Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010, 21536-21567 [2010-9553]

Download as PDF 21536 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations. tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an unfunded mandate. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule. Dated: January 22, 2010. Ervin J. Barchenger, Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region. Unfunded Mandates This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943 Act of 1934, as amended, provides for the annual assessment and collection of regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2) and 9(b)(3), respectively, for annual ‘‘Mandatory Adjustments’’ and ‘‘Permitted Amendments’’ to the Schedule of Regulatory Fees. DATES: Comments are due May 4, 2010, and reply comments are due May 11, 2010. Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010 ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MD Docket No. 10–87, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Federal Communications Commission’s Web site: https:// www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include MD Docket No. 10–87 in the subject line of the message. • Mail: Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing Director at (202) 418–0444. SUMMARY: The Commission will revise its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in order to recover an amount of $335,794,000 that Congress has required the Commission to collect for fiscal year 2010. Section 9 of the Communications SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining. Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the Federal Register on Wednesday, April 21, 2010. [FR Doc. 2010–9574 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [MD Docket No. 10–87; FCC 10–51] Adopted: April 12, 2010. Released: April 13, 2010. By the Commission. Table of Contents WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Paragraph I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................... A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................... 1. AM and FM Radio Stations ................................................................................................................................................... 2. Submarine Cable Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service Television Broadcasters .......................................................................... C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters .................................................... D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service .............................................................................................................. E. Administrative and Operational Issues ....................................................................................................................................... 1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer ................................................................................................................................................... 2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees ................................................................................................................... a. Pre-Bills ........................................................................................................................................................................... II. Procedural Matters ............................................................................................................................................................................... A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets ................................................................................................................................................... B. Assessment Notifications ............................................................................................................................................................. 1. Media Services Licensees ...................................................................................................................................................... 2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments .............................................................................................................. C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process ............................................................................................................................ 1. Cable Television Subscribers ................................................................................................................................................ 2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers ................................................................................................................................... 3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (‘‘ITSP’’) ................................................................................................ D. Payment of Regulatory Fees ......................................................................................................................................................... 1. Lock Box Bank ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments ....................................................................................................................................... 3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees ................................................................................................................................................. 4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates .................................................................................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 1 2 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 15 18 21 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 21537 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules Paragraph E. Enforcement .................................................................................................................................................................................. F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis .................................................................................................................... H. Congressional Review Act Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ I. Ex Parte Rules ................................................................................................................................................................................ J. Filing Requirements ....................................................................................................................................................................... III. Ordering Clauses ................................................................................................................................................................................. Appendix A Calculation of FY 2010 Revenue Requirements and Pro-Rata Fees Appendix B FY 2010 Schedule of Regulatory Fees Appendix C Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010 Appendix D Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go Into Determining Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages Appendix E Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Appendix F FY 2009 Schedule of Regulatory Fees WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS I. Introduction 1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we propose to collect $335,794,000 in regulatory fees for Fiscal Year (‘‘FY’’) 2010, pursuant to section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). Section 9 regulatory fees are mandated by Congress and are collected to recover the regulatory costs associated with the Commission’s enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and international activities.1 The annual regulatory fee amount to be collected is established each year in the Commission’s Annual Appropriations Act which is adopted by Congress and signed by the President and which funds the Commission.2 In this annual regulatory fee proceeding, we retain many of the established methods, policies, and procedures for collecting section 9 regulatory fees adopted by the Commission in prior years. Consistent with our established practice, we intend to collect these regulatory fees during an August 2010 filing window in order to collect the required amount by the end of our fiscal year. A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology 2. In our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment, we will use the same section 9 regulatory fee assessment methodology adopted in FY 2009. Each fiscal year, the Commission proportionally allocates the total amount that must be collected via section 9 regulatory fees. The results of our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment methodology (including a comparison to the prior year’s results) are contained in Appendix A. To collect the $335,794,000 required by Congress, we 1 47 U.S.C. 159(a). Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111–117 for the FY 2010 appropriations act language for the Commission establishing the amount of $335,794,000 of offsetting collections to be assessed and collected by the Commission pursuant to section 9 of the Communications Act. 2 See VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 adjust the FY 2009 amount downward by 1.8 percent and allocate this amount across the various fee categories. Consistent with past practice, we then divide the FY 2010 amount by the number of estimated payment units in each fee category to determine the unit fee.3 As in prior years, for cases involving small fees, e.g., licenses that are renewed over a multiyear term, we divide the resulting unit fee by the term of the license and then rounded these unit fees consistent with the requirements of section 9(b)(2) of the Act. 3. In calculating the FY 2010 regulatory fees listed in Appendix B, we further adjusted the FY 2009 list of payment units (see Appendix C) based upon licensee databases, industry and trade group projections, as well as prior year payment information. In some instances, Commission licensee databases were used; in other instances, actual prior year payment records and/ or industry and trade association projections were used in determining the payment unit counts.4 Where appropriate, we adjusted and rounded our final estimates to take into 3 In many instances, the regulatory fee amount is a flat fee per licensee or regulatee. In some instances, the fee amount represents a per-unit fee (such as for International Bearer Circuits), a per-unit subscriber fee (such as for Cable, Commercial Mobile Radio Service (‘‘CMRS’’) Cellular/Mobile and CMRS Messaging), or a fee factor per revenue dollar (Interstate Telecommunications Service Provider (‘‘ITSP’’) fee). The payment unit is the measure upon which the fee is based, such as a licensee, regulatee, or subscriber fee. 4 The databases we consulted are the following: The Commission’s Universal Licensing System (‘‘ULS’’), International Bureau Filing System (‘‘IBFS’’), Consolidated Database System (‘‘CDBS’’) and Cable Operations and Licensing System (‘‘COALS’’). We also consulted reports generated within the Commission such as the Wireline Competition Bureau’s Trends in Telephone Service and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau’s Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast and Annual CMRS Competition Report, as well as industry sources including, but not limited to, Television & Cable Factbook by Warren Publishing, Inc. and the Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook by Reed Elsevier, Inc. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28 30 31 32 33 34 39 consideration events that may impact the number of units for which regulatees submit payment, such as waivers and exemptions that may be filed in FY 2010, and fluctuations in the number of licenses or station operators due to economic, technical, or other reasons. Our estimated FY 2010 payment units, therefore, are based on several variable factors that are relevant to each fee category. The fee rate also may be rounded or adjusted slightly to account for these variables. 1. AM and FM Radio Stations 4. As in previous years, we consider the additional factors of facility attributes and the population served by each radio station in determining regulatory fees for AM and FM radio stations. The calculation of the population served is determined by coupling current U.S. Census Bureau data with technical and engineering data, as detailed in Appendix D. Consequently, the population served, as well as the class and type of service (AM or FM), will continue to determine the amount of regulatory fee to be paid.5 2. Submarine Cable Methodology 5. In its Second Report and Order (‘‘Submarine Cable Order’’) released on March 24, 2009, the Commission adopted a new submarine cable bearer circuit methodology that assessed regulatory fees on a per cable landing license basis, with higher fees for larger submarine cable systems and lower fees for smaller systems, without distinguishing between common 5 In addition, beginning in FY 2005, we established a procedure by which we set regulatory fees for AM and FM radio and VHF and UHF television Construction Permits each year at an amount no higher than the lowest regulatory fee for a licensed station in that respective service category. For example, in FY 2009 the regulatory fee for an AM radio station Construction Permit was no higher than the regulatory fee for an AM Class C radio station serving a population of less than 25,000. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21538 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS carriers and non-common carriers.6 For all other categories of international bearer circuits—common carrier and non-common carrier satellite facilities and common carrier terrestrial facilities—the Submarine Cable Order retained the existing regulatory fee methodology of assessing fees on a per 64 kbps circuit basis. 6. In the Submarine Cable Order and in the FY 2009 Regulatory Fees Report and Order,7 the Commission allocated the total FY 2009 bearer circuit expected revenue into two revenue components: A submarine cable revenue component (87.6 percent) and a satellite/terrestrial revenue component (12.4 percent) using the Consensus Proposal allocation adopted by the Commission in the Submarine Cable Order.8 According to the Consensus Proposal, this allocation of 87.6 percent (submarine cable) and 12.4 percent (satellite/terrestrial) was calculated by determining the revenue obligations of submarine cable systems with the revenue obligations of the satellite and terrestrial facilities using the FY 2008 revenue requirement as its basis.9 Since we do not have any additional information that would lead us to change this allocation percentage for FY 2010, we propose to continue to use the allocation percentages of 87.6 percent (submarine cable) and 12.4 percent (satellite and terrestrial) for calculating FY 2010 submarine cable regulatory fees. Consistent with the Commission’s annual process of updating its schedule of regulatory fees with recent data, however, we reserve the right to re-examine the allocation percentages described above on an annual basis. beginning in FY 2010. Beginning in FY 2010, we will collect annual regulatory fees from all digital full-service television stations, and the ‘‘digitalonly’’ exemption will no longer be applicable. Also, because this is the first year following the Commission’s transition to digital full service television, it is possible that some facilities may be operating under a Special Temporary Authority (STA) beginning on October 1, 2009 until the digital license is issued. For FY 2010 regulatory fee purposes, these facilities operating under an STA will be considered to be fully operational licensed facilities and will be obligated to pay the same regulatory fee as a licensed full-service television station. C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters 8. Although the digital transition of full-service television stations was completed on June 12, 2009, the digital transition for Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters is still voluntary, and there is currently no set date for the completion of this transition. Historically, the discussion of digital transition conversion with respect to regulatory fees has applied only to full-service television stations, and therefore, the elimination of the ‘‘digital only’’ exemption described in the above paragraph has no impact on this class of regulatees. Because the digital transition in the Low Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Booster facilities is voluntary and the transition will occur over a period time, it is possible that some facilities will convert from analog to digital more quickly than B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital others. During this interim transition Full Service Television Broadcasters period, licensees of Low Power, Class A, and TV Translator/Booster facilities 7. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, could be operating in analog mode, in we stated that, beginning in FY 2010, digital mode, or in an analog and digital we plan to collect regulatory fees from simulcast mode. For regulatory fee digital broadcasters, and we sought purposes, a fee will be assessed for each comment on this plan to collect facility operating either in an analog or regulatory fees on full-power digital digital mode. In instances in which a broadcast stations beginning with FY 2010, i.e., the fiscal year after the nation- licensee is operating in both an analog wide transition date on June 12, 2009.10 and digital mode as a simulcast, a single regulatory fee will be assessed for this Since the digital transition on June 12, analog facility that has a digital 2009 has eliminated the distinction companion channel. As greater numbers between digital and analog full-service of facilities convert to digital mode, the television stations, the digital-only Commission will provide revised exemption will no longer apply instructions on how regulatory fees will 6 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory be assessed. Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4208, para. 1 (March 24, 2009) (‘‘Submarine Cable Order’’). 7 See FY 2009 Report and Order at Appendix B. 8 See Submarine Cable Order at paragraphs 1 and 6. 9 Id. at 6. 10 Id. at para. 13. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service 9. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (‘‘CMRS’’) Messaging Service, which replaced the CMRS One-Way Paging fee category in 1997, includes all PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 narrowband services.11 Since 1997, the number of subscribers has declined from 40.8 million to 6.5 million, and there does not appear to be any sign of recovery to the subscriber levels of 1997–1999. Maintaining the fee at the existing level of $.08 per subscriber is the minimum reasonable and appropriate action to take under the prevailing circumstances in the paging industry. We propose in FY 2010 to continue maintaining the regulatory fee rate at $0.08 per subscriber due to the declining subscriber base in this industry.12 We seek comment on this proposal. E. Administrative and Operational Issues 10. In FY 2009, the Commission implemented several changes in procedures which simplified the payment and reconciliation processes of FY 2009 regulatory fees. These changes proved to be very helpful to both licensees and to the Commission, and we propose in the following paragraphs to expand upon these improvements. In FY 2010, the Commission will promote greater use of technology (and less use of paper) to improve the regulatory fee notification and collection process. We seek general comment on ways to promote greater use of technology in collecting regulatory fees. 1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer 11. In FY 2009, we instituted a mandatory filing requirement using the Commission’s electronic filing and payment system (also known as ‘‘Fee Filer’’).13 Licensees filing their annual regulatory fee payments were required to begin the process by entering the Commission’s Fee Filer system with a valid FRN and password. This change was beneficial to both licensees and to the Commission. For example, for licensees, the mandatory use of Fee Filer eliminated the need to manually complete and submit a hardcopy Form 159, and for the Commission, the data in electronic format made it much easier to process payments more efficiently and effectively. Because of the success of this process change, we propose to continue to make the use of Fee Filer for filing annual regulatory fees mandatory. We seek comment on this proposal. As 11 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1997, MD Docket No. 96–186, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17161, 17184–85, para. 60 (1997) (‘‘FY 1997 Report and Order’’). 12 Between FY 1997 and FY 2009, the subscriber base in the paging industry declined 84 percent from 40.8 million to 6.5 million subscribers, according to FY 2009 collections data as of September 30, 2009. 13 FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 20 and 21. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules in FY 2009, the mandatory use of Fee Filer does not mean that licensees are expected to pay only through Fee Filer—it is only mandatory for licensees to begin the process of filing their annual regulatory fees using Fee Filer. This is one reason it is very important for licensees to have a current and valid FRN address on file in the Commission’s Registration System (CORES). Going forward, only Form 159–E documents generated from Fee Filer will be permitted when sending in a regulatory fee payment to U.S. Bank. These Form 159–E’s not only will reduce errors resulting from illegible handwriting on hardcopy Form 159’s, but, because they are generated from Fee Filer, these forms also will create an electronic record of licensee payment attributes that are more easily tracked and searched than hardcopy Form 159’s that are completed manually and mailed to the Commission. 2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS a. Pre-bills 12. In prior years, the Commission mailed pre-bills via surface mail to licensees in select regulatory fee categories: Interstate telecommunications service providers (‘‘ITSPs’’), Geostationary (‘‘GSO’’) and Non-Geostationary (‘‘NGSO’’) satellite space station licensees,14 holders of Cable Television Relay Service (‘‘CARS’’) licenses, and Earth Station licensees.15 The remaining regulatees did not receive pre-bills. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, the Commission decided to have the attributes of these pre-bills viewed in Fee Filer, rather than mailing pre-bills out to licensees via surface mail.16 Although the overall response to 14 Geostationary orbit space station (‘‘GSO’’) licensees received regulatory fee pre-bills for satellites that (1) were licensed by the Commission and operational on or before October 1 of the respective fiscal year; and (2) were not co-located with and technically identical to another operational satellite on that date (i.e., were not functioning as a spare satellite). Non-geostationary orbit space station (‘‘NGSO’’) licensees received regulatory fee pre-bills for systems that were licensed by the Commission and operational on or before October 1 of the respective fiscal year. 15 An assessment is a proposed statement of the amount of regulatory fees owed by an entity to the Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be ascribed for purposes of setting the entity’s regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the Commission’s accounting system as a current debt. A pre-bill is considered an account receivable in the Commission’s accounting system. Pre-bills reflect the amount owed and have a payment due date of the last day of the regulatory fee payment window. Consequently, if a pre-bill is not paid by the due date, it becomes delinquent and is subject to our debt collection procedures. See also 47 CFR 1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910. 16 See FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 24, 26. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 this procedural change was positive, it was apparent that a greater effort should have been made to inform licensees that they would not be receiving a hardcopy regulatory fee bill in the mail. In FY 2010, the Commission will continue to reduce its use of hardcopy documents by not mailing out annual regulatory fee bills, but the Commission is seeking to increase its efforts in notifying licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be mailed out. We seek comment on how to most efficiently and effectively notify licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be mailed out, but that, instead, the amount and attributes of the bills will be available in Fee Filer for review. II. Procedural Matters 13. Included below are procedural items as well as our current payment and collection methods, which we have revised over the past several years to expedite the processing of regulatory fee payments. We include these payments and collection procedures here as a useful way of reminding regulatory fee payers and the public about these aspects of the annual regulatory fee collection process. A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets 14. Each year we post public notices and fact sheets pertaining to regulatory fees on our Web site. These documents contain information about the payment due date and the regulatory fee payment procedures. We will continue to post this information on https://www.fcc.gov/ fees/regfees.html, but as in previous years we will not send out public notices and fact sheets to regulatees en masse. B. Assessment Notifications 1. Media Services Licensees 15. Beginning in FY 2003, we sent fee assessment notifications via surface mail to media services entities on a perfacility basis.17 The notifications provided the assessed fee amount for the facility in question, as well as the data attributes that determined the fee amount. We have since refined this initiative with improved results.18 17 As stated previously at footnote 41, an assessment is a proposed statement of the amount of regulatory fees owed by an entity to the Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be ascribed for purposes of setting the entity’s regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the Commission’s accounting system as a current debt. 18 Some of those refinements have been to provide licensees with a Commission-authorized Web site to update or correct any information concerning their facilities, and to amend their feeexempt status, if need be. Also, our notifications now provide licensees with a telephone number to call in the event that they need customer assistance. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21539 Consistent with procedures used last year, we will mail out media assessment notifications to licensees in FY 2010 at their primary record of contact populated in our Consolidated Database System (‘‘CDBS’’), and to a secondary record of contact, if available.19 However, after FY 2010, as part of the Commission’s initiative to emphasize electronic filing and reduce paper usage, the Commission will stop mailing out media notification assessments to media licensees. Instead the Commission will rely more on its various Web sites, including the Commission-authorized Web site at https://www.fccfees.com, to notify licensees of pending annual regulatory fees and to update or correct any information regarding their facilities and their fee-exempt status.20 We seek comment on our proposal to discontinue sending out media notification letters after the FY 2010 regulatory fee season. 16. The decision to discontinue mailing media notifications beginning in FY 2011 is consistent with the Commission’s effort to become more electronic and less paper-oriented. However, the Commission understands that not all media licensees are able to access the Commission’s various electronic Web sites once the hardcopy notification letters are discontinued in FY 2011. Therefore, to be receptive to the needs of these licensees, the Commission will leave the comment and reply comment period open until September 30, 2010 on the specific issue of whether the media notification letters should be discontinued in FY 2011. Because this decision does not impact FY 2010 regulatory fees, we will be addressing this issue in the Commission’s FY 2011 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking after we have had the chance to review the various The notifications themselves have been refined so that licensees of fewer than four facilities receive individual fee assessment postcards for their facilities; whereas licensees of four or more facilities now receive a single assessment letter that lists all of their facilities and the associated regulatory fee obligation for each facility. 19 We will issue fee assessments for AM and FM Radio Stations, AM and FM Construction Permits, FM Translators/Boosters, VHF and UHF Television Stations, VHF and UHF Television Construction Permits, Satellite Television Stations, Low Power Television (‘‘LPTV’’) Stations and LPTV Translators/ Boosters, to the extent that applicants, permittees and licensees of such facilities do not qualify as government entities or non-profit entities. As in prior years, fee assessments will not be issued for broadcast auxiliary stations. 20 If there is a change of address for the facility, it is the licensee’s responsibility to make the address change in the Media Bureau’s CDBS system, as well as in the Commission’s Registration System (‘‘CORES’’). There is also a Commissionauthorized Web site that media services licensees can use to view and update their exempt status (https://www.fccfees.com). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21540 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules comments and reply comments that have been submitted. In addition to raising this issue in this document, the Commission will also remind media licensees of this proposed change in notification procedures when it sends out letters to media licensees later in the fiscal year regarding their FY 2010 regulatory fee obligations. To ensure that the comments of all potentially affected persons are properly included in the record, media licensees should submit their comments and reply comments on this issue as follows: • Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https:// fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. • Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. • Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. • Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 17. Although the Commission will mail media assessment notifications to licensees in FY 2010, all licensees (including media services) will be required to use Fee Filer as the first step in paying their regulatory fee obligations. The notification assessments provide licensees with the same media data attributes found on Fee Filer; however, receiving this information in FY 2010 via mail notification does not obviate, nor should it be considered a substitute for, using Fee Filer as the first step in filing and paying annual regulatory fees. As explained previously, licensees must first log onto the Commission’s Fee Filer system to begin the process of filing and paying their regulatory fees, but once in Fee Filer, licensees may pay by check or money order, credit card, or wire transfer. A Form 159–E generated from VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 Fee Filer is required, even when mailing in the annual regulatory fee payment. 2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments 18. As we have done in prior years, we will mail an initial assessment letter to Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers using data from the Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast (‘‘NRUF’’) report that is based on ‘‘assigned’’ number counts that have been adjusted for porting to net Type 0 ports (‘‘in’’ and ‘‘out’’).21 The letter will include a listing of the carrier’s Operating Company Numbers (‘‘OCNs’’) upon which the assessment is based.22 The letters will not include OCNs with their respective assigned number counts, but rather, an aggregate total of assigned numbers for each carrier. 19. If the carrier does not agree with the number of subscribers listed on the initial assessment letter, providers will have an opportunity within a specific timeframe to revise their subscriber counts by submitting supporting documentation to substantiate the change. However, instead of mailing the revised figures, providers will be asked to access Fee Filer and follow the instructions provided in order to submit their revised subscriber count along with any supporting documentation.23 The Commission will then review the revised count and supporting documentation and either approve or disapprove the submission in Fee Filer. The provider will be able to review the decision online in Fee Filer. If the submission is disapproved, the Commission will also attempt to contact the provider so that the provider will have an opportunity to discuss its revised subscriber count and/or provide additional supporting documentation. If we receive no response or correction to the initial assessment letter, or we do not reverse the disapproval of the provider’s revised count submission, we will expect the fee payment to be based on the number of subscribers listed on the initial assessment. Once the timeframe for revision has passed, the subscriber counts will be finalized. These subscriber counts will then be the basis upon which CMRS regulatory fees will be expected. Providers will be able 21 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2005 and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2004, MD Docket Nos. 05–59 and 04–73, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 12259, 12264, paragraphs 38–44 (2005). 22 Id. 23 In the supporting documentation, the provider will need to state a reason for the change, such as a purchase or sale of a subsidiary, the date of the transaction, and any other pertinent information that will help to justify a reason for the change. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 to view their final subscriber counts online in Fee Filer. A final CMRS assessment letter will not be mailed out. 20. Because some carriers do not file the NRUF report, they may not receive an initial letter of assessment. In these instances, the carriers should compute their fee payment using the standard methodology 24 that is currently in place for CMRS Wireless services (e.g., compute their subscriber counts as of December 31, 2009), and submit their fee payment accordingly. Whether a carrier receives an assessment letter or not, the Commission reserves the right to audit the number of subscribers for which regulatory fees are paid. In the event that the Commission determines that the number of subscribers paid is inaccurate, the Commission will bill the carrier for the difference between what was paid and what should have been paid. C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process 1. Cable Television Subscribers 21. We will continue to permit cable television operators to base their regulatory fee payment on their company’s aggregate year-end subscriber count, rather than requiring them to sub-report subscriber counts on a per community unit identifier (‘‘CUID’’) basis. 2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers 22. In FY 2006, we streamlined the CMRS payment process by eliminating the requirement for CMRS providers to identify their individual call signs when making their regulatory fee payment, instead allowing CMRS providers to pay their regulatory fees only at the aggregate subscriber level without having to identify their various call signs.25 We will continue this practice in FY 2010. In FY 2007, we consolidated the CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories into one fee category with a single fee code, thereby eliminating the requirement for CMRS providers to separate their subscriber counts into CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories during the regulatory fee payment process. This consolidation of fee categories enabled the Commission to process payments more quickly and accurately. For FY 2010, we will continue this practice of combining the CMRS cellular and 24 See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees Fact Sheet: What You Owe—Commercial Wireless Services for FY 2009 at 1 (rel. September 2009). 25 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2006, MD Docket No. 06–68, Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 8092, 8105, para. 48 (2006). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules CMRS mobile fee categories into one regulatory fee category. due, is less than $10 are exempted from payment of FY 2010 regulatory fees. 3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (‘‘ITSP’’) 4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates 27. The Commission will accept fee payments made in advance of the window for the payment of regulatory fees. The responsibility for payment of fees by service category is as follows: • Media Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for initial construction permits (including construction permits for digital television stations) that were granted on or before October 1, 2009 for AM/FM radio stations, analog VHF/UHF full service television stations, and satellite television stations. Regulatory fees must be paid for all broadcast facility licenses granted on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. • Wireline (Common Carrier) Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. We note that audio bridging service providers are included in this category.26 • Wireless Services: CMRS cellular, mobile, and messaging services (fees based on number of subscribers or telephone number count): Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1, 2009. The number of subscribers, units, or telephone numbers on December 31, 2009 will be used as the basis from which to calculate the fee payment. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. • The first eleven regulatory fee categories in our Schedule of Regulatory Fees (see Appendix B) pay ‘‘small multiyear wireless regulatory fees.’’ Entities pay these regulatory fees in advance for 23. In FY 2007, we adopted a proposal to round lines 14 (total subject revenues) and 16 (total regulatory fee owed) on FCC Form 159–W to the nearest dollar. This revision enabled the Commission to process the ITSP regulatory fee payments more quickly because rounding was performed in a consistent manner and eliminated processing issues that occurred in prior years. In FY 2010, we will continue rounding lines 14 and 16 when calculating the FY 2010 ITSP fee obligation. In addition, as in FY 2009, we will continue the practice of not mailing out Form 159–W via surface mail. D. Payment of Regulatory Fees 1. Lock Box Bank 24. All lock box payments to the Commission for FY 2010 will be processed by U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri, and payable to the FCC. During the regulatory fee season, for those licensees paying by check, money order, or by credit card using Form 159– E remittance advice, the fee payment and Form 159–E remittance advice should be mailed to the following address: Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees, P.O. Box 979084, St. Louis, MO 63197–9000. Additional payment options and instructions are posted at https:// www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments 25. The receiving bank for all wire payments is the Federal Reserve Bank, New York, New York (TREAS NYC). When making a wire transfer, regulatees must fax a copy of their Fee Filer generated Form 159–E to U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri at (314) 418–4232 at least one hour before initiating the wire transfer (but on the same business day), so as to not delay crediting their account. Regulatees should discuss arrangements (including bank closing schedules) with their bankers several days before they plan to make the wire transfer to allow sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed before the deadline. Complete instructions for making wire payments are posted at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/ wiretran.html. 3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees 26. Regulatees whose total FY 2010 regulatory fee liability, including all categories of fees for which payment is VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 26 Audio bridging services are toll teleconferencing services, and audio bridging service providers are required to contribute directly to the universal service fund based on revenues from these services. On June 30, 2008, the Commission released the InterCall Order, in which the Commission stated that InterCall, Inc. and all similarly situated audio bridging service providers are required to contribute directly to the universal service fund. See Request for Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96–45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10731 (2008) (‘‘InterCall Order’’). PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21541 the entire amount of their five-year or ten-year term of initial license, and only pay regulatory fees again when the license is renewed or a new license is obtained. We include these fee categories in our Schedule of Regulatory Fees to publicize our estimates of the number of ‘‘small multi-year wireless’’ licenses that will be renewed or newly obtained in FY 2010. • Multichannel Video Programming Distributor Services (cable television operators and CARS licensees): Regulatory fees must be paid for the number of basic cable television subscribers as of December 31, 2009.27 Regulatory fees also must be paid for CARS licenses that were granted on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. • International Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for earth stations, geostationary orbit space stations and non-geostationary orbit satellite systems that were licensed and operational on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. • International Services: Submarine Cable Systems: Regulatory fees for submarine cable systems are to be paid on a per cable landing license basis based on circuit capacity as of December 31, 2009. In instances where a license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the license as of the fee due date. • International Services: Terestrial and Satellite Services: Finally, regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers that have active (used or leased) international bearer circuits as of December 31, 2009 in any terrestrial or satellite transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier, which includes active circuits to themselves or to their affiliates. In addition, noncommon carrier satellite operators must 27 Cable television system operators should compute their basic subscribers as follows: Number of single family dwellings + number of individual households in multiple dwelling unit (apartments, condominiums, mobile home parks, etc.) paying at the basic subscriber rate + bulk rate customers + courtesy and free service. Note: Bulk-Rate Customers = Total annual bulk-rate charge divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Operators may base their count on ‘‘a typical day in the last full week’’ of December 2009, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2009. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21542 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules pay a fee for each circuit sold or leased to any customer, including themselves or their affiliates, other than an international common carrier authorized by the Commission to provide U.S. international common carrier services. ‘‘Active circuits’’ for these purposes include backup and redundant circuits as of December 31, 2009. Whether circuits are used specifically for voice or data is not relevant for these purposes in determining that they are active circuits. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. E. Enforcement 28. To be considered timely, regulatory fee payments must be received and stamped at the lockbox bank by the last day of the regulatory fee filing window. Section 9(c) of the Act requires us to impose an additional charge as a penalty for late payment of any regulatory fee.28 A late payment penalty of 25 percent of the unpaid amount of the required regulatory fee will be assessed on the first day following the deadline date for filing of these fees. Failure to pay regulatory fees and/or any late penalty will subject regulatees to sanctions, including those set forth in section 1.1910 of the Commission’s rules 29 and in the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (‘‘DCIA’’).30 We also assess administrative processing charges on delinquent debts to recover additional costs incurred in processing and handling the related debt pursuant to the DCIA and section 1.1940(d) of the Commission’s rules.31 These administrative processing charges will be assessed on any delinquent regulatory fee, in addition to the 25 percent late charge penalty. In case of partial payments (underpayments) of regulatory fees, the licensee will be given credit for the amount paid, but if it is later determined that the fee paid is incorrect or not timely paid, then the 25 percent late charge penalty (and other charges and/or sanctions, as appropriate) will be assessed on the WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 28 47 U.S.C. 159(c). 47 CFR 1.1910. 30 Delinquent debt owed to the Commission triggers application of the ‘‘red light rule’’ which requires offsets or holds on pending disbursements. 47 CFR 1.1910. In 2004, the Commission adopted rules implementing the requirements of the DCIA. See Amendment of Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission’s Rules, MD Docket No. 02–339, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6540 (2004); 47 CFR part 1, subpart O, Collection of Claims Owed the United States. 31 47 CFR 1.1940(d). 29 See VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 portion that is not paid in a timely manner. 29. We will withhold action on any applications or other requests for benefits filed by anyone who is delinquent in any non-tax debts owed to the Commission (including regulatory fees) and will ultimately dismiss those applications or other requests if payment of the delinquent debt or other satisfactory arrangement for payment is not made.32 Failure to pay regulatory fees can also result in the initiation of a proceeding to revoke any and all authorizations held by the entity responsible for paying the delinquent fee(s). F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 30. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) is contained in Appendix E. Comments to the IRFA must be identified as responses to the IRFA and filed by the deadlines for comments on the Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Notice, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 31. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’), Public Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506 (c) (4). Completion of the 159 family of forms required by the Commission’s regulatory fee payment process is already approved by the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060–0589 and 3060–0949. H. Congressional Review Act Analysis 32. The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.33 I. Ex Parte Rules 33. This is as a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the 32 See 47 CFR 1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Congressional Review Act is contained in Title II, 251, of the CWAAA; see Public Law 104–121, Title II, 251, 110 Stat. 868. Commission’s rules.34 Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or twosentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.35 Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). J. Filing Requirements 34. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 35. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https:// fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. 36. Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. • Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. • Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be 33 See PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 34 See 47 CFR 1.1206(b); see also 47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1203. 35 See 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. People With Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 418–0432 (tty). 37. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex parte submissions will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY– A257, Washington, DC 20554. These documents will also be available free VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 online, via ECFS. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. 38. Accessibility Information. To request information in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document can also be downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (‘‘PDF’’) at: https:// www.fcc.gov. III. Ordering Clauses 39. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21543 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is hereby adopted. 40. It is further ordered that the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in Appendix E, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. BILLING CODE 6712–01–P E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 VerDate Nov<24>2008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.000</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21544 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21545 EP26AP10.001</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules VerDate Nov<24>2008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.002</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21546 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21547 EP26AP10.003</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules VerDate Nov<24>2008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.004</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21548 21549 BILLING CODE 6712–01–C VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.005</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 21550 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules Appendix C Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010 In order to calculate individual service fees for FY 2010, we adjusted FY 2009 payment units for each service to more accurately reflect expected FY 2010 payment liabilities. We obtained our updated estimates through a variety of means. For example, we used Commission licensee data bases, actual prior year payment records and industry and trade association projections when available. The databases we consulted include our Universal Licensing System (‘‘ULS’’), International Bureau Filing System (‘‘IBFS’’), Consolidated Database System (‘‘CDBS’’) and Cable Operations and Licensing System (‘‘COALS’’), as well as reports generated within the Commission such as the Wireline Competition Bureau’s Trends in Telephone Service and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau’s Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast. We sought verification for these estimates from multiple sources and, in all cases we compared FY 2010 estimates with actual FY 2009 payment units to ensure that our revised estimates were reasonable. Where appropriate, we adjusted and/or rounded our final estimates to take into consideration the fact that certain variables that impact on the number of payment units cannot yet be estimated with sufficient accuracy. These include an unknown number of waivers and/ or exemptions that may occur in FY 2010 and the fact that, in many services, the number of actual licensees or station operators fluctuates from time to time due to economic, technical, or other reasons. When we note, for example, that our estimated FY 2010 payment units are based on FY 2009 actual payment units, it does not necessarily mean that our FY 2010 projection is exactly the same number as FY 2009. We have either rounded the FY 2010 number or adjusted it slightly to account for these variables. Fee category Sources of payment unit estimates Land Mobile (All), Microwave, 218–219 MHz, Marine (Ship & Coast), Aviation (Aircraft & Ground), GMRS, Amateur Vanity Call Signs, Domestic Public Fixed. CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services ......................... CMRS Messaging Services ................................ AM/FM Radio Stations ........................................ UHF/VHF Television Stations ............................. AM/FM/TV Construction Permits ........................ LPTV, Translators and Boosters, Class A Television. Broadcast Auxiliaries .......................................... BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS) ............................... LMDS .................................................................. Cable Television Relay Service (‘‘CARS’’) Stations. Cable Television System Subscribers ................ Based on Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (‘‘WTB’’) projections of new applications and renewals taking into consideration existing Commission licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft) and Marine (Ship) estimates have been adjusted to take into consideration the licensing of portions of these services on a voluntary basis. Based on WTB projection reports, and FY 09 payment data. Based on WTB reports, and FY 09 payment data. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment units. Interstate Telecommunication Service Providers Earth Stations ..................................................... Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs) ..................... International Bearer Circuits ............................... Submarine Cable Licenses ................................. Appendix D WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go Into Determining Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages AM Stations For stations with nondirectional daytime antennas, the theoretical radiation was used at all azimuths. For stations with directional daytime antennas, specific information on each day tower, including field ratio, phasing, spacing and orientation was retrieved, as well as the theoretical pattern root-mean-square of the radiation in all directions in the horizontal plane (‘‘RMS’’) figure milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @ 1 km) for the antenna system. The standard, or modified standard if pertinent, horizontal plane radiation pattern was calculated using techniques and methods specified in 73.150 and 73.152 of the Commission’s rules.1 Radiation values were calculated for each of 360 radials around the transmitter site. Next, estimated soil conductivity data was retrieved from a database representing the 1 47 CFR 73.150 and 73.152. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 Based Based Based Based on on on on actual FY 2009 payment units. WTB reports and actual FY 2009 payment units. WTB reports and actual FY 2009 payment units. data from Media Bureau’s COALS data base and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on publicly available data sources for estimated subscriber counts and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on FCC Form 499–Q data for the four quarters of calendar year 2009, the Wireline Competition Bureau projected the amount of calendar year 2009 revenue that will be reported on 2010 FCC Form 499–A worksheets in April 2010. Based on International Bureau (‘‘IB’’) licensing data and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on IB data reports and actual FY 2009 payment units. Based on IB reports and submissions by licensees. Based on IB license information. information in FCC Figure R3.2 Using the calculated horizontal radiation values, and the retrieved soil conductivity data, the distance to the principal community (5 mV/ m) contour was predicted for each of the 360 radials. The resulting distance to principal community contours were used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which 2,000 block centroids were contained in the polygon. (A block centroid is the center point of a small area containing population as computed by the U.S. Census Bureau.) The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total population for the predicted principal community coverage area. FM Stations The greater of the horizontal or vertical effective radiated power (‘‘ERP’’) (kW) and respective height above average terrain (‘‘HAAT’’) (m) combination was used. Where the antenna height above mean sea level (‘‘HAMSL’’) was available, it was used in lieu of the average HAAT figure to calculate 2 See Map of Estimated Effective Ground Conductivity in the United States, 47 CFR 73.190 Figure R3. PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 specific HAAT figures for each of 360 radials under study. Any available directional pattern information was applied as well, to produce a radial-specific ERP figure. The HAAT and ERP figures were used in conjunction with the Field Strength (50–50) propagation curves specified in 47 CFR 73.313 of the Commission’s rules to predict the distance to the principal community (70 dBu (decibel above 1 microVolt per meter) or 3.17 mV/m) contour for each of the 360 radials.3 The resulting distance to principal community contours were used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which 2,000 block centroids were contained in the polygon. The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total population for the predicted principal community coverage area. 3 47 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM CFR 73.313. 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules Appendix E Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’),36 the Commission prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Notice, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.37 In addition, the Notice and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the Federal Register.38 I. Need for, and Objectives of, the Notice 2. This rulemaking proceeding is initiated for the Commission to obtain comments regarding its proposed amendment to its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in the amount of $335,794,000, which is the amount that Congress has required the Commission to recover. The Commission seeks to collect the necessary amount through its revised Schedule of Regulatory Fees in the most efficient manner possible and without undue public burden. II. Legal Basis 3. This action, including publication of proposed rules, is authorized under sections (4)(i) and (j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.39 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS III. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Rules Will Apply 4. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be affected by the proposed rules and policies, if adopted.40 The RFA generally defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’ 41 In addition, the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning as the term ‘‘small business concern’’ under the Small Business Act.42 A ‘‘small business 36 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601–612 has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law 104–121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (‘‘CWAAA’’). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (‘‘SBREFA’’). 37 5 U.S.C. 603(a). 38 Id. 39 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 159, and 303(r). 40 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3). 