Draft 2010 Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations, 22630-22631 [2010-9888]
Download as PDF
22630
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Notices
Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
April 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–9924 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
April 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[FR Doc. 2010–9926 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Vital Signs Minnesota, Inc., Including
Workers Whose Unemployment
Insurance (UI) Wages Are Paid
Through Biomedical Dynamics
Corporation, Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Masterson Personnel
and MRCI Worksource, Burnsville, MN;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on October 1, 2009,
applicable to workers of Vital Signs
Minnesota, Inc., Burnsville, Minnesota.
The notice was published in the Federal
Register on November 17, 2009 (74 FR
59253).
At the request of the State, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of blood pressure cuffs.
New information shows that workers
separated from employment at Vital
Signs Minnesota, Inc. had their wages
reported under a separate
unemployment insurance (UI) tax
account under the name Biomedical
Dynamics Corporation.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to property
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
the subject firm who were adversely
affected by a shift in production of
automation design and build
components.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–71,841 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Vital Signs Minnesota, Inc.,
including workers whose unemployment
insurance (UI) wages are paid through
Biomedical Dynamics Corporation, including
on-site leased workers of Masterson
Personnel and MRCI Workforce, Burnsville,
Minnesota, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after July
16:19 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
All workers of Nautilus, Inc., currently
known as Med-Fit Systems Incorporated,
Commercial Division, Independence,
Virginia, who became totally or partially
separated from who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after July 22, 2008, through December 29,
2011, and all workers in the group threatened
with total or partial separation from
employment on date of certification through
two years from the date of certification, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
April 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–71,841]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
29, 2008, through October 1, 2011, and all
workers in the group threatened with total or
partial separation from employment on date
of certification through two years from the
date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[FR Doc. 2010–9930 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–71,801]
Nautilus, Inc., Currently Known as
Med-Fit Systems Incorporated,
Commercial Division, Including OnSite Workers From Select Staffing,
Independence, VA; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on December 29th, 2009,
applicable to workers of Nautilus, Inc.,
Commercial Division, including on-site
leased workers from Select Staffing,
Independence, Virginia. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 16th, 2010 (75 FR 7032).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers produced cardio and strength
fitness equipment.
New information shows that Nautilus,
Inc. was sold in September 2009 and is
currently known as Med-Fit Systems,
Incorporated. Some workers separated
from employment at the subject firm
had their wages reported under a
separate unemployment insurance (UI)
tax account under the name Med-Fit
Systems, Incorporated.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
the subject firm who were adversely
affected by increased imports of cardio
and strength fitness equipment.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–71,801 is hereby issued as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Draft 2010 Report to Congress on the
Benefits and Costs of Federal
Regulations
AGENCY: Office of Management and
Budget, Executive Office of the
President.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) requests comments
on its Draft 2010 Report to Congress on
the Benefits and Costs of Federal
Regulations, available at: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
inforeg_regpol_reports_congress/. The
Draft Report is divided into four
chapters. Chapter I examines the
benefits and costs of major Federal
regulations issued in fiscal year 2009
and summarizes the benefits and costs
of major regulations issued between
October 1999 and September 2009. It
also discusses regulatory impacts on
State, local, and Tribal governments,
small business, wages, and economic
growth. Chapter II offers
recommendations for regulatory reform.
Chapter III provides an update on
implementation of the Information
Quality Act. Chapter IV summarizes
agency compliance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act.
In this draft Report, OMB offers the
following recommendations:
1. OMB identifies several measures
designed to meet analytical challenges,
principally involving increased
transparency.
2. OMB offers a brief discussion of
disclosure as a regulatory tool.
3. OMB recommends consideration of
certain low-cost approaches to the
problem of childhood obesity.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Notices
4. OMB draws on principles of open
government to invite public suggestions
about improvements in existing
regulations, with particular reference to
economic growth.
These recommendations build on
those of the 2009 Report, in which OMB
emphasized the importance of open
government and in particular of
obtaining access to ‘‘dispersed
knowledge’’ about how to improve
regulation. To promote such
engagement, OMB requests suggestions
about regulatory changes that might
serve to promote economic growth, with
particular reference to increasing
employment, innovation, and
competitiveness. OMB is especially
interested in identifying both new
initiatives and current regulations that
might be modified, expanded, or
repealed in order to promote those
goals. Consistent with Executive Order
12866, OMB welcomes suggestions for
regulatory reforms that have significant
net benefits, that might increase net
exports, and that might promote growth,
innovation, and competitiveness for
small business, perhaps through
increasing flexibility. OMB requests that
nominations be submitted electronically
to OMB within 60 days from the date of
notice publication in the Federal
Register through https://
www.regulations.gov.
DATES: To ensure consideration of
comments as OMB prepares this Draft
Report for submission to Congress,
comments must be in writing and
received by 60 days after publication.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of
the following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Direct
comments to Docket ID OMB–2010–
0008.
• Fax: (202) 395–7285.
• Mail: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Attn: Darcel
D. Gayle, NEOB, Room 10202, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. We
are still experiencing delays in the
regular mail, including first class and
express mail. To ensure that your
comments are received, we recommend
that comments on this draft report be
electronically submitted.
