Plan Revision for Kaibab National Forest; Coconino, Yavapai, and Mojave Counties; AZ, 21221-21223 [2010-9425]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
more information regarding this
meeting, contact Connie Athman; Mt.
Hood National Forest; 16400 Champion
Way; Sandy, Oregon 97055; (503) 668–
1672.
Dated: April 16, 2010.
Gary L. Larsen,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–9298 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Plan Revision for Kaibab National
Forest; Coconino, Yavapai, and Mojave
Counties; AZ
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to revise the
forest plan.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As directed by the National
Forest Management Act (NFMA), the
USDA Forest Service is revising the
Kaibab National Forest Land
Management Plan (forest plan) and will
also prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the revised forest
plan. This notice briefly describes the
nature of the decision to be made, the
proposed action and need for change,
and information concerning public
participation. It also provides estimated
dates for filing the EIS and the names
and addresses of the responsible agency
official and the individuals who can
provide additional information. Finally,
this notice briefly describes the
applicable planning rule and how work
done on the plan revision under the
2008 planning rule will be used or
modified for completing this plan
revision.
The revised Kaibab National Forest
Land Management Plan will supersede
the forest plan approved by the Regional
Forester on April 15, 1988, amended
eight times from 1988 to 2009. Two of
the eight amendments were site specific,
involving the reclassification of suitable
timberlands to non-forest lands. The
other six amendments were
programmatic; two clarified procedures,
one incorporated direction for the
Regional amendment of Forest plans
(goshawk, spotted owl, and old growth),
one incorporated direction for wildfire
use, one adopted the Recreation
Opportunity Spectrum and Scenery
Management System for the Tusayan
and Williams Ranger Districts, and one
incorporated direction for the treatment
of noxious and invasive weeds. This
amended forest plan will remain in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
effect until the revised forest plan takes
effect.
DATES: Comments concerning the need
for change provided in this notice will
be most useful in the development of
the draft revised plan and draft
environmental impact statement if
received by June 1, 2010. The agency
expects to release a draft revised plan
and draft environmental impact
statement for formal comment by fall
2010 and a final revised plan and final
environmental impact statement by
summer 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Kaibab National Forest, Attention:
Forest Plan Revision Team, 800 S. 6th
St., Williams, Arizona 86046. Comments
may also be sent via e-mail to
southwestern-kaibab@fs.fed.us or via
facsimile to (928) 635–8208, with
‘‘Forest Plan Revision’’ in the subject
line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ariel Leonard, Forest Planner, Kaibab
National Forest at (928) 635–8283 or
e-mail: aleonard@fs.fed.us. Information
on this revision is also available at the
Kaibab National Forest revision Web
site at https://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/
plan_revision or by request. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Time Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Name and Address of the Responsible
Official
The responsible official is Corbin
Newman, Regional Forester,
Southwestern Region, 333 Broadway
SE., Albuquerque, NM 87102.
Nature of the Decision To Be Made
The EIS process is meant to inform
the Regional Forester so that he can
decide which forest plan alternative best
meets the need to achieve quality land
management under the sustainable
multiple-use management concept, meet
the diverse needs of people, and
conserve the National Forest’s
resources, as required by the NFMA and
the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act
(MUSYA). The new forest plan will
describe the strategic intent of managing
the Kaibab National Forest into the next
10 to 15 years and will address the need
for change described below. The new
forest plan will provide management
direction in the form of goals (desired
conditions), objectives, suitability
determinations, standards, guidelines,
and a monitoring plan, including the
identification of management indicator
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21221
species (MIS). It may also make new
special area recommendations for
wilderness, or other special areas.
As important as the decisions to be
made is the identification of the types
of decisions that will not be made
within the revised forest plan. The
authorization of project-level activities
on the forests is not a decision made in
the forest plan but occurs through
subsequent project specific decisionmaking. The designation of routes,
trails, and areas for motorized vehicle
travel are not considered during plan
revision, but are being addressed in
concurrent, but separate, environmental
assessments for motorized travel
management planning on the Williams,
Tusayan, and North Kaibab Ranger
Districts. Some issues (e.g., hard rock
mining on public domain lands),
although important, are beyond the
authority or control of the Kaibab
National Forest and will not be
considered. In addition, some issues,
such as restoring cottonwood willow
riparian forests, may not be undertaken
at this time, but addressed later as
future forest plan amendments.
