Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Implementation Plan Revision; State of New Jersey, 21197-21207 [2010-9463]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the special local
regulation area shall contact the Captain
of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Vessel operators given permission to
enter or operate in the special local
regulation area must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: April 9, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010–9499 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
This
document proposes to take action on
SIP revisions pertaining to the State of
New Mexico. We have published a
direct final rule approving the State’s
SIP revisions in the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in
the preamble to the direct final rule.
If we receive no adverse comment, we
will not take further action on this
proposed rule. If we receive adverse
comment, we will withdraw the direct
final rule and it will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based upon
this proposed rule.
We do not intend to institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information, please see the information
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Dated: April 9, 2010.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR Part 52
[FR Doc. 2010–9365 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
[EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0990; FRL–9140–9]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Mexico; Revisions to New Mexico
Transportation Conformity Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
[EPA–R02–OAR–2010–0161, FRL–9141–5]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning
the State transportation conformity
rules. The plan revisions are intended to
ensure consistency with amendments to
the Federal Transportation Conformity
Rule. These plan revisions meet
statutory and regulatory requirements,
and are consistent with EPA’s guidance.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please see the related direct
final rule, which is located in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register, for detailed instructions on
how to submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone 214–665–8542; fax number
214–665–7263; e-mail address
riley.jeffrey@epa.gov.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
40 CFR Part 52
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Implementation
Plan Revision; State of New Jersey
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve a
request from the State of New Jersey to
revise its State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to incorporate amendments to
Subchapter 4 ‘‘Control and Prohibition
of Particles from Combustion of Fuel,’’
Subchapter 10 ‘‘Sulfur in Solid Fuels,’’
Subchapter 16 ‘‘Control and Prohibition
of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds,’’ Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control
and Prohibition of Air Pollution from
Oxides of Nitrogen,’’ and related
amendments to Subchapter 21
‘‘Emission Statements.’’ The
amendments relate to the control of
oxides of nitrogen (NOX), sulfur dioxide
(SO2), particles and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from stationary
sources. This proposed SIP revision
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21197
consists of control measures needed to
meet the State’s commitment to adopt
additional reasonably available control
technology (RACT) rules that address
RACT requirements for the 1997
national ambient air quality standards
for ozone. Additionally, the proposed
SIP revision includes control measures
that will help the State meet the
national ambient air quality standards
for fine particles.
The intended effect of this proposed
rule is to approve the State control
strategy, which will result in emission
reductions that will help achieve
attainment of the national ambient air
quality standards for ozone and fine
particles required by the Clean Air Act
(the Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
R02–OAR–2010–0161, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov.
• Fax: 212–637–3901.
• Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866.
• Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner,
Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2010–
0161. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
21198
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region II Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007–1866. EPA requests, if
at all possible, that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Truchan (truchan.paul@epa.gov)
concerning Subchapters 16 and 21,
Anthony (Ted) Gardella
(gardella.anthony@epa.gov) concerning
Subchapter 19, and Kenneth Fradkin
(fradkin.kenneth@epa.gov) concerning
Subchapters 4 and 10, at the Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866, (212) 637–4249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
detailed information on New Jersey’s
proposed SIP revision see the Technical
Support Document (TSD), prepared in
support of today’s action. The TSD can
be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov.
The following table of contents
describes the format of this rulemaking:
I. EPA’s Proposed Action
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
A. What Action Is EPA Proposing?
B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?
C. What Are the Clean Air Act
Requirements for RACT?
D. How Did New Jersey Address the RACT
Requirements for the 8-Hour Ozone
Standard?
E. When Were New Jersey’s RACT
Requirements Proposed and Adopted?
F. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 4—‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Particles From
Combustion of Fuel?’’
G. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 10—‘‘Sulfur in Solid
Fuels?’’
H. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 16: ‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile
Organic Compounds?’’
I. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New Jersey’s
Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control and Prohibition
of Air Pollution From Oxides of
Nitrogen?’’
J. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New Jersey’s
Subchapter 21—‘‘Emission Statements?’’
II. Conclusion
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. EPA’s Proposed Action
A. What Action Is EPA Proposing?
On April 21, 2009 New Jersey
submitted a proposed State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that
includes amendments to New Jersey
Administrative Code, Title 7: Chapter 27
(NJAC 7:27) Subchapter 4 ‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Particles from
Combustion of Fuel;’’ Subchapter 8
‘‘Permits and Certificates for Minor
Facilities (and Major Facilities Without
an Operating Permit);’’ Subchapter 10
‘‘Sulfur in Solid Fuels;’’ Subchapter 16
‘‘Control and Prohibition of Air
Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds;’’ Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control
and Prohibition of Air Pollution from
Oxides of Nitrogen;’’ and Subchapter 21
‘‘Emission Statements.’’
EPA proposes to approve the state
amendments to Subchapter 4 and
Subchapter 10 as revisions to the SIP.
These amendments relate to the control
of particle and sulfur dioxide emissions
and will help the State make advances
towards reducing regional haze and
meeting the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for fine particles.
EPA will review Subchapter 8 and
will address the approvability of all
Subchapter 8 amendments in a future
action.
EPA proposes to approve, as revisions
to the New Jersey ozone SIP, the stateadopted amendments to Subchapter 16
and Subchapter 19, and related
amendments to Subchapter 21, each
adopted by New Jersey on March 20,
2009, and submitted to EPA on April 21,
2009. New Jersey amended Subchapter
16 and Subchapter 19 to meet the State’s
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commitment to adopt additional RACT
rules for 12 of 13 source categories (see
74 FR 2945, January 16, 2009), which
will result in additional emission
reductions of NOX and VOCs. EPA
proposes that New Jersey’s stateadopted Subchapters 16 and 19, and the
related amendments to Subchapter 21,
are fully approvable as SIPstrengthening measures for New Jersey’s
ozone SIP. The amendments to
Subchapters 16, 19 and 21 in New
Jersey’s submittal meet the State’s
commitment to adopt additional RACT
control measures for 12 of 13 source
categories to achieve additional
emission reductions of NOX and VOCs
to attain the 8-hour ozone standard. The
one remaining source category,
adhesives and sealants, will be
addressed in a separate rulemaking.
B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?
EPA is proposing this action to:
• Give the public the opportunity to
submit comments on EPA’s proposed
action;
• Approve control measures which
reduce NOX and VOC emissions, a
precursor of ozone formation, to help
attain the NAAQS for ozone;
• Further New Jersey’s and EPA’s
RACT requirements under the Clean Air
Act (the Act); and
• Make New Jersey’s regulations for
additional emission reductions federally
enforceable and available for emission
reduction credit in the SIP.
• Approve control measures that
reduce particles, sulfur dioxide, and
NOX emissions, to help attain the
NAAQS for fine particles.
• Approve control measures that
reduce regional haze.
C. What Are the Clean Air Act
Requirements for RACT?
Sections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2) and
182(f) of the Act require nonattainment
areas that are designated as moderate or
above to adopt RACT. All of New Jersey
is subject to this requirement since all
counties in the State are located in
either of two nonattainment areas that
are classified as moderate ozone
nonattainment areas for the 8-hour
ozone standard (40 CFR 81.331). In
accordance with section 182(b), New
Jersey must, at a minimum, adopt RACT
level controls for sources covered by a
Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG)
document and for any major non-CTG
sources.
Section IV.G of EPA’s Phase 2
implementation rule (70 FR 71612,
November 29, 2005) (Phase 2 Rule)
discusses the RACT requirements for
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. It
states, in part, that where a RACT SIP
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
is required, SIPs implementing the 8hour ozone standard generally must
assure that RACT is met, either through
a certification that previously required
RACT controls represent RACT for 8hour ozone implementation purposes
or, where necessary, through a new
RACT determination. The majority of
counties in New Jersey were previously
classified under the 1-hour ozone
standard as severe, while the remaining
counties were subject to RACT as part
of the Ozone Transport Region. New
Jersey chose a uniform applicability
level for RACT based on the severe
classification which resulted in a
statewide requirement for major sources
of NOX and VOC to be defined as those
having emissions of 25 tons per year or
more of both VOC and/or NOX. Under
the 8-hour standard, areas classified as
moderate, the definition for major
source is 50 tons per year for VOC and
100 tons per year for NOX. However,
New Jersey’s choice to retain the
original 1-hour ozone limits statewide
in New Jersey for purposes of the RACT
analysis resulted in a more stringent
evaluation of RACT. New Jersey’s use of
25 tons per year for RACT is consistent
with the anti-backsliding requirement of
the Act. See Clean Air Act sections
110(l) and 193; and South Coast Air
Quality Management Dist (SCAQMD) v.
EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
D. How Did New Jersey Address the
RACT Requirements for the 8-Hour
Ozone Standard?
New Jersey submitted a RACT
assessment in an August 1, 2007
submission which was supplemented
on December 14, 2007. The RACT
submission from the State of New Jersey
consisted of: (1) A certification that
previously adopted RACT controls in
New Jersey’s SIP for 101 source
categories that were approved by EPA
under the 1-hour ozone standard are
based on the currently available
technically and economically feasible
controls, and that they continue to
represent RACT for 8-hour ozone
implementation purposes; (2) a
commitment to adopt new or more
stringent regulations that represent
RACT control levels for both specific
source categories and specific sources;
and (3) a negative declaration that for
certain Control Techniques Guidelines
and/or Alternative Control Techniques
(ACTs) documents there are no sources
within New Jersey or that there are no
sources above the applicable thresholds.
EPA reviewed the State’s RACT
analysis and agreed with the State’s
conclusions. On May 15, 2009 (74 FR
22837) EPA conditionally approved
New Jersey’s RACT SIP for the 8-hour
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
ozone standard conditioned on the
State’s meeting its commitment to
submit adopted RACT rules for 13
source categories by April 1, 2009. To
address this commitment, on March 20,
2009, New Jersey adopted the RACT
rules for the following 12 source
categories: Alternative and facilityspecific VOC and NOX emission limits;
emulsified and cutback asphalt used for
paving; asphalt pavement production
plants; CTGs published in 2006: flat
wood paneling, flexible packaging
printing materials, and offset
lithographic printing and letterpress
printing; coal-fired boilers serving
electric generating units (EGUs); oil and
gas-fired boilers serving EGUs; High
Electric Demand Day (HEDD) EGUs;
industrial/commercial/institutional
boilers and other indirect heat
exchangers; municipal solid waste
incinerators; glass manufacturing
furnaces; sewage sludge incinerators;
and VOC stationary storage tanks. The
industrial adhesives and sealants source
category (13th) was adopted on October
30, 2008 and submitted as a SIP revision
on April 9, 2009. EPA will propose
action on the adhesives and sealant rule
in a separate action.
E. When Were New Jersey’s RACT
Requirements Proposed and Adopted?
New Jersey proposed the RACT rules
at Subchapters 4, 10, 16 and 19, and
related amendments to Subchapter 21,
on August 4, 2008, accepted written
comments on them until October 3,
2008, and held public hearings on them
on September 26, 2008. New Jersey
adopted the amended RACT rules and
related requirements on March 20, 2009,
and submitted them to EPA for approval
as revisions to the SIP on April 21,
2009. On June 4, 2009, EPA determined
the submittal to be administratively and
technically complete.
F. What is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 4—‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Particles From
Combustion of Fuel?’’
New Jersey previously submitted
Subchapter 4 (state effective date
October 12, 1977) as a SIP revision and
EPA approved it on January 27, 1984 (49
FR 3465). In this action, EPA is acting
on the April 21, 2009 submittal of
amendments to Subchapter 4 that affect
the coal-fired boiler source category,
which consist of new definitions and
more stringent emission limits for
facilities that emit particles from coalfired boilers.
Section 4.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 4.1,
Definitions, to add and/or revise terms
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21199
and their definitions. EPA evaluated
New Jersey’s definitions for consistency
with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA
policy, and proposes to approve them.
Section 4.2 Standards for the Emission
of Particles
New Jersey amended section 4.2 of
Subchapter 4 to lower the current SIP
approved particle emission rates for
existing coal-fired boilers and for coalfired boilers with a particle control
apparatus that is newly constructed,
installed or reconstructed. Owners/
operators must comply with the new
particle emission rates unless otherwise
specified in an enforceable agreement
with New Jersey. Note, particulates and
particles are synonymous terms.
The particulate emission rates in
section 7:27–4.2(a) are unchanged from
emission rates in the current SIP
approved Subchapter 4. The emission
rates listed in section 7:27–4.2(a) will no
longer apply for any coal-fired boiler or
particulate control apparatus regulated
by new sections 7:27–4.2(b) or 7:27–
4.2(c) on and after the required
compliance dates. The compliance date
for sources subject to 7:27–4.2(b) is May
19, 2009; the compliance date for
sources subject to 7:27–4.2(c) is
December 15, 2012.
The particulate emission rate listed in
section 7:27–4.2(b) of 0.0150 pounds per
million BTUs (MMBTU) shall apply for
coal fired boilers that have a particulate
control apparatus that is newly
constructed, installed, reconstructed,
and commences operation on or after
May 19, 2009. The owner or operator
shall demonstrate compliance based on
the average of three stack tests,
approved by New Jersey, and in
accordance with the source’s approved
permit. A coal-fired boiler or particulate
control apparatus is also subject, as
applicable, to existing New Jersey stateof-the-art requirements at 7:27–8.12 and
22:35, lowest achievable emission rate
requirements at NJAC 7:27–18, and best
available control technology
requirements at 40 CFR 52.21, which are
incorporated into the applicable
implementation plan by reference.
