Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant Proposals: Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study Program (YES): “US YES Inbound Placement and YES Abroad Recruitment Components”, 21131-21138 [2010-9322]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information).
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Britta S.
Bjornlund, U.S. Department of State,
Study of the U.S. Branch, ECA/A/E/
USS, SA–5, 4th Floor, ECA/A/E/USS–
10–28, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20522–0504, Telephone: (202) 632–
3339, Fax: (202) 632–9411, E-mail:
BjornlundBS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
USS–10–28.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21131
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9326 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6967]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
Proposals: Kennedy-Lugar Youth
Exchange and Study Program (YES):
‘‘US YES Inbound Placement and YES
Abroad Recruitment Components’’
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–10–07.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates: September 1, 2010–
September 30, 2013.
Application Deadline: June 3, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
announces an open competition for
grants to support exchanges and
relationship building between high
school students from countries with
significant Muslim populations and the
people of the United States. Public and
private non-profit organizations meeting
the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) and public institutions may
submit a proposal for the YES Inbound
U.S. Placement and YES Abroad
Recruitment Components.
The Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange
and Study (YES) Program provides
scholarships for reciprocal high school
academic exchanges of approximately
1077 students from approximately 35
countries coming to the U.S. and
approximately 50 American students
traveling to approximately 10 of these
countries.
To implement the entirety of the YES
program, two Requests for Grant
Proposals are being announced: One
(this announcement) covers KennedyLugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES)
Program Inbound U.S. Placement and
YES Abroad Recruitment Components.
A second, separate announcement will
solicit proposals for the Kennedy-Lugar
Youth Exchange and Study Program
(YES) Overseas Recruitment and YES
Abroad Placement and Alumni
Components to: Develop marketing
materials and a handbook for U.S. and
non-U.S. students, host families and
host schools, recruit and select
approximately 1077 YES Inbound
participants, make a final selection of
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
21132
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
approximately 50 American Outbound
participants and place them in 10
eligible countries overseas, and organize
all alumni programs for YES Abroad
and YES Inbound participants.
This Inbound U.S. Placement and
YES Abroad Recruitment Components
announcement envisions 12 to 15
awards for the U.S. placement of 20–300
students each, and includes:
• U.S. host family and school
selection for YES Inbound participants.
• Host family and student U.S.-based
orientations.
• Student monitoring and support
and enhancement activities for YES
Inbound.
• American Student Recruitment and
nomination for the YES Abroad
Program.
• Where possible, engagement of YES
Abroad alumni.
The YES Inbound program provides
scholarships for high school students
(15–18.5 years) from countries with
significant Muslim populations to spend
up to one academic year in the U.S. The
program promotes mutual
understanding and respect. Students
live with host families, attend high
school, engage in activities to learn
about American society and values,
acquire leadership skills, and help
educate Americans about their countries
and cultures.
Organizations are invited to submit
proposals to recruit, screen and select
U.S. host families; identify accredited
U.S. high schools and secure school
placements; conduct local student and
host family orientations; provide
cultural and educational enrichment
activities; handle all counseling,
programmatic and on-program
participant monitoring issues; and
evaluate program implementation for a
portion of the students participating in
the YES program during the 2011–12
academic year. Each applicant must
propose to place a minimum of 20 YES
inbound students, up to a maximum of
300 students, as it is the expectation
that 12–15 awards will be made in order
to place and support the approximate
total of 1077 students.
In addition, organizations will recruit
and nominate students from these same
United States communities for the
Kennedy-Lugar YES Abroad Program.
This YES Abroad program will send
approximately 50 U.S. citizen students
from the United States to selected YES
countries for the 2011–12 academic
year. For YES Abroad, the eligible
hosting countries at the time of
publication of this RFGP are: Egypt,
Ghana, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali,
Morocco, Oman, Thailand, and Turkey.
However, the Bureau reserves the right
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
to amend these lists at any time as
conditions change. Under YES Inbound
US Placement and YES Abroad
Recruitment Components grants,
organizations will be asked to market
the YES Abroad program to U.S.
students, identify potential qualified
YES Abroad program participants, and
submit nominations of qualified
American students to the Overseas YES
Inbound Recruitment and YES Abroad
Placement and Alumni Components
grantee for final selection and overseas
placement.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Inbound Kennedy-Lugar
Youth Exchange and Study (YES)
Program is designed to foster a global
community of shared interests and
values developed through better mutual
understanding via first-hand
participation of high school students,
preferably aged 15–18.5, from countries
with significant Muslim populations in
academic year or semester exchanges to
the United States. Participants will
reside with American host families and
attend high school during the 2011–12
academic year. The YES Abroad
program is designed to provide the same
experience for high school students
from the United States in some of the
same YES countries. Both programs seek
to select students with leadership
potential, to develop their leadership
skills while in the U.S. or abroad, and
to support them in alumni activities
after they return home.
Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
proposals to recruit and select host
families and schools for high school
students between the ages of 15 and
18.5. This solicitation refers to YES
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
students from the following countries:
Afghanistan, Albania, Bahrain,
Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Cameroon, Egypt, Gaza, India,
Indonesia, Israel (Arab Communities),
Jordan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait,
Lebanon, Liberia, Macedonia, Malaysia,
Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria,
Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone,
South Africa, Suriname, Tanzania,
Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, West Bank,
and Yemen.
In addition to identifying schools and
screening host families in the United
States for inbound YES student
placements, grantee organizations will
be responsible for: (1) Orienting all
inbound students to local conditions,
resources and opportunities; (2)
providing support services for students;
(3) arranging enhancement activities
and skill-building opportunities; (4)
monitoring student health, safety and
welfare, host family and coordinator
performance and student academic
progress; (5) providing mid-year
programming and re-entry training; (6)
evaluating project success; (7) recruiting
YES Abroad applicants from American
high schools; (8) nominating candidates
for YES Abroad to the grantee
responsible for the ‘‘YES Overseas YES
Inbound Recruitment, YES Abroad
Placement, and Alumni Components’’
(selected under a separate competition)
to be considered for selection.
Preference will be given to those
organizations that offer participants
opportunities to develop leadership
skills and raise their awareness of
tolerance and civic responsibility
through community activities and
networks.
During the year, YES participants will
be engaged in a variety of activities,
such as community and school-based
programs, skill-building workshops, and
cultural events. Academic year 2011–
2012 will be the ninth year of the YES
program, with more than 4,000 students
having been awarded scholarships since
the program’s inception.
Goals: The overarching goals of the
YES program are to:
• Promote better understanding by
youth from selected countries about
host country society, people,
institutions, values and culture;
• Foster lasting personal ties;
• Engage the exchange participants in
activities that advance mutual
understanding, respect for diversity,
leadership skills, and understanding of
civil society during their exchange in
the U.S.;
• Enhance Americans’ understanding
of other countries and cultures;
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
Considering the specific focus of the
YES program, the following outcomes
will indicate a successful project:
1. Inbound participants will develop
an appreciation for American culture,
an understanding of the underlying
values and diversity of American
society, and increased tolerance and
respect for others with differing views
and beliefs.
2. Participants will teach their hosts
about the cultures of their home
countries.
3. Inbound participants will interact
with Americans and generate enduring
ties. YES Abroad participants will learn
about the cultures and underlying
values of the countries in which they
study, and help educate others about
American culture while learning about
their host country’s culture.
4. Inbound participants will acquire
an understanding of important elements
of a civil society. This includes concepts
such as volunteerism, the idea that
American citizens can and do act at the
grassroots level to deal with societal
problems, and an awareness of and
respect for the Rule of Law.
5. Participants will gain leadership
skills that will enable them, as YES
alumni, to initiate activities in their
home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Objectives: The objectives of the YES
program are:
• To place up to 1,077 pre-selected
inbound high school students from over
35 countries in safe, qualified, wellsuited host families; and recruit
approximately 50 American students
who will travel to approximately 10 of
these countries;
• To place students in accredited
schools and safe, supportive and
welcoming host family living
environments;
• To expose inbound program
participants to American culture and
enable them to obtain a broad view of
U.S. society and history;
• To provide appropriate venues for
program participants to share their
culture, lifestyles, and traditions with
host country citizens;
• To provide participants with
development opportunities that foster
skills they can take back with them and
use in their home countries; and
• To provide activities that will
increase and enhance students’
leadership capacity, enabling them—as
YES alumni—to initiate activities in
their home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Other Components: Under a separate
grant, one organization will administer
the ‘‘Overseas YES Inbound
Recruitment, YES Abroad Placement,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Alumni Components’’ of the YES
program, both Inbound and Abroad, and
perform the following functions:
recruitment and selection of the
international students; assistance in
documentation and preparation of DS–
2019 visa forms; preparation of crosscultural materials; pre-departure
orientation; international travel from
home to host community and return;
facilitation of ongoing communication
between the natural parents and the
placement organization, as needed;
maintenance of a student database and
provision of data to the U.S. Department
of State; placement of 50 American YES
Abroad students and ongoing follow-up
with alumni after their return to their
home countries.