Need for Change and Proposed Action
Since the forest plan was approved in
1988, there has been a shift in
management emphasis from outputs to
outcomes, new scientific information
and understanding, and changes in
economic, social, and ecological
conditions. The Analysis of the
Management Situation (AMS) and
subsequent management reviews
identified four priority needs that will
serve to focus the scope of this plan
revision. These topics reflect the
priority needs for change and potential
changes in program direction that will
be emphasized in the development of
the revised forest plan:
1. Modify stand structure and density
of forested ecosystems towards reference
conditions and restore historic fire
regimes. The multiple ecological, social,
and economic benefits of reducing the
risk of uncharacteristic fires made this
a primary area of focus. The revised
Forest Plan will define desired
characteristics including: Species
composition; structural characteristics
such as spacing tree groups and tree
density; and disturbance patterns such
as frequency, severity, intensity, and
size and fire. It will also describe the
strategies in the form of objectives,
guidelines that will define the ‘‘when’’,
‘‘where’’, and ‘‘how’’ to achieve the
desired conditions. Objectives will
focus on restoration activities such as
thinning and burning in high priority
areas. Guidelines and standards will
serve to provide direction to focus and
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
21222
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
constrain vegetation management
activities.
2. Protect and regenerate aspen. The
protection and regeneration of aspen is
a priority because of the important role
aspen plays in providing local habitat
diversity and scenery. Aspen stands are
currently in decline throughout most of
the southwest. On the Williams Ranger
District, most aspen stands are generally
unhealthy because they are being
overtopped by conifers and there has
been little to no recruitment of young
trees due to heavy browsing by Rocky
Mountain elk. The revised Forest Plan
will define desired characteristics for
aspen including regeneration,
recruitment, structural composition,
understory plants, and disturbance
processes. Strategies for achieving
desired conditions will focus on
thinning encroaching conifers,
protection from browse, and the
reintroduction of fire.
3. Protect natural waters. The Kaibab
National Forest is one of the driest
Forests in the Nation. With the
exception of one perennial stream that
is less than 2 miles in length, most of
the natural waters are small springs and
ephemeral wetlands. The current forest
plan offers little guidance for managing
these rare and ecologically important
resources. Natural waters are centers of
high biological diversity, have
traditional cultural significance, and are
popular recreation destinations. The
revised forest plan will provide desired
conditions and include strategies to
restore and protect natural waters. This
work is relatively inexpensive and
would provide important ecological and
social benefits.
4. Restore grasslands by reducing tree
encroachment in grasslands and
meadows. Tree encroachment into
grasslands has reduced the amount of
grasslands significantly over the past
100 years. This reduction has reduced
the amount and quality of available
habitat for grassland-associated species.
The montane/subalpine grasslands on
the North Kaibab Ranger District are at
a higher risk of loss because they are
linear and encroachment occurs more
quickly. Desired conditions for
grasslands will include desired natural
patterns of abundance, composition,
and distribution. Strategies will focus
on reducing tree density, restoring fire
to the ecosystem, and modifying fences
that would improve habitat connectivity
for pronghorn antelope.
In addition to the priority needs for
change topics above, this forest plan
revision process will develop
consistent, efficient, and scientificallybased plan components to provide
direction for: (1) A balanced range of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
recreation opportunities within the
limits of the administrative and resource
capacity; (2) management response in
the years immediately following large
disturbance events; (3) energy corridors
and renewable energy development
requests; (4) mining exploration and
development; (5) special-use
management; and (6) special forest
products collection. Additionally, the
Forest will review the results of the
Wilderness Needs Assessment and the
eligibility of Kanab Creek Wild and
Scenic River. Other needs for change
have been and will continue to be
identified. These may be addressed in
the proposed forest plan, or
incorporated in the future as
amendments.
Public Involvement
Extensive public involvement and
collaboration has already taken place.
