Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010, 21536-21567 [2010-9553]
Download as PDF
21536
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Dated: January 22, 2010.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Act of 1934, as amended, provides for
the annual assessment and collection of
regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2)
and 9(b)(3), respectively, for annual
‘‘Mandatory Adjustments’’ and
‘‘Permitted Amendments’’ to the
Schedule of Regulatory Fees.
DATES: Comments are due May 4, 2010,
and reply comments are due May 11,
2010.
Assessment and Collection of
Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by MD Docket No. 10–87, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include MD
Docket No. 10–87 in the subject line of
the message.
• Mail: Commercial overnight mail
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to
9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service
first-class, Express, and Priority mail
should be addressed to 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554.
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418–0444.
SUMMARY: The Commission will revise
its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in order
to recover an amount of $335,794,000
that Congress has required the
Commission to collect for fiscal year
2010. Section 9 of the Communications
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on Wednesday, April 21, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–9574 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 10–87; FCC 10–51]
Adopted: April 12, 2010.
Released: April 13, 2010.
By the Commission.
Table of Contents
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paragraph
I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................................................
1. AM and FM Radio Stations ...................................................................................................................................................
2. Submarine Cable Methodology .............................................................................................................................................
B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service Television Broadcasters ..........................................................................
C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters ....................................................
D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service ..............................................................................................................
E. Administrative and Operational Issues .......................................................................................................................................
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer ...................................................................................................................................................
2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees ...................................................................................................................
a. Pre-Bills ...........................................................................................................................................................................
II. Procedural Matters ...............................................................................................................................................................................
A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets ...................................................................................................................................................
B. Assessment Notifications .............................................................................................................................................................
1. Media Services Licensees ......................................................................................................................................................
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments ..............................................................................................................
C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process ............................................................................................................................
1. Cable Television Subscribers ................................................................................................................................................
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers ...................................................................................................................................
3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (‘‘ITSP’’) ................................................................................................
D. Payment of Regulatory Fees .........................................................................................................................................................
1. Lock Box Bank .......................................................................................................................................................................
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments .......................................................................................................................................
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees .................................................................................................................................................
4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates ....................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
1
2
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
13
14
15
15
18
21
21
22
23
24
24
25
26
27
21537
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph
E. Enforcement ..................................................................................................................................................................................
F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis .........................................................................................................................................
G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis ....................................................................................................................
H. Congressional Review Act Analysis ............................................................................................................................................
I. Ex Parte Rules ................................................................................................................................................................................
J. Filing Requirements .......................................................................................................................................................................
III. Ordering Clauses .................................................................................................................................................................................
Appendix A Calculation of FY 2010 Revenue Requirements and Pro-Rata Fees
Appendix B FY 2010 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
Appendix C Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010
Appendix D Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go Into Determining Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages
Appendix E Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Appendix F FY 2009 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, we propose to collect
$335,794,000 in regulatory fees for
Fiscal Year (‘‘FY’’) 2010, pursuant to
section 9 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). Section 9
regulatory fees are mandated by
Congress and are collected to recover
the regulatory costs associated with the
Commission’s enforcement, policy and
rulemaking, user information, and
international activities.1 The annual
regulatory fee amount to be collected is
established each year in the
Commission’s Annual Appropriations
Act which is adopted by Congress and
signed by the President and which
funds the Commission.2 In this annual
regulatory fee proceeding, we retain
many of the established methods,
policies, and procedures for collecting
section 9 regulatory fees adopted by the
Commission in prior years. Consistent
with our established practice, we intend
to collect these regulatory fees during an
August 2010 filing window in order to
collect the required amount by the end
of our fiscal year.
A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment
Methodology
2. In our FY 2010 regulatory fee
assessment, we will use the same
section 9 regulatory fee assessment
methodology adopted in FY 2009. Each
fiscal year, the Commission
proportionally allocates the total
amount that must be collected via
section 9 regulatory fees. The results of
our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment
methodology (including a comparison to
the prior year’s results) are contained in
Appendix A. To collect the
$335,794,000 required by Congress, we
1 47
U.S.C. 159(a).
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010,
Public Law 111–117 for the FY 2010 appropriations
act language for the Commission establishing the
amount of $335,794,000 of offsetting collections to
be assessed and collected by the Commission
pursuant to section 9 of the Communications Act.
2 See
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
adjust the FY 2009 amount downward
by 1.8 percent and allocate this amount
across the various fee categories.
Consistent with past practice, we then
divide the FY 2010 amount by the
number of estimated payment units in
each fee category to determine the unit
fee.3 As in prior years, for cases
involving small fees, e.g., licenses that
are renewed over a multiyear term, we
divide the resulting unit fee by the term
of the license and then rounded these
unit fees consistent with the
requirements of section 9(b)(2) of the
Act.
3. In calculating the FY 2010
regulatory fees listed in Appendix B, we
further adjusted the FY 2009 list of
payment units (see Appendix C) based
upon licensee databases, industry and
trade group projections, as well as prior
year payment information. In some
instances, Commission licensee
databases were used; in other instances,
actual prior year payment records and/
or industry and trade association
projections were used in determining
the payment unit counts.4 Where
appropriate, we adjusted and rounded
our final estimates to take into
3 In
many instances, the regulatory fee amount is
a flat fee per licensee or regulatee. In some
instances, the fee amount represents a per-unit fee
(such as for International Bearer Circuits), a per-unit
subscriber fee (such as for Cable, Commercial
Mobile Radio Service (‘‘CMRS’’) Cellular/Mobile
and CMRS Messaging), or a fee factor per revenue
dollar (Interstate Telecommunications Service
Provider (‘‘ITSP’’) fee). The payment unit is the
measure upon which the fee is based, such as a
licensee, regulatee, or subscriber fee.
4 The databases we consulted are the following:
The Commission’s Universal Licensing System
(‘‘ULS’’), International Bureau Filing System
(‘‘IBFS’’), Consolidated Database System (‘‘CDBS’’)
and Cable Operations and Licensing System
(‘‘COALS’’). We also consulted reports generated
within the Commission such as the Wireline
Competition Bureau’s Trends in Telephone Service
and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau’s
Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast and
Annual CMRS Competition Report, as well as
industry sources including, but not limited to,
Television & Cable Factbook by Warren Publishing,
Inc. and the Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook by
Reed Elsevier, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28
30
31
32
33
34
39
consideration events that may impact
the number of units for which regulatees
submit payment, such as waivers and
exemptions that may be filed in FY
2010, and fluctuations in the number of
licenses or station operators due to
economic, technical, or other reasons.
Our estimated FY 2010 payment units,
therefore, are based on several variable
factors that are relevant to each fee
category. The fee rate also may be
rounded or adjusted slightly to account
for these variables.
1. AM and FM Radio Stations
4. As in previous years, we consider
the additional factors of facility
attributes and the population served by
each radio station in determining
regulatory fees for AM and FM radio
stations. The calculation of the
population served is determined by
coupling current U.S. Census Bureau
data with technical and engineering
data, as detailed in Appendix D.
Consequently, the population served, as
well as the class and type of service
(AM or FM), will continue to determine
the amount of regulatory fee to be paid.5
2. Submarine Cable Methodology
5. In its Second Report and Order
(‘‘Submarine Cable Order’’) released on
March 24, 2009, the Commission
adopted a new submarine cable bearer
circuit methodology that assessed
regulatory fees on a per cable landing
license basis, with higher fees for larger
submarine cable systems and lower fees
for smaller systems, without
distinguishing between common
5 In addition, beginning in FY 2005, we
established a procedure by which we set regulatory
fees for AM and FM radio and VHF and UHF
television Construction Permits each year at an
amount no higher than the lowest regulatory fee for
a licensed station in that respective service
category. For example, in FY 2009 the regulatory fee
for an AM radio station Construction Permit was no
higher than the regulatory fee for an AM Class C
radio station serving a population of less than
25,000.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21538
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
carriers and non-common carriers.6 For
all other categories of international
bearer circuits—common carrier and
non-common carrier satellite facilities
and common carrier terrestrial
facilities—the Submarine Cable Order
retained the existing regulatory fee
methodology of assessing fees on a per
64 kbps circuit basis.
6. In the Submarine Cable Order and
in the FY 2009 Regulatory Fees Report
and Order,7 the Commission allocated
the total FY 2009 bearer circuit expected
revenue into two revenue components:
A submarine cable revenue component
(87.6 percent) and a satellite/terrestrial
revenue component (12.4 percent) using
the Consensus Proposal allocation
adopted by the Commission in the
Submarine Cable Order.8 According to
the Consensus Proposal, this allocation
of 87.6 percent (submarine cable) and
12.4 percent (satellite/terrestrial) was
calculated by determining the revenue
obligations of submarine cable systems
with the revenue obligations of the
satellite and terrestrial facilities using
the FY 2008 revenue requirement as its
basis.9 Since we do not have any
additional information that would lead
us to change this allocation percentage
for FY 2010, we propose to continue to
use the allocation percentages of 87.6
percent (submarine cable) and 12.4
percent (satellite and terrestrial) for
calculating FY 2010 submarine cable
regulatory fees. Consistent with the
Commission’s annual process of
updating its schedule of regulatory fees
with recent data, however, we reserve
the right to re-examine the allocation
percentages described above on an
annual basis.
beginning in FY 2010. Beginning in FY
2010, we will collect annual regulatory
fees from all digital full-service
television stations, and the ‘‘digitalonly’’ exemption will no longer be
applicable. Also, because this is the first
year following the Commission’s
transition to digital full service
television, it is possible that some
facilities may be operating under a
Special Temporary Authority (STA)
beginning on October 1, 2009 until the
digital license is issued. For FY 2010
regulatory fee purposes, these facilities
operating under an STA will be
considered to be fully operational
licensed facilities and will be obligated
to pay the same regulatory fee as a
licensed full-service television station.
C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital
Low Power, Class A, and TV
Translators/Boosters
8. Although the digital transition of
full-service television stations was
completed on June 12, 2009, the digital
transition for Low Power, Class A, and
TV Translators/Boosters is still
voluntary, and there is currently no set
date for the completion of this
transition. Historically, the discussion
of digital transition conversion with
respect to regulatory fees has applied
only to full-service television stations,
and therefore, the elimination of the
‘‘digital only’’ exemption described in
the above paragraph has no impact on
this class of regulatees. Because the
digital transition in the Low Power,
Class A, and TV Translators/Booster
facilities is voluntary and the transition
will occur over a period time, it is
possible that some facilities will convert
from analog to digital more quickly than
B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital others. During this interim transition
Full Service Television Broadcasters
period, licensees of Low Power, Class A,
and TV Translator/Booster facilities
7. In our FY 2009 Report and Order,
could be operating in analog mode, in
we stated that, beginning in FY 2010,
digital mode, or in an analog and digital
we plan to collect regulatory fees from
simulcast mode. For regulatory fee
digital broadcasters, and we sought
purposes, a fee will be assessed for each
comment on this plan to collect
facility operating either in an analog or
regulatory fees on full-power digital
digital mode. In instances in which a
broadcast stations beginning with FY
2010, i.e., the fiscal year after the nation- licensee is operating in both an analog
wide transition date on June 12, 2009.10 and digital mode as a simulcast, a single
regulatory fee will be assessed for this
Since the digital transition on June 12,
analog facility that has a digital
2009 has eliminated the distinction
companion channel. As greater numbers
between digital and analog full-service
of facilities convert to digital mode, the
television stations, the digital-only
Commission will provide revised
exemption will no longer apply
instructions on how regulatory fees will
6 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory
be assessed.
Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order,
24 FCC Rcd 4208, para. 1 (March 24, 2009)
(‘‘Submarine Cable Order’’).
7 See FY 2009 Report and Order at Appendix B.
8 See Submarine Cable Order at paragraphs 1 and
6.
9 Id. at 6.
10 Id. at para. 13.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service
Messaging Service
9. Commercial Mobile Radio Service
(‘‘CMRS’’) Messaging Service, which
replaced the CMRS One-Way Paging fee
category in 1997, includes all
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
narrowband services.11 Since 1997, the
number of subscribers has declined
from 40.8 million to 6.5 million, and
there does not appear to be any sign of
recovery to the subscriber levels of
1997–1999. Maintaining the fee at the
existing level of $.08 per subscriber is
the minimum reasonable and
appropriate action to take under the
prevailing circumstances in the paging
industry. We propose in FY 2010 to
continue maintaining the regulatory fee
rate at $0.08 per subscriber due to the
declining subscriber base in this
industry.12 We seek comment on this
proposal.
E. Administrative and Operational
Issues
10. In FY 2009, the Commission
implemented several changes in
procedures which simplified the
payment and reconciliation processes of
FY 2009 regulatory fees. These changes
proved to be very helpful to both
licensees and to the Commission, and
we propose in the following paragraphs
to expand upon these improvements. In
FY 2010, the Commission will promote
greater use of technology (and less use
of paper) to improve the regulatory fee
notification and collection process. We
seek general comment on ways to
promote greater use of technology in
collecting regulatory fees.
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer
11. In FY 2009, we instituted a
mandatory filing requirement using the
Commission’s electronic filing and
payment system (also known as ‘‘Fee
Filer’’).13 Licensees filing their annual
regulatory fee payments were required
to begin the process by entering the
Commission’s Fee Filer system with a
valid FRN and password. This change
was beneficial to both licensees and to
the Commission. For example, for
licensees, the mandatory use of Fee
Filer eliminated the need to manually
complete and submit a hardcopy Form
159, and for the Commission, the data
in electronic format made it much easier
to process payments more efficiently
and effectively. Because of the success
of this process change, we propose to
continue to make the use of Fee Filer for
filing annual regulatory fees mandatory.
We seek comment on this proposal. As
11 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory
Fees for Fiscal Year 1997, MD Docket No. 96–186,
Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17161, 17184–85,
para. 60 (1997) (‘‘FY 1997 Report and Order’’).
12 Between FY 1997 and FY 2009, the subscriber
base in the paging industry declined 84 percent
from 40.8 million to 6.5 million subscribers,
according to FY 2009 collections data as of
September 30, 2009.
13 FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 20 and
21.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
in FY 2009, the mandatory use of Fee
Filer does not mean that licensees are
expected to pay only through Fee
Filer—it is only mandatory for licensees
to begin the process of filing their
annual regulatory fees using Fee Filer.
This is one reason it is very important
for licensees to have a current and valid
FRN address on file in the
Commission’s Registration System
(CORES). Going forward, only Form
159–E documents generated from Fee
Filer will be permitted when sending in
a regulatory fee payment to U.S. Bank.
These Form 159–E’s not only will
reduce errors resulting from illegible
handwriting on hardcopy Form 159’s,
but, because they are generated from Fee
Filer, these forms also will create an
electronic record of licensee payment
attributes that are more easily tracked
and searched than hardcopy Form 159’s
that are completed manually and mailed
to the Commission.
2. Notification and Collection of
Regulatory Fees
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
a. Pre-bills
12. In prior years, the Commission
mailed pre-bills via surface mail to
licensees in select regulatory fee
categories: Interstate
telecommunications service providers
(‘‘ITSPs’’), Geostationary (‘‘GSO’’) and
Non-Geostationary (‘‘NGSO’’) satellite
space station licensees,14 holders of
Cable Television Relay Service (‘‘CARS’’)
licenses, and Earth Station licensees.15
The remaining regulatees did not
receive pre-bills. In our FY 2009 Report
and Order, the Commission decided to
have the attributes of these pre-bills
viewed in Fee Filer, rather than mailing
pre-bills out to licensees via surface
mail.16 Although the overall response to
14 Geostationary orbit space station (‘‘GSO’’)
licensees received regulatory fee pre-bills for
satellites that (1) were licensed by the Commission
and operational on or before October 1 of the
respective fiscal year; and (2) were not co-located
with and technically identical to another
operational satellite on that date (i.e., were not
functioning as a spare satellite). Non-geostationary
orbit space station (‘‘NGSO’’) licensees received
regulatory fee pre-bills for systems that were
licensed by the Commission and operational on or
before October 1 of the respective fiscal year.
15 An assessment is a proposed statement of the
amount of regulatory fees owed by an entity to the
Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be
ascribed for purposes of setting the entity’s
regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the
Commission’s accounting system as a current debt.
A pre-bill is considered an account receivable in the
Commission’s accounting system. Pre-bills reflect
the amount owed and have a payment due date of
the last day of the regulatory fee payment window.
Consequently, if a pre-bill is not paid by the due
date, it becomes delinquent and is subject to our
debt collection procedures. See also 47 CFR
1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
16 See FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs
24, 26.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
this procedural change was positive, it
was apparent that a greater effort should
have been made to inform licensees that
they would not be receiving a hardcopy
regulatory fee bill in the mail. In FY
2010, the Commission will continue to
reduce its use of hardcopy documents
by not mailing out annual regulatory fee
bills, but the Commission is seeking to
increase its efforts in notifying licensees
that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will
not be mailed out. We seek comment on
how to most efficiently and effectively
notify licensees that hardcopy
regulatory fee bills will not be mailed
out, but that, instead, the amount and
attributes of the bills will be available in
Fee Filer for review.
II. Procedural Matters
13. Included below are procedural
items as well as our current payment
and collection methods, which we have
revised over the past several years to
expedite the processing of regulatory fee
payments. We include these payments
and collection procedures here as a
useful way of reminding regulatory fee
payers and the public about these
aspects of the annual regulatory fee
collection process.
A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets
14. Each year we post public notices
and fact sheets pertaining to regulatory
fees on our Web site. These documents
contain information about the payment
due date and the regulatory fee payment
procedures. We will continue to post
this information on https://www.fcc.gov/
fees/regfees.html, but as in previous
years we will not send out public
notices and fact sheets to regulatees en
masse.
B. Assessment Notifications
1. Media Services Licensees
15. Beginning in FY 2003, we sent fee
assessment notifications via surface
mail to media services entities on a perfacility basis.17 The notifications
provided the assessed fee amount for
the facility in question, as well as the
data attributes that determined the fee
amount. We have since refined this
initiative with improved results.18
17 As stated previously at footnote 41, an
assessment is a proposed statement of the amount
of regulatory fees owed by an entity to the
Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be
ascribed for purposes of setting the entity’s
regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the
Commission’s accounting system as a current debt.
18 Some of those refinements have been to
provide licensees with a Commission-authorized
Web site to update or correct any information
concerning their facilities, and to amend their feeexempt status, if need be. Also, our notifications
now provide licensees with a telephone number to
call in the event that they need customer assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21539
Consistent with procedures used last
year, we will mail out media assessment
notifications to licensees in FY 2010 at
their primary record of contact
populated in our Consolidated Database
System (‘‘CDBS’’), and to a secondary
record of contact, if available.19
However, after FY 2010, as part of the
Commission’s initiative to emphasize
electronic filing and reduce paper usage,
the Commission will stop mailing out
media notification assessments to media
licensees. Instead the Commission will
rely more on its various Web sites,
including the Commission-authorized
Web site at https://www.fccfees.com, to
notify licensees of pending annual
regulatory fees and to update or correct
any information regarding their facilities
and their fee-exempt status.20 We seek
comment on our proposal to
discontinue sending out media
notification letters after the FY 2010
regulatory fee season.
16. The decision to discontinue
mailing media notifications beginning
in FY 2011 is consistent with the
Commission’s effort to become more
electronic and less paper-oriented.
However, the Commission understands
that not all media licensees are able to
access the Commission’s various
electronic Web sites once the hardcopy
notification letters are discontinued in
FY 2011. Therefore, to be receptive to
the needs of these licensees, the
Commission will leave the comment
and reply comment period open until
September 30, 2010 on the specific issue
of whether the media notification letters
should be discontinued in FY 2011.
Because this decision does not impact
FY 2010 regulatory fees, we will be
addressing this issue in the
Commission’s FY 2011 Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking after we have had
the chance to review the various
The notifications themselves have been refined so
that licensees of fewer than four facilities receive
individual fee assessment postcards for their
facilities; whereas licensees of four or more
facilities now receive a single assessment letter that
lists all of their facilities and the associated
regulatory fee obligation for each facility.
19 We will issue fee assessments for AM and FM
Radio Stations, AM and FM Construction Permits,
FM Translators/Boosters, VHF and UHF Television
Stations, VHF and UHF Television Construction
Permits, Satellite Television Stations, Low Power
Television (‘‘LPTV’’) Stations and LPTV Translators/
Boosters, to the extent that applicants, permittees
and licensees of such facilities do not qualify as
government entities or non-profit entities. As in
prior years, fee assessments will not be issued for
broadcast auxiliary stations.
20 If there is a change of address for the facility,
it is the licensee’s responsibility to make the
address change in the Media Bureau’s CDBS
system, as well as in the Commission’s Registration
System (‘‘CORES’’). There is also a Commissionauthorized Web site that media services licensees
can use to view and update their exempt status
(https://www.fccfees.com).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21540
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
comments and reply comments that
have been submitted. In addition to
raising this issue in this document, the
Commission will also remind media
licensees of this proposed change in
notification procedures when it sends
out letters to media licensees later in the
fiscal year regarding their FY 2010
regulatory fee obligations. To ensure
that the comments of all potentially
affected persons are properly included
in the record, media licensees should
submit their comments and reply
comments on this issue as follows:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
• Effective December 28, 2009, all
hand-delivered or messenger-delivered
paper filings for the Commission’s
Secretary must be delivered to FCC
Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room
TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
17. Although the Commission will
mail media assessment notifications to
licensees in FY 2010, all licensees
(including media services) will be
required to use Fee Filer as the first step
in paying their regulatory fee
obligations. The notification
assessments provide licensees with the
same media data attributes found on Fee
Filer; however, receiving this
information in FY 2010 via mail
notification does not obviate, nor should
it be considered a substitute for, using
Fee Filer as the first step in filing and
paying annual regulatory fees. As
explained previously, licensees must
first log onto the Commission’s Fee Filer
system to begin the process of filing and
paying their regulatory fees, but once in
Fee Filer, licensees may pay by check or
money order, credit card, or wire
transfer. A Form 159–E generated from
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Fee Filer is required, even when mailing
in the annual regulatory fee payment.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services
Assessments
18. As we have done in prior years,
we will mail an initial assessment letter
to Commercial Mobile Radio Service
(CMRS) providers using data from the
Numbering Resource Utilization
Forecast (‘‘NRUF’’) report that is based
on ‘‘assigned’’ number counts that have
been adjusted for porting to net Type 0
ports (‘‘in’’ and ‘‘out’’).21 The letter will
include a listing of the carrier’s
Operating Company Numbers (‘‘OCNs’’)
upon which the assessment is based.22
The letters will not include OCNs with
their respective assigned number
counts, but rather, an aggregate total of
assigned numbers for each carrier.
