Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes, 22503-22506 [2010-9520]
Download as PDF
22503
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 82
Thursday, April 29, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0431; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–072–AD; Amendment
39–16272; AD 2010–09–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model DHC–8–400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
* * * 1. A potential freezing of the AOA
[angle of attack] Vane Resolver * * * may
restrict the dynamic behavior (lag) of the
vane and could lead to a potential seize-up
condition at lower temperatures. This
condition, if not corrected, may provide
inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection
System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane
heating element could degrade to a point
where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice buildup may lead to a change in the aerodynamic
properties of the AOA vane and, under
certain conditions, send inaccurate
information to the SPS. This ageing condition
cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane
heater current monitor.
These conditions, if not corrected, could
result in inaccurate AOA data provided
to the SPS and could lead to a change
in the aerodynamic properties of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
AOA vane and reduced ability of the
flight crew to maintain safe flight and
landing of the airplane. This AD
requires actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May
14, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of May 14, 2010.
We must receive comments on this
AD by June 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Licata, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE–
172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7361; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2010–05,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
dated February 2, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Although there have been no in-service
reported incidents related to AOA [angle of
attack] failures on the DHC–8 Series 400
aeroplanes, two separate issues have been
identified that would affect proper operation
of the AOA vane, P/N [part number]
C16177AC. These issues are:
1. A potential freezing of the AOA Vane
Resolver, which may restrict the dynamic
behavior (lag) of the vane and could lead to
a potential seize-up condition at lower
temperatures. This condition, if not
corrected, may provide inaccurate AOA data
to the Stall Protection System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane
heating element could degrade to a point
where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice buildup may lead to a change in the aerodynamic
properties of the AOA vane and, under
certain conditions, send inaccurate
information to the SPS. This ageing condition
cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane
heater current monitor.
This directive mandates replacement of the
vanes equipped with suspect resolvers and a
periodic inspection of the in-rush current to
verify the AOA vane heating capability.
These conditions, if not corrected, could
result in inaccurate AOA data provided
to the SPS and could lead to a change
in the aerodynamic properties of the
AOA vane and reduced ability of the
flight crew to maintain safe flight and
landing of the airplane. You may obtain
further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Alert Service
Bulletin A84–27–46, dated October 20,
2009; and Alert Service Bulletin A84–
27–51, dated December 22, 2009. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined the unsafe
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
22504
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are highlighted in
a Note within the AD.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because potential freezing of the
vane resolver of the angle of attack
could restrict the dynamic behavior (lag)
of the vane and could lead to a potential
seize-up condition at lower
temperatures. As a result of aging, the
vane heating element of the AOA could
degrade to a point where there is
insufficient heat to prevent ice buildup
on the AOA vanes. These conditions, if
not corrected, could result in inaccurate
AOA data provided to the SPS and
could lead to a change in the
aerodynamic properties of the AOA
vane and reduced ability of the flight
crew to maintain safe flight and landing
of the airplane. Therefore, we
determined that notice and opportunity
for public comment before issuing this
AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments about this AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0431;
Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–072–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–09–07 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment
39–16272. Docket No. FAA–2010–0431;
Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–072–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective May 14, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402
airplanes; certificated in any category, that
are equipped with Thales angle of attack
(AOA) vanes having part number (P/N)
C16177AC.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27: Flight Controls.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Reason
(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness
information (MCAI) states:
Although there have been no in-service
reported incidents related to AOA failures on
the DHC–8 Series 400 aeroplanes, two
separate issues have been identified that
would affect proper operation of the AOA
vane, P/N C16177AC. These issues are:
1. A potential freezing of the AOA Vane
Resolver, which may restrict the dynamic
behavior (lag) of the vane and could lead to
a potential seize-up condition at lower
temperatures. This condition, if not
corrected, may provide inaccurate AOA data
to the Stall Protection System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane
heating element could degrade to a point
where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice buildup may lead to a change in the aerodynamic
properties of the AOA vane and, under
certain conditions, send inaccurate
information to the SPS. This ageing condition
cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane
heater current monitor. This directive
mandates replacement of the vanes equipped
with suspect resolvers and a periodic
inspection of the in-rush current to verify the
AOA vane heating capability.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
These conditions, if not corrected, could
result in inaccurate AOA data provided to
the SPS and could lead to a change in the
aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
reduced ability of the flight crew to maintain
safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 250 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD: Do an inspection to
determine the serial number of the AOA
sensors installed on the airplane, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84–27–51, dated December 22,
2009. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the serial number of the AOA
sensors can be conclusively determined from
that review.