Unless regulated by 7:27–4.2(b), the
particulate emission rate listed in
section 7:27–4.2(c) shall apply for coal
fired boilers in operation prior to May
19, 2009. Coal fired boilers are subject
to an emission rate limit of 0.0300
pounds per MMBTU, or the permitted
emission rate in effect as of May 19,
2009, whichever is lower. The owner or
operator shall demonstrate compliance
based on the average of three stack tests,
approved by New Jersey, and in
accordance with the source’s approved
permit.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
21200
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to Subchapter
4, which further reduce particulate
emissions in the State.
G. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 10—‘‘Sulfur in Solid
Fuels?’’
New Jersey previously submitted
Subchapter 10 (state effective date July
14, 1981) as a SIP revision and EPA
approved it on November 3, 1981 (46 FR
54542). In this action, EPA is acting on
amendments that affect facilities that
emit sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions
from solid fuel burning sources,
including boilers serving electric
generating units (EGUs). The
amendments include new definitions
and more stringent emission limits for
SO2.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 10.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 10.1,
Definitions to add and/or revise terms
and their definitions.
EPA evaluated New Jersey’s
definitions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy, and
proposes to approve them.
Section 10.2 Sulfur Contents
Standards
New Jersey amended section 10.2 of
Subchapter 10 to require sources to
comply with more stringent SO2
emission rates contained in section
7:27–10.2(h), and to eliminate the need
to control SO2 emissions by regulating
the sulfur content of solid fuel. Owners/
operators must comply with the new
SO2 emission rates unless otherwise
specified in an enforceable agreement
with New Jersey.
Section 7:27–10.2(a), which regulates
the sulfur content of solid fuel stored,
offered for sale, sold, delivered or
exchanged in trade, for use in New
Jersey, and section 7:27–10.2(b), which
regulates the sulfur content of solid fuel
burned, will no longer apply to any
source after December 14, 2012.
Additionally, existing section 7:27–
10.2(c), which required different
emission standards based on the level of
SO2 nonattainment of a particular zone,
will no longer apply after December 14,
2012. Existing sections 7:27–10.2(d),(e),
and (f), which also regulate SO2
emissions based on the sulfur content of
fuel, and subsection (g), which applies
to authorizations granted pursuant to
subsection (f), will also no longer apply
after December 14, 2012.
Pursuant to section 7:27–10.2(h), all
sources that combust solid fuel on or
after December 15, 2012 must comply
with the maximum SO2 emission rate of
0.250 pounds/MMBtu gross heat input
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
based on a 24-hour emission rate and
0.150 pounds/MMBtu gross heat input
based on a 30-calendar-day rolling
average emission rate. Any source that
combusts solid fuel, and that is
constructed, installed, reconstructed, or
modified, is also subject, as applicable,
to existing New Jersey state-of-the-art
requirements at 7:27–8.12 and 22:35,
lowest achievable emission rate
requirements at NJAC 7:27–18, and best
available control technology
requirements at 40 CFR 52.21, which are
incorporated into the applicable
implementation plan by reference.
Pursuant to section 7:27–10.2(j),
owners/operators of boilers may request,
from New Jersey, a one-year extension
of the December 15, 2012 compliance
deadline. Section 10.2(j) provides the
necessary administrative and procedural
requirements for owners to submit an
extension request and the conditions
under which New Jersey will approve
the extension request.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to this existing
provision, which address SO2 emissions
from solid fuel burning.
Section 10.5 SO2 Emission Rate
Determinations
Section 10.5 of Subchapter 10 is a
new provision that establishes
procedures for calculating the 24-hour
and 30-calendar-day rolling average
emission rates for SO2 that are specified
in 10.2(h).
SO2 emissions must be determined
through the use of a Continuous
Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS).
Section 10.5(c) allows owners/operators
to exclude emissions when the units are
not combusting solid fuel. Section
10.5(c)1 allows an exemption from the
30 calendar day SO2 emission rate
during the period of startup until the
unit begins combusting coal. Section
10.5(c)2 allows an exemption from the
24-hour SO2 emission rate during the
period of time that the boiler does not
combust coal. New Jersey provided for
this exemption to exclude emissions
from periods when the boiler is
combusting fuel other than solid fuels,
such as fuel oil or natural gas, which
can be burned during the start-up of
coal fired boilers.
EPA supports these amendments and
is proposing to approve them.
H. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 16: ‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile
Organic Compounds?’’
New Jersey previously submitted
Subchapter 16 (state effective date
October 17, 2005) as a SIP revision and
EPA approved it on July 31, 2007 (72 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41626). In this action, EPA is acting on
amendments to Subchapter 16 that
affect the following VOC sources or
source categories: VOC stationary
storage tanks; sources subject to control
technique guidelines (CTGs) for flat
wood paneling coatings, flexible
packaging printing materials and offset
lithographic printing and letterpress
printing; sources subject to alternative
or facility-specific VOC control
requirements; and asphalt used for
paving;
Section 16.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 16.1,
Definitions, to add and/or revise terms
and their definitions.
EPA evaluated New Jersey’s
definitions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Section 16.2 VOC Stationary Storage
Tanks
New Jersey has reevaluated the level
of controls currently required for
stationary storage tanks that store VOC
by studying controls that have been
successfully implemented in other
states. The revisions primarily affect
those tanks in Range III which is the
range that covers larger tanks that store
high vapor pressure VOC, such as
gasoline, located at refineries, terminals,
and pipeline breakout stations. The new
requirements can be grouped into five
categories: deck fittings and seals,
domes, roof landings, degassing and
cleaning operations, and inspection and
maintenance procedures.
Deck Fittings and Seals
New Jersey revised section 16.2(l) to
add provisions that require roof
penetrations, such as slotted guide
poles, access hatches, and adjustable
roof legs to have seals, and require
upgraded seals for other deck fittings. In
addition they provide more stringent
rim seal system requirements for
existing and new storage tanks in Range
III and require roof openings to be
maintained in a leak-free condition, as
determined by EPA Method 21 (40 CFR
part 60, Appendix A).
Domes
New Jersey revised section 16.2(l) to
require, with some exceptions, that
domes be installed on external floating
roof tanks that store materials with true
vapor pressures greater than three
pound per square inch absolute (psia).
Any tanks exempted from the
requirement of section 16.2(l) must still
comply with other requirements in
section 16.2 for tanks in existence on
May 18, 2009, the day before the
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
operative date of these provisions.
Compliance is required the first time an
existing tank is degassed following May
19, 2009, the operative date of these
revisions, but no later than May 1, 2020.
A new tank is required to comply before
the tank is initially filled.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Roof Landings
Sections 16.2(n), (o), and (p) are new
provisions that New Jersey designed to
minimize emissions when a tank goes
through a ‘‘roof landing cycle.’’ A roof
landing cycle is composed of three
phases: the removal of all stored liquid
VOC (the floating roof is no longer in
contact with the stored liquid VOC, but
is supported by legs or cables), the
idling period (when the tank is waiting
to be refilled), and the refilling of the
tank. Pursuant to 16.2(p)(1)(i), any
floating roof tank existing on May 19,
2009 and not exempt pursuant to
16.2(f)(6), must submit to NJDEP, by
December 1, 2009, a complete, written
facility-wide tank VOC control plan.
Pursuant to 16.2(p)(1)(ii) any new tank,
excluding those exempt pursuant to
16.2(f)(6), must submit to NJDEP, by 120
days of installation, a written new or
updated facility-wide tank VOC control
plan. Pursuant to 16.2(p)(2)(ii),
schedules for implementation of
emission controls by May 19, 2019 are
to be consistent with the facility’s
schedule for tank removal from service
for normal inspection and maintenance
and with the facility’s schedule for the
installation of any new tanks. As an
alternative to the implementation
schedule of emission controls, storage
tanks in Range III that store gasoline
may submit an emissions averaging plan
pursuant to 16.2(p)2.iii.
Degassing and Cleaning Operations
Storage tanks must be periodically
cleaned and accumulated sludge
removed. Before this can occur, tanks
must be degassed (removal of gases that
remain after the liquid has been
removed). Section 16.2(q) is a new
provision that contains requirements for
handling the gases and sludge that must
be removed when a tank is degassed and
cleaned between May 1 and September
30. Compliance with these requirements
begins on May 1, 2010. Displaced
vapors must be sent to a vapor control
system with at least 95 percent control
efficiency. Section 16.2(q) also contains
approved methods for cleaning the
inside of the tank. Sludge from tanks
that contained a VOC with a vapor
pressure greater than 1.5 psia (pounds
per square inch absolute) must be
transferred to receiving vessels that are
controlled to prevent 95 percent of the
emissions from being released to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
atmosphere. Sludge containers must be
kept vapor tight and free from liquid
leaks.
Inspection and Maintenance
Section 16.2(r) is a new provision that
applies to VOC storage tanks in Range
III and requires that the tanks in this
range be inspected by an authorized
inspector and the results recorded on an
inspection form (contained in
Subchapter 16, Appendix II). Section
16.2(r) specifically identifies what must
be annually inspected and what must be
inspected once a tank is degassed but
not less than once every 10 years. Any
equipment that does not meet
Subchapter 16 requirements must be
repaired or replaced.
EPA evaluated the section 16.2
provisions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Section 16.7 Surface Coating and
Graphic Arts Operations
Offset Lithographic Printing and
Letterpress Printing
New Jersey revised section 16.7 to
address the CTG for Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing.
Subsections (r) and (s) were added and
require more stringent emission
controls. Where more resource intensive
emission controls are necessary or
involve modifying the equipment,
compliance is required by May 1, 2010.
The VOC solvent content of fountain
solutions is limited depending on the
type of equipment and the limits must
be complied with by May 19, 2009.
Cleaning materials are restricted to a
composite vapor pressure less than 10
mm Hg (millimeters mercury) or VOC
content of less than 70 percent by
weight with some exceptions after May
19, 2009.
In addition, section 16.7(t) was added
and requires, effective May 19, 2009,
best management practices, such as,
keeping VOC and VOC containing
materials in closed containers, ensuring
mixing vessels have covers and are kept
closed when not adding or removing
materials, keeping VOC containing shop
towels in closed containers, and
recordkeeping requirements. The above
changes are consistent with the CTG
recommendations issued on October 5,
2006.
EPA evaluated these provisions for
consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Flexible Package Printing
The New Jersey amendments to
section 16.7 address the CTG for
Flexible Package Printing. Section
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21201
16.7(h)(3) was added and requires more
stringent emission controls for
rotogravure, sheet-fed gravure, or
flexographic printing operations
installed or modified on or after May 19,
2010. Section 16.7, Table 7D –Part B
contains new maximum allowable VOC
content of surface coating formulations
(minus water) limits. Section 16.7(t)
requires best management practices (see
above description). These amendments
are consistent with the CTG
recommendations issued on October 5,
2006.
EPA evaluated these provisions for
consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Flat Wood Paneling and Printed
Hardwood Coatings
The New Jersey amendments to
section 16.7 address the CTG for Flat
Wood Paneling and Printed Hardwood
Coatings. Section 16.7, Table 7B
contains new maximum allowable VOC
content per volume of coating (minus
water) limits for flat wood paneling and
printed hardwood coatings of 2.1
pounds per gallon with a compliance
date of May 19, 2009. Section 16.7(t)
requires best management practices (see
above description).
The amendments to section 16.7 are
consistent with the CTG
recommendations issued on October 5,
2006. EPA has evaluated these
provisions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Section 16.11 Asphalt Pavement
Production Plants
The New Jersey amendments to
section 16.11 clarify that it applies to
plants where asphalt pavement is
produced. There were no changes to the
requirements.
EPA evaluated this provision for
consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve it.
Section 16.17 Alternative and FacilitySpecific VOC Control Requirements
The New Jersey amendments to
section 16.17 limit the duration of an
approved VOC alternative control plan
to ten years. Section 16.17(c)5 provides
that, for control plans issued after May
19, 2009, sources can reapply for a new
plan the year before the existing
alternate control plan expires. Sources
with VOC control plans issued prior to
May 19, 2009 must reapply and
demonstrate continued justification or
comply with the specific Subchapter 16
requirements for that source. If the
source does not submit a proposed plan
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
21202
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
by August 17, 2009, the existing plan
terminates on August 17, 2009 and the
source must comply with all applicable
provisions of Subchapter 16. All
alternative control plans must be
submitted by the State to EPA for
approval as a revision to the SIP.
EPA has evaluated these provisions
for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
Section 16.19 Application of Cutback
and Emulsified Asphalts
The New Jersey amendments to
section 16.19 further reduce the amount
of VOC that is allowed to be included
in cutback asphalt or emulsified asphalt
used between April 16 through October
14 to no greater than 0.1 percent VOC
by weight or no greater than 6.0
milliliters of oil distillate, in accordance
with ASTM Method D244, Standard
Test Methods and Practices for
Emulsified Asphalts, or AASHTO T 59,
Standard Method of Test for Testing
Emulsified Asphalts. In addition, it
requires cutback asphalt or emulsified
asphalt to be stored in sealed containers
from April 16 through October 14. Both
these requirements are applicable as of
April 16, 2009. EPA evaluated these
provisions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Other Changes to Subchapter 16
In addition to the above, New Jersey
modified Subchapter 16 to make
technical and administrative
corrections, to delete outdated
provisions, such as the repealed Open
Market Emissions Trading Program, and
to clarify the use of terms in section
16.17.
EPA evaluated these provisions for
consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
I. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution From
Oxides of Nitrogen?’’
The following is a summary of EPA’s
evaluation of New Jersey’s April 21,
2009 SIP submittal consisting of new
provisions and amendments to existing
provisions to Subchapters 19.
