
lands.
As under Alternative B, we would
gain staff to be located locally to manage
all day-to-day operations of the refuge.
This alternative would propose a 4member staff, including a wildlife
refuge specialist (assistant refuge
manager), a private lands biologist, a
botanist/biologist, and a fire/forestry
technician. To support operations and
maintenance, we would enter into
memoranda of understanding or other
agreements with the partners and/or
secure independent spaces for
equipment storage, operational
functions, and refuge administrative
needs. This alternative also would
bolster management by investigating
opportunities to enter into management
agreements and other options with
partner land management agencies and
organizations, enabling partner
management of Service properties in
accordance with the CCP, subsequent
step-down plans, and Service policies.
We would continue to share facilities,
equipment, utilities, and staff with
Pelican Island and Archie Carr National
Wildlife Refuges. The Merritt Island
NWR Complex would continue to
provide fire program staff.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices
may request documents by U.S. mail or
phone (see below). Please address
written comments to Diane K. Noda,
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003. You may
alternatively send comments by
facsimile to (805) 644–3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jen
Lechuga, HCP Coordinator, at the
Ventura address above, or by telephone
at (805) 644–1766, extension 224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
This notice is published under the
authority of the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, Public Law 105–57.
Dated: February 18, 2010.
Jon Andrew,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–10117 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Background
[FWS–R8–ES–2010–N087; 1112–0000–
81440–F2]
The Mount Hermon June beetle was
listed as endangered on January 24,
1997 (62 FR 3616). Section 9 of the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and our
implementing Federal regulations in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR part 17 prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of fish
or wildlife species listed as endangered
or threatened. Take of listed fish or
wildlife is defined under the Act as ‘‘to
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1532). However,
under limited circumstances, we issue
permits to authorize incidental take (i.e.,
take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, the carrying out of an
otherwise lawful activity). Regulations
governing incidental take permits for
threatened and endangered species are
at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
The Act’s take prohibitions do not apply
to Federally listed plants on private
lands unless such take would violate
State law. In addition to meeting other
criteria, an incidental take permit’s
proposed actions must not jeopardize
the existence of Federally listed fish,
wildlife, or plants.
Reconstruction of the home’s failing
foundation and construction of a
retaining wall for the Menchine HCP
would take place within a 0.44-acre
parcel (APN 060–361–03) located at 6
Lyle Way near the city of Santa Cruz,
Santa Cruz County, California. The
parcel contains Zayante sand soils and
vegetation consisting primarily of
landscaping. The parcel is presumed to
be occupied by the Mount Hermon June
beetle, as the species is known to occur
approximately 650 feet to the north of
the property. Implementation of the
project would result in impacts to a total
of 0.05 acre (1,993 sq ft) of habitat for
the Mount Hermon June beetle. Impacts
would result in the permanent loss of
0.04 acre (1,543 sq ft) and the temporary
loss of 0.01 acre (450 sq ft) of Mount
Hermon June beetle habitat. The
Menchines propose to implement the
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Permits, Santa Cruz
County, CA
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
applications from William Menchine
and Alicia Stanton and the San Lorenzo
Valley Water District (applicants) for
incidental take permits under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We are considering
issuing permits that would authorize the
applicants’ take of the Federally
endangered Mount Hermon June beetle
(Polyphylla barbata) incidental to
otherwise lawful activities that would
result in the permanent loss of 0.05 acre
(2,182 square feet (sq ft)) of Mount
Hermon June beetle habitat near Santa
Cruz, Santa Cruz County, California. We
invite comments from the public on the
applications, which include Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs) that fully
describe the proposed projects and
measures the applicants would
undertake to minimize and mitigate
anticipated take of the species. We also
invite comments on our preliminary
determination that the HCPs qualify as
‘‘low-effect’’ plans, eligible for
categorical exclusions under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended. We
explain the basis for this determination
in our draft Environmental Action
Statements and associated Low-Effect
Screening Forms, both of which are also
available for review.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by June 1,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy
of the permit applications, plans, and
related documents on the Internet at
https://www.fws.gov/ventura/, or you
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:41 Apr 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22835
following measures to minimize and
mitigate for the loss of Mount Hermon
June beetle habitat within the permit
area: (1) Applicants will purchase 0.05
acre (1,993 sq ft) of conservation credits
at the Ben Lomond Sandhills Preserve
of the Zayante Sandhills Conservation
Bank, operated by PCO, LLC; (2) a
qualified biologist will oversee
construction and provide worker
training on the Mount Hermon June
beetle and requirements of the HCP; (3)
temporary fencing will be installed to
demarcate the impact area from the
remainder of the property; (4) any life
stages of the Mount Hermon June beetle
will be captured and relocated if one is
observed in an area that would be
impacted; (5) dust control measures will
be implemented to reduce impacts to
the Mount Hermon June beetle and its
habitat; (6) the 0.01-acre (450-sq-ft) area
of temporary habitat disturbance will be
revegetated with native Sandhills plant
species; and (7) all exposed soils will be
covered with impermeable material if
construction occurs during the species’
flight season.
