Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Cultural Visitors Program, 21119-21126 [2010-9328]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
11. Cost-sharing: Proposals should
maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus two copies of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will will be transmitted to OMB,
and be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information.)
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data
Requirements
Award recipients will be required to
maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the agreement or who
benefit from the award funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Mary Lou
Johnson-Pizarro, in the Office of Global
Educational Programs, ECA/A/S/U, SA–
05, Floor 4, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0504, (202) 632–
9483 Johnson-PizarroML@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/S/U–
10–03.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21119
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9323 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6963]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Cultural Visitors Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/CU–10–54.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 20, 2010.
Executive Summary: The U.S.
Department of State’s Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
seeks an organization with a strong
Washington presence to assist the Office
of Citizen Exchanges, Cultural Programs
Division, in the implementation of
short-term, high-visibility cultural
exchanges taking place during calendar
years 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Approximately 60 visitors from
countries around the world will
participate in initiatives/projects in the
United States designed to promote
interaction between foreign participants
and their American peers. Cultural
Visitors will include artists and arts
professionals as well as youth with a
special interest in the arts.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21120
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
I. Funding Opportunity Description
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
The goal of the Cultural Visitors
Program is to provide foreign artists, arts
professionals and foreign youth (aged
15–18 at the time of the exchange) with
a special interest in the arts, an
opportunity to travel to the United
States to participate in intensive
thematic and professional exchanges
that will strengthen their career
potential and deepen their
understanding of U.S. society and
culture. Specifically, this program will
enable participants to:
• Strengthen professional potential
through training, workshops and
meetings that also provide new contacts
and build networks;
• Foster understanding and build
relationships with others from different
ethnic, religious, and national groups;
• Learn more about U.S. society and
culture, thereby countering negative
stereotypes;
• Present their own culture to
Americans;
• Become part of a network of leaders
who will share their knowledge and
skills with their peers and the broader
community.
The award recipient must provide
overall programmatic, logistical, and
administrative support for each of
approximately 60 foreign visitors for
U.S.-based exchanges of approximately
5–30 days. Participants will include
foreign educators, social influencers,
artists, arts managers, and foreign youth
with special interest in the arts.
The Cultural Visitors Program will
include participation in American
cultural and historic projects developed
in cooperation with the National
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Endowment for Humanities (NEH), as
well as individually-designed programs
focused on the visual arts, dance, music,
drama, film, literature, and other artistic
and humanistic genres.
The award recipient will work closely
with Cultural Programs Division staff,
who will guide them through
programmatic, procedural, and
budgetary issues for the full range of
Cultural Visitor programs. Most projects
will start and end in Washington, DC.
Other activities will take place at other
sites in the United States. The exchange
format will be intensive and interactive,
weaving together both formal and
informal sessions to achieve the stated
goals and objectives. Applicants must
present program plans that allow the
participants to thoroughly explore the
themes in a creative, memorable, and
practical way. Activities should be
designed to be replicable and provide
practical knowledge and skills that the
participants can apply back in their
home country. Staff from the selected
organizations will be expected to be
available and/or attend certain
components of the visitor programs,
when necessary and appropriate, and in
coordination with ECA.
Programs must contain substantive
educational sessions or meetings that
focus on program objectives presented
by experts. Orientation sessions,
meetings, site visits, and other program
activities should promote dialogue
between participants and their U.S.
professional counterparts. Some cultural
programs for adult participants may
include a home stay or community visit.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/
C/CU is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as
follows:
• Selection of participants, who can
be from any country and any region in
the world;
• Participation in the general design
and direction of program activities;
• Approval and input on program
timelines and agendas;
• Guidance in execution of all
program components;
• Review and approval of all program
publicity and recruitment materials;
• Approval of decisions related to
special circumstances or problems
throughout duration of program;
• Management of all SEVIS-related
issues, including issuance of DS–2019s
for travel to the U.S.;
• Assistance with participant
emergencies;
• Liaison with relevant U.S.
Embassies and country desk officers at
the State Department.
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In consultation with ECA, the
recipient will:
• Plan and coordinate all aspects of
the visits, including generating
suggestions for visitors based on their
specific area of expertise;
• Arrange and pay for all air travel
(domestic and international) and local
transportation;
• Enroll participants in USG
sponsored health care coverage (ASPE)
and issue insurance cards upon arrival;
• Oversee all logistical aspects for the
arrival of the visitors to the United
States, and their departure;
• Prepare briefing materials;
• Locate, reserve and pay for hotels
and/or home stays as applicable;
• Locate, reserve and pay for meeting
rooms and/or other facilities;
• Engage appropriate cultural figures
and arrange for meetings/events with
them;
• Design and plan substantive and
well-organized activities;
• Coordinate and pay for escorts and
interpreters;
• Provide adult supervision for youth
(aged 15–18 at the time of the
exchange), including for overnight stays.
