Review of Arbitration Awards; Miscellaneous and General Requirements, 22540-22543 [2010-9996]
Download as PDF
22540
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 82
Thursday, April 29, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY
5 CFR Parts 2425 and 2429
Review of Arbitration Awards;
Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations
Authority.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Chairman and Members
of the Federal Labor Relations Authority
(the Authority) seek public comment on
proposed revisions to its regulations
concerning review of arbitration awards
and the Authority’s miscellaneous and
general requirements to the extent that
they set forth procedural rules that
apply to the review of arbitration
awards. The purpose of the proposed
revisions is to improve and expedite
review of such awards.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: E-mail written comments to
engagetheflra@flra.gov, or deliver
written comments to the Chief, Case
Intake and Publication Office, Federal
Labor Relations Authority, Suite 200,
1400 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20424–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Whittle Spooner, Counsel for
Regulatory and External Affairs, (202)
218–7791.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Chairman and Members of the Authority
established an internal workgroup to
study and evaluate the policies and
procedures in effect concerning the
review of arbitration awards. In order to
solicit the input of arbitrators and
practitioners, the workgroup held
several focus groups, specifically: One
focus group in Washington, DC with
arbitrators; two focus groups in
Washington, DC with practitioners; and
focus groups in Chicago, Illinois and
Oakland, California with both
arbitrators and practitioners. In
addition, through a survey, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
Authority solicited input from parties to
recent Authority decisions; the
Authority also solicited general input
through engagetheflra@flra.gov.
The proposed revisions are intended
to improve and expedite the review of
arbitration awards. The proposed
revisions include:
• Changing the Authority’s existing
practice for calculating the date for
filing timely exceptions, so that the
thirty-day period begins on the day
after, not the day of, service of the
arbitration award;
• Clarifying how the date of service of
an arbitrator’s award is determined;
• Clarifying the information and
documents that must be filed with
exceptions and oppositions;
• Clarifying existing grounds for
review of an arbitration award and the
consequence of failing to raise an
existing ground;
• Adding an option to request an
expedited decision from the Authority
in certain arbitration cases that do not
involve unfair labor practices;
• Adding an option to request
voluntary alternative dispute resolution
services;
• Providing various methods of
resolving unclear disputes or records;
and
• Clarifying the issues that must be
raised before an arbitrator in order to be
considered by the Authority.
The Authority reproduces proposed 5
CFR part 2425 in its entirety, and
amends 5 CFR 2429.5, 2429.21 and
2429.22. Sectional analyses of the
proposed regulations are as follows.
Part 2425—Review of Arbitration
Awards
Section 2425.1. Establishes October 1,
2010, as the effective date of the revised
regulations.
Section 2425.2. Establishes who may
file exceptions, the time limits for filing
exceptions, and rules for determining
the date of service of the arbitration
award. It also refers to the procedural
and other requirements for filing
exceptions that are set forth in 5 CFR
part 2429.
Section 2425.3. Establishes who may
file an opposition to arbitration
exceptions, as well as the time limits for
filing an opposition. It also refers to the
procedural and other requirements for
filing an opposition that are set forth in
5 CFR part 2429.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 2425.4. Specifies the
information and documentation to be
filed with exceptions, and provides for
the optional use of an Authorityprovided form.
Section 2425.5. Specifies the
information and documentation to be
filed with oppositions to exceptions,
and provides for the optional use of an
Authority-provided form.
Section 2425.6. Establishes grounds
on which the Authority may review an
arbitration award, including the privatesector grounds that the Authority
currently recognizes as well as a
statement that a party may raise
additional private-sector grounds if
those grounds are supported.
• Lists the types of arbitration awards
over which the Authority lacks
jurisdiction.
• Provides for dismissal of exceptions
that fail to raise and support an
established ground or involve an award
over which the Authority lacks
jurisdiction.
Section 2425.7. Permits parties to
jointly request an expedited, short-form
Authority decision in arbitration matters
that do not involve unfair labor
practices.
Section 2425.8. Permits parties to
jointly request assistance from the
Authority’s Collaboration and
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
Section 2425.9. Provides that, when
necessary, the Authority may, among
other things, direct parties to provide
documentary evidence, respond to
requests for further information, or meet
with the Authority or its
representative(s).
Section 2425.10. Renumbers current
§ 2425.4.
Part 2429—Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
Amends three existing sections of part
2429, specifically:
• § 2429.5 to clarify the types of
matters that parties are required to raise
in proceedings before the Regional
Director, Hearing Officer,
Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator;
• § 2429.21 to delete the reference to
exceptions to arbitration awards being
exempt from the general rules regarding
calculating filing periods; and
• § 2429.22 to specify that the rules
set forth in that section are subject to the
rules established in proposed new rule
§ 2425.2.