(1) If neither serial number is specified in
paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A84–27–51, dated December
22, 2009, do the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) If the serial numbers of both AOA
sensors are specified in paragraph 1.A., Table
1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84–
27–51, dated December 22, 2009, and both
serial numbers have suffix ‘‘B,’’ do the actions
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(3) If the serial numbers of both AOA
sensors are specified in paragraph 1.A., Table
1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84–
27–51, dated December 22, 2009, do the
actions required by either paragraph (g)(3)(i)
or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, replace the AOA
sensors with new or serviceable sensors, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84–27–51, dated December 22,
2009.
(ii) Before further flight, replace one of the
two AOA sensors with a new or serviceable
sensor, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A84–27–51, dated
December 22, 2009. Replace the remaining
sensor with a new or serviceable sensor
within 750 flight hours after the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(4) If only one of the serial numbers of the
AOA sensors is specified in paragraph 1.A.,
Table 1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
22505
A84–27–51, dated December 22, 2009,
replace that sensor with a new or serviceable
sensor within 750 flight hours after the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(h) At the applicable compliance time
specified in Table 1 of this AD: Measure the
inrush current of the AOA vane, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84–27–46, dated October 20, 2009.
(1) If, during any measurement required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, an AOA vane is
found to have an inrush current less than or
equal to 1.6 amps, before further flight,
replace the vane with a new or serviceable
vane, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A84–27–46, dated
October 20, 2009. Repeat the measurement of
the newly installed vane within 2,000 flight
hours after replacement.
(2) If, during any measurement required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, an AOA vane is
found to have an inrush current greater than
1.6 amps, repeat the measurement of the vane
at the applicable compliance time specified
in Table 2 of this AD.
TABLE 1—INITIAL MEASUREMENT
For any AOA vane that, as of the effective date of this AD, has accumulated—
Do the initial inrush current measurement—
Less than 5,000 total flight hours .............................................................
5,000 or more total flight hours, but less than 6,000 total flight hours ....
Before the AOA vane has accumulated 5,900 total flight hours.
Within 900 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or before the
AOA vane has accumulated 6,500 total flight hours, whichever occurs first.
Within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
6,000 or more total flight hours ................................................................
TABLE 2—REPETITIVE MEASUREMENT INTERVALS
If the last inrush current measurement of the serviceable AOA transducer is—
Then repeat the measurement—
More than 1.60 amps, but less than or equal to 1.70 amps ...................
Within 1,000 flight hours after the last inrush current measurement of
the serviceable AOA transducer.
Within 2,000 flight hours after the last inrush current measurement of
the serviceable AOA transducer.
More than 1.70 amps ...............................................................................
(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, an AOA
sensor having P/N C16177AC with any serial
number specified in paragraph 1.A., Table 1,
of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84–
27–51, dated December 22, 2009, unless the
sensor has been inspected in accordance with
this AD and unless the serial number has a
suffix ‘‘B.’’
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
(1) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–
2010–05, dated February 2, 2010, requires an
inspection to determine the serial number of
the AOA vanes installed on the airplane.
However, for clarification, we are requiring
an inspection to determine the serial number
of the AOA sensors (which are part of the
vane), as specified in Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A84–27–51, dated December
22, 2009.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
(2) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–
2010–05, dated February 2, 2010, states that
an airplane may be dispatched with one
serviceable unit for a maximum of 1,000
flight hours. However, paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of
this AD allows an airplane to be dispatched
with one serviceable unit for a maximum of
750 flight hours. This difference has been
coordinated with Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA).
(3) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–
2010–05, dated February 2, 2010, states that
if only one of the serial numbers of the
affected AOA sensors is found, replace that
sensor with a new or serviceable sensor
within 1,000 flight hours. However,
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD requires
replacement with a new or serviceable sensor
within 750 flight hours. This difference has
been coordinated with TCCA.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
22506
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2010–05, dated February 2,
2010; Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A84–27–46, dated October 20, 2009; and
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84–27–
51, dated December 22, 2009; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
(l) You must use Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84–27–46, dated October 20, 2009;
and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84–
27–51, dated December 22, 2009; as
applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; e-mail
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 15,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9520 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Apr 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration
Discussion
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1111; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–147–AD; Amendment
39–16271; AD 2010–09–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701 & 702), CL–600–2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705), and CL–600–
2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During an elevator Power Control Unit
(PCU) Centering Functional Check on two
CL–600–2C10 aircraft, sustained oscillations
were discovered when a control rod was
disconnected. These sustained oscillations
could render the elevator surface inoperable
and cause subsequent loss of pitch control of
the aircraft.