Minors shall not stay with host families;
• Arrange for orientation and debriefing sessions.
For purposes of this proposal, please
use the following Cultural Visitor
program as a model: Two music
teachers from Jakarta, Indonesia,
working with at-risk youth, will
participate in a five-day orientation in
Washington, DC and a seven-day
individually-designed professional
study program in St. Louis, Missouri.
Upon the conclusion of their workshop
or study program, the two visitors will
travel from St. Louis, Missouri to
Atlanta, Georgia, where they will
experience a three-day home stay, prior
to returning to Indonesia. The total
length of this program will be 15 days.
Program theme is ‘using the arts as a
mechanism for dealing with at-riskyouth.’
Proposals must demonstrate how
these activities and/or objectives will be
met and provide detailed information
on major program activities as well as a
justification for programmatic choices.
Programs must comply with J–1 visa
regulations. Please refer to the complete
Solicitation Package—this RFGP, the
Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI), and the
Proposal Submission Instructions
(PSI)—for further information.
For projects involving participants
under the age of 18 specifically, please
note the following:
The grant recipient must have a clear
and careful recruitment, screening, and
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
selection process for chaperones, and
must also provide the chaperones with
an orientation prior to the arrival of
their exchange participants,
emphasizing the goals of the program.
The orientation will provide chaperones
with detailed information on the
exchange program, the parameters of
their participation, duties, and
obligations, and information on cultural
differences and practices. Chaperone
references should be checked.
Projects with minor participants will
involve additional requirements, which
will be determined and communicated
by the program office prior to each
individual project.
While exchange participants may
share a hotel room with someone of a
similar age and the same gender, each
must have his or her own bed.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards:
One.
Approximate Average Award:
$500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 25,
2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
June 30, 2012.
Additional Information
Pending successful implementation of
this program and the availability of
funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA’s intent to renew this grant or
cooperative agreement for two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making an award in an
amount of $500,000 to support program
and administrative costs required to
implement theses exchange programs.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
(b) Award recipients must have a
Washington, DC presence. Applicants
who do not currently have a
Washington, DC presence must include
a detailed plan in their proposal for
establishing such a presence by October
1, 2010. The costs related to establishing
such a presence must be borne by the
award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in
this proposal. The award recipient must
have e-mail capability, access to Internet
resources, and the ability to exchange
data electronically with all partners
involved in the Cultural Visitors
Program.
(c) Proposals must demonstrate that
an applicant has an established resource
base of programming contacts and the
ability to keep this resource base
continuously updated. This resource
base should include speakers, thematic
specialists, or practitioners in a wide
range of professional fields in both the
private and public sectors.
(d) Technical Eligibility: In addition to
the requirements outlined in the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
technical format and instructions
document, all proposals must comply
with the following or they will result in
your proposal being declared
technically ineligible and given no
further consideration in the review
process.
The Office does not support proposals
limited to conferences or seminars (i.e.,
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21121
one- to fourteen-day programs with
plenary sessions, main speakers, panels,
and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small
part of a larger project in duration that
is receiving Bureau funding from this
competition.
No funding is available exclusively to
send U.S. citizens to conferences or
conference-type seminars overseas; nor
is funding available for bringing foreign
nationals to conferences or to routine
professional association meetings in the
United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does
not support academic research or
faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/CU, SA–05,
Third Floor, U.S. Department of State,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522–0503, telephone number: 202–
632–6422, fax number: 202–632–9355 or
e-mail: ProctorLM@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/
C/CU–10–54 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation. It
also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify LaFaye Proctor and
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/CU–10–54 located at
the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21122
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA Federal
assistance awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
organizations receiving awards (either a
grant or cooperative agreement) under
this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR 62. Therefore,
the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62
et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If
your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
62 et. seq., including the oversight of
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD, SA–05,
Floor C2, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–0582,
Telephone: (202) 632–9298, FAX: (202)
632–2900.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘‘Support for Diversity’’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the recipient organization
will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable timeframe), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior,
demonstrating concrete actions to apply
knowledge in work or community;
greater participation and responsibility
in civic organizations; interpretation
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts
between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be
given to the appropriate timing of data
collection for each level of outcome. For
example, satisfaction is usually
captured as a short-term outcome,
whereas behavior and institutional
changes are normally considered longerterm outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3e. Please Take the Following
Information Into Consideration When
Preparing Your Budget
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The award request may not
exceed $500,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local,
and in some cases, international,
transportation);
3. Orientations and de-briefings;
4. Cultural and social activities;
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging;
7. Interpreters and translation, when
necessary;
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21123
8. Follow-on activities;
9. Evaluation;
10. Stipends or allowances;
11. Other justifiable expenses directly
related to supporting program
activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: May 20,
2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU–
10–54.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the
SF–424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include
one extra copy of the completed SF–424
form and place it in an envelope
addressed to ‘‘ECA/EX/PM’’.