New Jersey previously submitted
Subchapter 19 as a SIP revision to
address the NOX RACT requirements,
which EPA approved as SIP revisions
on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3804),
March 29, 1999 (64 FR 14832) and July
31, 2007 (72 FR 41626). New Jersey also
developed a NOX Budget Trading
Program, which EPA approved as a SIP
revision on May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28063),
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
and the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
program, which EPA approved as a SIP
revision on October 1, 2007 (72 FR
55666). The current submission
provides new provisions and
amendments that establish more
stringent RACT limits for facilities that
emit NOX. New Jersey revised
Subchapter 19 to require owners and
operators to implement the following
new provisions and amendments to
existing provisions:
1. New Provisions
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
Incinerators
Section 19.12 of Subchapter 19 is a
new provision that establishes a NOX
emission limit, compliance monitoring
requirements and compliance dates for
any size MSW incinerator. The new
NOX emission limit is 150 parts per
million measured on a dry volume basis
(ppmvd) at 7% oxygen, averaged over a
calendar day is set forth in section
19.12(a). If the NOX emission limit
cannot be achieved, section 19.12(b)
provides that owners/operators of the
MSW incinerator can comply by
obtaining an alternative maximum
allowable NOX emission rate pursuant
to section 19.13 of Subchapter 19. In
accordance with section 19.13(h), any
State approved alternative maximum
allowable NOX emission limit pursuant
to 19.13(c) or NOX control plan
pursuant to 19.13(b) must be submitted
by New Jersey to EPA for approval as a
SIP revision. Section 19.12(c) provides
that compliance with the NOX limit is
to be demonstrated with a continuous
emission monitoring system (CEMS),
pursuant to section 19.18 of Subchapter
19. Compliance is due by July 18, 2009
if achieved by optimization of an
existing NOX air pollution control
system (APCS) without modifying the
incinerator, however the date is
extended to May 1, 2011 if compliance
must be achieved by installing a NOX
APCS or if it is necessary to physically
modify the incinerator.
The NOX emission limit of 150
ppmvd is more stringent than the
federal limits currently in effect for
existing large and small MSW
incinerators (see 40 CFR Part 62,
Subparts FFF and JJJ) and is more
stringent than the limits previously
approved by EPA as source-specific SIP
revisions submitted by New Jersey,
pursuant to section 19.13 of Subchapter
19.
EPA supports these new provisions
and is proposing to approve them.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Sewage Sludge Incinerators
Section 19.28 of Subchapter 19 is a
new provision that establishes NOX
emission limits and compliance
requirements for sewage sludge
incinerators. Section 19.28(a) provides
that the NOX emission limit is 7.0
pounds NOX per ton of dry sewage
sludge for Multiple Hearth type
incinerators and 2.5 pounds NOX per
ton of dry sewage sludge for Fluidized
Bed type incinerators, unless the owner/
operator is complying with alternative
compliance options at section 19.3(f) of
Subchapter 19. The NOX emission limit
of 7.0 pounds NOX per ton of dry
sewage sludge for Multiple Hearth type
incinerators is more stringent than the
limits previously approved by EPA as
source-specific SIP revisions submitted
by New Jersey, pursuant to section 19.13
of Subchapter 19. EPA did not
previously receive any source-specific
SIP revisions from New Jersey for
Fluidized Bed type sewage sludge
incinerators.
Pursuant to section 19.15(a) of
Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
sewage sludge incinerators must
demonstrate compliance with either a
CEMS or source emission tests.
Pursuant to sections 19.15(b) and (c),
owners/operators shall meet the
following compliance demonstration
dates: (1) For a source that was in
operation before January 1, 1995,
compliance is to be demonstrated at the
frequency set forth in the permit for the
equipment; and (2) for a source that
commenced operation or is altered after
January 1, 1995, initial compliance is to
be demonstrated within 180 days of
when the source commences operation.
Pursuant to section 19.3(f) of
Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
sewage sludge incinerators may comply
by using one of the alternative options
listed in 19.3(f)(1)–(4) or a combination
of options (1) and (3). The options in
section 19.3(f) are: (1) An emissions
averaging plan approved by New Jersey
pursuant to sections 19.6 and 19.14; (2)
an alternative maximum allowable NOX
emission rate approved by New Jersey
pursuant to section 19.13; (3) a plan for
seasonal fuel switching approved by
New Jersey pursuant to sections 19.14
and 19.20; and (4) a plan for phased
compliance through the use of either
repowering approved by New Jersey
pursuant to section 19.21 or innovative
control technology approved by New
Jersey pursuant to section 19.23. In
accordance with New Jersey’s
requirements for phased compliance
through the use of either repowering or
innovative control technology, owners/
operators were required to have applied
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
to implement a plan by February 7, 2006
and to have fully implemented the plans
by November 7, 2009. Since the New
Jersey compliance deadlines have past,
unless already fully implemented by
November 7, 2009, these two phased
compliance plan options are no longer
available as control options.
When Subchapter 19 was last
approved, EPA stated that it takes no
action to either approve or disapprove
the existing provisions for phased
compliance using repowering or
innovative control technology at
sections 19.21 and 19.23, respectively,
because they contain a compliance date
of November 7, 2009, which was beyond
the 1-hour ozone attainment date
deadline. See 72 FR 41626, July 31,
2007. EPA continues to take no action
on the phased compliance provisions at
sections 19.21 and 19.23, which are no
longer viable control options, and
requests New Jersey to delete this date
which has now passed the next time
Subchapter 19 is revised.
EPA supports these changes and is
proposing to approve this new
provision.
High Electric Demand Days (HEDD)
Electric Generating Units (EGUs)
Sections 19.29 and 30 of Subchapter
19 are new provisions that establish a
short term and a long term control
strategy, respectively, for limiting NOX
emissions on ‘‘HEDD’’ and establishing,
as applicable, recordkeeping, reporting,
and monitoring requirements for EGUs
operating on HEDD which are typically
days during the summer months when
both temperatures and ozone levels can
be high. Section 19.1 defines a ‘‘HEDD
unit’’ as an EGU, capable of generating
15 megawatts or more, that commenced
operation prior to May 1, 2005, and that
operated less than or equal to an average
of 50 percent of the time during the
ozone seasons of 2005 through 2007.1
Section 19.1 defines an HEDD as a day
on which the generating load is forecast
by the PJM Interconnection 2 to have a
peak value of 52,000 megawatts or
higher.
Section 19.29 of Subchapter 19,
contains the short term strategy to
achieve NOX reductions from HEDD
units starting on May 19, 2009 through
September 30, 2014 thereby providing
owners/operators of affected units time
to develop and implement the long term
strategy pursuant to section 19.30,
1 HEDD units can include some stationary gas
turbines and some boilers.
2 PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission
organization (RTO) that coordinates the movement
of wholesale electricity in all or parts of 13 states
and the District of Columbia, including the State of
New Jersey.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
which requires compliance with the
more stringent NOX emission limits at
amended sections 19.4 and 19.5 for
boilers and combustion turbines,
respectively. HEDD units applicable to
section 19.29 are old units that typically
emit high levels of NOX on HEDD.
The short term strategy is based upon
a March 2, 2007 Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) 3 signed by New
Jersey and the other member states of
the Ozone Transport Commission
(OTC). This MOU commits New Jersey
to reduce NOX emissions associated
with HEDD units by 19.8 tons per day
(TPD) on high electric demand days.
Pursuant to section 19.29(b), this short
term strategy requires owners/operators
of HEDD units to do the following: (1)
By June 18, 2009, submit to New Jersey
an approvable ‘‘2009 Protocol’’ that
defines all of the control measures
pursuant to section 19.29(d) needed to
achieve its share of the statewide NOX
emission reductions from HEDD units,
on each HEDD day during the period
May 19, 2009 through September 30,
2014, as determined by ‘Equation 1’ of
section 19.29(c); (2) provide a
demonstration that all the required NOX
reductions were obtained and include a
demonstration in an annual report,
pursuant to section 19.29(k); and (3)
submit the annual report to New Jersey
by January 30th of the following year,
pursuant to section 19.29(k).
The short term strategy also defines
the applicability of the rule to specific
affected sources, provides for
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, provides detailed
compliance requirements of an
approvable 2009 Protocol, and
establishes permitting requirements.
It should be noted that pursuant to
section 19.29(b)(3) of New Jersey’s short
term strategy, owners/operators of
subject HEDD units may request the
State’s approval of a phased compliance
plan, pursuant to section 19.22, which
provides an additional year for
compliance with the required NOX
reductions due to impracticality. During
the interim period, section 19.22(g)(4)
requires owners/operators of an
approved phased compliance plan to
control NOX emissions either by
adjusting the combustion process or
seasonally combusting natural gas,
pursuant to section 19.20, or
implementing other control measures
that New Jersey determines are
appropriate.
3 ‘‘Memorandum of Understanding Among the
States of the Ozone Transport Commission
Concerning the Incorporation of High Electric
Demand Day Emission Reduction Strategies into
Ozone Attainment State Implementation Planning’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21203
In addition to meeting the NOX
reductions, (tons/HEDD) as provided in
Equation 1, for the period from May 20,
2009 through April 30, 2015 owners/
operators of HEDD units that are
stationary combustion turbines are also
required to meet a specific NOX
emission limit (expressed as lbs/
MMBTU), pursuant to section 19.5, as
follows: (1) Table 4 emission limits
apply for simple cycle combustion
turbines; and (2) Table 5 emission limits
apply for combined cycle or
regenerative cycle combustion turbines.
New Jersey’s long term NOX reduction
strategy provided in section 19.30 of
Subchapter 19 addresses requirements
for owners/operators of HEDD units
meeting new NOX emission limits
starting in 2015 and beyond. As stated
above, the new more stringent NOX
emission limits, for boilers and
combustion turbines, respectively, are
provided in the new amendments in
sections 19.4 and 19.5. Owners/
operators of HEDD units are required to
submit to New Jersey a ‘‘2015 HEDD
Emission Limit Achievement Plan’’
(‘‘2015 Plan’’) by May 1, 2010. The
purpose of the 2015 Plan is to document
how the owner/operator intends to
comply with the 2015 HEDD NOX
emission limits and to provide a
schedule by which the new emission
limits will be achieved for each HEDD
unit. Owners/operators of HEDD units
are required to submit to New Jersey an
annual update on the progress of the
2015 Plan for each calendar year from
2010 through 2014. Owners/operators of
HEDD units are required to indicate any
obstacles that might impede progress in
achieving compliance with the
applicable 2015 NOX emission limit and
any steps needed to overcome these
obstacles in their annual updates.
EPA supports the new provisions,
which address NOX reductions from
HEDD units and proposes to approve
them.
2. Amendments to Existing Provisions
Boilers Serving Electric Generating
Units (EGUs)
New Jersey revised section 19.4 of
Subchapter 19 by lowering the current
SIP approved NOX emission rates, and
by providing new compliance dates, as
summarized in Tables 1–3 of
Subchapter 19, for boilers serving EGUs.
Owners/operators must comply with the
new NOX emission rates unless they are
complying with the alternative
compliance options in section 19.3(f) 4
4 Whenever EPA refers to section 19.3(f), the
reader is referred to the discussion at section I.I.1
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
Continued
23APP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
21204
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
or unless otherwise specified in an
enforceable agreement with New Jersey.
The NOX emission rates in Table 1 of
the amendments are the same as the
emission rates in the current SIP
approved Subchapter 19 and are
required to be complied with until
December 14, 2012. For coal boilers, the
NOX emission rates in Tables 2 and 3
are lowered to 1.5 pounds per megawatt
hour (lb/MWh), resulting in additional
NOX reductions ranging from about 75
percent to 85 percent, depending upon
the boiler type, and the operative
compliance date is December 15, 2012.
New Jersey revised the NOX emission
rates from heat input based rates
(pounds per MMBTU) in Table 1 to the
production output based rates (lb/MWh)
provided in Tables 2 and 3. Output
based limits encourage sources to
improve plant operating efficiency and
encourage pollution prevention
measures, such as clean energy supply,
which result in reduced fuel
consumption and reduced emission of
pollutants, including NOX.
When calculating a 24-hour NOX
emission rate for coal combustion at a
coal boiler, section 19.4 allows owners/
operators to exclude emissions during
startup and shutdown under the
following restricted conditions: (1) For
startup, when the unit is not combusting
fossil fuel (coal), for a period not to
exceed 8 hours, from initial combustion
until the unit combusts coal and is
synchronized with a utility electric
distribution system; and (2) for
shutdown, when the unit is no longer
combusting coal and no longer
synchronized with a utility electric
distribution system. New Jersey
provided for this exemption because of
technological limitations: Selective
catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective
non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) control
technologies do not control NOX
emissions effectively at lower than
optimum temperatures that can occur
during startup and shutdown periods.
EPA is in agreement with New Jersey’s
exemption for the following reasons: (1)
The impact on ambient air quality is
minimized by New Jersey’s narrowly
defined startup and shutdown
requirements; (2) the exemption only
applies during startup and shutdown
periods when coal is not combusted; (3)
the NOX control strategies have
technological limitations during startup
and shutdown periods; and (4) New
Jersey requires compliance with oil/gas
NOX emission limits during this startup/
shutdown period. This startup/
of this rulemaking relating to sewage sludge
incinerators.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
shutdown exemption is consistent with
EPA’s guidance as discussed in the TSD.
For oil and gas boilers, the NOX
emission rates provided in section 19.4,
Table 3, expressed as lb/MWh, are more
stringent as follows: (1) 2.0 for boilers
combusting heavier than No. 2 fuel oil,
resulting in additional NOX reductions
as high as 53 percent, depending upon
the boiler type; and (2) 1.0 for boilers
combusting either No. 2 and lighter fuel
oil or gas only, resulting in additional
NOX reductions ranging from about 50
percent to 76 percent, depending upon
the boiler type.
