Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 20849-20850 [2010-9202]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 21, 2010 / Notices Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 16, 2010. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2010–9164 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–S FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center Web site at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 4, 2010. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291: 1. Lake Central Financial, Inc., Annandale, Minnesota; to directly engage, de novo in extending credit and servicing loans pursuant to section 225.25(b)(1) of Regulation Y. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 16, 2010. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2010–9165 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–S VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:33 Apr 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)–523–5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. Agreement No.: 010977–063. Title: Hispaniola Discussion Agreement. Parties: Crowley Liner Services and Seaboard Marine Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment terminates the general authorities of the Agreement effective May 31, 2010, but allows the parties to continue their Agreement service contracts obligations through June 30, 2010 on which date the Agreement will be terminated in its entirety. Agreement No.: 011075–073. Title: Central America Discussion Agreement. Parties: APL Co. PTE Ltd.; Crowley Latin America Services, LLC.; Dole Ocean Cargo Express; Great White Fleet; King Ocean Services Limited; and Seaboard Marine, Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment adds the Dominican Republic and Haiti to the geographic scope of the Agreement. Agreement No.: 011830–008. Title: Indamex Cross Space Charter, Sailing and Cooperative Working Agreement. Parties: APL Co. Pte Ltd; American President Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; Orient Overseas Container Line Limited. Filing Parties: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment authorizes the deployment of an eighth vessel, makes conforming revisions to the forgoing, and adds Savannah to the port rotation. Agreement No.: 012094. Title: Tropical Shipping & Construction Co., Ltd. and United Abaco Shipping Company Limited Slot Charter and Sailing Agreement. PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20849 Parties: Tropical Shipping & Construction Co., Ltd. and United Abaco Shipping Company Limited. Filing Parties: Neal M. Mayer, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 Connecticut Avenue NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Tropical and United Abaco to charter slots to one another on an ‘‘as needed, as available’’ basis in the trade between ports on the East Coast of Florida and ports in the Bahamas. By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. Dated: April 16, 2010. Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–9200 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–10–0816] Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–5960 and send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar, CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1 20850 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 21, 2010 / Notices Proposed Project ‘‘Youth Knowledge, Attitudes, and Feedback to Inform Choose Respect Implementation’’ (OMB no. 0920–0816 exp. 6/30/2012)—Revision—National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description A revision of approved OMB# 0920– 0816 is requested to reflect adjustments in the age of youth who will participate in the focus group studies and surveys (11–14 will become 11–18). The revision requests permission to ask knowledge and attitude questions at some of the focus groups. Over a three-year period, NCIPC seeks to understand youths’ (ages 11 to 18) knowledge and attitudes regarding healthy and unhealthy relationships, and obtain their feedback regarding message development/placement, creative executions, appropriate partners, and other similar issues, to inform ongoing implementation and evaluation of the Choose Respect campaign, an initiative intended to promote youth awareness of and participation in healthy dating relationships. Communication research indicates that campaign planning implementation must employ a consumer-oriented approach to ensure that program messages/materials, and their placement, can successfully gain the attention of and resonate with the intended audience. To that end, the NCIPC proposes conducting further planning, implementation, and evaluation research that enlists the involvement and support of youth. The proposed information collection will inform message and materials development and provide interim and ongoing feedback to campaign planners regarding the implementation and progress of the campaign. The proposed data collection will enlist geographically, culturally/ racially/ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse groups of young people to complete: (1) Ten-minute online surveys, with 200 respondents, up to four times per year; and (2) up to 36 in-person focus groups, with up to eight participants each (or more smaller discussion groups with fewer people per group), twice per year. Online surveys will reduce the potential burden for young people as Web-based formats are convenient and consistent with the way they communicate and spend their leisure time. Online surveys—Each Web-based survey will involve a different group of tweens/teens. The burden table shows time to screen parents and youth, as well as the actual time to complete the survey (rows 4–6). In-person focus groups—First and second focus groups will involve different groups of young people. The focus groups will be segmented by age and gender, as indicated. Other variables for segmentation may include, but not be limited to, geography, language, and culture/race/ethnicity. The burden table shows time to screen parents and youth, as well as the actual time for focus groups and a waiting room survey (rows 1–3). The assumption is that two parental contacts will be needed to successfully recruit one respondent for each type of study. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondent Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) Total burden hours Type of respondents Data collection type Parents of boys and girls, ages 11 to 18 and youth ages 11 to 18. Youths ages 11 to 18 ....................... Youths ages 11 to 18 ....................... 576 2 5/60 96 288 288 2 2 5/60 1.5 48 864 400 4 5/60 133 400 4 3/60 80 Youths ages 11 to 18 ....................... Focus Group Screening Instrument for Parents and Youth. Focus Group Waiting Room Survey Focus Group Moderator’s Guide (participation in focus group). Online Survey Email Invitation AND Online Survey Screening Instrument for Parents. Online Survey Screening Instrument for Youth. Online Survey ................................... 200 4 10/60 133 Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 1354 Parents of boys and girls, ages 11 to 18. Youths ages 11 to 18 ....................... Kimberly S. Lane, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–9202 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Title: Cross-Site Evaluation of the Children’s Bureau Grantee. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:33 Apr 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 Cluster: Supporting Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs to Prevent Child Maltreatment (EBHV). OMB No.: New Collection. Description The Administration for Children and Families (ACE), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is proposing this cross-site evaluation data collection activity to identify successful strategies for adopting, implementing, and sustaining high-quality home visitation programs to prevent child maltreatment. An evaluation study will address four domains: (1) Systems change to develop infrastructure, (2) fidelity to evidence-based models, (3) PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 costs of home visiting programs, and (4) family and child outcomes (via a review of grantee analysis reports). A process study will focus on the broader grant initiative to understand how programs plan and develop the infrastructure needed to support home visitation services and how they ensure service quality. Information will be collected through biennial site visits, web based data entry, a data quality progress table, a relationship questionnaire completed by participants and home visitors, and a grantee-partner network survey. In particular, site visits will include interviews with key grantee staff and E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20849-20850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9202]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-10-0816]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on 
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. 
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a 
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-5960 
and send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar, CDC Acting Reports Clearance 
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail 
to omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received 
within 60 days of this notice.