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules
1. Revise part 2425 to read as follows:
Executive Order 12866
The Authority is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O.
12866.
PART 2425—REVIEW OF
ARBITRATION AWARDS
Executive Order 13132
The Authority is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O.
13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Chairman of the Authority
has determined that this regulation, as
amended, will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, because this rule applies only
to Federal employees, Federal agencies,
and labor organizations representing
Federal employees.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule change will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no
additional information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 2425 and
2429
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Labor management relations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Authority proposes to
amend 5 CFR chapter XIV as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
Sec.
2425.1 Applicability of this part.
2425.2 Exceptions—who may file; time
limits for filing, including determining
date of service of arbitration award for
the purpose of calculating time limits;
procedural and other requirements for
filing.
2425.3 Oppositions—who may file; time
limits for filing; procedural and other
requirements for filing.
2425.4 Content and format of exceptions.
2425.5 Content and format of opposition.
2425.6 Grounds for review; potential
dismissal for failure to raise grounds.
2425.7 Requests for expedited, short-form
decisions in certain arbitration matters
that do not involve unfair labor
practices.
2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative
Dispute Resolution Program.
2425.9 Means of clarifying records or
disputes.
2425.10 Authority decision.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134.
§ 2425.1
Applicability of this part.
This part is applicable to all
arbitration cases in which exceptions
are filed with the Authority, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 7122, on or after October 1,
2010.
§ 2425.2 Exceptions—who may file; time
limits for filing, including determining date
of service of arbitration award for the
purpose of calculating time limits;
procedural and other requirements for
filing.
(a) Who may file. Either party to
arbitration under the provisions of
chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States
Code may file an exception to an
arbitrator’s award rendered pursuant to
the arbitration.
(b) Timeliness requirements—general.
The time limit for filing an exception to
an arbitration award is thirty (30) days.
This thirty (30)-day time limit may not
be extended or waived. In computing
the thirty (30)-day period, the first day
counted is the day after, not the day of,
service of the arbitration award.
Example: If an award is served on May
1, then May 2 is counted as day 1, and
May 31 is day 30; an exception filed on
May 31 would be timely, and an
exception filed on June 1 would be
untimely. In order to determine the date
of service of the award, see the rules set
forth in paragraph (c) of this section,
and for additional rules regarding
computing the filing date, see 5 CFR
2429.21 and 2429.22.
(c) Methods of service of arbitration
award; determining date of service of
arbitration award for purposes of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22541
calculating time limits for exceptions. If
the parties have reached an agreement
as to what is an appropriate method(s)
of service of the arbitration award, then
that agreement—whether expressed in a
collective bargaining agreement or
otherwise—is controlling for purposes
of calculating the time limit for filing
exceptions. If the parties have not
reached such an agreement, then the
arbitrator may use any commonly used
method—including, but not limited to,
electronic mail (hereinafter ‘‘e-mail’’),
facsimile transmission (hereinafter
‘‘fax’’), regular mail, commercial
delivery, or personal delivery—and the
arbitrator’s selected method is
controlling for purposes of calculating
the time limit for filing exceptions. The
following rules apply to determine the
date of service for purposes of
calculating the time limits for filing
exceptions, and assume that the
method(s) of service discussed are either
consistent with the parties’ agreement or
chosen by the arbitrator absent such an
agreement:
(1) If the award is served by regular
mail, then the date of service is the
postmark date, and the excepting party
will receive an additional five days for
filing the exceptions under 5 CFR
2492.22.
(2) If the award is served by
commercial delivery, then the date of
service is the date on which the award
was deposited with the commercial
delivery service, and the excepting party
will receive an additional five days for
filing the exceptions under 5 CFR
2429.22.
(3) If the award is served by e-mail or
fax, then the date of service is the date
of transmission, and the excepting party
will not receive an additional five days
for filing the exceptions.
(4) If the award is served by personal
delivery, then the date of personal
delivery is the date of service, and the
excepting party will not receive an
additional five days for filing the
exceptions.
(5) If the award is served by more than
one method, then the first method of
service is controlling when determining
the date of service for purposes of
calculating the time limits for filing
exceptions. However, if the award is
served by e-mail, fax, or personal
delivery on one day, and by mail or
commercial delivery on the same day,
the excepting party will not receive an
additional five days for filing the
exceptions, even if the award was
postmarked or deposited with the
commercial delivery service before the
e-mail or fax was transmitted.