The Menchine HCP considers three
alternatives to the taking of Mount
Hermon June beetle. The No Action
alternative would maintain current
conditions, the project would not be
implemented, and an incidental take
permit application would not be
submitted to the Service. The second
alternative would involve a redesign of
the project. The project would be
reduced in scale under this alternative;
however, is not practical, as the home’s
foundation requires repair, and a
retaining wall is necessary for slope
stabilization. The third alternative is the
proposed action, which includes issuing
an incidental take permit to the
applicants, who would then implement
the HCP.
Construction of a pump house and
˜
pipeline for the Manana Woods HCP
would take place primarily at 140 Elena
Court (APN 067–081–55), a 10.6-acre
parcel, with a small portion crossing
through 324 Blueberry Drive (APN 067–
081–41), a 1.8-acre parcel. Both parcels
are located just southwest of the City of
Scotts Valley, Santa Cruz County,
California. The applicant has received
authorization from the two landowners
to implement the project on private
land. Both parcels contain Zayante sand
soils with vegetation consisting of
native and nonnative plant species and
mixed evergreen forest. The parcels are
presumed to be occupied by the Mount
Hermon June beetle, as the species is
known to occur at several locations
within 0.75 mile of the project area.
˜
The Manana Woods project would
result in impacts to a total of 0.05 acre
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22832-22835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10117]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2009-N284; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Lake Wales Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, Highlands and Polk
Counties, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Lake Wales Ridge National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR) for public review and comment. In this Draft CCP/
EA, we describe the alternative we propose to use to manage this refuge
for the 15 years following approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the Draft CCP/EA by writing to: Mr.
Bill Miller, Lake Wales Ridge NWR, Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge Complex, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960; telephone: 561/
715-0023. You may also access and download the document from the
Service's Web site at https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under ``Draft
Documents.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bill Miller, Lake Wales Ridge NWR,
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex; telephone: 561/715-
0023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Lake Wales Ridge
NWR. We started the process through a notice in the Federal Register on
June 20, 2008 (73 FR 35149). For more about the refuge and our CCP
process, please see that notice.
Lake Wales Ridge NWR is a unit of the Merritt Island National
Wildlife Refuge Complex (NWR Complex) and is administered by and co-
managed with Pelican Island and Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuges,
colloquially termed the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex
(NWR Complex).
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for each national
wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management,
conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to
outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their
habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education
and interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least
[[Page 22833]]
every 15 years in accordance with the Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for managing the refuge and chose
``Alternative B'' as the proposed alternative. A full description of
each alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We summarize each alternative
below.
Alternative A--Current Management (No Action)
Alternative A would continue present management activities and
programs. Management emphasis would continue to focus on maintaining
existing habitats for rare, threatened, and endangered species through
partnerships and management agreements. Primary management activities
would continue to include providing infrequent and limited habitat
management through: (1) Application of prescribed fire (Merritt Island
NWR Complex provides fire program staff); (2) rare, threatened, and
endangered species monitoring, utilizing partnerships; (3) litter and
debris control; and (4) exotic, invasive, and nuisance species'
control. Alternative A represents the anticipated conditions of the
refuge for the next 15 years, assuming current funding, staffing,
policies, programs, and activities continue.
This alternative would reflect actions that include managing
habitats for rare, threatened, and endangered species. Both Federal-
and State-listed species are found on the refuge. Habitat management
actions are intended to benefit rare, threatened, and endangered
species, but there is limited active management of other species and
habitats due to the current level of resources. As a result, the refuge
would continue to rely almost entirely on the actions and assistance of
partners and volunteers who conduct a wide array of resource management
activities, including monitoring of key refuge resources.
Management coordination would occur primarily between the refuge
and the Lake Wales Ridge Ecosystem Working Group (LWREWG)--a consortium
of Federal, State, local, and non-governmental land management
organizations. The LWREWG shares natural area management information in
an effort to increase the understanding and awareness of the Lake Wales
Ridge ecosystem.
