Anchorage Regulations; Port of New York, 22323-22330 [2010-9850]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
accordance with the per-page amount
established in OSHRC’s fee schedule.
See Appendix A to this part. For other
forms of duplication, direct costs of
producing the copy, including operator
time, shall be calculated and assessed.
Copying fees shall not be charged for the
first 100 pages of copies unless the
copies are requested for a commercial
use. No copying fee shall be charged for
educational, scientific, or news media
requests if the agency fails to comply
with any time limit in § 2201.6,
provided that no unusual or exceptional
circumstances (as those terms are
defined in § 2201.6(b) and § 2201.4(e),
respectively) apply to the processing of
the request.
(2) Search fee. Search fees shall be
calculated in accordance with the
amounts established in OSHRC’s fee
schedule. See Appendix A to this part.
Commercial requesters shall be charged
for all search time, except as described
below. Search fees shall be charged even
if the responsive documents are not
located or if they are located but
withheld on the basis of an exemption.
However, search fees shall be limited or
not charged as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Failure to comply with time limits.
No search fee shall be charged if the
agency fails to comply with any time
limit in § 2201.6, provided that no
unusual or exceptional circumstances
(as those terms are defined in
§ 2201.6(b) and § 2201.4(e), respectively)
apply to the processing of the request.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Fees likely to exceed $25. If the
total fee charges are likely to exceed
$25, the FOIA Disclosure Officer shall
notify the requester of the estimated
amount of the charges, unless the
requester has indicated a willingness to
pay fees up to the estimated amount.
The notification shall offer the requester
an opportunity to confer with the FOIA
Disclosure Officer to reformulate the
request to meet the requester’s needs at
a lower cost. In cases in which a
requester has been notified that actual
or estimated fees amount to more than
$25, the request shall not be considered
received and further work shall not be
done on it until the requester agrees to
pay the actual or estimated total fee.
Any such agreement shall be
memorialized in writing.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Section 2201.10 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(3), (5), and
(7);
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(8),
(10), and (11) as paragraphs (a)(16)
through (a)(18);
c. Removing paragraph (a)(9); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
d. Adding new paragraphs (a)(8)
through (a)(15).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 2201.10
Maintenance of statistics.
(a) * * *
(3) A complete list of all statutes that
the agency used to authorize the
withholding of information under 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(3), which exempts
information that is specifically
exempted from disclosure by other
statutes and the number of occasions on
which each statute was relied upon;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The number of requests for records
pending before the agency as of
September 30 of the preceding year, and
the median and average number of days
that these requests had been pending
before the agency as of that date;
*
*
*
*
*
(7) The median number of days taken
by the agency to process different types
of requests, based on the date on which
the requests were received by the
agency;
(8) The average number of days for the
agency to respond to a request
beginning on the date on which the
request was received by the agency, the
median number of days for the agency
to respond to such requests, and the
range in number of days for the agency
to respond to such requests;
(9) Based on the number of business
days that have elapsed since each
request was originally received by the
agency—
(i) The number of requests for records
to which the agency has responded with
a determination within a period up to
and including 20 days, and in 20-day
increments up to and including 200
days;
(ii) The number of requests for records
to which the agency has responded with
a determination within a period greater
than 200 days and less than 301 days;
(iii) The number of requests for
records to which the agency has
responded with a determination within
a period greater than 300 days and less
than 401 days; and
(iv) The number of requests for
records to which the agency has
responded with a determination within
a period greater than 400 days;
(10) The average number of days for
the agency to provide the granted
information beginning on the date on
which the request was originally filed,
the median number of days for the
agency to provide the granted
information, and the range in number of
days for the agency to provide the
granted information;
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22323
(11) The median and average number
of days for the agency to respond to
administrative appeals based on the
date on which the appeals originally
were received by the agency, the highest
number of business days taken by the
agency to respond to an administrative
appeal, and the lowest number of
business days taken by the agency to
respond to an administrative appeal;
(12) Data on the 10 active requests
with the earliest filing dates pending at
the agency, including the amount of
time that has elapsed since each request
was originally received by the agency;
(13) Data on the 10 active
administrative appeals with the earliest
filing dates pending before the agency as
of September 30 of the preceding year,
including the number of business days
that have elapsed since the requests
were originally received by the agency;
(14) The number of expedited review
requests that are granted and denied, the
average and median number of days for
adjudicating expedited review requests,
and the number adjudicated within the
required 10 days;
(15) The number of fee waiver
requests that are granted and denied,
and the average and median number of