41 5 U.S.C. 601(6). 42 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ‘‘small-business concern’’ in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies ‘‘unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.’’ VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 concern’’ is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA.43 5. Small Businesses. Nationwide, there are a total of approximately 29.6 million small businesses, according to the SBA.44 6. Small Organizations. Nationwide, as of 2002, there are approximately 1.6 million small organizations.45 A ‘‘small organization’’ is generally ‘‘any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.’’ 46 7. Small Governmental Jurisdictions. The term ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ is defined generally as ‘‘governments of cities, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand.’’ 47 Census Bureau data for 2002 indicate that there were 87,525 local governmental jurisdictions in the United States.48 We estimate that, of this total, 84,377 entities were ‘‘small governmental jurisdictions.’’ 49 Thus, we estimate that most governmental jurisdictions are small. 8. We have included small incumbent local exchange carriers in this present RFA analysis. As noted above, a ‘‘small business’’ under the RFA is one that, inter alia, meets the pertinent small business size standard (e.g., a telephone communications business having 1,500 or fewer employees), and ‘‘is not dominant in its field of operation.’’ 50 The SBA’s Office of Advocacy contends that, for RFA purposes, small incumbent local exchange carriers are not dominant in their field of operation because any such dominance is not ‘‘national’’ in scope.51 We have therefore included small incumbent local exchange carriers in this RFA analysis, although we emphasize that this RFA action has no effect on Commission analyses and determinations in other, non-RFA contexts. 9. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (‘‘ILECs’’). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for incumbent local exchange services. The appropriate size 43 15 U.S.C. 632. SBA, Office of Advocacy, ‘‘Frequently Asked Questions,’’ https://web.sba.gov/faqs (accessed Jan. 2009). 45 Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit Almanac & Desk Reference (2002). 46 5 U.S.C. 601(4). 47 5 U.S.C. 601(5). 48 U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2006, section 8, p. 272, Table 415. 49 We assume that the villages, school districts, and special districts are small, and total 48,558. See U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2006, section 8, p. 273, Table 417. For 2002, Census Bureau data indicate that the total number of county, municipal, and township governments nationwide was 38,967, of which 35,819 were small. Id. 50 15 U.S.C. 632. 51 Letter from Jere W. Glover, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, SBA, to William E. Kennard, Chairman, FCC (May 27, 1999). The Small Business Act contains a definition of ‘‘small-business concern,’’ which the RFA incorporates into its own definition of ‘‘small business.’’ See 15 U.S.C. 632(a) (‘‘Small Business Act’’); 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (‘‘RFA’’). SBA regulations interpret ‘‘small business concern’’ to include the concept of dominance on a national basis. See 13 CFR 121.102(b). 44 See PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21551 standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.52 According to Commission data,53 1,311 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of incumbent local exchange services. Of these 1,311 carriers, an estimated 1,024 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 287 have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that most providers of incumbent local exchange service are small businesses that may be affected by our proposed action. 10. Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (‘‘CLECs’’), Competitive Access Providers (‘‘CAPs’’), ‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’ and ‘‘Other Local Service Providers.’’ Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for these service providers. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.54 According to Commission data,55 1005 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of either competitive access provider services or competitive local exchange carrier services. Of these 1005 carriers, an estimated 918 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 87 have more than 1,500 employees. In addition, 16 carriers have reported that they are ‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’ and all 16 are estimated to have 1,500 or fewer employees. In addition, 89 carriers have reported that they are ‘‘Other Local Service Providers.’’ Of the 89, all have 1,500 or fewer employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that most providers of competitive local exchange service, competitive access providers, ‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’ and ‘‘Other Local Service Providers’’ are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 11. Local Resellers. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for the category of Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.56 According to Commission data,57 151 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of local resale services. Of these, an estimated 149 have 1,500 or fewer employees and two have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of local resellers are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 12. Toll Resellers. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for the category of Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is 52 13 CFR 121.201, North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 517110. 53 FCC, Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3, Page 5–5 (Aug. 2008) (‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’). This source uses data that are current as of November 1, 2006. 54 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 55 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 56 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310. 57 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21552 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.58 According to Commission data,59 815 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of toll resale services. Of these, an estimated 787 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 28 have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of toll resellers are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 13. Payphone Service Providers (‘‘PSPs’’). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for payphone services providers. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.60 According to Commission data,61 526 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of payphone services. Of these, an estimated 524 have 1,500 or fewer employees and two have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of payphone service providers are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 14. Interexchange Carriers (‘‘IXCs’’). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for providers of interexchange services. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.62 According to Commission data,63 300 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of interexchange service. Of these, an estimated 268 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 32 have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of IXCs are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 15. Operator Service Providers (‘‘OSPs’’). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for operator service providers. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.64 According to Commission data,65 28 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of operator services. Of these, an estimated 27 have 1,500 or fewer employees and one has more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of OSPs are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 16. Prepaid Calling Card Providers. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for prepaid calling card providers. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is 58 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310. in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 60 3 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 61 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 62 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 63 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 64 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 65 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 59 ‘‘Trends VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 for the category Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.66 According to Commission data,67 88 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of prepaid calling cards. Of these, an estimated 85 have 1,500 or fewer employees and three have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of prepaid calling card providers are small entities that may be affected by our proposed action. 17. 800 and 800–Like Service Subscribers.68 Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for 800 and 800-like service (‘‘toll free’’) subscribers. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.69 The most reliable source of information regarding the number of these service subscribers appears to be data the Commission receives from Database Service Management on the 800, 866, 877, and 888 numbers in use.70 According to our data, at the end of December 2007, the number of 800 numbers assigned was 7,860,000; the number of 888 numbers assigned was 5,210,184; the number of 877 numbers assigned was 4,388,682; and the number of 866 numbers assigned was 7,029,116. We do not have data specifying the number of these subscribers that are independently owned and operated or have 1,500 or fewer employees, and thus are unable at this time to estimate with greater precision the number of toll free subscribers that would qualify as small businesses under the SBA size standard. Consequently, we estimate that there are 7,860,000 or fewer small entity 800 subscribers; 5,210,184 or fewer small entity 888 subscribers; 4,388,682 or fewer small entity 877 subscribers, and 7,029,116 or fewer entity 866 subscribers. 18. Satellite Telecommunications and All Other Telecommunications. These two economic census categories address the satellite industry. The first category has a small business size standard of $15 million or less in average annual receipts, under SBA rules.71 The second has a size standard of $25 million or less in annual receipts.72 The most current Census Bureau data in this context, however, are from the (last) economic census of 2002, and we will use those figures to gauge the prevalence of small businesses in these categories.73 19. The category of Satellite Telecommunications ‘‘comprises establishments primarily engaged in providing telecommunications services to 66 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310. in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 68 We include all toll-free number subscribers in this category. 69 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517310. 70 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Tables 18.4, 18.5, 18.6, and 18.7. 71 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517410. 72 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517919. 73 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517410 and 517910 (2002). 67 ‘‘Trends PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 other establishments in the telecommunications and broadcasting industries by forwarding and receiving communications signals via a system of satellites or reselling satellite telecommunications.’’ 74 For this category, Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there were a total of 371 firms that operated for the entire year.75 Of this total, 307 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 26 firms had receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.76 Consequently, we estimate that the majority of Satellite Telecommunications firms are small entities that might be affected by our action. 20. The second category of All Other Telecommunications comprises, inter alia, ‘‘establishments primarily engaged in providing specialized telecommunications services, such as satellite tracking, communications telemetry, and radar station operation. This industry also includes establishments primarily engaged in providing satellite terminal stations and associated facilities connected with one or more terrestrial systems and capable of transmitting telecommunications to, and receiving telecommunications from, satellite systems.’’ 77 For this category, Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there were a total of 332 firms that operated for the entire year.78 Of this total, 303 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million and 15 firms had annual receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.79 Consequently, we estimate that the majority of All Other Telecommunications firms are small entities that might be affected by our action. 21. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). Since 2007, the Census Bureau has placed wireless firms within this new, broad, economic census category.80 Prior to that time, such firms were within the now-superseded categories of ‘‘Paging’’ and ‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications.’’ 81 Under the present and prior categories, the SBA has deemed a wireless business to be small if it has 1,500 74 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517410 Satellite Telecommunications’’; https:// www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND517410.HTM. 75 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code 517410 (issued Nov. 2005). 76 Id. An additional 38 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 77 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517919 All Other Telecommunications’’; https:// www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ ND517919.HTM#N517919. 78 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code 517910 (issued Nov. 2005). 79 Id. An additional 14 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 80 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517210 Wireless Telecommunications Categories (Except Satellite)’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/ 2007/def/ND517210.HTM#N517210. 81 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517211 Paging’’; https://www.census.gov/epcd/ naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.; U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517212 Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications’’; https:// www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS or fewer employees.82 Because Census Bureau data are not yet available for the new category, we will estimate small business prevalence using the prior categories and associated data. For the category of Paging, data for 2002 show that there were 807 firms that operated for the entire year.83 Of this total, 804 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and three firms had employment of 1,000 employees or more.84 For the category of Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications, data for 2002 show that there were 1,397 firms that operated for the entire year.85 Of this total, 1,378 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and 19 firms had employment of 1,000 employees or more.86 Thus, we estimate that the majority of wireless firms are small. 22. Common Carrier Paging. As noted, the SBA has developed a small business size standard for Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) firms within the broad economic census categories of ‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications.’’ 87 Since 2007, the Census Bureau has placed wireless firms within this new, broad, economic census category.88 Prior to that time, such firms were within the now-superseded categories of ‘‘Paging’’ and ‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications.’’ 89 Under the present and prior categories, the SBA has deemed a wireless business to be small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.90 Because Census Bureau data are not yet available for the new category, we will estimate small business prevalence using the prior categories and associated data. For the category of Paging, data for 2002 show that there were 807 firms 82 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210 (2007 NAICS). The now-superseded, pre-2007 C.F.R. citations were 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517211 and 517212 (referring to the 2002 NAICS). 83 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’ Table 5, NAICS code 517211 (issued Nov. 2005). 84 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate of the number of firms that have employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000 employees or more.’’ 85 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’ Table 5, NAICS code 517212 (issued Nov. 2005). 86 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate of the number of firms that have employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000 employees or more.’’ 87 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517212. 88 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517210 Wireless Telecommunications Categories (Except Satellite)’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/ 2007/def/ND517210.HTM#N517210. 89 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517211 Paging’’; https://www.census.gov/epcd/ naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM.; U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517212 Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications’’; https:// www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/def/NDEF517.HTM. 90 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210 (2007 NAICS). The now-superseded, pre-2007 CFR citations were 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517211 and 517212 (referring to the 2002 NAICS). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 that operated for the entire year.91 Of this total, 804 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and three firms had employment of 1,000 employees or more.92 For the category of Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications, data for 2002 show that there were 1,397 firms that operated for the entire year.93 Of this total, 1,378 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and 19 firms had employment of 1,000 employees or more.94 Thus, we estimate that the majority of wireless firms are small. 23. In addition, in the Paging Second Report and Order, the Commission adopted a size standard for ‘‘small businesses’’ for purposes of determining their eligibility for special provisions such as bidding credits and installment payments.95 A small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.96 The SBA has approved this definition.97 An initial auction of Metropolitan Economic Area (‘‘MEA’’) licenses was conducted in the year 2000. Of the 2,499 licenses auctioned, 985 were sold.98 Fifty-seven companies claiming small business status won 440 licenses.99 A subsequent auction of MEA and Economic Area (‘‘EA’’) licenses was held in the year 2001. Of the 15,514 licenses auctioned, 5,323 were sold.100 One hundred thirty-two companies claiming small business status purchased 3,724 licenses. A third auction, consisting of 8,874 licenses in each of 175 EAs and 1,328 licenses in all but three of the 51 MEAs, was held in 2003. 91 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’ Table 5, NAICS code 517211 (issued Nov. 2005). 92 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate of the number of firms that have employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000 employees or more.’’ 93 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization,’’ Table 5, NAICS code 517212 (issued Nov. 2005). 94 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate of the number of firms that have employment of 1,500 or fewer employees; the largest category provided is for firms with ‘‘1000 employees or more.’’ 95 Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 2732, 2811–2812, paras. 178– 181 (‘‘Paging Second Report and Order’’); see also Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 10030, 10085–10088, paras. 98–107 (1999). 96 Paging Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 2811, para. 179. 97 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, SBA, to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (‘‘WTB’’), FCC (Dec. 2, 1998) (‘‘Alvarez Letter 1998’’). 98 See ‘‘929 and 931 MHz Paging Auction Closes,’’ Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 4858 (WTB 2000). 99 See id. 100 See ‘‘Lower and Upper Paging Band Auction Closes,’’ Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 21821 (WTB 2002). PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21553 Seventy-seven bidders claiming small or very small business status won 2,093 licenses.101 24. Currently, there are approximately 74,000 Common Carrier Paging licenses. According to the most recent Trends in Telephone Service, 281 carriers reported that they were engaged in the provision of ‘‘paging and messaging’’ services.102 Of these, an estimated 279 have 1,500 or fewer employees and two have more than 1,500 employees.103 We estimate that the majority of common carrier paging providers would qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. 25. 2.3 GHz Wireless Communications Services. This service can be used for fixed, mobile, radiolocation, and digital audio broadcasting satellite uses. The Commission defined ‘‘small business’’ for the wireless communications services (‘‘WCS’’) auction as an entity with average gross revenues of $40 million for each of the three preceding years, and a ‘‘very small business’’ as an entity with average gross revenues of $15 million for each of the three preceding years.104 The SBA has approved these definitions.105 The Commission auctioned geographic area licenses in the WCS service. In the auction, which was conducted in 1997, there were seven bidders that won 31 licenses that qualified as very small business entities, and one bidder that won one license that qualified as a small business entity. 26. 1670–1675 MHz Services. An auction for one license in the 1670–1675 MHz band was conducted in 2003. One license was awarded. The winning bidder was not a small entity. 27. Wireless Telephony. Wireless telephony includes cellular, personal communications services, and specialized mobile radio telephony carriers. As noted, the SBA has developed a small business size standard for Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite).106 Under the SBA small business size standard, a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.107 According to Trends in Telephone Service data, 434 carriers reported that they were engaged in wireless telephony.108 Of these, an estimated 222 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 212 have more than 1,500 employees.109 We have estimated that 222 of these are small under the SBA small business size standard. 28. Broadband Personal Communications Service. The broadband personal 101 See ‘‘Lower and Upper Paging Bands Auction Closes,’’ Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11154 (WTB 2003). The current number of small or very small business entities that hold wireless licenses may differ significantly from the number of such entities that won in spectrum auctions due to assignments and transfers of licenses in the secondary market over time. In addition, some of the same small business entities may have won licenses in more than one auction. 102 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 103 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 104 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Establish Part 27, the Wireless Communications Service (WCS), Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 10785, 10879, para. 194 (1997). 105 See Alvarez Letter 1998. 106 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 107 Id. 108 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. 109 ‘‘Trends in Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21554 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules communications services (‘‘PCS’’) spectrum is divided into six frequency blocks designated A through F, and the Commission has held auctions for each block. The Commission has created a small business size standard for Blocks C and F as an entity that has average gross revenues of less than $40 million in the three previous calendar years.110 For Block F, an additional small business size standard for ‘‘very small business’’ was added and is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more than $15 million for the preceding three calendar years.111 These small business size standards, in the context of broadband PCS auctions, have been approved by the SBA.112 No small businesses within the SBAapproved small business size standards bid successfully for licenses in Blocks A and B. There were 90 winning bidders that qualified as small entities in the Block C auctions. A total of 93 ‘‘small’’ and ‘‘very small’’ business bidders won approximately 40 percent of the 1,479 licenses for Blocks D, E, and F.113 In 1999, the Commission reauctioned 155 C, D, E, and F Block licenses; there were 113 small business winning bidders.114 29. In 2001, the Commission completed the auction of 422 C and F Broadband PCS licenses in Auction 35. Of the 35 winning bidders in this auction, 29 qualified as ‘‘small’’ or ‘‘very small’’ businesses.115 Subsequent events, concerning Auction 35, including judicial and agency determinations, resulted in a total of 163 C and F Block licenses being available for grant. In 2005, the Commission completed an auction of 188 C block licenses and 21 F block licenses in Auction 58. There were 24 winning bidders for 217 licenses.116 Of the 24 winning bidders, 16 claimed small business status and won 156 licenses. In 2007, the Commission completed an auction of 33 licenses in the A, C, and F Blocks in Auction 71.117 Of the 14 winning bidders, six were designated entities.118 In 2008, the Commission completed an auction of 20 Broadband PCS licenses in the C, D, E and F block licenses in Auction 78.119 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 110 See Amendment of Parts 20 and 24 of the Commission’s Rules—Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7824, 7850–7852, paras. 57–60 (1996) (‘‘PCS Report and Order’’); see also 47 CFR 24.720(b). 111 See PCS Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 7852, para. 60. 112 See Alvarez Letter 1998. 113 FCC News, ‘‘Broadband PCS, D, E and F Block Auction Closes,’’ No. 71744 (rel. Jan. 14, 1997). 114 See ‘‘C, D, E, and F Block Broadband PCS Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 6688 (WTB 1999). 115 See ‘‘C and F Block Broadband PCS Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 2339 (2001). 116 See ‘‘Broadband PCS Spectrum Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 58,’’ public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 3703 (2005). 117 See ‘‘Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 71,’’ public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 9247 (2007). 118 Id. 119 See Auction of AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Licenses Rescheduled for August 13, 2008, Notice of Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 30. Advanced Wireless Services. In 2008, the Commission conducted the auction of Advanced Wireless Services (‘‘AWS’’) licenses.120 This auction, which as designated as Auction 78, offered 35 licenses in the AWS 1710–1755 MHz and 2110–2155 MHz bands (‘‘AWS–1’’). The AWS–1 licenses were licenses for which there were no winning bids in Auction 66. That same year, the Commission completed Auction 78. A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceeded $15 million and did not exceed $40 million for the preceding three years (‘‘small business’’) received a 15 percent discount on its winning bid. A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that did not exceed $15 million for the preceding three years (‘‘very small business’’) received a 25 percent discount on its winning bid. A bidder that had combined total assets of less than $500 million and combined gross revenues of less than $125 million in each of the last two years qualified for entrepreneur status.121 Four winning bidders that identified themselves as very small businesses won 17 licenses.122 Three of the winning bidders that identified themselves as a small business won five licenses. Additionally, one other winning bidder that qualified for entrepreneur status won 2 licenses. 31. Narrowband Personal Communications Services. In 1994, the Commission conducted an auction for Narrowband PCS licenses. A second auction was also conducted later in 1994. For purposes of the first two Narrowband PCS auctions, ‘‘small businesses’’ were entities with average gross revenues for the prior three calendar years of $40 million or less.123 Through these auctions, the Commission awarded a total of 41 licenses, 11 of which were obtained by four small businesses.124 To ensure meaningful participation by small business entities in future auctions, the Commission adopted a two-tiered small business size standard in the Narrowband PCS Second Report and Order.125 A ‘‘small business’’ is an Upfront Payments and Other Procedures For Auction 78, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 7496 (2008) (‘‘AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Procedures Public Notice’’). 120 See AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Procedures Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 7496. Auction 78 also included an auction of Broadband PCS licenses. 