Another organization will be
responsible for supporting students with
disabilities. This involves a post-arrival
orientation and a year-end reentry
training, as well as ongoing
supplemental support throughout the
year in order to help the students cope
with challenges specific to their
circumstances.
This same grantee organization will
assess students with disabilities at the
start of the academic year. Placement
organizations may find the students’
assessments useful in helping the
students adjust to their new
communities. Placement organizations
will be in direct communication with
both of these organizations.
Guidelines: Applicants are requested
to submit a narrative outlining a
comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of
the placement component of the YES
program to include the following
responsibilities:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection,
and YES-specific orientation of local
coordinators and host families;
(2) Enrollment in an accredited
school;
(3) Post-arrival orientation for
participants;
(4) Placement of a small number of
students with disabilities;
(5) In Spring 2011, on a date given by
the Organizational Component grantee,
prepare and convey to the organization
administering the Organizational
Components grant the materials
pertaining to each Inbound student’s
placement, including information on the
hosting community, host family
information, and school. These
materials will be distributed to the
students at the Pre-Departure
Orientation;
(6) Troubleshooting;
(7) Monitoring the health, safety and
welfare of students, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21133
performance of host families and local
coordinators;
(8) Quarterly evaluation of the
organization’s success in achieving
program goals;
(9) Mid-year orientations to assess
progress; and further explore cultural
observations;
(10) Re-entry training to assist
students with closure in the U.S. and
readjustment to their home
environments.
(11) Recruitment of prospective YES
Abroad students in American high
schools and other youth organizations.
(12) To follow a nomination strategy
developed by the grantee responsible for
the ‘‘Overseas YES Inbound
Recruitment, YES Abroad Placement,
and Alumni Components’’ to submit
names of potential YES Abroad
students.
Applicants must request a grant for
placement and monitoring of at least 20
and no more than 300 inbound students.
Placements may be in any region of the
United States. Strong preference will be
given to organizations that choose to
place participants in clusters of at least
three students (these students should be
from different countries) in a particular
Local Coordinator’s area of
responsibility. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for details on
essential program elements, permissible
costs, and criteria used to select and
place students. We anticipate grants
beginning no later than September 2010,
subject to the availability of funds.
Inbound participants begin to arrive
in their host communities in August
2011 and remain for 10 or 11 months
until their departure mid-May to early
July 2012.
Administration of the program must
be in compliance with reporting and
withholding regulations for federal,
state, and local taxes as applicable.
Recipient organizations should
demonstrate regulation adherence in the
proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health
and accident insurance plans they
intend to use for students on this
program. If use of a private plan is
proposed, the State Department will
compare that plan with the Bureau plan
and make a determination as to which
will be applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$9,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 12–
15 grants.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21134
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
Approximate Average Award:
Funding level is dependent on the
number of proposed students,
monitoring, the quality of support, and
volume of activities.
Anticipated Award Date: September
2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
August 2012.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program, awardees’ ability to comply
with Federal Regulations and ECA
guidelines, and the availability of funds
in subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant or cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with fewer than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. Since an award to
support program and administrative
costs required to implement this
exchange program for a minimum of 20
students will exceed $60,000,
organizations with less than four years
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
experience in conducting international
exchanges are ineligible to apply under
this competition. The Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact The Office of Youth
Programs, ECA/PE/C/PY, SA–5, Floor 3,
U.S. Department of State, 2200 C St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20522–0503,
telephone (202) 632–6065, and fax (202)
632–9355, e-mail Matt O’Rourke at
ORourkeMM@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C/PY–10–07 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see
section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation. It
also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify the Funding
Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY–
10–07) at the top of this announcement
on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via the Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI) for
additional formatting and technical
requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
organizations receiving awards (either a
grant or cooperative agreement) under
this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR 62. Therefore,
the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62
et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62.