The Kaibab National Forest has hosted
multiple general public meetings in
Williams, Tusayan, Flagstaff, Phoenix,
Fredonia (all in Arizona) and in Kanab,
Utah, as well as focused meetings on
ecological sustainability and special
areas. There was also a series of
facilitated collaborative stakeholder
meetings, supported by spatial modeling
and analysis that were designed to
identify high-priority treatment areas
and provide guidance for restoring fire
adapted ecosystems. The Kaibab
National Forest also hosted five topicbased ‘‘collaborwriting’’ sessions and an
on-line discussion forum that focused
on drafting desired conditions and
guidance for grasslands, springs/
wetlands, aspen, mixed conifer forests,
and recreation. Consultation and
collaboration with American Indian
Tribes has been ongoing, with multiple
government to government meetings
with the Hopi, Navajo, Hualapai,
Havasupai, Zuni, and Kaibab-Paiute
Tribes. The Kaibab forest plan revision
was also a topic at several multitribe
and Navajo Chapters meetings.
Based on the collaborative process
and other input received to date, a
working draft of the Kaibab National
Forest Land Management Plan has been
prepared and is available at https://
fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/draft_plan for
review and comment. The working draft
is meant to provide a foundation for
continued collaborative discussion and
feedback before the proposed action/
preferred alternative has been finalized.
The information received in response to
this notice of intent will be used to
make additions and modifications
needed to finalize the proposed forest
plan, identify issues and potential
alternatives, and guide the analysis of
environmental effects.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the revised
forest plan and EIS. Therefore,
comments on the proposed action and
need for change will be most valuable
if received by June 1, 2010, and should
clearly articulate the reviewer’s
concerns.
Following the preparation of the draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS)
and Notice of Availability later this fall,
there will be a formal notice and
comment period.
The submission of timely and specific
comments can affect a reviewer’s ability
to participate in subsequent
administrative or judicial review. At
this time, we anticipate using the 2000
planning rule pre-decisional objection
process (36 CFR 219.32) for
administrative review.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including the names
and addresses of those who comment
will be part of the public record.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered.
Applicable Planning Rule
Preparation of the revised plan was
underway when the 2008 National
Forest System land management
planning rule was enjoined on June 30,
2009, by the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
(Citizens for Better Forestry v. United
States Department of Agriculture, 632 F.
Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2009)).
On December 18, 2009, the Department
reinstated the previous planning rule,
commonly known as the 2000 planning
rule in the Federal Register (Federal
Register, Volume 74, No. 242, Friday,
December 18, 2009, pages 67059 thru
67075). The transition provisions of the
reinstated rule (36 CFR 219.35 and
appendices A and B) allow use of the
provisions of the National Forest System
land and resource management
planning rule in effect prior to the
effective date of the 2000 Rule
(November 9, 2000), commonly called
the 1982 planning rule, to amend or
revise plans. The Kaibab National Forest
has elected to use the provisions of the
1982 planning rule, including the
requirement to prepare an EIS, to
complete its plan revision.
The Kaibab National Forest Plan
revision was initiated with a Notice of
Initiation in the Federal Register on
April 20, 2009 (Vol. 74, No. 74, pages
17947–17948). Although the 2008
planning rule is no longer in effect,
information gathered prior to the court’s
injunction is useful for completing the
plan revision using the provisions of the
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
1982 planning rule. The Kaibab
National Forest has concluded that most
of the materials developed for the plan
revision process to date are appropriate
for continued use in the revision
process. The following foundation
documents are available at: https://
fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/plan_rev_docs.
• The Comprehensive Evaluation
Report (CER) that was signed April 14,
2010, after substantial public
collaboration forms the basis for need to
change the existing Forest Plan and the
proposed action for the plan revision.
• The CER supplementary document,
which supplemented the CER with
additional information to conform to the
Analysis of Management Situation
(AMS) need for change provisions of the
1982 planning rule, dated April 16,
2010.
• The Ecological Sustainability
Report (ESR), completed in December
2008, will continue to be used as a
reference in the planning process as
appropriate to those items in
conformance with the 2000 planning
rule transition language and 1982
planning rule provisions. It primarily
contains scientific information that is
not affected by the change of planning
rule. This information will be updated
with any new available information.