The operative compliance date for oil
and gas fired boilers that are subject to
the new NOX emission rates in Table 3
is May 1, 2015.
Pursuant to section 19.4(f) of
Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
coal-fired boilers may request from New
Jersey a one-year extension of both the
December 15, 2012 emission limit
compliance deadline and the June 15,
2013 compliance demonstration
deadline required at section 19.4(d)(1).
Section 19.4(f) provides the necessary
administrative and procedural
requirements for owners to submit an
extension request and the conditions
under which New Jersey will approve
the extension request.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP-approved provision as they provide
for further NOX reductions from boilers
serving EGUs.
Stationary Combustion Turbines
New Jersey revised section 19.5 of
Subchapter 19 to lower the current SIP
approved NOX emission rates and to
provide compliance dates for stationary
combustion turbines, as summarized in
Tables 4–7 of Subchapter 19. The NOX
emission rates in Tables 4 through 6 are
the same as the emission rates in the
current SIP approved Subchapter 19.
Table 7 is applicable to all HEDD unit
stationary combustion turbines or
stationary combustion turbines capable
of generating 15 MW or more that
commenced operation on or after May 1,
2005. The NOX emission rates in Table
7 are more stringent, by approximately
40 to 54 percent, depending upon the
type of turbine and fuel combusted,
than the current Table 6 SIP approved
NOX emission rates. Owners/operators
of affected units must comply with the
Table 7 NOX emission rates on and after
May 1, 2015.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision as they provide
for further NOX reductions from
stationary combustion turbines.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional
(ICI) Boilers and Other Indirect Heat
Exchangers (IHEs)
New Jersey revised section 19.7 of
Subchapter 19 by lowering the current
SIP approved maximum allowable NOX
emission rates, by providing compliance
dates, and by lowering the applicability
threshold for ICI boilers and other IHEs.
The more stringent requirements at
section 19.7 do not apply to ICI boilers
and other IHEs at petroleum refineries.
Owners/operators must comply with the
NOX emission rates unless they are
complying with the alternative
compliance options in section 19.3(f)
(see footnote 4).
The NOX emission rates in the new
Table 9 are more stringent than the
current SIP approved rates in Table 8
and are applicable to owners/operators
of ICI boilers and IHEs, whether or not
the source is located at a facility
classified as major for NOX, for those
sources that are not located at a
petroleum refinery. Newly applicable
sources are required to be in compliance
with the new limits as follows: (1) The
applicability threshold is lowered, for
sources with a heat input rate expressed
as lb/MMBTU, to 25 from 50 lb/
MMBTU and (2) the applicability of
these provisions is extended to ICI
boilers and IHEs not located at a facility
classified as major for NOX. The new
NOX emission rates are lowered as
much as 77%, depending upon the
boiler type and/or fuel combusted. The
State has indicated there are no longer
any coal-fired boilers in operation.
Therefore it has deleted the requirement
to comply with these NOX emission
rates for the source category ‘‘coal-fired
boilers.’’ For sources with a heat input
rate of at least 25 MMBTU/hr but less
than 50 MMBTU/hr, compliance with
the Table 9 NOX emission rates are
required on and after (1) May 1, 2011 if
compliance is achieved without
physically modifying the boiler or IHE
and (2) May 1, 2012 for sources that
comply by a physical modification. For
sources with a heat input rate of at least
50 MMBTU/hr, compliance with the
Table 9 NOX emission rates is required
on and after (1) May 1, 2010 if
compliance is achieved without
physically modifying the boiler or IHE
and (2) May 1, 2011 for sources that
comply by a physical modification.
For ICI boilers and IHEs located at
petroleum refineries, the current SIP
approved NOx emission rates in Table 8
are still applicable.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP-approved provision as the
amendments provide for further NOX
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
reductions from ICI boilers and other
IHEs.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Asphalt Pavement Production Plants
New Jersey revised section 19.9 of
Subchapter 19 by lowering the current
SIP approved maximum allowable NOX
emission limit for dryers at asphalt
production plants, by providing new
compliance dates, and by requiring
implementation and recordkeeping
associated with new best management
practices. The NOX emission limits are
lowered, in the range of 37 to 67
percent, from 200 ppmvd, as measured
at 7 percent oxygen, to more stringent
limits depending upon the fuel
combusted in the dryer. The new NOX
emission limits are as follows: (1) 75
ppmvd for natural gas combustion; (2)
100 ppmvd for No. 2 fuel oil
combustion; and (3) 125 ppmvd for No.
4 fuel oil, heavier fuel oil, onspecification used oil or any mixture of
these three oils. Owners/operators must
comply with the NOX emission limits
unless they are complying with the
alternative compliance options in
section 19.3(f) (see footnote 4). In
addition, owners/operators must
annually adjust the combustion process
of the dryer pursuant to section 19.16 of
Subchapter 19.
Owners/operators of an asphalt
pavement production plant that are
complying without physically
modifying the dryer must be in
compliance with the new NOX emission
limits by the following dates: (1) By May
1, 2011, for sources with a heat input
rate of less than 100 MMBTU/hr and (2)
by May 1, 2010, for sources with a heat
input rate of at least 100 MMBTU/hr.
For owners/operators of sources that
must make physical modifications to
comply, the compliance date is
extended one year for each of the
scenarios above.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision that addresses
NOX reductions from asphalt pavement
production plants.
Glass Manufacturing Furnaces
New Jersey revised section 19.10 of
Subchapter 19 by lowering the current
SIP approved NOX emission limits by
approximately 27 to 64 percent, by
adding new applicable source
categories, and by providing compliance
dates for glass manufacturing furnaces
having the potential to emit more than
10 tons of NOX per year. The new NOX
emission limits for glass manufacturing
furnaces subject to the provisions are
either 4.0 or 9.2 tons NOX per ton of
glass removed from the furnace,
depending upon the type of glass
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
produced and the production rate of the
glass furnace. The amendments
applicable to glass manufacturing
furnaces that produce pressed glass,
blown glass, fiberglass and flat glass are
now regulated by section 19.10.
Pursuant to section 19.10(f), in lieu of
meeting the NOX emission limits at
sections 19.10(a) and (b), owners/
operators of glass manufacturing
furnaces may comply by using the
alternative compliance options at
section 19.10(f), which parallel those for
sewage sludge incinerators at 19.3(f)
(see footnote 4), except that the
alternative compliance option for
innovative control technology and the
phased compliance by repowering are
not allowed by New Jersey.
Owners/operators of glass
manufacturing furnaces are required to
be in compliance with the new NOX
emission limits on and after May 1,
2010. Based on economic
considerations, compliance with the
amendments is required on the first day
of startup after rebricking of the furnace
occurs. Since economic feasibility is one
of the RACT requirements, New Jersey’s
compliance requirement is acceptable to
EPA.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision that addresses
NOX reductions from glass
manufacturing furnaces.
Alternative and Facility-Specific NOX
Emission Limits (AELs and FSELs)
Section 19.13 of Subchapter 19
establishes a procedure for making caseby-case RACT determinations for
facilities classified as major for NOX, for
an item of equipment, or for a source
operation. Owners/operators of major
NOX facilities with emission sources
having a potential to emit of more than
10 tons of NOX per year, where no
previous presumptive NOX emission
limit has been established in Subchapter
19, are required to apply to New Jersey
for a facility-specific emission limit
(FSEL). Where a presumptive NOX
emission limit exists in Subchapter 19
and owners/operators determine that
the presumptive NOX limit cannot be
met by the source, the owners/operators
can apply to New Jersey, pursuant to the
procedures in section 19.13, for an
alternative emission limit (AEL). FSELs
and AELs are determined on a case-bycase basis. Pursuant to section 19.13(h),
any FSEL or AEL approved by New
Jersey must be submitted by the State to
EPA for approval as a revision to the
SIP. If EPA denies the approval of the
proposed NOX plan as a revision to the
SIP, section 19.13(l) provides that New
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21205
Jersey will revoke its approval of the
plan.
Section 19.13 is amended by requiring
owners/operators of each facility with
either an FSEL or an AEL that was
issued by New Jersey before May 1,
2005 to submit a new NOX control plan
by August 17, 2009 unless a 90-day
extension is requested and approved by
the State. Pursuant to section
19.13(b)(1), any FSEL approved by New
Jersey after May 19, 2009 will not have
an expiration date unless there is a
modification, alteration or
reconstruction of the source, for which
the State’s approval of a new FSEL is
required. Pursuant to section 19.13(b)(2)
any AEL approved by New Jersey will
have a term limit of 10 years. An
approval of an AEL is void upon
alteration of the equipment or source
operation, unless New Jersey determines
that the alteration does not materially
affect the basis of the original approval
or the source, prior to the alteration,
applies for and obtains a revised AEL
(see sections 19.13(b)(6) and 19.13(k)).
New Jersey made these amendments
after its review of existing FSELs and
AELs many of which were approved as
long ago as 1997. In many cases, the
State determined that control
technologies have advanced sufficiently
since that time, warranting
reevaluations of these case-by-case
determinations.
EPA supports and proposes to
approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision as they will lead
to potential NOX reductions from
specific-sources.
3. Additional Amendments to
Subchapter 19
New Jersey adopted a number of other
amendments since EPA last approved
amendments to Subchapter 19 (72 FR
41626, July 31, 2007). Among other
things, these amendments (1) Revised
terms and definitions that do not change
the meaning or stringency of the
provisions; (2) revised section 19.2 to
expand the list of the following
applicable source categories: Certain
glass manufacturing furnaces, any
municipal solid waste incinerator, and
any sewage sludge incinerator; (3)
revised section 19.3 to exclude owners/
operators of HEDD units from using
alternative compliance options at
section 19.3(f), beginning on May 1,
2015; and (4) deleted the entire
provision at section 19.27 that referred
to New Jersey’s now defunct Open
Market Trading Program at Subchapter
30 that was repealed in 2004.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
21206
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
4. Compliance Dates
New Jersey amended Subchapter 19
by including new provisions and
amendments to previously approved SIP
provisions that result in more stringent
NOX emission limitations that will lead
to additional reductions in NOX
emissions from the affected major
stationary combustion sources.
New Jersey uses the emission benefits
from the new provisions and
amendments to Subchapter 19 in a
variety of ways in the SIP. Some are
used to meet reasonable further progress
goals, others as a contingency measure
should an area fail to attain the 1997
ozone standard, some to support the
‘‘weight of evidence’’ arguments
concerning attainment of the 1997
ozone standard, and others that will be
used to help to attain the new 2008
ozone standard (currently under
reconsideration) that New Jersey
anticipates will replace the 1997 ozone
standard. In addition, New Jersey was
seeking to fulfill the section 182(b)(2)
and section 172(c)(1) requirements for
RACT as applied to both the 1997 and
2008 ozone standards in setting the
emission standards and compliance due
dates.
Emission reductions required by
sections 182(b)(2) and 172(c)(1) of the
Act, used to fulfill in the 1997 ozone
SIP, are required to be achieved by May
2009. Sources with compliance periods
that go beyond May 2009 are used as
contingency measures or towards
meeting RACT for the 2008 ozone
standard. In determining a compliance
date for a level of control that can be
considered RACT, the time necessary to
make the required modifications and the
cost of modifications were taken into
consideration. For example, rebricking
of a glass manufacturing furnace, which
usually accompanies new emission
controls, is a significant factor in
evaluating both time and expenses
necessary for the project. Requiring a
‘‘rebricking’’ of a furnace before it is
physically necessary would constitute a
significant additional cost that could
result in the new emission controls
being considered economically
unreasonable.
The compliance dates included in
Subchapter 19’s provisions are as
expeditious as practical considering the
level of the required new controls.
Consistent with the Phase 2 Rule, any
emission reduction used in the 1997
ozone SIP is required to occur no later
than the start of the 2009 ozone season,
which is the time by which a state must
demonstrate that it achieved the
necessary emission reductions to meet
the June 15, 2010 attainment date for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
areas that are classified as a moderate
nonattainment area for the 8-hour ozone
standard.
Based on preliminary air quality data
monitored for the 3-year period from
2007–2009, the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City, PA–NJ–MD–
DE nonattainment area is eligible for a
one year extension of its attainment date
to June 15, 2011 because of the clean air
quality data monitored for 2009.
Similarly, the New York-N.New JerseyLong Island, NY–NJ–CT nonattainment
area is eligible for a clean data
determination based on three years of
clean data. In addition, consistent with
EPA’s last approval of Subchapter 19
(see 72 FR 41626, July 31, 2007), EPA
continues to take no further action to
approve or disapprove the existing
provisions for phased compliance by
repowering and innovative control
technology at sections 19.21 and 19.23.
These provisions still include the
compliance date of November 7, 2009,
which is beyond the November 15, 2007
attainment deadline for the NY–NJ–CT
1-hour ozone standard. For this reason,
as indicated in EPA’s July 2007
approval of Subchapter 19, New Jersey
should delete the reference to the
November 7, 2009 compliance date for
these two phased compliance plans.
5. Other Comments
As stated above, owners/operators of
HEDD units subject to New Jersey’s
short term strategy at section 19.29 may
apply to the State for approval of a
phased compliance plan pursuant to
section 19.22 that allows for an
additional year for compliance with the
required NOX reductions due to
demonstrated impracticality. However,
at section 19.1, the definition of ‘‘interim
period’’ allows a source an additional
two years instead of one year from May
19, 2009. As discussed with the State,
New Jersey should revise section 19.1 to
make it consistent with section 19.22.