The original and ten copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21124
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/A/S/U–10–01, SA–05, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20522–0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word/Excel
format on CD–ROM. As appropriate, the
Bureau will provide these files
electronically to Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its
(their) review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA bears no
responsibility for applicant timeliness of
submission or data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday,
7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight
(12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site
for definitions of various ‘‘application
statuses’’ and the difference between a
submission receipt and a submission
validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an
electronic submission via Grants.gov
can take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov. ECA will
not notify you upon receipt of electronic
applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Executive Order 12372 does not apply
to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
awards cooperative agreements resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning: Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan
should adhere to the program overview
and guidelines described above.
Program schedules should reflect
innovative and relevant itineraries, and
creative and dynamic meetings and site
visits.
2. Ability To Achieve Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Your
proposal should clearly demonstrate
how your organization will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: The
proposed program should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding,
including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of longterm institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Your proposal
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
5. Project Evaluation: Your proposal
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that the
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique, plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives.
6. Institution’s Record/Ability/
Institutional Capacity: Your proposal
should demonstrate an institutional
record of successful international
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by the Bureau’s Grants
Office. The Bureau will consider the
past performance of prior recipients and
the demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project goals.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
7. Cost-effectiveness: The applicant
should demonstrate efficient use of
Bureau funds. The overhead and
administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate.
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
VI. Award Administration Information
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
LaFaye Proctor, telephone number 202–632–
6422, e-mail ProctorLM@state.gov.
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
VI.1b The Following Additional
Requirements Apply to This Project
A critical component of current U.S.
Government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact LaFaye Proctor,
telephone number 202–632–6422, e-mail
ProctorLM@state.gov for additional
information.
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus two copies of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements. A SF–
PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress Report’’
Cover.
(3) Quarterly program and financial
reports are required that provide concise
information on all programs completed
that quarter as well as a description of
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21125
planning undertaken for programs
taking place in the following quarter.
Financial reports should describe
funding allocated to each program
completed as well as an estimated
budget for programs to be undertaken in
the next quarter.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: LaFaye Proctor,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/
CU, 3–D11, ECA/PE/C/CU–10–54, U.S.
Department of State, SA–5, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522–
0503, telephone number: 202–632–6422,
fax number: 202–632–9355, e-mail
ProctorLM@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number: ECA/PE/C/
CU–10–54.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21126
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9328 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6965]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Study of the U.S. Institute
for Pakistani Student Leaders on
Comparative Public Policy
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/USS–10–28.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.009.
Key Dates: July–August, 2011.
Application Deadline: Friday, May 21,
2010.
Executive Summary: The Branch for
the Study of the United States, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
invites proposal submissions for the
design and implementation of a sixweek academic institute for up to 25
Pakistani student leaders focused on
comparative public policy.
The Study of the U.S. Institute for
Pakistani Student Leaders should
include: A summer academic course at
a U.S. university or college campus that
includes up to 20 American
undergraduate students at no cost to
ECA; volunteer community service
activities with peer mentors or other
Americans; leadership development;
and a one to two-week educational
study tour to another part of the United
States. In addition, Pakistani
participants should have opportunities
to make presentations about their
country or university studies on campus
or locally.
Pending availability of funds, support
for this program is being provided from
special FY–2009/FY–2010 supplemental
funds that have been appropriated to the
Department.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
The Study of the U.S. Institute for
Pakistani Student Leaders on
Comparative Public Policy is a new
program, created in response to the
interest of the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan
to provide opportunities for Pakistani
undergraduates to study at a U.S.
campus and to exchange ideas with
their American peers. The Study of the
U.S. Institutes for Student Leaders are
intensive academic programs whose
purpose is to provide groups of foreign
undergraduate students with an
introduction to a specific field of study,
while also heightening the participants’
general knowledge of U.S. society,
culture, and values.