*
*
*
*
*
Loss of pitch control could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
3, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Alfano, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical
Systems Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7340; fax (516) 794–5531.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 3, 2009 (74 FR
63331). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During an elevator Power Control Unit
(PCU) Centering Functional Check on two
CL–600–2C10 aircraft, sustained oscillations
were discovered when a control rod was
disconnected. These sustained oscillations
could render the elevator surface inoperable
and cause subsequent loss of pitch control of
the aircraft.
This directive mandates incorporation of a
new centering mechanism on the elevator
torque tube to prevent these sustained
oscillations.
Loss of pitch control could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
Request To Include Revised Service
Information
Comair, Inc., asks that we allow the
use of Revision C instead of Revision B
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–
27–042 for accomplishing the actions
specified in paragraph (f)(1) of the
NPRM. Comair, Inc., states that
Bombardier has issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–27–042,
Revision C, dated December 10, 2009.
We referred to Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA–27–042, Revision B,
dated June 2, 2009, in paragraph (f)(1)
of the NPRM as the appropriate source
of service information for accomplishing
the specified actions.
We agree with the commenter.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–27–
042, Revision C, dated December 10,
2009, makes minor updates and
editorial changes; no additional work is
necessary on airplanes modified in
accordance with Revision B. Therefore,
we have revised paragraph (f)(1) of this
final rule to refer to Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA–27–042, Revision C,
dated December 10, 2009, for
accomplishing the specified actions. We
have also revised paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD to give credit for actions done in
accordance with Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA–27–042, Revision B,
dated June 2, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22503-22506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9520]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 22503]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0431; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-072-AD;
Amendment 39-16272; AD 2010-09-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
* * * 1. A potential freezing of the AOA [angle of attack] Vane
Resolver * * * may restrict the dynamic behavior (lag) of the vane
and could lead to a potential seize-up condition at lower
temperatures. This condition, if not corrected, may provide
inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane heating element could
degrade to a point where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice build-up may lead to a change in
the aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and, under certain
conditions, send inaccurate information to the SPS. This ageing
condition cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane heater current
monitor.
These conditions, if not corrected, could result in inaccurate AOA data
provided to the SPS and could lead to a change in the aerodynamic
properties of the AOA vane and reduced ability of the flight crew to
maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. This AD requires
actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 14, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of May 14, 2010.
We must receive comments on this AD by June 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Licata, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7361; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2010-05, dated February 2, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
Although there have been no in-service reported incidents
related to AOA [angle of attack] failures on the DHC-8 Series 400
aeroplanes, two separate issues have been identified that would
affect proper operation of the AOA vane, P/N [part number] C16177AC.
These issues are:
1. A potential freezing of the AOA Vane Resolver, which may
restrict the dynamic behavior (lag) of the vane and could lead to a
potential seize-up condition at lower temperatures. This condition,
if not corrected, may provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall
Protection System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane heating element could
degrade to a point where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice build-up may lead to a change in
the aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and, under certain
conditions, send inaccurate information to the SPS. This ageing
condition cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane heater current
monitor.
This directive mandates replacement of the vanes equipped with
suspect resolvers and a periodic inspection of the in-rush current
to verify the AOA vane heating capability.
These conditions, if not corrected, could result in inaccurate AOA data
provided to the SPS and could lead to a change in the aerodynamic
properties of the AOA vane and reduced ability of the flight crew to
maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-46, dated
October 20, 2009; and Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated December
22, 2009. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe
[[Page 22504]]
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.
Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
potential freezing of the vane resolver of the angle of attack could
restrict the dynamic behavior (lag) of the vane and could lead to a
potential seize-up condition at lower temperatures. As a result of
aging, the vane heating element of the AOA could degrade to a point
where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice buildup on the AOA
vanes. These conditions, if not corrected, could result in inaccurate
AOA data provided to the SPS and could lead to a change in the
aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and reduced ability of the
flight crew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment
before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0431; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NM-072-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-09-07 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16272. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0431; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-072-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 14,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401,
and -402 airplanes; certificated in any category, that are equipped
with Thales angle of attack (AOA) vanes having part number (P/N)
C16177AC.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Although there have been no in-service reported incidents
related to AOA failures on the DHC-8 Series 400 aeroplanes, two
separate issues have been identified that would affect proper
operation of the AOA vane, P/N C16177AC. These issues are:
1. A potential freezing of the AOA Vane Resolver, which may
restrict the dynamic behavior (lag) of the vane and could lead to a
potential seize-up condition at lower temperatures. This condition,
if not corrected, may provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall
Protection System (SPS).