[[Page 20850]]

Proposed Project

    ``Youth Knowledge, Attitudes, and Feedback to Inform Choose Respect 
Implementation'' (OMB no. 0920-0816 exp. 6/30/2012)--Revision--National 
Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    A revision of approved OMB 0920-0816 is requested to 
reflect adjustments in the age of youth who will participate in the 
focus group studies and surveys (11-14 will become 11-18). The revision 
requests permission to ask knowledge and attitude questions at some of 
the focus groups.
    Over a three-year period, NCIPC seeks to understand youths' (ages 
11 to 18) knowledge and attitudes regarding healthy and unhealthy 
relationships, and obtain their feedback regarding message development/
placement, creative executions, appropriate partners, and other similar 
issues, to inform ongoing implementation and evaluation of the Choose 
Respect campaign, an initiative intended to promote youth awareness of 
and participation in healthy dating relationships. Communication 
research indicates that campaign planning implementation must employ a 
consumer-oriented approach to ensure that program messages/materials, 
and their placement, can successfully gain the attention of and 
resonate with the intended audience. To that end, the NCIPC proposes 
conducting further planning, implementation, and evaluation research 
that enlists the involvement and support of youth. The proposed 
information collection will inform message and materials development 
and provide interim and ongoing feedback to campaign planners regarding 
the implementation and progress of the campaign.
    The proposed data collection will enlist geographically, 
culturally/racially/ethnically, and socio-economically diverse groups 
of young people to complete: (1) Ten-minute online surveys, with 200 
respondents, up to four times per year; and (2) up to 36 in-person 
focus groups, with up to eight participants each (or more smaller 
discussion groups with fewer people per group), twice per year. Online 
surveys will reduce the potential burden for young people as Web-based 
formats are convenient and consistent with the way they communicate and 
spend their leisure time.
    Online surveys--Each Web-based survey will involve a different 
group of tweens/teens. The burden table shows time to screen parents 
and youth, as well as the actual time to complete the survey (rows 4-
6).
    In-person focus groups--First and second focus groups will involve 
different groups of young people. The focus groups will be segmented by 
age and gender, as indicated. Other variables for segmentation may 
include, but not be limited to, geography, language, and culture/race/
ethnicity. The burden table shows time to screen parents and youth, as 
well as the actual time for focus groups and a waiting room survey 
(rows 1-3). The assumption is that two parental contacts will be needed 
to successfully recruit one respondent for each type of study. There 
are no costs to respondents other than their time.

                                       Estimate of Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden
      Type of respondents        Data collection     Number of     responses per   per response    Total burden
                                      type          respondent      respondent      (in hours)         hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parents of boys and girls,      Focus Group                  576               2            5/60              96
 ages 11 to 18 and youth ages    Screening
 11 to 18.                       Instrument for
                                 Parents and
                                 Youth.
Youths ages 11 to 18..........  Focus Group                  288               2            5/60              48
                                 Waiting Room
                                 Survey.
Youths ages 11 to 18..........  Focus Group                  288               2             1.5             864
                                 Moderator's
                                 Guide
                                 (participation
                                 in focus group).
Parents of boys and girls,      Online Survey                400               4            5/60             133
 ages 11 to 18.                  Email
                                 Invitation AND
                                 Online Survey
                                 Screening
                                 Instrument for
                                 Parents.
Youths ages 11 to 18..........  Online Survey                400               4            3/60              80
                                 Screening
                                 Instrument for
                                 Youth.
Youths ages 11 to 18..........  Online Survey...             200               4           10/60             133
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ................  ..............  ..............  ..............            1354
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kimberly S. Lane,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-9202 Filed 4-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.