Special Local Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup, Detroit River, Detroit, MI, 21191-21194 [2010-9492]
Download as PDF
21191
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 78
Friday, April 23, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0238]
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
RIN 1625–AA08
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Special Local Regulation; Detroit
APBA Gold Cup, Detroit River, Detroit,
MI
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
7 CFR Part 4288
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
RIN 0570–AA75
ACTION:
Subpart B—Advanced Biofuel Payment
Program; Correction
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary special local
regulation in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone on the Detroit River,
Detroit, Michigan. This special local
regulation is intended to restrict vessels
from portions of the Detroit River during
the Detroit APBA Gold Cup. This
special local regulation is necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with powerboat
races.
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Proposed rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Agency published a
document in the Federal Register of
April 16, 2010 at 75 FR 20085 proposing
a payment program for producers of
advanced biofuels to supporting existing
advanced biofuel production and to
encourage new production of advanced
biofuels. As published, the proposed
rule indicates that public comments
must be received on or before May 17,
2010. This reflects a 30-day public
comment period, when a 60-day public
comment period was intended.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Diane Berger,
(202) 260–1508.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
In the Federal Register of April 16,
2010, in FR Doc. 2010–8278, on page
20085, column 2, under DATES, the third
line is corrected by changing ‘‘May 17,
2010’’ to ‘‘June 15, 2010.’’
Dated: April 19, 2010.
Judith A. Canales,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9345 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0238 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0238),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0238’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
21192
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
special local regulation around the
location of the race course will help
ensure the safety of persons and
property at these events and help
minimize the associated risks.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0238’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
This proposed temporary special local
regulation is necessary to ensure the
safety of spectators and vessels during
the setup, course familiarization, testing
and race in conjunction with the Detroit
APBA Gold Cup. The powerboat race
and associated testing will occur
between 7 a.m. on July 7, 2010 and 7
p.m. on July 11, 2010. The special local
regulation will be enforced daily from 7
a.m. to 7 p.m. on July 7–11, 2010.
The special local regulation will
encompass all waters of the Detroit
River, between Detroit, MI and Belle
Isle, within an area bound on the west
by a north south line created by the
Belle Isle Bridge, starting on land in
Detroit at position 42°20′07″ N;
083°00′00″ W and extending south to a
point on Belle Isle at position 42°20′04″
N; 082°59′08″ W, and bound on the east
by a north-south line starting on land in
Detroit at position 42°21′03″ N;
082°57′07″ W, and extending south to a
point on Belle Isle at position 42°21′00″
N; 082°57′07″ W. All geographic
coordinates are North American Datum
of 1983 [NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated on
scene patrol personnel. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
special local regulation area is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated on scene representative. The
Captain of the Port or his designated on
scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary special local
regulation is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and spectators from
hazards associated with a powerboat
race. The Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined powerboat races in close
proximity to watercraft and
infrastructure pose significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, powerboats traveling
at high speeds, and large numbers of
spectators in close proximity to the
water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
minimal adverse impact to mariners
from the zone’s activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Detroit River near
Detroit, MI between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
on July 7–11, 2010.
This special local regulation area will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: This rule will
only be enforced for twelve hours on
each day for five days total. In the event
that this temporary special local
regulation affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Detroit to transit
through the special local regulation
area. The Coast Guard will give notice
to the public via a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect
and when it is being enforced.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty
rights of Native American Tribes.
Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed
to working with Tribal Governments to
implement local policies and to mitigate
tribal concerns. We have determined
that this rule and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible.
We have also determined that this
proposed rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have
questions concerning the provisions of
this proposed rule or options for
compliance are encouraged to contact
the point of contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21193
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves the establishment of a special
local regulation. Based on our
preliminary determination, there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule
should be categorically excluded.
Because this event establishes a special
local regulation, paragraph (34)(h) of
figure 2–1 of the Instruction applies.
Thus, no further environmental
documentation is required. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a new temporary § 100.35T09–
0238 as follows:
§ 100.35T09–0238 Special Local
Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup; Detroit
River; Detroit, MI.