19. If the carrier does not agree with
the number of subscribers listed on the
initial assessment letter, providers will
have an opportunity within a specific
timeframe to revise their subscriber
counts by submitting supporting
documentation to substantiate the
change. However, instead of mailing the
revised figures, providers will be asked
to access Fee Filer and follow the
instructions provided in order to submit
their revised subscriber count along
with any supporting documentation.23
The Commission will then review the
revised count and supporting
documentation and either approve or
disapprove the submission in Fee Filer.
The provider will be able to review the
decision online in Fee Filer. If the
submission is disapproved, the
Commission will also attempt to contact
the provider so that the provider will
have an opportunity to discuss its
revised subscriber count and/or provide
additional supporting documentation. If
we receive no response or correction to
the initial assessment letter, or we do
not reverse the disapproval of the
provider’s revised count submission, we
will expect the fee payment to be based
on the number of subscribers listed on
the initial assessment. Once the
timeframe for revision has passed, the
subscriber counts will be finalized.
These subscriber counts will then be the
basis upon which CMRS regulatory fees
will be expected. Providers will be able
21 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory
Fees for Fiscal Year 2005 and Assessment and
Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2004,
MD Docket Nos. 05–59 and 04–73, Report and
Order and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd
12259, 12264, paragraphs 38–44 (2005).
22 Id.
23 In the supporting documentation, the provider
will need to state a reason for the change, such as
a purchase or sale of a subsidiary, the date of the
transaction, and any other pertinent information
that will help to justify a reason for the change.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to view their final subscriber counts
online in Fee Filer. A final CMRS
assessment letter will not be mailed out.
20. Because some carriers do not file
the NRUF report, they may not receive
an initial letter of assessment. In these
instances, the carriers should compute
their fee payment using the standard
methodology 24 that is currently in place
for CMRS Wireless services (e.g.,
compute their subscriber counts as of
December 31, 2009), and submit their
fee payment accordingly. Whether a
carrier receives an assessment letter or
not, the Commission reserves the right
to audit the number of subscribers for
which regulatory fees are paid. In the
event that the Commission determines
that the number of subscribers paid is
inaccurate, the Commission will bill the
carrier for the difference between what
was paid and what should have been
paid.
C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment
Process
1. Cable Television Subscribers
21. We will continue to permit cable
television operators to base their
regulatory fee payment on their
company’s aggregate year-end
subscriber count, rather than requiring
them to sub-report subscriber counts on
a per community unit identifier
(‘‘CUID’’) basis.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers
22. In FY 2006, we streamlined the
CMRS payment process by eliminating
the requirement for CMRS providers to
identify their individual call signs when
making their regulatory fee payment,
instead allowing CMRS providers to pay
their regulatory fees only at the
aggregate subscriber level without
having to identify their various call
signs.25 We will continue this practice
in FY 2010. In FY 2007, we
consolidated the CMRS cellular and
CMRS mobile fee categories into one fee
category with a single fee code, thereby
eliminating the requirement for CMRS
providers to separate their subscriber
counts into CMRS cellular and CMRS
mobile fee categories during the
regulatory fee payment process. This
consolidation of fee categories enabled
the Commission to process payments
more quickly and accurately. For FY
2010, we will continue this practice of
combining the CMRS cellular and
24 See, e.g., Federal Communications
Commission, Regulatory Fees Fact Sheet: What You
Owe—Commercial Wireless Services for FY 2009 at
1 (rel. September 2009).
25 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory
Fees for Fiscal Year 2006, MD Docket No. 06–68,
Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 8092, 8105, para. 48
(2006).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
CMRS mobile fee categories into one
regulatory fee category.
due, is less than $10 are exempted from
payment of FY 2010 regulatory fees.
3. Interstate Telecommunications
Service Providers (‘‘ITSP’’)
4. Standard Fee Calculations and
Payment Dates
27. The Commission will accept fee
payments made in advance of the
window for the payment of regulatory
fees. The responsibility for payment of
fees by service category is as follows:
• Media Services: Regulatory fees
must be paid for initial construction
permits (including construction permits
for digital television stations) that were
granted on or before October 1, 2009 for
AM/FM radio stations, analog VHF/UHF
full service television stations, and
satellite television stations. Regulatory
fees must be paid for all broadcast
facility licenses granted on or before
October 1, 2009. In instances where a
permit or license is transferred or
assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the
holder of the permit or license as of the
fee due date.
• Wireline (Common Carrier)
Services: Regulatory fees must be paid
for authorizations that were granted on
or before October 1, 2009. In instances
where a permit or license is transferred
or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the
holder of the permit or license as of the
fee due date. We note that audio
bridging service providers are included
in this category.26
• Wireless Services: CMRS cellular,
mobile, and messaging services (fees
based on number of subscribers or
telephone number count): Regulatory
fees must be paid for authorizations that
were granted on or before October 1,
2009. The number of subscribers, units,
or telephone numbers on December 31,
2009 will be used as the basis from
which to calculate the fee payment. In
instances where a permit or license is
transferred or assigned after October 1,
2009, responsibility for payment rests
with the holder of the permit or license
as of the fee due date.
• The first eleven regulatory fee
categories in our Schedule of Regulatory
Fees (see Appendix B) pay ‘‘small multiyear wireless regulatory fees.’’ Entities
pay these regulatory fees in advance for
23. In FY 2007, we adopted a proposal
to round lines 14 (total subject
revenues) and 16 (total regulatory fee
owed) on FCC Form 159–W to the
nearest dollar. This revision enabled the
Commission to process the ITSP
regulatory fee payments more quickly
because rounding was performed in a
consistent manner and eliminated
processing issues that occurred in prior
years. In FY 2010, we will continue
rounding lines 14 and 16 when
calculating the FY 2010 ITSP fee
obligation. In addition, as in FY 2009,
we will continue the practice of not
mailing out Form 159–W via surface
mail.
D. Payment of Regulatory Fees
1. Lock Box Bank
24. All lock box payments to the
Commission for FY 2010 will be
processed by U.S. Bank, St. Louis,
Missouri, and payable to the FCC.
During the regulatory fee season, for
those licensees paying by check, money
order, or by credit card using Form 159–
E remittance advice, the fee payment
and Form 159–E remittance advice
should be mailed to the following
address: Federal Communications
Commission, Regulatory Fees, P.O. Box
979084, St. Louis, MO 63197–9000.
Additional payment options and
instructions are posted at https://
www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments
25. The receiving bank for all wire
payments is the Federal Reserve Bank,
New York, New York (TREAS NYC).
When making a wire transfer, regulatees
must fax a copy of their Fee Filer
generated Form 159–E to U.S. Bank, St.
Louis, Missouri at (314) 418–4232 at
least one hour before initiating the wire
transfer (but on the same business day),
so as to not delay crediting their
account. Regulatees should discuss
arrangements (including bank closing
schedules) with their bankers several
days before they plan to make the wire
transfer to allow sufficient time for the
transfer to be initiated and completed
before the deadline. Complete
instructions for making wire payments
are posted at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/
wiretran.html.
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees
26. Regulatees whose total FY 2010
regulatory fee liability, including all
categories of fees for which payment is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
26 Audio bridging services are toll
teleconferencing services, and audio bridging
service providers are required to contribute directly
to the universal service fund based on revenues
from these services. On June 30, 2008, the
Commission released the InterCall Order, in which
the Commission stated that InterCall, Inc. and all
similarly situated audio bridging service providers
are required to contribute directly to the universal
service fund. See Request for Review by InterCall,
Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator,
CC Docket No. 96–45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10731
(2008) (‘‘InterCall Order’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21541
the entire amount of their five-year or
ten-year term of initial license, and only
pay regulatory fees again when the
license is renewed or a new license is
obtained. We include these fee
categories in our Schedule of Regulatory
Fees to publicize our estimates of the
number of ‘‘small multi-year wireless’’
licenses that will be renewed or newly
obtained in FY 2010.
• Multichannel Video Programming
Distributor Services (cable television
operators and CARS licensees):
Regulatory fees must be paid for the
number of basic cable television
subscribers as of December 31, 2009.27
Regulatory fees also must be paid for
CARS licenses that were granted on or
before October 1, 2009. In instances
where a permit or license is transferred
or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the
holder of the permit or license as of the
fee due date.
• International Services: Regulatory
fees must be paid for earth stations,
geostationary orbit space stations and
non-geostationary orbit satellite systems
that were licensed and operational on or
before October 1, 2009. In instances
where a permit or license is transferred
or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the
holder of the permit or license as of the
fee due date.
• International Services: Submarine
Cable Systems: Regulatory fees for
submarine cable systems are to be paid
on a per cable landing license basis
based on circuit capacity as of December
31, 2009. In instances where a license is
transferred or assigned after October 1,
2009, responsibility for payment rests
with the holder of the license as of the
fee due date.
• International Services: Terestrial
and Satellite Services: Finally,
regulatory fees for International Bearer
Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based
common carriers that have active (used
or leased) international bearer circuits
as of December 31, 2009 in any
terrestrial or satellite transmission
facility for the provision of service to an
end user or resale carrier, which
includes active circuits to themselves or
to their affiliates. In addition, noncommon carrier satellite operators must
27 Cable television system operators should
compute their basic subscribers as follows: Number
of single family dwellings + number of individual
households in multiple dwelling unit (apartments,
condominiums, mobile home parks, etc.) paying at
the basic subscriber rate + bulk rate customers +
courtesy and free service. Note: Bulk-Rate
Customers = Total annual bulk-rate charge divided
by basic annual subscription rate for individual
households. Operators may base their count on ‘‘a
typical day in the last full week’’ of December 2009,
rather than on a count as of December 31, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21542
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
pay a fee for each circuit sold or leased
to any customer, including themselves
or their affiliates, other than an
international common carrier
authorized by the Commission to
provide U.S. international common
carrier services. ‘‘Active circuits’’ for
these purposes include backup and
redundant circuits as of December 31,
2009. Whether circuits are used
specifically for voice or data is not
relevant for these purposes in
determining that they are active circuits.
In instances where a permit or license
is transferred or assigned after October
1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests
with the holder of the permit or license
as of the fee due date.
E. Enforcement
28. To be considered timely,
regulatory fee payments must be
received and stamped at the lockbox
bank by the last day of the regulatory fee
filing window. Section 9(c) of the Act
requires us to impose an additional
charge as a penalty for late payment of
any regulatory fee.28 A late payment
penalty of 25 percent of the unpaid
amount of the required regulatory fee
will be assessed on the first day
following the deadline date for filing of
these fees. Failure to pay regulatory fees
and/or any late penalty will subject
regulatees to sanctions, including those
set forth in section 1.1910 of the
Commission’s rules 29 and in the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996
(‘‘DCIA’’).30 We also assess
administrative processing charges on
delinquent debts to recover additional
costs incurred in processing and
handling the related debt pursuant to
the DCIA and section 1.1940(d) of the
Commission’s rules.31 These
administrative processing charges will
be assessed on any delinquent
regulatory fee, in addition to the 25
percent late charge penalty. In case of
partial payments (underpayments) of
regulatory fees, the licensee will be
given credit for the amount paid, but if
it is later determined that the fee paid
is incorrect or not timely paid, then the
25 percent late charge penalty (and
other charges and/or sanctions, as
appropriate) will be assessed on the
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
28 47
U.S.C. 159(c).
47 CFR 1.1910.
30 Delinquent debt owed to the Commission
triggers application of the ‘‘red light rule’’ which
requires offsets or holds on pending disbursements.
47 CFR 1.1910. In 2004, the Commission adopted
rules implementing the requirements of the DCIA.
See Amendment of Parts 0 and 1 of the
Commission’s Rules, MD Docket No. 02–339, Report
and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6540 (2004); 47 CFR part
1, subpart O, Collection of Claims Owed the United
States.
31 47 CFR 1.1940(d).
29 See
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
portion that is not paid in a timely
manner.
29. We will withhold action on any
applications or other requests for
benefits filed by anyone who is
delinquent in any non-tax debts owed to
the Commission (including regulatory
fees) and will ultimately dismiss those
applications or other requests if
payment of the delinquent debt or other
satisfactory arrangement for payment is
not made.32 Failure to pay regulatory
fees can also result in the initiation of
a proceeding to revoke any and all
authorizations held by the entity
responsible for paying the delinquent
fee(s).
F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
30. An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) is contained in
Appendix E. Comments to the IRFA
must be identified as responses to the
IRFA and filed by the deadlines for
comments on the Notice. The
Commission will send a copy of the
Notice, including the IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
31. This Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking does not contain proposed
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’), Public Law 104–13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees,
pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506 (c) (4).
Completion of the 159 family of forms
required by the Commission’s regulatory
fee payment process is already approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget under information collections
3060–0589 and 3060–0949.
H. Congressional Review Act Analysis
32. The Commission will send a copy
of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act.33
I. Ex Parte Rules
33. This is as a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’
proceeding subject to the requirements
under section 1.1206(b) of the
32 See
47 CFR 1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Congressional
Review Act is contained in Title II, 251, of the
CWAAA; see Public Law 104–121, Title II, 251, 110
Stat. 868.
Commission’s rules.34 Ex parte
presentations are permissible if
disclosed in accordance with
Commission rules, except during the
Sunshine Agenda period when
presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are
generally prohibited. Persons making
oral ex parte presentations are reminded
that a memorandum summarizing a
presentation must contain a summary of
the substance of the presentation and
not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one- or twosentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required.35 Additional rules pertaining
to oral and written presentations are set
forth in section 1.1206(b).
J. Filing Requirements
34. Comments and Replies. Pursuant
to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
35. Electronic Filers: Comments may
be filed electronically using the Internet
by accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
36. Paper Filers: Parties who choose
to file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
• Effective December 28, 2009, all
hand-delivered or messenger-delivered
paper filings for the Commission’s
Secretary must be delivered to FCC
Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room
TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
33 See
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34 See 47 CFR 1.1206(b); see also 47 CFR 1.1202,
1.1203.
35 See 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
People With Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
37. Availability of Documents.
Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. These
documents will also be available free
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
online, via ECFS. Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII, Word,
and/or Adobe Acrobat.
38. Accessibility Information. To
request information in accessible
formats (computer diskettes, large print,
audio recording, and Braille), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document can also be
downloaded in Word and Portable
Document Format (‘‘PDF’’) at: https://
www.fcc.gov.
III. Ordering Clauses
39. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 9, and
303(r) of the Communications Act of
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21543
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is hereby
adopted.
40. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis in Appendix E, to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
U.S. Small Business Administration.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.000
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21544
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21545
EP26AP10.001
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.002
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21546
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21547
EP26AP10.003
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.004
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21548
21549
BILLING CODE 6712–01–C
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.005
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
21550
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Appendix C
Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY
2010
In order to calculate individual service fees
for FY 2010, we adjusted FY 2009 payment
units for each service to more accurately
reflect expected FY 2010 payment liabilities.
We obtained our updated estimates through
a variety of means. For example, we used
Commission licensee data bases, actual prior
year payment records and industry and trade
association projections when available. The
databases we consulted include our
Universal Licensing System (‘‘ULS’’),
International Bureau Filing System (‘‘IBFS’’),
Consolidated Database System (‘‘CDBS’’) and
Cable Operations and Licensing System
(‘‘COALS’’), as well as reports generated
within the Commission such as the Wireline
Competition Bureau’s Trends in Telephone
Service and the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau’s Numbering
Resource Utilization Forecast.
We sought verification for these estimates
from multiple sources and, in all cases we
compared FY 2010 estimates with actual FY
2009 payment units to ensure that our
revised estimates were reasonable. Where
appropriate, we adjusted and/or rounded our
final estimates to take into consideration the
fact that certain variables that impact on the
number of payment units cannot yet be
estimated with sufficient accuracy. These
include an unknown number of waivers and/
or exemptions that may occur in FY 2010 and
the fact that, in many services, the number
of actual licensees or station operators
fluctuates from time to time due to economic,
technical, or other reasons. When we note,
for example, that our estimated FY 2010
payment units are based on FY 2009 actual
payment units, it does not necessarily mean
that our FY 2010 projection is exactly the
same number as FY 2009. We have either
rounded the FY 2010 number or adjusted it
slightly to account for these variables.
Fee category
Sources of payment unit estimates
Land Mobile (All), Microwave, 218–219 MHz,
Marine (Ship & Coast), Aviation (Aircraft &
Ground), GMRS, Amateur Vanity Call Signs,
Domestic Public Fixed.
CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services .........................
CMRS Messaging Services ................................
AM/FM Radio Stations ........................................
UHF/VHF Television Stations .............................
AM/FM/TV Construction Permits ........................
LPTV, Translators and Boosters, Class A Television.
Broadcast Auxiliaries ..........................................
BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS) ...............................
LMDS ..................................................................
Cable Television Relay Service (‘‘CARS’’) Stations.
Cable Television System Subscribers ................
Based on Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (‘‘WTB’’) projections of new applications and
renewals taking into consideration existing Commission licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft) and Marine (Ship) estimates have been adjusted to take into consideration the licensing of portions of these services on a voluntary basis.
Based on WTB projection reports, and FY 09 payment data.
Based on WTB reports, and FY 09 payment data.
Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Interstate Telecommunication Service Providers
Earth Stations .....................................................
Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs) .....................
International Bearer Circuits ...............................
Submarine Cable Licenses .................................
Appendix D
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Factors, Measurements, and Calculations
That Go Into Determining Station Signal
Contours and Associated Population
Coverages
AM Stations
For stations with nondirectional daytime
antennas, the theoretical radiation was used
at all azimuths. For stations with directional
daytime antennas, specific information on
each day tower, including field ratio,
phasing, spacing and orientation was
retrieved, as well as the theoretical pattern
root-mean-square of the radiation in all
directions in the horizontal plane (‘‘RMS’’)
figure milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @ 1 km)
for the antenna system. The standard, or
modified standard if pertinent, horizontal
plane radiation pattern was calculated using
techniques and methods specified in 73.150
and 73.152 of the Commission’s rules.1
Radiation values were calculated for each of
360 radials around the transmitter site. Next,
estimated soil conductivity data was
retrieved from a database representing the
1 47
CFR 73.150 and 73.152.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Based
Based
Based
Based
on
on
on
on
actual FY 2009 payment units.
WTB reports and actual FY 2009 payment units.
WTB reports and actual FY 2009 payment units.
data from Media Bureau’s COALS data base and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on publicly available data sources for estimated subscriber counts and actual FY 2009
payment units.
Based on FCC Form 499–Q data for the four quarters of calendar year 2009, the Wireline
Competition Bureau projected the amount of calendar year 2009 revenue that will be reported on 2010 FCC Form 499–A worksheets in April 2010.
Based on International Bureau (‘‘IB’’) licensing data and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on IB data reports and actual FY 2009 payment units.
Based on IB reports and submissions by licensees.
Based on IB license information.
information in FCC Figure R3.2 Using the
calculated horizontal radiation values, and
the retrieved soil conductivity data, the
distance to the principal community (5 mV/
m) contour was predicted for each of the 360
radials. The resulting distance to principal
community contours were used to form a
geographical polygon. Population counting
was accomplished by determining which
2,000 block centroids were contained in the
polygon. (A block centroid is the center point
of a small area containing population as
computed by the U.S. Census Bureau.) The
sum of the population figures for all enclosed
blocks represents the total population for the
predicted principal community coverage
area.
FM Stations
The greater of the horizontal or vertical
effective radiated power (‘‘ERP’’) (kW) and
respective height above average terrain
(‘‘HAAT’’) (m) combination was used. Where
the antenna height above mean sea level
(‘‘HAMSL’’) was available, it was used in lieu
of the average HAAT figure to calculate
2 See Map of Estimated Effective Ground
Conductivity in the United States, 47 CFR 73.190
Figure R3.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
specific HAAT figures for each of 360 radials
under study. Any available directional
pattern information was applied as well, to
produce a radial-specific ERP figure. The
HAAT and ERP figures were used in
conjunction with the Field Strength (50–50)
propagation curves specified in 47 CFR
73.313 of the Commission’s rules to predict
the distance to the principal community (70
dBu (decibel above 1 microVolt per meter) or
3.17 mV/m) contour for each of the 360
radials.3 The resulting distance to principal
community contours were used to form a
geographical polygon. Population counting
was accomplished by determining which
2,000 block centroids were contained in the
polygon. The sum of the population figures
for all enclosed blocks represents the total
population for the predicted principal
community coverage area.
3 47
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
CFR 73.313.
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Appendix E
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (‘‘RFA’’),36 the Commission prepared this
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(‘‘IRFA’’) of the possible significant economic
impact on small entities by the policies and
rules proposed in this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. Written public comments are
requested on this IRFA. Comments must be
identified as responses to the IRFA and must
be filed on or before the dates indicated on
the first page of this Notice. The Commission
will send a copy of the Notice, including the
IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.37 In
addition, the Notice and IRFA (or summaries
thereof) will be published in the Federal
Register.38
I. Need for, and Objectives of, the Notice
2. This rulemaking proceeding is initiated
for the Commission to obtain comments
regarding its proposed amendment to its
Schedule of Regulatory Fees in the amount
of $335,794,000, which is the amount that
Congress has required the Commission to
recover. The Commission seeks to collect the
necessary amount through its revised
Schedule of Regulatory Fees in the most
efficient manner possible and without undue
public burden.
II. Legal Basis
3. This action, including publication of
proposed rules, is authorized under sections
(4)(i) and (j), 9, and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended.39
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Rules Will
Apply
4. The RFA directs agencies to provide a
description of, and where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small entities that
may be affected by the proposed rules and
policies, if adopted.40 The RFA generally
defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the
same meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ 41 In addition, the
term ‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’ under
the Small Business Act.42 A ‘‘small business
36 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601–612 has
been amended by the Contract With America
Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law 104–121,
110 Stat. 847 (1996) (‘‘CWAAA’’). Title II of the
CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (‘‘SBREFA’’).
37 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
38 Id.
39 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 159, and 303(r).