If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, you should discuss your
record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et
seq., including the oversight of
Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
ECA will review the record of
compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq. of
applicant organizations designated as
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
ECA’s Office of Private Sector Exchange
as one factor in evaluating the record/
ability of organizations to carry out
successful exchange programs.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/
D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0582.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
Funds provided through this award
may not be used to promote
participation in, or to purchase
equipment or supplies intended for,
activities related to religious worship or
proselytization. Host families, school
officials, and grantee organizations shall
not require program participants to
attend religious services. However, as
part of their exchange experience,
participants may be offered the
opportunity to take part voluntarily in
this facet of their host culture, at their
own discretion. Volunteer host families
(who receive no financial benefit from
grant funds) are encouraged to enable
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21135
participants living with them to attend
services of the participant’s religion, if
the participant so desires and the
services are available within a
reasonable distance of the host family’s
residence.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the recipient organization
will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
21136
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be
given to the appropriate timing of data
collection for each level of outcome. For
example, satisfaction is usually
captured as a short-term outcome,
whereas behavior and institutional
changes are normally considered longerterm outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The budget must reflect costs
for a minimum of 20 and no more than
300 YES Inbound participants. Please
indicate clearly the number of students
funded. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Any/all sub-awards/
agreements including accompanying
budgets required to accomplish overall
program objectives described herein,
shall be submitted with the proposal
package and must be approved by the
Grants Officer, prior to commencement.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 3,
2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
10–07.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include
one extra copy of the completed SF–424
form and place it in an envelope
addressed to ‘‘ECA/EX/PM’’.
The original and ten (10) copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY–10–07, SA–5, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20522–0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
CD–ROM to the program officer at
BakerKM1@state.gov. As appropriate,
the Bureau will provide these files
electronically to Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their
review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
Please note: ECA bears no
responsibility for applicant timeliness of
submission or data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800 -518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. In
addition, ECA will review the record of
compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq. of
applicant organizations designated as
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors by
ECA’s Office of Private Sector Exchange.
If it is determined that an applicant
organization submitting a proposal has
a record of not being in compliance,
their proposal will be deemed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
technically ineligible and receive no
further consideration in the review
process. If in compliance, the applicant
organization’s record of compliance will
be used as one factor in evaluating the
record/ability of organizations to carry
out successful exchange programs.
All eligible proposals will be
reviewed by the program office, as well
as the Public Diplomacy section
overseas, where appropriate. Eligible
proposals will be subject to compliance
with Federal and Bureau regulations
and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other
Department elements. Final funding
decisions are at the discretion of the
Department of State’s Assistant
Secretary for Educational and Cultural
Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards grants resides with
the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning/Ability To
Achieve Program Objectives:
Your proposal narrative should
exhibit originality, substance, and
relevance to the Bureau’s mission.
Reviewers will assess the degree to
which proposals engage participants in
community activities that involve skills
development and leadership training. A
detailed agenda and work plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described in the solicitation
package. Reviewers will also assess the
degree to which the proposed outcomes
of the project are realistic and
measurable. Strategies should creatively
utilize resources at the local level to
ensure an efficient use of program
funds.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, host families,
schools, program venue, and program
evaluation) and program content
(orientations, program meetings,
resource materials and follow-up
activities).
3. Organization’s Record/Institutional
Capacity: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project’s goals. Reviewers
will assess the applicant and its partners
to determine if they offer adequate
resources, expertise, and experience to
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21137
fulfill program objectives. Partner
activities should be clearly defined.
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting and J–1
Visa requirements for past Bureau grants
as determined by Bureau Grant Staff. In
addition, organizations designated as
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors
must include a discussion of their
record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et
seq., including the oversight of their
Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
Proposals that fail to include the above
information in their narrative will be
deemed less or not competitive under
this review criterion. ECA will review
the record of compliance with 22 CFR
62 et seq. of organizations designated as
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors as
one factor in evaluating the record/
ability of organizations to carry out
successful exchange programs.
4. Multiplier Effect: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages. Reviewers will
assess ways in which proposals include
innovative ideas to expose U.S.
communities to YES-related goals and
activities that involve students, host
families and schools. This includes
media outreach, visits to local and
national government representatives,
Internet-based applications and other
interactions. Reviewers will also
evaluate substantive plans to prepare
YES students for their role as active,
effective YES alumni.
5. Participant Monitoring: Proposals
must include a detailed monitoring
plan, which addresses Student, Local
Coordinator (LC) and Host Family (HF)
monitoring. Given the importance the
Department places on this criterion, you
should dedicate a significant percentage
of the narrative to explaining how you
will achieve the Department’s goals in
regard to monitoring the health, safety
and welfare of program participants.
You may use the appendices to house
additional details and supporting
documentation. Please see the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) for additional details regarding
this review criterion.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to monitor and
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21138
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices
evaluate the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. Reviewers will assess your
plans to monitor student progress and
program activities, particularly in regard
to intended outcomes indicated in your
proposal. Grantees will be expected to
submit quarterly reports, which should
be included as an inherent component
of the work plan.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost sharing:
Reviewers will analyze the budget for
clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will
also assess the rationale of the proposed
budget and whether the allocation of
funds is appropriate to complete tasks
outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions. Preference will be given
to organizations whose proposals
demonstrate a quality, cost-effective
program.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments.’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Apr 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements With Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
Other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will will be transmitted to OMB,
and be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial
reports which should include both
quantitative and qualitative data you
have available.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information.)