6. NOX RACT
EPA originally approved Subchapter
19 into the SIP on May 31, 1972. 37 FR
10842, 10880 and 40 CFR 52.1576. This
rule was adopted because the Clean Air
Act requires states to submit to EPA a
plan that provides for implementation,
maintenance and enforcement of a
degree of nitrogen oxide reduction that
is necessary to achieve attainment with
the NAAQS. New Jersey developed,
adopted and submitted to EPA, for
approval into the SIP, Subchapter 19, a
plan for the application of reasonably
available control technology to reduce
nitrogen oxide emissions from
stationary sources.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Pursuant to 40 CFR 81.331, New
Jersey-NO2 table, all areas in New Jersey
are classified as ‘‘Cannot be classified or
better than national standards.’’
New Jersey submitted previous
versions of Subchapter 19 as SIP
revisions which EPA approved as SIP
revisions on January 27, 1997 (62 FR
3804), March 29, 1999 (64 FR 14832)
and July 31, 2007 (72 FR 41626). New
Jersey also developed, adopted and
submitted to EPA a NOX Budget Trading
Program and a Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) program which EPA approved as
SIP revisions on May 22, 2001 (66 FR
28063) and October 1, 2007 (72 FR
55666), respectively. The current
submission provides new provisions
and amendments that establish more
stringent RACT limits for stationary
sources that emit NOX.
Given the previously approved
versions of Subchapter 19 and the most
recent version of Subchapter 19 that
EPA is proposing to approve in this
action, EPA has determined that New
Jersey has met the requirement to adopt
NOX RACT. Therefore, the 40 CFR
52.1576 finding relating to the New
Jersey SIP not providing for NOX RACT
has been satisfied and this finding
should be removed.
J. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of New
Jersey’s Subchapter 21—‘‘Emission
Statements?’’
This rule requires industrial facilities
to report annually detailed information
on specified air pollutant emissions and
process-related data to New Jersey, if the
facility emits or has the potential to emit
air pollutants above a specified
emissions threshold. New Jersey
previously submitted Subchapter 21
(state effective date February 18, 2003)
as a SIP revision and EPA approved it
on August 2, 2004 (69 FR 46106). In this
action, EPA is acting on two revisions
to Subchapter 21, one adopted on
October 30, 2008 with an operative date
of December 29, 2008 and the second
adopted on March 20, 2009 with an
operative date of May 19, 2009.
The October 30, 2008 revision
incorporated changes to the definition
of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in
section 21.1. The new definition
excludes tertiary butyl acetate or t-butyl
acetate (TBAC) from VOC emissions
limitations or VOC content
requirements, but requires that TBAC be
considered a VOC for purposes of
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements. EPA evaluated
New Jersey’s revised VOC definition for
consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy. The
revised definition of VOC as used in the
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
above rules is consistent with EPA’s
definition in 40 CFR 51.100(s). EPA is
proposing to approve this revision.
The March 20, 2009 version
incorporates changes to sections 21.1
and 21.5 that require owners/operators
of VOC stationary storage tanks with
floating roofs to provide additional
emission information concerning roof
landing operations.
EPA evaluated New Jersey’s revisions
for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and
proposes to approve them.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Conclusion
Both Subchapters 16 and 19 contain
provisions which require case-by-case
RACT determinations to be submitted as
SIP revisions. These case-by-case RACT
determinations are needed to fulfill the
RACT requirement of section 182 of the
Act. The State is in the process of
evaluating these determinations for
approval and therefore has not yet
submitted them as SIP revisions. EPA
would normally propose to
conditionally approve this SIP revision
as meeting the RACT requirement
pending New Jersey’s submission and
EPA’s approval of the case-by-case
RACT determinations. However, based
on information provided by New Jersey,
the quantity of NOX and VOC emissions
relevant to these determinations is
below 5 percent of the stationary source
baseline of emissions which is what
EPA considers to be de minimis.
Therefore, pursuant to EPA guidance,5
EPA is proposing to approve
Subchapters 16 and 19. The remaining
element needed to fulfill the VOC RACT
requirement is New Jersey’s Subchapter
26, which New Jersey submitted to EPA
on April 9, 2009, as a SIP revision and
which EPA is currently reviewing.
Therefore, EPA evaluated New
Jersey’s submittal for consistency with
the Act, EPA regulations and policy.
The proposed new control measures
will strengthen the SIP by providing
additional NOX, SO2, fine particulate,
and VOC emission reductions.
Accordingly, EPA is proposing to
approve the revisions to Subchapters 4,
10, 16, 19 and related revisions to
Subchapter 21, as adopted on March 20,
2009, except that EPA is continuing to
not act, for the reasons explained above
in this rulemaking, on the phased
compliance plans by repowering and
innovative control technology in
sections 19.21 and 19.23, respectively.
In addition, EPA is proposing to delete
5 ‘‘Approval Options for Generic RACT Rules
Submitted to Meet the non-CTG VOC RACT
Requirement and Certain NOX RACT
Requirements,’’ November 7, 1996.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:48 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
40 CFR 52.1576, relating to a prior
finding that NOX RACT was not
included in the New Jersey SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21207
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010–9463 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Service
42 CFR Part 416
[CMS–3217–P]
RIN 0938–AP93
Medicare Program; Ambulatory
Surgical Centers, Conditions for
Coverage
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
revise one of the existing conditions for
coverage (CfC) that ambulatory surgical
centers (ASCs) must meet in order to
participate in the Medicare program.
The proposed revision would modify
the current CfC for patient rights to
include an exception that would allow
an ASC to provide patients or the
patients’ representative or surrogate
with required patient rights information
on the day of the procedure when the
procedure must, to safeguard the health
of the patient, be performed on the same
day as the physician’s referral. In
addition, we are proposing some other
minor changes to the CfC for patient
right requirements.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. EST on June 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–3217–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21197-21207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9463]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R02-OAR-2010-0161, FRL-9141-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Implementation
Plan Revision; State of New Jersey
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
a request from the State of New Jersey to revise its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate amendments to Subchapter 4
``Control and Prohibition of Particles from Combustion of Fuel,''
Subchapter 10 ``Sulfur in Solid Fuels,'' Subchapter 16 ``Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic Compounds,''
Subchapter 19 ``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution from Oxides of
Nitrogen,'' and related amendments to Subchapter 21 ``Emission
Statements.'' The amendments relate to the control of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particles
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from stationary sources. This
proposed SIP revision consists of control measures needed to meet the
State's commitment to adopt additional reasonably available control
technology (RACT) rules that address RACT requirements for the 1997
national ambient air quality standards for ozone. Additionally, the
proposed SIP revision includes control measures that will help the
State meet the national ambient air quality standards for fine
particles.
The intended effect of this proposed rule is to approve the State
control strategy, which will result in emission reductions that will
help achieve attainment of the national ambient air quality standards
for ozone and fine particles required by the Clean Air Act (the Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-
R02-OAR-2010-0161, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov.
Fax: 212-637-3901.
Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30 excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-
2010-0161. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly
[[Page 21198]]
to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region II Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway,
25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. EPA requests, if at all
possible, that you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Truchan (truchan.paul@epa.gov)
concerning Subchapters 16 and 21, Anthony (Ted) Gardella
(gardella.anthony@epa.gov) concerning Subchapter 19, and Kenneth
Fradkin (fradkin.kenneth@epa.gov) concerning Subchapters 4 and 10, at
the Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway,
25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For detailed information on New Jersey's
proposed SIP revision see the Technical Support Document (TSD),
prepared in support of today's action. The TSD can be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov.
The following table of contents describes the format of this
rulemaking:
I. EPA's Proposed Action
A. What Action Is EPA Proposing?
B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?
C. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for RACT?
D. How Did New Jersey Address the RACT Requirements for the 8-
Hour Ozone Standard?
E. When Were New Jersey's RACT Requirements Proposed and
Adopted?
F. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 4--
``Control and Prohibition of Particles From Combustion of Fuel?''
G. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 10--
``Sulfur in Solid Fuels?''
H. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 16:
``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds?''
I. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 19
``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution From Oxides of
Nitrogen?''
J. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 21--
``Emission Statements?''
II. Conclusion
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. EPA's Proposed Action
A. What Action Is EPA Proposing?
On April 21, 2009 New Jersey submitted a proposed State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that includes amendments to New
Jersey Administrative Code, Title 7: Chapter 27 (NJAC 7:27) Subchapter
4 ``Control and Prohibition of Particles from Combustion of Fuel;''
Subchapter 8 ``Permits and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and Major
Facilities Without an Operating Permit);'' Subchapter 10 ``Sulfur in
Solid Fuels;'' Subchapter 16 ``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution
by Volatile Organic Compounds;'' Subchapter 19 ``Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution from Oxides of Nitrogen;'' and Subchapter
21 ``Emission Statements.''
EPA proposes to approve the state amendments to Subchapter 4 and
Subchapter 10 as revisions to the SIP. These amendments relate to the
control of particle and sulfur dioxide emissions and will help the
State make advances towards reducing regional haze and meeting the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particles.
EPA will review Subchapter 8 and will address the approvability of
all Subchapter 8 amendments in a future action.
EPA proposes to approve, as revisions to the New Jersey ozone SIP,
the state-adopted amendments to Subchapter 16 and Subchapter 19, and
related amendments to Subchapter 21, each adopted by New Jersey on
March 20, 2009, and submitted to EPA on April 21, 2009. New Jersey
amended Subchapter 16 and Subchapter 19 to meet the State's commitment
to adopt additional RACT rules for 12 of 13 source categories (see 74
FR 2945, January 16, 2009), which will result in additional emission
reductions of NOX and VOCs. EPA proposes that New Jersey's
state-adopted Subchapters 16 and 19, and the related amendments to
Subchapter 21, are fully approvable as SIP-strengthening measures for
New Jersey's ozone SIP. The amendments to Subchapters 16, 19 and 21 in
New Jersey's submittal meet the State's commitment to adopt additional
RACT control measures for 12 of 13 source categories to achieve
additional emission reductions of NOX and VOCs to attain the
8-hour ozone standard. The one remaining source category, adhesives and
sealants, will be addressed in a separate rulemaking.
B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?
EPA is proposing this action to:
Give the public the opportunity to submit comments on
EPA's proposed action;
Approve control measures which reduce NOX and
VOC emissions, a precursor of ozone formation, to help attain the NAAQS
for ozone;
Further New Jersey's and EPA's RACT requirements under the
Clean Air Act (the Act); and
Make New Jersey's regulations for additional emission
reductions federally enforceable and available for emission reduction
credit in the SIP.
Approve control measures that reduce particles, sulfur
dioxide, and NOX emissions, to help attain the NAAQS for
fine particles.
Approve control measures that reduce regional haze.
C. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for RACT?
Sections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the Act require
nonattainment areas that are designated as moderate or above to adopt
RACT. All of New Jersey is subject to this requirement since all
counties in the State are located in either of two nonattainment areas
that are classified as moderate ozone nonattainment areas for the 8-
hour ozone standard (40 CFR 81.331). In accordance with section 182(b),
New Jersey must, at a minimum, adopt RACT level controls for sources
covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document and for any
major non-CTG sources.
Section IV.G of EPA's Phase 2 implementation rule (70 FR 71612,
November 29, 2005) (Phase 2 Rule) discusses the RACT requirements for
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. It states, in part, that where a RACT
SIP
[[Page 21199]]
is required, SIPs implementing the 8-hour ozone standard generally must
assure that RACT is met, either through a certification that previously
required RACT controls represent RACT for 8-hour ozone implementation
purposes or, where necessary, through a new RACT determination. The
majority of counties in New Jersey were previously classified under the
1-hour ozone standard as severe, while the remaining counties were
subject to RACT as part of the Ozone Transport Region. New Jersey chose
a uniform applicability level for RACT based on the severe
classification which resulted in a statewide requirement for major
sources of NOX and VOC to be defined as those having
emissions of 25 tons per year or more of both VOC and/or
NOX. Under the 8-hour standard, areas classified as
moderate, the definition for major source is 50 tons per year for VOC
and 100 tons per year for NOX. However, New Jersey's choice
to retain the original 1-hour ozone limits statewide in New Jersey for
purposes of the RACT analysis resulted in a more stringent evaluation
of RACT. New Jersey's use of 25 tons per year for RACT is consistent
with the anti-backsliding requirement of the Act. See Clean Air Act
sections 110(l) and 193; and South Coast Air Quality Management Dist
(SCAQMD) v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
D. How Did New Jersey Address the RACT Requirements for the 8-Hour
Ozone Standard?
New Jersey submitted a RACT assessment in an August 1, 2007
submission which was supplemented on December 14, 2007. The RACT
submission from the State of New Jersey consisted of: (1) A
certification that previously adopted RACT controls in New Jersey's SIP
for 101 source categories that were approved by EPA under the 1-hour
ozone standard are based on the currently available technically and
economically feasible controls, and that they continue to represent
RACT for 8-hour ozone implementation purposes; (2) a commitment to
adopt new or more stringent regulations that represent RACT control
levels for both specific source categories and specific sources; and
(3) a negative declaration that for certain Control Techniques
Guidelines and/or Alternative Control Techniques (ACTs) documents there
are no sources within New Jersey or that there are no sources above the
applicable thresholds.