40 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
41 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
42 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the
definition of ‘‘small-business concern’’ in the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
601(3), the statutory definition of a small business
applies ‘‘unless an agency, after consultation with
the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration and after opportunity for public
comment, establishes one or more definitions of
such term which are appropriate to the activities of
the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the
Federal Register.’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
concern’’ is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in
its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the SBA.43
5. Small Businesses. Nationwide, there are
a total of approximately 29.6 million small
businesses, according to the SBA.44
6. Small Organizations. Nationwide, as of
2002, there are approximately 1.6 million
small organizations.45 A ‘‘small organization’’
is generally ‘‘any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field.’’ 46
7. Small Governmental Jurisdictions. The
term ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ is
defined generally as ‘‘governments of cities,
towns, townships, villages, school districts,
or special districts, with a population of less
than fifty thousand.’’ 47 Census Bureau data
for 2002 indicate that there were 87,525 local
governmental jurisdictions in the United
States.48 We estimate that, of this total,
84,377 entities were ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions.’’ 49 Thus, we estimate that most
governmental jurisdictions are small.
8. We have included small incumbent local
exchange carriers in this present RFA
analysis. As noted above, a ‘‘small business’’
under the RFA is one that, inter alia, meets
the pertinent small business size standard
(e.g., a telephone communications business
having 1,500 or fewer employees), and ‘‘is not
dominant in its field of operation.’’ 50 The
SBA’s Office of Advocacy contends that, for
RFA purposes, small incumbent local
exchange carriers are not dominant in their
field of operation because any such
dominance is not ‘‘national’’ in scope.51 We
have therefore included small incumbent
local exchange carriers in this RFA analysis,
although we emphasize that this RFA action
has no effect on Commission analyses and
determinations in other, non-RFA contexts.
9. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers
(‘‘ILECs’’). Neither the Commission nor the
SBA has developed a small business size
standard specifically for incumbent local
exchange services. The appropriate size
43 15
U.S.C. 632.
SBA, Office of Advocacy, ‘‘Frequently
Asked Questions,’’ https://web.sba.gov/faqs
(accessed Jan. 2009).
45 Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit
Almanac & Desk Reference (2002).
46 5 U.S.C. 601(4).
47 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
48 U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the
United States: 2006, section 8, p. 272, Table 415.
49 We assume that the villages, school districts,
and special districts are small, and total 48,558. See
U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the
United States: 2006, section 8, p. 273, Table 417.
For 2002, Census Bureau data indicate that the total
number of county, municipal, and township
governments nationwide was 38,967, of which
35,819 were small. Id.
50 15 U.S.C. 632.
51 Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for
Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman,
FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act
contains a definition of ‘‘small-business concern,’’
which the RFA incorporates into its own definition
of ‘‘small business.’’ See 15 U.S.C. 632(a) (‘‘Small
Business Act’’); 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (‘‘RFA’’). SBA
regulations interpret ‘‘small business concern’’ to
include the concept of dominance on a national
basis. See 13 CFR 121.102(b).
44 See
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21551
standard under SBA rules is for the category
Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under
that size standard, such a business is small
if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.52
According to Commission data,53 1,311
carriers have reported that they are engaged
in the provision of incumbent local exchange
services. Of these 1,311 carriers, an estimated
1,024 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 287
have more than 1,500 employees.
Consequently, the Commission estimates that
most providers of incumbent local exchange
service are small businesses that may be
affected by our proposed action.
10. Competitive Local Exchange Carriers
(‘‘CLECs’’), Competitive Access Providers
(‘‘CAPs’’), ‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’
and ‘‘Other Local Service Providers.’’ Neither
the Commission nor the SBA has developed
a small business size standard specifically for
these service providers. The appropriate size
standard under SBA rules is for the category
Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under
that size standard, such a business is small
if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.54
According to Commission data,55 1005
carriers have reported that they are engaged
in the provision of either competitive access
provider services or competitive local
exchange carrier services. Of these 1005
carriers, an estimated 918 have 1,500 or
fewer employees and 87 have more than
1,500 employees. In addition, 16 carriers
have reported that they are ‘‘Shared-Tenant
Service Providers,’’ and all 16 are estimated
to have 1,500 or fewer employees. In
addition, 89 carriers have reported that they
are ‘‘Other Local Service Providers.’’ Of the
89, all have 1,500 or fewer employees.
Consequently, the Commission estimates that
most providers of competitive local exchange
service, competitive access providers,
‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’ and
‘‘Other Local Service Providers’’ are small
entities that may be affected by our proposed
action.
11. Local Resellers. The SBA has
developed a small business size standard for
the category of Telecommunications
Resellers. Under that size standard, such a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees.56 According to Commission
data,57 151 carriers have reported that they
are engaged in the provision of local resale
services. Of these, an estimated 149 have
1,500 or fewer employees and two have more
than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the
Commission estimates that the majority of
local resellers are small entities that may be
affected by our proposed action.
12. Toll Resellers. The SBA has developed
a small business size standard for the
category of Telecommunications Resellers.
Under that size standard, such a business is
52 13 CFR 121.201, North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code 517110.
53 FCC, Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry
Analysis and Technology Division, ‘‘Trends in
Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3, Page 5–5 (Aug.
2008) (‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’). This source
uses data that are current as of November 1, 2006.
54 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
55 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
56 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310.
57 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21552
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.58
According to Commission data,59 815 carriers
have reported that they are engaged in the
provision of toll resale services. Of these, an
estimated 787 have 1,500 or fewer employees
and 28 have more than 1,500 employees.
Consequently, the Commission estimates that
the majority of toll resellers are small entities
that may be affected by our proposed action.
13. Payphone Service Providers (‘‘PSPs’’).
Neither the Commission nor the SBA has
developed a small business size standard
specifically for payphone services providers.
The appropriate size standard under SBA
rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under that
size standard, such a business is small if it
has 1,500 or fewer employees.60 According to
Commission data,61 526 carriers have
reported that they are engaged in the
provision of payphone services. Of these, an
estimated 524 have 1,500 or fewer employees
and two have more than 1,500 employees.
Consequently, the Commission estimates that
the majority of payphone service providers
are small entities that may be affected by our
proposed action.
14. Interexchange Carriers (‘‘IXCs’’).
Neither the Commission nor the SBA has
developed a small business size standard
specifically for providers of interexchange
services. The appropriate size standard under
SBA rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under that
size standard, such a business is small if it
has 1,500 or fewer employees.62 According to
Commission data,63 300 carriers have
reported that they are engaged in the
provision of interexchange service. Of these,
an estimated 268 have 1,500 or fewer
employees and 32 have more than 1,500
employees. Consequently, the Commission
estimates that the majority of IXCs are small
entities that may be affected by our proposed
action.
15. Operator Service Providers (‘‘OSPs’’).
Neither the Commission nor the SBA has
developed a small business size standard
specifically for operator service providers.
The appropriate size standard under SBA
rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under that
size standard, such a business is small if it
has 1,500 or fewer employees.64 According to
Commission data,65 28 carriers have reported
that they are engaged in the provision of
operator services. Of these, an estimated 27
have 1,500 or fewer employees and one has
more than 1,500 employees. Consequently,
the Commission estimates that the majority
of OSPs are small entities that may be
affected by our proposed action.
16. Prepaid Calling Card Providers. Neither
the Commission nor the SBA has developed
a small business size standard specifically for
prepaid calling card providers. The
appropriate size standard under SBA rules is
58 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310.
in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
60 3 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
61 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
62 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
63 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
64 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
65 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
59 ‘‘Trends
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
for the category Telecommunications
Resellers. Under that size standard, such a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees.66 According to Commission
data,67 88 carriers have reported that they are
engaged in the provision of prepaid calling
cards. Of these, an estimated 85 have 1,500
or fewer employees and three have more than
1,500 employees. Consequently, the
Commission estimates that the majority of
prepaid calling card providers are small
entities that may be affected by our proposed
action.
17. 800 and 800–Like Service
Subscribers.68 Neither the Commission nor
the SBA has developed a small business size
standard specifically for 800 and 800-like
service (‘‘toll free’’) subscribers. The
appropriate size standard under SBA rules is
for the category Telecommunications
Resellers. Under that size standard, such a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees.69 The most reliable source of
information regarding the number of these
service subscribers appears to be data the
Commission receives from Database Service
Management on the 800, 866, 877, and 888
numbers in use.70 According to our data, at
the end of December 2007, the number of 800
numbers assigned was 7,860,000; the number
of 888 numbers assigned was 5,210,184; the
number of 877 numbers assigned was
4,388,682; and the number of 866 numbers
assigned was 7,029,116. We do not have data
specifying the number of these subscribers
that are independently owned and operated
or have 1,500 or fewer employees, and thus
are unable at this time to estimate with
greater precision the number of toll free
subscribers that would qualify as small
businesses under the SBA size standard.
Consequently, we estimate that there are
7,860,000 or fewer small entity 800
subscribers; 5,210,184 or fewer small entity
888 subscribers; 4,388,682 or fewer small
entity 877 subscribers, and 7,029,116 or
fewer entity 866 subscribers.
18. Satellite Telecommunications and All
Other Telecommunications. These two
economic census categories address the
satellite industry. The first category has a
small business size standard of $15 million
or less in average annual receipts, under SBA
rules.71 The second has a size standard of $25
million or less in annual receipts.72 The most
current Census Bureau data in this context,
however, are from the (last) economic census
of 2002, and we will use those figures to
gauge the prevalence of small businesses in
these categories.73
19. The category of Satellite
Telecommunications ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
providing telecommunications services to
66 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310.
in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
68 We include all toll-free number subscribers in
this category.
69 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310.
70 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Tables 18.4,
18.5, 18.6, and 18.7.
71 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517410.
72 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517919.
73 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517410 and
517910 (2002).
67 ‘‘Trends
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other establishments in the
telecommunications and broadcasting
industries by forwarding and receiving
communications signals via a system of
satellites or reselling satellite
telecommunications.’’ 74 For this category,
Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there
were a total of 371 firms that operated for the
entire year.75 Of this total, 307 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million, and 26
firms had receipts of $10 million to
$24,999,999.76 Consequently, we estimate
that the majority of Satellite
Telecommunications firms are small entities
that might be affected by our action.
20. The second category of All Other
Telecommunications comprises, inter alia,
‘‘establishments primarily engaged in
providing specialized telecommunications
services, such as satellite tracking,
communications telemetry, and radar station
operation. This industry also includes
establishments primarily engaged in
providing satellite terminal stations and
associated facilities connected with one or
more terrestrial systems and capable of
transmitting telecommunications to, and
receiving telecommunications from, satellite
systems.’’ 77 For this category, Census Bureau
data for 2002 show that there were a total of
332 firms that operated for the entire year.78
Of this total, 303 firms had annual receipts
of under $10 million and 15 firms had annual
receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.79
Consequently, we estimate that the majority
of All Other Telecommunications firms are
small entities that might be affected by our
action.
21. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite). Since 2007, the Census
Bureau has placed wireless firms within this
new, broad, economic census category.80
Prior to that time, such firms were within the
now-superseded categories of ‘‘Paging’’ and
‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.’’ 81 Under the present
and prior categories, the SBA has deemed a
wireless business to be small if it has 1,500
74 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517410 Satellite Telecommunications’’; https://
www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND517410.HTM.
75 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’
Table 4, NAICS code 517410 (issued Nov. 2005).
76 Id. An additional 38 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
77 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517919 All Other Telecommunications’’; https://
www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/
ND517919.HTM#N517919.
78 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’
Table 4, NAICS code 517910 (issued Nov. 2005).
79 Id. An additional 14 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
80 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517210 Wireless Telecommunications Categories
(Except Satellite)’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND517210.HTM#N517210.
81 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517211 Paging’’; https://www.census.gov/epcd/
naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.; U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517212 Cellular and
Other Wireless Telecommunications’’; https://
www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
or fewer employees.82 Because Census
Bureau data are not yet available for the new
category, we will estimate small business
prevalence using the prior categories and
associated data. For the category of Paging,
data for 2002 show that there were 807 firms
that operated for the entire year.83 Of this
total, 804 firms had employment of 999 or
fewer employees, and three firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or more.84
For the category of Cellular and Other
Wireless Telecommunications, data for 2002
show that there were 1,397 firms that
operated for the entire year.85 Of this total,
1,378 firms had employment of 999 or fewer
employees, and 19 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more.86 Thus, we
estimate that the majority of wireless firms
are small.
22. Common Carrier Paging. As noted, the
SBA has developed a small business size
standard for Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite) firms within the
broad economic census categories of
‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.’’ 87 Since 2007, the
Census Bureau has placed wireless firms
within this new, broad, economic census
category.88 Prior to that time, such firms were
within the now-superseded categories of
‘‘Paging’’ and ‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.’’ 89 Under the present
and prior categories, the SBA has deemed a
wireless business to be small if it has 1,500
or fewer employees.90 Because Census
Bureau data are not yet available for the new
category, we will estimate small business
prevalence using the prior categories and
associated data. For the category of Paging,
data for 2002 show that there were 807 firms
82 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210 (2007
NAICS). The now-superseded, pre-2007 C.F.R.
citations were 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes
517211 and 517212 (referring to the 2002 NAICS).
83 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’
Table 5, NAICS code 517211 (issued Nov. 2005).
84 Id. The census data do not provide a more
precise estimate of the number of firms that have
employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the
largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000
employees or more.’’
85 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’
Table 5, NAICS code 517212 (issued Nov. 2005).
86 Id. The census data do not provide a more
precise estimate of the number of firms that have
employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the
largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000
employees or more.’’
87 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517212.
88 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517210 Wireless Telecommunications Categories
(Except Satellite)’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND517210.HTM#N517210.
89 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517211 Paging’’; https://www.census.gov/epcd/
naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.; U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517212 Cellular and
Other Wireless Telecommunications’’; https://
www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.
90 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210 (2007
NAICS). The now-superseded, pre-2007 CFR
citations were 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes
517211 and 517212 (referring to the 2002 NAICS).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
that operated for the entire year.91 Of this
total, 804 firms had employment of 999 or
fewer employees, and three firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or more.92
For the category of Cellular and Other
Wireless Telecommunications, data for 2002
show that there were 1,397 firms that
operated for the entire year.93 Of this total,
1,378 firms had employment of 999 or fewer
employees, and 19 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more.94 Thus, we
estimate that the majority of wireless firms
are small.
23. In addition, in the Paging Second
Report and Order, the Commission adopted
a size standard for ‘‘small businesses’’ for
purposes of determining their eligibility for
special provisions such as bidding credits
and installment payments.95 A small
business is an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling principals, has
average gross revenues not exceeding $15
million for the preceding three years.96 The
SBA has approved this definition.97 An
initial auction of Metropolitan Economic
Area (‘‘MEA’’) licenses was conducted in the
year 2000. Of the 2,499 licenses auctioned,
985 were sold.98 Fifty-seven companies
claiming small business status won 440
licenses.99 A subsequent auction of MEA and
Economic Area (‘‘EA’’) licenses was held in
the year 2001. Of the 15,514 licenses
auctioned, 5,323 were sold.100 One hundred
thirty-two companies claiming small
business status purchased 3,724 licenses. A
third auction, consisting of 8,874 licenses in
each of 175 EAs and 1,328 licenses in all but
three of the 51 MEAs, was held in 2003.
91 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’
Table 5, NAICS code 517211 (issued Nov. 2005).
92 Id. The census data do not provide a more
precise estimate of the number of firms that have
employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the
largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000
employees or more.’’
93 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’
Table 5, NAICS code 517212 (issued Nov. 2005).
94 Id. The census data do not provide a more
precise estimate of the number of firms that have
employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the
largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000
employees or more.’’
95 Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the
Commission’s Rules to Facilitate Future
Development of Paging Systems, Second Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 2732, 2811–2812, paras. 178–
181 (‘‘Paging Second Report and Order’’); see also
Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission’s
Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging
Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order on
Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 10030, 10085–10088,
paras. 98–107 (1999).
96 Paging Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd
at 2811, para. 179.
97 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator,
SBA, to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry
Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau (‘‘WTB’’), FCC (Dec. 2, 1998) (‘‘Alvarez Letter
1998’’).
98 See ‘‘929 and 931 MHz Paging Auction Closes,’’
Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 4858 (WTB 2000).
99 See id.
100 See ‘‘Lower and Upper Paging Band Auction
Closes,’’ Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 21821 (WTB
2002).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21553
Seventy-seven bidders claiming small or very
small business status won 2,093 licenses.101
24. Currently, there are approximately
74,000 Common Carrier Paging licenses.
According to the most recent Trends in
Telephone Service, 281 carriers reported that
they were engaged in the provision of ‘‘paging
and messaging’’ services.102 Of these, an
estimated 279 have 1,500 or fewer employees
and two have more than 1,500 employees.103
We estimate that the majority of common
carrier paging providers would qualify as
small entities under the SBA definition.
25. 2.3 GHz Wireless Communications
Services. This service can be used for fixed,
mobile, radiolocation, and digital audio
broadcasting satellite uses. The Commission
defined ‘‘small business’’ for the wireless
communications services (‘‘WCS’’) auction as
an entity with average gross revenues of $40
million for each of the three preceding years,
and a ‘‘very small business’’ as an entity with
average gross revenues of $15 million for
each of the three preceding years.104 The
SBA has approved these definitions.105 The
Commission auctioned geographic area
licenses in the WCS service. In the auction,
which was conducted in 1997, there were
seven bidders that won 31 licenses that
qualified as very small business entities, and
one bidder that won one license that
qualified as a small business entity.
26. 1670–1675 MHz Services. An auction
for one license in the 1670–1675 MHz band
was conducted in 2003. One license was
awarded. The winning bidder was not a
small entity.
27. Wireless Telephony. Wireless
telephony includes cellular, personal
communications services, and specialized
mobile radio telephony carriers. As noted,
the SBA has developed a small business size
standard for Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite).106 Under the SBA
small business size standard, a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.107
According to Trends in Telephone Service
data, 434 carriers reported that they were
engaged in wireless telephony.108 Of these,
an estimated 222 have 1,500 or fewer
employees and 212 have more than 1,500
employees.109 We have estimated that 222 of
these are small under the SBA small business
size standard.
28. Broadband Personal Communications
Service. The broadband personal
101 See ‘‘Lower and Upper Paging Bands Auction
Closes,’’ Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11154 (WTB
2003). The current number of small or very small
business entities that hold wireless licenses may
differ significantly from the number of such entities
that won in spectrum auctions due to assignments
and transfers of licenses in the secondary market
over time. In addition, some of the same small
business entities may have won licenses in more
than one auction.
102 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
103 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
104 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to
Establish Part 27, the Wireless Communications
Service (WCS), Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd
10785, 10879, para. 194 (1997).
105 See Alvarez Letter 1998.
106 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
107 Id.
108 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
109 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21554
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
communications services (‘‘PCS’’) spectrum is
divided into six frequency blocks designated
A through F, and the Commission has held
auctions for each block. The Commission has
created a small business size standard for
Blocks C and F as an entity that has average
gross revenues of less than $40 million in the
three previous calendar years.110 For Block F,
an additional small business size standard for
‘‘very small business’’ was added and is
defined as an entity that, together with its
affiliates, has average gross revenues of not
more than $15 million for the preceding three
calendar years.111 These small business size
standards, in the context of broadband PCS
auctions, have been approved by the SBA.112
No small businesses within the SBAapproved small business size standards bid
successfully for licenses in Blocks A and B.
There were 90 winning bidders that qualified
as small entities in the Block C auctions. A
total of 93 ‘‘small’’ and ‘‘very small’’ business
bidders won approximately 40 percent of the
1,479 licenses for Blocks D, E, and F.113 In
1999, the Commission reauctioned 155 C, D,
E, and F Block licenses; there were 113 small
business winning bidders.114
29. In 2001, the Commission completed the
auction of 422 C and F Broadband PCS
licenses in Auction 35. Of the 35 winning
bidders in this auction, 29 qualified as
‘‘small’’ or ‘‘very small’’ businesses.115
Subsequent events, concerning Auction 35,
including judicial and agency
determinations, resulted in a total of 163 C
and F Block licenses being available for
grant. In 2005, the Commission completed an
auction of 188 C block licenses and 21 F
block licenses in Auction 58. There were 24
winning bidders for 217 licenses.116 Of the
24 winning bidders, 16 claimed small
business status and won 156 licenses. In
2007, the Commission completed an auction
of 33 licenses in the A, C, and F Blocks in
Auction 71.117 Of the 14 winning bidders, six
were designated entities.118 In 2008, the
Commission completed an auction of 20
Broadband PCS licenses in the C, D, E and
F block licenses in Auction 78.119
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
110 See
Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the
Commission’s Rules—Broadband PCS Competitive
Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service
Spectrum Cap, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824,
7850–7852, paras. 57–60 (1996) (‘‘PCS Report and
Order’’); see also 47 CFR 24.720(b).
111 See PCS Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at
7852, para. 60.
112 See Alvarez Letter 1998.
113 FCC News, ‘‘Broadband PCS, D, E and F Block
Auction Closes,’’ No. 71744 (rel. Jan. 14, 1997).
114 See ‘‘C, D, E, and F Block Broadband PCS
Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 6688
(WTB 1999).
115 See ‘‘C and F Block Broadband PCS Auction
Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public
notice, 16 FCC Rcd 2339 (2001).
116 See ‘‘Broadband PCS Spectrum Auction
Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction
No. 58,’’ public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 3703 (2005).
117 See ‘‘Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum
Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for
Auction No. 71,’’ public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 9247
(2007).
118 Id.
119 See Auction of AWS–1 and Broadband PCS
Licenses Rescheduled for August 13, 2008, Notice
of Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
30. Advanced Wireless Services. In 2008,
the Commission conducted the auction of
Advanced Wireless Services (‘‘AWS’’)
licenses.120 This auction, which as
designated as Auction 78, offered 35 licenses
in the AWS 1710–1755 MHz and 2110–2155
MHz bands (‘‘AWS–1’’). The AWS–1 licenses
were licenses for which there were no
winning bids in Auction 66. That same year,
the Commission completed Auction 78. A
bidder with attributed average annual gross
revenues that exceeded $15 million and did
not exceed $40 million for the preceding
three years (‘‘small business’’) received a 15
percent discount on its winning bid. A
bidder with attributed average annual gross
revenues that did not exceed $15 million for
the preceding three years (‘‘very small
business’’) received a 25 percent discount on
its winning bid. A bidder that had combined
total assets of less than $500 million and
combined gross revenues of less than $125
million in each of the last two years qualified
for entrepreneur status.121 Four winning
bidders that identified themselves as very
small businesses won 17 licenses.122 Three of
the winning bidders that identified
themselves as a small business won five
licenses. Additionally, one other winning
bidder that qualified for entrepreneur status
won 2 licenses.