(d) Procedural and other requirements
for filing. Exceptions must comply with
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
22542
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the requirements set forth in 5 CFR
2429.24 (Place and method of filing;
acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of
copies and paper size), 2429.27 (Service;
statement of service), and 2429.29
(Content of filings).
§ 2425.3 Oppositions—who may file; time
limits for filing; procedural and other
requirements for filing.
(a) Who may file. Any party to
arbitration under the provisions of
chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States
Code may file an opposition to an
exception that has been filed under
§ 2425.2 of this part.
(b) Timeliness requirements. Any
opposition must be filed within thirty
(30) days after the date the exception is
served on the opposing party. For
additional rules regarding computing
the filing date, see 5 CFR 2425.8,
2429.21, and 2429.22.
(c) Procedural requirements.
Oppositions must comply with the
requirements set forth in 5 CFR 2429.24
(Place and method of filing;
acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of
copies and paper size), 2429.27 (Service;
statement of service), and 2429.29
(Content of filings).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2425.4
Content and format of exceptions.
(a) What is required. An exception
must be dated, self-contained, and set
forth in full:
(1) A statement of the grounds on
which review is requested, as discussed
in § 2425.6 of this part;
(2) Arguments in support of the stated
grounds, including specific references to
the record, citations of authorities, and
any other relevant documentation;
(3) Legible copies of any documents
referenced in the arguments discussed
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section;
(4) A legible copy of the award of the
arbitrator; and
(5) The arbitrator’s name, mailing
address, and, if available and authorized
for use by the arbitrator, the arbitrator’s
e-mail address or facsimile number.
(b) What is not required.
Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, exceptions are not required to
include actual copies of documents that
are readily accessible to the Authority,
such as Authority decisions, decisions
of Federal courts, current provisions of
the United States Code, and current
provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
(c) What is prohibited. Consistent
with 5 CFR 2429.5, an exception may
not rely on any material evidence,
factual assertions, arguments (including
affirmative defenses), requested
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
remedies, or challenges to an awarded
remedy that could have been, but were
not, presented to the arbitrator.
(d) Format. The exception may be
filed on an optional form provided by
the Authority, or in any other format
that is consistent with paragraphs (a)
and (c) of this section. A party’s failure
to use, or properly fill out, an Authorityprovided form will not, by itself,
provide a basis for dismissing an
exception.
§ 2425.5
Content and format of opposition.
If a party chooses to file an
opposition, then the party should
address any assertions from the
exceptions that the opposing party
disputes, including any assertions that
any material evidence, factual
assertions, arguments (including
affirmative defenses), requested
remedies, or challenges to an awarded
remedy were raised before the arbitrator.
The party filing the opposition must
provide copies of any documents upon
which it relies unless the documents
were provided with the exceptions. The
opposition may be filed on an optional
form provided by the Authority, or in
any other format that is consistent with
this section. A party’s failure to use, or
properly fill out, an Authority-provided
form will not, by itself, provide a basis
for dismissing an opposition.
§ 2425.6 Grounds for review; potential
dismissal for failure to raise grounds.
(a) The Authority will review an
arbitrator’s award to which an exception
has been filed to determine whether the
award is deficient—
(1) Because it is contrary to any law,
rule or regulation; or
(2) On other grounds similar to those
applied by Federal courts in private
sector labor-management relations.
(b) If a party argues that an award is
deficient on private-sector grounds
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
then the excepting party must explain
how, under standards set forth in the
decisional law of the Authority or
Federal courts:
(1) The arbitrator:
(i) Exceeded his or her authority; or
(ii) Was biased; or
(iii) Denied the excepting party a fair
hearing; or
(2) The award:
(i) Fails to draw its essence from the
parties’ collective bargaining agreement;
or
(ii) Is based on a nonfact; or
(iii) Is incomplete, ambiguous, or
contradictory; or
(iv) Is contrary to public policy; or
(v) Is deficient on the basis of a
private-sector ground not listed in
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
(c) If a party argues that the award is
deficient on a private-sector ground
raised under paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this
section, the party must provide
sufficient citation to legal authority that
establishes the grounds upon which the
party filed its exceptions.
(d) The Authority does not have
jurisdiction over an award relating to:
(1) An action based on unacceptable
performance covered under 5 U.S.C.
4303;
(2) A removal, suspension for more
than fourteen (14) days, reduction in
grade, reduction in pay, or furlough of
thirty (30) days or less covered under 5
U.S.C. 7512; or
(3) Matters similar to those covered
under 5 U.S.C. 4303 and 5 U.S.C. 7512
which arise under other personnel
systems.