days for adjudicating fee waiver
determinations;
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–9432 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7600–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG 2008–1082]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Port of New
York
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document supplements
the Coast Guard’s September 2009
proposal to amend Anchorage Ground
No. 19 located east of the EdgewaterWeehawken Federal Channel on the
Hudson River. The revised proposal is
necessary to facilitate safe navigation
and provide safe and secure anchorages
for vessels operating in the area. This
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking amends the NPRM that
incorrectly stated that the current
Edgewater-Weehawken Federal Channel
would be relocated as part of the
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22324
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
proposal to amend Anchorage Ground
No. 19. This SNPRM also cancels two
proposed changes to the Anchorage
Regulation discussed in the NPRM and
provides an additional opportunity for
comment on the proposed changes to
the regulations for Anchorage 19.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2008–1082 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Jeff Yunker,
Coast Guard Sector New York,
Waterways Management Division;
telephone 718–354–4195, e-mail
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–1082),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and click on
the ‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop-down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2008–1082’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ and then click on
the balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. If you submit your comments
by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than
81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying
and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and click on
the ‘‘Read comments’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2008–
1082’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But, you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Hudson River Pilots Association,
through the Port of New York/New
Jersey Harbor Safety, Navigation and
Operations Committee, has requested
that the Coast Guard revise the
boundaries of Anchorage Ground No. 19
which is located on the Hudson River,
east of the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel and south of the
George Washington Bridge.
Due to severe recurring shoaling
within the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel, the Hudson River
Pilots requested and received
authorization from the Coast Guard and
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to
pilot vessels through the deeper and
safer water located within the
boundaries of Anchorage Ground No.
19.
Due to shoaling, the March 2007
ACOE survey verified a controlling
depth of 27 feet in the Right outside
Quarter of the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel where vessels bound
for ports north of New York City would
have to transit. As published by the
ACOE Institute for Water Resources,
vessels with drafts of up to 34 feet
transit the Hudson River. In calendar
year 2006, there were 6,562 transits on
the Hudson River between the mouth of
the Harlem River and Waterford, NY by
vessels with a draft of 27 feet or greater.
Vessels with a draft of 27 feet or greater
would be required to transit through the
deeper water which is within the
current boundaries of Anchorage
Ground No.19.
Tug and barge traffic within the
harbor has increased 37% since 1991.
Anchorage Ground No. 19 is the closest
Anchorage Ground available for use
when there is no space for temporary
anchoring within the Upper New York
Bay Anchorage Grounds. Hence, these
vessels transit to Anchorage Ground No.
19 to await a berth, or orders, to
minimize fuel consumption and provide
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
an orderly flow of commerce within the
harbor and the New England region.
On October 14, 2008, the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port New York issued an
Advisory Notice notifying the maritime
community that in accordance with 33
CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i), vessels would only
be allowed to anchor on the western
boundary of Anchorage Ground No. 19.
This temporary solution was necessary
to facilitate deep draft vessel transit
through the eastern portion of
Anchorage Ground No. 19.
On September 9, 2009, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Anchorage
Regulations; Port of New York and
Vicinity’’ (Docket number USCG–2009–
1082) in the Federal Register (74 FR
47906). The proposal sought to amend
Anchorage Ground No. 19 by dividing it
into two separate anchorages
(Anchorage Ground No. 19 West and
Anchorage Ground No. 19 East), and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
relocating the majority of the anchorage
area to the western side of the Hudson
River. The proposed change would
allow deep draft vessels to transit the
deeper water without having to transit
through Anchorage Ground No. 19.
In that NPRM, it was stated that the
ACOE would relocate the WeehawkenEdgewater Federal Channel to the east
of its current location and the Coast
Guard would relocate Anchorage
Ground No. 19 to the west of its current
location.
Since the publication of the NPRM,
the ACOE has advised the Coast Guard
that it does not intend to seek
Congressional action to de-authorize the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal
Channel. However, the ACOE also
advised that it does not object to the
Coast Guard establishing an Anchorage
Ground in the existing WeehawkenEdgewater Federal Channel.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22325
Consequently, to facilitate safe
navigation of deep draft vessels the
Coast Guard revises its proposal to
disestablish Anchorage Ground No. 19
and establish two separate anchorage
grounds, Anchorage Ground 19 West
and Anchorage Ground No. 19 East.