121 Id. at 23 FCC Rcd at 7521–22. 122 See ‘‘Auction of AWS–1 and Broadband PCS Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 78, Down Payments Due September 9, 2008, FCC Forms 601 and 602 Due September 9, 2008, Final Payments Due September 23, 2008, TenDay Petition to Deny Period’’, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 12749–65 (2008). 123 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act—Competitive Bidding Narrowband PCS, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 175, 196, para. 46 (1994). 124 See ‘‘Announcing the High Bidders in the Auction of ten Nationwide Narrowband PCS Licenses, Winning Bids Total $617,006,674,’’ Public Notice, PNWL 94–004 (rel. Aug. 2, 1994); ‘‘Announcing the High Bidders in the Auction of 30 Regional Narrowband PCS Licenses; Winning Bids Total $490,901,787,’’ public notice, PNWL 94–27 (rel. Nov. 9, 1994). 125 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 entity that, together with affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues for the three preceding years of not more than $40 million.126 A ‘‘very small business’’ is an entity that, together with affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues for the three preceding years of not more than $15 million.127 The SBA has approved these small business size standards.128 A third auction was conducted in 2001. Here, five bidders won 317 (Metropolitan Trading Areas and nationwide) licenses.129 Three of these claimed status as a small or very small entity and won 311 licenses. 32. 700 MHz Band Licenses. The Commission previously adopted criteria for defining three groups of small businesses for purposes of determining their eligibility for special provisions such as bidding credits.130 The Commission defined a ‘‘small business’’ as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues not exceeding $40 million for the preceding three years.131 A ‘‘very small business’’ is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues that are not more than $15 million for the preceding three years.132 Additionally, the lower 700 MHz Service had a third category of small business status for Metropolitan/ Rural Service Area (‘‘MSA/RSA’’) licenses. The third category is ‘‘entrepreneur,’’ which is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues that are not more than $3 million for the preceding three years.133 The SBA approved these small size standards.134 The Commission conducted an auction in 2002 of 740 licenses (one license in each of the 734 MSAs/RSAs and one license in each of the six Economic Area Groupings (EAGs)). Of the 740 licenses available for auction, 484 licenses were sold to 102 winning bidders. Seventy-two of the winning bidders claimed small business, very small business or entrepreneur status and won a total of 329 licenses. 135 The Commission conducted a second auction in 2003 that included 256 licenses: 5 EAG licenses and 476 Cellular Market Area Narrowband PCS, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 10456, 10476, para. 40 (2000) (‘‘Narrowband PCS Second Report and Order’’). 126 Narrowband PCS Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 10476, para. 40. 127 Id. 128 See Alvarez Letter 1998. 129 See ‘‘Narrowband PCS Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 18663 (WTB 2001). 130 See Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698–746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52–59), Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 (2002) (‘‘Channels 52–59 Report and Order’’). 131 See Channels 52–59 Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 1087–88, para. 172. 132 See id. 133 See id., 17 FCC Rcd at 1088, para. 173. 134 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, SBA, to Thomas Sugrue, Chief, WTB, FCC (Aug. 10, 1999) (‘‘Alvarez Letter 1999’’). 135 See ‘‘Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 17272 (WTB 2002). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS licenses.136 Seventeen winning bidders claimed small or very small business status and won 60 licenses, and nine winning bidders claimed entrepreneur status and won 154 licenses.137 In 2005, the Commission completed an auction of 5 licenses in the lower 700 MHz band (Auction 60). There were three winning bidders for five licenses. All three winning bidders claimed small business status. 33. In 2007, the Commission adopted the 700 MHz Second Report and Order.138 The Order revised the band plan for the commercial (including Guard Band) and public safety spectrum, adopted services rules, including stringent build-out requirements, an open platform requirement on the C Block, and a requirement on the D Block licensee to construct and operate a nationwide, interoperable wireless broadband network for public safety users. In 2008, the Commission commenced Auction 73 which offered all available, commercial 700 MHz Band licenses (1,099 licenses) for bidding using the Commission’s standard simultaneous multiple-round (‘‘SMR’’) auction format for the A, B, D, and E block licenses and an SMR auction design with hierarchical package bidding (‘‘HPB’’) for the C Block licenses. Later in 2008, the Commission concluded Auction 73.139 A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that did not exceed $15 million for the preceding three years (very small business) qualified for a 25 percent discount on its winning bids. A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceeded $15 million, but did not exceed $40 million for the preceding three years, qualified for a 15 percent discount on its winning bids. There were 36 winning bidders (who won 330 of the 1,090 licenses won) that identified themselves as very small businesses. There were 20 winning bidders that identified themselves as a small business that won 49 136 See ‘‘Lower 700 MHz Band Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 18 FCC Rcd 11873 (WTB 2003). 137 See id. 138 Service Rules for the 698–746, 747–762 and 777–792 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 06–150, Revision of the Commission’s Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94–102, Section 68.4(a) of the Commission’s rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephone, WT Docket No. 01–309, Biennial Regulatory Review—Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, and 90 to Streamline and Harmonize Various Rules Affecting Wireless Radio Services, WT Docket No. 03–264, Former Nextel Communications, Inc. Upper700 MHz Guard Band Licenses and Revisions to Part 27 of the Commission’s rules, WT Docket No. 06–169, Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band, PS Docket No. 06–229, Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal, State, and Local Public Safety Communications Requirements Through the Year 2010, WT Docket No. 96–86, Second Report and Order, FCC 07–132 (2007) (‘‘700 MHz Second Report and Order’’), 22 FCC Rcd 15289 (2007). 139 Auction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 73, Down Payments Due April 3, 2008, FCC Forms 601 and 602 April 3, 2008, Final Payment Due April 17, 2008, Ten-Day Petition to Deny Period, Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 4572 (2008). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 of the 1,090 licenses won.140 The provisionally winning bids for the A, B, C, and E Block licenses exceeded the aggregate reserve prices for those blocks. However, the provisionally winning bid for the D Block license did not meet the applicable reserve price and thus did not become a winning bid.141 34. 700 MHz Guard Band Licenses. In the 700 MHz Guard Band Order, the Commission adopted size standards for ‘‘small businesses’’ and ‘‘very small businesses’’ for purposes of determining their eligibility for special provisions such as bidding credits and installment payments.142 A small business in this service is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues not exceeding $40 million for the preceding three years.143 Additionally, a very small business is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues that are not more than $15 million for the preceding three years.144 SBA approval of these definitions is not required.145 In 2000, the Commission conducted an auction of 52 Major Economic Area (‘‘MEA’’) licenses.146 Of the 104 licenses auctioned, 96 licenses were sold to nine bidders. Five of these bidders were small businesses that won a total of 26 licenses. A second auction of 700 MHz Guard Band licenses commenced and closed in 2001. All eight of the licenses auctioned were sold to three bidders. One of these bidders was a small business that won a total of two licenses.147 35. Specialized Mobile Radio. The Commission awards ‘‘small entity’’ bidding credits in auctions for Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) geographic area licenses in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands to firms that had revenues of no more than $15 million in each of the three previous calendar years.148 The Commission awards ‘‘very small entity’’ bidding credits to firms that had revenues of no more than $3 million in each of the three previous calendar years.149 The SBA has approved these small business size standards for the 900 MHz Service.150 The Commission has held auctions for geographic area licenses in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. The 900 MHz SMR auction was completed in 1996. 140 Id. 23 FCC Rcd at 4572–73. 141 Id. 142 See Service Rules for the 746–764 MHz Bands, and Revisions to Part 27 of the Commission’s rules, Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5299 (2000) (‘‘746–764 MHz Band Second Report and Order’’). 143 See 746–764 MHz Band Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5343, para. 108. 144 See id. 145 See id., 15 FCC Rcd 5299, 5343, para. 108 n.246 (for the 746–764 MHz and 776–794 MHz bands, the Commission is exempt from 15 U.S.C. 632, which requires Federal agencies to obtain SBA approval before adopting small business size standards). 146 See ‘‘700 MHz Guard Bands Auction Closes: Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 15 FCC Rcd 18026 (2000). 147 See ‘‘700 MHz Guard Bands Auction Closes: Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 4590 (WTB 2001). 148 47 CFR 90.814(b)(1). 149 47 CFR 90.814(b)(1). 150 See Alvarez Letter 1999. PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21555 Sixty bidders claiming that they qualified as small businesses under the $15 million size standard won 263 geographic area licenses in the 900 MHz SMR band. The 800 MHz SMR auction for the upper 200 channels was conducted in 1997. Ten bidders claiming that they qualified as small businesses under the $15 million size standard won 38 geographic area licenses for the upper 200 channels in the 800 MHz SMR band.151 A second auction for the 800 MHz band was conducted in 2002 and included 23 BEA licenses. One bidder claiming small business status won five licenses.152 36. The auction of the 1,053 800 MHz SMR geographic area licenses for the General Category channels was conducted in 2000. Eleven bidders won 108 geographic area licenses for the General Category channels in the 800 MHz SMR band qualified as small businesses under the $15 million size standard.153 In an auction completed in 2000, a total of 2,800 Economic Area licenses in the lower 80 channels of the 800 MHz SMR service were awarded.154 Of the 22 winning bidders, 19 claimed small business status and won 129 licenses. Thus, combining all three auctions, 40 winning bidders for geographic licenses in the 800 MHz SMR band claimed status as small business. 37. In addition, there are numerous incumbent site-by-site SMR licensees and licensees with extended implementation authorizations in the 800 and 900 MHz bands. We do not know how many firms provide 800 MHz or 900 MHz geographic area SMR pursuant to extended implementation authorizations, nor how many of these providers have annual revenues of no more than $15 million. One firm has over $15 million in revenues. In addition, we do not know how many of these firms have 1,500 or fewer employees.155 We assume, for purposes of this analysis, that all of the remaining existing extended implementation authorizations are held by small entities, as that small business size standard is approved by the SBA. 38. 220 MHz Radio Service—Phase I Licensees. The 220 MHz service has both Phase I and Phase II licenses. Phase I licensing was conducted by lotteries in 1992 and 1993. There are approximately 1,515 such non-nationwide licensees and four nationwide licensees currently authorized to operate in the 220 MHz band. The Commission has not developed a definition of small entities specifically applicable to such incumbent 220 MHz Phase I licensees. 151 See ‘‘Correction to Public Notice DA 96–586 ‘FCC Announces Winning Bidders in the Auction of 1020 Licenses to Provide 900 MHz SMR in Major Trading Areas,’ ’’ public notice, 18 FCC Rcd 18367 (WTB 1996). 152 See ‘‘Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (WTB 2002). 153 See ‘‘800 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Service General Category (851–854 MHz) and Upper Band (861–865 MHz) Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 15 FCC Rcd 17162 (2000). 154 See, ‘‘800 MHz SMR Service Lower 80 Channels Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 1736 (2000). 155 See generally 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21556 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules To estimate the number of such licensees that are small businesses, we apply the small business size standard under the SBA rules applicable to Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite).156 This category provides that a small business is a wireless company employing no more than 1,500 persons.157 The Commission estimates that most such licensees are small businesses under the SBA’s small business standard. 39. 220 MHz Radio Service—Phase II Licensees. The 220 MHz service has both Phase I and Phase II licenses. The Phase II 220 MHz service is a new service, and is subject to spectrum auctions. In the 220 MHz Third Report and Order, the Commission adopted a small business size standard for defining ‘‘small’’ and ‘‘very small’’ businesses for purposes of determining their eligibility for special provisions such as bidding credits and installment payments.158 This small business standard indicates that a ‘‘small business’’ is an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.159 A ‘‘very small business’’ is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has average gross revenues that do not exceed $3 million for the preceding three years.160 The SBA has approved these small size standards.161 Auctions of Phase II licenses commenced on and closed in 1998.162 In the first auction, 908 licenses were auctioned in three different-sized geographic areas: three nationwide licenses, 30 Regional Economic Area Group (‘‘EAG’’) Licenses, and 875 Economic Area (EA) Licenses. Of the 908 licenses auctioned, 693 were sold.163 Thirtynine small businesses won 373 licenses in the first 220 MHz auction. A second auction included 225 licenses: 216 EA licenses and 9 EAG licenses. Fourteen companies claiming small business status won 158 licenses.164 A third auction included four licenses: 2 BEA licenses and 2 EAG licenses in the 220 MHz Service. No small or very small business won any of these licenses.165 In 2007, the Commission conducted a fourth auction of the 220 MHz licenses.166 Bidding 156 Id. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 157 Id. 158 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Provide For the Use of the 220–222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 10943, 11068– 70, paras. 291–295 (1997). 159 Id. at 11068, para. 291. 160 Id. 161 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, SBA, to Daniel Phythyon, Chief, WTB, FCC (Jan. 6, 1998) (‘‘Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998’’). 162 See generally ‘‘220 MHz Service Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 605 (1998). 163 See ‘‘FCC Announces It is Prepared to Grant 654 Phase II 220 MHz Licenses After Final Payment is Made,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 1085 (1999). 164 See ‘‘Phase II 220 MHz Service Spectrum Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11218 (1999). 165 See ‘‘Multi-Radio Service Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 17 FCC Rcd 1446 (2002). 166 See ‘‘Auction of Phase II 220 MHz Service Spectrum Scheduled for June 20, 2007, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction 72, public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 3404 (2007). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 credits were offered to small businesses. A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceeded $3 million and did not exceed $15 million for the preceding three years (‘‘small business’’) received a 25 percent discount on its winning bid. A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that did not exceed $3 million for the preceding three years received a 35 percent discount on its winning bid (‘‘very small business’’). Auction 72, which offered 94 Phase II 220 MHz Service licenses, concluded in 2007.167 In this auction, five winning bidders won a total of 76 licenses. Two winning bidders identified themselves as very small businesses won 56 of the 76 licenses. One of the winning bidders that identified themselves as a small business won 5 of the 76 licenses won. 40. Cellular Radiotelephone Service. Auction 77 was held to resolve one group of mutually exclusive applications for Cellular Radiotelephone Service licenses for unserved areas in New Mexico.168 Bidding credits for designated entities were not available in Auction 77.169 In 2008, the Commission completed the closed auction of one unserved service area in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, designated as Auction 77. Auction 77 concluded with one provisionally winning bid for the unserved area totaling $25,002.170 41. Private Land Mobile Radio (‘‘PLMR’’). PLMR systems serve an essential role in a range of industrial, business, land transportation, and public safety activities. These radios are used by companies of all sizes operating in all U.S. business categories, and are often used in support of the licensee’s primary (nontelecommunications) business operations. For the purpose of determining whether a licensee of a PLMR system is a small business as defined by the SBA, we use the broad census category, Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This definition provides that a small entity is any such entity employing no more than 1,500 persons.171 The Commission does not require PLMR licensees to disclose information about number of employees, so the Commission does not have information that could be used to determine how many PLMR licensees constitute small entities under this definition. We note that PLMR licensees generally use the licensed facilities in support of other business activities, and therefore, it would also be helpful to assess 167 See ‘‘Auction of Phase II 220 MHz Service Spectrum Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 72, Down Payments due July 18, 2007, FCC Forms 601 and 602 due July 18, 2007, Final Payments due August 1, 2007, Ten-Day Petition to Deny Period, public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 11573 (2007). 168 See Closed Auction of Licenses for Cellular Unserved Service Area Scheduled for June 17, 2008, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for Auction 77, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 6670 (2008). 169 Id. at 6685. 170 See Auction of Cellular Unserved Service Area License Closes, Winning Bidder Announced for Auction 77, Down Payment due July 2, 2008, Final Payment due July 17, 2008, public notice, 23 FCC Rcd 9501 (2008). 171 See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 PLMR licensees under the standards applied to the particular industry subsector to which the licensee belongs.172 42. As of March 2010, there were 424,162 PLMR licensees operating 921,909 transmitters in the PLMR bands below 512 MHz. We note that any entity engaged in a commercial activity is eligible to hold a PLMR license, and that any revised rules in this context could therefore potentially impact small entities covering a great variety of industries. 43. Fixed Microwave Services. Fixed microwave services include common carrier,173 private operational-fixed,174 and broadcast auxiliary radio services.175 At present, there are approximately 22,015 common carrier fixed licensees and 61,670 private operational-fixed licensees and broadcast auxiliary radio licensees in the microwave services. The Commission has not created a size standard for a small business specifically with respect to fixed microwave services. For purposes of this analysis, the Commission uses the SBA small business size standard for the category Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite), which is 1,500 or fewer employees.176 The Commission does not have data specifying the number of these licensees that have no more than 1,500 employees, and thus are unable at this time to estimate with greater precision the number of fixed microwave service licensees that would qualify as small business concerns under the SBA’s small business size standard. Consequently, the Commission estimates that there are 22,015 or fewer common carrier fixed licensees and 61,670 or fewer private operational-fixed licensees and broadcast auxiliary radio licensees in the microwave services that may be small and may be affected by the rules and policies proposed herein. We note, however, that the common carrier microwave fixed licensee category includes some large entities. 44. 39 GHz Service. The Commission created a special small business size standard for 39 GHz licenses—an entity that has average gross revenues of $40 million or less in the three previous calendar years.177 An 172 See generally 13 CFR 121.201. 47 CFR 101 et seq. for common carrier fixed microwave services (except Multipoint Distribution Service). 174 Persons eligible under parts 80 and 90 of the Commission’s Rules can use Private OperationalFixed Microwave services. See 47 CFR parts 80 and 90. Stations in this service are called operationalfixed to distinguish them from common carrier and public fixed stations. Only the licensee may use the operational-fixed station, and only for communications related to the licensee’s commercial, industrial, or safety operations. 175 Auxiliary Microwave Service is governed by Part 74 of Title 47 of the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR part 74. This service is available to licensees of broadcast stations and to broadcast and cable network entities. Broadcast auxiliary microwave stations are used for relaying broadcast television signals from the studio to the transmitter, or between two points such as a main studio and an auxiliary studio. The service also includes mobile television pickups, which relay signals from a remote location back to the studio. 176 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 177 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding the 37.0–38.6 GHz and 38.6–40.0 GHz 173 See E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS additional size standard for ‘‘very small business’’ is: An entity that, together with affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more than $15 million for the preceding three calendar years.178 The SBA has approved these small business size standards.179 The auction of the 2,173, 39 GHz licenses, began and closed in 2000. The 18 bidders who claimed small business status won 849 licenses. 45. Local Multipoint Distribution Service. Local Multipoint Distribution Service (‘‘LMDS’’) is a fixed broadband point-tomultipoint microwave service that provides for two-way video telecommunications.180 The auction of the 986 LMDS licenses began and closed in 1998. The Commission established a small business size standard for LMDS licenses as an entity that has average gross revenues of less than $40 million in the three previous calendar years.181 An additional small business size standard for ‘‘very small business’’ was added as an entity that, together with its affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more than $15 million for the preceding three calendar years.182 The SBA has approved these small business size standards in the context of LMDS auctions.183 There were 93 winning bidders that qualified as small entities in the LMDS auctions. A total of 93 small and very small business bidders won approximately 277 A Block licenses and 387 B Block licenses. In 1999, the Commission re-auctioned 161 licenses; there were 32 small and very small businesses winning that won 119 licenses. 46. 218–219 MHz Service. The first auction of 218–219 MHz (previously referred to as the Interactive and Video Data Service or IVDS) spectrum resulted in 178 entities winning licenses for 594 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (‘‘MSAs’’).184 Of the 594 licenses, 567 were won by 167 entities qualifying as a small business. For that auction, the Commission defined a small business as an entity that, together with its affiliates, has no more than a $6 million net worth and, after Federal income taxes (excluding any carry over losses), has no more than $2 million in annual profits each Bands, ET Docket No. 95–183, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 18600 (1997). 178 Id. 179 See Letter from Aida Alvarez, Administrator, SBA, to Kathleen O’Brien Ham, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (Feb. 4, 1998); see Letter from Hector Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Margaret Wiener, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (Jan. 18, 2002). 180 See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the 27.5– 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, Reallocate the 29.5–30.5 Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12689–90, para. 348 (1997) (‘‘LMDS Second Report and Order’’). 181 See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12689–90, para. 348. 182 See id. 183 See Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998. 184 See ‘‘Interactive Video and Data Service (IVDS) Applications Accepted for Filing,’’ public notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6227 (1994). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 year for the previous two years.185 In the 218–219 MHz Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, we defined a small business as an entity that, together with its affiliates and persons or entities that hold interests in such an entity and their affiliates, has average annual gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.186 A very small business is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates and persons or entities that hold interests in such an entity and its affiliates, has average annual gross revenues not exceeding $3 million for the preceding three years.187 The SBA has approved of these definitions.188 A subsequent auction is not yet scheduled. Given the success of small businesses in the previous auction, and the prevalence of small businesses in the subscription television services and message communications industries, we assume for purposes of this analysis that in future auctions, many, and perhaps most, of the licenses may be awarded to small businesses. 47. Location and Monitoring Service (‘‘LMS’’). Multilateration LMS systems use non-voice radio techniques to determine the location and status of mobile radio units. For purposes of auctioning LMS licenses, the Commission has defined ‘‘small business’’ as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues for the preceding three years not exceeding $15 million.189 A ‘‘very small business’’ is defined as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues for the preceding three years not exceeding $3 million.190 These definitions have been approved by the SBA.191 An auction for LMS licenses commenced and closed in 1999. Of the 528 licenses auctioned, 289 licenses were sold to four small businesses. 48. Rural Radiotelephone Service. The Commission has not adopted a size standard for small businesses specific to the Rural Radiotelephone Service.192 A significant subset of the Rural Radiotelephone Service is the Basic Exchange Telephone Radio System (‘‘BETRS’’).193 In the present context, we will use the SBA’s small business size standard applicable to Wireless Telecommunications 185 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act—Competitive Bidding, Fourth Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2330 (1994). 186 Amendment of Part 95 of the Commission’s Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218– 219 MHz Service, Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 1497 (1999). 187 Id. 188 See Alvarez to Phythyon Letter 1998. 189 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15182, 15192, para. 20 (1998) (‘‘Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems Second Report and Order’’); see also 47 CFR 90.1103. 190 Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15192, para. 20; see also 47 CFR 90.1103. 191 See Alvarez Letter 1998. 192 The service is defined in section 22.99 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.99. 193 BETRS is defined in sections 22.757 and 22.759 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.757 and 22.759. PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21557 Carriers (except Satellite), i.e., an entity employing no more than 1,500 persons.194 There are approximately 1,000 licensees in the Rural Radiotelephone Service, and the Commission estimates that there are 1,000 or fewer small entity licensees in the Rural Radiotelephone Service that may be affected by the rules and policies proposed herein. 49. Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service.195 The Commission has previously used the SBA’s small business definition applicable to Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite), i.e., an entity employing no more than 1,500 persons.196 There are approximately 100 licensees in the AirGround Radiotelephone Service, and under that definition, we estimate that almost all of them qualify as small entities under the SBA definition. For purposes of assigning AirGround Radiotelephone Service licenses through competitive bidding, the Commission has defined ‘‘small business’’ as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues for the preceding three years not exceeding $40 million.197 A ‘‘very small business’’ is defined as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues for the preceding three years not exceeding $15 million.198 These definitions were approved by the SBA.199 In 2006, the Commission completed an auction of nationwide commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service licenses in the 800 MHz band (Auction 65). Later in 2006, the auction closed with two winning bidders winning two Air-Ground Radiotelephone Services licenses. Neither of the winning bidders claimed small business status. 50. Aviation and Marine Radio Services. There are approximately 26,162 aviation, 34,555 marine (ship), and 3,296 marine (coast) licensees.200 The Commission has not developed a small business size standard specifically applicable to all licensees. For purposes of this analysis, we will use the SBA small business size standard for the category Wireless Telecommunications 194 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. service is defined in section 22.99 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 22.99. 196 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 517210. 197 Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission’s Rules to Benefit the Consumers of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services, Biennial Regulatory Review—Amendment of Parts 1, 22, and 90 of the Commission’s Rules, Amendment of Parts 1 and 22 of the Commission’s Rules to Adopt Competitive Bidding Rules for Commercial and General Aviation Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service, WT Docket Nos. 03–103 and 05–42, Order on Reconsideration and Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19663, paras. 28–42 (2005). 198 Id. 199 See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, SBA, to Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB, FCC (Sept. 19, 2005). 200 Vessels that are not required by law to carry a radio and do not make international voyages or communications are not required to obtain an individual license. See Amendment of parts 80 and 87 of the Commission’s rules to Permit Operation of Certain Domestic Ship and Aircraft Radio Stations Without Individual Licenses, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 96–82, 11 FCC Rcd 14849 (1996). 195 The E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21558 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules Carriers (except Satellite), which is 1,500 or fewer employees.201 We are unable to determine how many of those licensed fall under this standard. For purposes of our evaluations in this analysis, we estimate that there are up to approximately 62,969 licensees that are small businesses under the SBA standard.202 In 1998, the Commission held an auction of 42 VHF Public Coast licenses in the 157.1875–157.4500 MHz (ship transmit) and 161.775–162.0125 MHz (coast transmit) bands. For this auction, the Commission defined a ‘‘small’’ business as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues for the preceding three years not to exceed $15 million dollars. In addition, a ‘‘very small’’ business is one that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues for the preceding three years not to exceed $3 million dollars.203 Further, the Commission made available Automated Maritime Telecommunications System (‘‘AMTS’’) licenses in Auctions 57 and 61.204 Winning bidders could claim status as a very small business or a small business. A very small business for this service is defined as an entity with attributed average annual gross revenues that do not exceed $3 million for the preceding three years, and a small business is defined as an entity with attributed average annual gross revenues of more than $3 million but less than $15 million for the preceding three years.205 Three of the winning bidders in Auction 57 qualified as small or very small businesses, while three winning entities in Auction 61 qualified as very small businesses. 51. Offshore Radiotelephone Service. This service operates on several ultra high frequencies (‘‘UHF’’) television broadcast channels that are not used for television broadcasting in the coastal areas of States bordering the Gulf of Mexico.206 There is presently 1 licensee in this service. We do not have information whether that licensee would qualify as small under the SBA’s small business size standard for Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) services.207 Under that SBA small business size standard, a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.208 201 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. licensee may have a license in more than one category. 203 Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, PR Docket No. 92–257, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19853 (1998). 204 See ‘‘Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Spectrum Auction Scheduled for September 15, 2004, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Auction Procedures,’’ public notice, 19 FCC Rcd 9518 (WTB 2004); ‘‘Auction of Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Licenses Scheduled for August 3, 2005, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Auction Procedures for Auction No. 61,’’ public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 7811 (WTB 2005). 205 47 CFR 80.1252. 206 This service is governed by subpart I of part 22 of the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR 22.1001– 22.1037. 207 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 208 Id. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 202 A VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 52. Multiple Address Systems (‘‘MAS’’). Entities using MAS spectrum, in general, fall into two categories: (1) Those using the spectrum for profit-based uses, and (2) those using the spectrum for private internal uses. With respect to the first category, the Commission defines ‘‘small entity’’ for MAS licenses as an entity that has average gross revenues of less than $15 million in the three previous calendar years.209 ‘‘Very small business’’ is defined as an entity that, together with its affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more than $3 million for the preceding three calendar years.210 The SBA has approved of these definitions.211 The majority of these entities will most likely be licensed in bands where the Commission has implemented a geographic area licensing approach that would require the use of competitive bidding procedures to resolve mutually exclusive applications. The Commission’s licensing database indicates that, as of March 5, 2010, there were over 11,500 MAS station authorizations. In addition, an auction for 5,104 MAS licenses in 176 EAs was conducted in 2001.212 Seven winning bidders claimed status as small or very small businesses and won 611 licenses. In 2005, the Commission completed an auction (Auction 59) of 4,226 MAS licenses in the Fixed Microwave Services from the 928/959 and 932/941 MHz bands. Twenty-six winning bidders won a total of 2,323 licenses. Of the 26 winning bidders in this auction, five claimed small business status and won 1,891 licenses. 53. With respect to the second category, which consists of entities that use, or seek to use, MAS spectrum to accommodate internal communications needs, we note that MAS serves an essential role in a range of industrial, safety, business, and land transportation activities. MAS radios are used by companies of all sizes, operating in virtually all U.S. business categories, and by all types of public safety entities. For the majority of private internal users, the small business size standard developed by the SBA would be more appropriate. The applicable size standard in this instance appears to be that of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This definition provides that a small entity is any such entity employing no more than 1,500 persons.213 The Commission’s licensing database indicates that, as of January 20, 1999, of the 8,670 total MAS station authorizations, 8,410 authorizations were for private radio service, and of these, 1,433 were for private land mobile radio service. 54. 1.4 GHz Band Licensees. The Commission conducted an auction of 64 1.4 GHz band licenses 214 in 2007.215 In that 209 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Multiple Address Systems, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 11956, 12008, para. 123 (2000). 210 Id. 211 See Alvarez Letter 1999. 212 See ‘‘Multiple Address Systems Spectrum Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 16 FCC Rcd 21011 (2001). 213 See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 214 See ‘‘Auction of 1.4 GHz Bands Licenses Scheduled for February 7, 2007,’’ public notice, 21 FCC Rcd 12393 (WTB 2006). 215 See ‘‘Auction of 1.4 GHz Band Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 69,’’ PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 auction, the Commission defined ‘‘small business’’ as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling interests, had average gross revenues that exceed $15 million but do not exceed $40 million for the preceding three years, and a ‘‘very small business’’ as an entity that, together with its affiliates and controlling interests, has had average annual gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.216 Neither of the two winning bidders sought designated entity status.217 55. Incumbent 24 GHz Licensees. This analysis may affect incumbent licensees who were relocated to the 24 GHz band from the 18 GHz band, and applicants who wish to provide services in the 24 GHz band. The applicable SBA small business size standard is that of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This category provides that such a company is small if it employs no more than 1,500 persons.218 The broader census data notwithstanding, we believe that there are only two licensees in the 24 GHz band that were relocated from the 18 GHz band, Teligent 219 and TRW, Inc. It is our understanding that Teligent and its related companies have fewer than 1,500 employees, though this may change in the future. TRW is not a small entity. There are approximately 122 licensees in the Rural Radiotelephone Service, and the Commission estimates that there are 122 or fewer small entity licensees in the Rural Radiotelephone Service that may be affected by the rules and policies proposed herein. 56. Future 24 GHz Licensees. With respect to new applicants in the 24 GHz band, we have defined ‘‘small business’’ as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues for the three preceding years not exceeding $15 million.220 ‘‘Very small business’’ in the 24 GHz band is defined as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $3 million for the preceding three years.221 The SBA has approved these definitions.222 The Commission will not know how many licensees will be small or very small businesses until the auction, if required, is held. 57. Broadband Radio Service and Educational Broadband Service. Broadband Radio Service systems, previously referred to as Multipoint Distribution Service (‘‘MDS’’) public notice, 22 FCC Rcd 4714 (2007) (‘‘Auction No. 69 Closing PN’’). 216 Auction No. 69 Closing PN, Attachment C. 217 See Auction No. 69 Closing PN. 218 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. 219 Teligent acquired the DEMS licenses of FirstMark, the only licensee other than TRW in the 24 GHz band whose license has been modified to require relocation to the 24 GHz band. 220 Amendments to Parts 1, 2, 87 and 101 of the Commission’s Rules To License Fixed Services at 24 GHz, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16934, 16967, para 77 (2000) (‘‘24 GHz Report and Order’’); see also 47 CFR 101.538(a)(2). 221 24 GHz Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 16967, para. 77; see also 47 CFR 101.538(a)(1). 222 See Letter from Gary M. Jackson, Assistant Administrator, SBA, to Margaret W. Wiener, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (July 28, 2000). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 21559 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS and Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (‘‘MMDS’’) systems, and ‘‘wireless cable,’’ transmit video programming to subscribers and provide two-way high speed data operations using the microwave frequencies of the Broadband Radio Service (‘‘BRS’’) and Educational Broadband Service (‘‘EBS’’) (previously referred to as the Instructional Television Fixed Service (‘‘ITFS’’)).223 In connection with the 1996 BRS auction, the Commission established a small business size standard as an entity that had annual average gross revenues of no more than $40 million in the previous three calendar years.224 The BRS auctions resulted in 67 successful bidders obtaining licensing opportunities for 493 Basic Trading Areas (‘‘BTAs’’). Of the 67 auction winners, 61 met the definition of a small business. BRS also includes licensees of stations authorized prior to the auction. At this time, we estimate that of the 61 small business BRS auction winners, 48 remain small business licensees. In addition to the 48 small businesses that hold BTA authorizations, there are approximately 392 incumbent BRS licensees that are considered small entities.225 After adding the number of small business auction licensees to the number of incumbent licensees not already counted, we find that there are currently approximately 440 BRS licensees that are defined as small businesses under either the SBA or the Commission’s rules. In 2009, the Commission conducted Auction 86, the sale of 78 licenses in the BRS areas.226 The Commission offered three levels of bidding credits: (i) A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceed $15 million and do not exceed $40 million for the preceding three years (small business) will receive a 15 percent discount on its winning bid; (ii) a bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceed $3 million and do not exceed $15 million for the preceding three years (very small business) will receive a 25 percent discount on its winning bid; and (iii) a bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that do not exceed $3 million for the preceding three years (entrepreneur) will receive a 35 percent discount on its winning bid.227 Auction 86 concluded in 2009 with the sale of 61 licenses.228 Of the ten winning bidders, two bidders that claimed small business status won 4 licenses; one bidder that claimed very small business status won three licenses; and two bidders that claimed entrepreneur status won six licenses. 58. In addition, the SBA’s Cable Television Distribution Services small business size standard is applicable to EBS. There are presently 2,032 EBS licensees. All but 100 of these licenses are held by educational institutions. Educational institutions are included in this analysis as small entities.229 Thus, we estimate that at least 1,932 licensees are small businesses. Since 2007, Cable Television Distribution Services have been defined within the broad economic census category of Wired Telecommunications Carriers; that category is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or a combination of technologies.’’230 The SBA has developed a small business size standard for this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees. To gauge small business prevalence for these cable services we must, however, use current census data that are based on the previous category of Cable and Other Program Distribution and its associated size standard; that size standard was: all such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts.231 According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in this previous category that operated for the entire year.232 Of this total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million.233 Thus, the majority of these firms can be considered small. 59. Television Broadcasting. This Economic Census category ‘‘comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting images together with sound. These establishments operate television broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the public.’’ 234 The SBA has created the following small business size standard for Television Broadcasting firms: those having $14 million or less in annual receipts.235 The Commission has estimated the number of licensed commercial television stations to be 1,395.236 In addition, according to Commission staff review of the BIA Publications, Inc., Master Access Television Analyzer Database (BIA) on March 30, 2007, about 986 of an estimated 1,395 commercial television stations (or approximately 72 percent) had revenues of $13 million or less.237 We therefore estimate that the majority of commercial television broadcasters are small entities. 60. We note, however, that in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above definition, business (control) affiliations 238 must be included. Our estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of small entities that might be affected by our action, because the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from affiliated companies. In addition, an element of the definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. We are unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific television station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply does not exclude any television station from the definition of a small business on this basis and is therefore possibly over-inclusive to that extent. 61. In addition, the Commission has estimated the number of licensed noncommercial educational (NCE) television stations to be 390.239 These stations are nonprofit, and therefore considered to be small entities.240 62. In addition, there are also 2,386 low power television stations (LPTV).241 Given the nature of this service, we will presume that all LPTV licensees qualify as small entities under the above SBA small business size standard. 63. Radio Broadcasting. This Economic Census category ‘‘comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting aural programs by radio to the public. Programming may originate in their own 223 Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission’s Rules with Regard to Filing Procedures in the Multipoint Distribution Service and in the Instructional Television Fixed Service and Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act—Competitive Bidding, MM Docket No. 94–131 and PP Docket No. 93–253, Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9589, 9593, para 7 (1995) (‘‘MDS Auction R&O’’). 224 47 CFR 21.961(b)(1). 225 47 U.S.C. 309(j). Hundreds of stations were licensed to incumbent MDS licensees prior to implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 309(j). For these pre-auction licenses, the applicable standard is SBA’s small business size standard. 226 Auction of Broadband Radio Service (BRS) Licenses, Scheduled for October 27, 2009, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for Auction 86, public notice, 24 FCC Rcd 8277 (2009). 227 Id. at 8296. 228 Auction of Broadband Radio Service Licenses Closes, Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 86, Down Payments Due November 23, 2009, Final Payments Due December 8, 2009, Ten-Day Petition to Deny Period, public notice, 24 FCC Rcd 13572 (2009). 229 The term ‘‘small entity’’ within SBREFA applies to small organizations (nonprofits) and to small governmental jurisdictions (cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, and special districts with populations of less than 50,000). 5 U.S.C. 601(4)–(6). We do not collect annual revenue data on EBS licensees. 230 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’ (partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/ 2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110. 231 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 232 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). 233 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 234 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘515120 Television Broadcasting’’ (partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ ND515120.HTM#N515120. 235 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120 (updated for inflation in 2008). 236 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4, 2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC–280836A1.pdf. 237 We recognize that BIA’s estimate differs slightly from the FCC total given supra. 238 ‘‘[Business concerns] are affiliates of each other when one concern controls or has the power to control the other or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both.’’ 13 CFR 21.103(a)(1). 239 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4, 2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC-280836A1.pdf. 240 See generally 5 U.S.C. 601(4), (6). 241 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Totals as of June 30, 2009,’’ dated September 4, 2009; https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ Daily_Business/2008/db0318/DOC-280836A1.pdf. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21560 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS studio, from an affiliated network, or from external sources.’’ 242 The SBA has established a small business size standard for this category, which is: such firms having $7 million or less in annual receipts.243 According to Commission staff review of BIA Publications, Inc.’s Master Access Radio Analyzer Database on March 31, 2005, about 10,840 (95%) of 11,410 commercial radio stations had revenues of $6 million or less. Therefore, the majority of such entities are small entities. 64. We note, however, that in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above size standard, business affiliations must be included.244 In addition, to be determined to be a ‘‘small business,’’ the entity may not be dominant in its field of operation.245 We note that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media entities, and our estimate of small businesses may therefore be over-inclusive. 65. Auxiliary, Special Broadcast and Other Program Distribution Services. This service involves a variety of transmitters, generally used to relay broadcast programming to the public (through translator and booster stations) or within the program distribution chain (from a remote news gathering unit back to the station). The Commission has not developed a definition of small entities applicable to broadcast auxiliary licensees. The applicable definitions of small entities are those, noted previously, under the SBA rules applicable to radio broadcasting stations and television broadcasting stations.246 66. The Commission estimates that there are approximately 5,618 FM translators and boosters.247 The Commission does not collect financial information on any broadcast facility, and the Department of Commerce does not collect financial information on these auxiliary broadcast facilities. We believe that most, if not all, of these auxiliary facilities could be classified as small businesses by themselves. We also recognize that most commercial translators and boosters are owned by a parent station which, in some cases, would be covered by the revenue definition of small business entity discussed above. These stations would likely have annual revenues that exceed the SBA maximum to be designated as a small business ($7.0 million for a radio station or $14.0 million for a TV station). Furthermore, they do not meet the Small Business Act’s definition of a ‘‘small business concern’’ because they are not independently owned and operated.248 242 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘515112 Radio Stations’’; https://www.census.gov/ naics/2007/def/ND515112.HTM#N515112. 243 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515112 (updated for inflation in 2008). 244 ‘‘Concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.’’ 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1) (an SBA regulation). 245 13 CFR 121.102(b) (an SBA regulation). 246 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS codes 515112 and 515120. 247 See supra note 242. 248 See 15 U.S.C. 632. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 67. Cable Television Distribution Services. Since 2007, these services have been defined within the broad economic census category of Wired Telecommunications Carriers; that category is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or a combination of technologies.’’ 249 The SBA has developed a small business size standard for this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees. To gauge small business prevalence for these cable services we must, however, use current census data that are based on the previous category of Cable and Other Program Distribution and its associated size standard; that size standard was: all such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts.250 According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in this previous category that operated for the entire year.251 Of this total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million.252 Thus, the majority of these firms can be considered small. 68. Cable Companies and Systems. The Commission has also developed its own small business size standards, for the purpose of cable rate regulation. Under the Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small cable company’’ is one serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers, nationwide.253 Industry data indicate that, of 1,076 cable operators nationwide, all but eleven are small under this size standard.254 In addition, under the Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small system’’ is a cable system serving 15,000 or fewer subscribers.255 Industry data indicate that, of 6,635 systems nationwide, 5,802 systems have under 10,000 subscribers, and an additional 302 systems have 10,000– 19,999 subscribers.256 Thus, under this 249 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’ (partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/ 2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110. 250 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 251 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). 252 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 253 47 CFR 76.901(e). The Commission determined that this size standard equates approximately to a size standard of $100 million or less in annual revenues. Implementation of Sections of the 1992 Cable Act: Rate Regulation, Sixth Report and Order and Eleventh Order on Reconsideration, 10 FCC Rcd 7393, 7408 (1995). 254 These data are derived from: R.R. Bowker, Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006, ‘‘Top 25 Cable/Satellite Operators,’’ pages A–8 & C–2 (data current as of June 30, 2005); Warren Communications News, Television & Cable Factbook 2006, ‘‘Ownership of Cable Systems in the United States,’’ pages D–1805 to D–1857. 255 47 CFR 76.901(c). 256 Warren Communications News, Television & Cable Factbook 2008, ‘‘U.S. Cable Systems by Subscriber Size,’’ page F–2 (data current as of Oct. 2007). The data do not include 851 systems for which classifying data were not available. PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 second size standard, most cable systems are small. 69. Cable System Operators. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, also contains a size standard for small cable system operators, which is ‘‘a cable operator that, directly or through an affiliate, serves in the aggregate fewer than 1 percent of all subscribers in the United States and is not affiliated with any entity or entities whose gross annual revenues in the aggregate exceed $250,000,000.’’ 257 The Commission has determined that an operator serving fewer than 677,000 subscribers shall be deemed a small operator, if its annual revenues, when combined with the total annual revenues of all its affiliates, do not exceed $250 million in the aggregate.258 Industry data indicate that, of 1,076 cable operators nationwide, all but ten are small under this size standard.259 We note that the Commission neither requests nor collects information on whether cable system operators are affiliated with entities whose gross annual revenues exceed $250 million,260 and therefore we are unable to estimate more accurately the number of cable system operators that would qualify as small under this size standard. 70. Open Video Systems. The open video system (‘‘OVS’’) framework was established in 1996, and is one of four statutorily recognized options for the provision of video programming services by local exchange carriers.261 The OVS framework provides opportunities for the distribution of video programming other than through cable systems. Because OVS operators provide subscription services,262 OVS falls within the SBA small business size standard covering cable services, which is ‘‘Wired Telecommunications Carriers.’’ 263 The SBA has developed a small business size standard for this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees. To gauge small business prevalence for such services we must, however, use current census data that are based on the previous category of 257 47 U.S.C. 543(m)(2); see 47 CFR 76.901(f) & nn. 1–3. 258 47 CFR 76.901(f); see public notice, FCC Announces New Subscriber Count for the Definition of Small Cable Operator, DA 01–158 (Cable Services Bureau, Jan. 24, 2001). 259 These data are derived from: R.R. Bowker, Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006, ‘‘Top 25 Cable/Satellite Operators,’’ pages A–8 & C–2 (data current as of June 30, 2005); Warren Communications News, Television & Cable Factbook 2006, ‘‘Ownership of Cable Systems in the United States,’’ pages D–1805 to D–1857. 