• The Social and Economic
Sustainability Report completed in
August 2008 is not affected by the
change in planning rule and will
continue to be used as a reference in the
planning process. This information will
be updated with new information as it
is available.
Additional background reports,
assessments, and information will be
used, some of which is available on the
Kaibab National Forest at: https://
fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/plan_revision.
As necessary or appropriate, the
material listed above will be further
adjusted as part of the planning process
using the provisions of the 1982
planning rule.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
[FR Doc. 2010–9425 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: The Fiscal Year 2010
appropriations legislation for the
Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board (CSB) provides
funding for a study by the National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) to examine
the use and storage of methyl
isocyanate, including the feasibility of
implementing alternative chemicals or
processes and an examination of the
cost of alternatives at the Bayer
CropScience facility in Institute, West
Virginia. With this notice, the CSB is
outlining the scope of the study to be
undertaken by the NAS and requesting
public comments regarding the study.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by the CSB on or before May
10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments, identified by docket number
CSB–10–01, by either of the following
methods:
• E-mail (preferred):
nascomments@csb.gov. Include CSB–
10–01 in the subject line of the message.
• Mail: Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board, Office of
Congressional, Public, and Board
Affairs, Attn: D. Horowitz, 2175 K
Street, NW., Suite 650, Washington, DC
20037.
Instructions: All comment
submissions must include the agency
name and docket number. All comments
received, including any personal
information provided, will be made
available to the public without
modifications or deletions. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
electronically, including acceptable file
formats, see the ‘‘Electronic Submission
of Comments’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. Comments received by
the CSB will be posted online in the
Open Government section of the CSB
Web site, https://www.csb.gov/
open.aspx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Daniel Horowitz, Director of
Congressional, Public, and Board
Affairs, at (202) 261–7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Background
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1600–1614; 36 CFR
219.35 (74 FR 67073–67074).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: April 16, 2010.
Michael R. Williams,
Forest Supervisor.
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD
INVESTIGATION BOARD
[Docket No. CSB–10–01]
National Academy of Sciences Study
AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Bayer CropScience Incident
On August 28, 2008, a fatal explosion
and fire occurred at the Bayer
CropScience (BCS) plant located in
Institute, West Virginia. The explosion
occurred during the restarting of the
plant’s methomyl production unit,
when highly toxic and reactive
methomyl waste was overloaded into a
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21223
residue treater vessel. A violent
runaway reaction ruptured the 5,000pound vessel and sent it through the
production unit, breaking pipes and
equipment. The explosion and resulting
chemical release and fire fatally injured
two employees. Six volunteer
firefighters and two others showed
likely symptoms of chemical exposure.
The blast wave damaged businesses
thousands of feet away.
Congressional Testimony
On April 21, 2009, John S. Bresland,
Chairman of the CSB, testified before
the House Energy and Commerce
Committee regarding the CSB’s ongoing
investigation at the BCS site. Chairman
Bresland testified that the CSB
investigation had revealed significant
lapses in process safety management.
Plant operators had received inadequate
training on a new computer control
system, which was being used for the
first time. Written operating procedures
were outdated and could not be
followed during startups, due to
longstanding equipment problems. The
heater for the residue treater was known
to be undersized. This regularly forced
operators to defeat critical safety
interlocks during startups—increasing
the chance of dangerously overloading
the treater with methomyl.
Chairman Bresland also stated that
the blast could have propelled the
residue treater in any direction. About
80 feet from the original location of the
treater, there was a 37,000-pound
capacity tank of methyl isocyanate
(MIC), which held 13,800 pounds of the
highly toxic and volatile liquid on the
night of the accident. Chairman
Bresland announced that the CSB was
further investigating whether this tank
was located in a safe position and
whether alternative arrangements to
using or storing MIC had been
considered at Bayer, or should be
considered in the future.
Interim Public Meeting
On April 23, 2009, the CSB
investigation team presented its initial
findings to the Board at a public
meeting in Institute, West Virginia. In
its presentation the CSB team stated that
it planned to conduct further studies on
how MIC was used and stored at the
facility, in light of the preliminary
findings.