This would be accomplished by
dividing Anchorage Ground No. 19 into
an east and a west portion and
relocating the majority of the anchorage
area (new Anchorage Ground No. 19
West) from the eastern half of the
Hudson River to the western half closer
to the New Jersey shore (over the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal
Channel). The following graphics
display the current boundary of
Anchorage Ground No. 19 and the
proposed boundaries of Anchorage
Grounds No. 19 East and No. 19 West:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
EP28AP10.019
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
22326
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 9110–04–C
Disestablishing Anchorage Ground
No. 19 and establishing Anchorage
Ground No. 19 East and Anchorage
Ground No. 19 West would create a 400
yard wide area of deeper water between
the newly established anchorage
grounds. This proposed change would
allow deep draft vessels to transit the
deeper water without having to transit
through an anchorage ground.
The Weehawken-Edgewater Federal
Channel is authorized by Congress, and
constructed and maintained by the
ACOE. The ACOE has advised the Coast
Guard that no portion of the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel
will be relocated in conjunction with
the proposed reapportionment,
relocation and establishment of
Anchorage Ground No. 19 into two new
anchorage grounds. The ACOE has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
further advised that establishment of an
anchorage ground in the WeehawkenEdgewater Federal Channel is not
expected to impede navigation or a need
to maintain channel depth because the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel
currently supports no deep draft vessel
traffic.
According to the ACOE the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel
was originally intended to support
commercial vessel operations on the
New Jersey waterfront in the vicinity of
the Channel. However, due to changes
in shoreline usage from industrial to
residential and recreational, the original
intent of the Channel no longer exists.
As a result there has not been a need to
dredge the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel segment to its
authorized depth since it was last
maintenance dredged in 1994.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22327
The ACOE further advised that it does
not appear likely that a need will arise
in the foreseeable future to maintain the
Channel for deep draft vessel traffic
intending to access New Jersey
waterfront and shore facilities.
However, should a need recur in the
future to accommodate deep draft
traffic, the use of the areas as anchorage
grounds would be re-evaluated.
In the interest of safe navigation and
to minimize confusion, the ACOE and
the USCG will request that the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) remove the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel
designation from NOAA charts. In
addition, the Coast Guard will request
chart corrections removing Anchorage
Ground No. 19 boundary line
designation and adding the boundary
lines for the proposed Anchorage
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
EP28AP10.020
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
22328
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Ground No. 19 West and Anchorage
Ground No. 19 East.
Discussion of Revised Proposed Rule
In this rule the Coast Guard proposes
to concurrently disestablish Anchorage
Ground No. 19 and establish Anchorage
Ground No. 19 East and Anchorage
Ground No. 19 West. The following are
the proposed boundaries of the new
Anchorage Grounds:
(1) Anchorage No. 19 East, bound by
the following points: 40°49′42.6″ N,
073°57′14.7″ W; thence to 40°49′45.9″ N,
073°57′22.0″ W; thence to 40°49′52.0″ N,
073°57′22.0″ W; thence to 40°50′08.3″ N,
073°57′10.8″ W; thence to 40°50′55.4″ N,
073°56′59.7″ W; thence to 40°51′02.5″ N,
073°56′57.4″ W; thence to 40°51′00.8″ N,
073°56′49.4″ W; thence along the
shoreline to the point of origin (NAD
83).
(2) Anchorage No. 19 West, would be
bound by the following points:
40°46′56.3″ N, 073°59′42.2″ W; thence to
40°47′36.9″ N, 073°59′11.7″ W; thence to
40°49′31.3″ N, 073°57′43.8″ W; thence to
40°49′40.2″ N, 073°57′37.6″ W; thence to
40°49′52.4″ N, 073°57′37.6″ W; thence to
40°49′57.7″ N, 073°57′47.3″ W; thence to
40°49′32.2″ N, 073°58′12.9″ W; thence to
40°49′00.7″ N, 073°58′33.1″ W; thence to
40°48′28.7″ N, 073°58′53.8″ W; thence to
40°47′38.2″ N, 073°59′31.2″ W; thence to
40°47′02.7″ N, 073°59′57.4″ W; thence to
the point of origin (NAD 83).
Currently, Anchorage Ground No. 19
covers approximately 1,352 acres. The
proposed Anchorage Ground No. 19
West would cover approximately 714.5
acres, and Anchorage Ground No. 19
East would cover 185.5 acres. There
would be a 400-yard-wide space
separating the two Anchorage Grounds.
The depth of the water in the 400 yard
wide space separating the two proposed
Anchorage Grounds is sufficient to
allow deep draft vessels to safely
navigate and transit.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard
proposed to remove the regulation (33
CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i)) requiring all
vessels to obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port (COTP) prior to
anchoring. Based on the expanded
review of this proposal the Coast Guard
has decided to maintain this regulation.