31. Narrowband Personal Communications
Services. In 1994, the Commission conducted
an auction for Narrowband PCS licenses. A
second auction was also conducted later in
1994. For purposes of the first two
Narrowband PCS auctions, ‘‘small
businesses’’ were entities with average gross
revenues for the prior three calendar years of
$40 million or less.123 Through these
auctions, the Commission awarded a total of
41 licenses, 11 of which were obtained by
four small businesses.124 To ensure
meaningful participation by small business
entities in future auctions, the Commission
adopted a two-tiered small business size
standard in the Narrowband PCS Second
Report and Order.125 A ‘‘small business’’ is an
Upfront Payments and Other Procedures For
Auction 78, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 7496 (2008)
(‘‘AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Procedures Public
Notice’’).
120 See AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Procedures
Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 7496. Auction 78 also
included an auction of Broadband PCS licenses.
121 Id. at 23 FCC Rcd at 7521–22.
122 See ‘‘Auction of AWS–1 and Broadband PCS
Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for
Auction 78, Down Payments Due September 9,
2008, FCC Forms 601 and 602 Due September 9,
2008, Final Payments Due September 23, 2008, TenDay Petition to Deny Period’’, public notice, 23 FCC
Rcd 12749–65 (2008).
123 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the
Communications Act—Competitive Bidding
Narrowband PCS, Third Memorandum Opinion and
Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
10 FCC Rcd 175, 196, para. 46 (1994).
124 See ‘‘Announcing the High Bidders in the
Auction of ten Nationwide Narrowband PCS
Licenses, Winning Bids Total $617,006,674,’’ Public
Notice, PNWL 94–004 (rel. Aug. 2, 1994);
‘‘Announcing the High Bidders in the Auction of 30
Regional Narrowband PCS Licenses; Winning Bids
Total $490,901,787,’’ public notice, PNWL 94–27
(rel. Nov. 9, 1994).
125 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to
Establish New Personal Communications Services,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entity that, together with affiliates and
controlling interests, has average gross
revenues for the three preceding years of not
more than $40 million.126 A ‘‘very small
business’’ is an entity that, together with
affiliates and controlling interests, has
average gross revenues for the three
preceding years of not more than $15
million.127 The SBA has approved these
small business size standards.128 A third
auction was conducted in 2001. Here, five
bidders won 317 (Metropolitan Trading
Areas and nationwide) licenses.129 Three of
these claimed status as a small or very small
entity and won 311 licenses.
32. 700 MHz Band Licenses. The
Commission previously adopted criteria for
defining three groups of small businesses for
purposes of determining their eligibility for
special provisions such as bidding credits.130
The Commission defined a ‘‘small business’’
as an entity that, together with its affiliates
and controlling principals, has average gross
revenues not exceeding $40 million for the
preceding three years.131 A ‘‘very small
business’’ is defined as an entity that,
together with its affiliates and controlling
principals, has average gross revenues that
are not more than $15 million for the
preceding three years.132 Additionally, the
lower 700 MHz Service had a third category
of small business status for Metropolitan/
Rural Service Area (‘‘MSA/RSA’’) licenses.
The third category is ‘‘entrepreneur,’’ which
is defined as an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling principals, has
average gross revenues that are not more than
$3 million for the preceding three years.133
The SBA approved these small size
standards.134 The Commission conducted an
auction in 2002 of 740 licenses (one license
in each of the 734 MSAs/RSAs and one
license in each of the six Economic Area
Groupings (EAGs)). Of the 740 licenses
available for auction, 484 licenses were sold
to 102 winning bidders. Seventy-two of the
winning bidders claimed small business,
very small business or entrepreneur status
and won a total of 329 licenses. 135 The
Commission conducted a second auction in
2003 that included 256 licenses: 5 EAG
licenses and 476 Cellular Market Area
Narrowband PCS, Second Report and Order and
Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15
FCC Rcd 10456, 10476, para. 40 (2000)
(‘‘Narrowband PCS Second Report and Order’’).
126 Narrowband PCS Second Report and Order,
15 FCC Rcd at 10476, para. 40.
127 Id.
128 See Alvarez Letter 1998.
129 See ‘‘Narrowband PCS Auction Closes,’’ public
notice, 16 FCC Rcd 18663 (WTB 2001).
130 See Reallocation and Service Rules for the
698–746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels
52–59), Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 (2002)
(‘‘Channels 52–59 Report and Order’’).
131 See Channels 52–59 Report and Order, 17 FCC
Rcd at 1087–88, para. 172.
132 See id.
133 See id., 17 FCC Rcd at 1088, para. 173.
134 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator,
SBA, to Thomas Sugrue, Chief, WTB, FCC (Aug. 10,
1999) (‘‘Alvarez Letter 1999’’).
135 See ‘‘Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,’’
public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
licenses.136 Seventeen winning bidders
claimed small or very small business status
and won 60 licenses, and nine winning
bidders claimed entrepreneur status and won
154 licenses.137 In 2005, the Commission
completed an auction of 5 licenses in the
lower 700 MHz band (Auction 60). There
were three winning bidders for five licenses.
All three winning bidders claimed small
business status.
33. In 2007, the Commission adopted the
700 MHz Second Report and Order.138 The
Order revised the band plan for the
commercial (including Guard Band) and
public safety spectrum, adopted services
rules, including stringent build-out
requirements, an open platform requirement
on the C Block, and a requirement on the D
Block licensee to construct and operate a
nationwide, interoperable wireless
broadband network for public safety users. In
2008, the Commission commenced Auction
73 which offered all available, commercial
700 MHz Band licenses (1,099 licenses) for
bidding using the Commission’s standard
simultaneous multiple-round (‘‘SMR’’)
auction format for the A, B, D, and E block
licenses and an SMR auction design with
hierarchical package bidding (‘‘HPB’’) for the
C Block licenses. Later in 2008, the
Commission concluded Auction 73.139 A
bidder with attributed average annual gross
revenues that did not exceed $15 million for
the preceding three years (very small
business) qualified for a 25 percent discount
on its winning bids. A bidder with attributed
average annual gross revenues that exceeded
$15 million, but did not exceed $40 million
for the preceding three years, qualified for a
15 percent discount on its winning bids.
There were 36 winning bidders (who won
330 of the 1,090 licenses won) that identified
themselves as very small businesses. There
were 20 winning bidders that identified
themselves as a small business that won 49
136 See ‘‘Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,’’
public notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003).
137 See id.
138 Service Rules for the 698–746, 747–762 and
777–792 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 06–150,
Revision of the Commission’s Rules to Ensure
Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency
Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94–102, Section
68.4(a) of the Commission’s rules Governing
Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephone, WT Docket No.
01–309, Biennial Regulatory Review—Amendment
of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, and 90 to Streamline and
Harmonize Various Rules Affecting Wireless Radio
Services, WT Docket No. 03–264, Former Nextel
Communications, Inc. Upper700 MHz Guard Band
Licenses and Revisions to Part 27 of the
Commission’s rules, WT Docket No. 06–169,
Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband
Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz
Band, PS Docket No. 06–229, Development of
Operational, Technical and Spectrum
Requirements for Meeting Federal, State, and Local
Public Safety Communications Requirements
Through the Year 2010, WT Docket No. 96–86,
Second Report and Order, FCC 07–132 (2007) (‘‘700
MHz Second Report and Order’’), 22 FCC Rcd 15289
(2007).
139 Auction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Closes,
Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 73, Down
Payments Due April 3, 2008, FCC Forms 601 and
602 April 3, 2008, Final Payment Due April 17,
2008, Ten-Day Petition to Deny Period, Public
Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 4572 (2008).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
of the 1,090 licenses won.140 The
provisionally winning bids for the A, B, C,
and E Block licenses exceeded the aggregate
reserve prices for those blocks. However, the
provisionally winning bid for the D Block
license did not meet the applicable reserve
price and thus did not become a winning
bid.141
34. 700 MHz Guard Band Licenses. In the
700 MHz Guard Band Order, the Commission
adopted size standards for ‘‘small businesses’’
and ‘‘very small businesses’’ for purposes of
determining their eligibility for special
provisions such as bidding credits and
installment payments.142 A small business in
this service is an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling principals, has
average gross revenues not exceeding $40
million for the preceding three years.143
Additionally, a very small business is an
entity that, together with its affiliates and
controlling principals, has average gross
revenues that are not more than $15 million
for the preceding three years.144 SBA
approval of these definitions is not
required.145 In 2000, the Commission
conducted an auction of 52 Major Economic
Area (‘‘MEA’’) licenses.146 Of the 104 licenses
auctioned, 96 licenses were sold to nine
bidders. Five of these bidders were small
businesses that won a total of 26 licenses. A
second auction of 700 MHz Guard Band
licenses commenced and closed in 2001. All
eight of the licenses auctioned were sold to
three bidders. One of these bidders was a
small business that won a total of two
licenses.147
35. Specialized Mobile Radio. The
Commission awards ‘‘small entity’’ bidding
credits in auctions for Specialized Mobile
Radio (SMR) geographic area licenses in the
800 MHz and 900 MHz bands to firms that
had revenues of no more than $15 million in
each of the three previous calendar years.148
The Commission awards ‘‘very small entity’’
bidding credits to firms that had revenues of
no more than $3 million in each of the three
previous calendar years.149 The SBA has
approved these small business size standards
for the 900 MHz Service.150 The Commission
has held auctions for geographic area licenses
in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. The 900
MHz SMR auction was completed in 1996.
140 Id.
23 FCC Rcd at 4572–73.
141 Id.
142 See Service Rules for the 746–764 MHz Bands,
and Revisions to Part 27 of the Commission’s rules,
Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5299 (2000)
(‘‘746–764 MHz Band Second Report and Order’’).
143 See 746–764 MHz Band Second Report and
Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5343, para. 108.
144 See id.
145 See id., 15 FCC Rcd 5299, 5343, para. 108
n.246 (for the 746–764 MHz and 776–794 MHz
bands, the Commission is exempt from 15 U.S.C.
632, which requires Federal agencies to obtain SBA
approval before adopting small business size
standards).
146 See ‘‘700 MHz Guard Bands Auction Closes:
Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 15
FCC Rcd 18026 (2000).
147 See ‘‘700 MHz Guard Bands Auction Closes:
Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 16
FCC Rcd 4590 (WTB 2001).
148 47 CFR 90.814(b)(1).
149 47 CFR 90.814(b)(1).
150 See Alvarez Letter 1999.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21555
Sixty bidders claiming that they qualified as
small businesses under the $15 million size
standard won 263 geographic area licenses in
the 900 MHz SMR band. The 800 MHz SMR
auction for the upper 200 channels was
conducted in 1997. Ten bidders claiming that
they qualified as small businesses under the
$15 million size standard won 38 geographic
area licenses for the upper 200 channels in
the 800 MHz SMR band.151 A second auction
for the 800 MHz band was conducted in 2002
and included 23 BEA licenses. One bidder
claiming small business status won five
licenses.152
36. The auction of the 1,053 800 MHz SMR
geographic area licenses for the General
Category channels was conducted in 2000.
Eleven bidders won 108 geographic area
licenses for the General Category channels in
the 800 MHz SMR band qualified as small
businesses under the $15 million size
standard.153 In an auction completed in 2000,
a total of 2,800 Economic Area licenses in the
lower 80 channels of the 800 MHz SMR
service were awarded.154 Of the 22 winning
bidders, 19 claimed small business status and
won 129 licenses. Thus, combining all three
auctions, 40 winning bidders for geographic
licenses in the 800 MHz SMR band claimed
status as small business.
37. In addition, there are numerous
incumbent site-by-site SMR licensees and
licensees with extended implementation
authorizations in the 800 and 900 MHz
bands. We do not know how many firms
provide 800 MHz or 900 MHz geographic
area SMR pursuant to extended
implementation authorizations, nor how
many of these providers have annual
revenues of no more than $15 million. One
firm has over $15 million in revenues. In
addition, we do not know how many of these
firms have 1,500 or fewer employees.155 We
assume, for purposes of this analysis, that all
of the remaining existing extended
implementation authorizations are held by
small entities, as that small business size
standard is approved by the SBA.
38. 220 MHz Radio Service—Phase I
Licensees. The 220 MHz service has both
Phase I and Phase II licenses. Phase I
licensing was conducted by lotteries in 1992
and 1993. There are approximately 1,515
such non-nationwide licensees and four
nationwide licensees currently authorized to
operate in the 220 MHz band. The
Commission has not developed a definition
of small entities specifically applicable to
such incumbent 220 MHz Phase I licensees.
151 See ‘‘Correction to Public Notice DA 96–586
‘FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction
of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major
Trading Areas,’ ’’ public notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367
(WTB 1996).
152 See ‘‘Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,’’
public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002).
153 See ‘‘800 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio
(SMR) Service General Category (851–854 MHz) and
Upper Band (861–865 MHz) Auction Closes;
Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 15
FCC Rcd 17162 (2000).
154 See, ‘‘800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80
Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders
Announced,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736
(2000).
155 See generally 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code
517210.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21556
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
To estimate the number of such licensees that
are small businesses, we apply the small
business size standard under the SBA rules
applicable to Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite).156 This category
provides that a small business is a wireless
company employing no more than 1,500
persons.157 The Commission estimates that
most such licensees are small businesses
under the SBA’s small business standard.
39. 220 MHz Radio Service—Phase II
Licensees. The 220 MHz service has both
Phase I and Phase II licenses. The Phase II
220 MHz service is a new service, and is
subject to spectrum auctions. In the 220 MHz
Third Report and Order, the Commission
adopted a small business size standard for
defining ‘‘small’’ and ‘‘very small’’ businesses
for purposes of determining their eligibility
for special provisions such as bidding credits
and installment payments.158 This small
business standard indicates that a ‘‘small
business’’ is an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling principals, has
average gross revenues not exceeding $15
million for the preceding three years.159 A
‘‘very small business’’ is defined as an entity
that, together with its affiliates and
controlling principals, has average gross
revenues that do not exceed $3 million for
the preceding three years.160 The SBA has
approved these small size standards.161
Auctions of Phase II licenses commenced on
and closed in 1998.162 In the first auction,
908 licenses were auctioned in three
different-sized geographic areas: three
nationwide licenses, 30 Regional Economic
Area Group (‘‘EAG’’) Licenses, and 875
Economic Area (EA) Licenses. Of the 908
licenses auctioned, 693 were sold.163 Thirtynine small businesses won 373 licenses in
the first 220 MHz auction. A second auction
included 225 licenses: 216 EA licenses and
9 EAG licenses. Fourteen companies
claiming small business status won 158
licenses.164 A third auction included four
licenses: 2 BEA licenses and 2 EAG licenses
in the 220 MHz Service. No small or very
small business won any of these licenses.165
In 2007, the Commission conducted a fourth
auction of the 220 MHz licenses.166 Bidding
156 Id.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
157 Id.
158 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s
Rules to Provide For the Use of the 220–222 MHz
Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service,
Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 10943, 11068–
70, paras. 291–295 (1997).
159 Id. at 11068, para. 291.
160 Id.
161 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator,
SBA, to Daniel Phythyon, Chief, WTB, FCC (Jan. 6,
1998) (‘‘Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998’’).
162 See generally ‘‘220 MHz Service Auction
Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 605 (1998).
163 See ‘‘FCC Announces It is Prepared to Grant
654 Phase II 220 MHz Licenses After Final Payment
is Made,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 1085 (1999).
164 See ‘‘Phase II 220 MHz Service Spectrum
Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11218
(1999).
165 See ‘‘Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,’’
public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (2002).
166 See ‘‘Auction of Phase II 220 MHz Service
Spectrum Scheduled for June 20, 2007, Notice and
Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids,
Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for
Auction 72, public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 3404 (2007).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
credits were offered to small businesses. A
bidder with attributed average annual gross
revenues that exceeded $3 million and did
not exceed $15 million for the preceding
three years (‘‘small business’’) received a 25
percent discount on its winning bid. A
bidder with attributed average annual gross
revenues that did not exceed $3 million for
the preceding three years received a 35
percent discount on its winning bid (‘‘very
small business’’). Auction 72, which offered
94 Phase II 220 MHz Service licenses,
concluded in 2007.167 In this auction, five
winning bidders won a total of 76 licenses.
Two winning bidders identified themselves
as very small businesses won 56 of the 76
licenses. One of the winning bidders that
identified themselves as a small business
won 5 of the 76 licenses won.
40. Cellular Radiotelephone Service.
Auction 77 was held to resolve one group of
mutually exclusive applications for Cellular
Radiotelephone Service licenses for unserved
areas in New Mexico.168 Bidding credits for
designated entities were not available in
Auction 77.169 In 2008, the Commission
completed the closed auction of one
unserved service area in the Cellular
Radiotelephone Service, designated as
Auction 77. Auction 77 concluded with one
provisionally winning bid for the unserved
area totaling $25,002.170
41. Private Land Mobile Radio (‘‘PLMR’’).
PLMR systems serve an essential role in a
range of industrial, business, land
transportation, and public safety activities.
These radios are used by companies of all
sizes operating in all U.S. business
categories, and are often used in support of
the licensee’s primary (nontelecommunications) business operations.
For the purpose of determining whether a
licensee of a PLMR system is a small
business as defined by the SBA, we use the
broad census category, Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite). This definition provides that a
small entity is any such entity employing no
more than 1,500 persons.171 The Commission
does not require PLMR licensees to disclose
information about number of employees, so
the Commission does not have information
that could be used to determine how many
PLMR licensees constitute small entities
under this definition. We note that PLMR
licensees generally use the licensed facilities
in support of other business activities, and
therefore, it would also be helpful to assess
167 See ‘‘Auction of Phase II 220 MHz Service
Spectrum Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders
Announced for Auction 72, Down Payments due
July 18, 2007, FCC Forms 601 and 602 due July 18,
2007, Final Payments due August 1, 2007, Ten-Day
Petition to Deny Period, public notice, 22 FCC Rcd
11573 (2007).
168 See Closed Auction of Licenses for Cellular
Unserved Service Area Scheduled for June 17, 2008,
Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening
Bids, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for
Auction 77, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 6670 (2008).
169 Id. at 6685.
170 See Auction of Cellular Unserved Service Area
License Closes, Winning Bidder Announced for
Auction 77, Down Payment due July 2, 2008, Final
Payment due July 17, 2008, public notice, 23 FCC
Rcd 9501 (2008).
171 See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PLMR licensees under the standards applied
to the particular industry subsector to which
the licensee belongs.172
42. As of March 2010, there were 424,162
PLMR licensees operating 921,909
transmitters in the PLMR bands below 512
MHz. We note that any entity engaged in a
commercial activity is eligible to hold a
PLMR license, and that any revised rules in
this context could therefore potentially
impact small entities covering a great variety
of industries.
43. Fixed Microwave Services. Fixed
microwave services include common
carrier,173 private operational-fixed,174 and
broadcast auxiliary radio services.175 At
present, there are approximately 22,015
common carrier fixed licensees and 61,670
private operational-fixed licensees and
broadcast auxiliary radio licensees in the
microwave services. The Commission has not
created a size standard for a small business
specifically with respect to fixed microwave
services. For purposes of this analysis, the
Commission uses the SBA small business
size standard for the category Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite), which is 1,500 or fewer
employees.176 The Commission does not
have data specifying the number of these
licensees that have no more than 1,500
employees, and thus are unable at this time
to estimate with greater precision the number
of fixed microwave service licensees that
would qualify as small business concerns
under the SBA’s small business size
standard. Consequently, the Commission
estimates that there are 22,015 or fewer
common carrier fixed licensees and 61,670 or
fewer private operational-fixed licensees and
broadcast auxiliary radio licensees in the
microwave services that may be small and
may be affected by the rules and policies
proposed herein. We note, however, that the
common carrier microwave fixed licensee
category includes some large entities.
44. 39 GHz Service. The Commission
created a special small business size standard
for 39 GHz licenses—an entity that has
average gross revenues of $40 million or less
in the three previous calendar years.177 An
172 See
generally 13 CFR 121.201.
47 CFR 101 et seq. for common carrier
fixed microwave services (except Multipoint
Distribution Service).
174 Persons eligible under parts 80 and 90 of the
Commission’s Rules can use Private OperationalFixed Microwave services. See 47 CFR parts 80 and
90. Stations in this service are called operationalfixed to distinguish them from common carrier and
public fixed stations. Only the licensee may use the
operational-fixed station, and only for
communications related to the licensee’s
commercial, industrial, or safety operations.
175 Auxiliary Microwave Service is governed by
Part 74 of Title 47 of the Commission’s rules. See
47 CFR part 74. This service is available to licensees
of broadcast stations and to broadcast and cable
network entities. Broadcast auxiliary microwave
stations are used for relaying broadcast television
signals from the studio to the transmitter, or
between two points such as a main studio and an
auxiliary studio. The service also includes mobile
television pickups, which relay signals from a
remote location back to the studio.
176 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
177 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules
Regarding the 37.0–38.6 GHz and 38.6–40.0 GHz
173 See
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
additional size standard for ‘‘very small
business’’ is: An entity that, together with
affiliates, has average gross revenues of not
more than $15 million for the preceding three
calendar years.178 The SBA has approved
these small business size standards.179 The
auction of the 2,173, 39 GHz licenses, began
and closed in 2000. The 18 bidders who
claimed small business status won 849
licenses.
45. Local Multipoint Distribution Service.
Local Multipoint Distribution Service
(‘‘LMDS’’) is a fixed broadband point-tomultipoint microwave service that provides
for two-way video telecommunications.180
The auction of the 986 LMDS licenses began
and closed in 1998. The Commission
established a small business size standard for
LMDS licenses as an entity that has average
gross revenues of less than $40 million in the
three previous calendar years.181 An
additional small business size standard for
‘‘very small business’’ was added as an entity
that, together with its affiliates, has average
gross revenues of not more than $15 million
for the preceding three calendar years.182 The
SBA has approved these small business size
standards in the context of LMDS
auctions.183 There were 93 winning bidders
that qualified as small entities in the LMDS
auctions. A total of 93 small and very small
business bidders won approximately 277 A
Block licenses and 387 B Block licenses. In
1999, the Commission re-auctioned 161
licenses; there were 32 small and very small
businesses winning that won 119 licenses.
46. 218–219 MHz Service. The first auction
of 218–219 MHz (previously referred to as
the Interactive and Video Data Service or
IVDS) spectrum resulted in 178 entities
winning licenses for 594 Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (‘‘MSAs’’).184 Of the 594
licenses, 567 were won by 167 entities
qualifying as a small business. For that
auction, the Commission defined a small
business as an entity that, together with its
affiliates, has no more than a $6 million net
worth and, after Federal income taxes
(excluding any carry over losses), has no
more than $2 million in annual profits each
Bands, ET Docket No. 95–183, Report and Order, 12
FCC Rcd 18600 (1997).