In addition to promoting a better
understanding of the United States, an
important objective of the Student
Leader Institutes is to develop the
participants’ leadership skills. In this
context, the leadership component
should be experiential in nature and
include group discussions, training, and
exercises that focus on leadership
theories, teambuilding, collective
problem-solving skills, effective
communication, and management skills
for diverse organizational settings.
Additionally, community service
activities should allow participants to
experience firsthand how not-for-profit
organizations and volunteerism play a
role in U.S. civil society.
The program should also include
cultural activities, local site visits, and
an educational travel component within
the United States to illustrate the
various topics explored in class and to
gain an understanding of the regional
differences within the country. Finally,
the program should include
opportunities for participants to meet
U.S. citizens from a variety of
backgrounds and to speak to appropriate
student and civic groups about life in
their home countries.
Solicitations should allow for predeparture briefing and post-program
debriefing sessions at the U.S. Embassy
in Islamabad.
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Overview
The Study of the U.S. Institute for
Pakistani Student Leaders on
Comparative Public Policy should
provide Pakistani participants with an
overview of U.S. history and
government; the core of the course
should engage American and Pakistani
students in a comparative analysis of
governments and policies in the two
countries. Public policy discussions
could include topics such as foreign
policy, healthcare, agriculture, or
education and how these policies are
formulated and implemented,
examining the role of citizens, media,
lobbying groups, think-tanks, local,
state, and federal governments. In
addition, the institute should allow
participants to gain practical skills used
in the analysis of public policy. The
class should be crafted to maximize
interaction and cross-cultural study
between Pakistani and American
students in order to allow them to share
experiences and viewpoints.
Recipient
ECA is seeking detailed proposals
from U.S. colleges, universities, and
other not-for-profit organizations that
have an established reputation in one or
more of the following fields: Political
science, international relations, law,
history, sociology, American studies,
and/or other disciplines or subdisciplines related to the study of the
United States.
Program Design
The Study of the U.S. Institute for
Pakistani Student Leaders on
Comparative Public Policy should
provide a group of up to 25 Pakistani
students with a uniquely designed
program that provides a comparative
analysis of public policy. The academic
component of the institute should
include up to 20 U.S. students enrolled
in the class work. The institute must not
replicate existing or previous lectures,
workshops, or group activities designed
for American students but should be
tailored for the particular group of
students. The recipient should take into
account that the Pakistani participants
may have little or no prior knowledge of
the United States and varying degrees of
experience in expressing their opinions
in a classroom setting and should tailor
the curriculum and classroom activities
accordingly. Every effort should be
made to encourage active student
participation in all aspects of the
institute. The program should provide
ample time and opportunity for
discussion and interaction among
students, lecturers, and guest speakers.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 77 (Thursday, April 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21119-21126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6963]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Cultural Visitors Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 20, 2010.
Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) seeks an organization with a
strong Washington presence to assist the Office of Citizen Exchanges,
Cultural Programs Division, in the implementation of short-term, high-
visibility cultural exchanges taking place during calendar years 2010,
2011 and 2012. Approximately 60 visitors from countries around the
world will participate in initiatives/projects in the United States
designed to promote interaction between foreign participants and their
American peers. Cultural Visitors will include artists and arts
professionals as well as youth with a special interest in the arts.
[[Page 21120]]
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
The goal of the Cultural Visitors Program is to provide foreign
artists, arts professionals and foreign youth (aged 15-18 at the time
of the exchange) with a special interest in the arts, an opportunity to
travel to the United States to participate in intensive thematic and
professional exchanges that will strengthen their career potential and
deepen their understanding of U.S. society and culture. Specifically,
this program will enable participants to:
Strengthen professional potential through training,
workshops and meetings that also provide new contacts and build
networks;
Foster understanding and build relationships with others
from different ethnic, religious, and national groups;
Learn more about U.S. society and culture, thereby
countering negative stereotypes;
Present their own culture to Americans;
Become part of a network of leaders who will share their
knowledge and skills with their peers and the broader community.
The award recipient must provide overall programmatic, logistical,
and administrative support for each of approximately 60 foreign
visitors for U.S.-based exchanges of approximately 5-30 days.
Participants will include foreign educators, social influencers,
artists, arts managers, and foreign youth with special interest in the
arts.
The Cultural Visitors Program will include participation in
American cultural and historic projects developed in cooperation with
the National Endowment for Humanities (NEH), as well as individually-
designed programs focused on the visual arts, dance, music, drama,
film, literature, and other artistic and humanistic genres.