This would provide the COTP the
ability to better promote safe navigation
and ensure the viability of the Marine
Transportation System during events
that create unforeseen circumstances for
vessel traffic in the area.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard
proposed to remove the regulation (33
CFR 110.155(c)(5)(ii)) requiring each
vessel to report its position to the
Captain of the Port immediately after
anchoring. Based on the expanded
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
review of this proposal the Coast Guard
has decided to maintain this regulation.
This would provide the COTP the
ability to better promote safe navigation
and ensure the viability of the Marine
Transportation System during events
that create unforeseen circumstances for
vessel traffic in the area.
The Coast Guard proposes to revise
the regulation (33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(iii))
that currently provides that no vessel
may conduct lightering operations in
the anchorage grounds without
receiving permission from the Captain
of the Port. The revision will clarify that
when lightering is requested, the
Captain of the Port must be notified at
least four hours in advance of a vessel
conducting lightering operations as
required by 33 CFR 156.118.
The Coast Guard proposes to remove
the regulation (33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(iv))
requiring each vessel to move when the
Captain of the Port notifies them the
Anchorage is required by naval vessels.
This regulation is no longer required as
the closest naval facility is now located
approximately 22 nautical miles away at
Earle, NJ. Additionally, vessels may still
be required to shift their position into,
or within, the anchorage under the
authority of 33 CFR 110.155(l)(12).
The Coast Guard proposes to revise
the regulation (33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(v))
requiring 48 hours advance notice to the
Captain of the Port from vessels over
800 feet in length overall, or 40 feet in
draft, requesting to use the anchorages.
We propose to limit the use of the
anchorage grounds to tugs and/or
barges. Ships will not be authorized to
anchor in these proposed anchorage
grounds as they are already anchoring
outside of the Federal Channel, off
Yonkers, NY, approximately 5 to 10
nautical miles north of these proposed
revised anchorage grounds.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a
requirement that any vessel conducting
lightering or bunkering operations shall
display by day a red flag (Pub 102;
International Code of Signals; signaling
instructions) at its mast head or at least
10 feet above the upper deck if the
vessel has no mast, and by night the flag
must be illuminated by spotlight. These
signals shall be in addition to day
signals, lights and whistle signals as
required by rules 30 (33 U.S.C 2030) and
35 (33 U.S.C. 2035) of the Inland
Navigation Rules when at anchor in a
general anchorage area. Within an
anchorage, fishing and navigation
would be prohibited within 500 yards of
an anchored vessel displaying a red flag
by day or a red light by night.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a
regulation (33 CFR 110.155(c)950(i)(D))
to specify that these anchorage grounds
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
are only authorized for use by tugs and/
or barges.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. This conclusion is based
upon the fact that there are no fees,
permits, or specialized requirements for
the maritime industry to utilize these
anchorage areas. The regulation is solely
for the purpose of advancing safety of
maritime commerce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
through the proposed Anchorage
Grounds 19 East and 19 West. Vessels
intending to anchor in the current
Anchorage Ground No. 19 would still be
able to anchor in the revised Anchorage
Ground No. 19 East or No. 19 West.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Assistance for Small Entities
Protection of Children
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Mr. Jeff
Yunker at 718–354–4195. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Federalism
Energy Effects
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Collection of Information
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22329
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves changing the size of anchorage
grounds resulting in a reduction in the
overall size of the anchorage area. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 110.155 by revising
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
§ 110.155
Port of New York.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Anchorages No. 19 East and 19
West.
(i) Anchorage No. 19 East. All waters
of the Hudson River bound by the
following points: 40°49′42.6″ N,
073°57′14.7″ W; thence to 40°49′45.9″ N,
073°57′22.0″ W; thence to 40°49′52.0″ N,
073°57′22.0″ W; thence to 40°50′08.3″ N,
073°57′10.8″ W; thence to 40°50′55.4″ N,
073°56′59.7″W; thence to 40°51′02.5″ N,
073°56′57.4″ W; thence to 40°51′00.8″ N,
073°56′49.4″ W; thence along the
shoreline to the point of origin (NAD
83).