178 Id.
179 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator,
SBA, to Kathleen O’Brien Ham, Chief, Auctions and
Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (Feb. 4,
1998); see Letter from Hector Barreto,
Administrator, SBA, to Margaret Wiener, Chief,
Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB,
FCC (Jan. 18, 2002).
180 See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25,
of the Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the 27.5–
29.5 GHz Frequency Band, Reallocate the 29.5–30.5
Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for
Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed
Satellite Services, Second Report and Order, Order
on Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of Proposed
Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12689–90, para.
348 (1997) (‘‘LMDS Second Report and Order’’).
181 See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC
Rcd at 12689–90, para. 348.
182 See id.
183 See Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998.
184 See ‘‘Interactive Video and Data Service
(IVDS) Applications Accepted for Filing,’’ public
notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6227 (1994).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
year for the previous two years.185 In the
218–219 MHz Report and Order and
Memorandum Opinion and Order, we
defined a small business as an entity that,
together with its affiliates and persons or
entities that hold interests in such an entity
and their affiliates, has average annual gross
revenues not exceeding $15 million for the
preceding three years.186 A very small
business is defined as an entity that, together
with its affiliates and persons or entities that
hold interests in such an entity and its
affiliates, has average annual gross revenues
not exceeding $3 million for the preceding
three years.187 The SBA has approved of
these definitions.188 A subsequent auction is
not yet scheduled. Given the success of small
businesses in the previous auction, and the
prevalence of small businesses in the
subscription television services and message
communications industries, we assume for
purposes of this analysis that in future
auctions, many, and perhaps most, of the
licenses may be awarded to small businesses.
47. Location and Monitoring Service
(‘‘LMS’’). Multilateration LMS systems use
non-voice radio techniques to determine the
location and status of mobile radio units. For
purposes of auctioning LMS licenses, the
Commission has defined ‘‘small business’’ as
an entity that, together with controlling
interests and affiliates, has average annual
gross revenues for the preceding three years
not exceeding $15 million.189 A ‘‘very small
business’’ is defined as an entity that,
together with controlling interests and
affiliates, has average annual gross revenues
for the preceding three years not exceeding
$3 million.190 These definitions have been
approved by the SBA.191 An auction for LMS
licenses commenced and closed in 1999. Of
the 528 licenses auctioned, 289 licenses were
sold to four small businesses.
48. Rural Radiotelephone Service. The
Commission has not adopted a size standard
for small businesses specific to the Rural
Radiotelephone Service.192 A significant
subset of the Rural Radiotelephone Service is
the Basic Exchange Telephone Radio System
(‘‘BETRS’’).193 In the present context, we will
use the SBA’s small business size standard
applicable to Wireless Telecommunications
185 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the
Communications Act—Competitive Bidding, Fourth
Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2330 (1994).
186 Amendment of Part 95 of the Commission’s
Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218–
219 MHz Service, Report and Order and
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 1497
(1999).
187 Id.
188 See Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998.
189 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s
Rules to Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle
Monitoring Systems, Second Report and Order, 13
FCC Rcd 15182, 15192, para. 20 (1998) (‘‘Automatic
Vehicle Monitoring Systems Second Report and
Order’’); see also 47 CFR 90.1103.
190 Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems
Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15192,
para. 20; see also 47 CFR 90.1103.
191 See Alvarez Letter 1998.
192 The service is defined in section 22.99 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.99.
193 BETRS is defined in sections 22.757 and
22.759 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.757
and 22.759.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21557
Carriers (except Satellite), i.e., an entity
employing no more than 1,500 persons.194
There are approximately 1,000 licensees in
the Rural Radiotelephone Service, and the
Commission estimates that there are 1,000 or
fewer small entity licensees in the Rural
Radiotelephone Service that may be affected
by the rules and policies proposed herein.
49. Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service.195
The Commission has previously used the
SBA’s small business definition applicable to
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite), i.e., an entity employing no
more than 1,500 persons.196 There are
approximately 100 licensees in the AirGround Radiotelephone Service, and under
that definition, we estimate that almost all of
them qualify as small entities under the SBA
definition. For purposes of assigning AirGround Radiotelephone Service licenses
through competitive bidding, the
Commission has defined ‘‘small business’’ as
an entity that, together with controlling
interests and affiliates, has average annual
gross revenues for the preceding three years
not exceeding $40 million.197 A ‘‘very small
business’’ is defined as an entity that,
together with controlling interests and
affiliates, has average annual gross revenues
for the preceding three years not exceeding
$15 million.198 These definitions were
approved by the SBA.199 In 2006, the
Commission completed an auction of
nationwide commercial Air-Ground
Radiotelephone Service licenses in the 800
MHz band (Auction 65). Later in 2006, the
auction closed with two winning bidders
winning two Air-Ground Radiotelephone
Services licenses. Neither of the winning
bidders claimed small business status.
50. Aviation and Marine Radio Services.
There are approximately 26,162 aviation,
34,555 marine (ship), and 3,296 marine
(coast) licensees.200 The Commission has not
developed a small business size standard
specifically applicable to all licensees. For
purposes of this analysis, we will use the
SBA small business size standard for the
category Wireless Telecommunications
194 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
service is defined in section 22.99 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.99.
196 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517210.
197 Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission’s
Rules to Benefit the Consumers of Air-Ground
Telecommunications Services, Biennial Regulatory
Review—Amendment of Parts 1, 22, and 90 of the
Commission’s Rules, Amendment of Parts 1 and 22
of the Commission’s Rules to Adopt Competitive
Bidding Rules for Commercial and General Aviation
Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service, WT Docket
Nos. 03–103 and 05–42, Order on Reconsideration
and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras.
28–42 (2005).
198 Id.
199 See Letter from Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy
Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division,
WTB, FCC (Sept. 19, 2005).
200 Vessels that are not required by law to carry
a radio and do not make international voyages or
communications are not required to obtain an
individual license. See Amendment of parts 80 and
87 of the Commission’s rules to Permit Operation
of Certain Domestic Ship and Aircraft Radio
Stations Without Individual Licenses, Report and
Order, WT Docket No. 96–82, 11 FCC Rcd 14849
(1996).
195 The
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21558
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Carriers (except Satellite), which is 1,500 or
fewer employees.201 We are unable to
determine how many of those licensed fall
under this standard. For purposes of our
evaluations in this analysis, we estimate that
there are up to approximately 62,969
licensees that are small businesses under the
SBA standard.202 In 1998, the Commission
held an auction of 42 VHF Public Coast
licenses in the 157.1875–157.4500 MHz (ship
transmit) and 161.775–162.0125 MHz (coast
transmit) bands. For this auction, the
Commission defined a ‘‘small’’ business as an
entity that, together with controlling interests
and affiliates, has average gross revenues for
the preceding three years not to exceed $15
million dollars. In addition, a ‘‘very small’’
business is one that, together with controlling
interests and affiliates, has average gross
revenues for the preceding three years not to
exceed $3 million dollars.203 Further, the
Commission made available Automated
Maritime Telecommunications System
(‘‘AMTS’’) licenses in Auctions 57 and 61.204
Winning bidders could claim status as a very
small business or a small business. A very
small business for this service is defined as
an entity with attributed average annual gross
revenues that do not exceed $3 million for
the preceding three years, and a small
business is defined as an entity with
attributed average annual gross revenues of
more than $3 million but less than $15
million for the preceding three years.205
Three of the winning bidders in Auction 57
qualified as small or very small businesses,
while three winning entities in Auction 61
qualified as very small businesses.
51. Offshore Radiotelephone Service. This
service operates on several ultra high
frequencies (‘‘UHF’’) television broadcast
channels that are not used for television
broadcasting in the coastal areas of States
bordering the Gulf of Mexico.206 There is
presently 1 licensee in this service. We do
not have information whether that licensee
would qualify as small under the SBA’s small
business size standard for Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite) services.207 Under that SBA small
business size standard, a business is small if
it has 1,500 or fewer employees.208
201 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
licensee may have a license in more than
one category.
203 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules
Concerning Maritime Communications, PR Docket
No. 92–257, Third Report and Order and
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd
19853 (1998).
204 See ‘‘Automated Maritime
Telecommunications System Spectrum Auction
Scheduled for September 15, 2004, Notice and
Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids,
Upfront Payments and Other Auction Procedures,’’
public notice, 19 FCC Rcd 9518 (WTB 2004);
‘‘Auction of Automated Maritime
Telecommunications System Licenses Scheduled
for August 3, 2005, Notice and Filing Requirements,
Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and
Other Auction Procedures for Auction No. 61,’’
public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 7811 (WTB 2005).
205 47 CFR 80.1252.
206 This service is governed by subpart I of part
22 of the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR 22.1001–
22.1037.
207 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
208 Id.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
202 A
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
52. Multiple Address Systems (‘‘MAS’’).
Entities using MAS spectrum, in general, fall
into two categories: (1) Those using the
spectrum for profit-based uses, and (2) those
using the spectrum for private internal uses.
With respect to the first category, the
Commission defines ‘‘small entity’’ for MAS
licenses as an entity that has average gross
revenues of less than $15 million in the three
previous calendar years.209 ‘‘Very small
business’’ is defined as an entity that,
together with its affiliates, has average gross
revenues of not more than $3 million for the
preceding three calendar years.210 The SBA
has approved of these definitions.211 The
majority of these entities will most likely be
licensed in bands where the Commission has
implemented a geographic area licensing
approach that would require the use of
competitive bidding procedures to resolve
mutually exclusive applications. The
Commission’s licensing database indicates
that, as of March 5, 2010, there were over
11,500 MAS station authorizations. In
addition, an auction for 5,104 MAS licenses
in 176 EAs was conducted in 2001.212 Seven
winning bidders claimed status as small or
very small businesses and won 611 licenses.
In 2005, the Commission completed an
auction (Auction 59) of 4,226 MAS licenses
in the Fixed Microwave Services from the
928/959 and 932/941 MHz bands. Twenty-six
winning bidders won a total of 2,323
licenses. Of the 26 winning bidders in this
auction, five claimed small business status
and won 1,891 licenses.
53. With respect to the second category,
which consists of entities that use, or seek to
use, MAS spectrum to accommodate internal
communications needs, we note that MAS
serves an essential role in a range of
industrial, safety, business, and land
transportation activities. MAS radios are
used by companies of all sizes, operating in
virtually all U.S. business categories, and by
all types of public safety entities. For the
majority of private internal users, the small
business size standard developed by the SBA
would be more appropriate. The applicable
size standard in this instance appears to be
that of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite). This definition provides
that a small entity is any such entity
employing no more than 1,500 persons.213
The Commission’s licensing database
indicates that, as of January 20, 1999, of the
8,670 total MAS station authorizations, 8,410
authorizations were for private radio service,
and of these, 1,433 were for private land
mobile radio service.
54. 1.4 GHz Band Licensees. The
Commission conducted an auction of 64
1.4 GHz band licenses 214 in 2007.215 In that
209 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules
Regarding Multiple Address Systems, Report and
Order, 15 FCC Rcd 11956, 12008, para. 123 (2000).
210 Id.
211 See Alvarez Letter 1999.
212 See ‘‘Multiple Address Systems Spectrum
Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 21011
(2001).
213 See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
214 See ‘‘Auction of 1.4 GHz Bands Licenses
Scheduled for February 7, 2007,’’ public notice, 21
FCC Rcd 12393 (WTB 2006).
215 See ‘‘Auction of 1.4 GHz Band Licenses Closes;
Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 69,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
auction, the Commission defined ‘‘small
business’’ as an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling interests, had
average gross revenues that exceed $15
million but do not exceed $40 million for the
preceding three years, and a ‘‘very small
business’’ as an entity that, together with its
affiliates and controlling interests, has had
average annual gross revenues not exceeding
$15 million for the preceding three years.216
Neither of the two winning bidders sought
designated entity status.217
55. Incumbent 24 GHz Licensees. This
analysis may affect incumbent licensees who
were relocated to the 24 GHz band from the
18 GHz band, and applicants who wish to
provide services in the 24 GHz band. The
applicable SBA small business size standard
is that of Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite). This category
provides that such a company is small if it
employs no more than 1,500 persons.218 The
broader census data notwithstanding, we
believe that there are only two licensees in
the 24 GHz band that were relocated from the
18 GHz band, Teligent 219 and TRW, Inc. It
is our understanding that Teligent and its
related companies have fewer than 1,500
employees, though this may change in the
future. TRW is not a small entity. There are
approximately 122 licensees in the Rural
Radiotelephone Service, and the Commission
estimates that there are 122 or fewer small
entity licensees in the Rural Radiotelephone
Service that may be affected by the rules and
policies proposed herein.
56. Future 24 GHz Licensees. With respect
to new applicants in the 24 GHz band, we
have defined ‘‘small business’’ as an entity
that, together with controlling interests and
affiliates, has average annual gross revenues
for the three preceding years not exceeding
$15 million.220 ‘‘Very small business’’ in the
24 GHz band is defined as an entity that,
together with controlling interests and
affiliates, has average gross revenues not
exceeding $3 million for the preceding three
years.221 The SBA has approved these
definitions.222 The Commission will not
know how many licensees will be small or
very small businesses until the auction, if
required, is held.
57. Broadband Radio Service and
Educational Broadband Service. Broadband
Radio Service systems, previously referred to
as Multipoint Distribution Service (‘‘MDS’’)
public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 4714 (2007) (‘‘Auction
No. 69 Closing PN’’).
216 Auction No. 69 Closing PN, Attachment C.
217 See Auction No. 69 Closing PN.
218 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
219 Teligent acquired the DEMS licenses of
FirstMark, the only licensee other than TRW in the
24 GHz band whose license has been modified to
require relocation to the 24 GHz band.
220 Amendments to Parts 1, 2, 87 and 101 of the
Commission’s Rules To License Fixed Services at 24
GHz, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16934, 16967,
para 77 (2000) (‘‘24 GHz Report and Order’’); see
also 47 CFR 101.538(a)(2).
221 24 GHz Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
16967, para. 77; see also 47 CFR 101.538(a)(1).
222 See Letter from Gary M. Jackson, Assistant
Administrator, SBA, to Margaret W. Wiener, Deputy
Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division,
WTB, FCC (July 28, 2000).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
21559
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
and Multichannel Multipoint Distribution
Service (‘‘MMDS’’) systems, and ‘‘wireless
cable,’’ transmit video programming to
subscribers and provide two-way high speed
data operations using the microwave
frequencies of the Broadband Radio Service
(‘‘BRS’’) and Educational Broadband Service
(‘‘EBS’’) (previously referred to as the
Instructional Television Fixed Service
(‘‘ITFS’’)).223 In connection with the 1996
BRS auction, the Commission established a
small business size standard as an entity that
had annual average gross revenues of no
more than $40 million in the previous three
calendar years.224 The BRS auctions resulted
in 67 successful bidders obtaining licensing
opportunities for 493 Basic Trading Areas
(‘‘BTAs’’). Of the 67 auction winners, 61 met
the definition of a small business. BRS also
includes licensees of stations authorized
prior to the auction. At this time, we estimate
that of the 61 small business BRS auction
winners, 48 remain small business licensees.
In addition to the 48 small businesses that
hold BTA authorizations, there are
approximately 392 incumbent BRS licensees
that are considered small entities.225 After
adding the number of small business auction
licensees to the number of incumbent
licensees not already counted, we find that
there are currently approximately 440 BRS
licensees that are defined as small businesses
under either the SBA or the Commission’s
rules. In 2009, the Commission conducted
Auction 86, the sale of 78 licenses in the BRS
areas.226 The Commission offered three levels
of bidding credits: (i) A bidder with
attributed average annual gross revenues that
exceed $15 million and do not exceed $40
million for the preceding three years (small
business) will receive a 15 percent discount
on its winning bid; (ii) a bidder with
attributed average annual gross revenues that
exceed $3 million and do not exceed $15
million for the preceding three years (very
small business) will receive a 25 percent
discount on its winning bid; and (iii) a bidder
with attributed average annual gross
revenues that do not exceed $3 million for
the preceding three years (entrepreneur) will
receive a 35 percent discount on its winning
bid.227 Auction 86 concluded in 2009 with
the sale of 61 licenses.228 Of the ten winning
bidders, two bidders that claimed small
business status won 4 licenses; one bidder
that claimed very small business status won
three licenses; and two bidders that claimed
entrepreneur status won six licenses.
58. In addition, the SBA’s Cable Television
Distribution Services small business size
standard is applicable to EBS. There are
presently 2,032 EBS licensees. All but 100 of
these licenses are held by educational
institutions. Educational institutions are
included in this analysis as small entities.229
Thus, we estimate that at least 1,932
licensees are small businesses. Since 2007,
Cable Television Distribution Services have
been defined within the broad economic
census category of Wired
Telecommunications Carriers; that category
is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry
comprises establishments primarily engaged
in operating and/or providing access to
transmission facilities and infrastructure that
they own and/or lease for the transmission of
voice, data, text, sound, and video using
wired telecommunications networks.
Transmission facilities may be based on a
single technology or a combination of
technologies.’’230 The SBA has developed a
small business size standard for this category,
which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer
employees. To gauge small business
prevalence for these cable services we must,
however, use current census data that are
based on the previous category of Cable and
Other Program Distribution and its associated
size standard; that size standard was: all such
firms having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts.231 According to Census Bureau data
for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in
this previous category that operated for the
entire year.232 Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43
firms had receipts of $10 million or more but
less than $25 million.233 Thus, the majority
of these firms can be considered small.
59. Television Broadcasting. This
Economic Census category ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
broadcasting images together with sound.
These establishments operate television
broadcasting studios and facilities for the
programming and transmission of programs
to the public.’’ 234 The SBA has created the
following small business size standard for
Television Broadcasting firms: those having
$14 million or less in annual receipts.235 The
Commission has estimated the number of
licensed commercial television stations to be
1,395.236 In addition, according to
Commission staff review of the BIA
Publications, Inc., Master Access Television
Analyzer Database (BIA) on March 30, 2007,
about 986 of an estimated 1,395 commercial
television stations (or approximately 72
percent) had revenues of $13 million or
less.237 We therefore estimate that the
majority of commercial television
broadcasters are small entities.
60. We note, however, that in assessing
whether a business concern qualifies as small
under the above definition, business (control)
affiliations 238 must be included. Our
estimate, therefore, likely overstates the
number of small entities that might be
affected by our action, because the revenue
figure on which it is based does not include
or aggregate revenues from affiliated
companies. In addition, an element of the
definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the
entity not be dominant in its field of
operation. We are unable at this time to
define or quantify the criteria that would
establish whether a specific television station
is dominant in its field of operation.
Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses
to which rules may apply does not exclude
any television station from the definition of
a small business on this basis and is therefore
possibly over-inclusive to that extent.
61. In addition, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial educational (NCE) television
stations to be 390.239 These stations are nonprofit, and therefore considered to be small
entities.240
62. In addition, there are also 2,386 low
power television stations (LPTV).241 Given
the nature of this service, we will presume
that all LPTV licensees qualify as small
entities under the above SBA small business
size standard.
63. Radio Broadcasting. This Economic
Census category ‘‘comprises establishments
primarily engaged in broadcasting aural
programs by radio to the public.
Programming may originate in their own
223 Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the
Commission’s Rules with Regard to Filing
Procedures in the Multipoint Distribution Service
and in the Instructional Television Fixed Service
and Implementation of Section 309(j) of the
Communications Act—Competitive Bidding, MM
Docket No. 94–131 and PP Docket No. 93–253,
Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9589, 9593, para 7
(1995) (‘‘MDS Auction R&O’’).
224 47 CFR 21.961(b)(1).
225 47 U.S.C. 309(j). Hundreds of stations were
licensed to incumbent MDS licensees prior to
implementation of Section 309(j) of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 309(j). For
these pre-auction licenses, the applicable standard
is SBA’s small business size standard.
226 Auction of Broadband Radio Service (BRS)
Licenses, Scheduled for October 27, 2009, Notice
and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids,
Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for
Auction 86, public notice, 24 FCC Rcd 8277 (2009).
227 Id. at 8296.
228 Auction of Broadband Radio Service Licenses
Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction
86, Down Payments Due November 23, 2009, Final
Payments Due December 8, 2009, Ten-Day Petition
to Deny Period, public notice, 24 FCC Rcd 13572
(2009).
229 The term ‘‘small entity’’ within SBREFA
applies to small organizations (nonprofits) and to
small governmental jurisdictions (cities, counties,
towns, townships, villages, school districts, and
special districts with populations of less than
50,000). 5 U.S.C. 601(4)–(6). We do not collect
annual revenue data on EBS licensees.
230 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’
(partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110.
231 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
232 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size
of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005).
233 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
234 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘515120 Television Broadcasting’’ (partial
definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/
ND515120.HTM#N515120.
235 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120 (updated
for inflation in 2008).
236 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station
Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4,
2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/
Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC–280836A1.pdf.
237 We recognize that BIA’s estimate differs
slightly from the FCC total given supra.
238 ‘‘[Business concerns] are affiliates of each
other when one concern controls or has the power
to control the other or a third party or parties
controls or has the power to control both.’’ 13 CFR
21.103(a)(1).
239 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station
Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4,
2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/
Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC-280836A1.pdf.
240 See generally 5 U.S.C. 601(4), (6).
241 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station
Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4,
2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/
Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC-280836A1.pdf.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21560
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
studio, from an affiliated network, or from
external sources.’’ 242 The SBA has
established a small business size standard for
this category, which is: such firms having $7
million or less in annual receipts.243
According to Commission staff review of BIA
Publications, Inc.’s Master Access Radio
Analyzer Database on March 31, 2005, about
10,840 (95%) of 11,410 commercial radio
stations had revenues of $6 million or less.
Therefore, the majority of such entities are
small entities.
64. We note, however, that in assessing
whether a business concern qualifies as small
under the above size standard, business
affiliations must be included.244 In addition,
to be determined to be a ‘‘small business,’’ the
entity may not be dominant in its field of
operation.245 We note that it is difficult at
times to assess these criteria in the context
of media entities, and our estimate of small
businesses may therefore be over-inclusive.
65. Auxiliary, Special Broadcast and Other
Program Distribution Services. This service
involves a variety of transmitters, generally
used to relay broadcast programming to the
public (through translator and booster
stations) or within the program distribution
chain (from a remote news gathering unit
back to the station). The Commission has not
developed a definition of small entities
applicable to broadcast auxiliary licensees.