260 The Commission does receive such information on a case-by-case basis if a cable operator appeals a local franchise authority’s finding that the operator does not qualify as a small cable operator pursuant to section 76.901(f) of the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR 76.909(b). 261 47 U.S.C. 571(a)(3)–(4). See Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Thirteenth Annual Report, 24 FCC Rcd 542, 606 para. 135 (2009) (‘‘Thirteenth Annual Cable Competition Report’’). 262 See 47 U.S.C. 573. 263 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ ND517110.HTM#N517110. E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules Cable and Other Program Distribution and its associated size standard; that size standard was: all such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts.264 According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in this previous category that operated for the entire year.265 Of this total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million.266 Thus, the majority of cable firms can be considered small. In addition, we note that the Commission has certified some OVS operators, with some now providing service.267 Broadband service providers (‘‘BSPs’’) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises.268 The Commission does not have financial or employment information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. Thus, again, at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. 71. Cable Television Relay Service. This service includes transmitters generally used to relay cable programming within cable television system distribution systems. This cable service is defined within the broad economic census category of Wired Telecommunications Carriers; that category is defined as follows: ‘‘This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or a combination of technologies.’’ 269 The SBA has developed a small business size standard for this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees. To gauge small business prevalence for cable services we must, however, use current census data that are based on the previous category of Cable and Other Program Distribution and its associated size standard; that size standard was: all such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts.270 According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in this previous category that operated for the entire year.271 Of this total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 264 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). 266 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 267 A list of OVS certifications may be found at https://www.fcc.gov/mb/ovs/csovscer.html. 268 See Thirteenth Annual Cable Competition Report, 24 FCC Rcd at 606–07 para. 135. BSPs are newer firms that are building state-of-the-art, facilities-based networks to provide video, voice, and data services over a single network. 269 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’ (partial definition); https://www.census.gov/naics/ 2007/def/ND517110.HTM#N517110. 270 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. 271 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 265 U.S. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million.272 Thus, the majority of these firms can be considered small. 72. Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service. MVDDS is a terrestrial fixed microwave service operating in the 12.2–12.7 GHz band. The Commission adopted criteria for defining three groups of small businesses for purposes of determining their eligibility for special provisions such as bidding credits. It defined a very small business as an entity with average annual gross revenues not exceeding $3 million for the preceding three years; a small business as an entity with average annual gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years; and an entrepreneur as an entity with average annual gross revenues not exceeding $40 million for the preceding three years.273 These definitions were approved by the SBA.274 On January 27, 2004, the Commission completed an auction of 214 MVDDS licenses (Auction No. 53). In this auction, ten winning bidders won a total of 192 MVDDS licenses.275 Eight of the ten winning bidders claimed small business status and won 144 of the licenses. The Commission also held an auction of MVDDS licenses on December 7, 2005 (Auction 63). Of the three winning bidders who won 22 licenses, two winning bidders, winning 21 of the licenses, claimed small business status.276 73. Amateur Radio Service. These licensees are held by individuals in a noncommercial capacity; these licensees are not small entities. 74. Aviation and Marine Services. Small businesses in the aviation and marine radio services use a very high frequency (‘‘VHF’’) marine or aircraft radio and, as appropriate, an emergency position-indicating radio beacon (and/or radar) or an emergency locator transmitter. The Commission has not developed a small business size standard specifically applicable to these small businesses. For purposes of this analysis, the Commission uses the SBA small business size standard for the category Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except 272 Id. An additional 61 firms had annual receipts of $25 million or more. 273 Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co-Frequency with GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band Frequency Range; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the 12.2– 12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast Satellite Licenses and their Affiliates; and Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and Satellite Receivers, Ltd. to provide A Fixed Service in the 12.2–12.7 GHz Band, ET Docket No. 98–206, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9614, 9711, para. 252 (2002). 274 See Letter from Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration, to Margaret W. Wiener, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB, FCC (Feb.13, 2002). 275 See ‘‘Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service Auction Closes,’’ public notice, 19 FCC Rcd 1834 (2004). 276 See Auction of Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service Licenses Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction No. 63, public notice, 20 FCC Rcd 19807 (2005). PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21561 Satellite), which is 1,500 or fewer employees.277 Most applicants for recreational licenses are individuals. Approximately 581,000 ship station licensees and 131,000 aircraft station licensees operate domestically and are not subject to the radio carriage requirements of any statute or treaty. For purposes of our evaluations in this analysis, we estimate that there are up to approximately 712,000 licensees that are small businesses (or individuals) under the SBA standard. In addition, between December 3, 1998 and December 14, 1998, the Commission held an auction of 42 VHF Public Coast licenses in the 157.1875– 157.4500 MHz (ship transmit) and 161.775– 162.0125 MHz (coast transmit) bands. For purposes of the auction, the Commission defined a ‘‘small’’ business as an entity that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues for the preceding three years not to exceed $15 million dollars. In addition, a ‘‘very small’’ business is one that, together with controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues for the preceding three years not to exceed $3 million dollars.278 There are approximately 10,672 licensees in the Marine Coast Service, and the Commission estimates that almost all of them qualify as ‘‘small’’ businesses under the above special small business size standards. 75. Personal Radio Services. Personal radio services provide short-range, low power radio for personal communications, radio signaling, and business communications not provided for in other services. The Personal Radio Services include spectrum licensed under Part 95 of our rules.279 These services include Citizen Band Radio Service (‘‘CB’’), General Mobile Radio Service (‘‘GMRS’’), Radio Control Radio Service (‘‘R/C’’), Family Radio Service (‘‘FRS’’), Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (‘‘WMTS’’), Medical Implant Communications Service (‘‘MICS’’), Low Power Radio Service (‘‘LPRS’’), and Multi-Use Radio Service (‘‘MURS’’).280 There are a variety of methods used to license the spectrum in these rule parts, from licensing by rule, to conditioning operation on successful completion of a required test, to site-based licensing, to geographic area licensing. Under the RFA, the Commission is required to make a determination of which small entities are directly affected by the rules being proposed. Since all such entities are wireless, we apply the definition of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite), pursuant to which a small entity is defined as employing 1,500 or fewer 277 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517210. of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19853 (1998). 279 47 CFR Part 90. 280 The Citizens Band Radio Service, General Mobile Radio Service, Radio Control Radio Service, Family Radio Service, Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, Medical Implant Communications Service, Low Power Radio Service, and Multi-Use Radio Service are governed by subpart D, subpart A, subpart C, subpart B, subpart H, subpart I, subpart G, and subpart J, respectively, of Part 95 of the Commission’s rules. See generally 47 CFR Part 95. 278 Amendment E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21562 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules persons.281 Many of the licensees in these services are individuals, and thus are not small entities. In addition, due to the mostly unlicensed and shared nature of the spectrum utilized in many of these services, the Commission lacks direct information upon which to base an estimation of the number of small entities under an SBA definition that might be directly affected by the proposed rules. 76. Public Safety Radio Services. Public Safety radio services include police, fire, local government, forestry conservation, highway maintenance, and emergency medical services.282 There are a total of approximately 127,540 licensees in these services. Governmental entities 283 as well as private businesses comprise the licensees for these services. All governmental entities with populations of less than 50,000 fall within the definition of a small entity.284 77. Internet Service Providers. The 2007 Economic Census places these firms, whose services might include voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), in either of two categories, depending on whether the service is provided over the provider’s own telecommunications connections (e.g. cable and DSL, ISPs), or over client-supplied telecommunications connections (e.g. dial-up ISPs). The former are within the category of Wired Telecommunications Carriers,285 which has an SBA small business size standard of 1,500 or fewer employees.286 The WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 281 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210. 282 With the exception of the special emergency service, these services are governed by subpart B of part 90 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 90.15– 90.27. The police service includes approximately 27,000 licensees that serve State, county, and municipal enforcement through telephony (voice), telegraphy (code) and teletype and facsimile (printed material). The fire radio service includes approximately 23,000 licensees comprised of private volunteer or professional fire companies as well as units under governmental control. The local government service that is presently comprised of approximately 41,000 licensees that are State, county, or municipal entities that use the radio for official purposes not covered by other public safety services. There are approximately 7,000 licensees within the forestry service which is comprised of licensees from State departments of conservation and private forest organizations who set up communications networks among fire lookout towers and ground crews. The approximately 9,000 State and local governments are licensed to highway maintenance service provide emergency and routine communications to aid other public safety services to keep main roads safe for vehicular traffic. The approximately 1,000 licensees in the Emergency Medical Radio Service (‘‘EMRS’’) use the 39 channels allocated to this service for emergency medical service communications related to the delivery of emergency medical treatment. 47 CFR 90.15–90.27. The approximately 20,000 licensees in the special emergency service include medical services, rescue organizations, veterinarians, handicapped persons, disaster relief organizations, school buses, beach patrols, establishments in isolated areas, communications standby facilities, and emergency repair of public communications facilities. 47 CFR 90.33–90.55. 283 47 CFR 1.1162. 284 5 U.S.C. 601(5). 285 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers’’, https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ ND517110.HTM#N517110. 286 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110 (updated for inflation in 2008). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 latter are within the category of All Other Telecommunications,287 which has a size standard of annual receipts of $25 million or less.288 The most current Census Bureau data for all such firms, however, are the 2002 data for the previous census category called Internet Service Providers.289 That category had a small business size standard of $21 million or less in annual receipts, which was revised in late 2005 to $23 million. The 2002 data show that there were 2,529 such firms that operated for the entire year.290 Of those, 2,437 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and an additional 47 firms had receipts of between $10 million and $24,999,999.291 Consequently, we estimate that the majority of ISP firms are small entities. 78. The ISP industry has changed dramatically since 2002. The 2002 data cited above may therefore include entities that no longer provide Internet access service and may exclude entities that now provide such service. To ensure that this (IRFA/FRFA) describes the universe of small entities that our action might affect, we discuss in turn several different types of entities that might be providing Internet access service. 79. We note that, although we have no specific information on the number of small entities that provide Internet access service over unlicensed spectrum, we include these entities in our IRFA/FRFA. IV. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements 80. With certain exceptions, the Commission’s Schedule of Regulatory Fees applies to all Commission licensees and regulatees. Most licensees will be required to count the number of licenses or call signs authorized, complete and submit an FCC Form 159 Remittance Advice, and pay a regulatory fee based on the number of licenses or call signs.292 Interstate telephone 287 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517919 All Other Telecommunications’’; https:// www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ ND517919.HTM#N517919. 288 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517919 (updated for inflation in 2008). 289 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘518111 Internet Service Providers’’; https:// www.census.gov/eped/naics02/def/NDEF518.HTM. 290 U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code 518111 (issued Nov. 2005). 291 An additional 45 firms had receipts of $25 million or more. 292 See 47 CFR 1.1162 for the general exemptions from regulatory fees. E.g., Amateur radio licensees (except applicants for vanity call signs) and operators in other non-licensed services (e.g., Personal Radio, part 15, ship and aircraft). Governments and non-profit (exempt under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code) entities are exempt from payment of regulatory fees and need not submit payment. Non-commercial educational broadcast licensees are exempt from regulatory fees as are licensees of auxiliary broadcast services such as low power auxiliary stations, television auxiliary service stations, remote pickup stations and aural broadcast auxiliary stations where such licenses are used in conjunction with commonly owned noncommercial educational stations. Emergency Alert System licenses for auxiliary service facilities are PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 service providers must compute their annual regulatory fee based on their interstate and international end-user revenue using information they already supply to the Commission in compliance with the Form 499–A, Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, and they must complete and submit the FCC Form 159. Compliance with the fee schedule will require some licensees to tabulate the number of units (e.g., cellular telephones, pagers, cable TV subscribers) they have in service when they complete and submit the FCC Form 159. Licensees ordinarily will keep a list of the number of units they have in service as part of their normal business practices. No additional outside professional skills are required to complete the FCC Form 159, and it can be completed by the employees responsible for an entity’s business records. 81. As discussed previously in this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission concluded in its FY 2009 regulatory fee cycle that licensees filing their annual regulatory fee payments must begin the process by entering the Commission’s Fee Filer system with a valid FRN and password. In some instances, it will be necessary to use a specific FRN and password that is linked to a particular regulatory fee bill. Going forward, the submission of hardcopy Form 159 documents will not be permitted for making a regulatory fee payment during the regulatory fee cycle. By requiring licensees to use Fee Filer to begin the regulatory fee payment process, errors resulting from illegible handwriting on hardcopy Form 159’s will be reduced, and we will create an electronic record of licensee payment attributes that are more easily traced than those payments that are simply mailed in with a hardcopy Form 159. 82. Licensees and regulatees are advised that failure to submit the required regulatory fee in a timely manner will subject the licensee or regulatee to a late payment penalty of 25 percent in addition to the required fee.293 If payment is not received, new or pending applications may be dismissed, and existing authorizations may be subject to rescission.294 Further, in accordance with the DCIA, Federal agencies may bar a person or entity from obtaining a Federal loan or loan insurance guarantee if that person or entity fails to pay a delinquent debt owed to any Federal agency.295 Nonpayment of regulatory fees is a debt owed to the United States pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 et seq., and the DCIA. Appropriate also exempt as are instructional television fixed service licensees. Regulatory fees are automatically waived for the licensee of any translator station that: (1) Is not licensed to, in whole or in part, and does not have common ownership with, the licensee of a commercial broadcast station; (2) does not derive income from advertising; and (3) is dependent on subscriptions or contributions from members of the community served for support. Receive only earth station permittees are exempt from payment of regulatory fees. A regulatee will be relieved of its fee payment requirement if its total fee due, including all categories of fees for which payment is due by the entity, amounts to less than $10. 293 47 CFR 1.1164. 294 47 CFR 1.1164(c). 295 Public Law 104–134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules enforcement measures, as well as administrative and judicial remedies, may be exercised by the Commission. Debts owed to the Commission may result in a person or entity being denied a Federal loan or loan guarantee pending before another Federal agency until such obligations are paid.296 83. The Commission’s rules currently provide for relief in exceptional circumstances. Persons or entities may request a waiver, reduction or deferment of payment of the regulatory fee.297 However, timely submission of the required regulatory fee must accompany requests for waivers or reductions. This will avoid any late payment penalty if the request is denied. The fee will be refunded if the request is granted. In exceptional and compelling instances (e.g., where payment of the regulatory fee along with the waiver or reduction request could result in reduction of service to a community CFR 1.1164. 294 47 CFR 1.1164(c). WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 293 47 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 or other financial hardship to the licensee), the Commission will defer payment in response to a request filed with the appropriate supporting documentation. V. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered 84. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its approach, which may include the following four alternatives, among others: (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 21563 for small entities.298 In this NPRM, we seek comment on alternatives that might simplify our fee procedures or otherwise benefit filers, including small entities, while remaining consistent with our statutory responsibilities in this proceeding. 85. Several categories of licensees and regulatees are exempt from payment of regulatory fees. Also, waiver procedures provide regulatees, including small entity regulatees, relief in exceptional circumstances. We note that small entities should be assisted by our implementation of the Fee Filer program, and that we have continued our practice of exempting fees whose total sum owed is less than $10.00. VI. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules 86. None. BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 295 Public E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM Law 104–134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). 26APP1 VerDate Nov<24>2008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.006</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21564 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 21565 EP26AP10.007</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules VerDate Nov<24>2008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1 EP26AP10.008</GPH> WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 21566 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 79 / Monday, April 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules [FR Doc. 2010–9553 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108; Lamp, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment; Denial of Petition for Rulemaking WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking. SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW) requested a modification to the motorcycle headlighting system location requirements for a single headlamp with multiple light sources. The current standard requires that the light sources contained in a single motorcycle headlamp containing multiple light sources be located on the vertical centerline of the vehicle or horizontally disposed about the vertical centerline and mounted at the same height. BMW requested that the location requirements be based on the axes of reference instead of the light sources. For compliance testing purposes, the agency utilizes the manufacturer’s specified optical axis marking. As NHTSA explained in a letter of interpretation to Mr. Kiminori,1 the optical axis is determined by the manufacturer in the certification process. Our lighting standard does not currently have requirements to specify where the optical axis marking must be located and we note that a modification of the standard, as requested by BMW, would effectively remove the location requirements for a single motorcycle headlamp with multiple light sources. Therefore, NHTSA is denying BMW’s petition. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues, you may call Mr. Markus Price, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards (Phone: 202–366–0098; FAX: 202–366–7002). For legal issues, you may call Mr. J. Edward Glancy Office of the Chief Counsel (Phone: 202–366–2992; FAX: 202–366–3820). You may send mail to these officials at: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of polar bears through Letters of Authorization issued under 16 U.S.C. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:22 Apr 23, 2010 Jkt 220001 Background Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108; Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment, establishes lighting requirements for motor vehicles.2 Motorcycle headlamp systems that contain a single headlamp with multiple light sources must be arranged according to the requirements of paragraph S7.9.6.2.3 S7.9.6.2(a) requires that ‘‘If the headlamp contains more than one light source, each light source shall be mounted on the vertical centerline with the upper beam no higher than the lower beam, or horizontally disposed about the vertical centerline and mounted at the same height.’’ BMW Group Petition On October 10, 2008, BMW North America, LLC (BMW) petitioned the agency requesting that the requirements for a motorcycle headlighting system, containing a single headlamp, with multiple light sources, be modified. BMW stated that the purpose of its petition was to harmonize the requirements of FMVSS No. 108 with the similar European Communities (ECE) regulation No. 53 requirements, which have location requirements relative to the vehicle based on the axis of reference rather than the physical filaments in the lamp. Specifically, BMW requested that paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 4 of the reorganized standard be amended from the sentence quoted above in ‘‘Background,’’ to read as follows: S10.17.1.1.2 If the headlamp contains more than one light source, each axis of reference must be located on the vertical centerline with the upper beam no higher than the lower beam, or horizontally disposed about the vertical centerline and located at the same height.5 BMW stated that ‘‘when using modern, state of the art asymmetrical reflectors, the center of reference is, because of the reflector surface, slightly differently located compared to the 2 49 CFR 571.108 (2009). the amended standard, this requirement is found in paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 and paragraph S10.17.1.1.3. See 72 FR 68234 (Dec. 4, 2007). In a December 2007 final rule, NHTSA rewrote and reorganized FMVSS No. 108 to provide a more straightforward and logical presentation of the applicable regulatory requirements. Id. The effective date of those amendments has been delayed to December 1, 2012. 74 FR 58214 (Nov. 12, 2009). 4 Paragraph S10.17.1.1.2 of the reorganized standard is identical to the same sentence currently found in paragraph S7.9.6.2(a), i.e., the requirement prior to the 2007 reorganization of the standard. See 72 FR 68234, 68283. 5 Id. (emphasis added). 21567 original light source. The center of reference is the basis for all photometric measurement, which are required by the ECE regulation.’’ BMW also stated that its requested modification would harmonize FMVSS No. 108 with ECE Regulation No. 53, and would have no negative impact on traffic safety. Analysis In consideration of this petition, the agency reviewed the use of the defined term ‘‘axis of reference’’ in order to evaluate the appropriate use of this term within paragraph S10.14.1.1.2. The axis of reference is defined as the following: Axis of reference means the characteristic axis of the lamp for use as the direction of reference (H = 0°, V = 0°) for angles of field or photometric measurements and for installing the lamp on the vehicle.6 The term ‘‘axis of reference’’ is used in two key areas within the standard. First, the axis of reference is used in the determination of the effective projected luminous lens area.7 The other key area in which this term is used is, in determination of the mounting height of various lamps. Lamps mounted with their axis of reference less than 750 millimeters (mm) above the road surface may meet the photometric requirements for the test points located below 5° down at 5° down, rather than at the specified required downward angle. This general concept applies to various lamps and is listed in the table of photometric requirements for each lamp to which it applies.8 The agency has also used the term ‘‘axis of reference’’ in a key guidance letter. In a letter to Mr. Kiminori, the agency explains the flexibility manufacturers have in the establishment of the optical marking and therefore the location of the axis of reference. The agency stated, ‘‘Paragraph S7.8.5.3(f) [paragraph numeration prior to the technical rewrite of 2007] of FMVSS No. 108 requires that a visually/optically aimed headlamp include a mark or markings identifying the optical axis of the headlamp. The location of this mark or markings is to be determined by the 3 In PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 6 49 CFR 571.108 S4, Definitions. projected luminous lens area means the area of the orthogonal projection of the effective light-emitting surface of a lamp on a plane perpendicular to a defined direction relative to the axis of reference. Unless otherwise specified, the direction is coincident with the axis of reference.’’ Id. 8 See 72 FR 68234, 68301–68327 (Tables V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIV, XVI, XVII) (noting in Table footnotes that where various lamps are ‘‘mounted with their axis of reference less than 750 mm above the road surface, photometry requirements below 5° down may be met at 5° down rather than at the specified requirement downward angle’’). 7 ‘‘Effective E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM 26APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21536-21567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[MD Docket No. 10-87; FCC 10-51]


Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2010

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will revise its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in 
order to recover an amount of $335,794,000 that Congress has required 
the Commission to collect for fiscal year 2010. Section 9 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, provides for the annual 
assessment and collection of regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2) and 
9(b)(3), respectively, for annual ``Mandatory Adjustments'' and 
``Permitted Amendments'' to the Schedule of Regulatory Fees.

DATES: Comments are due May 4, 2010, and reply comments are due May 11, 
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MD Docket No. 10-87, 
by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Federal Communications Commission's Web site: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include MD Docket No. 10-87 in the 
subject line of the message.
     Mail: Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal 
Service Express Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to 9300 East 
Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-
class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing 
Director at (202) 418-0444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Adopted: April 12, 2010.
    Released: April 13, 2010.
    By the Commission.

Table of Contents

 
                                                               Paragraph
 
I. Introduction.............................................           1
    A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology........           2
        1. AM and FM Radio Stations.........................           4
        2. Submarine Cable Methodology......................           5
    B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service             7
     Television Broadcasters................................
    C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power,               8
     Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters...................
    D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service....           9
    E. Administrative and Operational Issues................          10
        1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer.......................          11
        2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees...          12
            a. Pre-Bills....................................          12
II. Procedural Matters......................................          13
    A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets.......................          14
    B. Assessment Notifications.............................          15
        1. Media Services Licensees.........................          15
        2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments....          18
    C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process...........          21
        1. Cable Television Subscribers.....................          21
        2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers...............          22
        3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers            23
         (``ITSP'').........................................
    D. Payment of Regulatory Fees...........................          24
        1. Lock Box Bank....................................          24
        2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments.................          25
        3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees.......................          26
        4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates......          27

[[Page 21537]]

 
    E. Enforcement..........................................          28
    F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis..............          30
    G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis.....          31
    H. Congressional Review Act Analysis....................          32
    I. Ex Parte Rules.......................................          33
    J. Filing Requirements..................................          34
III. Ordering Clauses.......................................          39
Appendix A Calculation of FY 2010 Revenue Requirements and
 Pro-Rata Fees
Appendix B FY 2010 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
Appendix C Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010
Appendix D Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go
 Into Determining Station Signal Contours and Associated
 Population Coverages
Appendix E Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Appendix F FY 2009 Schedule of Regulatory Fees
 

I. Introduction

    1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we propose to collect 
$335,794,000 in regulatory fees for Fiscal Year (``FY'') 2010, pursuant 
to section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the 
``Act''). Section 9 regulatory fees are mandated by Congress and are 
collected to recover the regulatory costs associated with the 
Commission's enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and 
international activities.\1\ The annual regulatory fee amount to be 
collected is established each year in the Commission's Annual 
Appropriations Act which is adopted by Congress and signed by the 
President and which funds the Commission.\2\ In this annual regulatory 
fee proceeding, we retain many of the established methods, policies, 
and procedures for collecting section 9 regulatory fees adopted by the 
Commission in prior years. Consistent with our established practice, we 
intend to collect these regulatory fees during an August 2010 filing 
window in order to collect the required amount by the end of our fiscal 
year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a).
    \2\ See Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-
117 for the FY 2010 appropriations act language for the Commission 
establishing the amount of $335,794,000 of offsetting collections to 
be assessed and collected by the Commission pursuant to section 9 of 
the Communications Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. FY 2010 Regulatory Fee Assessment Methodology

    2. In our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment, we will use the same 
section 9 regulatory fee assessment methodology adopted in FY 2009. 
Each fiscal year, the Commission proportionally allocates the total 
amount that must be collected via section 9 regulatory fees. The 
results of our FY 2010 regulatory fee assessment methodology (including 
a comparison to the prior year's results) are contained in Appendix A. 
To collect the $335,794,000 required by Congress, we adjust the FY 2009 
amount downward by 1.8 percent and allocate this amount across the 
various fee categories. Consistent with past practice, we then divide 
the FY 2010 amount by the number of estimated payment units in each fee 
category to determine the unit fee.\3\ As in prior years, for cases 
involving small fees, e.g., licenses that are renewed over a multiyear 
term, we divide the resulting unit fee by the term of the license and 
then rounded these unit fees consistent with the requirements of 
section 9(b)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In many instances, the regulatory fee amount is a flat fee 
per licensee or regulatee. In some instances, the fee amount 
represents a per-unit fee (such as for International Bearer 
Circuits), a per-unit subscriber fee (such as for Cable, Commercial 
Mobile Radio Service (``CMRS'') Cellular/Mobile and CMRS Messaging), 
or a fee factor per revenue dollar (Interstate Telecommunications 
Service Provider (``ITSP'') fee). The payment unit is the measure 
upon which the fee is based, such as a licensee, regulatee, or 
subscriber fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. In calculating the FY 2010 regulatory fees listed in Appendix B, 
we further adjusted the FY 2009 list of payment units (see Appendix C) 
based upon licensee databases, industry and trade group projections, as 
well as prior year payment information. In some instances, Commission 
licensee databases were used; in other instances, actual prior year 
payment records and/or industry and trade association projections were 
used in determining the payment unit counts.\4\ Where appropriate, we 
adjusted and rounded our final estimates to take into consideration 
events that may impact the number of units for which regulatees submit 
payment, such as waivers and exemptions that may be filed in FY 2010, 
and fluctuations in the number of licenses or station operators due to 
economic, technical, or other reasons. Our estimated FY 2010 payment 
units, therefore, are based on several variable factors that are 
relevant to each fee category. The fee rate also may be rounded or 
adjusted slightly to account for these variables.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The databases we consulted are the following: The 
Commission's Universal Licensing System (``ULS''), International 
Bureau Filing System (``IBFS''), Consolidated Database System 
(``CDBS'') and Cable Operations and Licensing System (``COALS''). We 
also consulted reports generated within the Commission such as the 
Wireline Competition Bureau's Trends in Telephone Service and the 
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Numbering Resource Utilization 
Forecast and Annual CMRS Competition Report, as well as industry 
sources including, but not limited to, Television & Cable Factbook 
by Warren Publishing, Inc. and the Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook 
by Reed Elsevier, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. AM and FM Radio Stations
    4. As in previous years, we consider the additional factors of 
facility attributes and the population served by each radio station in 
determining regulatory fees for AM and FM radio stations. The 
calculation of the population served is determined by coupling current 
U.S. Census Bureau data with technical and engineering data, as 
detailed in Appendix D. Consequently, the population served, as well as 
the class and type of service (AM or FM), will continue to determine 
the amount of regulatory fee to be paid.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In addition, beginning in FY 2005, we established a 
procedure by which we set regulatory fees for AM and FM radio and 
VHF and UHF television Construction Permits each year at an amount 
no higher than the lowest regulatory fee for a licensed station in 
that respective service category. For example, in FY 2009 the 
regulatory fee for an AM radio station Construction Permit was no 
higher than the regulatory fee for an AM Class C radio station 
serving a population of less than 25,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Submarine Cable Methodology
    5. In its Second Report and Order (``Submarine Cable Order'') 
released on March 24, 2009, the Commission adopted a new submarine 
cable bearer circuit methodology that assessed regulatory fees on a per 
cable landing license basis, with higher fees for larger submarine 
cable systems and lower fees for smaller systems, without 
distinguishing between common

[[Page 21538]]

carriers and non-common carriers.\6\ For all other categories of 
international bearer circuits--common carrier and non-common carrier 
satellite facilities and common carrier terrestrial facilities--the 
Submarine Cable Order retained the existing regulatory fee methodology 
of assessing fees on a per 64 kbps circuit basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal 
Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4208, para. 1 (March 
24, 2009) (``Submarine Cable Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. In the Submarine Cable Order and in the FY 2009 Regulatory Fees 
Report and Order,\7\ the Commission allocated the total FY 2009 bearer 
circuit expected revenue into two revenue components: A submarine cable 
revenue component (87.6 percent) and a satellite/terrestrial revenue 
component (12.4 percent) using the Consensus Proposal allocation 
adopted by the Commission in the Submarine Cable Order.\8\ According to 
the Consensus Proposal, this allocation of 87.6 percent (submarine 
cable) and 12.4 percent (satellite/terrestrial) was calculated by 
determining the revenue obligations of submarine cable systems with the 
revenue obligations of the satellite and terrestrial facilities using 
the FY 2008 revenue requirement as its basis.\9\ Since we do not have 
any additional information that would lead us to change this allocation 
percentage for FY 2010, we propose to continue to use the allocation 
percentages of 87.6 percent (submarine cable) and 12.4 percent 
(satellite and terrestrial) for calculating FY 2010 submarine cable 
regulatory fees. Consistent with the Commission's annual process of 
updating its schedule of regulatory fees with recent data, however, we 
reserve the right to re-examine the allocation percentages described 
above on an annual basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See FY 2009 Report and Order at Appendix B.
    \8\ See Submarine Cable Order at paragraphs 1 and 6.
    \9\ Id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Full Service Television 
Broadcasters

    7. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, we stated that, beginning in FY 
2010, we plan to collect regulatory fees from digital broadcasters, and 
we sought comment on this plan to collect regulatory fees on full-power 
digital broadcast stations beginning with FY 2010, i.e., the fiscal 
year after the nation-wide transition date on June 12, 2009.\10\ Since 
the digital transition on June 12, 2009 has eliminated the distinction 
between digital and analog full-service television stations, the 
digital-only exemption will no longer apply beginning in FY 2010. 
Beginning in FY 2010, we will collect annual regulatory fees from all 
digital full-service television stations, and the ``digital-only'' 
exemption will no longer be applicable. Also, because this is the first 
year following the Commission's transition to digital full service 
television, it is possible that some facilities may be operating under 
a Special Temporary Authority (STA) beginning on October 1, 2009 until 
the digital license is issued. For FY 2010 regulatory fee purposes, 
these facilities operating under an STA will be considered to be fully 
operational licensed facilities and will be obligated to pay the same 
regulatory fee as a licensed full-service television station.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id. at para. 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Regulatory Fee Obligations for Digital Low Power, Class A, and TV 
Translators/Boosters

    8. Although the digital transition of full-service television 
stations was completed on June 12, 2009, the digital transition for Low 
Power, Class A, and TV Translators/Boosters is still voluntary, and 
there is currently no set date for the completion of this transition. 
Historically, the discussion of digital transition conversion with 
respect to regulatory fees has applied only to full-service television 
stations, and therefore, the elimination of the ``digital only'' 
exemption described in the above paragraph has no impact on this class 
of regulatees. Because the digital transition in the Low Power, Class 
A, and TV Translators/Booster facilities is voluntary and the 
transition will occur over a period time, it is possible that some 
facilities will convert from analog to digital more quickly than 
others. During this interim transition period, licensees of Low Power, 
Class A, and TV Translator/Booster facilities could be operating in 
analog mode, in digital mode, or in an analog and digital simulcast 
mode. For regulatory fee purposes, a fee will be assessed for each 
facility operating either in an analog or digital mode. In instances in 
which a licensee is operating in both an analog and digital mode as a 
simulcast, a single regulatory fee will be assessed for this analog 
facility that has a digital companion channel. As greater numbers of 
facilities convert to digital mode, the Commission will provide revised 
instructions on how regulatory fees will be assessed.

D. Commercial Mobile Radio Service Messaging Service

    9. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (``CMRS'') Messaging Service, 
which replaced the CMRS One-Way Paging fee category in 1997, includes 
all narrowband services.\11\ Since 1997, the number of subscribers has 
declined from 40.8 million to 6.5 million, and there does not appear to 
be any sign of recovery to the subscriber levels of 1997-1999. 
Maintaining the fee at the existing level of $.08 per subscriber is the 
minimum reasonable and appropriate action to take under the prevailing 
circumstances in the paging industry. We propose in FY 2010 to continue 
maintaining the regulatory fee rate at $0.08 per subscriber due to the 
declining subscriber base in this industry.\12\ We seek comment on this 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal 
Year 1997, MD Docket No. 96-186, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17161, 
17184-85, para. 60 (1997) (``FY 1997 Report and Order'').
    \12\ Between FY 1997 and FY 2009, the subscriber base in the 
paging industry declined 84 percent from 40.8 million to 6.5 million 
subscribers, according to FY 2009 collections data as of September 
30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Administrative and Operational Issues

    10. In FY 2009, the Commission implemented several changes in 
procedures which simplified the payment and reconciliation processes of 
FY 2009 regulatory fees. These changes proved to be very helpful to 
both licensees and to the Commission, and we propose in the following 
paragraphs to expand upon these improvements. In FY 2010, the 
Commission will promote greater use of technology (and less use of 
paper) to improve the regulatory fee notification and collection 
process. We seek general comment on ways to promote greater use of 
technology in collecting regulatory fees.
1. Mandatory Use of Fee Filer
    11. In FY 2009, we instituted a mandatory filing requirement using 
the Commission's electronic filing and payment system (also known as 
``Fee Filer'').\13\ Licensees filing their annual regulatory fee 
payments were required to begin the process by entering the 
Commission's Fee Filer system with a valid FRN and password. This 
change was beneficial to both licensees and to the Commission. For 
example, for licensees, the mandatory use of Fee Filer eliminated the 
need to manually complete and submit a hardcopy Form 159, and for the 
Commission, the data in electronic format made it much easier to 
process payments more efficiently and effectively. Because of the 
success of this process change, we propose to continue to make the use 
of Fee Filer for filing annual regulatory fees mandatory. We seek 
comment on this proposal. As

[[Page 21539]]

in FY 2009, the mandatory use of Fee Filer does not mean that licensees 
are expected to pay only through Fee Filer--it is only mandatory for 
licensees to begin the process of filing their annual regulatory fees 
using Fee Filer. This is one reason it is very important for licensees 
to have a current and valid FRN address on file in the Commission's 
Registration System (CORES). Going forward, only Form 159-E documents 
generated from Fee Filer will be permitted when sending in a regulatory 
fee payment to U.S. Bank. These Form 159-E's not only will reduce 
errors resulting from illegible handwriting on hardcopy Form 159's, 
but, because they are generated from Fee Filer, these forms also will 
create an electronic record of licensee payment attributes that are 
more easily tracked and searched than hardcopy Form 159's that are 
completed manually and mailed to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 20 and 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Notification and Collection of Regulatory Fees
a. Pre-bills
    12. In prior years, the Commission mailed pre-bills via surface 
mail to licensees in select regulatory fee categories: Interstate 
telecommunications service providers (``ITSPs''), Geostationary 
(``GSO'') and Non-Geostationary (``NGSO'') satellite space station 
licensees,\14\ holders of Cable Television Relay Service (``CARS'') 
licenses, and Earth Station licensees.\15\ The remaining regulatees did 
not receive pre-bills. In our FY 2009 Report and Order, the Commission 
decided to have the attributes of these pre-bills viewed in Fee Filer, 
rather than mailing pre-bills out to licensees via surface mail.\16\ 
Although the overall response to this procedural change was positive, 
it was apparent that a greater effort should have been made to inform 
licensees that they would not be receiving a hardcopy regulatory fee 
bill in the mail. In FY 2010, the Commission will continue to reduce 
its use of hardcopy documents by not mailing out annual regulatory fee 
bills, but the Commission is seeking to increase its efforts in 
notifying licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be 
mailed out. We seek comment on how to most efficiently and effectively 
notify licensees that hardcopy regulatory fee bills will not be mailed 
out, but that, instead, the amount and attributes of the bills will be 
available in Fee Filer for review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Geostationary orbit space station (``GSO'') licensees 
received regulatory fee pre-bills for satellites that (1) were 
licensed by the Commission and operational on or before October 1 of 
the respective fiscal year; and (2) were not co-located with and 
technically identical to another operational satellite on that date 
(i.e., were not functioning as a spare satellite). Non-geostationary 
orbit space station (``NGSO'') licensees received regulatory fee 
pre-bills for systems that were licensed by the Commission and 
operational on or before October 1 of the respective fiscal year.
    \15\ An assessment is a proposed statement of the amount of 
regulatory fees owed by an entity to the Commission (or proposed 
subscriber count to be ascribed for purposes of setting the entity's 
regulatory fee) but it is not entered into the Commission's 
accounting system as a current debt. A pre-bill is considered an 
account receivable in the Commission's accounting system. Pre-bills 
reflect the amount owed and have a payment due date of the last day 
of the regulatory fee payment window. Consequently, if a pre-bill is 
not paid by the due date, it becomes delinquent and is subject to 
our debt collection procedures. See also 47 CFR 1.1161(c), 
1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
    \16\ See FY 2009 Report and Order at paragraphs 24, 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Procedural Matters

    13. Included below are procedural items as well as our current 
payment and collection methods, which we have revised over the past 
several years to expedite the processing of regulatory fee payments. We 
include these payments and collection procedures here as a useful way 
of reminding regulatory fee payers and the public about these aspects 
of the annual regulatory fee collection process.

A. Public Notices and Fact Sheets

    14. Each year we post public notices and fact sheets pertaining to 
regulatory fees on our Web site. These documents contain information 
about the payment due date and the regulatory fee payment procedures. 
We will continue to post this information on https://www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html, but as in previous years we will not send out public 
notices and fact sheets to regulatees en masse.

B. Assessment Notifications

1. Media Services Licensees
    15. Beginning in FY 2003, we sent fee assessment notifications via 
surface mail to media services entities on a per-facility basis.\17\ 
The notifications provided the assessed fee amount for the facility in 
question, as well as the data attributes that determined the fee 
amount. We have since refined this initiative with improved 
results.\18\ Consistent with procedures used last year, we will mail 
out media assessment notifications to licensees in FY 2010 at their 
primary record of contact populated in our Consolidated Database System 
(``CDBS''), and to a secondary record of contact, if available.\19\ 
However, after FY 2010, as part of the Commission's initiative to 
emphasize electronic filing and reduce paper usage, the Commission will 
stop mailing out media notification assessments to media licensees. 
Instead the Commission will rely more on its various Web sites, 
including the Commission-authorized Web site at https://www.fccfees.com, 
to notify licensees of pending annual regulatory fees and to update or 
correct any information regarding their facilities and their fee-exempt 
status.\20\ We seek comment on our proposal to discontinue sending out 
media notification letters after the FY 2010 regulatory fee season.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ As stated previously at footnote 41, an assessment is a 
proposed statement of the amount of regulatory fees owed by an 
entity to the Commission (or proposed subscriber count to be 
ascribed for purposes of setting the entity's regulatory fee) but it 
is not entered into the Commission's accounting system as a current 
debt.
    \18\ Some of those refinements have been to provide licensees 
with a Commission-authorized Web site to update or correct any 
information concerning their facilities, and to amend their fee-
exempt status, if need be. Also, our notifications now provide 
licensees with a telephone number to call in the event that they 
need customer assistance. The notifications themselves have been 
refined so that licensees of fewer than four facilities receive 
individual fee assessment postcards for their facilities; whereas 
licensees of four or more facilities now receive a single assessment 
letter that lists all of their facilities and the associated 
regulatory fee obligation for each facility.
    \19\ We will issue fee assessments for AM and FM Radio Stations, 
AM and FM Construction Permits, FM Translators/Boosters, VHF and UHF 
Television Stations, VHF and UHF Television Construction Permits, 
Satellite Television Stations, Low Power Television (``LPTV'') 
Stations and LPTV Translators/Boosters, to the extent that 
applicants, permittees and licensees of such facilities do not 
qualify as government entities or non-profit entities. As in prior 
years, fee assessments will not be issued for broadcast auxiliary 
stations.
    \20\ If there is a change of address for the facility, it is the 
licensee's responsibility to make the address change in the Media 
Bureau's CDBS system, as well as in the Commission's Registration 
System (``CORES''). There is also a Commission-authorized Web site 
that media services licensees can use to view and update their 
exempt status (https://www.fccfees.com).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. The decision to discontinue mailing media notifications 
beginning in FY 2011 is consistent with the Commission's effort to 
become more electronic and less paper-oriented. However, the Commission 
understands that not all media licensees are able to access the 
Commission's various electronic Web sites once the hardcopy 
notification letters are discontinued in FY 2011. Therefore, to be 
receptive to the needs of these licensees, the Commission will leave 
the comment and reply comment period open until September 30, 2010 on 
the specific issue of whether the media notification letters should be 
discontinued in FY 2011. Because this decision does not impact FY 2010 
regulatory fees, we will be addressing this issue in the Commission's 
FY 2011 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking after we have had the chance to 
review the various