Bayer Announcement
In August 2009, Bayer officials
announced a plan which they said
would reduce both the maximum and
the average inventory of MIC at the
Institute site by approximately 80%.
This would be accomplished in part by
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21221-21223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9425]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Plan Revision for Kaibab National Forest; Coconino, Yavapai, and
Mojave Counties; AZ
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to revise the forest plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As directed by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), the
USDA Forest Service is revising the Kaibab National Forest Land
Management Plan (forest plan) and will also prepare an environmental
impact statement (EIS) for the revised forest plan. This notice briefly
describes the nature of the decision to be made, the proposed action
and need for change, and information concerning public participation.
It also provides estimated dates for filing the EIS and the names and
addresses of the responsible agency official and the individuals who
can provide additional information. Finally, this notice briefly
describes the applicable planning rule and how work done on the plan
revision under the 2008 planning rule will be used or modified for
completing this plan revision.
The revised Kaibab National Forest Land Management Plan will
supersede the forest plan approved by the Regional Forester on April
15, 1988, amended eight times from 1988 to 2009. Two of the eight
amendments were site specific, involving the reclassification of
suitable timberlands to non-forest lands. The other six amendments were
programmatic; two clarified procedures, one incorporated direction for
the Regional amendment of Forest plans (goshawk, spotted owl, and old
growth), one incorporated direction for wildfire use, one adopted the
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum and Scenery Management System for the
Tusayan and Williams Ranger Districts, and one incorporated direction
for the treatment of noxious and invasive weeds. This amended forest
plan will remain in effect until the revised forest plan takes effect.
DATES: Comments concerning the need for change provided in this notice
will be most useful in the development of the draft revised plan and
draft environmental impact statement if received by June 1, 2010. The
agency expects to release a draft revised plan and draft environmental
impact statement for formal comment by fall 2010 and a final revised
plan and final environmental impact statement by summer 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Kaibab National Forest, Attention:
Forest Plan Revision Team, 800 S. 6th St., Williams, Arizona 86046.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to southwestern-kaibab@fs.fed.us
or via facsimile to (928) 635-8208, with ``Forest Plan Revision'' in
the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Leonard, Forest Planner, Kaibab
National Forest at (928) 635-8283 or e-mail: aleonard@fs.fed.us.
Information on this revision is also available at the Kaibab National
Forest revision Web site at https://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/plan_revision or by request. Individuals who use telecommunication devices
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Name and Address of the Responsible Official
The responsible official is Corbin Newman, Regional Forester,
Southwestern Region, 333 Broadway SE., Albuquerque, NM 87102.
Nature of the Decision To Be Made
The EIS process is meant to inform the Regional Forester so that he
can decide which forest plan alternative best meets the need to achieve
quality land management under the sustainable multiple-use management
concept, meet the diverse needs of people, and conserve the National
Forest's resources, as required by the NFMA and the Multiple Use
Sustained Yield Act (MUSYA). The new forest plan will describe the
strategic intent of managing the Kaibab National Forest into the next
10 to 15 years and will address the need for change described below.
The new forest plan will provide management direction in the form of
goals (desired conditions), objectives, suitability determinations,
standards, guidelines, and a monitoring plan, including the
identification of management indicator species (MIS). It may also make
new special area recommendations for wilderness, or other special
areas.
As important as the decisions to be made is the identification of
the types of decisions that will not be made within the revised forest
plan. The authorization of project-level activities on the forests is
not a decision made in the forest plan but occurs through subsequent
project specific decision-making. The designation of routes, trails,
and areas for motorized vehicle travel are not considered during plan
revision, but are being addressed in concurrent, but separate,
environmental assessments for motorized travel management planning on
the Williams, Tusayan, and North Kaibab Ranger Districts. Some issues
(e.g., hard rock mining on public domain lands), although important,
are beyond the authority or control of the Kaibab National Forest and
will not be considered. In addition, some issues, such as restoring
cottonwood willow riparian forests, may not be undertaken at this time,
but addressed later as future forest plan amendments.
