Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the Barview Jetty, Tillamook Bay, OR, 22336-22338 [2010-9839]
Download as PDF
22336
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0214]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the
Barview Jetty, Tillamook Bay, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the
establishment of a safety zone
surrounding the north jetty, named the
Barview Jetty near Tillamook Bay,
Oregon. The safety zone is necessary to
help ensure the safety of work crews
and the maritime public while the jetty
is being repaired and will do so by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from
entering or remaining within 250 feet of
the jetty unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0214 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Portland; telephone 503–
240–9319, e-mail
Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0214),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0214’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0214’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The north jetty, named the Barview
Jetty, near Tillamook Bay, Oregon has
deteriorated to the point that the United
States Army Corps of Engineers has
contracted Kiewit Corporation to repair
the jetty. The repairs will begin in June
2010 and will involve the use of a track
mounted Manitowoc 18,000 lb crane
with as much as 200 feet of boom. The
crane will be used to move large granite
boulders weighing approximately 20 to
50 tons each by lifting them up, circling
them out over the waterway on either
side of the north jetty, and placing them
into the jetty.
Due to the inherent dangers
associated with such operations, the
Coast Guard is proposing the
establishment of a safety zone covering
all waters within 250 feet in every
direction of the north jetty, named the
Barview Jetty. The safety zone will help
ensure the safety of work crews and the
maritime public while the jetty is being
repaired by prohibiting all persons and
vessels from entering or remaining in
the zone unless specifically authorized
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Small Entities
by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone created by
this rule will be in effect from 12:01
a.m. June 15, 2010 until 11:59 p.m.
September 30, 2010. The proposed
safety zone will cover all waters within
250 feet in every direction of the north
jetty, named the Barview Jetty, near
Tillamook Bay, Oregon starting at
latitude 45°34′12″ N, longitude
123°57′31″ W; thence heading offshore
to latitude 45°34′12″ N, longitude
123°57′02″ W; thence across the tip of
the jetty to latitude 45°34′17.5″ N,
longitude 123°57′02″ W; thence back
inland to latitude 45°34′15″ N, longitude
123°57′31″ W. All persons and vessels
will be prohibited from entering or
remaining in the zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port or his designated
representative. Unless other safety
concerns exist, maritime traffic will
generally be given permission to transit
the zone when work is not actively
being conducted.
The Coast Guard expects the
temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register because delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
public interest due to the need to
protect the public from the dangers
associated with construction projects,
such as the use of heavy machinery in
jetty repair operations.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety
zone, the effect of the rule will not be
significant because: (i) The safety zone
will only be in effect during the 31⁄2
months repairs are being made to the
north jetty, named the Barview Jetty; (ii)
the zone is of limited size; and (iii)
maritime traffic will be able to transit
the zone with the permission of the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
22337
Federalism
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the
following entities some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators
of vessels intending to operate in the
area covered by the safety zone. The
safety zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, however,
because the safety zone will only be in
effect during the 31⁄2 months repairs are
being made to the north jetty, named the
Barview Jetty, and maritime traffic will
be able to transit the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact MST1 Jaime
Sayers at phone number 503–240–9319
or by e-mail at Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22338
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Energy Effects
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 20
[WT Docket No. 05–265; FCC 10–59]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
Reexamination of Roaming Obligations
of Commercial Mobile Radio Service
Providers
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–137 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T13–137 Safety Zone; North Jetty,
Named the Barview Jetty, Tillamook Bay,
OR.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters within 250 feet
in every direction of the north jetty,
named the Barview Jetty, near
Tillamook Bay, Oregon starting at
latitude 45°34′12″ N, longitude
123°57′31″ W; thence heading offshore
to latitude 45°34′12″ N, longitude
123°57′02″ W; thence across the tip of
the jetty to latitude 45°34′17.5″ N,
longitude 123°57′02″ W; thence back
inland to latitude 45°34′15″ N, longitude
123°57′31″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in
paragraph (a) of this section or bring,
cause to be brought, or allow to remain
in the safety zone created in paragraph
(a) of this section any vehicle, vessel or
object unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
(c) Effective Period. The safety zone
created in paragraph (a) of this section
will be in effect from 12:01 a.m. June 15,
2010 until 11:59 p.m. September 30,
2010.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010–9839 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: The Commission addresses in
this Second Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Second FNPRM) whether
to extend roaming obligations to data
services that are provided without
interconnection to the public switched
network—including mobile broadband
services.