(ii) Anchorage No. 19 West. All waters
of the Hudson River bound by the
following points: 40°46′56.3″ N,
073°59′42.2″ W; thence to 40°47′36.9″ N,
073°59′11.7″ W; thence to 40°49′31.3″ N,
073°57′43.8″ W; thence to 40°49′40.2″ N,
073°57′37.6″ W; thence to 40°49′52.4″ N,
073°57′37.6″ W; thence to 40°49′57.7″ N,
073°57′47.3″ W; thence to 40°49′32.2″ N,
073°58′12.9″ W; thence to 40°49′00.7″ N,
073°58′33.1″ W; thence to 40°48′28.7″ N,
073°58′53.8″ W; thence to 40°47′38.2″ N,
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22330
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
073°59′31.2″ W; thence to 40°47′02.7″ N,
073°59′57.4″ W; thence to the point of
origin. (NAD 83).
(iii) The following regulations apply
to 33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i) and (ii):
(A) No vessel may conduct lightering
operations in these anchorage grounds
without permission from the Captain of
the Port. When lightering is authorized,
the Captain of the Port New York must
be notified at least four hours in
advance of a vessel conducting
lightering operations as required by
§ 156.118 of this title.
(B) Any vessel conducting lightering
or bunkering operations shall display by
day a red flag (Pub 102; International
Code of Signals; signaling instructions)
at its mast head or at least 10 feet above
the upper deck if the vessel has no mast,
and by night the flag must be
illuminated by spotlight. These signals
shall be in addition to day signals, lights
and whistle signals as required by rules
30 (33 U.S.C 2030) and 35 (33 U.S.C.
2035) of the Inland Navigation Rules
when at anchor in a general anchorage
area.
(C) Within an anchorage, fishing and
navigation are prohibited within 500
yards of an anchored vessel displaying
a red flag.
(D) These anchorage grounds are only
authorized for use by tugs and/or barges.
(E) No vessel may occupy this
anchorage ground for a period of time in
excess of 96 hours without prior
approval of the Captain of the Port.
(F) No vessel may anchor in
Anchorage No. 19 East or No. 19 West
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(G) Each vessel shall report its
position within Anchorage No. 19 East
or No. 19 West to the Captain of the Port
immediately after anchoring.
(H) All coordinates referenced use
datum: NAD 83.
*
*
*
*
*
Joseph L. Nimmich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–9850 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0249]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of Chicago’s July 4th
Celebration Fireworks, Lake Michigan,
Chicago, IL
Submitting Comments
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on Lake
Michigan near Chicago, Illinois. This
zone is intended to restrict vessels from
a portion of Lake Michigan due to
multiple firework displays. This
proposed safety zone is necessary to
protect the surrounding public and their
vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0249 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Adam
Kraft, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan; telephone 414–747–7154, email Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0249),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0249’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22323-22330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9850]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG 2008-1082]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Port of New York
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document supplements the Coast Guard's September 2009
proposal to amend Anchorage Ground No. 19 located east of the
Edgewater-Weehawken Federal Channel on the Hudson River. The revised
proposal is necessary to facilitate safe navigation and provide safe
and secure anchorages for vessels operating in the area. This
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking amends the NPRM that
incorrectly stated that the current Edgewater-Weehawken Federal Channel
would be relocated as part of the
[[Page 22324]]
proposal to amend Anchorage Ground No. 19. This SNPRM also cancels two
proposed changes to the Anchorage Regulation discussed in the NPRM and
provides an additional opportunity for comment on the proposed changes
to the regulations for Anchorage 19.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2008-1082 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Jeff Yunker, Coast Guard Sector New York,
Waterways Management Division; telephone 718-354-4195, e-mail
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1082), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov and
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop-down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2008-1082'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' and then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov and
click on the ``Read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2008-1082'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But, you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
The Hudson River Pilots Association, through the Port of New York/
New Jersey Harbor Safety, Navigation and Operations Committee, has
requested that the Coast Guard revise the boundaries of Anchorage
Ground No. 19 which is located on the Hudson River, east of the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel and south of the George Washington
Bridge.
Due to severe recurring shoaling within the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel, the Hudson River Pilots requested and received
authorization from the Coast Guard and Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
to pilot vessels through the deeper and safer water located within the
boundaries of Anchorage Ground No. 19.
Due to shoaling, the March 2007 ACOE survey verified a controlling
depth of 27 feet in the Right outside Quarter of the Weehawken-
Edgewater Federal Channel where vessels bound for ports north of New
York City would have to transit. As published by the ACOE Institute for
Water Resources, vessels with drafts of up to 34 feet transit the
Hudson River. In calendar year 2006, there were 6,562 transits on the
Hudson River between the mouth of the Harlem River and Waterford, NY by
vessels with a draft of 27 feet or greater. Vessels with a draft of 27
feet or greater would be required to transit through the deeper water
which is within the current boundaries of Anchorage Ground No.19.