Need for Change and Proposed Action
Since the forest plan was approved in 1988, there has been a shift
in management emphasis from outputs to outcomes, new scientific
information and understanding, and changes in economic, social, and
ecological conditions. The Analysis of the Management Situation (AMS)
and subsequent management reviews identified four priority needs that
will serve to focus the scope of this plan revision. These topics
reflect the priority needs for change and potential changes in program
direction that will be emphasized in the development of the revised
forest plan:
1. Modify stand structure and density of forested ecosystems
towards reference conditions and restore historic fire regimes. The
multiple ecological, social, and economic benefits of reducing the risk
of uncharacteristic fires made this a primary area of focus. The
revised Forest Plan will define desired characteristics including:
Species composition; structural characteristics such as spacing tree
groups and tree density; and disturbance patterns such as frequency,
severity, intensity, and size and fire. It will also describe the
strategies in the form of objectives, guidelines that will define the
``when'', ``where'', and ``how'' to achieve the desired conditions.
Objectives will focus on restoration activities such as thinning and
burning in high priority areas. Guidelines and standards will serve to
provide direction to focus and
[[Page 21222]]
constrain vegetation management activities.
2. Protect and regenerate aspen. The protection and regeneration of
aspen is a priority because of the important role aspen plays in
providing local habitat diversity and scenery. Aspen stands are
currently in decline throughout most of the southwest. On the Williams
Ranger District, most aspen stands are generally unhealthy because they
are being overtopped by conifers and there has been little to no
recruitment of young trees due to heavy browsing by Rocky Mountain elk.
The revised Forest Plan will define desired characteristics for aspen
including regeneration, recruitment, structural composition, understory
plants, and disturbance processes. Strategies for achieving desired
conditions will focus on thinning encroaching conifers, protection from
browse, and the reintroduction of fire.
3. Protect natural waters. The Kaibab National Forest is one of the
driest Forests in the Nation. With the exception of one perennial
stream that is less than 2 miles in length, most of the natural waters
are small springs and ephemeral wetlands. The current forest plan
offers little guidance for managing these rare and ecologically
important resources. Natural waters are centers of high biological
diversity, have traditional cultural significance, and are popular
recreation destinations. The revised forest plan will provide desired
conditions and include strategies to restore and protect natural
waters. This work is relatively inexpensive and would provide important
ecological and social benefits.
4. Restore grasslands by reducing tree encroachment in grasslands
and meadows. Tree encroachment into grasslands has reduced the amount
of grasslands significantly over the past 100 years. This reduction has
reduced the amount and quality of available habitat for grassland-
associated species. The montane/subalpine grasslands on the North
Kaibab Ranger District are at a higher risk of loss because they are
linear and encroachment occurs more quickly. Desired conditions for
grasslands will include desired natural patterns of abundance,
composition, and distribution. Strategies will focus on reducing tree
density, restoring fire to the ecosystem, and modifying fences that
would improve habitat connectivity for pronghorn antelope.
In addition to the priority needs for change topics above, this
forest plan revision process will develop consistent, efficient, and
scientifically-based plan components to provide direction for: (1) A
balanced range of recreation opportunities within the limits of the
administrative and resource capacity; (2) management response in the
years immediately following large disturbance events; (3) energy
corridors and renewable energy development requests; (4) mining
exploration and development; (5) special-use management; and (6)
special forest products collection. Additionally, the Forest will
review the results of the Wilderness Needs Assessment and the
eligibility of Kanab Creek Wild and Scenic River. Other needs for
change have been and will continue to be identified. These may be
addressed in the proposed forest plan, or incorporated in the future as
amendments.
Public Involvement
Extensive public involvement and collaboration has already taken
place. The Kaibab National Forest has hosted multiple general public
meetings in Williams, Tusayan, Flagstaff, Phoenix, Fredonia (all in
Arizona) and in Kanab, Utah, as well as focused meetings on ecological
sustainability and special areas. There was also a series of
facilitated collaborative stakeholder meetings, supported by spatial
modeling and analysis that were designed to identify high-priority
treatment areas and provide guidance for restoring fire adapted
ecosystems. The Kaibab National Forest also hosted five topic-based
``collaborwriting'' sessions and an on-line discussion forum that
focused on drafting desired conditions and guidance for grasslands,
springs/wetlands, aspen, mixed conifer forests, and recreation.
