Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; VIMPAT-NDA 22-254, 21299-21300 [2010-9509]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket numbers found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
Comments and petitions may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–9512 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2009–E–0175 and FDA–
2009–E–0173]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; VIMPAT—NDA 22–254
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
VIMPAT based on new drug application
(NDA) 22–254 for VIMPAT injection
and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of applications to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of patents which claim the
human drug product, VIMPAT. The
regulatory review period determination
for VIMPAT Tablets is publishing in
this issue of the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 0993–0002,
301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product VIMPAT
(lacosamide). VIMPAT injection is
indicated as adjunctive therapy in the
treatment of partial-onset seizures in
patients with epilepsy aged 17 years and
older when oral administration is
temporarily not feasible. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received patent term restoration
applications for VIMPAT (U.S. Patent
Nos. 5,654,301 and RE38,551) from
Research Corporation Technologies,
Inc., and the Patent and Trademark
Office requested FDA’s assistance in
determining the patents’ eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
September 29, 2009, FDA advised the
Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of VIMPAT represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
VIMPAT is 3,452 days. Of this time,
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21299
3,055 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while, 397 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: May 19, 1999.
The applicant claims November 14,
2003, as the date an investigational new
drug application (IND) became effective.
However, according to FDA records, this
IND was not the first IND received for
this active ingredient. In general, FDA
has used the first IND of the active
ingredient of the drug product as the
beginning of the testing phase, if
information derived from this first IND
was or could have been relied on or was
relevant for approval to market the drug
product. FDA records indicate that the
effective date of the first IND for
lacosamide was May 19, 1999, which
was 30 days after FDA receipt of this
first IND. This is the same IND and the
same date FDA determined was the
beginning of the regulatory review
period for Vimpat Tablets approved
under new drug application (NDA) 22–
253. The regulatory review period
determination for VIMPAT Tablets is
publishing in this issue of the Federal
Register.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: September 28, 2007.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA)
22–254 for VIMPAT injection was
submitted on September 28, 2007.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 28, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–254 was approved on October 28,
2008.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,104 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 22, 2010.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 20, 2010. To meet its burden,
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
21300
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket numbers found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–9509 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0159]
North American Bioproducts Corp.;
Filing of Food Additive Petition
(Animal Use); Erythromycin
Thiocyanate
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that North American Bioproducts Corp.
has filed a petition proposing that the
food additive regulations be amended to
provide for the safe use of erythromycin
thiocyanate as an antimicrobial
processing aid in fuel-ethanol
fermentations with respect to its
consequent presence in by-product
distiller grains used as an animal feed
or feed ingredient.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the petitioner’s
environmental assessment May 24,
2010.
You may submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Isabel W. Pocurull, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–453–6853,
email: isabel.pocurull@fda.hhs.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)),
notice is given that a food additive
petition (FAP 2263) has been filed by
North American Bioproducts Corp.,
Corporate Support Center, 1815 Satellite
Blvd., Building 200, Duluth, GA 30097.
The petition proposes to amend the food
additive regulations in 21 CFR Part 573
Food Additives Permitted in Feed and
Drinking Water of Animals to provide
for the safe use of erythromycin
thiocyanate as an antimicrobial
processing aid in fuel-ethanol
fermentations with respect to its
consequent presence in by-product
distiller grains used as an animal feed
or feed ingredient.
The potential environmental impact
of this action is being reviewed. To
encourage public participation
consistent with regulations issued under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(40 CFR 1501.4(b)), the agency is
placing the environmental assessment
submitted with the petition that is the
subject of this notice on public display
at the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) for public review and
comment.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
FDA will also place on public display
any amendments to, or comments on,
the petitioner’s environmental
assessment without further
announcement in the Federal Register.
If, based on its review, the agency finds
that an environmental impact statement
is not required and this petition results
in a regulation, the notice of availability
of the agency’s finding of no significant
impact and the evidence supporting that
finding will be published with the
regulation in the Federal Register in
accordance with 21 CFR 25.51(b).
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2010–9420 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Funding
Opportunity
AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent to award a
Single Source Grant to the current
grantee for the National Center for Child
Traumatic Stress.
SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the
public that the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) intends to award
approximately $1,000,000 (total costs)
for up to one year to the current grantee
for the National Center for Child
Traumatic Stress (NCCTS). This is not a
formal request for applications.
Assistance will be provided only to the
current grantee for the National Center
for Child Traumatic Stress based on the
receipt of a satisfactory application that
is approved by an independent review
group.
Funding Opportunity Title: SM–10–
016.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 93.243.
Authority: Section 582 of the Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Justification: Only an application
from the current grantee for the National
Center for Child Traumatic Stress will
be considered for funding under this
announcement. One-year funding has
become available to assist SAMHSA in
responding to data analysis and
reporting activities that improve
evidence-based practices and raise the
standard of trauma care. It is considered
most cost-effective and efficient to
supplement the existing grantee because
they have access to the existing National
Child Traumatic Stress Network
(NCTSN) datasets and data analytic
expertise to conduct the required data
analytic activities. There is no other
potential organization with the required
access and expertise.
Eligibility for this program
supplement is restricted to the current
grantee, National Center for Child
Traumatic Stress in accordance with
Congressional intent for 2010 SAMHSA
appropriations.
The role of the NCCTS is to provide
infrastructure and support for the
National Child Traumatic Stress
Network to achieve its goals of
increasing access and raising the
standard of care for traumatized
children, adolescents, and their
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21299-21300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9509]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA-2009-E-0175 and FDA-2009-E-0173]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; VIMPAT--NDA 22-254
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for VIMPAT based on new drug application (NDA)
22-254 for VIMPAT injection and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of patents
which claim the human drug product, VIMPAT. The regulatory review
period determination for VIMPAT Tablets is publishing in this issue of
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 0993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product VIMPAT
(lacosamide). VIMPAT injection is indicated as adjunctive therapy in
the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy aged
17 years and older when oral administration is temporarily not
feasible. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office
received patent term restoration applications for VIMPAT (U.S. Patent
Nos. 5,654,301 and RE38,551) from Research Corporation Technologies,
Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in
determining the patents' eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated September 29, 2009, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of VIMPAT represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
VIMPAT is 3,452 days. Of this time, 3,055 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while, 397 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
May 19, 1999. The applicant claims November 14, 2003, as the date an
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
according to FDA records, this IND was not the first IND received for
this active ingredient. In general, FDA has used the first IND of the
active ingredient of the drug product as the beginning of the testing
phase, if information derived from this first IND was or could have
been relied on or was relevant for approval to market the drug product.
FDA records indicate that the effective date of the first IND for
lacosamide was May 19, 1999, which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
this first IND. This is the same IND and the same date FDA determined
was the beginning of the regulatory review period for Vimpat Tablets
approved under new drug application (NDA) 22-253. The regulatory review
period determination for VIMPAT Tablets is publishing in this issue of
the Federal Register.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: September 28,
2007. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) 22-254 for VIMPAT injection was submitted on
September 28, 2007.
3. The date the application was approved: October 28, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-254 was approved on October
28, 2008.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,104 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by June 22, 2010. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by October 20,
2010. To meet its burden,
[[Page 21300]]
the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-
42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket numbers found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-9509 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S