[[Page 21540]]

comments and reply comments that have been submitted. In addition to 
raising this issue in this document, the Commission will also remind 
media licensees of this proposed change in notification procedures when 
it sends out letters to media licensees later in the fiscal year 
regarding their FY 2010 regulatory fee obligations. To ensure that the 
comments of all potentially affected persons are properly included in 
the record, media licensees should submit their comments and reply 
comments on this issue as follows:
     Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically 
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
     Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must 
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one 
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, 
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or 
rulemaking number.
     Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or 
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must 
be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, 
Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with 
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before 
entering the building.
     Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service 
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton 
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
     U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority 
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
    17. Although the Commission will mail media assessment 
notifications to licensees in FY 2010, all licensees (including media 
services) will be required to use Fee Filer as the first step in paying 
their regulatory fee obligations. The notification assessments provide 
licensees with the same media data attributes found on Fee Filer; 
however, receiving this information in FY 2010 via mail notification 
does not obviate, nor should it be considered a substitute for, using 
Fee Filer as the first step in filing and paying annual regulatory 
fees. As explained previously, licensees must first log onto the 
Commission's Fee Filer system to begin the process of filing and paying 
their regulatory fees, but once in Fee Filer, licensees may pay by 
check or money order, credit card, or wire transfer. A Form 159-E 
generated from Fee Filer is required, even when mailing in the annual 
regulatory fee payment.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments
    18. As we have done in prior years, we will mail an initial 
assessment letter to Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers 
using data from the Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast (``NRUF'') 
report that is based on ``assigned'' number counts that have been 
adjusted for porting to net Type 0 ports (``in'' and ``out'').\21\ The 
letter will include a listing of the carrier's Operating Company 
Numbers (``OCNs'') upon which the assessment is based.\22\ The letters 
will not include OCNs with their respective assigned number counts, but 
rather, an aggregate total of assigned numbers for each carrier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal 
Year 2005 and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for 
Fiscal Year 2004, MD Docket Nos. 05-59 and 04-73, Report and Order 
and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 12259, 12264, paragraphs 
38-44 (2005).
    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19. If the carrier does not agree with the number of subscribers 
listed on the initial assessment letter, providers will have an 
opportunity within a specific timeframe to revise their subscriber 
counts by submitting supporting documentation to substantiate the 
change. However, instead of mailing the revised figures, providers will 
be asked to access Fee Filer and follow the instructions provided in 
order to submit their revised subscriber count along with any 
supporting documentation.\23\ The Commission will then review the 
revised count and supporting documentation and either approve or 
disapprove the submission in Fee Filer. The provider will be able to 
review the decision online in Fee Filer. If the submission is 
disapproved, the Commission will also attempt to contact the provider 
so that the provider will have an opportunity to discuss its revised 
subscriber count and/or provide additional supporting documentation. If 
we receive no response or correction to the initial assessment letter, 
or we do not reverse the disapproval of the provider's revised count 
submission, we will expect the fee payment to be based on the number of 
subscribers listed on the initial assessment. Once the timeframe for 
revision has passed, the subscriber counts will be finalized. These 
subscriber counts will then be the basis upon which CMRS regulatory 
fees will be expected. Providers will be able to view their final 
subscriber counts online in Fee Filer. A final CMRS assessment letter 
will not be mailed out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ In the supporting documentation, the provider will need to 
state a reason for the change, such as a purchase or sale of a 
subsidiary, the date of the transaction, and any other pertinent 
information that will help to justify a reason for the change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. Because some carriers do not file the NRUF report, they may not 
receive an initial letter of assessment. In these instances, the 
carriers should compute their fee payment using the standard 
methodology \24\ that is currently in place for CMRS Wireless services 
(e.g., compute their subscriber counts as of December 31, 2009), and 
submit their fee payment accordingly. Whether a carrier receives an 
assessment letter or not, the Commission reserves the right to audit 
the number of subscribers for which regulatory fees are paid. In the 
event that the Commission determines that the number of subscribers 
paid is inaccurate, the Commission will bill the carrier for the 
difference between what was paid and what should have been paid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory 
Fees Fact Sheet: What You Owe--Commercial Wireless Services for FY 
2009 at 1 (rel. September 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Streamlined Regulatory Fee Payment Process

1. Cable Television Subscribers
    21. We will continue to permit cable television operators to base 
their regulatory fee payment on their company's aggregate year-end 
subscriber count, rather than requiring them to sub-report subscriber 
counts on a per community unit identifier (``CUID'') basis.
2. CMRS Cellular and Mobile Providers
    22. In FY 2006, we streamlined the CMRS payment process by 
eliminating the requirement for CMRS providers to identify their 
individual call signs when making their regulatory fee payment, instead 
allowing CMRS providers to pay their regulatory fees only at the 
aggregate subscriber level without having to identify their various 
call signs.\25\ We will continue this practice in FY 2010. In FY 2007, 
we consolidated the CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories into 
one fee category with a single fee code, thereby eliminating the 
requirement for CMRS providers to separate their subscriber counts into 
CMRS cellular and CMRS mobile fee categories during the regulatory fee 
payment process. This consolidation of fee categories enabled the 
Commission to process payments more quickly and accurately. For FY 
2010, we will continue this practice of combining the CMRS cellular and

[[Page 21541]]

CMRS mobile fee categories into one regulatory fee category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal 
Year 2006, MD Docket No. 06-68, Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 8092, 
8105, para. 48 (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (``ITSP'')
    23. In FY 2007, we adopted a proposal to round lines 14 (total 
subject revenues) and 16 (total regulatory fee owed) on FCC Form 159-W 
to the nearest dollar. This revision enabled the Commission to process 
the ITSP regulatory fee payments more quickly because rounding was 
performed in a consistent manner and eliminated processing issues that 
occurred in prior years. In FY 2010, we will continue rounding lines 14 
and 16 when calculating the FY 2010 ITSP fee obligation. In addition, 
as in FY 2009, we will continue the practice of not mailing out Form 
159-W via surface mail.

D. Payment of Regulatory Fees

1. Lock Box Bank
    24. All lock box payments to the Commission for FY 2010 will be 
processed by U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri, and payable to the FCC. 
During the regulatory fee season, for those licensees paying by check, 
money order, or by credit card using Form 159-E remittance advice, the 
fee payment and Form 159-E remittance advice should be mailed to the 
following address: Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees, 
P.O. Box 979084, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Additional payment options 
and instructions are posted at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/regfees.html.
2. Receiving Bank for Wire Payments
    25. The receiving bank for all wire payments is the Federal Reserve 
Bank, New York, New York (TREAS NYC). When making a wire transfer, 
regulatees must fax a copy of their Fee Filer generated Form 159-E to 
U.S. Bank, St. Louis, Missouri at (314) 418-4232 at least one hour 
before initiating the wire transfer (but on the same business day), so 
as to not delay crediting their account. Regulatees should discuss 
arrangements (including bank closing schedules) with their bankers 
several days before they plan to make the wire transfer to allow 
sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed before 
the deadline. Complete instructions for making wire payments are posted 
at https://www.fcc.gov/fees/wiretran.html.
3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees
    26. Regulatees whose total FY 2010 regulatory fee liability, 
including all categories of fees for which payment is due, is less than 
$10 are exempted from payment of FY 2010 regulatory fees.
4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates
    27. The Commission will accept fee payments made in advance of the 
window for the payment of regulatory fees. The responsibility for 
payment of fees by service category is as follows:
     Media Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for initial 
construction permits (including construction permits for digital 
television stations) that were granted on or before October 1, 2009 for 
AM/FM radio stations, analog VHF/UHF full service television stations, 
and satellite television stations. Regulatory fees must be paid for all 
broadcast facility licenses granted on or before October 1, 2009. In 
instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after 
October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of 
the permit or license as of the fee due date.
     Wireline (Common Carrier) Services: Regulatory fees must 
be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1, 
2009. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned 
after October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder 
of the permit or license as of the fee due date. We note that audio 
bridging service providers are included in this category.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Audio bridging services are toll teleconferencing services, 
and audio bridging service providers are required to contribute 
directly to the universal service fund based on revenues from these 
services. On June 30, 2008, the Commission released the InterCall 
Order, in which the Commission stated that InterCall, Inc. and all 
similarly situated audio bridging service providers are required to 
contribute directly to the universal service fund. See Request for 
Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service 
Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10731 (2008) 
(``InterCall Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Wireless Services: CMRS cellular, mobile, and messaging 
services (fees based on number of subscribers or telephone number 
count): Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were 
granted on or before October 1, 2009. The number of subscribers, units, 
or telephone numbers on December 31, 2009 will be used as the basis 
from which to calculate the fee payment. In instances where a permit or 
license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, 
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or 
license as of the fee due date.
     The first eleven regulatory fee categories in our Schedule 
of Regulatory Fees (see Appendix B) pay ``small multi-year wireless 
regulatory fees.'' Entities pay these regulatory fees in advance for 
the entire amount of their five-year or ten-year term of initial 
license, and only pay regulatory fees again when the license is renewed 
or a new license is obtained. We include these fee categories in our 
Schedule of Regulatory Fees to publicize our estimates of the number of 
``small multi-year wireless'' licenses that will be renewed or newly 
obtained in FY 2010.
     Multichannel Video Programming Distributor Services (cable 
television operators and CARS licensees): Regulatory fees must be paid 
for the number of basic cable television subscribers as of December 31, 
2009.\27\ Regulatory fees also must be paid for CARS licenses that were 
granted on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit or 
license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, 
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or 
license as of the fee due date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Cable television system operators should compute their 
basic subscribers as follows: Number of single family dwellings + 
number of individual households in multiple dwelling unit 
(apartments, condominiums, mobile home parks, etc.) paying at the 
basic subscriber rate + bulk rate customers + courtesy and free 
service. Note: Bulk-Rate Customers = Total annual bulk-rate charge 
divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. 
Operators may base their count on ``a typical day in the last full 
week'' of December 2009, rather than on a count as of December 31, 
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     International Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for 
earth stations, geostationary orbit space stations and non-
geostationary orbit satellite systems that were licensed and 
operational on or before October 1, 2009. In instances where a permit 
or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2009, 
responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or 
license as of the fee due date.
     International Services: Submarine Cable Systems: 
Regulatory fees for submarine cable systems are to be paid on a per 
cable landing license basis based on circuit capacity as of December 
31, 2009. In instances where a license is transferred or assigned after 
October 1, 2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of 
the license as of the fee due date.
     International Services: Terestrial and Satellite Services: 
Finally, regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be 
paid by facilities-based common carriers that have active (used or 
leased) international bearer circuits as of December 31, 2009 in any 
terrestrial or satellite transmission facility for the provision of 
service to an end user or resale carrier, which includes active 
circuits to themselves or to their affiliates. In addition, non-common 
carrier satellite operators must

[[Page 21542]]

pay a fee for each circuit sold or leased to any customer, including 
themselves or their affiliates, other than an international common 
carrier authorized by the Commission to provide U.S. international 
common carrier services. ``Active circuits'' for these purposes include 
backup and redundant circuits as of December 31, 2009. Whether circuits 
are used specifically for voice or data is not relevant for these 
purposes in determining that they are active circuits. In instances 
where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 
2009, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or 
license as of the fee due date.

E. Enforcement

    28. To be considered timely, regulatory fee payments must be 
received and stamped at the lockbox bank by the last day of the 
regulatory fee filing window. Section 9(c) of the Act requires us to 
impose an additional charge as a penalty for late payment of any 
regulatory fee.\28\ A late payment penalty of 25 percent of the unpaid 
amount of the required regulatory fee will be assessed on the first day 
following the deadline date for filing of these fees. Failure to pay 
regulatory fees and/or any late penalty will subject regulatees to 
sanctions, including those set forth in section 1.1910 of the 
Commission's rules \29\ and in the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 
1996 (``DCIA'').\30\ We also assess administrative processing charges 
on delinquent debts to recover additional costs incurred in processing 
and handling the related debt pursuant to the DCIA and section 
1.1940(d) of the Commission's rules.\31\ These administrative 
processing charges will be assessed on any delinquent regulatory fee, 
in addition to the 25 percent late charge penalty. In case of partial 
payments (underpayments) of regulatory fees, the licensee will be given 
credit for the amount paid, but if it is later determined that the fee 
paid is incorrect or not timely paid, then the 25 percent late charge 
penalty (and other charges and/or sanctions, as appropriate) will be 
assessed on the portion that is not paid in a timely manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 47 U.S.C. 159(c).
    \29\ See 47 CFR 1.1910.
    \30\ Delinquent debt owed to the Commission triggers application 
of the ``red light rule'' which requires offsets or holds on pending 
disbursements. 47 CFR 1.1910. In 2004, the Commission adopted rules 
implementing the requirements of the DCIA. See Amendment of Parts 0 
and 1 of the Commission's Rules, MD Docket No. 02-339, Report and 
Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6540 (2004); 47 CFR part 1, subpart O, Collection 
of Claims Owed the United States.
    \31\ 47 CFR 1.1940(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    29. We will withhold action on any applications or other requests 
for benefits filed by anyone who is delinquent in any non-tax debts 
owed to the Commission (including regulatory fees) and will ultimately 
dismiss those applications or other requests if payment of the 
delinquent debt or other satisfactory arrangement for payment is not 
made.\32\ Failure to pay regulatory fees can also result in the 
initiation of a proceeding to revoke any and all authorizations held by 
the entity responsible for paying the delinquent fee(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See 47 CFR 1.1161(c), 1.1164(f)(5), and 1.1910.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    30. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (``IRFA'') is 
contained in Appendix E. Comments to the IRFA must be identified as 
responses to the IRFA and filed by the deadlines for comments on the 
Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Notice, including the 
IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration.

G. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis

    31. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not contain proposed 
information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (``PRA''), Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it 
does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for 
small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the 
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 
U.S.C. 3506 (c) (4). Completion of the 159 family of forms required by 
the Commission's regulatory fee payment process is already approved by 
the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060-
0589 and 3060-0949.

H. Congressional Review Act Analysis

    32. The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking to Congress and the Government Accountability Office 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Congressional Review Act is 
contained in Title II, 251, of the CWAAA; see Public Law 104-121, 
Title II, 251, 110 Stat. 868.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Ex Parte Rules

    33. This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the 
requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.\34\ Ex 
parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with 
Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when 
presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons 
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum 
summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of 
the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. 
More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments 
presented is generally required.\35\ Additional rules pertaining to 
oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See 47 CFR 1.1206(b); see also 47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1203.
    \35\ See 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Filing Requirements

    34. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of 
the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may 
file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on 
the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The 
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal 
Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See 
Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 
(1998).
    35. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using 
the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/or 
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
    36. Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an 
original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or 
rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers 
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or 
rulemaking number.
     Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or 
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must 
be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, 
Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with 
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before 
entering the building.
     Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service 
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton 
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
     U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority 
mail must be

[[Page 21543]]

addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
    People With Disabilities: To request materials in accessible 
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic 
files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).
    37. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex 
parte submissions will be available for public inspection during 
regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal 
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington, 
DC 20554. These documents will also be available free online, via ECFS. 
Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word, and/or Adobe 
Acrobat.
    38. Accessibility Information. To request information in accessible 
formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and 
Braille), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's 
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), 
(202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document can also be downloaded in Word and 
Portable Document Format (``PDF'') at: https://www.fcc.gov.
    III. Ordering Clauses
    39. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 
(j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 
U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking is hereby adopted.
    40. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a 
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in Appendix E, to the Chief Counsel for 
Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P

[[Page 21544]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.000


[[Page 21545]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.001


[[Page 21546]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.002


[[Page 21547]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.003


[[Page 21548]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.004


[[Page 21549]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26AP10.005

BILLING CODE 6712-01-C?>

[[Page 21550]]

Appendix C

Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2010

    In order to calculate individual service fees for FY 2010, we 
adjusted FY 2009 payment units for each service to more accurately 
reflect expected FY 2010 payment liabilities. We obtained our 
updated estimates through a variety of means. For example, we used 
Commission licensee data bases, actual prior year payment records 
and industry and trade association projections when available. The 
databases we consulted include our Universal Licensing System 
(``ULS''), International Bureau Filing System (``IBFS''), 
Consolidated Database System (``CDBS'') and Cable Operations and 
Licensing System (``COALS''), as well as reports generated within 
the Commission such as the Wireline Competition Bureau's Trends in 
Telephone Service and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's 
Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast.
    We sought verification for these estimates from multiple sources 
and, in all cases we compared FY 2010 estimates with actual FY 2009 
payment units to ensure that our revised estimates were reasonable. 
Where appropriate, we adjusted and/or rounded our final estimates to 
take into consideration the fact that certain variables that impact 
on the number of payment units cannot yet be estimated with 
sufficient accuracy. These include an unknown number of waivers and/
or exemptions that may occur in FY 2010 and the fact that, in many 
services, the number of actual licensees or station operators 
fluctuates from time to time due to economic, technical, or other 
reasons. When we note, for example, that our estimated FY 2010 
payment units are based on FY 2009 actual payment units, it does not 
necessarily mean that our FY 2010 projection is exactly the same 
number as FY 2009. We have either rounded the FY 2010 number or 
adjusted it slightly to account for these variables.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Fee category              Sources of payment unit estimates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Mobile (All), Microwave,  Based on Wireless Telecommunications
 218-219 MHz, Marine (Ship &    Bureau (``WTB'') projections of new
 Coast), Aviation (Aircraft &   applications and renewals taking into
 Ground), GMRS, Amateur         consideration existing Commission
 Vanity Call Signs, Domestic    licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft)
 Public Fixed.                  and Marine (Ship) estimates have been
                                adjusted to take into consideration the
                                licensing of portions of these services
                                on a voluntary basis.
CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services  Based on WTB projection reports, and FY
                                09 payment data.
CMRS Messaging Services......  Based on WTB reports, and FY 09 payment
                                data.
AM/FM Radio Stations.........  Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
                                exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
                                units.
UHF/VHF Television Stations..  Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
                                exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
                                units.
AM/FM/TV Construction Permits  Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
                                exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
                                units.
LPTV, Translators and          Based on CDBS data, adjusted for
 Boosters, Class A Television.  exemptions, and actual FY 2009 payment
                                units.
Broadcast Auxiliaries........  Based on actual FY 2009 payment units.
BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS)......  Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2009
                                payment units.
LMDS.........................  Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2009
                                payment units.
Cable Television Relay         Based on data from Media Bureau's COALS
 Service (``CARS'') Stations.   data base and actual FY 2009 payment
                                units.
Cable Television System        Based on publicly available data sources
 Subscribers.                   for estimated subscriber counts and
                                actual FY 2009 payment units.
Interstate Telecommunication   Based on FCC Form 499-Q data for the four
 Service Providers.             quarters of calendar year 2009, the
                                Wireline Competition Bureau projected
                                the amount of calendar year 2009 revenue
                                that will be reported on 2010 FCC Form
                                499-A worksheets in April 2010.
Earth Stations...............  Based on International Bureau (``IB'')
                                licensing data and actual FY 2009
                                payment units.
Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs)  Based on IB data reports and actual FY
                                2009 payment units.
International Bearer Circuits  Based on IB reports and submissions by
                                licensees.
Submarine Cable Licenses.....  Based on IB license information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Appendix D

Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Go Into Determining 
Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages

AM Stations

    For stations with nondirectional daytime antennas, the 
theoretical radiation was used at all azimuths. For stations with 
directional daytime antennas, specific information on each day 
tower, including field ratio, phasing, spacing and orientation was 
retrieved, as well as the theoretical pattern root-mean-square of 
the radiation in all directions in the horizontal plane (``RMS'') 
figure milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @ 1 km) for the antenna system. 
The standard, or modified standard if pertinent, horizontal plane 
radiation pattern was calculated using techniques and methods 
specified in 73.150 and 73.152 of the Commission's rules.\1\ 
Radiation values were calculated for each of 360 radials around the 
transmitter site. Next, estimated soil conductivity data was 
retrieved from a database representing the information in FCC Figure 
R3.\2\ Using the calculated horizontal radiation values, and the 
retrieved soil conductivity data, the distance to the principal 
community (5 mV/m) contour was predicted for each of the 360 
radials. The resulting distance to principal community contours were 
used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was 
accomplished by determining which 2,000 block centroids were 
contained in the polygon. (A block centroid is the center point of a 
small area containing population as computed by the U.S. Census 
Bureau.) The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks 
represents the total population for the predicted principal 
community coverage area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 47 CFR 73.150 and 73.152.
    \2\ See Map of Estimated Effective Ground Conductivity in the 
United States, 47 CFR 73.190 Figure R3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FM Stations

    The greater of the horizontal or vertical effective radiated 
power (``ERP'') (kW) and respective height above average terrain 
(``HAAT'') (m) combination was used. Where the antenna height above 
mean sea level (``HAMSL'') was available, it was used in lieu of the 
average HAAT figure to calculate specific HAAT figures for each of 
360 radials under study. Any available directional pattern 
information was applied as well, to produce a radial-specific ERP 
figure. The HAAT and ERP figures were used in conjunction with the 
Field Strength (50-50) propagation curves specified in 47 CFR 73.313 
of the Commission's rules to predict the distance to the principal 
community (70 dBu (decibel above 1 microVolt per meter) or 3.17 mV/
m) contour for each of the 360 radials.\3\ The resulting distance to 
principal community contours were used to form a geographical 
polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which 
2,000 block centroids were contained in the polygon. The sum of the 
population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total 
population for the predicted principal community coverage area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 47 CFR 73.313.


[[Page 21551]]


---------------------------------------------------
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.