DATES: Interested parties may file
comments on or before June 14, 2010,
and reply comments on or before July
12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed
using: (1) The Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
Federal Government’s eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See
Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St., SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries
must be held together with rubber bands
or fasteners. Any envelopes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22336-22338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9839]
[[Page 22336]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0214]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the Barview Jetty, Tillamook Bay,
OR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the establishment of a safety zone
surrounding the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty near Tillamook
Bay, Oregon. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of
work crews and the maritime public while the jetty is being repaired
and will do so by prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering or
remaining within 250 feet of the jetty unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0214 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management Division,
Coast Guard Sector Portland; telephone 503-240-9319, e-mail
Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0214), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0214'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0214'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
The north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, near Tillamook Bay,
Oregon has deteriorated to the point that the United States Army Corps
of Engineers has contracted Kiewit Corporation to repair the jetty. The
repairs will begin in June 2010 and will involve the use of a track
mounted Manitowoc 18,000 lb crane with as much as 200 feet of boom. The
crane will be used to move large granite boulders weighing
approximately 20 to 50 tons each by lifting them up, circling them out
over the waterway on either side of the north jetty, and placing them
into the jetty.
Due to the inherent dangers associated with such operations, the
Coast Guard is proposing the establishment of a safety zone covering
all waters within 250 feet in every direction of the north jetty, named
the Barview Jetty. The safety zone will help ensure the safety of work
crews and the maritime public while the jetty is being repaired by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering or remaining in the
zone unless specifically authorized
[[Page 22337]]
by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone created by this rule will be in effect
from 12:01 a.m. June 15, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. September 30, 2010. The
proposed safety zone will cover all waters within 250 feet in every
direction of the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, near Tillamook
Bay, Oregon starting at latitude 45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude
123[deg]57'31'' W; thence heading offshore to latitude 45[deg]34'12''
N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence across the tip of the jetty to
latitude 45[deg]34'17.5'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence back
inland to latitude 45[deg]34'15'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering or remaining in
the zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative. Unless other safety concerns exist,
maritime traffic will generally be given permission to transit the zone
when work is not actively being conducted.
The Coast Guard expects the temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because
delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public interest
due to the need to protect the public from the dangers associated with
construction projects, such as the use of heavy machinery in jetty
repair operations.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of the rule
will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will only be in
effect during the 3\1/2\ months repairs are being made to the north
jetty, named the Barview Jetty; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and
(iii) maritime traffic will be able to transit the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule may affect the following entities
some of which may be small entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in the area covered by the safety zone.
The safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, however, because the safety zone
will only be in effect during the 3\1/2\ months repairs are being made
to the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, and maritime traffic will
be able to transit the zone with the permission of the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact MST1 Jaime Sayers at phone
number 503-240-9319 or by e-mail at Jaime.A.Sayers@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
[[Page 22338]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-137 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-137 Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the Barview Jetty,
Tillamook Bay, OR.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
within 250 feet in every direction of the north jetty, named the
Barview Jetty, near Tillamook Bay, Oregon starting at latitude
45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W; thence heading offshore
to latitude 45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence
across the tip of the jetty to latitude 45[deg]34'17.5'' N, longitude
123[deg]57'02'' W; thence back inland to latitude 45[deg]34'15'' N,
longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in paragraph (a) of this section or bring, cause to be
brought, or allow to remain in the safety zone created in paragraph (a)
of this section any vehicle, vessel or object unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
(c) Effective Period. The safety zone created in paragraph (a) of
this section will be in effect from 12:01 a.m. June 15, 2010 until
11:59 p.m. September 30, 2010.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010-9839 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P