EPA reviewed the State's RACT analysis and agreed with the State's
conclusions. On May 15, 2009 (74 FR 22837) EPA conditionally approved
New Jersey's RACT SIP for the 8-hour ozone standard conditioned on the
State's meeting its commitment to submit adopted RACT rules for 13
source categories by April 1, 2009. To address this commitment, on
March 20, 2009, New Jersey adopted the RACT rules for the following 12
source categories: Alternative and facility-specific VOC and
NOX emission limits; emulsified and cutback asphalt used for
paving; asphalt pavement production plants; CTGs published in 2006:
flat wood paneling, flexible packaging printing materials, and offset
lithographic printing and letterpress printing; coal-fired boilers
serving electric generating units (EGUs); oil and gas-fired boilers
serving EGUs; High Electric Demand Day (HEDD) EGUs; industrial/
commercial/institutional boilers and other indirect heat exchangers;
municipal solid waste incinerators; glass manufacturing furnaces;
sewage sludge incinerators; and VOC stationary storage tanks. The
industrial adhesives and sealants source category (13th) was adopted on
October 30, 2008 and submitted as a SIP revision on April 9, 2009. EPA
will propose action on the adhesives and sealant rule in a separate
action.
E. When Were New Jersey's RACT Requirements Proposed and Adopted?
New Jersey proposed the RACT rules at Subchapters 4, 10, 16 and 19,
and related amendments to Subchapter 21, on August 4, 2008, accepted
written comments on them until October 3, 2008, and held public
hearings on them on September 26, 2008. New Jersey adopted the amended
RACT rules and related requirements on March 20, 2009, and submitted
them to EPA for approval as revisions to the SIP on April 21, 2009. On
June 4, 2009, EPA determined the submittal to be administratively and
technically complete.
F. What is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 4--``Control and
Prohibition of Particles From Combustion of Fuel?''
New Jersey previously submitted Subchapter 4 (state effective date
October 12, 1977) as a SIP revision and EPA approved it on January 27,
1984 (49 FR 3465). In this action, EPA is acting on the April 21, 2009
submittal of amendments to Subchapter 4 that affect the coal-fired
boiler source category, which consist of new definitions and more
stringent emission limits for facilities that emit particles from coal-
fired boilers.
Section 4.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 4.1, Definitions, to add and/or revise
terms and their definitions. EPA evaluated New Jersey's definitions for
consistency with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy, and proposes
to approve them.
Section 4.2 Standards for the Emission of Particles
New Jersey amended section 4.2 of Subchapter 4 to lower the current
SIP approved particle emission rates for existing coal-fired boilers
and for coal-fired boilers with a particle control apparatus that is
newly constructed, installed or reconstructed. Owners/operators must
comply with the new particle emission rates unless otherwise specified
in an enforceable agreement with New Jersey. Note, particulates and
particles are synonymous terms.
The particulate emission rates in section 7:27-4.2(a) are unchanged
from emission rates in the current SIP approved Subchapter 4. The
emission rates listed in section 7:27-4.2(a) will no longer apply for
any coal-fired boiler or particulate control apparatus regulated by new
sections 7:27-4.2(b) or 7:27-4.2(c) on and after the required
compliance dates. The compliance date for sources subject to 7:27-
4.2(b) is May 19, 2009; the compliance date for sources subject to
7:27-4.2(c) is December 15, 2012.
The particulate emission rate listed in section 7:27-4.2(b) of
0.0150 pounds per million BTUs (MMBTU) shall apply for coal fired
boilers that have a particulate control apparatus that is newly
constructed, installed, reconstructed, and commences operation on or
after May 19, 2009. The owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance
based on the average of three stack tests, approved by New Jersey, and
in accordance with the source's approved permit. A coal-fired boiler or
particulate control apparatus is also subject, as applicable, to
existing New Jersey state-of-the-art requirements at 7:27-8.12 and
22:35, lowest achievable emission rate requirements at NJAC 7:27-18,
and best available control technology requirements at 40 CFR 52.21,
which are incorporated into the applicable implementation plan by
reference.
Unless regulated by 7:27-4.2(b), the particulate emission rate
listed in section 7:27-4.2(c) shall apply for coal fired boilers in
operation prior to May 19, 2009. Coal fired boilers are subject to an
emission rate limit of 0.0300 pounds per MMBTU, or the permitted
emission rate in effect as of May 19, 2009, whichever is lower. The
owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance based on the average of
three stack tests, approved by New Jersey, and in accordance with the
source's approved permit.
[[Page 21200]]
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to Subchapter
4, which further reduce particulate emissions in the State.
G. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 10--``Sulfur in
Solid Fuels?''
New Jersey previously submitted Subchapter 10 (state effective date
July 14, 1981) as a SIP revision and EPA approved it on November 3,
1981 (46 FR 54542). In this action, EPA is acting on amendments that
affect facilities that emit sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions
from solid fuel burning sources, including boilers serving electric
generating units (EGUs). The amendments include new definitions and
more stringent emission limits for SO2.
Section 10.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 10.1, Definitions to add and/or revise
terms and their definitions.
EPA evaluated New Jersey's definitions for consistency with the
Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy, and proposes to approve them.
Section 10.2 Sulfur Contents Standards
New Jersey amended section 10.2 of Subchapter 10 to require sources
to comply with more stringent SO2 emission rates contained
in section 7:27-10.2(h), and to eliminate the need to control
SO2 emissions by regulating the sulfur content of solid
fuel. Owners/operators must comply with the new SO2 emission
rates unless otherwise specified in an enforceable agreement with New
Jersey.
Section 7:27-10.2(a), which regulates the sulfur content of solid
fuel stored, offered for sale, sold, delivered or exchanged in trade,
for use in New Jersey, and section 7:27-10.2(b), which regulates the
sulfur content of solid fuel burned, will no longer apply to any source
after December 14, 2012. Additionally, existing section 7:27-10.2(c),
which required different emission standards based on the level of
SO2 nonattainment of a particular zone, will no longer apply
after December 14, 2012. Existing sections 7:27-10.2(d),(e), and (f),
which also regulate SO2 emissions based on the sulfur
content of fuel, and subsection (g), which applies to authorizations
granted pursuant to subsection (f), will also no longer apply after
December 14, 2012.
Pursuant to section 7:27-10.2(h), all sources that combust solid
fuel on or after December 15, 2012 must comply with the maximum
SO2 emission rate of 0.250 pounds/MMBtu gross heat input
based on a 24-hour emission rate and 0.150 pounds/MMBtu gross heat
input based on a 30-calendar-day rolling average emission rate. Any
source that combusts solid fuel, and that is constructed, installed,
reconstructed, or modified, is also subject, as applicable, to existing
New Jersey state-of-the-art requirements at 7:27-8.12 and 22:35, lowest
achievable emission rate requirements at NJAC 7:27-18, and best
available control technology requirements at 40 CFR 52.21, which are
incorporated into the applicable implementation plan by reference.
Pursuant to section 7:27-10.2(j), owners/operators of boilers may
request, from New Jersey, a one-year extension of the December 15, 2012
compliance deadline. Section 10.2(j) provides the necessary
administrative and procedural requirements for owners to submit an
extension request and the conditions under which New Jersey will
approve the extension request.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to this
existing provision, which address SO2 emissions from solid
fuel burning.
Section 10.5 SO2 Emission Rate Determinations
Section 10.5 of Subchapter 10 is a new provision that establishes
procedures for calculating the 24-hour and 30-calendar-day rolling
average emission rates for SO2 that are specified in
10.2(h).
SO2 emissions must be determined through the use of a
Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS). Section 10.5(c) allows
owners/operators to exclude emissions when the units are not combusting
solid fuel. Section 10.5(c)1 allows an exemption from the 30 calendar
day SO2 emission rate during the period of startup until the
unit begins combusting coal. Section 10.5(c)2 allows an exemption from
the 24-hour SO2 emission rate during the period of time that
the boiler does not combust coal. New Jersey provided for this
exemption to exclude emissions from periods when the boiler is
combusting fuel other than solid fuels, such as fuel oil or natural
gas, which can be burned during the start-up of coal fired boilers.
EPA supports these amendments and is proposing to approve them.
H. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 16: ``Control
and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic Compounds?''
New Jersey previously submitted Subchapter 16 (state effective date
October 17, 2005) as a SIP revision and EPA approved it on July 31,
2007 (72 FR 41626). In this action, EPA is acting on amendments to
Subchapter 16 that affect the following VOC sources or source
categories: VOC stationary storage tanks; sources subject to control
technique guidelines (CTGs) for flat wood paneling coatings, flexible
packaging printing materials and offset lithographic printing and
letterpress printing; sources subject to alternative or facility-
specific VOC control requirements; and asphalt used for paving;
Section 16.1 Definitions
New Jersey revised section 16.1, Definitions, to add and/or revise
terms and their definitions.
EPA evaluated New Jersey's definitions for consistency with the
Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
Section 16.2 VOC Stationary Storage Tanks
New Jersey has reevaluated the level of controls currently required
for stationary storage tanks that store VOC by studying controls that
have been successfully implemented in other states. The revisions
primarily affect those tanks in Range III which is the range that
covers larger tanks that store high vapor pressure VOC, such as
gasoline, located at refineries, terminals, and pipeline breakout
stations. The new requirements can be grouped into five categories:
deck fittings and seals, domes, roof landings, degassing and cleaning
operations, and inspection and maintenance procedures.
Deck Fittings and Seals
New Jersey revised section 16.2(l) to add provisions that require
roof penetrations, such as slotted guide poles, access hatches, and
adjustable roof legs to have seals, and require upgraded seals for
other deck fittings. In addition they provide more stringent rim seal
system requirements for existing and new storage tanks in Range III and
require roof openings to be maintained in a leak-free condition, as
determined by EPA Method 21 (40 CFR part 60, Appendix A).
Domes
New Jersey revised section 16.2(l) to require, with some
exceptions, that domes be installed on external floating roof tanks
that store materials with true vapor pressures greater than three pound
per square inch absolute (psia). Any tanks exempted from the
requirement of section 16.2(l) must still comply with other
requirements in section 16.2 for tanks in existence on May 18, 2009,
the day before the
[[Page 21201]]
operative date of these provisions. Compliance is required the first
time an existing tank is degassed following May 19, 2009, the operative
date of these revisions, but no later than May 1, 2020. A new tank is
required to comply before the tank is initially filled.
Roof Landings
Sections 16.2(n), (o), and (p) are new provisions that New Jersey
designed to minimize emissions when a tank goes through a ``roof
landing cycle.'' A roof landing cycle is composed of three phases: the
removal of all stored liquid VOC (the floating roof is no longer in
contact with the stored liquid VOC, but is supported by legs or
cables), the idling period (when the tank is waiting to be refilled),
and the refilling of the tank. Pursuant to 16.2(p)(1)(i), any floating
roof tank existing on May 19, 2009 and not exempt pursuant to
16.2(f)(6), must submit to NJDEP, by December 1, 2009, a complete,
written facility-wide tank VOC control plan. Pursuant to 16.2(p)(1)(ii)
any new tank, excluding those exempt pursuant to 16.2(f)(6), must
submit to NJDEP, by 120 days of installation, a written new or updated
facility-wide tank VOC control plan. Pursuant to 16.2(p)(2)(ii),
schedules for implementation of emission controls by May 19, 2019 are
to be consistent with the facility's schedule for tank removal from
service for normal inspection and maintenance and with the facility's
schedule for the installation of any new tanks. As an alternative to
the implementation schedule of emission controls, storage tanks in
Range III that store gasoline may submit an emissions averaging plan
pursuant to 16.2(p)2.iii.
Degassing and Cleaning Operations
Storage tanks must be periodically cleaned and accumulated sludge
removed. Before this can occur, tanks must be degassed (removal of
gases that remain after the liquid has been removed). Section 16.2(q)
is a new provision that contains requirements for handling the gases
and sludge that must be removed when a tank is degassed and cleaned
between May 1 and September 30. Compliance with these requirements
begins on May 1, 2010. Displaced vapors must be sent to a vapor control
system with at least 95 percent control efficiency. Section 16.2(q)
also contains approved methods for cleaning the inside of the tank.
Sludge from tanks that contained a VOC with a vapor pressure greater
than 1.5 psia (pounds per square inch absolute) must be transferred to
receiving vessels that are controlled to prevent 95 percent of the
emissions from being released to the atmosphere. Sludge containers must
be kept vapor tight and free from liquid leaks.
Inspection and Maintenance
Section 16.2(r) is a new provision that applies to VOC storage
tanks in Range III and requires that the tanks in this range be
inspected by an authorized inspector and the results recorded on an
inspection form (contained in Subchapter 16, Appendix II). Section
16.2(r) specifically identifies what must be annually inspected and
what must be inspected once a tank is degassed but not less than once
every 10 years. Any equipment that does not meet Subchapter 16
requirements must be repaired or replaced.
EPA evaluated the section 16.2 provisions for consistency with the
Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
Section 16.7 Surface Coating and Graphic Arts Operations
Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing
New Jersey revised section 16.7 to address the CTG for Offset
Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing. Subsections (r) and (s)
were added and require more stringent emission controls. Where more
resource intensive emission controls are necessary or involve modifying
the equipment, compliance is required by May 1, 2010. The VOC solvent
content of fountain solutions is limited depending on the type of
equipment and the limits must be complied with by May 19, 2009.
Cleaning materials are restricted to a composite vapor pressure less
than 10 mm Hg (millimeters mercury) or VOC content of less than 70
percent by weight with some exceptions after May 19, 2009.
In addition, section 16.7(t) was added and requires, effective May
19, 2009, best management practices, such as, keeping VOC and VOC
containing materials in closed containers, ensuring mixing vessels have
covers and are kept closed when not adding or removing materials,
keeping VOC containing shop towels in closed containers, and
recordkeeping requirements. The above changes are consistent with the
CTG recommendations issued on October 5, 2006.