2. As a result of ageing, the AOA vane heating element could
degrade to a point where there is insufficient heat to prevent ice
build-up on the AOA vanes. The ice build-up may lead to a change in
the aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and, under certain
conditions, send inaccurate information to the SPS. This ageing
condition cannot be detected by the aircraft AOA vane heater current
monitor. This directive mandates replacement of the vanes equipped
with suspect resolvers and a periodic inspection of the in-rush
current to verify the AOA vane heating capability.
These conditions, if not corrected, could result in inaccurate AOA
data provided to the SPS and could lead to a change in the
aerodynamic properties of the AOA vane and
[[Page 22505]]
reduced ability of the flight crew to maintain safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 250 flight hours after the effective date of this AD:
Do an inspection to determine the serial number of the AOA sensors
installed on the airplane, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated
December 22, 2009. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the serial number of the
AOA sensors can be conclusively determined from that review.
(1) If neither serial number is specified in paragraph 1.A.,
Table 1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated
December 22, 2009, do the actions required by paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(2) If the serial numbers of both AOA sensors are specified in
paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-
27-51, dated December 22, 2009, and both serial numbers have suffix
``B,'' do the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(3) If the serial numbers of both AOA sensors are specified in
paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-
27-51, dated December 22, 2009, do the actions required by either
paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, replace the AOA sensors with new or
serviceable sensors, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated
December 22, 2009.
(ii) Before further flight, replace one of the two AOA sensors
with a new or serviceable sensor, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A84-27-51, dated December 22, 2009. Replace the remaining sensor
with a new or serviceable sensor within 750 flight hours after the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(4) If only one of the serial numbers of the AOA sensors is
specified in paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84-27-51, dated December 22, 2009, replace that sensor
with a new or serviceable sensor within 750 flight hours after the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(h) At the applicable compliance time specified in Table 1 of
this AD: Measure the inrush current of the AOA vane, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A84-27-46, dated October 20, 2009.
(1) If, during any measurement required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, an AOA vane is found to have an inrush current less than or
equal to 1.6 amps, before further flight, replace the vane with a
new or serviceable vane, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-46, dated
October 20, 2009. Repeat the measurement of the newly installed vane
within 2,000 flight hours after replacement.
(2) If, during any measurement required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, an AOA vane is found to have an inrush current greater than 1.6
amps, repeat the measurement of the vane at the applicable
compliance time specified in Table 2 of this AD.
Table 1--Initial Measurement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For any AOA vane that, as of the
effective date of this AD, has Do the initial inrush current
accumulated-- measurement--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 5,000 total flight hours..... Before the AOA vane has
accumulated 5,900 total flight
hours.
5,000 or more total flight hours, but Within 900 flight hours after
less than 6,000 total flight hours. the effective date of this AD,
or before the AOA vane has
accumulated 6,500 total flight
hours, whichever occurs first.
6,000 or more total flight hours....... Within 500 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Repetitive Measurement Intervals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the last inrush current measurement
of the serviceable AOA transducer is-- Then repeat the measurement--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than 1.60 amps, but less than or Within 1,000 flight hours after
equal to 1.70 amps. the last inrush current
measurement of the serviceable
AOA transducer.
More than 1.70 amps.................... Within 2,000 flight hours after
the last inrush current
measurement of the serviceable
AOA transducer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, an AOA sensor having P/N C16177AC with any serial
number specified in paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated December 22, 2009, unless the
sensor has been inspected in accordance with this AD and unless the
serial number has a suffix ``B.''
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows:
(1) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-05, dated February
2, 2010, requires an inspection to determine the serial number of
the AOA vanes installed on the airplane. However, for clarification,
we are requiring an inspection to determine the serial number of the
AOA sensors (which are part of the vane), as specified in Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-51, dated December 22, 2009.
(2) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-05, dated February
2, 2010, states that an airplane may be dispatched with one
serviceable unit for a maximum of 1,000 flight hours. However,
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of this AD allows an airplane to be dispatched
with one serviceable unit for a maximum of 750 flight hours. This
difference has been coordinated with Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA).
(3) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-05, dated February
2, 2010, states that if only one of the serial numbers of the
affected AOA sensors is found, replace that sensor with a new or
serviceable sensor within 1,000 flight hours. However, paragraph
(g)(4) of this AD requires replacement with a new or serviceable
sensor within 750 flight hours. This difference has been coordinated
with TCCA.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300;
fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or
lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from
[[Page 22506]]
a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-
approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are
approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before
it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-05,
dated February 2, 2010; Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-46,
dated October 20, 2009; and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-
27-51, dated December 22, 2009; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-27-46,
dated October 20, 2009; and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A84-
27-51, dated December 22, 2009; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-9520 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P