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Kevin Baker,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/
PY, SA–5, Floor 3, Department of State,
2200 C St., NW., Washington, DC
20522–0503. Telephone: (202) 632–
6073;E-mail: BakerKM1@state.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above contact and ECA/PE/C/PY–
10–07.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9322 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6966]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
Proposals: DanceMotion USA
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/CU–10–24.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 27, 2010.
Executive Summary
The Cultural Programs Division,
within the Office of Citizen Exchanges
of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, announces an open
competition for a cooperative agreement
to administer the 2010–2012 cycle of the
DanceMotion USA Program. The
program’s goal is to showcase the best
of American dance and provide an
opportunity to directly engage priority
audiences in foreign countries. The
program will consist of approximately
four to six tours by approximately the
same number of U.S. dance companies,
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 77 (Thursday, April 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21131-21138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9322]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6967]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for
Grant Proposals: Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study Program (YES):
``US YES Inbound Placement and YES Abroad Recruitment Components''
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-07.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates: September 1, 2010-September 30, 2013.
Application Deadline: June 3, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces an open competition
for grants to support exchanges and relationship building between high
school students from countries with significant Muslim populations and
the people of the United States. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) and public institutions may submit a
proposal for the YES Inbound U.S. Placement and YES Abroad Recruitment
Components.
The Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES) Program provides
scholarships for reciprocal high school academic exchanges of
approximately 1077 students from approximately 35 countries coming to
the U.S. and approximately 50 American students traveling to
approximately 10 of these countries.
To implement the entirety of the YES program, two Requests for
Grant Proposals are being announced: One (this announcement) covers
Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES) Program Inbound U.S.
Placement and YES Abroad Recruitment Components. A second, separate
announcement will solicit proposals for the Kennedy-Lugar Youth
Exchange and Study Program (YES) Overseas Recruitment and YES Abroad
Placement and Alumni Components to: Develop marketing materials and a
handbook for U.S. and non-U.S. students, host families and host
schools, recruit and select approximately 1077 YES Inbound
participants, make a final selection of
[[Page 21132]]
approximately 50 American Outbound participants and place them in 10
eligible countries overseas, and organize all alumni programs for YES
Abroad and YES Inbound participants.
This Inbound U.S. Placement and YES Abroad Recruitment Components
announcement envisions 12 to 15 awards for the U.S. placement of 20-300
students each, and includes:
U.S. host family and school selection for YES Inbound
participants.
Host family and student U.S.-based orientations.
Student monitoring and support and enhancement activities
for YES Inbound.
American Student Recruitment and nomination for the YES
Abroad Program.
Where possible, engagement of YES Abroad alumni.
The YES Inbound program provides scholarships for high school
students (15-18.5 years) from countries with significant Muslim
populations to spend up to one academic year in the U.S. The program
promotes mutual understanding and respect. Students live with host
families, attend high school, engage in activities to learn about
American society and values, acquire leadership skills, and help
educate Americans about their countries and cultures.
Organizations are invited to submit proposals to recruit, screen
and select U.S. host families; identify accredited U.S. high schools
and secure school placements; conduct local student and host family
orientations; provide cultural and educational enrichment activities;
handle all counseling, programmatic and on-program participant
monitoring issues; and evaluate program implementation for a portion of
the students participating in the YES program during the 2011-12
academic year. Each applicant must propose to place a minimum of 20 YES
inbound students, up to a maximum of 300 students, as it is the
expectation that 12-15 awards will be made in order to place and
support the approximate total of 1077 students.
In addition, organizations will recruit and nominate students from
these same United States communities for the Kennedy-Lugar YES Abroad
Program. This YES Abroad program will send approximately 50 U.S.
citizen students from the United States to selected YES countries for
the 2011-12 academic year. For YES Abroad, the eligible hosting
countries at the time of publication of this RFGP are: Egypt, Ghana,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali, Morocco, Oman, Thailand, and Turkey.