The award recipient will work closely with Cultural Programs
Division staff, who will guide them through programmatic, procedural,
and budgetary issues for the full range of Cultural Visitor programs.
Most projects will start and end in Washington, DC. Other activities
will take place at other sites in the United States. The exchange
format will be intensive and interactive, weaving together both formal
and informal sessions to achieve the stated goals and objectives.
Applicants must present program plans that allow the participants to
thoroughly explore the themes in a creative, memorable, and practical
way. Activities should be designed to be replicable and provide
practical knowledge and skills that the participants can apply back in
their home country. Staff from the selected organizations will be
expected to be available and/or attend certain components of the
visitor programs, when necessary and appropriate, and in coordination
with ECA.
Programs must contain substantive educational sessions or meetings
that focus on program objectives presented by experts. Orientation
sessions, meetings, site visits, and other program activities should
promote dialogue between participants and their U.S. professional
counterparts. Some cultural programs for adult participants may include
a home stay or community visit.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is substantially involved
in program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as follows:
Selection of participants, who can be from any country and
any region in the world;
Participation in the general design and direction of
program activities;
Approval and input on program timelines and agendas;
Guidance in execution of all program components;
Review and approval of all program publicity and
recruitment materials;
Approval of decisions related to special circumstances or
problems throughout duration of program;
Management of all SEVIS-related issues, including issuance
of DS-2019s for travel to the U.S.;
Assistance with participant emergencies;
Liaison with relevant U.S. Embassies and country desk
officers at the State Department.
In consultation with ECA, the recipient will:
Plan and coordinate all aspects of the visits, including
generating suggestions for visitors based on their specific area of
expertise;
Arrange and pay for all air travel (domestic and
international) and local transportation;
Enroll participants in USG sponsored health care coverage
(ASPE) and issue insurance cards upon arrival;
Oversee all logistical aspects for the arrival of the
visitors to the United States, and their departure;
Prepare briefing materials;
Locate, reserve and pay for hotels and/or home stays as
applicable;
Locate, reserve and pay for meeting rooms and/or other
facilities;
Engage appropriate cultural figures and arrange for
meetings/events with them;
Design and plan substantive and well-organized activities;
Coordinate and pay for escorts and interpreters;
Provide adult supervision for youth (aged 15-18 at the
time of the exchange), including for overnight stays. Minors shall not
stay with host families;
Arrange for orientation and de-briefing sessions.
For purposes of this proposal, please use the following Cultural
Visitor program as a model: Two music teachers from Jakarta, Indonesia,
working with at-risk youth, will participate in a five-day orientation
in Washington, DC and a seven-day individually-designed professional
study program in St. Louis, Missouri. Upon the conclusion of their
workshop or study program, the two visitors will travel from St. Louis,
Missouri to Atlanta, Georgia, where they will experience a three-day
home stay, prior to returning to Indonesia. The total length of this
program will be 15 days. Program theme is `using the arts as a
mechanism for dealing with at-risk-youth.'
Proposals must demonstrate how these activities and/or objectives
will be met and provide detailed information on major program
activities as well as a justification for programmatic choices.
Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations. Please refer to the
complete Solicitation Package--this RFGP, the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI), and the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI)--for further information.
For projects involving participants under the age of 18
specifically, please note the following:
The grant recipient must have a clear and careful recruitment,
screening, and
[[Page 21121]]
selection process for chaperones, and must also provide the chaperones
with an orientation prior to the arrival of their exchange
participants, emphasizing the goals of the program. The orientation
will provide chaperones with detailed information on the exchange
program, the parameters of their participation, duties, and
obligations, and information on cultural differences and practices.
Chaperone references should be checked.
Projects with minor participants will involve additional
requirements, which will be determined and communicated by the program
office prior to each individual project.
While exchange participants may share a hotel room with someone of
a similar age and the same gender, each must have his or her own bed.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: One.
Approximate Average Award: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 25, 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: June 30, 2012.
Additional Information
Pending successful implementation of this program and the
availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA's intent to
renew this grant or cooperative agreement for two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making an award
in an amount of $500,000 to support program and administrative costs
required to implement theses exchange programs. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b) Award recipients must have a Washington, DC presence.
Applicants who do not currently have a Washington, DC presence must
include a detailed plan in their proposal for establishing such a
presence by October 1, 2010. The costs related to establishing such a
presence must be borne by the award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in this proposal. The award recipient
must have e-mail capability, access to Internet resources, and the
ability to exchange data electronically with all partners involved in
the Cultural Visitors Program.