The applicable definitions of small entities
are those, noted previously, under the SBA
rules applicable to radio broadcasting
stations and television broadcasting
stations.246
66. The Commission estimates that there
are approximately 5,618 FM translators and
boosters.247 The Commission does not collect
financial information on any broadcast
facility, and the Department of Commerce
does not collect financial information on
these auxiliary broadcast facilities. We
believe that most, if not all, of these auxiliary
facilities could be classified as small
businesses by themselves. We also recognize
that most commercial translators and
boosters are owned by a parent station
which, in some cases, would be covered by
the revenue definition of small business
entity discussed above. These stations would
likely have annual revenues that exceed the
SBA maximum to be designated as a small
business ($7.0 million for a radio station or
$14.0 million for a TV station). Furthermore,
they do not meet the Small Business Act’s
definition of a ‘‘small business concern’’
because they are not independently owned
and operated.248
242 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘515112 Radio Stations’’; https://www.census.gov/
naics/2007/def/ND515112.HTM#N515112.
243 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515112 (updated
for inflation in 2008).
244 ‘‘Concerns and entities are affiliates of each
other when one controls or has the power to control
the other, or a third party or parties controls or has
the power to control both. It does not matter
whether control is exercised, so long as the power
to control exists.’’ 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1) (an SBA
regulation).
245 13 CFR 121.102(b) (an SBA regulation).
246 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 515112 and
515120.
247 See supra note 242.
248 See 15 U.S.C. 632.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
67. Cable Television Distribution Services.
Since 2007, these services have been defined
within the broad economic census category
of Wired Telecommunications Carriers; that
category is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry
comprises establishments primarily engaged
in operating and/or providing access to
transmission facilities and infrastructure that
they own and/or lease for the transmission of
voice, data, text, sound, and video using
wired telecommunications networks.
Transmission facilities may be based on a
single technology or a combination of
technologies.’’ 249 The SBA has developed a
small business size standard for this category,
which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer
employees. To gauge small business
prevalence for these cable services we must,
however, use current census data that are
based on the previous category of Cable and
Other Program Distribution and its associated
size standard; that size standard was: all such
firms having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts.250 According to Census Bureau data
for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in
this previous category that operated for the
entire year.251 Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43
firms had receipts of $10 million or more but
less than $25 million.252 Thus, the majority
of these firms can be considered small.
68. Cable Companies and Systems. The
Commission has also developed its own
small business size standards, for the
purpose of cable rate regulation. Under the
Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small cable company’’
is one serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers,
nationwide.253 Industry data indicate that, of
1,076 cable operators nationwide, all but
eleven are small under this size standard.254
In addition, under the Commission’s rules, a
‘‘small system’’ is a cable system serving
15,000 or fewer subscribers.255 Industry data
indicate that, of 6,635 systems nationwide,
5,802 systems have under 10,000 subscribers,
and an additional 302 systems have 10,000–
19,999 subscribers.256 Thus, under this
249 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’
(partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110.
250 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
251 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size
of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005).
252 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
253 47 CFR 76.901(e). The Commission
determined that this size standard equates
approximately to a size standard of $100 million or
less in annual revenues. Implementation of Sections
of the 1992 Cable Act: Rate Regulation, Sixth Report
and Order and Eleventh Order on Reconsideration,
10 FCC Rcd 7393, 7408 (1995).
254 These data are derived from: R.R. Bowker,
Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006, ‘‘Top 25
Cable/Satellite Operators,’’ pages A–8 & C–2 (data
current as of June 30, 2005); Warren
Communications News, Television & Cable
Factbook 2006, ‘‘Ownership of Cable Systems in the
United States,’’ pages D–1805 to D–1857.
255 47 CFR 76.901(c).
256 Warren Communications News, Television &
Cable Factbook 2008, ‘‘U.S. Cable Systems by
Subscriber Size,’’ page F–2 (data current as of Oct.
2007). The data do not include 851 systems for
which classifying data were not available.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
second size standard, most cable systems are
small.
69. Cable System Operators. The
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
also contains a size standard for small cable
system operators, which is ‘‘a cable operator
that, directly or through an affiliate, serves in
the aggregate fewer than 1 percent of all
subscribers in the United States and is not
affiliated with any entity or entities whose
gross annual revenues in the aggregate
exceed $250,000,000.’’ 257 The Commission
has determined that an operator serving
fewer than 677,000 subscribers shall be
deemed a small operator, if its annual
revenues, when combined with the total
annual revenues of all its affiliates, do not
exceed $250 million in the aggregate.258
Industry data indicate that, of 1,076 cable
operators nationwide, all but ten are small
under this size standard.259 We note that the
Commission neither requests nor collects
information on whether cable system
operators are affiliated with entities whose
gross annual revenues exceed $250
million,260 and therefore we are unable to
estimate more accurately the number of cable
system operators that would qualify as small
under this size standard.
70. Open Video Systems. The open video
system (‘‘OVS’’) framework was established in
1996, and is one of four statutorily
recognized options for the provision of video
programming services by local exchange
carriers.261 The OVS framework provides
opportunities for the distribution of video
programming other than through cable
systems. Because OVS operators provide
subscription services,262 OVS falls within the
SBA small business size standard covering
cable services, which is ‘‘Wired
Telecommunications Carriers.’’ 263 The SBA
has developed a small business size standard
for this category, which is: all such firms
having 1,500 or fewer employees. To gauge
small business prevalence for such services
we must, however, use current census data
that are based on the previous category of
257 47 U.S.C. 543(m)(2); see 47 CFR 76.901(f) &
nn. 1–3.
258 47 CFR 76.901(f); see public notice, FCC
Announces New Subscriber Count for the Definition
of Small Cable Operator, DA 01–158 (Cable
Services Bureau, Jan. 24, 2001).
259 These data are derived from: R.R. Bowker,
Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006, ‘‘Top 25
Cable/Satellite Operators,’’ pages A–8 & C–2 (data
current as of June 30, 2005); Warren
Communications News, Television & Cable
Factbook 2006, ‘‘Ownership of Cable Systems in the
United States,’’ pages D–1805 to D–1857.
260 The Commission does receive such
information on a case-by-case basis if a cable
operator appeals a local franchise authority’s
finding that the operator does not qualify as a small
cable operator pursuant to section 76.901(f) of the
Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR 76.909(b).
261 47 U.S.C. 571(a)(3)–(4). See Annual
Assessment of the Status of Competition in the
Market for the Delivery of Video Programming,
Thirteenth Annual Report, 24 FCC Rcd 542, 606
para. 135 (2009) (‘‘Thirteenth Annual Cable
Competition Report’’).
262 See 47 U.S.C. 573.
263 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’;
https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/
ND517110.HTM#N517110.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Cable and Other Program Distribution and its
associated size standard; that size standard
was: all such firms having $13.5 million or
less in annual receipts.264 According to
Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a
total of 1,191 firms in this previous category
that operated for the entire year.265 Of this
total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of
under $10 million, and 43 firms had receipts
of $10 million or more but less than $25
million.266 Thus, the majority of cable firms
can be considered small. In addition, we note
that the Commission has certified some OVS
operators, with some now providing
service.267 Broadband service providers
(‘‘BSPs’’) are currently the only significant
holders of OVS certifications or local OVS
franchises.268 The Commission does not have
financial or employment information
regarding the entities authorized to provide
OVS, some of which may not yet be
operational. Thus, again, at least some of the
OVS operators may qualify as small entities.
71. Cable Television Relay Service. This
service includes transmitters generally used
to relay cable programming within cable
television system distribution systems. This
cable service is defined within the broad
economic census category of Wired
Telecommunications Carriers; that category
is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry
comprises establishments primarily engaged
in operating and/or providing access to
transmission facilities and infrastructure that
they own and/or lease for the transmission of
voice, data, text, sound, and video using
wired telecommunications networks.
Transmission facilities may be based on a
single technology or a combination of
technologies.’’ 269 The SBA has developed a
small business size standard for this category,
which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer
employees. To gauge small business
prevalence for cable services we must,
however, use current census data that are
based on the previous category of Cable and
Other Program Distribution and its associated
size standard; that size standard was: all such
firms having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts.270 According to Census Bureau data
for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in
this previous category that operated for the
entire year.271 Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43
264 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size
of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005).
266 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
267 A list of OVS certifications may be found at
https://www.fcc.gov/mb/ovs/csovscer.html.
268 See Thirteenth Annual Cable Competition
Report, 24 FCC Rcd at 606–07 para. 135. BSPs are
newer firms that are building state-of-the-art,
facilities-based networks to provide video, voice,
and data services over a single network.
269 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’
(partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110.
270 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
271 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size
of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
265 U.S.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
firms had receipts of $10 million or more but
less than $25 million.272 Thus, the majority
of these firms can be considered small.
72. Multichannel Video Distribution and
Data Service. MVDDS is a terrestrial fixed
microwave service operating in the 12.2–12.7
GHz band. The Commission adopted criteria
for defining three groups of small businesses
for purposes of determining their eligibility
for special provisions such as bidding
credits. It defined a very small business as an
entity with average annual gross revenues not
exceeding $3 million for the preceding three
years; a small business as an entity with
average annual gross revenues not exceeding
$15 million for the preceding three years; and
an entrepreneur as an entity with average
annual gross revenues not exceeding $40
million for the preceding three years.273
These definitions were approved by the
SBA.274 On January 27, 2004, the
Commission completed an auction of 214
MVDDS licenses (Auction No. 53). In this
auction, ten winning bidders won a total of
192 MVDDS licenses.275 Eight of the ten
winning bidders claimed small business
status and won 144 of the licenses. The
Commission also held an auction of MVDDS
licenses on December 7, 2005 (Auction 63).
Of the three winning bidders who won 22
licenses, two winning bidders, winning 21 of
the licenses, claimed small business
status.276
73. Amateur Radio Service. These licensees
are held by individuals in a noncommercial
capacity; these licensees are not small
entities.
74. Aviation and Marine Services. Small
businesses in the aviation and marine radio
services use a very high frequency (‘‘VHF’’)
marine or aircraft radio and, as appropriate,
an emergency position-indicating radio
beacon (and/or radar) or an emergency
locator transmitter. The Commission has not
developed a small business size standard
specifically applicable to these small
businesses. For purposes of this analysis, the
Commission uses the SBA small business
size standard for the category Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
272 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts
of $25 million or more.
273 Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the
Commission’s Rules to Permit Operation of NGSO
FSS Systems Co-Frequency with GSO and
Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band Frequency
Range; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to
Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the 12.2–
12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast Satellite
Licenses and their Affiliates; and Applications of
Broadwave USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and
Satellite Receivers, Ltd. to provide A Fixed Service
in the 12.2–12.7 GHz Band, ET Docket No. 98–206,
Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second
Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9614, 9711, para. 252
(2002).
274 See Letter from Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration,
to Margaret W. Wiener, Chief, Auctions and
Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (Feb.13,
2002).
275 See ‘‘Multichannel Video Distribution and
Data Service Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 19 FCC
Rcd 1834 (2004).
276 See Auction of Multichannel Video
Distribution and Data Service Licenses Closes;
Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 63,
public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 19807 (2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21561
Satellite), which is 1,500 or fewer
employees.277 Most applicants for
recreational licenses are individuals.
Approximately 581,000 ship station licensees
and 131,000 aircraft station licensees operate
domestically and are not subject to the radio
carriage requirements of any statute or treaty.
For purposes of our evaluations in this
analysis, we estimate that there are up to
approximately 712,000 licensees that are
small businesses (or individuals) under the
SBA standard. In addition, between
December 3, 1998 and December 14, 1998,
the Commission held an auction of 42 VHF
Public Coast licenses in the 157.1875–
157.4500 MHz (ship transmit) and 161.775–
162.0125 MHz (coast transmit) bands. For
purposes of the auction, the Commission
defined a ‘‘small’’ business as an entity that,
together with controlling interests and
affiliates, has average gross revenues for the
preceding three years not to exceed $15
million dollars. In addition, a ‘‘very small’’
business is one that, together with controlling
interests and affiliates, has average gross
revenues for the preceding three years not to
exceed $3 million dollars.278 There are
approximately 10,672 licensees in the Marine
Coast Service, and the Commission estimates
that almost all of them qualify as ‘‘small’’
businesses under the above special small
business size standards.
75. Personal Radio Services. Personal radio
services provide short-range, low power
radio for personal communications, radio
signaling, and business communications not
provided for in other services. The Personal
Radio Services include spectrum licensed
under Part 95 of our rules.279 These services
include Citizen Band Radio Service (‘‘CB’’),
General Mobile Radio Service (‘‘GMRS’’),
Radio Control Radio Service (‘‘R/C’’), Family
Radio Service (‘‘FRS’’), Wireless Medical
Telemetry Service (‘‘WMTS’’), Medical
Implant Communications Service (‘‘MICS’’),
Low Power Radio Service (‘‘LPRS’’), and
Multi-Use Radio Service (‘‘MURS’’).280 There
are a variety of methods used to license the
spectrum in these rule parts, from licensing
by rule, to conditioning operation on
successful completion of a required test, to
site-based licensing, to geographic area
licensing. Under the RFA, the Commission is
required to make a determination of which
small entities are directly affected by the
rules being proposed. Since all such entities
are wireless, we apply the definition of
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite), pursuant to which a small
entity is defined as employing 1,500 or fewer
277 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210.
of the Commission’s Rules
Concerning Maritime Communications, Third
Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19853 (1998).
279 47 CFR Part 90.
280 The Citizens Band Radio Service, General
Mobile Radio Service, Radio Control Radio Service,
Family Radio Service, Wireless Medical Telemetry
Service, Medical Implant Communications Service,
Low Power Radio Service, and Multi-Use Radio
Service are governed by subpart D, subpart A,
subpart C, subpart B, subpart H, subpart I, subpart
G, and subpart J, respectively, of Part 95 of the
Commission’s rules. See generally 47 CFR Part 95.
278 Amendment
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21562
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
persons.281 Many of the licensees in these
services are individuals, and thus are not
small entities. In addition, due to the mostly
unlicensed and shared nature of the
spectrum utilized in many of these services,
the Commission lacks direct information
upon which to base an estimation of the
number of small entities under an SBA
definition that might be directly affected by
the proposed rules.
76. Public Safety Radio Services. Public
Safety radio services include police, fire,
local government, forestry conservation,
highway maintenance, and emergency
medical services.282 There are a total of
approximately 127,540 licensees in these
services. Governmental entities 283 as well as
private businesses comprise the licensees for
these services. All governmental entities with
populations of less than 50,000 fall within
the definition of a small entity.284
77. Internet Service Providers. The 2007
Economic Census places these firms, whose
services might include voice over Internet
protocol (VoIP), in either of two categories,
depending on whether the service is
provided over the provider’s own
telecommunications connections (e.g. cable
and DSL, ISPs), or over client-supplied
telecommunications connections (e.g. dial-up
ISPs). The former are within the category of
Wired Telecommunications Carriers,285
which has an SBA small business size
standard of 1,500 or fewer employees.286 The
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
281 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210.
282 With the exception of the special emergency
service, these services are governed by subpart B of
part 90 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 90.15–
90.27. The police service includes approximately
27,000 licensees that serve State, county, and
municipal enforcement through telephony (voice),
telegraphy (code) and teletype and facsimile
(printed material). The fire radio service includes
approximately 23,000 licensees comprised of
private volunteer or professional fire companies as
well as units under governmental control. The local
government service that is presently comprised of
approximately 41,000 licensees that are State,
county, or municipal entities that use the radio for
official purposes not covered by other public safety
services. There are approximately 7,000 licensees
within the forestry service which is comprised of
licensees from State departments of conservation
and private forest organizations who set up
communications networks among fire lookout
towers and ground crews. The approximately 9,000
State and local governments are licensed to
highway maintenance service provide emergency
and routine communications to aid other public
safety services to keep main roads safe for vehicular
traffic. The approximately 1,000 licensees in the
Emergency Medical Radio Service (‘‘EMRS’’) use the
39 channels allocated to this service for emergency
medical service communications related to the
delivery of emergency medical treatment. 47 CFR
90.15–90.27. The approximately 20,000 licensees in
the special emergency service include medical
services, rescue organizations, veterinarians,
handicapped persons, disaster relief organizations,
school buses, beach patrols, establishments in
isolated areas, communications standby facilities,
and emergency repair of public communications
facilities. 47 CFR 90.33–90.55.
283 47 CFR 1.1162.
284 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
285 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’,
https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/
ND517110.HTM#N517110.
286 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (updated
for inflation in 2008).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
latter are within the category of All Other
Telecommunications,287 which has a size
standard of annual receipts of $25 million or
less.288 The most current Census Bureau data
for all such firms, however, are the 2002 data
for the previous census category called
Internet Service Providers.289 That category
had a small business size standard of $21
million or less in annual receipts, which was
revised in late 2005 to $23 million. The 2002
data show that there were 2,529 such firms
that operated for the entire year.290 Of those,
2,437 firms had annual receipts of under $10
million, and an additional 47 firms had
receipts of between $10 million and
$24,999,999.291 Consequently, we estimate
that the majority of ISP firms are small
entities.
78. The ISP industry has changed
dramatically since 2002. The 2002 data cited
above may therefore include entities that no
longer provide Internet access service and
may exclude entities that now provide such
service. To ensure that this (IRFA/FRFA)
describes the universe of small entities that
our action might affect, we discuss in turn
several different types of entities that might
be providing Internet access service.
79. We note that, although we have no
specific information on the number of small
entities that provide Internet access service
over unlicensed spectrum, we include these
entities in our IRFA/FRFA.
IV. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
80. With certain exceptions, the
Commission’s Schedule of Regulatory Fees
applies to all Commission licensees and
regulatees. Most licensees will be required to
count the number of licenses or call signs
authorized, complete and submit an FCC
Form 159 Remittance Advice, and pay a
regulatory fee based on the number of
licenses or call signs.292 Interstate telephone
287 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘517919 All Other Telecommunications’’; https://
www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/
ND517919.HTM#N517919.
288 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517919 (updated
for inflation in 2008).
289 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘518111 Internet Service Providers’’; https://
www.census.gov/eped/naics02/def/NDEF518.HTM.
290 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’
Table 4, NAICS code 518111 (issued Nov. 2005).
291 An additional 45 firms had receipts of $25
million or more.
292 See 47 CFR 1.1162 for the general exemptions
from regulatory fees. E.g., Amateur radio licensees
(except applicants for vanity call signs) and
operators in other non-licensed services (e.g.,
Personal Radio, part 15, ship and aircraft).
Governments and non-profit (exempt under section
501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code) entities are
exempt from payment of regulatory fees and need
not submit payment. Non-commercial educational
broadcast licensees are exempt from regulatory fees
as are licensees of auxiliary broadcast services such
as low power auxiliary stations, television auxiliary
service stations, remote pickup stations and aural
broadcast auxiliary stations where such licenses are
used in conjunction with commonly owned noncommercial educational stations. Emergency Alert
System licenses for auxiliary service facilities are
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
service providers must compute their annual
regulatory fee based on their interstate and
international end-user revenue using
information they already supply to the
Commission in compliance with the Form
499–A, Telecommunications Reporting
Worksheet, and they must complete and
submit the FCC Form 159. Compliance with
the fee schedule will require some licensees
to tabulate the number of units (e.g., cellular
telephones, pagers, cable TV subscribers)
they have in service when they complete and
submit the FCC Form 159. Licensees
ordinarily will keep a list of the number of
units they have in service as part of their
normal business practices. No additional
outside professional skills are required to
complete the FCC Form 159, and it can be
completed by the employees responsible for
an entity’s business records.
81. As discussed previously in this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
concluded in its FY 2009 regulatory fee cycle
that licensees filing their annual regulatory
fee payments must begin the process by
entering the Commission’s Fee Filer system
with a valid FRN and password. In some
instances, it will be necessary to use a
specific FRN and password that is linked to
a particular regulatory fee bill. Going
forward, the submission of hardcopy Form
159 documents will not be permitted for
making a regulatory fee payment during the
regulatory fee cycle. By requiring licensees to
use Fee Filer to begin the regulatory fee
payment process, errors resulting from
illegible handwriting on hardcopy Form
159’s will be reduced, and we will create an
electronic record of licensee payment
attributes that are more easily traced than
those payments that are simply mailed in
with a hardcopy Form 159.
82. Licensees and regulatees are advised
that failure to submit the required regulatory
fee in a timely manner will subject the
licensee or regulatee to a late payment
penalty of 25 percent in addition to the
required fee.293 If payment is not received,
new or pending applications may be
dismissed, and existing authorizations may
be subject to rescission.294 Further, in
accordance with the DCIA, Federal agencies
may bar a person or entity from obtaining a
Federal loan or loan insurance guarantee if
that person or entity fails to pay a delinquent
debt owed to any Federal agency.295
Nonpayment of regulatory fees is a debt owed
to the United States pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
3711 et seq., and the DCIA. Appropriate
also exempt as are instructional television fixed
service licensees. Regulatory fees are automatically
waived for the licensee of any translator station
that: (1) Is not licensed to, in whole or in part, and
does not have common ownership with, the
licensee of a commercial broadcast station; (2) does
not derive income from advertising; and (3) is
dependent on subscriptions or contributions from
members of the community served for support.
Receive only earth station permittees are exempt
from payment of regulatory fees. A regulatee will
be relieved of its fee payment requirement if its
total fee due, including all categories of fees for
which payment is due by the entity, amounts to less
than $10.
293 47 CFR 1.1164.
294 47 CFR 1.1164(c).
295 Public Law 104–134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
enforcement measures, as well as
administrative and judicial remedies, may be
exercised by the Commission. Debts owed to
the Commission may result in a person or
entity being denied a Federal loan or loan
guarantee pending before another Federal
agency until such obligations are paid.296
83. The Commission’s rules currently
provide for relief in exceptional
circumstances. Persons or entities may
request a waiver, reduction or deferment of
payment of the regulatory fee.297 However,
timely submission of the required regulatory
fee must accompany requests for waivers or
reductions. This will avoid any late payment
penalty if the request is denied. The fee will
be refunded if the request is granted. In
exceptional and compelling instances (e.g.,
where payment of the regulatory fee along
with the waiver or reduction request could
result in reduction of service to a community
CFR 1.1164.
294 47 CFR 1.1164(c).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
293 47
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
or other financial hardship to the licensee),
the Commission will defer payment in
response to a request filed with the
appropriate supporting documentation.
V. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
84. The RFA requires an agency to describe
any significant alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its approach, which
may include the following four alternatives,
among others: (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation,
or simplification of compliance or reporting
requirements under the rule for small
entities; (3) the use of performance, rather
than design, standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21563
for small entities.298 In this NPRM, we seek
comment on alternatives that might simplify
our fee procedures or otherwise benefit filers,
including small entities, while remaining
consistent with our statutory responsibilities
in this proceeding.
85. Several categories of licensees and
regulatees are exempt from payment of
regulatory fees. Also, waiver procedures
provide regulatees, including small entity
regulatees, relief in exceptional
circumstances. We note that small entities
should be assisted by our implementation of
the Fee Filer program, and that we have
continued our practice of exempting fees
whose total sum owed is less than $10.00.
VI. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
86. None.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
295 Public
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
Law 104–134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).
26APP1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.006
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21564
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
21565
EP26AP10.007
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
EP26AP10.008
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
21566
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. 2010–9553 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
No. 108; Lamp, Reflective Devices and
Associated Equipment; Denial of
Petition for Rulemaking
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Denial of petition for
rulemaking.
SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC
(BMW) requested a modification to the
motorcycle headlighting system location
requirements for a single headlamp with
multiple light sources. The current
standard requires that the light sources
contained in a single motorcycle
headlamp containing multiple light
sources be located on the vertical
centerline of the vehicle or horizontally
disposed about the vertical centerline
and mounted at the same height. BMW
requested that the location requirements
be based on the axes of reference instead
of the light sources.
For compliance testing purposes, the
agency utilizes the manufacturer’s
specified optical axis marking. As
NHTSA explained in a letter of
interpretation to Mr. Kiminori,1 the
optical axis is determined by the
manufacturer in the certification
process. Our lighting standard does not
currently have requirements to specify
where the optical axis marking must be
located and we note that a modification
of the standard, as requested by BMW,
would effectively remove the location
requirements for a single motorcycle
headlamp with multiple light sources.
Therefore, NHTSA is denying BMW’s
petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards (Phone: 202–366–0098; FAX:
202–366–7002).
For legal issues, you may call Mr. J.
Edward Glancy Office of the Chief
Counsel (Phone: 202–366–2992; FAX:
202–366–3820).
You may send mail to these officials
at: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of polar bears through Letters of
Authorization issued under 16 U.S.C.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Apr 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 108; Lamps,
reflective devices, and associated
equipment, establishes lighting
requirements for motor vehicles.2
Motorcycle headlamp systems that
contain a single headlamp with multiple
light sources must be arranged
according to the requirements of
paragraph S7.9.6.2.3 S7.9.6.2(a) requires
that ‘‘If the headlamp contains more
than one light source, each light source
shall be mounted on the vertical
centerline with the upper beam no
higher than the lower beam, or
horizontally disposed about the vertical
centerline and mounted at the same
height.’’
BMW Group Petition
On October 10, 2008, BMW North
America, LLC (BMW) petitioned the
agency requesting that the requirements
for a motorcycle headlighting system,
containing a single headlamp, with
multiple light sources, be modified.
BMW stated that the purpose of its
petition was to harmonize the
requirements of FMVSS No. 108 with
the similar European Communities
(ECE) regulation No. 53 requirements,
which have location requirements
relative to the vehicle based on the axis
of reference rather than the physical
filaments in the lamp.
Specifically, BMW requested that
paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 4 of the
reorganized standard be amended from
the sentence quoted above in
‘‘Background,’’ to read as follows:
S10.17.1.1.2 If the headlamp contains more
than one light source, each axis of reference
must be located on the vertical centerline
with the upper beam no higher than the
lower beam, or horizontally disposed about
the vertical centerline and located at the
same height.5
BMW stated that ‘‘when using
modern, state of the art asymmetrical
reflectors, the center of reference is,
because of the reflector surface, slightly
differently located compared to the
2 49
CFR 571.108 (2009).
the amended standard, this requirement is
found in paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 and paragraph
S10.17.1.1.3. See 72 FR 68234 (Dec. 4, 2007). In a
December 2007 final rule, NHTSA rewrote and
reorganized FMVSS No. 108 to provide a more
straightforward and logical presentation of the
applicable regulatory requirements. Id. The
effective date of those amendments has been
delayed to December 1, 2012. 74 FR 58214 (Nov.
12, 2009).
4 Paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 of the reorganized
standard is identical to the same sentence currently
found in paragraph S7.9.6.2(a), i.e., the requirement
prior to the 2007 reorganization of the standard. See
72 FR 68234, 68283.
5 Id. (emphasis added).
21567
original light source. The center of
reference is the basis for all photometric
measurement, which are required by the
ECE regulation.’’ BMW also stated that
its requested modification would
harmonize FMVSS No. 108 with ECE
Regulation No. 53, and would have no
negative impact on traffic safety.
Analysis
In consideration of this petition, the
agency reviewed the use of the defined
term ‘‘axis of reference’’ in order to
evaluate the appropriate use of this term
within paragraph S10.14.1.1.2.
The axis of reference is defined as the
following:
Axis of reference means the characteristic
axis of the lamp for use as the direction of
reference (H = 0°, V = 0°) for angles of field
or photometric measurements and for
installing the lamp on the vehicle.6
The term ‘‘axis of reference’’ is used in
two key areas within the standard. First,
the axis of reference is used in the
determination of the effective projected
luminous lens area.7 The other key area
in which this term is used is, in
determination of the mounting height of
various lamps. Lamps mounted with
their axis of reference less than 750
millimeters (mm) above the road surface
may meet the photometric requirements
for the test points located below 5°
down at 5° down, rather than at the
specified required downward angle.
This general concept applies to various
lamps and is listed in the table of
photometric requirements for each lamp
to which it applies.8
The agency has also used the term
‘‘axis of reference’’ in a key guidance
letter. In a letter to Mr. Kiminori, the
agency explains the flexibility
manufacturers have in the establishment
of the optical marking and therefore the
location of the axis of reference. The
agency stated, ‘‘Paragraph S7.8.5.3(f)
[paragraph numeration prior to the
technical rewrite of 2007] of FMVSS No.
108 requires that a visually/optically
aimed headlamp include a mark or
markings identifying the optical axis of
the headlamp. The location of this mark
or markings is to be determined by the
3 In
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6 49
CFR 571.108 S4, Definitions.
projected luminous lens area means
the area of the orthogonal projection of the effective
light-emitting surface of a lamp on a plane
perpendicular to a defined direction relative to the
axis of reference. Unless otherwise specified, the
direction is coincident with the axis of reference.’’
Id.
8 See 72 FR 68234, 68301–68327 (Tables V, VII,
VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIV, XVI, XVII) (noting in Table
footnotes that where various lamps are ‘‘mounted
with their axis of reference less than 750 mm above
the road surface, photometry requirements below 5°
down may be met at 5° down rather than at the
specified requirement downward angle’’).
7 ‘‘Effective
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21536-21567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9553]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 10-87; FCC 10-51]
Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission will revise its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in
order to recover an amount of $335,794,000 that Congress has required
the Commission to collect for fiscal year 2010. Section 9 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, provides for the annual
assessment and collection of regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2) and
9(b)(3), respectively, for annual ``Mandatory Adjustments'' and
``Permitted Amendments'' to the Schedule of Regulatory Fees.
DATES: Comments are due May 4, 2010, and reply comments are due May 11,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MD Docket No. 10-87,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web site: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include MD Docket No. 10-87 in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to 9300 East
Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-
class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing
Director at (202) 418-0444.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Adopted: April 12, 2010.
Released: April 13, 2010.
By the Commission.
Table of Contents
Paragraph
I. Introduction............................................. 1
A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology........ 2
1. AM and FM Radio Stations......................... 4
2. Submarine Cable Methodology...................... 5
B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service 7
Television Broadcasters................................
C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, 8
Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters...................
D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service.... 9
E. Administrative and Operational Issues................ 10
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer....................... 11
2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees... 12
a. Pre-Bills.................................... 12
II. Procedural Matters...................................... 13
A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets....................... 14
B. Assessment Notifications............................. 15
1. Media Services Licensees......................... 15
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments.... 18
C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process........... 21
1. Cable Television Subscribers..................... 21
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers............... 22
3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers 23
(``ITSP'').........................................
D. Payment of Regulatory Fees........................... 24
1. Lock Box Bank.................................... 24
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments................. 25
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees....................... 26
4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates...... 27
[[Page 21537]]
E. Enforcement.......................................... 28
F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.............. 30
G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis..... 31
H. Congressional Review Act Analysis.................... 32
I. Ex Parte Rules....................................... 33
J. Filing Requirements.................................. 34
III. Ordering Clauses....................................... 39
Appendix A Calculation of FY 2010 Revenue Requirements and
Pro-Rata Fees
Appendix B FY 2010 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
Appendix C Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010
Appendix D Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go
Into Determining Station Signal Contours and Associated
Population Coverages
Appendix E Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Appendix F FY 2009 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
I. Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we propose to collect
$335,794,000 in regulatory fees for Fiscal Year (``FY'') 2010, pursuant
to section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the
``Act''). Section 9 regulatory fees are mandated by Congress and are
collected to recover the regulatory costs associated with the
Commission's enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and
international activities.\1\ The annual regulatory fee amount to be
collected is established each year in the Commission's Annual
Appropriations Act which is adopted by Congress and signed by the
President and which funds the Commission.\2\ In this annual regulatory
fee proceeding, we retain many of the established methods, policies,
and procedures for collecting section 9 regulatory fees adopted by the
Commission in prior years. Consistent with our established practice, we
intend to collect these regulatory fees during an August 2010 filing
window in order to collect the required amount by the end of our fiscal
year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a).
\2\ See Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-
117 for the FY 2010 appropriations act language for the Commission
establishing the amount of $335,794,000 of offsetting collections to
be assessed and collected by the Commission pursuant to section 9 of
the Communications Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology
2. In our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment, we will use the same
section 9 regulatory fee assessment methodology adopted in FY 2009.
Each fiscal year, the Commission proportionally allocates the total
amount that must be collected via section 9 regulatory fees. The
results of our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment methodology (including
a comparison to the prior year's results) are contained in Appendix A.
To collect the $335,794,000 required by Congress, we adjust the FY 2009
amount downward by 1.8 percent and allocate this amount across the
various fee categories. Consistent with past practice, we then divide
the FY 2010 amount by the number of estimated payment units in each fee
category to determine the unit fee.\3\ As in prior years, for cases
involving small fees, e.g., licenses that are renewed over a multiyear
term, we divide the resulting unit fee by the term of the license and
then rounded these unit fees consistent with the requirements of
section 9(b)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In many instances, the regulatory fee amount is a flat fee
per licensee or regulatee. In some instances, the fee amount
represents a per-unit fee (such as for International Bearer
Circuits), a per-unit subscriber fee (such as for Cable, Commercial
Mobile Radio Service (``CMRS'') Cellular/Mobile and CMRS Messaging),
or a fee factor per revenue dollar (Interstate Telecommunications
Service Provider (``ITSP'') fee). The payment unit is the measure
upon which the fee is based, such as a licensee, regulatee, or
subscriber fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. In calculating the FY 2010 regulatory fees listed in Appendix B,
we further adjusted the FY 2009 list of payment units (see Appendix C)
based upon licensee databases, industry and trade group projections, as
well as prior year payment information. In some instances, Commission
licensee databases were used; in other instances, actual prior year
payment records and/or industry and trade association projections were
used in determining the payment unit counts.\4\ Where appropriate, we
adjusted and rounded our final estimates to take into consideration
events that may impact the number of units for which regulatees submit
payment, such as waivers and exemptions that may be filed in FY 2010,
and fluctuations in the number of licenses or station operators due to
economic, technical, or other reasons. Our estimated FY 2010 payment
units, therefore, are based on several variable factors that are
relevant to each fee category. The fee rate also may be rounded or
adjusted slightly to account for these variables.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The databases we consulted are the following: The
Commission's Universal Licensing System (``ULS''), International
Bureau Filing System (``IBFS''), Consolidated Database System
(``CDBS'') and Cable Operations and Licensing System (``COALS''). We
also consulted reports generated within the Commission such as the
Wireline Competition Bureau's Trends in Telephone Service and the
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Numbering Resource Utilization
Forecast and Annual CMRS Competition Report, as well as industry
sources including, but not limited to, Television & Cable Factbook
by Warren Publishing, Inc. and the Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook
by Reed Elsevier, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AM and FM Radio Stations
4. As in previous years, we consider the additional factors of
facility attributes and the population served by each radio station in
determining regulatory fees for AM and FM radio stations. The
calculation of the population served is determined by coupling current
U.S. Census Bureau data with technical and engineering data, as
detailed in Appendix D. Consequently, the population served, as well as
the class and type of service (AM or FM), will continue to determine
the amount of regulatory fee to be paid.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In addition, beginning in FY 2005, we established a
procedure by which we set regulatory fees for AM and FM radio and
VHF and UHF television Construction Permits each year at an amount
no higher than the lowest regulatory fee for a licensed station in
that respective service category. For example, in FY 2009 the
regulatory fee for an AM radio station Construction Permit was no
higher than the regulatory fee for an AM Class C radio station
serving a population of less than 25,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Submarine Cable Methodology
5. In its Second Report and Order (``Submarine Cable Order'')
released on March 24, 2009, the Commission adopted a new submarine
cable bearer circuit methodology that assessed regulatory fees on a per
cable landing license basis, with higher fees for larger submarine
cable systems and lower fees for smaller systems, without
distinguishing between common
[[Page 21538]]
carriers and non-common carriers.\6\ For all other categories of
international bearer circuits--common carrier and non-common carrier
satellite facilities and common carrier terrestrial facilities--the
Submarine Cable Order retained the existing regulatory fee methodology
of assessing fees on a per 64 kbps circuit basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal
Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4208, para. 1 (March
24, 2009) (``Submarine Cable Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. In the Submarine Cable Order and in the FY 2009 Regulatory Fees
Report and Order,\7\ the Commission allocated the total FY 2009 bearer
circuit expected revenue into two revenue components: A submarine cable
revenue component (87.6 percent) and a satellite/terrestrial revenue
component (12.4 percent) using the Consensus Proposal allocation
adopted by the Commission in the Submarine Cable Order.\8\ According to
the Consensus Proposal, this allocation of 87.6 percent (submarine
cable) and 12.4 percent (satellite/terrestrial) was calculated by
determining the revenue obligations of submarine cable systems with the
revenue obligations of the satellite and terrestrial facilities using
the FY 2008 revenue requirement as its basis.\9\ Since we do not have
any additional information that would lead us to change this allocation
percentage for FY 2010, we propose to continue to use the allocation
percentages of 87.6 percent (submarine cable) and 12.4 percent
(satellite and terrestrial) for calculating FY 2010 submarine cable
regulatory fees. Consistent with the Commission's annual process of
updating its schedule of regulatory fees with recent data, however, we
reserve the right to re-examine the allocation percentages described
above on an annual basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See FY 2009 Report and Order at Appendix B.
\8\ See Submarine Cable Order at paragraphs 1 and 6.
\9\ Id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service Television
Broadcasters
7. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, we stated that, beginning in FY
2010, we plan to collect regulatory fees from digital broadcasters, and
we sought comment on this plan to collect regulatory fees on full-power
digital broadcast stations beginning with FY 2010, i.e., the fiscal
year after the nation-wide transition date on June 12, 2009.\10\ Since
the digital transition on June 12, 2009 has eliminated the distinction
between digital and analog full-service television stations, the
digital-only exemption will no longer apply beginning in FY 2010.
Beginning in FY 2010, we will collect annual regulatory fees from all
digital full-service television stations, and the ``digital-only''
exemption will no longer be applicable. Also, because this is the first
year following the Commission's transition to digital full service
television, it is possible that some facilities may be operating under
a Special Temporary Authority (STA) beginning on October 1, 2009 until
the digital license is issued. For FY 2010 regulatory fee purposes,
these facilities operating under an STA will be considered to be fully
operational licensed facilities and will be obligated to pay the same
regulatory fee as a licensed full-service television station.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id. at para. 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV
Translators/Boosters
8. Although the digital transition of full-service television
stations was completed on June 12, 2009, the digital transition for Low
Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters is still voluntary, and
there is currently no set date for the completion of this transition.
Historically, the discussion of digital transition conversion with
respect to regulatory fees has applied only to full-service television
stations, and therefore, the elimination of the ``digital only''
exemption described in the above paragraph has no impact on this class
of regulatees. Because the digital transition in the Low Power, Class
A, and TV Translators/Booster facilities is voluntary and the
transition will occur over a period time, it is possible that some
facilities will convert from analog to digital more quickly than
others. During this interim transition period, licensees of Low Power,
Class A, and TV Translator/Booster facilities could be operating in
analog mode, in digital mode, or in an analog and digital simulcast
mode. For regulatory fee purposes, a fee will be assessed for each
facility operating either in an analog or digital mode. In instances in
which a licensee is operating in both an analog and digital mode as a
simulcast, a single regulatory fee will be assessed for this analog
facility that has a digital companion channel. As greater numbers of
facilities convert to digital mode, the Commission will provide revised
instructions on how regulatory fees will be assessed.
D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service
9. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (``CMRS'') Messaging Service,
which replaced the CMRS One-Way Paging fee category in 1997, includes
all narrowband services.\11\ Since 1997, the number of subscribers has
declined from 40.8 million to 6.5 million, and there does not appear to
be any sign of recovery to the subscriber levels of 1997-1999.
Maintaining the fee at the existing level of $.08 per subscriber is the
minimum reasonable and appropriate action to take under the prevailing
circumstances in the paging industry. We propose in FY 2010 to continue
maintaining the regulatory fee rate at $0.08 per subscriber due to the
declining subscriber base in this industry.\12\ We seek comment on this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal
Year 1997, MD Docket No. 96-186, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17161,
17184-85, para. 60 (1997) (``FY 1997 Report and Order'').
\12\ Between FY 1997 and FY 2009, the subscriber base in the
paging industry declined 84 percent from 40.8 million to 6.5 million
subscribers, according to FY 2009 collections data as of September
30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Administrative and Operational Issues
10. In FY 2009, the Commission implemented several changes in
procedures which simplified the payment and reconciliation processes of
FY 2009 regulatory fees. These changes proved to be very helpful to
both licensees and to the Commission, and we propose in the following
paragraphs to expand upon these improvements. In FY 2010, the
Commission will promote greater use of technology (and less use of
paper) to improve the regulatory fee notification and collection
process. We seek general comment on ways to promote greater use of
technology in collecting regulatory fees.
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer
11. In FY 2009, we instituted a mandatory filing requirement using
the Commission's electronic filing and payment system (also known as
``Fee Filer'').\13\ Licensees filing their annual regulatory fee
payments were required to begin the process by entering the
Commission's Fee Filer system with a valid FRN and password. This
change was beneficial to both licensees and to the Commission. For
example, for licensees, the mandatory use of Fee Filer eliminated the
need to manually complete and submit a hardcopy Form 159, and for the
Commission, the data in electronic format made it much easier to
process payments more efficiently and effectively. Because of the
success of this process change, we propose to continue to make the use
of Fee Filer for filing annual regulatory fees mandatory. We seek
comment on this proposal. As
[[Page 21539]]
in FY 2009, the mandatory use of Fee Filer does not mean that licensees
are expected to pay only through Fee Filer--it is only mandatory for
licensees to begin the process of filing their annual regulatory fees
using Fee Filer. This is one reason it is very important for licensees
to have a current and valid FRN address on file in the Commission's
Registration System (CORES). Going forward, only Form 159-E documents
generated from Fee Filer will be permitted when sending in a regulatory
fee payment to U.S. Bank. These Form 159-E's not only will reduce
errors resulting from illegible handwriting on hardcopy Form 159's,
but, because they are generated from Fee Filer, these forms also will
create an electronic record of licensee payment attributes that are
more easily tracked and searched than hardcopy Form 159's that are
completed manually and mailed to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 20 and 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees
a. Pre-bills
12. In prior years, the Commission mailed pre-bills via surface
mail to licensees in select regulatory fee categories: Interstate
telecommunications service providers (``ITSPs''), Geostationary
(``GSO'') and Non-Geostationary (``NGSO'') satellite space station
licensees,\14\ holders of Cable Television Relay Service (``CARS'')
licenses, and Earth Station licensees.\15\ The remaining regulatees did
not receive pre-bills. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, the Commission
decided to have the attributes of these pre-bills viewed in Fee Filer,
rather than mailing pre-bills out to licensees via surface mail.\16\
Although the overall response to this procedural change was positive,
it was apparent that a greater effort should have been made to inform
licensees that they would not be receiving a hardcopy regulatory fee
bill in the mail. In FY 2010, the Commission will continue to reduce
its use of hardcopy documents by not mailing out annual regulatory fee
bills, but the Commission is seeking to increase its efforts in
notifying licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be
mailed out. We seek comment on how to most efficiently and effectively
notify licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be mailed
out, but that, instead, the amount and attributes of the bills will be
available in Fee Filer for review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Geostationary orbit space station (``GSO'') licensees
received regulatory fee pre-bills for satellites that (1) were
licensed by the Commission and operational on or before October 1 of
the respective fiscal year; and (2) were not co-located with and
technically identical to another operational satellite on that date
(i.e., were not functioning as a spare satellite). Non-geostationary
orbit space station (``NGSO'') licensees received regulatory fee
pre-bills for systems that were licensed by the Commission and
operational on or before October 1 of the respective fiscal year.
\15\ An assessment is a proposed statement of the amount of
regulatory fees owed by an entity to the Commission (or proposed
subscriber count to be ascribed for purposes of setting the entity's
regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the Commission's
accounting system as a current debt. A pre-bill is considered an
account receivable in the Commission's accounting system. Pre-bills
reflect the amount owed and have a payment due date of the last day
of the regulatory fee payment window. Consequently, if a pre-bill is
not paid by the due date, it becomes delinquent and is subject to
our debt collection procedures. See also 47 CFR 1.1161(c),
1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
\16\ See FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 24, 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Procedural Matters
13. Included below are procedural items as well as our current
payment and collection methods, which we have revised over the past
several years to expedite the processing of regulatory fee payments. We
include these payments and collection procedures here as a useful way
of reminding regulatory fee payers and the public about these aspects
of the annual regulatory fee collection process.
A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets
14. Each year we post public notices and fact sheets pertaining to
regulatory fees on our Web site. These documents contain information
about the payment due date and the regulatory fee payment procedures.