(e) An exception may be subject to
dismissal if:
(1) The excepting party fails to raise
and support a ground as required in
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
section, or otherwise fails to
demonstrate a legally recognized basis
for setting aside the award; or
(2) The exception concerns an award
described in paragraph (d) of this
section.
§ 2425.7 Requests for expedited, shortform decisions in certain arbitration matters
that do not involve unfair labor practices.
Where an arbitration matter before the
Authority does not involve allegations
of unfair labor practices under 5 U.S.C.
7116, and the parties wish to receive an
expedited Authority decision, the
parties may jointly request the
Authority to issue a decision
(hereinafter a ‘‘short-form decision’’) that
briefly resolves the parties’ arguments
without a full explanation of the
background, arbitration award, parties’
arguments, and analysis of those
arguments. Such request must be signed
by the designated representative of each
party and filed by either party with the
Authority within thirty (30) days after
the exception is filed. In determining
whether a short-form decision is
appropriate, the Authority will consider
all of the circumstances of the case,
including, but not limited to, its
complexity, potential for precedential
value, and similarity to other, fully
detailed decisions involving the same or
similar issues. Even absent the parties’
joint request, the Authority may issue
short-form decisions in appropriate
cases.
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative
Dispute Resolution Program.
The parties may request assistance
from the Collaboration and Alternative
Dispute Resolution Program (CADR) to
attempt to resolve the dispute before or
after an opposition is filed. Upon
request, and as agreed to by the parties,
CADR representatives will attempt to
assist the parties to resolve these
disputes. If the parties have agreed to
CADR assistance, and the time for filing
an opposition has not expired, then the
Authority will toll the time limit for
filing an opposition until the CADR
process is completed. Parties seeking
information or assistance under this part
may call or write the CADR Office at
1400 K Street NW., Washington, DC,
20424. A brief summary of CADR
activities is available on the Internet at
https://www.flra.gov.
§ 2425.9 Means of clarifying records or
disputes.
When required to clarify a record or
when it would otherwise aid in
disposition of the matter, the Authority,
or its designated representative, may, as
appropriate:
(a) Direct the parties to provide
specific documentary evidence,
including the arbitration record as
discussed in 5 CFR 2429.3;
(b) Direct the parties to respond to
requests for further information;
(c) Meet with parties, either in person
or via telephone or other electronic
communications systems, to attempt to
clarify the dispute or matters in the
record;
(d) Direct the parties to provide oral
argument; or
(e) Take any other appropriate action.
§ 2425.10
Authority decision.
The Authority shall issue its decision
and order taking such action and
making such recommendations
concerning the award as it considers
necessary, consistent with applicable
laws, rules, or regulations.
PART 2429—MISCELLANEOUS AND
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2. The authority citation for part 2429
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; § 2429.18 also
issued under 28 U.S.C. 2122(a).
3. Revise § 2429.5 to read as follows:
§ 2429.5 Matters not previously presented;
official notice.
The Authority will not consider any
material evidence, factual assertions,
arguments (including affirmative
defenses), requested remedies, or
challenges to an awarded remedy that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
22543
could have been, but were not,
presented in the proceedings before the
Regional Director, Hearing Officer,
Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator.
The Authority may, however, take
official notice of such matters as would
be proper.
4. In § 2429.21, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 2429.21
papers.
Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft
Industries a.s. Model L 23 Super Blanik
Gliders
Computation of time for filing
(a) In computing any period of time
prescribed by or allowed by this
subchapter, except in agreement bar
situations described in § 2422.12(c), (d),
(e), and (f) of this subchapter, the day of
the act, event, or default from or after
which the designated period of time
begins to run shall not be included. The
last day of the period so computed is to
be included unless it is a Saturday,
Sunday, or a Federal legal holiday in
which event the period shall run until
the end of the next day which is neither
a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal
holiday. Provided, however, in
agreement bar situations described in
§ 2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f), if the 60th
day prior to the expiration date of an
agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday,
or a Federal legal holiday, a petition, to
be timely, must be filed by the close of
business on the last official workday
preceding the 60th day. When the
period of time prescribed or allowed is
7 days or less, intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal legal holidays
shall be excluded from the
computations.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Revise § 2429.22 to read as follows:
§ 2429.22 Additional time after service by
mail or commercial delivery.