All comments and recommendations
submitted in response to this notice will
be made available to the public,
including by posting them on OMB’s
Web site. For this reason, please do not
include in your comments information
of a confidential nature, such as
sensitive personal information or
proprietary information. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
means OMB will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darcel D. Gayle, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, NEOB, Room
10202, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503. Telephone:
(202) 395–3741.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress
directed the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to prepare an annual
Report to Congress on the Costs and
Benefits of Federal Regulations.
Specifically, Section 624 of the FY 2001
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, also known as the
‘‘Regulatory Right-to-Know Act,’’ (the
Act) requires OMB to submit a report on
the costs and benefits of Federal
regulations together with
recommendation for reform. The Act
states that the report should contain
estimates of the costs and benefits of
regulations in the aggregate, by agency
and agency program, and by major rule,
as well as an analysis of impacts of
Federal regulation on State, local, and
Tribal governments, small businesses,
wages, and economic growth. The Act
also states that the report should be
subject to notice and comment and peer
review.
Cass R. Sunstein,
Administrator, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–9888 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act; Notice of a Matter To Be
Added to the Agenda for Consideration
at an Agency Meeting
TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday,
April 29, 2010.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1b. Consideration of Supervisory
Activities. Closed pursuant to
Exemptions (8) and (9)(A)(ii).
2b. Personnel. Closed pursuant to
Exemption (2).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–10095 Filed 4–27–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22631
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
Notice of Continuance for General
Clearance for Guidelines, Applications,
and Reporting Forms
AGENCY: Institute of Museum and
Library Services.
ACTION: Notice of requests for
information collection, comment
request.
SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum and
Library Service (IMLS) as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Institute of
Museum and Library Services is
currently soliciting comments on IMLS
program guidelines and reporting
requirements.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request can be obtained by
contacting the individual listed below
in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section below on or before
June 26, 2010.
The IMLS is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22630-22631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9888]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Draft 2010 Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of
Federal Regulations
AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the
President.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requests comments on
its Draft 2010 Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal
Regulations, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_regpol_reports_congress/. The Draft Report is divided into four
chapters. Chapter I examines the benefits and costs of major Federal
regulations issued in fiscal year 2009 and summarizes the benefits and
costs of major regulations issued between October 1999 and September
2009. It also discusses regulatory impacts on State, local, and Tribal
governments, small business, wages, and economic growth. Chapter II
offers recommendations for regulatory reform. Chapter III provides an
update on implementation of the Information Quality Act. Chapter IV
summarizes agency compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
In this draft Report, OMB offers the following recommendations:
1. OMB identifies several measures designed to meet analytical
challenges, principally involving increased transparency.
2. OMB offers a brief discussion of disclosure as a regulatory
tool.
3. OMB recommends consideration of certain low-cost approaches to
the problem of childhood obesity.
[[Page 22631]]
4. OMB draws on principles of open government to invite public
suggestions about improvements in existing regulations, with particular
reference to economic growth.
These recommendations build on those of the 2009 Report, in which
OMB emphasized the importance of open government and in particular of
obtaining access to ``dispersed knowledge'' about how to improve
regulation. To promote such engagement, OMB requests suggestions about
regulatory changes that might serve to promote economic growth, with
particular reference to increasing employment, innovation, and
competitiveness. OMB is especially interested in identifying both new
initiatives and current regulations that might be modified, expanded,
or repealed in order to promote those goals. Consistent with Executive
Order 12866, OMB welcomes suggestions for regulatory reforms that have
significant net benefits, that might increase net exports, and that
might promote growth, innovation, and competitiveness for small
business, perhaps through increasing flexibility. OMB requests that
nominations be submitted electronically to OMB within 60 days from the
date of notice publication in the Federal Register through https://www.regulations.gov.
DATES: To ensure consideration of comments as OMB prepares this Draft
Report for submission to Congress, comments must be in writing and
received by 60 days after publication.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Direct comments to Docket ID
OMB-2010-0008.
Fax: (202) 395-7285.
Mail: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Darcel D. Gayle, NEOB, Room 10202, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. We are still experiencing
delays in the regular mail, including first class and express mail. To
ensure that your comments are received, we recommend that comments on
this draft report be electronically submitted.
All comments and recommendations submitted in response to this notice
will be made available to the public, including by posting them on
OMB's Web site. For this reason, please do not include in your comments
information of a confidential nature, such as sensitive personal
information or proprietary information. The https://www.regulations.gov
Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means OMB will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darcel D. Gayle, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, NEOB, Room
10202, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. Telephone: (202)
395-3741.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress directed the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to prepare an annual Report to Congress on the Costs
and Benefits of Federal Regulations. Specifically, Section 624 of the
FY 2001 Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, also known
as the ``Regulatory Right-to-Know Act,'' (the Act) requires OMB to
submit a report on the costs and benefits of Federal regulations
together with recommendation for reform. The Act states that the report
should contain estimates of the costs and benefits of regulations in
the aggregate, by agency and agency program, and by major rule, as well
as an analysis of impacts of Federal regulation on State, local, and
Tribal governments, small businesses, wages, and economic growth. The
Act also states that the report should be subject to notice and comment
and peer review.
Cass R. Sunstein,
Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-9888 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P