(c) Proposals must demonstrate that an applicant has an established
resource base of programming contacts and the ability to keep this
resource base continuously updated. This resource base should include
speakers, thematic specialists, or practitioners in a wide range of
professional fields in both the private and public sectors.
(d) Technical Eligibility: In addition to the requirements outlined
in the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) technical format and
instructions document, all proposals must comply with the following or
they will result in your proposal being declared technically ineligible
and given no further consideration in the review process.
The Office does not support proposals limited to conferences or
seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen-day programs with plenary sessions,
main speakers, panels, and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small part of a larger project in
duration that is receiving Bureau funding from this competition.
No funding is available exclusively to send U.S. citizens to
conferences or conference-type seminars overseas; nor is funding
available for bringing foreign nationals to conferences or to routine
professional association meetings in the United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does not support academic research
or faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/CU, SA-05,
Third Floor, U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20522-0503, telephone number: 202-632-6422, fax number: 202-632-9355
or e-mail: ProctorLM@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package.
Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54
located at the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also
contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific information, award criteria and
budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify LaFaye Proctor and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54 located at the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the
[[Page 21122]]
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA Federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will be third
parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of
the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient organizations shall
be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance
with'' 22 CFR 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization
receiving an award under this competition will render all assistance
necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et. seq., including
the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of
pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of
participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD, SA-05, Floor C2,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-0582, Telephone: (202) 632-
9298, FAX: (202) 632-2900.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
``Support for Diversity'' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal
[[Page 21123]]
include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient organization
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable timeframe), the easier it will be to conduct the
evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to
the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, demonstrating concrete actions to apply
knowledge in work or community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation
of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between
participants, community members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term
outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please Take the Following Information Into Consideration When
Preparing Your Budget
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The award request may not exceed $500,000. There must
be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local, and in some cases,
international, transportation);
3. Orientations and de-briefings;
4. Cultural and social activities;
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging;
7. Interpreters and translation, when necessary;
8. Follow-on activities;
9. Evaluation;
10. Stipends or allowances;
11. Other justifiable expenses directly related to supporting program
activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: May 20, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to
include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an
envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and ten copies of the application should be sent to:
Program
[[Page 21124]]
Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/A/S/U-10-01, SA-05, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word/Excel format on CD-ROM. As
appropriate, the Bureau will provide these files electronically to
Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its (their)
review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant timeliness
of submission or data errors resulting from transmission or conversion
processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the ``Get Started''
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described
above. Program schedules should reflect innovative and relevant
itineraries, and creative and dynamic meetings and site visits.
2. Ability To Achieve Program Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Your proposal should clearly
demonstrate how your organization will meet the program's objectives
and plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: The proposed program should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Your proposal should demonstrate
substantive support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and
relevant features should be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings,
resource materials and follow-up activities).
5. Project Evaluation: Your proposal should include a plan to
evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that the proposal include
a draft survey questionnaire or other technique, plus a description of
a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives.
6. Institution's Record/Ability/Institutional Capacity: Your
proposal should demonstrate an institutional record of successful
international exchange programs, including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants as determined by the Bureau's Grants Office. The Bureau
will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve
the program or project goals.
[[Page 21125]]
7. Cost-effectiveness: The applicant should demonstrate efficient
use of Bureau funds. The overhead and administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b The Following Additional Requirements Apply to This Project
A critical component of current U.S. Government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices. The State Department has made
the awarding of grants for this purpose a key component of its Iran
policy. As a condition of licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224; and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing conditions
mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct
this vetting the Department will collect information from grantees and
sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of their key
employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran complies
with requirements, please contact LaFaye Proctor, telephone number
202-632-6422, e-mail ProctorLM@state.gov for additional information.
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
LaFaye Proctor, telephone number 202-632-6422, e-mail
ProctorLM@state.gov.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of
the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements. A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover.
(3) Quarterly program and financial reports are required that
provide concise information on all programs completed that quarter as
well as a description of planning undertaken for programs taking place
in the following quarter. Financial reports should describe funding
allocated to each program completed as well as an estimated budget for
programs to be undertaken in the next quarter.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: LaFaye Proctor,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/CU, 3-D11, ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54,
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522-0503, telephone number: 202-632-6422, fax number: 202-632-9355,
e-mail ProctorLM@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-54.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
[[Page 21126]]
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-9328 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P