Tug and barge traffic within the harbor has increased 37% since
1991. Anchorage Ground No. 19 is the closest Anchorage Ground available
for use when there is no space for temporary anchoring within the Upper
New York Bay Anchorage Grounds. Hence, these vessels transit to
Anchorage Ground No. 19 to await a berth, or orders, to minimize fuel
consumption and provide
[[Page 22325]]
an orderly flow of commerce within the harbor and the New England
region.
On October 14, 2008, the Coast Guard Captain of the Port New York
issued an Advisory Notice notifying the maritime community that in
accordance with 33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i), vessels would only be allowed
to anchor on the western boundary of Anchorage Ground No. 19. This
temporary solution was necessary to facilitate deep draft vessel
transit through the eastern portion of Anchorage Ground No. 19.
On September 9, 2009, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Anchorage Regulations; Port of New
York and Vicinity'' (Docket number USCG-2009-1082) in the Federal
Register (74 FR 47906). The proposal sought to amend Anchorage Ground
No. 19 by dividing it into two separate anchorages (Anchorage Ground
No. 19 West and Anchorage Ground No. 19 East), and relocating the
majority of the anchorage area to the western side of the Hudson River.
The proposed change would allow deep draft vessels to transit the
deeper water without having to transit through Anchorage Ground No. 19.
In that NPRM, it was stated that the ACOE would relocate the
Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel to the east of its current location
and the Coast Guard would relocate Anchorage Ground No. 19 to the west
of its current location.
Since the publication of the NPRM, the ACOE has advised the Coast
Guard that it does not intend to seek Congressional action to de-
authorize the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel. However, the ACOE
also advised that it does not object to the Coast Guard establishing an
Anchorage Ground in the existing Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel.
Consequently, to facilitate safe navigation of deep draft vessels
the Coast Guard revises its proposal to disestablish Anchorage Ground
No. 19 and establish two separate anchorage grounds, Anchorage Ground
19 West and Anchorage Ground No. 19 East. This would be accomplished by
dividing Anchorage Ground No. 19 into an east and a west portion and
relocating the majority of the anchorage area (new Anchorage Ground No.
19 West) from the eastern half of the Hudson River to the western half
closer to the New Jersey shore (over the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal
Channel). The following graphics display the current boundary of
Anchorage Ground No. 19 and the proposed boundaries of Anchorage
Grounds No. 19 East and No. 19 West:
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[[Page 22326]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AP10.019
[[Page 22327]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AP10.020
BILLING CODE 9110-04-C
Disestablishing Anchorage Ground No. 19 and establishing Anchorage
Ground No. 19 East and Anchorage Ground No. 19 West would create a 400
yard wide area of deeper water between the newly established anchorage
grounds. This proposed change would allow deep draft vessels to transit
the deeper water without having to transit through an anchorage ground.
The Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel is authorized by Congress,
and constructed and maintained by the ACOE. The ACOE has advised the
Coast Guard that no portion of the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel
will be relocated in conjunction with the proposed reapportionment,
relocation and establishment of Anchorage Ground No. 19 into two new
anchorage grounds. The ACOE has further advised that establishment of
an anchorage ground in the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel is not
expected to impede navigation or a need to maintain channel depth
because the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel currently supports no
deep draft vessel traffic.
According to the ACOE the Weehawken-Edgewater Federal Channel was
originally intended to support commercial vessel operations on the New
Jersey waterfront in the vicinity of the Channel. However, due to
changes in shoreline usage from industrial to residential and
recreational, the original intent of the Channel no longer exists. As a
result there has not been a need to dredge the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel segment to its authorized depth since it was last
maintenance dredged in 1994.
The ACOE further advised that it does not appear likely that a need
will arise in the foreseeable future to maintain the Channel for deep
draft vessel traffic intending to access New Jersey waterfront and
shore facilities. However, should a need recur in the future to
accommodate deep draft traffic, the use of the areas as anchorage
grounds would be re-evaluated.
In the interest of safe navigation and to minimize confusion, the
ACOE and the USCG will request that the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) remove the Weehawken-Edgewater
Federal Channel designation from NOAA charts. In addition, the Coast
Guard will request chart corrections removing Anchorage Ground No. 19
boundary line designation and adding the boundary lines for the
proposed Anchorage
[[Page 22328]]
Ground No. 19 West and Anchorage Ground No. 19 East.