Land acquisition would continue based on the availability of
willing sellers within the refuge's approved acquisition boundary, and
where opportunities arise, through the LWREWG, or other initiatives on
a case-by-case basis. Since the refuge is neither staffed nor funded,
management agreements with partner agencies/organizations would be a
primary focus.
The refuge would remain closed, and access for management purposes
would be conducted solely through the refuge's special use permit
process. On a case-by-case basis, extremely limited access for
environmental education and interpretation opportunities might occur.
The refuge would actively support key Lake Wales Ridge ecosystem
partner-managed lands that are open to public use by identifying and
updating links to partner Web sites on the refuge's official Web site.
The refuge would remain unstaffed and administered through the
Pelican Island NWR Complex. Volunteer activities would continue to be
supported through the Merritt Island Wildlife Association and the
Pelican Island NWR Complex staff. Partnerships through the LWREWG and
the Service's North and South Florida Ecological Services field offices
would continue. The refuge would continue to opportunistically seek
funding for habitat management, monitoring, and other program areas
through alternative sources.
Alternative B--Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species (Proposed
Action)
This alternative expands the actions under Alternative A with a
greater amount of habitat management focusing primarily on restoring
and enhancing habitats to benefit the needs of rare, threatened, and
endangered species. A total of 17 plants and 6 animals are federally
listed species on the 1,842-acre refuge; 1 federal candidate species is
known to occur on the refuge. Some of these species are protected
nowhere else but on refuge lands. In addition, this endemic-rich refuge
is home to at least 33 State-listed species, including 5 plant and 6
animal species that are not listed federally.
One key to this alternative is a focused effort to expand
management activities through the implementation of a frequent, routine
prescribed fire program to restore pyrogenic habitats to pre-fire
exclusion conditions. This focused approach would provide for the
restoration of a mosaic of suitable habitats, including xeric scrub
lands, sandhills, open sand patches, and ephemeral wetlands necessary
to maintain and expand populations of the refuge's rare, threatened,
and endangered species. This restorative process may exceed the 15-year
life of the CCP for some habitats. Once pre-fire exclusion conditions
are attained, fire return intervals would be adapted based on rare,
threatened, and endangered species and habitat responses provided
through fire effects monitoring. As habitats are restored, the refuge
would investigate potential expansion of rare, threatened, or
endangered species introduction/reintroduction projects, coordinating
and collaborating with partners through the LWREWG to identify best
management opportunities.
This alternative would expand the monitoring efforts under
Alternative A to provide additional active efforts to monitor rare,
threatened, and endangered species. Monitoring efforts would be
increased by the assistance of additional staff and trained volunteers,
and through academic research. Greater effort would be made to recruit
academic researchers to study and monitor rare, threatened, and
endangered species. Under this alternative, we would increase efforts
to control invasive and nuisance species; increase coordination with
researchers and partners to investigate rare, threatened, and
endangered species' response to changing patterns of suitable habitats;
and assume a leadership role in identifying the impacts of climate
change on rare, threatened, and endangered species.
This alternative would continue pursuing completion of the
acquisition boundary, based on the availability of willing sellers, and
prioritizing acquisition efforts on unprotected, undeveloped inholdings
where threats of habitat loss and constraints to habitat management are
greatest. We would evaluate a variety of land protection and
conservation measures, including land swaps, to protect high-quality
properties.
Expanding public awareness and support for the refuge and partner-
managed lands of the Lake Wales Ridge ecosystem would be an important
component of this alternative. Even though the refuge would remain
closed to visitor use, we would implement a range of visitor service
opportunities (e.g., environmental education and interpretation, and
wildlife observation and photography), which would be controlled
through an approval process. We would implement guided tours provided
by Service staff or Service partners on a case-by-case basis and
permitted through our special use permit process. In addition, we would
develop and conduct an annual refuge day where guided tours,
information, and refuge awareness through community outreach would be
provided. Updated messages on both the refuge's Web site and brochure
would be provided, focusing on the needs of
[[Page 22834]]
rare, threatened, and endangered species. Further, we would work with
partners to incorporate these messages in information distributed by
them.
We would increase involvement with governmental and non-
governmental partners through the LWREWG and would be positioned to
increase Service presence with other partner organizations when
opportunities arise. Coordination with both the North and South Florida
Ecological Services field offices for funding and recovery direction
would be expanded to optimize listed species management. Opportunities
to build additional support through the Merritt Island Wildlife
Association, Pelican Island Preservation Society, and Friends of the
Carr Refuge would increase.