However, the Bureau reserves the right to amend these lists at any time
as conditions change. Under YES Inbound US Placement and YES Abroad
Recruitment Components grants, organizations will be asked to market
the YES Abroad program to U.S. students, identify potential qualified
YES Abroad program participants, and submit nominations of qualified
American students to the Overseas YES Inbound Recruitment and YES
Abroad Placement and Alumni Components grantee for final selection and
overseas placement.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The Inbound Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES)
Program is designed to foster a global community of shared interests
and values developed through better mutual understanding via first-hand
participation of high school students, preferably aged 15-18.5, from
countries with significant Muslim populations in academic year or
semester exchanges to the United States. Participants will reside with
American host families and attend high school during the 2011-12
academic year. The YES Abroad program is designed to provide the same
experience for high school students from the United States in some of
the same YES countries. Both programs seek to select students with
leadership potential, to develop their leadership skills while in the
U.S. or abroad, and to support them in alumni activities after they
return home.
Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may
submit proposals to recruit and select host families and schools for
high school students between the ages of 15 and 18.5. This solicitation
refers to YES students from the following countries: Afghanistan,
Albania, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria,
Cameroon, Egypt, Gaza, India, Indonesia, Israel (Arab Communities),
Jordan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lebanon, Liberia, Macedonia, Malaysia,
Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Suriname, Tanzania,
Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, West Bank, and Yemen.
In addition to identifying schools and screening host families in
the United States for inbound YES student placements, grantee
organizations will be responsible for: (1) Orienting all inbound
students to local conditions, resources and opportunities; (2)
providing support services for students; (3) arranging enhancement
activities and skill-building opportunities; (4) monitoring student
health, safety and welfare, host family and coordinator performance and
student academic progress; (5) providing mid-year programming and re-
entry training; (6) evaluating project success; (7) recruiting YES
Abroad applicants from American high schools; (8) nominating candidates
for YES Abroad to the grantee responsible for the ``YES Overseas YES
Inbound Recruitment, YES Abroad Placement, and Alumni Components''
(selected under a separate competition) to be considered for selection.
Preference will be given to those organizations that offer
participants opportunities to develop leadership skills and raise their
awareness of tolerance and civic responsibility through community
activities and networks.
During the year, YES participants will be engaged in a variety of
activities, such as community and school-based programs, skill-building
workshops, and cultural events. Academic year 2011-2012 will be the
ninth year of the YES program, with more than 4,000 students having
been awarded scholarships since the program's inception.
Goals: The overarching goals of the YES program are to:
Promote better understanding by youth from selected
countries about host country society, people, institutions, values and
culture;
Foster lasting personal ties;
Engage the exchange participants in activities that
advance mutual understanding, respect for diversity, leadership skills,
and understanding of civil society during their exchange in the U.S.;
Enhance Americans' understanding of other countries and
cultures;
[[Page 21133]]
Considering the specific focus of the YES program, the following
outcomes will indicate a successful project:
1. Inbound participants will develop an appreciation for American
culture, an understanding of the underlying values and diversity of
American society, and increased tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs.
2. Participants will teach their hosts about the cultures of their
home countries.
3. Inbound participants will interact with Americans and generate
enduring ties. YES Abroad participants will learn about the cultures
and underlying values of the countries in which they study, and help
educate others about American culture while learning about their host
country's culture.
4. Inbound participants will acquire an understanding of important
elements of a civil society. This includes concepts such as
volunteerism, the idea that American citizens can and do act at the
grassroots level to deal with societal problems, and an awareness of
and respect for the Rule of Law.
5. Participants will gain leadership skills that will enable them,
as YES alumni, to initiate activities in their home countries that
focus on development and community service.
Objectives: The objectives of the YES program are:
To place up to 1,077 pre-selected inbound high school
students from over 35 countries in safe, qualified, well-suited host
families; and recruit approximately 50 American students who will
travel to approximately 10 of these countries;
To place students in accredited schools and safe,
supportive and welcoming host family living environments;
To expose inbound program participants to American culture
and enable them to obtain a broad view of U.S. society and history;
To provide appropriate venues for program participants to
share their culture, lifestyles, and traditions with host country
citizens;
To provide participants with development opportunities
that foster skills they can take back with them and use in their home
countries; and
To provide activities that will increase and enhance
students' leadership capacity, enabling them--as YES alumni--to
initiate activities in their home countries that focus on development
and community service.
Other Components: Under a separate grant, one organization will
administer the ``Overseas YES Inbound Recruitment, YES Abroad
Placement, and Alumni Components'' of the YES program, both Inbound and
Abroad, and perform the following functions: recruitment and selection
of the international students; assistance in documentation and
preparation of DS-2019 visa forms; preparation of cross-cultural
materials; pre-departure orientation; international travel from home to
host community and return; facilitation of ongoing communication
between the natural parents and the placement organization, as needed;
maintenance of a student database and provision of data to the U.S.
Department of State; placement of 50 American YES Abroad students and
ongoing follow-up with alumni after their return to their home
countries.