Except as to the filing of an
application for review of a Regional
Director’s Decision and Order under
§ 2422.31 of this subchapter, and subject
to the rules set forth in § 2425.2 of this
subchapter, whenever a party has the
right or is required to do some act
pursuant to this subchapter within a
prescribed period after service of a
notice or other paper upon such party,
and the notice or paper is served on
such party by mail or commercial
delivery, 5 days shall be added to the
proscribed period: Provided, however,
that 5 days shall not be added in any
instance where an extension of time has
been granted.
[FR Doc. 2010–9996 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0457; Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–019–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
Cracks on the stabilizer elevator inner
´
hinges of seven L 23 SUPERBLANIK
sailplanes have been detected during an
inspection.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in no longer retaining the elevator in
place and in jamming of the Pilot´s elevator
control system, and subsequent loss of
elevator control.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
Dated: April 26, 2010.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
BILLING CODE 6727–01–P
Federal Aviation Administration
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22540-22543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9996]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 22540]]
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
5 CFR Parts 2425 and 2429
Review of Arbitration Awards; Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Chairman and Members of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (the Authority) seek public comment on proposed revisions to
its regulations concerning review of arbitration awards and the
Authority's miscellaneous and general requirements to the extent that
they set forth procedural rules that apply to the review of arbitration
awards. The purpose of the proposed revisions is to improve and
expedite review of such awards.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: E-mail written comments to engagetheflra@flra.gov, or
deliver written comments to the Chief, Case Intake and Publication
Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Suite 200, 1400 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20424-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Whittle Spooner, Counsel for
Regulatory and External Affairs, (202) 218-7791.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chairman and Members of the Authority
established an internal workgroup to study and evaluate the policies
and procedures in effect concerning the review of arbitration awards.
In order to solicit the input of arbitrators and practitioners, the
workgroup held several focus groups, specifically: One focus group in
Washington, DC with arbitrators; two focus groups in Washington, DC
with practitioners; and focus groups in Chicago, Illinois and Oakland,
California with both arbitrators and practitioners. In addition,
through a survey, the Authority solicited input from parties to recent
Authority decisions; the Authority also solicited general input through
engagetheflra@flra.gov.
The proposed revisions are intended to improve and expedite the
review of arbitration awards. The proposed revisions include:
Changing the Authority's existing practice for calculating
the date for filing timely exceptions, so that the thirty-day period
begins on the day after, not the day of, service of the arbitration
award;
Clarifying how the date of service of an arbitrator's
award is determined;
Clarifying the information and documents that must be
filed with exceptions and oppositions;
Clarifying existing grounds for review of an arbitration
award and the consequence of failing to raise an existing ground;
Adding an option to request an expedited decision from the
Authority in certain arbitration cases that do not involve unfair labor
practices;
Adding an option to request voluntary alternative dispute
resolution services;
Providing various methods of resolving unclear disputes or
records; and
Clarifying the issues that must be raised before an
arbitrator in order to be considered by the Authority.
The Authority reproduces proposed 5 CFR part 2425 in its entirety,
and amends 5 CFR 2429.5, 2429.21 and 2429.22. Sectional analyses of the
proposed regulations are as follows.
Part 2425--Review of Arbitration Awards
Section 2425.1. Establishes October 1, 2010, as the effective date
of the revised regulations.
Section 2425.2. Establishes who may file exceptions, the time
limits for filing exceptions, and rules for determining the date of
service of the arbitration award. It also refers to the procedural and
other requirements for filing exceptions that are set forth in 5 CFR
part 2429.
Section 2425.3. Establishes who may file an opposition to
arbitration exceptions, as well as the time limits for filing an
opposition. It also refers to the procedural and other requirements for
filing an opposition that are set forth in 5 CFR part 2429.
Section 2425.4. Specifies the information and documentation to be
filed with exceptions, and provides for the optional use of an
Authority-provided form.
Section 2425.5. Specifies the information and documentation to be
filed with oppositions to exceptions, and provides for the optional use
of an Authority-provided form.
Section 2425.6. Establishes grounds on which the Authority may
review an arbitration award, including the private-sector grounds that
the Authority currently recognizes as well as a statement that a party
may raise additional private-sector grounds if those grounds are
supported.
Lists the types of arbitration awards over which the
Authority lacks jurisdiction.
Provides for dismissal of exceptions that fail to raise
and support an established ground or involve an award over which the
Authority lacks jurisdiction.
Section 2425.7. Permits parties to jointly request an expedited,
short-form Authority decision in arbitration matters that do not
involve unfair labor practices.
Section 2425.8. Permits parties to jointly request assistance from
the Authority's Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Program.
Section 2425.9. Provides that, when necessary, the Authority may,
among other things, direct parties to provide documentary evidence,
respond to requests for further information, or meet with the Authority
or its representative(s).