Consultation and collaboration with American Indian Tribes has been
ongoing, with multiple government to government meetings with the Hopi,
Navajo, Hualapai, Havasupai, Zuni, and Kaibab-Paiute Tribes. The Kaibab
forest plan revision was also a topic at several multitribe and Navajo
Chapters meetings.
Based on the collaborative process and other input received to
date, a working draft of the Kaibab National Forest Land Management
Plan has been prepared and is available at https://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/draft_plan for review and comment. The working draft is meant
to provide a foundation for continued collaborative discussion and
feedback before the proposed action/preferred alternative has been
finalized. The information received in response to this notice of
intent will be used to make additions and modifications needed to
finalize the proposed forest plan, identify issues and potential
alternatives, and guide the analysis of environmental effects.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of
the revised forest plan and EIS. Therefore, comments on the proposed
action and need for change will be most valuable if received by June 1,
2010, and should clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns.
Following the preparation of the draft environmental impact
statement (DEIS) and Notice of Availability later this fall, there will
be a formal notice and comment period.
The submission of timely and specific comments can affect a
reviewer's ability to participate in subsequent administrative or
judicial review. At this time, we anticipate using the 2000 planning
rule pre-decisional objection process (36 CFR 219.32) for
administrative review.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including the
names and addresses of those who comment will be part of the public
record. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered.
Applicable Planning Rule
Preparation of the revised plan was underway when the 2008 National
Forest System land management planning rule was enjoined on June 30,
2009, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California (Citizens for Better Forestry v. United States Department of
Agriculture, 632 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2009)). On
December 18, 2009, the Department reinstated the previous planning
rule, commonly known as the 2000 planning rule in the Federal Register
(Federal Register, Volume 74, No. 242, Friday, December 18, 2009, pages
67059 thru 67075). The transition provisions of the reinstated rule (36
CFR 219.35 and appendices A and B) allow use of the provisions of the
National Forest System land and resource management planning rule in
effect prior to the effective date of the 2000 Rule (November 9, 2000),
commonly called the 1982 planning rule, to amend or revise plans. The
Kaibab National Forest has elected to use the provisions of the 1982
planning rule, including the requirement to prepare an EIS, to complete
its plan revision.
The Kaibab National Forest Plan revision was initiated with a
Notice of Initiation in the Federal Register on April 20, 2009 (Vol.
74, No. 74, pages 17947-17948). Although the 2008 planning rule is no
longer in effect, information gathered prior to the court's injunction
is useful for completing the plan revision using the provisions of the
[[Page 21223]]
1982 planning rule. The Kaibab National Forest has concluded that most
of the materials developed for the plan revision process to date are
appropriate for continued use in the revision process. The following
foundation documents are available at: https://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/plan_rev_docs.
The Comprehensive Evaluation Report (CER) that was signed
April 14, 2010, after substantial public collaboration forms the basis
for need to change the existing Forest Plan and the proposed action for
the plan revision.
The CER supplementary document, which supplemented the CER
with additional information to conform to the Analysis of Management
Situation (AMS) need for change provisions of the 1982 planning rule,
dated April 16, 2010.
The Ecological Sustainability Report (ESR), completed in
December 2008, will continue to be used as a reference in the planning
process as appropriate to those items in conformance with the 2000
planning rule transition language and 1982 planning rule provisions. It
primarily contains scientific information that is not affected by the
change of planning rule. This information will be updated with any new
available information.
The Social and Economic Sustainability Report completed in
August 2008 is not affected by the change in planning rule and will
continue to be used as a reference in the planning process. This
information will be updated with new information as it is available.
Additional background reports, assessments, and information will be
used, some of which is available on the Kaibab National Forest at:
https://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/plan_revision.
As necessary or appropriate, the material listed above will be
further adjusted as part of the planning process using the provisions
of the 1982 planning rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1600-1614; 36 CFR 219.35 (74 FR 67073-
67074).
Dated: April 16, 2010.
Michael R. Williams,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-9425 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P