(a) Location. The following is a
temporary special local regulation area:
all waters of the Detroit River, between
Detroit, MI and Belle Isle, within an area
bound on the west by a north south line
created by the Belle Isle Bridge, starting
on land in Detroit at position 42°20′07″
N; 083°00′00″ W and extending south to
a point on Belle Isle at position
42°20′04″ N; 082°59′08″ W, and bound
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
21194
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
on the east by a north-south line starting
on land in Detroit at position 42°21′03″
N; 082°57′07″ W, and extending south to
a point on Belle Isle at position
42°21′00″ N; 082°57′07″ W. (DATUM:
NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is
effective from 7 a.m. on July 7, 2010, to
7 p.m. on July 11, 2010. This regulation
will be enforced daily from 7 a.m. until
7 p.m. on July 7–11, 2010.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 100.35 of this part, entry
into, and transiting or anchoring within
this special local regulation area is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This special local regulation area
is closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the Captain of the
Port Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the special local
regulation area shall contact the Captain
of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the special local
regulation area must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: April 8, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010–9492 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0279]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Harrison
Township Grand Prix, Lake St. Clair;
Harrison Township, MI
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary special local
regulation in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone on Lake St. Clair, Harrison
Township, Michigan. This special local
regulation is intended to restrict vessels
from portions of Lake St. Clair during
the Harrison Township Grand Prix. This
special local regulation is necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with powerboat
races.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0279 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0279),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0279’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0279’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21191-21194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9492]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0238]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup, Detroit River,
Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary special
local regulation in the Captain of the Port Detroit Zone on the Detroit
River, Detroit, Michigan. This special local regulation is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of the Detroit River during the Detroit
APBA Gold Cup. This special local regulation is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with powerboat
races.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0238 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention Department, Sector
Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0238), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0238'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to
[[Page 21192]]
know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0238'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary special local regulation is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a
powerboat race. The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined
powerboat races in close proximity to watercraft and infrastructure
pose significant risk to public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of recreation vessels, powerboats
traveling at high speeds, and large numbers of spectators in close
proximity to the water could easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities. Establishing a special local regulation around the location
of the race course will help ensure the safety of persons and property
at these events and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed temporary special local regulation is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the setup, course
familiarization, testing and race in conjunction with the Detroit APBA
Gold Cup. The powerboat race and associated testing will occur between
7 a.m. on July 7, 2010 and 7 p.m. on July 11, 2010. The special local
regulation will be enforced daily from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on July 7-11,
2010.
The special local regulation will encompass all waters of the
Detroit River, between Detroit, MI and Belle Isle, within an area bound
on the west by a north south line created by the Belle Isle Bridge,
starting on land in Detroit at position 42[deg]20'07'' N;
083[deg]00'00'' W and extending south to a point on Belle Isle at
position 42[deg]20'04'' N; 082[deg]59'08'' W, and bound on the east by
a north-south line starting on land in Detroit at position
42[deg]21'03'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W, and extending south to a point on
Belle Isle at position 42[deg]21'00'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W. All
geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 [NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol
personnel. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the special
local regulation area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Detroit or his designated on scene representative. The Captain
of the Port or his designated on scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects minimal adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Detroit River near Detroit, MI
between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on July 7-11, 2010.
This special local regulation area will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons: This rule will only be enforced for twelve hours on
each day for five days total. In the event that this temporary special
local regulation affects shipping, commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port Detroit to transit through the
special local regulation area. The Coast Guard will give notice to the
public via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect and when it is being enforced.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
[[Page 21193]]
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention
Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-
mail Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate tribal
concerns. We have determined that this rule and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible. We have also determined that this
proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Nevertheless, Indian
Tribes that have questions concerning the provisions of this proposed
rule or options for compliance are encouraged to contact the point of
contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a special local regulation. Based on our preliminary
determination, there are no factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule should be categorically excluded.
Because this event establishes a special local regulation, paragraph
(34)(h) of figure 2-1 of the Instruction applies. Thus, no further
environmental documentation is required. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a new temporary Sec. 100.35T09-0238 as follows:
Sec. 100.35T09-0238 Special Local Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup;
Detroit River; Detroit, MI.
(a) Location. The following is a temporary special local regulation
area: all waters of the Detroit River, between Detroit, MI and Belle
Isle, within an area bound on the west by a north south line created by
the Belle Isle Bridge, starting on land in Detroit at position
42[deg]20'07'' N; 083[deg]00'00'' W and extending south to a point on
Belle Isle at position 42[deg]20'04'' N; 082[deg]59'08'' W, and bound
[[Page 21194]]
on the east by a north-south line starting on land in Detroit at
position 42[deg]21'03'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W, and extending south to a
point on Belle Isle at position 42[deg]21'00'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W.
(DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 7 a.m. on
July 7, 2010, to 7 p.m. on July 11, 2010. This regulation will be
enforced daily from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. on July 7-11, 2010.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 100.35 of
this part, entry into, and transiting or anchoring within this special
local regulation area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This special local regulation area is closed to all vessel
traffic, except as may be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
special local regulation area shall contact the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so.
Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the special
local regulation area must comply with all directions given to them by
the Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative.
Dated: April 8, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010-9492 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P