EPA evaluated these provisions for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
Flexible Package Printing
The New Jersey amendments to section 16.7 address the CTG for
Flexible Package Printing. Section 16.7(h)(3) was added and requires
more stringent emission controls for rotogravure, sheet-fed gravure, or
flexographic printing operations installed or modified on or after May
19, 2010. Section 16.7, Table 7D -Part B contains new maximum allowable
VOC content of surface coating formulations (minus water) limits.
Section 16.7(t) requires best management practices (see above
description). These amendments are consistent with the CTG
recommendations issued on October 5, 2006.
EPA evaluated these provisions for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
Flat Wood Paneling and Printed Hardwood Coatings
The New Jersey amendments to section 16.7 address the CTG for Flat
Wood Paneling and Printed Hardwood Coatings. Section 16.7, Table 7B
contains new maximum allowable VOC content per volume of coating (minus
water) limits for flat wood paneling and printed hardwood coatings of
2.1 pounds per gallon with a compliance date of May 19, 2009. Section
16.7(t) requires best management practices (see above description).
The amendments to section 16.7 are consistent with the CTG
recommendations issued on October 5, 2006. EPA has evaluated these
provisions for consistency with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA
policy and proposes to approve them.
Section 16.11 Asphalt Pavement Production Plants
The New Jersey amendments to section 16.11 clarify that it applies
to plants where asphalt pavement is produced. There were no changes to
the requirements.
EPA evaluated this provision for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve it.
Section 16.17 Alternative and Facility-Specific VOC Control
Requirements
The New Jersey amendments to section 16.17 limit the duration of an
approved VOC alternative control plan to ten years. Section 16.17(c)5
provides that, for control plans issued after May 19, 2009, sources can
reapply for a new plan the year before the existing alternate control
plan expires. Sources with VOC control plans issued prior to May 19,
2009 must reapply and demonstrate continued justification or comply
with the specific Subchapter 16 requirements for that source. If the
source does not submit a proposed plan
[[Page 21202]]
by August 17, 2009, the existing plan terminates on August 17, 2009 and
the source must comply with all applicable provisions of Subchapter 16.
All alternative control plans must be submitted by the State to EPA for
approval as a revision to the SIP.
EPA has evaluated these provisions for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
Section 16.19 Application of Cutback and Emulsified Asphalts
The New Jersey amendments to section 16.19 further reduce the
amount of VOC that is allowed to be included in cutback asphalt or
emulsified asphalt used between April 16 through October 14 to no
greater than 0.1 percent VOC by weight or no greater than 6.0
milliliters of oil distillate, in accordance with ASTM Method D244,
Standard Test Methods and Practices for Emulsified Asphalts, or AASHTO
T 59, Standard Method of Test for Testing Emulsified Asphalts. In
addition, it requires cutback asphalt or emulsified asphalt to be
stored in sealed containers from April 16 through October 14. Both
these requirements are applicable as of April 16, 2009. EPA evaluated
these provisions for consistency with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA
policy and proposes to approve them.
Other Changes to Subchapter 16
In addition to the above, New Jersey modified Subchapter 16 to make
technical and administrative corrections, to delete outdated
provisions, such as the repealed Open Market Emissions Trading Program,
and to clarify the use of terms in section 16.17.
EPA evaluated these provisions for consistency with the Act, EPA
regulations, and EPA policy and proposes to approve them.
I. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Subchapter 19 ``Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution From Oxides of Nitrogen?''
The following is a summary of EPA's evaluation of New Jersey's
April 21, 2009 SIP submittal consisting of new provisions and
amendments to existing provisions to Subchapters 19.
New Jersey previously submitted Subchapter 19 as a SIP revision to
address the NOX RACT requirements, which EPA approved as SIP
revisions on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3804), March 29, 1999 (64 FR
14832) and July 31, 2007 (72 FR 41626). New Jersey also developed a
NOX Budget Trading Program, which EPA approved as a SIP
revision on May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28063), and the Clean Air Interstate
Rule (CAIR) program, which EPA approved as a SIP revision on October 1,
2007 (72 FR 55666). The current submission provides new provisions and
amendments that establish more stringent RACT limits for facilities
that emit NOX. New Jersey revised Subchapter 19 to require
owners and operators to implement the following new provisions and
amendments to existing provisions:
1. New Provisions
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incinerators
Section 19.12 of Subchapter 19 is a new provision that establishes
a NOX emission limit, compliance monitoring requirements and
compliance dates for any size MSW incinerator. The new NOX
emission limit is 150 parts per million measured on a dry volume basis
(ppmvd) at 7% oxygen, averaged over a calendar day is set forth in
section 19.12(a). If the NOX emission limit cannot be
achieved, section 19.12(b) provides that owners/operators of the MSW
incinerator can comply by obtaining an alternative maximum allowable
NOX emission rate pursuant to section 19.13 of Subchapter
19. In accordance with section 19.13(h), any State approved alternative
maximum allowable NOX emission limit pursuant to 19.13(c) or
NOX control plan pursuant to 19.13(b) must be submitted by
New Jersey to EPA for approval as a SIP revision. Section 19.12(c)
provides that compliance with the NOX limit is to be
demonstrated with a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS),
pursuant to section 19.18 of Subchapter 19. Compliance is due by July
18, 2009 if achieved by optimization of an existing NOX air
pollution control system (APCS) without modifying the incinerator,
however the date is extended to May 1, 2011 if compliance must be
achieved by installing a NOX APCS or if it is necessary to
physically modify the incinerator.
The NOX emission limit of 150 ppmvd is more stringent
than the federal limits currently in effect for existing large and
small MSW incinerators (see 40 CFR Part 62, Subparts FFF and JJJ) and
is more stringent than the limits previously approved by EPA as source-
specific SIP revisions submitted by New Jersey, pursuant to section
19.13 of Subchapter 19.
EPA supports these new provisions and is proposing to approve them.
Sewage Sludge Incinerators
Section 19.28 of Subchapter 19 is a new provision that establishes
NOX emission limits and compliance requirements for sewage
sludge incinerators. Section 19.28(a) provides that the NOX
emission limit is 7.0 pounds NOX per ton of dry sewage
sludge for Multiple Hearth type incinerators and 2.5 pounds
NOX per ton of dry sewage sludge for Fluidized Bed type
incinerators, unless the owner/operator is complying with alternative
compliance options at section 19.3(f) of Subchapter 19. The
NOX emission limit of 7.0 pounds NOX per ton of
dry sewage sludge for Multiple Hearth type incinerators is more
stringent than the limits previously approved by EPA as source-specific
SIP revisions submitted by New Jersey, pursuant to section 19.13 of
Subchapter 19. EPA did not previously receive any source-specific SIP
revisions from New Jersey for Fluidized Bed type sewage sludge
incinerators.
Pursuant to section 19.15(a) of Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
sewage sludge incinerators must demonstrate compliance with either a
CEMS or source emission tests. Pursuant to sections 19.15(b) and (c),
owners/operators shall meet the following compliance demonstration
dates: (1) For a source that was in operation before January 1, 1995,
compliance is to be demonstrated at the frequency set forth in the
permit for the equipment; and (2) for a source that commenced operation
or is altered after January 1, 1995, initial compliance is to be
demonstrated within 180 days of when the source commences operation.
Pursuant to section 19.3(f) of Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
sewage sludge incinerators may comply by using one of the alternative
options listed in 19.3(f)(1)-(4) or a combination of options (1) and
(3). The options in section 19.3(f) are: (1) An emissions averaging
plan approved by New Jersey pursuant to sections 19.6 and 19.14; (2) an
alternative maximum allowable NOX emission rate approved by
New Jersey pursuant to section 19.13; (3) a plan for seasonal fuel
switching approved by New Jersey pursuant to sections 19.14 and 19.20;
and (4) a plan for phased compliance through the use of either
repowering approved by New Jersey pursuant to section 19.21 or
innovative control technology approved by New Jersey pursuant to
section 19.23. In accordance with New Jersey's requirements for phased
compliance through the use of either repowering or innovative control
technology, owners/operators were required to have applied
[[Page 21203]]
to implement a plan by February 7, 2006 and to have fully implemented
the plans by November 7, 2009. Since the New Jersey compliance
deadlines have past, unless already fully implemented by November 7,
2009, these two phased compliance plan options are no longer available
as control options.
When Subchapter 19 was last approved, EPA stated that it takes no
action to either approve or disapprove the existing provisions for
phased compliance using repowering or innovative control technology at
sections 19.21 and 19.23, respectively, because they contain a
compliance date of November 7, 2009, which was beyond the 1-hour ozone
attainment date deadline. See 72 FR 41626, July 31, 2007. EPA continues
to take no action on the phased compliance provisions at sections 19.21
and 19.23, which are no longer viable control options, and requests New
Jersey to delete this date which has now passed the next time
Subchapter 19 is revised.
EPA supports these changes and is proposing to approve this new
provision.
High Electric Demand Days (HEDD) Electric Generating Units (EGUs)
Sections 19.29 and 30 of Subchapter 19 are new provisions that
establish a short term and a long term control strategy, respectively,
for limiting NOX emissions on ``HEDD'' and establishing, as
applicable, recordkeeping, reporting, and monitoring requirements for
EGUs operating on HEDD which are typically days during the summer
months when both temperatures and ozone levels can be high. Section
19.1 defines a ``HEDD unit'' as an EGU, capable of generating 15
megawatts or more, that commenced operation prior to May 1, 2005, and
that operated less than or equal to an average of 50 percent of the
time during the ozone seasons of 2005 through 2007.\1\ Section 19.1
defines an HEDD as a day on which the generating load is forecast by
the PJM Interconnection \2\ to have a peak value of 52,000 megawatts or
higher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ HEDD units can include some stationary gas turbines and some
boilers.
\2\ PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission organization
(RTO) that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all
or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia, including the
State of New Jersey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19.29 of Subchapter 19, contains the short term strategy to
achieve NOX reductions from HEDD units starting on May 19,
2009 through September 30, 2014 thereby providing owners/operators of
affected units time to develop and implement the long term strategy
pursuant to section 19.30, which requires compliance with the more
stringent NOX emission limits at amended sections 19.4 and
19.5 for boilers and combustion turbines, respectively. HEDD units
applicable to section 19.29 are old units that typically emit high
levels of NOX on HEDD.
The short term strategy is based upon a March 2, 2007 Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) \3\ signed by New Jersey and the other member
states of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC). This MOU commits New
Jersey to reduce NOX emissions associated with HEDD units by
19.8 tons per day (TPD) on high electric demand days. Pursuant to
section 19.29(b), this short term strategy requires owners/operators of
HEDD units to do the following: (1) By June 18, 2009, submit to New
Jersey an approvable ``2009 Protocol'' that defines all of the control
measures pursuant to section 19.29(d) needed to achieve its share of
the statewide NOX emission reductions from HEDD units, on
each HEDD day during the period May 19, 2009 through September 30,
2014, as determined by `Equation 1' of section 19.29(c); (2) provide a
demonstration that all the required NOX reductions were
obtained and include a demonstration in an annual report, pursuant to
section 19.29(k); and (3) submit the annual report to New Jersey by
January 30th of the following year, pursuant to section 19.29(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Memorandum of Understanding Among the States of the Ozone
Transport Commission Concerning the Incorporation of High Electric
Demand Day Emission Reduction Strategies into Ozone Attainment State
Implementation Planning''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The short term strategy also defines the applicability of the rule
to specific affected sources, provides for recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, provides detailed compliance requirements of an
approvable 2009 Protocol, and establishes permitting requirements.
It should be noted that pursuant to section 19.29(b)(3) of New
Jersey's short term strategy, owners/operators of subject HEDD units
may request the State's approval of a phased compliance plan, pursuant
to section 19.22, which provides an additional year for compliance with
the required NOX reductions due to impracticality. During
the interim period, section 19.22(g)(4) requires owners/operators of an
approved phased compliance plan to control NOX emissions
either by adjusting the combustion process or seasonally combusting
natural gas, pursuant to section 19.20, or implementing other control
measures that New Jersey determines are appropriate.
In addition to meeting the NOX reductions, (tons/HEDD)
as provided in Equation 1, for the period from May 20, 2009 through
April 30, 2015 owners/operators of HEDD units that are stationary
combustion turbines are also required to meet a specific NOX
emission limit (expressed as lbs/MMBTU), pursuant to section 19.5, as
follows: (1) Table 4 emission limits apply for simple cycle combustion
turbines; and (2) Table 5 emission limits apply for combined cycle or
regenerative cycle combustion turbines.
New Jersey's long term NOX reduction strategy provided
in section 19.30 of Subchapter 19 addresses requirements for owners/
operators of HEDD units meeting new NOX emission limits
starting in 2015 and beyond. As stated above, the new more stringent
NOX emission limits, for boilers and combustion turbines,
respectively, are provided in the new amendments in sections 19.4 and
19.5. Owners/operators of HEDD units are required to submit to New
Jersey a ``2015 HEDD Emission Limit Achievement Plan'' (``2015 Plan'')
by May 1, 2010. The purpose of the 2015 Plan is to document how the
owner/operator intends to comply with the 2015 HEDD NOX
emission limits and to provide a schedule by which the new emission
limits will be achieved for each HEDD unit. Owners/operators of HEDD
units are required to submit to New Jersey an annual update on the
progress of the 2015 Plan for each calendar year from 2010 through
2014. Owners/operators of HEDD units are required to indicate any
obstacles that might impede progress in achieving compliance with the
applicable 2015 NOX emission limit and any steps needed to
overcome these obstacles in their annual updates.
EPA supports the new provisions, which address NOX
reductions from HEDD units and proposes to approve them.