Discussion of Revised Proposed Rule
In this rule the Coast Guard proposes to concurrently disestablish
Anchorage Ground No. 19 and establish Anchorage Ground No. 19 East and
Anchorage Ground No. 19 West. The following are the proposed boundaries
of the new Anchorage Grounds:
(1) Anchorage No. 19 East, bound by the following points:
40[deg]49'42.6'' N, 073[deg]57'14.7'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'45.9'' N,
073[deg]57'22.0'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'52.0'' N, 073[deg]57'22.0'' W;
thence to 40[deg]50'08.3'' N, 073[deg]57'10.8'' W; thence to
40[deg]50'55.4'' N, 073[deg]56'59.7'' W; thence to 40[deg]51'02.5'' N,
073[deg]56'57.4'' W; thence to 40[deg]51'00.8'' N, 073[deg]56'49.4'' W;
thence along the shoreline to the point of origin (NAD 83).
(2) Anchorage No. 19 West, would be bound by the following points:
40[deg]46'56.3'' N, 073[deg]59'42.2'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'36.9'' N,
073[deg]59'11.7'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'31.3'' N, 073[deg]57'43.8'' W;
thence to 40[deg]49'40.2'' N, 073[deg]57'37.6'' W; thence to
40[deg]49'52.4'' N, 073[deg]57'37.6'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'57.7'' N,
073[deg]57'47.3'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'32.2'' N, 073[deg]58'12.9'' W;
thence to 40[deg]49'00.7'' N, 073[deg]58'33.1'' W; thence to
40[deg]48'28.7'' N, 073[deg]58'53.8'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'38.2'' N,
073[deg]59'31.2'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'02.7'' N, 073[deg]59'57.4'' W;
thence to the point of origin (NAD 83).
Currently, Anchorage Ground No. 19 covers approximately 1,352 acres.
The proposed Anchorage Ground No. 19 West would cover approximately
714.5 acres, and Anchorage Ground No. 19 East would cover 185.5 acres.
There would be a 400-yard-wide space separating the two Anchorage
Grounds. The depth of the water in the 400 yard wide space separating
the two proposed Anchorage Grounds is sufficient to allow deep draft
vessels to safely navigate and transit.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard proposed to remove the regulation (33
CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i)) requiring all vessels to obtain permission from
the Captain of the Port (COTP) prior to anchoring. Based on the
expanded review of this proposal the Coast Guard has decided to
maintain this regulation. This would provide the COTP the ability to
better promote safe navigation and ensure the viability of the Marine
Transportation System during events that create unforeseen
circumstances for vessel traffic in the area.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard proposed to remove the regulation (33
CFR 110.155(c)(5)(ii)) requiring each vessel to report its position to
the Captain of the Port immediately after anchoring. Based on the
expanded review of this proposal the Coast Guard has decided to
maintain this regulation. This would provide the COTP the ability to
better promote safe navigation and ensure the viability of the Marine
Transportation System during events that create unforeseen
circumstances for vessel traffic in the area.
The Coast Guard proposes to revise the regulation (33 CFR
110.155(c)(5)(iii)) that currently provides that no vessel may conduct
lightering operations in the anchorage grounds without receiving
permission from the Captain of the Port. The revision will clarify that
when lightering is requested, the Captain of the Port must be notified
at least four hours in advance of a vessel conducting lightering
operations as required by 33 CFR 156.118.
The Coast Guard proposes to remove the regulation (33 CFR
110.155(c)(5)(iv)) requiring each vessel to move when the Captain of
the Port notifies them the Anchorage is required by naval vessels. This
regulation is no longer required as the closest naval facility is now
located approximately 22 nautical miles away at Earle, NJ.
Additionally, vessels may still be required to shift their position
into, or within, the anchorage under the authority of 33 CFR
110.155(l)(12).