Section 2425.10. Renumbers current Sec. 2425.4.
Part 2429--Miscellaneous and General Requirements
Amends three existing sections of part 2429, specifically:
Sec. 2429.5 to clarify the types of matters that parties
are required to raise in proceedings before the Regional Director,
Hearing Officer, Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator;
Sec. 2429.21 to delete the reference to exceptions to
arbitration awards being exempt from the general rules regarding
calculating filing periods; and
Sec. 2429.22 to specify that the rules set forth in that
section are subject to the rules established in proposed new rule Sec.
2425.2.
[[Page 22541]]
Executive Order 12866
The Authority is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is
not subject to the requirements of E.O. 12866.
Executive Order 13132
The Authority is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is
not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the Chairman of the Authority has determined that this
regulation, as amended, will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, because this rule applies only to
Federal employees, Federal agencies, and labor organizations
representing Federal employees.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule change will not result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no additional information
collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 2425 and 2429
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Labor
management relations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Authority proposes to
amend 5 CFR chapter XIV as follows:
1. Revise part 2425 to read as follows:
PART 2425--REVIEW OF ARBITRATION AWARDS
Sec.
2425.1 Applicability of this part.
2425.2 Exceptions--who may file; time limits for filing, including
determining date of service of arbitration award for the purpose of
calculating time limits; procedural and other requirements for
filing.
2425.3 Oppositions--who may file; time limits for filing; procedural
and other requirements for filing.
2425.4 Content and format of exceptions.
2425.5 Content and format of opposition.
2425.6 Grounds for review; potential dismissal for failure to raise
grounds.
2425.7 Requests for expedited, short-form decisions in certain
arbitration matters that do not involve unfair labor practices.
2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
2425.9 Means of clarifying records or disputes.
2425.10 Authority decision.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134.
Sec. 2425.1 Applicability of this part.
This part is applicable to all arbitration cases in which
exceptions are filed with the Authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122, on
or after October 1, 2010.
Sec. 2425.2 Exceptions--who may file; time limits for filing,
including determining date of service of arbitration award for the
purpose of calculating time limits; procedural and other requirements
for filing.
(a) Who may file. Either party to arbitration under the provisions
of chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code may file an
exception to an arbitrator's award rendered pursuant to the
arbitration.
(b) Timeliness requirements--general. The time limit for filing an
exception to an arbitration award is thirty (30) days. This thirty
(30)-day time limit may not be extended or waived. In computing the
thirty (30)-day period, the first day counted is the day after, not the
day of, service of the arbitration award. Example: If an award is
served on May 1, then May 2 is counted as day 1, and May 31 is day 30;
an exception filed on May 31 would be timely, and an exception filed on
June 1 would be untimely. In order to determine the date of service of
the award, see the rules set forth in paragraph (c) of this section,
and for additional rules regarding computing the filing date, see 5 CFR
2429.21 and 2429.22.
(c) Methods of service of arbitration award; determining date of
service of arbitration award for purposes of calculating time limits
for exceptions. If the parties have reached an agreement as to what is
an appropriate method(s) of service of the arbitration award, then that
agreement--whether expressed in a collective bargaining agreement or
otherwise--is controlling for purposes of calculating the time limit
for filing exceptions. If the parties have not reached such an
agreement, then the arbitrator may use any commonly used method--
including, but not limited to, electronic mail (hereinafter ``e-
mail''), facsimile transmission (hereinafter ``fax''), regular mail,
commercial delivery, or personal delivery--and the arbitrator's
selected method is controlling for purposes of calculating the time
limit for filing exceptions. The following rules apply to determine the
date of service for purposes of calculating the time limits for filing
exceptions, and assume that the method(s) of service discussed are
either consistent with the parties' agreement or chosen by the
arbitrator absent such an agreement:
(1) If the award is served by regular mail, then the date of
service is the postmark date, and the excepting party will receive an
additional five days for filing the exceptions under 5 CFR 2492.22.
(2) If the award is served by commercial delivery, then the date of
service is the date on which the award was deposited with the
commercial delivery service, and the excepting party will receive an
additional five days for filing the exceptions under 5 CFR 2429.22.
(3) If the award is served by e-mail or fax, then the date of
service is the date of transmission, and the excepting party will not
receive an additional five days for filing the exceptions.
(4) If the award is served by personal delivery, then the date of
personal delivery is the date of service, and the excepting party will
not receive an additional five days for filing the exceptions.