Another organization will be responsible for supporting students
with disabilities. This involves a post-arrival orientation and a year-
end reentry training, as well as ongoing supplemental support
throughout the year in order to help the students cope with challenges
specific to their circumstances.
This same grantee organization will assess students with
disabilities at the start of the academic year. Placement organizations
may find the students' assessments useful in helping the students
adjust to their new communities. Placement organizations will be in
direct communication with both of these organizations.
Guidelines: Applicants are requested to submit a narrative
outlining a comprehensive strategy for the administration and
implementation of the placement component of the YES program to include
the following responsibilities:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection, and YES-specific orientation
of local coordinators and host families;
(2) Enrollment in an accredited school;
(3) Post-arrival orientation for participants;
(4) Placement of a small number of students with disabilities;
(5) In Spring 2011, on a date given by the Organizational Component
grantee, prepare and convey to the organization administering the
Organizational Components grant the materials pertaining to each
Inbound student's placement, including information on the hosting
community, host family information, and school. These materials will be
distributed to the students at the Pre-Departure Orientation;
(6) Troubleshooting;
(7) Monitoring the health, safety and welfare of students, and the
performance of host families and local coordinators;
(8) Quarterly evaluation of the organization's success in achieving
program goals;
(9) Mid-year orientations to assess progress; and further explore
cultural observations;
(10) Re-entry training to assist students with closure in the U.S.
and readjustment to their home environments.
(11) Recruitment of prospective YES Abroad students in American
high schools and other youth organizations.
(12) To follow a nomination strategy developed by the grantee
responsible for the ``Overseas YES Inbound Recruitment, YES Abroad
Placement, and Alumni Components'' to submit names of potential YES
Abroad students.
Applicants must request a grant for placement and monitoring of at
least 20 and no more than 300 inbound students. Placements may be in
any region of the United States. Strong preference will be given to
organizations that choose to place participants in clusters of at least
three students (these students should be from different countries) in a
particular Local Coordinator's area of responsibility. Please refer to
the Solicitation Package for details on essential program elements,
permissible costs, and criteria used to select and place students. We
anticipate grants beginning no later than September 2010, subject to
the availability of funds.
Inbound participants begin to arrive in their host communities in
August 2011 and remain for 10 or 11 months until their departure mid-
May to early July 2012.
Administration of the program must be in compliance with reporting
and withholding regulations for federal, state, and local taxes as
applicable. Recipient organizations should demonstrate regulation
adherence in the proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health and accident insurance plans
they intend to use for students on this program. If use of a private
plan is proposed, the State Department will compare that plan with the
Bureau plan and make a determination as to which will be applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $9,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 12-15 grants.
[[Page 21134]]
Approximate Average Award: Funding level is dependent on the number
of proposed students, monitoring, the quality of support, and volume of
activities.
Anticipated Award Date: September 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: August 2012.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program, awardees' ability to comply with Federal Regulations and ECA
guidelines, and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years,
it is ECA's intent to renew this grant or cooperative agreement for two
additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with fewer than
four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited
to $60,000 in Bureau funding. Since an award to support program and
administrative costs required to implement this exchange program for a
minimum of 20 students will exceed $60,000, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in
support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact The Office of Youth Programs, ECA/PE/C/PY, SA-5,
Floor 3, U.S. Department of State, 2200 C St., NW., Washington, DC
20522-0503, telephone (202) 632-6065, and fax (202) 632-9355, e-mail
Matt O'Rourke at ORourkeMM@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package.
Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-10-07
located at the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further
information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also
contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific information, award criteria and
budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY-10-07)
at the top of this announcement on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via the Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) for additional formatting
and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your
[[Page 21135]]
organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past
four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will be third
parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of
the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient organizations shall
be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance
with'' 22 CFR 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization
receiving an award under this competition will render all assistance
necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR 62.