The refuge would gain staff to fulfill the goals, objectives, and
strategies identified in the CCP, and staff would be situated to manage
all day-to-day operations. The Lake Wales Ridge NWR is presently
administered remotely and has no dedicated staff or budget. The refuge
is approximately 130 miles from fire management support (Merritt Island
NWR Complex) and approximately 100 miles from its Pelican Island NWR
Complex management team. This situation considerably challenges all
day-to-day operations and management necessary to provide for the needs
of rare, threatened, and endangered species and the habitats they
occupy.
This alternative would propose a 5-member staff, including a
wildlife refuge specialist (assistant refuge manager), a private lands
biologist, a botanist/biologist, a biological science technician, and a
fire/forestry technician to manage refuge programs and provide a
Service presence currently lacking in the Lake Wales Ridge system of
naturally managed lands. The proposed staff would be in close proximity
to refuge lands in order to manage day-to-day operations. To support
operations and maintenance, we would enter into memoranda of
understanding or other agreements with partners and/or secure
independent spaces for equipment storage, operational functions, and
administrative needs. This alternative would bolster management by
investigating opportunities to enter into management agreements and
other options with partner land management agencies and organizations,
enabling partner management of Service properties in accordance with
the CCP, subsequent step-down plans, and Service policies. We would
continue to share facilities, equipment, utilities, and staff with
Pelican Island and Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuges. The Merritt
Island NWR Complex would continue to provide fire program staff.
Alternative C--Wildlife and Habitat Diversity
This alternative would serve the needs of key rare, threatened, and
endangered species on the refuge, but within the larger context of
wildlife and habitat diversity. Under this alternative, focused efforts
utilizing prescribed fire to restore habitats to pre-fire exclusion
conditions would be proposed, targeting the needs of a wide array of
native wildlife and habitats to benefit the larger Lake Wales Ridge and
central Florida landscape. We would continue to support recovery
efforts of key listed species and expand efforts to provide
opportunities targeting the needs of neotropical migratory birds,
resident birds, wading and water birds, shorebirds, raptors, cavity-
dependent species, and other resident species. Habitats where pines
dominate the overstory would be managed to provide more pine stems per
acre to promote habitat for cavity-dependent birds. Understory, shrub,
and canopy vegetation would be managed to provide for a diversity of
wildlife, and snag development would be encouraged to provide cavities
and perch sites and to promote insect development. Where appropriate,
burn frequencies would be reduced to provide for the production of saw
palmetto for use as forage by wildlife, including the Florida black
bear. We would investigate management opportunities with the Atlantic
Coast Joint Venture and would support management of migratory birds.
Through partnerships, we would conduct wading and water bird surveys to
better understand our management role at the landscape level.
Management to protect important habitat and wildlife corridors would
increase under this alternative and invasive and nuisance species
control efforts would expand.
This alternative would expand the monitoring efforts under
Alternative A. Monitoring of neotropical migratory and resident birds
in addition to other resident species would occur. Monitoring efforts
would be increased by the assistance of additional staff and trained
volunteers, and through academic research. We would take a leadership
role in identifying the impacts of climate change on refuge resources,
coordinating with researchers and partners to investigate species
response to changing patterns of suitable habitats.
Under this alternative, the refuge would remain closed to visitor
use except for limited and guided environmental education and
interpretation and wildlife observation and photography opportunities
by Service staff or volunteers and partners. Education, interpretation,
and outreach messages would focus on the importance of the refuge in
the landscape, and would include listed species as key topics. Further,
we would work with the partners to incorporate applicable messages into
their visitor activities and signage. We would develop and conduct an
annual refuge day to promote refuge awareness. This alternative would
seek to expand partnerships and would work with the partners, including
the LWREWG environmental education subcommittee, to expand
environmental education and interpretation opportunities on refuge
lands.
As under Alternative B, we would gain staff to be located locally
to manage all day-to-day operations of the refuge. This alternative
would propose a 4-member staff, including a wildlife refuge specialist
(assistant refuge manager), a private lands biologist, a botanist/
biologist, and a fire/forestry technician. To support operations and
maintenance, we would enter into memoranda of understanding or other
agreements with the partners and/or secure independent spaces for
equipment storage, operational functions, and refuge administrative
needs. This alternative also would bolster management by investigating
opportunities to enter into management agreements and other options
with partner land management agencies and organizations, enabling
partner management of Service properties in accordance with the CCP,
subsequent step-down plans, and Service policies. We would continue to
share facilities, equipment, utilities, and staff with Pelican Island
and Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuges. The Merritt Island NWR
Complex would continue to provide fire program staff.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
[[Page 22835]]
Authority
This notice is published under the authority of the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105-57.
Dated: February 18, 2010.
Jon Andrew,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-10117 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P