(5) If the award is served by more than one method, then the first
method of service is controlling when determining the date of service
for purposes of calculating the time limits for filing exceptions.
However, if the award is served by e-mail, fax, or personal delivery on
one day, and by mail or commercial delivery on the same day, the
excepting party will not receive an additional five days for filing the
exceptions, even if the award was postmarked or deposited with the
commercial delivery service before the e-mail or fax was transmitted.
(d) Procedural and other requirements for filing. Exceptions must
comply with
[[Page 22542]]
the requirements set forth in 5 CFR 2429.24 (Place and method of
filing; acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of copies and paper size),
2429.27 (Service; statement of service), and 2429.29 (Content of
filings).
Sec. 2425.3 Oppositions--who may file; time limits for filing;
procedural and other requirements for filing.
(a) Who may file. Any party to arbitration under the provisions of
chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code may file an opposition
to an exception that has been filed under Sec. 2425.2 of this part.
(b) Timeliness requirements. Any opposition must be filed within
thirty (30) days after the date the exception is served on the opposing
party. For additional rules regarding computing the filing date, see 5
CFR 2425.8, 2429.21, and 2429.22.
(c) Procedural requirements. Oppositions must comply with the
requirements set forth in 5 CFR 2429.24 (Place and method of filing;
acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of copies and paper size), 2429.27
(Service; statement of service), and 2429.29 (Content of filings).
Sec. 2425.4 Content and format of exceptions.
(a) What is required. An exception must be dated, self-contained,
and set forth in full:
(1) A statement of the grounds on which review is requested, as
discussed in Sec. 2425.6 of this part;
(2) Arguments in support of the stated grounds, including specific
references to the record, citations of authorities, and any other
relevant documentation;
(3) Legible copies of any documents referenced in the arguments
discussed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section;
(4) A legible copy of the award of the arbitrator; and
(5) The arbitrator's name, mailing address, and, if available and
authorized for use by the arbitrator, the arbitrator's e-mail address
or facsimile number.
(b) What is not required. Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, exceptions are not required to include actual copies of
documents that are readily accessible to the Authority, such as
Authority decisions, decisions of Federal courts, current provisions of
the United States Code, and current provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
(c) What is prohibited. Consistent with 5 CFR 2429.5, an exception
may not rely on any material evidence, factual assertions, arguments
(including affirmative defenses), requested remedies, or challenges to
an awarded remedy that could have been, but were not, presented to the
arbitrator.
(d) Format. The exception may be filed on an optional form provided
by the Authority, or in any other format that is consistent with
paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section. A party's failure to use, or
properly fill out, an Authority-provided form will not, by itself,
provide a basis for dismissing an exception.
Sec. 2425.5 Content and format of opposition.
If a party chooses to file an opposition, then the party should
address any assertions from the exceptions that the opposing party
disputes, including any assertions that any material evidence, factual
assertions, arguments (including affirmative defenses), requested
remedies, or challenges to an awarded remedy were raised before the
arbitrator. The party filing the opposition must provide copies of any
documents upon which it relies unless the documents were provided with
the exceptions. The opposition may be filed on an optional form
provided by the Authority, or in any other format that is consistent
with this section. A party's failure to use, or properly fill out, an
Authority-provided form will not, by itself, provide a basis for
dismissing an opposition.
Sec. 2425.6 Grounds for review; potential dismissal for failure to
raise grounds.
(a) The Authority will review an arbitrator's award to which an
exception has been filed to determine whether the award is deficient--
(1) Because it is contrary to any law, rule or regulation; or
(2) On other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in
private sector labor-management relations.
(b) If a party argues that an award is deficient on private-sector
grounds under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, then the excepting
party must explain how, under standards set forth in the decisional law
of the Authority or Federal courts:
(1) The arbitrator:
(i) Exceeded his or her authority; or
(ii) Was biased; or
(iii) Denied the excepting party a fair hearing; or
(2) The award:
(i) Fails to draw its essence from the parties' collective
bargaining agreement; or
(ii) Is based on a nonfact; or
(iii) Is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory; or
(iv) Is contrary to public policy; or
(v) Is deficient on the basis of a private-sector ground not listed
in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(c) If a party argues that the award is deficient on a private-
sector ground raised under paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this section, the
party must provide sufficient citation to legal authority that
establishes the grounds upon which the party filed its exceptions.
(d) The Authority does not have jurisdiction over an award relating
to:
(1) An action based on unacceptable performance covered under 5
U.S.C. 4303;
(2) A removal, suspension for more than fourteen (14) days,
reduction in grade, reduction in pay, or furlough of thirty (30) days
or less covered under 5 U.S.C. 7512; or
(3) Matters similar to those covered under 5 U.S.C. 4303 and 5
U.S.C. 7512 which arise under other personnel systems.