We will continue to post this information on https://www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html, but as in previous years we will not send out public
notices and fact sheets to regulatees en masse.
B. Assessment Notifications
1. Media Services Licensees
15. Beginning in FY 2003, we sent fee assessment notifications via
surface mail to media services entities on a per-facility basis.\17\
The notifications provided the assessed fee amount for the facility in
question, as well as the data attributes that determined the fee
amount. We have since refined this initiative with improved
results.\18\ Consistent with procedures used last year, we will mail
out media assessment notifications to licensees in FY 2010 at their
primary record of contact populated in our Consolidated Database System
(``CDBS''), and to a secondary record of contact, if available.\19\
However, after FY 2010, as part of the Commission's initiative to
emphasize electronic filing and reduce paper usage, the Commission will
stop mailing out media notification assessments to media licensees.
Instead the Commission will rely more on its various Web sites,
including the Commission-authorized Web site at https://www.fccfees.com,
to notify licensees of pending annual regulatory fees and to update or
correct any information regarding their facilities and their fee-exempt
status.\20\ We seek comment on our proposal to discontinue sending out
media notification letters after the FY 2010 regulatory fee season.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ As stated previously at footnote 41, an assessment is a
proposed statement of the amount of regulatory fees owed by an
entity to the Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be
ascribed for purposes of setting the entity's regulatory fee) but it
is not entered into the Commission's accounting system as a current
debt.
\18\ Some of those refinements have been to provide licensees
with a Commission-authorized Web site to update or correct any
information concerning their facilities, and to amend their fee-
exempt status, if need be. Also, our notifications now provide
licensees with a telephone number to call in the event that they
need customer assistance. The notifications themselves have been
refined so that licensees of fewer than four facilities receive
individual fee assessment postcards for their facilities; whereas
licensees of four or more facilities now receive a single assessment
letter that lists all of their facilities and the associated
regulatory fee obligation for each facility.
\19\ We will issue fee assessments for AM and FM Radio Stations,
AM and FM Construction Permits, FM Translators/Boosters, VHF and UHF
Television Stations, VHF and UHF Television Construction Permits,
Satellite Television Stations, Low Power Television (``LPTV'')
Stations and LPTV Translators/Boosters, to the extent that
applicants, permittees and licensees of such facilities do not
qualify as government entities or non-profit entities. As in prior
years, fee assessments will not be issued for broadcast auxiliary
stations.
\20\ If there is a change of address for the facility, it is the
licensee's responsibility to make the address change in the Media
Bureau's CDBS system, as well as in the Commission's Registration
System (``CORES''). There is also a Commission-authorized Web site
that media services licensees can use to view and update their
exempt status (https://www.fccfees.com).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. The decision to discontinue mailing media notifications
beginning in FY 2011 is consistent with the Commission's effort to
become more electronic and less paper-oriented. However, the Commission
understands that not all media licensees are able to access the
Commission's various electronic Web sites once the hardcopy
notification letters are discontinued in FY 2011. Therefore, to be
receptive to the needs of these licensees, the Commission will leave
the comment and reply comment period open until September 30, 2010 on
the specific issue of whether the media notification letters should be
discontinued in FY 2011. Because this decision does not impact FY 2010
regulatory fees, we will be addressing this issue in the Commission's
FY 2011 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking after we have had the chance to
review the various
[[Page 21540]]
comments and reply comments that have been submitted. In addition to
raising this issue in this document, the Commission will also remind
media licensees of this proposed change in notification procedures when
it sends out letters to media licensees later in the fiscal year
regarding their FY 2010 regulatory fee obligations. To ensure that the
comments of all potentially affected persons are properly included in
the record, media licensees should submit their comments and reply
comments on this issue as follows:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must
be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
17. Although the Commission will mail media assessment
notifications to licensees in FY 2010, all licensees (including media
services) will be required to use Fee Filer as the first step in paying
their regulatory fee obligations. The notification assessments provide
licensees with the same media data attributes found on Fee Filer;
however, receiving this information in FY 2010 via mail notification
does not obviate, nor should it be considered a substitute for, using
Fee Filer as the first step in filing and paying annual regulatory
fees. As explained previously, licensees must first log onto the
Commission's Fee Filer system to begin the process of filing and paying
their regulatory fees, but once in Fee Filer, licensees may pay by
check or money order, credit card, or wire transfer. A Form 159-E
generated from Fee Filer is required, even when mailing in the annual
regulatory fee payment.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments
18. As we have done in prior years, we will mail an initial
assessment letter to Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers
using data from the Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast (``NRUF'')
report that is based on ``assigned'' number counts that have been
adjusted for porting to net Type 0 ports (``in'' and ``out'').\21\ The
letter will include a listing of the carrier's Operating Company
Numbers (``OCNs'') upon which the assessment is based.\22\ The letters
will not include OCNs with their respective assigned number counts, but
rather, an aggregate total of assigned numbers for each carrier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal
Year 2005 and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for
Fiscal Year 2004, MD Docket Nos. 05-59 and 04-73, Report and Order
and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 12259, 12264, paragraphs
38-44 (2005).
\22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. If the carrier does not agree with the number of subscribers
listed on the initial assessment letter, providers will have an
opportunity within a specific timeframe to revise their subscriber
counts by submitting supporting documentation to substantiate the
change. However, instead of mailing the revised figures, providers will
be asked to access Fee Filer and follow the instructions provided in
order to submit their revised subscriber count along with any
supporting documentation.\23\ The Commission will then review the
revised count and supporting documentation and either approve or
disapprove the submission in Fee Filer. The provider will be able to
review the decision online in Fee Filer. If the submission is
disapproved, the Commission will also attempt to contact the provider
so that the provider will have an opportunity to discuss its revised
subscriber count and/or provide additional supporting documentation. If
we receive no response or correction to the initial assessment letter,
or we do not reverse the disapproval of the provider's revised count
submission, we will expect the fee payment to be based on the number of
subscribers listed on the initial assessment. Once the timeframe for
revision has passed, the subscriber counts will be finalized. These
subscriber counts will then be the basis upon which CMRS regulatory
fees will be expected. Providers will be able to view their final
subscriber counts online in Fee Filer. A final CMRS assessment letter
will not be mailed out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ In the supporting documentation, the provider will need to
state a reason for the change, such as a purchase or sale of a
subsidiary, the date of the transaction, and any other pertinent
information that will help to justify a reason for the change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
20. Because some carriers do not file the NRUF report, they may not
receive an initial letter of assessment. In these instances, the
carriers should compute their fee payment using the standard
methodology \24\ that is currently in place for CMRS Wireless services
(e.g., compute their subscriber counts as of December 31, 2009), and
submit their fee payment accordingly. Whether a carrier receives an
assessment letter or not, the Commission reserves the right to audit
the number of subscribers for which regulatory fees are paid. In the
event that the Commission determines that the number of subscribers
paid is inaccurate, the Commission will bill the carrier for the
difference between what was paid and what should have been paid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory
Fees Fact Sheet: What You Owe--Commercial Wireless Services for FY
2009 at 1 (rel. September 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process
1. Cable Television Subscribers
21. We will continue to permit cable television operators to base
their regulatory fee payment on their company's aggregate year-end
subscriber count, rather than requiring them to sub-report subscriber
counts on a per community unit identifier (``CUID'') basis.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers
22. In FY 2006, we streamlined the CMRS payment process by
eliminating the requirement for CMRS providers to identify their
individual call signs when making their regulatory fee payment, instead
allowing CMRS providers to pay their regulatory fees only at the
aggregate subscriber level without having to identify their various
call signs.\25\ We will continue this practice in FY 2010. In FY 2007,
we consolidated the CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories into
one fee category with a single fee code, thereby eliminating the
requirement for CMRS providers to separate their subscriber counts into
CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories during the regulatory fee
payment process. This consolidation of fee categories enabled the
Commission to process payments more quickly and accurately. For FY
2010, we will continue this practice of combining the CMRS cellular and
[[Page 21541]]
CMRS mobile fee categories into one regulatory fee category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal
Year 2006, MD Docket No. 06-68, Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 8092,
8105, para. 48 (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (``ITSP'')
23. In FY 2007, we adopted a proposal to round lines 14 (total
subject revenues) and 16 (total regulatory fee owed) on FCC Form 159-W
to the nearest dollar. This revision enabled the Commission to process
the ITSP regulatory fee payments more quickly because rounding was
performed in a consistent manner and eliminated processing issues that
occurred in prior years. In FY 2010, we will continue rounding lines 14
and 16 when calculating the FY 2010 ITSP fee obligation. In addition,
as in FY 2009, we will continue the practice of not mailing out Form
159-W via surface mail.
D. Payment of Regulatory Fees
1. Lock Box Bank
24. All lock box payments to the Commission for FY 2010 will be
processed by U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri, and payable to the FCC.
During the regulatory fee season, for those licensees paying by check,
money order, or by credit card using Form 159-E remittance advice, the
fee payment and Form 159-E remittance advice should be mailed to the
following address: Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees,
P.O. Box 979084, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Additional payment options
and instructions are posted at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html.
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments
25. The receiving bank for all wire payments is the Federal Reserve
Bank, New York, New York (TREAS NYC). When making a wire transfer,
regulatees must fax a copy of their Fee Filer generated Form 159-E to
U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri at (314) 418-4232 at least one hour
before initiating the wire transfer (but on the same business day), so
as to not delay crediting their account. Regulatees should discuss
arrangements (including bank closing schedules) with their bankers
several days before they plan to make the wire transfer to allow
sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed before
the deadline. Complete instructions for making wire payments are posted
at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/wiretran.html.
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees
26. Regulatees whose total FY 2010 regulatory fee liability,
including all categories of fees for which payment is due, is less than
$10 are exempted from payment of FY 2010 regulatory fees.
4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates
27. The Commission will accept fee payments made in advance of the
window for the payment of regulatory fees. The responsibility for
payment of fees by service category is as follows:
Media Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for initial
construction permits (including construction permits for digital
television stations) that were granted on or before October 1, 2009 for
AM/FM radio stations, analog VHF/UHF full service television stations,
and satellite television stations. Regulatory fees must be paid for all
broadcast facility licenses granted on or before October 1, 2009. In
instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after
October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of
the permit or license as of the fee due date.
Wireline (Common Carrier) Services: Regulatory fees must
be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1,
2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned
after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder
of the permit or license as of the fee due date. We note that audio
bridging service providers are included in this category.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Audio bridging services are toll teleconferencing services,
and audio bridging service providers are required to contribute
directly to the universal service fund based on revenues from these
services. On June 30, 2008, the Commission released the InterCall
Order, in which the Commission stated that InterCall, Inc. and all
similarly situated audio bridging service providers are required to
contribute directly to the universal service fund. See Request for
Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service
Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10731 (2008)
(``InterCall Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wireless Services: CMRS cellular, mobile, and messaging
services (fees based on number of subscribers or telephone number
count): Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were
granted on or before October 1, 2009. The number of subscribers, units,
or telephone numbers on December 31, 2009 will be used as the basis
from which to calculate the fee payment. In instances where a permit or
license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or
license as of the fee due date.
The first eleven regulatory fee categories in our Schedule
of Regulatory Fees (see Appendix B) pay ``small multi-year wireless
regulatory fees.'' Entities pay these regulatory fees in advance for
the entire amount of their five-year or ten-year term of initial
license, and only pay regulatory fees again when the license is renewed
or a new license is obtained. We include these fee categories in our
Schedule of Regulatory Fees to publicize our estimates of the number of
``small multi-year wireless'' licenses that will be renewed or newly
obtained in FY 2010.
Multichannel Video Programming Distributor Services (cable
television operators and CARS licensees): Regulatory fees must be paid
for the number of basic cable television subscribers as of December 31,
2009.\27\ Regulatory fees also must be paid for CARS licenses that were
granted on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or
license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or
license as of the fee due date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Cable television system operators should compute their
basic subscribers as follows: Number of single family dwellings +
number of individual households in multiple dwelling unit
(apartments, condominiums, mobile home parks, etc.) paying at the
basic subscriber rate + bulk rate customers + courtesy and free
service. Note: Bulk-Rate Customers = Total annual bulk-rate charge
divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households.
Operators may base their count on ``a typical day in the last full
week'' of December 2009, rather than on a count as of December 31,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for
earth stations, geostationary orbit space stations and non-
geostationary orbit satellite systems that were licensed and
operational on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit
or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009,
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or
license as of the fee due date.
International Services: Submarine Cable Systems:
Regulatory fees for submarine cable systems are to be paid on a per
cable landing license basis based on circuit capacity as of December
31, 2009. In instances where a license is transferred or assigned after
October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of
the license as of the fee due date.
International Services: Terestrial and Satellite Services:
Finally, regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be
paid by facilities-based common carriers that have active (used or
leased) international bearer circuits as of December 31, 2009 in any
terrestrial or satellite transmission facility for the provision of
service to an end user or resale carrier, which includes active
circuits to themselves or to their affiliates. In addition, non-common
carrier satellite operators must
[[Page 21542]]
pay a fee for each circuit sold or leased to any customer, including
themselves or their affiliates, other than an international common
carrier authorized by the Commission to provide U.S. international
common carrier services. ``Active circuits'' for these purposes include
backup and redundant circuits as of December 31, 2009. Whether circuits
are used specifically for voice or data is not relevant for these
purposes in determining that they are active circuits. In instances
where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1,
2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or
license as of the fee due date.
E. Enforcement
28. To be considered timely, regulatory fee payments must be
received and stamped at the lockbox bank by the last day of the
regulatory fee filing window. Section 9(c) of the Act requires us to
impose an additional charge as a penalty for late payment of any
regulatory fee.\28\ A late payment penalty of 25 percent of the unpaid
amount of the required regulatory fee will be assessed on the first day
following the deadline date for filing of these fees. Failure to pay
regulatory fees and/or any late penalty will subject regulatees to
sanctions, including those set forth in section 1.1910 of the
Commission's rules \29\ and in the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 (``DCIA'').\30\ We also assess administrative processing charges
on delinquent debts to recover additional costs incurred in processing
and handling the related debt pursuant to the DCIA and section
1.1940(d) of the Commission's rules.\31\ These administrative
processing charges will be assessed on any delinquent regulatory fee,
in addition to the 25 percent late charge penalty. In case of partial
payments (underpayments) of regulatory fees, the licensee will be given
credit for the amount paid, but if it is later determined that the fee
paid is incorrect or not timely paid, then the 25 percent late charge
penalty (and other charges and/or sanctions, as appropriate) will be
assessed on the portion that is not paid in a timely manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 47 U.S.C. 159(c).
\29\ See 47 CFR 1.1910.
\30\ Delinquent debt owed to the Commission triggers application
of the ``red light rule'' which requires offsets or holds on pending
disbursements. 47 CFR 1.1910. In 2004, the Commission adopted rules
implementing the requirements of the DCIA. See Amendment of Parts 0
and 1 of the Commission's Rules, MD Docket No. 02-339, Report and
Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6540 (2004); 47 CFR part 1, subpart O, Collection
of Claims Owed the United States.
\31\ 47 CFR 1.1940(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
29. We will withhold action on any applications or other requests
for benefits filed by anyone who is delinquent in any non-tax debts
owed to the Commission (including regulatory fees) and will ultimately
dismiss those applications or other requests if payment of the
delinquent debt or other satisfactory arrangement for payment is not
made.\32\ Failure to pay regulatory fees can also result in the
initiation of a proceeding to revoke any and all authorizations held by
the entity responsible for paying the delinquent fee(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 47 CFR 1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
30. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (``IRFA'') is
contained in Appendix E. Comments to the IRFA must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and filed by the deadlines for comments on the
Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Notice, including the
IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
31. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not contain proposed
information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (``PRA''), Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it
does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for
small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506 (c) (4). Completion of the 159 family of forms required by
the Commission's regulatory fee payment process is already approved by
the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060-
0589 and 3060-0949.
H. Congressional Review Act Analysis
32. The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to Congress and the Government Accountability Office
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Congressional Review Act is
contained in Title II, 251, of the CWAAA; see Public Law 104-121,
Title II, 251, 110 Stat. 868.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Ex Parte Rules
33. This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the
requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.\34\ Ex
parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with
Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when
presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum
summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of
the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed.
More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments
presented is generally required.\35\ Additional rules pertaining to
oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 47 CFR 1.1206(b); see also 47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1203.
\35\ See 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Filing Requirements
34. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may
file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on
the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal
Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See
Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
35. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using
the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
36. Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an
original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or
rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must
be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be
[[Page 21543]]
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
People With Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).
37. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington,
DC 20554. These documents will also be available free online, via ECFS.
Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word, and/or Adobe
Acrobat.
38. Accessibility Information. To request information in accessible
formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and
Braille), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice),
(202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document can also be downloaded in Word and
Portable Document Format (``PDF'') at: https://www.fcc.gov.
III. Ordering Clauses
39. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and
(j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is hereby adopted.
40. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in Appendix E, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[[Page 21544]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.000
[[Page 21545]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.001
[[Page 21546]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.002
[[Page 21547]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.003
[[Page 21548]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.004
[[Page 21549]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.005
BILLING CODE 6712-01-C?>
[[Page 21550]]
Appendix C
Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010
In order to calculate individual service fees for FY 2010, we
adjusted FY 2009 payment units for each service to more accurately
reflect expected FY 2010 payment liabilities. We obtained our
updated estimates through a variety of means. For example, we used
Commission licensee data bases, actual prior year payment records
and industry and trade association projections when available. The
databases we consulted include our Universal Licensing System
(``ULS''), International Bureau Filing System (``IBFS''),
Consolidated Database System (``CDBS'') and Cable Operations and
Licensing System (``COALS''), as well as reports generated within
the Commission such as the Wireline Competition Bureau's Trends in
Telephone Service and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's
Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast.
We sought verification for these estimates from multiple sources
and, in all cases we compared FY 2010 estimates with actual FY 2009
payment units to ensure that our revised estimates were reasonable.
Where appropriate, we adjusted and/or rounded our final estimates to
take into consideration the fact that certain variables that impact
on the number of payment units cannot yet be estimated with
sufficient accuracy. These include an unknown number of waivers and/
or exemptions that may occur in FY 2010 and the fact that, in many
services, the number of actual licensees or station operators
fluctuates from time to time due to economic, technical, or other
reasons. When we note, for example, that our estimated FY 2010
payment units are based on FY 2009 actual payment units, it does not
necessarily mean that our FY 2010 projection is exactly the same
number as FY 2009. We have either rounded the FY 2010 number or
adjusted it slightly to account for these variables.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee category Sources of payment unit estimates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Mobile (All), Microwave, Based on Wireless Telecommunications
218-219 MHz, Marine (Ship & Bureau (``WTB'') projections of new
Coast), Aviation (Aircraft & applications and renewals taking into
Ground), GMRS, Amateur consideration existing Commission
Vanity Call Signs, Domestic licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft)
Public Fixed. and Marine (Ship) estimates have been
adjusted to take into consideration the
licensing of portions of these services
on a voluntary basis.
CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services Based on WTB projection reports, and FY
09 payment data.
CMRS Messaging Services...... Based on WTB reports, and FY 09 payment
data.
AM/FM Radio Stations......... Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
units.
UHF/VHF Television Stations.. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
units.
AM/FM/TV Construction Permits Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
units.
LPTV, Translators and Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
Boosters, Class A Television. exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
units.
Broadcast Auxiliaries........ Based on actual FY 2009 payment units.
BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS)...... Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2009
payment units.
LMDS......................... Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2009
payment units.
Cable Television Relay Based on data from Media Bureau's COALS
Service (``CARS'') Stations. data base and actual FY 2009 payment
units.
Cable Television System Based on publicly available data sources
Subscribers. for estimated subscriber counts and
actual FY 2009 payment units.
Interstate Telecommunication Based on FCC Form 499-Q data for the four
Service Providers. quarters of calendar year 2009, the
Wireline Competition Bureau projected
the amount of calendar year 2009 revenue
that will be reported on 2010 FCC Form
499-A worksheets in April 2010.
Earth Stations............... Based on International Bureau (``IB'')
licensing data and actual FY 2009
payment units.
Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs) Based on IB data reports and actual FY
2009 payment units.
International Bearer Circuits Based on IB reports and submissions by
licensees.
Submarine Cable Licenses..... Based on IB license information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix D
Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go Into Determining
Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages
AM Stations
For stations with nondirectional daytime antennas, the
theoretical radiation was used at all azimuths. For stations with
directional daytime antennas, specific information on each day
tower, including field ratio, phasing, spacing and orientation was
retrieved, as well as the theoretical pattern root-mean-square of
the radiation in all directions in the horizontal plane (``RMS'')
figure milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @ 1 km) for the antenna system.
The standard, or modified standard if pertinent, horizontal plane
radiation pattern was calculated using techniques and methods
specified in 73.150 and 73.152 of the Commission's rules.\1\
Radiation values were calculated for each of 360 radials around the
transmitter site. Next, estimated soil conductivity data was
retrieved from a database representing the information in FCC Figure
R3.\2\ Using the calculated horizontal radiation values, and the
retrieved soil conductivity data, the distance to the principal
community (5 mV/m) contour was predicted for each of the 360
radials. The resulting distance to principal community contours were
used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was
accomplished by determining which 2,000 block centroids were
contained in the polygon. (A block centroid is the center point of a
small area containing population as computed by the U.S. Census
Bureau.) The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks
represents the total population for the predicted principal
community coverage area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 47 CFR 73.150 and 73.152.
\2\ See Map of Estimated Effective Ground Conductivity in the
United States, 47 CFR 73.190 Figure R3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FM Stations
The greater of the horizontal or vertical effective radiated
power (``ERP'') (kW) and respective height above average terrain
(``HAAT'') (m) combination was used. Where the antenna height above
mean sea level (``HAMSL'') was available, it was used in lieu of the
average HAAT figure to calculate specific HAAT figures for each of
360 radials under study. Any available directional pattern
information was applied as well, to produce a radial-specific ERP
figure. The HAAT and ERP figures were used in conjunction with the
Field Strength (50-50) propagation curves specified in 47 CFR 73.313
of the Commission's rules to predict the distance to the principal
community (70 dBu (decibel above 1 microVolt per meter) or 3.17 mV/
m) contour for each of the 360 radials.\3\ The resulting distance to
principal community contours were used to form a geographical
polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which
2,000 block centroids were contained in the polygon. The sum of the
population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total
population for the predicted principal community coverage area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 47 CFR 73.313.
[[Page 21551]]
---------------------------------------------------