Minimum Quality and Handling Standards for Domestic and Imported Peanuts Marketed in the United States; Section 610 Review, 22213 [2010-9833]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
handlers have already received 2010
olives from growers, the fiscal year
began on January 1, 2010, and the
assessment rate applies to all olives
received during the 2010 and
subsequent seasons. Further, handlers
are aware of this rule, which was
recommended at a public meeting. Also,
a 30-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Olive, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is amended as
follows:
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 932 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2010, an
assessment rate of $44.72 per ton is
established for California olives.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9827 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 996
[Docket No. AMS–FV–10–0030, FV10–996–
610 Review]
Minimum Quality and Handling
Standards for Domestic and Imported
Peanuts Marketed in the United States;
Section 610 Review
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of review and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This document announces
that the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) plans to review 7 CFR part 996,
Minimum Quality and Handling
Standards for Domestic and Imported
Peanuts Marketed in the United States,
under the criteria contained in section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA).
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by June 28, 2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this notice of review.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
may be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey St., Fresno, California 93721;
Telephone: (559) 487–5110; Fax: (559)
487–5906; or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.; or
Kenneth G. Johnson, DC Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Unit
155, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD
20737; Telephone: (301) 734–5243; Fax:
(301) 734–5275; or E-mail:
Kenneth.Johnson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Minimum Quality and Handling
Standards for Domestic and Imported
Peanuts Marketed in the United States
(Standards), as amended (7 CFR Part
996), were established pursuant to
Public Law 107–171, the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Farm
Bill). The Standards regulate the quality
and handling of domestic and imported
peanuts marketed in the United States.
AMS published in the Federal
Register on August 14, 2003 (68 FR
48574), its plan to review certain
regulations, including the Standards,
under criteria contained in section 610
of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601–612). Because
many AMS regulations impact small
entities, AMS has decided, as a matter
of policy, to review certain regulations
which, although they may not meet the
threshold requirement under section
610 of the RFA, warrant review.
The purpose of the review will be to
determine whether the Standards
should be continued without change,
amended, or rescinded, consistent with
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22213
the stated objectives of applicable
statutes, to minimize the impacts on
small entities. In conducting this
review, AMS will consider the
following factors: (1) The continued
need for the Standards; (2) the nature of
complaints or comments received from
the public concerning the Standards; (3)
the complexity of the Standards; (4) the
extent to which the Standards overlap,
duplicate, or conflict with other Federal
rules, and, to the extent feasible, with
State and local governmental rules; and
(5) the length of time since the
Standards have been evaluated, or the
degree to which technology, economic
conditions, or other factors have
changed in the areas affected by the
Standards.
Written comments, views, opinions,
and other information regarding the
impact the Standards have on small
businesses are invited.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9833 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket Number EERE–2007–BT–TP–0013]
RIN 1904–AB72
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedures for General Service
Fluorescent Lamps, Incandescent
Reflector Lamps, and General Service
Incandescent Lamps; Correction
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendments.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
technical correction to the final rule
regarding the test procedures for general
service fluorescent lamps, incandescent
reflector lamps, and general service
incandescent lamps, which was
published in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2009. In that final rule, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) adopted
amendments to its test procedure
regulations for the above-specified
lamps. However, due to a drafting error,
part of the original wording was
inadvertently removed from the DOE
test procedure regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). This final
rule addresses this issue and restores
the correct and complete language to the
regulations.
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9833]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 996
[Docket No. AMS-FV-10-0030, FV10-996-610 Review]
Minimum Quality and Handling Standards for Domestic and Imported
Peanuts Marketed in the United States; Section 610 Review
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of review and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces that the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) plans to review 7 CFR part 996, Minimum Quality and
Handling Standards for Domestic and Imported Peanuts Marketed in the
United States, under the criteria contained in section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by June 28,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this notice of review. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the docket number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or may be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this notice
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey St., Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-5110; Fax:
(559) 487-5906; or E-mail: Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.; or Kenneth G.
Johnson, DC Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Unit 155, 4700 River
Road, Riverdale, MD 20737; Telephone: (301) 734-5243; Fax: (301) 734-
5275; or E-mail: Kenneth.Johnson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Minimum Quality and Handling Standards
for Domestic and Imported Peanuts Marketed in the United States
(Standards), as amended (7 CFR Part 996), were established pursuant to
Public Law 107-171, the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
(Farm Bill). The Standards regulate the quality and handling of
domestic and imported peanuts marketed in the United States.
AMS published in the Federal Register on August 14, 2003 (68 FR
48574), its plan to review certain regulations, including the
Standards, under criteria contained in section 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C.
601-612). Because many AMS regulations impact small entities, AMS has
decided, as a matter of policy, to review certain regulations which,
although they may not meet the threshold requirement under section 610
of the RFA, warrant review.
The purpose of the review will be to determine whether the
Standards should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded,
consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, to
minimize the impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, AMS
will consider the following factors: (1) The continued need for the
Standards; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the
public concerning the Standards; (3) the complexity of the Standards;
(4) the extent to which the Standards overlap, duplicate, or conflict
with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and
local governmental rules; and (5) the length of time since the
Standards have been evaluated, or the degree to which technology,
economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the areas
affected by the Standards.
Written comments, views, opinions, and other information regarding
the impact the Standards have on small businesses are invited.
Dated: April 22, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-9833 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P