(e) An exception may be subject to dismissal if:
(1) The excepting party fails to raise and support a ground as
required in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, or otherwise
fails to demonstrate a legally recognized basis for setting aside the
award; or
(2) The exception concerns an award described in paragraph (d) of
this section.
Sec. 2425.7 Requests for expedited, short-form decisions in certain
arbitration matters that do not involve unfair labor practices.
Where an arbitration matter before the Authority does not involve
allegations of unfair labor practices under 5 U.S.C. 7116, and the
parties wish to receive an expedited Authority decision, the parties
may jointly request the Authority to issue a decision (hereinafter a
``short-form decision'') that briefly resolves the parties' arguments
without a full explanation of the background, arbitration award,
parties' arguments, and analysis of those arguments. Such request must
be signed by the designated representative of each party and filed by
either party with the Authority within thirty (30) days after the
exception is filed. In determining whether a short-form decision is
appropriate, the Authority will consider all of the circumstances of
the case, including, but not limited to, its complexity, potential for
precedential value, and similarity to other, fully detailed decisions
involving the same or similar issues. Even absent the parties' joint
request, the Authority may issue short-form decisions in appropriate
cases.
[[Page 22543]]
Sec. 2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
The parties may request assistance from the Collaboration and
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program (CADR) to attempt to resolve the
dispute before or after an opposition is filed. Upon request, and as
agreed to by the parties, CADR representatives will attempt to assist
the parties to resolve these disputes. If the parties have agreed to
CADR assistance, and the time for filing an opposition has not expired,
then the Authority will toll the time limit for filing an opposition
until the CADR process is completed. Parties seeking information or
assistance under this part may call or write the CADR Office at 1400 K
Street NW., Washington, DC, 20424. A brief summary of CADR activities
is available on the Internet at https://www.flra.gov.
Sec. 2425.9 Means of clarifying records or disputes.
When required to clarify a record or when it would otherwise aid in
disposition of the matter, the Authority, or its designated
representative, may, as appropriate:
(a) Direct the parties to provide specific documentary evidence,
including the arbitration record as discussed in 5 CFR 2429.3;
(b) Direct the parties to respond to requests for further
information;
(c) Meet with parties, either in person or via telephone or other
electronic communications systems, to attempt to clarify the dispute or
matters in the record;
(d) Direct the parties to provide oral argument; or
(e) Take any other appropriate action.
Sec. 2425.10 Authority decision.
The Authority shall issue its decision and order taking such action
and making such recommendations concerning the award as it considers
necessary, consistent with applicable laws, rules, or regulations.
PART 2429--MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2. The authority citation for part 2429 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; Sec. 2429.18 also issued under 28
U.S.C. 2122(a).
3. Revise Sec. 2429.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.5 Matters not previously presented; official notice.
The Authority will not consider any material evidence, factual
assertions, arguments (including affirmative defenses), requested
remedies, or challenges to an awarded remedy that could have been, but
were not, presented in the proceedings before the Regional Director,
Hearing Officer, Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator. The Authority
may, however, take official notice of such matters as would be proper.
4. In Sec. 2429.21, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.21 Computation of time for filing papers.
(a) In computing any period of time prescribed by or allowed by
this subchapter, except in agreement bar situations described in Sec.
2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f) of this subchapter, the day of the act,
event, or default from or after which the designated period of time
begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so
computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a
Federal legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end
of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal
holiday. Provided, however, in agreement bar situations described in
Sec. 2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f), if the 60th day prior to the
expiration date of an agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a
Federal legal holiday, a petition, to be timely, must be filed by the
close of business on the last official workday preceding the 60th day.
When the period of time prescribed or allowed is 7 days or less,
intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be
excluded from the computations.
* * * * *
5. Revise Sec. 2429.22 to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.22 Additional time after service by mail or commercial
delivery.
Except as to the filing of an application for review of a Regional
Director's Decision and Order under Sec. 2422.31 of this subchapter,
and subject to the rules set forth in Sec. 2425.2 of this subchapter,
whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act pursuant
to this subchapter within a prescribed period after service of a notice
or other paper upon such party, and the notice or paper is served on
such party by mail or commercial delivery, 5 days shall be added to the
proscribed period: Provided, however, that 5 days shall not be added in
any instance where an extension of time has been granted.
Dated: April 26, 2010.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010-9996 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727-01-P