Texas Regulatory Program, 21534-21536 [2010-9574]
Download as PDF
21534
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 16,
2010.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010–9614 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 943
[SATS No. TX–059–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2010–0001]
Texas Regulatory Program
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Texas
regulatory program (Texas program)
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Texas proposes revisions to its
regulations regarding annual permit
fees. Texas intends to revise its program
to improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Texas program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., c.d.t., May 26, 2010. If requested,
we will hold a public hearing on the
amendment on May 21, 2010. We will
accept requests to speak at a hearing
until 4 p.m., c.d.t. on May 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. TX–059–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
Include ‘‘Docket No. TX–059–FOR’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L.
Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East
Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma
74128–4629.
• Fax: (918) 581–6419.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Texas program, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled
public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document, you must go to the address
listed below during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM’s Tulsa Field Office or
going to https://www.regulations.gov.
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645
South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128–4629,
Telephone: (918) 581–6430, E-mail:
aclayborne@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location: Surface
Mining and Reclamation Division,
Railroad Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, Capitol Station,
P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711–
2967, Telephone: (512) 463–6900.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581–
6430. E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Texas Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Texas Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Texas
program effective February 16, 1980.
You can find background information
on the Texas program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Texas program in the
February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45
FR 12998). You can also find later
actions concerning the Texas program
and program amendments at 30 CFR
943.10, 943.15 and 943.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated January 5, 2010
(Administrative Record No. TX–666),
Texas sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) at its own initiative. Below is a
summary of the changes proposed by
Texas. The full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
Texas proposes to revise its regulation
at 16 Texas Administrative Code (TAC)
section 12.108(b) regarding annual
permit fees by:
(1) Decreasing the amount of the fee
for each acre of land within the permit
area on which coal or lignite was
actually removed during the calendar
year,
(2) Increasing the amount of the fee
for each acre of land within a permit
area covered by a reclamation bond on
December 31st of the year, and
(3) Increasing the amount of the fee
for each permit in effect on December
31st of the year.
Texas fully funds its 50% state share
of costs to regulate the coal mining
industry with fees paid by the coal
industry. Texas charges various fees to
meet these costs including permit
application fees, and annual fees for
lands in various stages of mining and
reclamation. The proposed fee revisions
are intended to provide incentives for
industry to accomplish reclamation and
achieve bond release as quickly as
possible. This would be achieved by
decreasing the fee per acre where coal
or lignite is removed, and increasing
both the fee for each acre under permit
and the fee for each permit which
remains active on December 31st of each
year. By making these changes,
companies are encouraged to make
every effort to achieve bond release
before the end of each year.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the State program.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent State or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than those listed (see ADDRESSES)
will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., c.d.t. on May 11, 2010. If you are
disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak have been heard.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA
requires that State laws regulating
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21535
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations be ‘‘in accordance with’’ the
requirements of SMCRA, and section
503(a)(7) requires that State programs
contain rules and regulations
‘‘consistent with’’ regulations issued by
the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve Federal
regulations involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect The Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21536
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Dated: January 22, 2010.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Act of 1934, as amended, provides for
the annual assessment and collection of
regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2)
and 9(b)(3), respectively, for annual
‘‘Mandatory Adjustments’’ and
‘‘Permitted Amendments’’ to the
Schedule of Regulatory Fees.
DATES: Comments are due May 4, 2010,
and reply comments are due May 11,
2010.
Assessment and Collection of
Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by MD Docket No. 10–87, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include MD
Docket No. 10–87 in the subject line of
the message.
• Mail: Commercial overnight mail
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to
9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service
first-class, Express, and Priority mail
should be addressed to 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554.
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418–0444.
SUMMARY: The Commission will revise
its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in order
to recover an amount of $335,794,000
that Congress has required the
Commission to collect for fiscal year
2010. Section 9 of the Communications
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on Wednesday, April 21, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–9574 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 10–87; FCC 10–51]
Adopted: April 12, 2010.