2. Amendments to Existing Provisions
Boilers Serving Electric Generating Units (EGUs)
New Jersey revised section 19.4 of Subchapter 19 by lowering the
current SIP approved NOX emission rates, and by providing
new compliance dates, as summarized in Tables 1-3 of Subchapter 19, for
boilers serving EGUs. Owners/operators must comply with the new
NOX emission rates unless they are complying with the
alternative compliance options in section 19.3(f) \4\
[[Page 21204]]
or unless otherwise specified in an enforceable agreement with New
Jersey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Whenever EPA refers to section 19.3(f), the reader is
referred to the discussion at section I.I.1 of this rulemaking
relating to sewage sludge incinerators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NOX emission rates in Table 1 of the amendments are
the same as the emission rates in the current SIP approved Subchapter
19 and are required to be complied with until December 14, 2012. For
coal boilers, the NOX emission rates in Tables 2 and 3 are
lowered to 1.5 pounds per megawatt hour (lb/MWh), resulting in
additional NOX reductions ranging from about 75 percent to
85 percent, depending upon the boiler type, and the operative
compliance date is December 15, 2012. New Jersey revised the
NOX emission rates from heat input based rates (pounds per
MMBTU) in Table 1 to the production output based rates (lb/MWh)
provided in Tables 2 and 3. Output based limits encourage sources to
improve plant operating efficiency and encourage pollution prevention
measures, such as clean energy supply, which result in reduced fuel
consumption and reduced emission of pollutants, including
NOX.
When calculating a 24-hour NOX emission rate for coal
combustion at a coal boiler, section 19.4 allows owners/operators to
exclude emissions during startup and shutdown under the following
restricted conditions: (1) For startup, when the unit is not combusting
fossil fuel (coal), for a period not to exceed 8 hours, from initial
combustion until the unit combusts coal and is synchronized with a
utility electric distribution system; and (2) for shutdown, when the
unit is no longer combusting coal and no longer synchronized with a
utility electric distribution system. New Jersey provided for this
exemption because of technological limitations: Selective catalytic
reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) control
technologies do not control NOX emissions effectively at
lower than optimum temperatures that can occur during startup and
shutdown periods. EPA is in agreement with New Jersey's exemption for
the following reasons: (1) The impact on ambient air quality is
minimized by New Jersey's narrowly defined startup and shutdown
requirements; (2) the exemption only applies during startup and
shutdown periods when coal is not combusted; (3) the NOX
control strategies have technological limitations during startup and
shutdown periods; and (4) New Jersey requires compliance with oil/gas
NOX emission limits during this startup/shutdown period.
This startup/shutdown exemption is consistent with EPA's guidance as
discussed in the TSD.
For oil and gas boilers, the NOX emission rates provided
in section 19.4, Table 3, expressed as lb/MWh, are more stringent as
follows: (1) 2.0 for boilers combusting heavier than No. 2 fuel oil,
resulting in additional NOX reductions as high as 53
percent, depending upon the boiler type; and (2) 1.0 for boilers
combusting either No. 2 and lighter fuel oil or gas only, resulting in
additional NOX reductions ranging from about 50 percent to
76 percent, depending upon the boiler type.
The operative compliance date for oil and gas fired boilers that
are subject to the new NOX emission rates in Table 3 is May
1, 2015.
Pursuant to section 19.4(f) of Subchapter 19, owners/operators of
coal-fired boilers may request from New Jersey a one-year extension of
both the December 15, 2012 emission limit compliance deadline and the
June 15, 2013 compliance demonstration deadline required at section
19.4(d)(1). Section 19.4(f) provides the necessary administrative and
procedural requirements for owners to submit an extension request and
the conditions under which New Jersey will approve the extension
request.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP-approved provision as they provide for further NOX
reductions from boilers serving EGUs.
Stationary Combustion Turbines
New Jersey revised section 19.5 of Subchapter 19 to lower the
current SIP approved NOX emission rates and to provide
compliance dates for stationary combustion turbines, as summarized in
Tables 4-7 of Subchapter 19. The NOX emission rates in
Tables 4 through 6 are the same as the emission rates in the current
SIP approved Subchapter 19.
Table 7 is applicable to all HEDD unit stationary combustion
turbines or stationary combustion turbines capable of generating 15 MW
or more that commenced operation on or after May 1, 2005. The
NOX emission rates in Table 7 are more stringent, by
approximately 40 to 54 percent, depending upon the type of turbine and
fuel combusted, than the current Table 6 SIP approved NOX
emission rates. Owners/operators of affected units must comply with the
Table 7 NOX emission rates on and after May 1, 2015.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision as they provide for further NOX
reductions from stationary combustion turbines.
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers and Other Indirect
Heat Exchangers (IHEs)
New Jersey revised section 19.7 of Subchapter 19 by lowering the
current SIP approved maximum allowable NOX emission rates,
by providing compliance dates, and by lowering the applicability
threshold for ICI boilers and other IHEs. The more stringent
requirements at section 19.7 do not apply to ICI boilers and other IHEs
at petroleum refineries. Owners/operators must comply with the
NOX emission rates unless they are complying with the
alternative compliance options in section 19.3(f) (see footnote 4).
The NOX emission rates in the new Table 9 are more
stringent than the current SIP approved rates in Table 8 and are
applicable to owners/operators of ICI boilers and IHEs, whether or not
the source is located at a facility classified as major for
NOX, for those sources that are not located at a petroleum
refinery. Newly applicable sources are required to be in compliance
with the new limits as follows: (1) The applicability threshold is
lowered, for sources with a heat input rate expressed as lb/MMBTU, to
25 from 50 lb/MMBTU and (2) the applicability of these provisions is
extended to ICI boilers and IHEs not located at a facility classified
as major for NOX. The new NOX emission rates are
lowered as much as 77%, depending upon the boiler type and/or fuel
combusted. The State has indicated there are no longer any coal-fired
boilers in operation. Therefore it has deleted the requirement to
comply with these NOX emission rates for the source category
``coal-fired boilers.'' For sources with a heat input rate of at least
25 MMBTU/hr but less than 50 MMBTU/hr, compliance with the Table 9
NOX emission rates are required on and after (1) May 1, 2011
if compliance is achieved without physically modifying the boiler or
IHE and (2) May 1, 2012 for sources that comply by a physical
modification. For sources with a heat input rate of at least 50 MMBTU/
hr, compliance with the Table 9 NOX emission rates is
required on and after (1) May 1, 2010 if compliance is achieved without
physically modifying the boiler or IHE and (2) May 1, 2011 for sources
that comply by a physical modification.
For ICI boilers and IHEs located at petroleum refineries, the
current SIP approved NOx emission rates in Table 8 are still
applicable.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP-approved provision as the amendments provide for further
NOX
[[Page 21205]]
reductions from ICI boilers and other IHEs.
Asphalt Pavement Production Plants
New Jersey revised section 19.9 of Subchapter 19 by lowering the
current SIP approved maximum allowable NOX emission limit
for dryers at asphalt production plants, by providing new compliance
dates, and by requiring implementation and recordkeeping associated
with new best management practices. The NOX emission limits
are lowered, in the range of 37 to 67 percent, from 200 ppmvd, as
measured at 7 percent oxygen, to more stringent limits depending upon
the fuel combusted in the dryer. The new NOX emission limits
are as follows: (1) 75 ppmvd for natural gas combustion; (2) 100 ppmvd
for No. 2 fuel oil combustion; and (3) 125 ppmvd for No. 4 fuel oil,
heavier fuel oil, on-specification used oil or any mixture of these
three oils. Owners/operators must comply with the NOX
emission limits unless they are complying with the alternative
compliance options in section 19.3(f) (see footnote 4). In addition,
owners/operators must annually adjust the combustion process of the
dryer pursuant to section 19.16 of Subchapter 19.
Owners/operators of an asphalt pavement production plant that are
complying without physically modifying the dryer must be in compliance
with the new NOX emission limits by the following dates: (1)
By May 1, 2011, for sources with a heat input rate of less than 100
MMBTU/hr and (2) by May 1, 2010, for sources with a heat input rate of
at least 100 MMBTU/hr. For owners/operators of sources that must make
physical modifications to comply, the compliance date is extended one
year for each of the scenarios above.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision that addresses NOX reductions from
asphalt pavement production plants.
Glass Manufacturing Furnaces
New Jersey revised section 19.10 of Subchapter 19 by lowering the
current SIP approved NOX emission limits by approximately 27
to 64 percent, by adding new applicable source categories, and by
providing compliance dates for glass manufacturing furnaces having the
potential to emit more than 10 tons of NOX per year. The new
NOX emission limits for glass manufacturing furnaces subject
to the provisions are either 4.0 or 9.2 tons NOX per ton of
glass removed from the furnace, depending upon the type of glass
produced and the production rate of the glass furnace. The amendments
applicable to glass manufacturing furnaces that produce pressed glass,
blown glass, fiberglass and flat glass are now regulated by section
19.10.
Pursuant to section 19.10(f), in lieu of meeting the NOX
emission limits at sections 19.10(a) and (b), owners/operators of glass
manufacturing furnaces may comply by using the alternative compliance
options at section 19.10(f), which parallel those for sewage sludge
incinerators at 19.3(f) (see footnote 4), except that the alternative
compliance option for innovative control technology and the phased
compliance by repowering are not allowed by New Jersey.
Owners/operators of glass manufacturing furnaces are required to be
in compliance with the new NOX emission limits on and after
May 1, 2010. Based on economic considerations, compliance with the
amendments is required on the first day of startup after rebricking of
the furnace occurs. Since economic feasibility is one of the RACT
requirements, New Jersey's compliance requirement is acceptable to EPA.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision that addresses NOX reductions from
glass manufacturing furnaces.
Alternative and Facility-Specific NOX Emission Limits (AELs
and FSELs)
Section 19.13 of Subchapter 19 establishes a procedure for making
case-by-case RACT determinations for facilities classified as major for
NOX, for an item of equipment, or for a source operation.
Owners/operators of major NOX facilities with emission
sources having a potential to emit of more than 10 tons of
NOX per year, where no previous presumptive NOX
emission limit has been established in Subchapter 19, are required to
apply to New Jersey for a facility-specific emission limit (FSEL).
Where a presumptive NOX emission limit exists in Subchapter
19 and owners/operators determine that the presumptive NOX
limit cannot be met by the source, the owners/operators can apply to
New Jersey, pursuant to the procedures in section 19.13, for an
alternative emission limit (AEL). FSELs and AELs are determined on a
case-by-case basis. Pursuant to section 19.13(h), any FSEL or AEL
approved by New Jersey must be submitted by the State to EPA for
approval as a revision to the SIP. If EPA denies the approval of the
proposed NOX plan as a revision to the SIP, section 19.13(l)
provides that New Jersey will revoke its approval of the plan.
Section 19.13 is amended by requiring owners/operators of each
facility with either an FSEL or an AEL that was issued by New Jersey
before May 1, 2005 to submit a new NOX control plan by
August 17, 2009 unless a 90-day extension is requested and approved by
the State. Pursuant to section 19.13(b)(1), any FSEL approved by New
Jersey after May 19, 2009 will not have an expiration date unless there
is a modification, alteration or reconstruction of the source, for
which the State's approval of a new FSEL is required. Pursuant to
section 19.13(b)(2) any AEL approved by New Jersey will have a term
limit of 10 years. An approval of an AEL is void upon alteration of the
equipment or source operation, unless New Jersey determines that the
alteration does not materially affect the basis of the original
approval or the source, prior to the alteration, applies for and
obtains a revised AEL (see sections 19.13(b)(6) and 19.13(k)). New
Jersey made these amendments after its review of existing FSELs and
AELs many of which were approved as long ago as 1997. In many cases,
the State determined that control technologies have advanced
sufficiently since that time, warranting reevaluations of these case-
by-case determinations.
EPA supports and proposes to approve the amendments to the current
SIP approved provision as they will lead to potential NOX
reductions from specific-sources.
3. Additional Amendments to Subchapter 19
New Jersey adopted a number of other amendments since EPA last
approved amendments to Subchapter 19 (72 FR 41626, July 31, 2007).
Among other things, these amendments (1) Revised terms and definitions
that do not change the meaning or stringency of the provisions; (2)
revised section 19.2 to expand the list of the following applicable
source categories: Certain glass manufacturing furnaces, any municipal
solid waste incinerator, and any sewage sludge incinerator; (3) revised
section 19.3 to exclude owners/operators of HEDD units from using
alternative compliance options at section 19.3(f), beginning on May 1,
2015; and (4) deleted the entire provision at section 19.27 that
referred to New Jersey's now defunct Open Market Trading Program at
Subchapter 30 that was repealed in 2004.
[[Page 21206]]
4. Compliance Dates
New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 by including new provisions and
amendments to previously approved SIP provisions that result in more
stringent NOX emission limitations that will lead to
additional reductions in NOX emissions from the affected
major stationary combustion sources.
New Jersey uses the emission benefits from the new provisions and
amendments to Subchapter 19 in a variety of ways in the SIP. Some are
used to meet reasonable further progress goals, others as a contingency
measure should an area fail to attain the 1997 ozone standard, some to
support the ``weight of evidence'' arguments concerning attainment of
the 1997 ozone standard, and others that will be used to help to attain
the new 2008 ozone standard (currently under reconsideration) that New
Jersey anticipates will replace the 1997 ozone standard. In addition,
New Jersey was seeking to fulfill the section 182(b)(2) and section
172(c)(1) requirements for RACT as applied to both the 1997 and 2008
ozone standards in setting the emission standards and compliance due
dates.
Emission reductions required by sections 182(b)(2) and 172(c)(1) of
the Act, used to fulfill in the 1997 ozone SIP, are required to be
achieved by May 2009. Sources with compliance periods that go beyond
May 2009 are use