If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange
Visitor Program Sponsor, you should discuss your record of compliance
with 22 CFR 62 et seq., including the oversight of Responsible Officers
and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
ECA will review the record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq. of
applicant organizations designated as Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors
by ECA's Office of Private Sector Exchange as one factor in evaluating
the record/ability of organizations to carry out successful exchange
programs.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA-5,
Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
`Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
Funds provided through this award may not be used to promote
participation in, or to purchase equipment or supplies intended for,
activities related to religious worship or proselytization. Host
families, school officials, and grantee organizations shall not require
program participants to attend religious services. However, as part of
their exchange experience, participants may be offered the opportunity
to take part voluntarily in this facet of their host culture, at their
own discretion. Volunteer host families (who receive no financial
benefit from grant funds) are encouraged to enable participants living
with them to attend services of the participant's religion, if the
participant so desires and the services are available within a
reasonable distance of the host family's residence.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the recipient organization will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction
with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out
[[Page 21136]]
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term
outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The budget must reflect costs for a minimum of 20 and
no more than 300 YES Inbound participants. Please indicate clearly the
number of students funded. There must be a summary budget as well as
breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Any/all sub-awards/agreements including accompanying
budgets required to accomplish overall program objectives described
herein, shall be submitted with the proposal package and must be
approved by the Grants Officer, prior to commencement.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 3, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-07.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to
include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an
envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and ten (10) copies of the application should be sent
to: Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-
07, SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20522-0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on CD-ROM to the
program officer at BakerKM1@state.gov. As appropriate, the Bureau will
provide these files electronically to Public Affairs Section(s) at the
U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant timeliness
of submission or data errors resulting from transmission or conversion
processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
[[Page 21137]]
well in advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission
or conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800 -518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. In addition,
ECA will review the record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq. of
applicant organizations designated as Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors
by ECA's Office of Private Sector Exchange. If it is determined that an
applicant organization submitting a proposal has a record of not being
in compliance, their proposal will be deemed technically ineligible and
receive no further consideration in the review process. If in
compliance, the applicant organization's record of compliance will be
used as one factor in evaluating the record/ability of organizations to
carry out successful exchange programs.
All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as
well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate.
Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels
for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of
the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding
decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant
Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical
authority for assistance awards grants resides with the Bureau's Grants
Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning/Ability To Achieve Program Objectives:
Your proposal narrative should exhibit originality, substance, and
relevance to the Bureau's mission. Reviewers will assess the degree to
which proposals engage participants in community activities that
involve skills development and leadership training. A detailed agenda
and work plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines
described in the solicitation package. Reviewers will also assess the
degree to which the proposed outcomes of the project are realistic and
measurable. Strategies should creatively utilize resources at the local
level to ensure an efficient use of program funds.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, host families, schools, program venue, and program
evaluation) and program content (orientations, program meetings,
resource materials and follow-up activities).
3. Organization's Record/Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel
and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project's goals. Reviewers will assess the
applicant and its partners to determine if they offer adequate
resources, expertise, and experience to fulfill program objectives.
Partner activities should be clearly defined. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all
reporting and J-1 Visa requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grant Staff. In addition, organizations designated
as Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors must include a discussion of their
record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq., including the oversight of
their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-
arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of
participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements. Proposals that fail to include the
above information in their narrative will be deemed less or not
competitive under this review criterion. ECA will review the record of
compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq. of organizations designated as
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsors as one factor in evaluating the
record/ability of organizations to carry out successful exchange
programs.
4. Multiplier Effect: Proposed programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages.
Reviewers will assess ways in which proposals include innovative ideas
to expose U.S. communities to YES-related goals and activities that
involve students, host families and schools. This includes media
outreach, visits to local and national government representatives,
Internet-based applications and other interactions. Reviewers will also
evaluate substantive plans to prepare YES students for their role as
active, effective YES alumni.
5. Participant Monitoring: Proposals must include a detailed
monitoring plan, which addresses Student, Local Coordinator (LC) and
Host Family (HF) monitoring. Given the importance the Department places
on this criterion, you should dedicate a significant percentage of the
narrative to explaining how you will achieve the Department's goals in
regard to monitoring the health, safety and welfare of program
participants. You may use the appendices to house additional details
and supporting documentation. Please see the Project Objectives, Goals,
and Implementation (POGI) for additional details regarding this review
criterion.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to monitor
and
[[Page 21138]]
evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. Reviewers will assess your plans to monitor
student progress and program activities, particularly in regard to
intended outcomes indicated in your proposal. Grantees will be expected
to submit quarterly reports, which should be included as an inherent
component of the work plan.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost sharing: Reviewers will analyze the
budget for clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will also assess the
rationale of the proposed budget and whether the allocation of funds is
appropriate to complete tasks outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other
items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize
cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding contributions. Preference will be given to
organizations whose proposals demonstrate a quality, cost-effective
program.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award.
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available
to the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include
both quantitative and qualitative data you have available.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.)
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Kevin Baker, Office
of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, SA-5, Floor 3, Department of State,
2200 C St., NW., Washington, DC 20522-0503. Telephone: (202) 632-6073;
E-mail: BakerKM1@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above contact and ECA/PE/C/PY-10-07.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-9322 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P