Released: April 13, 2010.
By the Commission.
Table of Contents
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paragraph
I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................................................
1. AM and FM Radio Stations ...................................................................................................................................................
2. Submarine Cable Methodology .............................................................................................................................................
B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service Television Broadcasters ..........................................................................
C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters ....................................................
D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service ..............................................................................................................
E. Administrative and Operational Issues .......................................................................................................................................
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer ...................................................................................................................................................
2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees ...................................................................................................................
a. Pre-Bills ...........................................................................................................................................................................
II. Procedural Matters ...............................................................................................................................................................................
A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets ...................................................................................................................................................
B. Assessment Notifications .............................................................................................................................................................
1. Media Services Licensees ......................................................................................................................................................
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments ..............................................................................................................
C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process ............................................................................................................................
1. Cable Television Subscribers ................................................................................................................................................
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers ...................................................................................................................................
3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (‘‘ITSP’’) ................................................................................................
D. Payment of Regulatory Fees .........................................................................................................................................................
1. Lock Box Bank .......................................................................................................................................................................
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments .......................................................................................................................................
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees .................................................................................................................................................
4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates ....................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
1
2
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
13
14
15
15
18
21
21
22
23
24
24
25
26
27
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21534-21536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9574]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 943
[SATS No. TX-059-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2010-0001]
Texas Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Texas
regulatory program (Texas program) under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Texas proposes revisions to
its regulations regarding annual permit fees. Texas intends to revise
its program to improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and locations that the Texas program
and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
c.d.t., May 26, 2010. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on
the amendment on May 21, 2010. We will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., c.d.t. on May 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. TX-059-
FOR, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov. Include ``Docket No. TX-059-
FOR'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629.
Fax: (918) 581-6419.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Texas
program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in response to this document, you
must go to the address listed below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free
copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Tulsa Field Office or going
to https://www.regulations.gov. Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629,
Telephone: (918) 581-6430, E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following location: Surface Mining and
Reclamation Division, Railroad Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress
Avenue, Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967,
Telephone: (512) 463-6900.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Texas Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Texas Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Texas program effective February 16, 1980. You can find background
information on the Texas program, including the Secretary's findings,
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the
Texas program in the February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 12998).
You can also find later actions concerning the Texas program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 943.10, 943.15 and 943.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated January 5, 2010 (Administrative Record No. TX-666),
Texas sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) at its own initiative. Below is a summary of the changes
proposed by Texas. The full text of the program amendment is available
for you to read at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES.
Texas proposes to revise its regulation at 16 Texas Administrative
Code (TAC) section 12.108(b) regarding annual permit fees by:
(1) Decreasing the amount of the fee for each acre of land within
the permit area on which coal or lignite was actually removed during
the calendar year,
(2) Increasing the amount of the fee for each acre of land within a
permit area covered by a reclamation bond on December 31st of the year,
and
(3) Increasing the amount of the fee for each permit in effect on
December 31st of the year.
Texas fully funds its 50% state share of costs to regulate the coal
mining industry with fees paid by the coal industry. Texas charges
various fees to meet these costs including permit application fees, and
annual fees for lands in various stages of mining and reclamation. The
proposed fee revisions are intended to provide incentives for industry
to accomplish reclamation and achieve bond release as quickly as
possible. This would be achieved by decreasing the fee per acre where
coal or lignite is removed, and increasing both the fee for each acre
under permit and the fee for each permit which remains active on
December 31st of each year. By making these changes, companies are
encouraged to make every effort to achieve bond release before the end
of each year.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the State program.
[[Page 21535]]
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those
listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., c.d.t. on May
11, 2010. If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve Federal regulations involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect The
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities
[[Page 21536]]
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was prepared and
certification made that such regulations would not have a significant
economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. In making
the determination as to whether this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and assumptions
for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: January 22, 2010.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on Wednesday, April 21, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010-9574 Filed 4-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P