The Coast Guard proposes to revise the regulation (33 CFR
110.155(c)(5)(v)) requiring 48 hours advance notice to the Captain of
the Port from vessels over 800 feet in length overall, or 40 feet in
draft, requesting to use the anchorages. We propose to limit the use of
the anchorage grounds to tugs and/or barges. Ships will not be
authorized to anchor in these proposed anchorage grounds as they are
already anchoring outside of the Federal Channel, off Yonkers, NY,
approximately 5 to 10 nautical miles north of these proposed revised
anchorage grounds.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a requirement that any vessel
conducting lightering or bunkering operations shall display by day a
red flag (Pub 102; International Code of Signals; signaling
instructions) at its mast head or at least 10 feet above the upper deck
if the vessel has no mast, and by night the flag must be illuminated by
spotlight. These signals shall be in addition to day signals, lights
and whistle signals as required by rules 30 (33 U.S.C 2030) and 35 (33
U.S.C. 2035) of the Inland Navigation Rules when at anchor in a general
anchorage area. Within an anchorage, fishing and navigation would be
prohibited within 500 yards of an anchored vessel displaying a red flag
by day or a red light by night.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a regulation (33 CFR
110.155(c)950(i)(D)) to specify that these anchorage grounds are only
authorized for use by tugs and/or barges.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This
conclusion is based upon the fact that there are no fees, permits, or
specialized requirements for the maritime industry to utilize these
anchorage areas. The regulation is solely for the purpose of advancing
safety of maritime commerce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit through the proposed
Anchorage Grounds 19 East and 19 West. Vessels intending to anchor in
the current Anchorage Ground No. 19 would still be able to anchor in
the revised Anchorage Ground No. 19 East or No. 19 West.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
[[Page 22329]]
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Mr. Jeff Yunker at 718-354-4195.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question
or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
changing the size of anchorage grounds resulting in a reduction in the
overall size of the anchorage area. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071;
33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Amend Sec. 110.155 by revising paragraph (c)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 110.155 Port of New York.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Anchorages No. 19 East and 19 West.
(i) Anchorage No. 19 East. All waters of the Hudson River bound by
the following points: 40[deg]49'42.6'' N, 073[deg]57'14.7'' W; thence
to 40[deg]49'45.9'' N, 073[deg]57'22.0'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'52.0''
N, 073[deg]57'22.0'' W; thence to 40[deg]50'08.3'' N, 073[deg]57'10.8''
W; thence to 40[deg]50'55.4'' N, 073[deg]56'59.7''W; thence to
40[deg]51'02.5'' N, 073[deg]56'57.4'' W; thence to 40[deg]51'00.8'' N,
073[deg]56'49.4'' W; thence along the shoreline to the point of origin
(NAD 83).
(ii) Anchorage No. 19 West. All waters of the Hudson River bound by
the following points: 40[deg]46'56.3'' N, 073[deg]59'42.2'' W; thence
to 40[deg]47'36.9'' N, 073[deg]59'11.7'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'31.3''
N, 073[deg]57'43.8'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'40.2'' N, 073[deg]57'37.6''
W; thence to 40[deg]49'52.4'' N, 073[deg]57'37.6'' W; thence to
40[deg]49'57.7'' N, 073[deg]57'47.3'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'32.2'' N,
073[deg]58'12.9'' W; thence to 40[deg]49'00.7'' N, 073[deg]58'33.1'' W;
thence to 40[deg]48'28.7'' N, 073[deg]58'53.8'' W; thence to
40[deg]47'38.2'' N,
[[Page 22330]]
073[deg]59'31.2'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'02.7'' N, 073[deg]59'57.4'' W;
thence to the point of origin. (NAD 83).
(iii) The following regulations apply to 33 CFR 110.155(c)(5)(i)
and (ii):
(A) No vessel may conduct lightering operations in these anchorage
grounds without permission from the Captain of the Port. When
lightering is authorized, the Captain of the Port New York must be
notified at least four hours in advance of a vessel conducting
lightering operations as required by Sec. 156.118 of this title.
(B) Any vessel conducting lightering or bunkering operations shall
display by day a red flag (Pub 102; International Code of Signals;
signaling instructions) at its mast head or at least 10 feet above the
upper deck if the vessel has no mast, and by night the flag must be
illuminated by spotlight. These signals shall be in addition to day
signals, lights and whistle signals as required by rules 30 (33 U.S.C
2030) and 35 (33 U.S.C. 2035) of the Inland Navigation Rules when at
anchor in a general anchorage area.
(C) Within an anchorage, fishing and navigation are prohibited
within 500 yards of an anchored vessel displaying a red flag.
(D) These anchorage grounds are only authorized for use by tugs
and/or barges.
(E) No vessel may occupy this anchorage ground for a period of time
in excess of 96 hours without prior approval of the Captain of the
Port.
(F) No vessel may anchor in Anchorage No. 19 East or No. 19 West
without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(G) Each vessel shall report its position within Anchorage No. 19
East or No. 19 West to the Captain of the Port immediately after
anchoring.
(H) All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 83.
* * * * *
Joseph L. Nimmich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-9850 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P