Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: smART Power: Visual Arts, 20656-20663 [2010-9076]
Download as PDF
20656
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
for viewing and download at the project
Web site: https://www.keystonepipelinexl.state.gov.
For information on the proposed
project or the draft EIS contact Elizabeth
Orlando, OES/ENV Room 2657, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC,
20520, or by telephone (202) 647–4284,
or by fax at (202) 647–1052.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 16,
2010.
Willem Brakel,
Director, Bureau of Oceans and International
Environmental and Scientific Affairs/Office
of Environmental Policy, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9075 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 6957]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: smART Power: Visual Arts
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C–CU–10–50.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 26, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Cultural
Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
announces an open competition for one
award to administer the ‘‘smART Power:
Visual Arts’’ program. Under the
‘‘smART Power: Visual Arts’’ program,
the Bureau seeks an organization
capable of soliciting, selecting, and
facilitating approximately ten (10) to
thirty (30) collaborative visual arts
projects, whereby U.S. visual artists will
travel abroad to engage with foreign
audiences for periods of approximately
six to twelve weeks each.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The overall objective of the
‘‘smART Power: Visual Arts’’ program is
to support the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs’ mission to increase
mutual understanding between the
peoples of the United States and other
countries, emphasizing shared social
and cultural values. The program will
showcase the role of visual artists as
vibrant, engaged, and innovative
partners in addressing the broader social
issues important to communities
worldwide. International audiences will
have an opportunity to engage with
American artists and learn about our
country’s cultural history as well as the
contemporary cultural scene. The
American artists will themselves learn
about the societies and cultures of the
foreign host countries.
The ‘‘smART Power: Visual Arts’’
program will administer projects where
U.S. artists travel to foreign locales and
collaborate with local individuals and
communities to create works of art.
Projects will be designed to stimulate
discourse about local or global social
issues including, but not limited to the
environment, education, health, girls’/
women’s issues, and freedom of
expression. Approved projects will
focus on direct community engagement
that encourages dialogue,
experimentation, and creativity.
Participating U.S. artists and foreign
communities will have an opportunity
to strengthen connections and create
long-term relationships through the
mutual engagement fostered by the art
projects. U.S. missions will benefit from
these projects by enhancing their ties
with the American artists as well as
with the local audiences they serve.
Guidelines: The award period will
begin approximately August 31, 2010,
and continue through December 31,
2012. ECA intends to award one
cooperative agreement to a qualified
institution or organization to administer
the ‘‘smART Power: Visual Arts’’
program globally. The cooperative
agreement will support the organization
and implementation of approximately
ten (10) to thirty (30) art projects.
All applications must be submitted by
public or private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 USD 501(c)(3). All artists
selected must be U.S. citizens. Total
funding for this competition is $1
million. Please Note: The Bureau
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reserves the right to reallocate funds it
has initially allocated to this
competition, based upon factors such as
the number of applications received and
responsiveness to the review criteria
outlined. No guarantee is made or
implied that a grant will be awarded for
projects to any particular region.
The successful applicant for the
cooperative agreement will organize the
selection of approximately ten (10) to
thirty (30) visual arts projects to be
implemented abroad for periods of
approximately six (6) to twelve (12)
weeks each, as well as manage the
administration of the program
throughout the award period.
Proposals should reflect a practical
understanding of global issues, and
demonstrate sensitivity to cultural,
political, economic and social
differences in regions where projects
may take place. Special attention should
be given to describing the applicant
organization’s experience with planning
and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical scenarios
abroad. Applicants should identify any
U.S. and foreign partner organizations
and/or venues with whom they are
proposing to collaborate, and describe
previous cooperative projects to
demonstrate their institutional capacity.
Projects will take place in countries to
be designated by ECA and should
primarily target and engage youth,
underserved, and diverse populations,
including Muslim and indigenous
populations, as well as educators or
groups that influence youth.
Award proposals should contain a
detailed plan to work with ECA to
identify and recruit U.S. visual artists to
participate in the program, as well as a
process for soliciting and reviewing
proposals submitted by the U.S. artists
through a competition for specific
overseas projects. It is anticipated that
no more than six months will be
required to identify the first group of
U.S. artists and solicit, review and select
project proposals. Selected projects will
be announced in or about February
2011, and project activities will be
conducted and concluded by December
31, 2012.
The U.S. visual artists to be selected
for specific projects must demonstrate
high artistic ability, excellent
interpersonal skills, and be conversant
with the broader aspects of
contemporary American society and
culture. In addition to creating works of
art, artists will conduct workshops,
teach master classes, and perform other
outreach activities.
Individual art projects deemed
competitive under these programs
should include the following elements:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
• Dynamic public outreach, including
a collaborative art project(s) with foreign
community members, especially with
youth and/or underserved or
underprivileged populations.
• A description of how U.S. artists
and foreign communities will benefit
from participating in the projects; how
the projects will stimulate public
discourse and explore local or global
social issues.
• A description of how U.S. artists,
through their projects can encourage
dialogue, experimentation, and
creativity.
The award recipient’s activities and
responsibilities for these programs are
as follows:
• Design and implementation of a
process for openly soliciting
applications from U.S. visual artists for
international projects subject to ECA
final approval.
• Design and implementation of a
transparent process for reviewing and
selecting proposals using criteria
approved by ECA. Criteria may include,
but are not limited to elements such as
artistic quality/excellence of U.S. artist;
U.S. artist experience with public
outreach and foreign audiences;
appropriateness of the project for the
foreign policy context and objectives;
opportunities for local outreach.
• Organization of procedures and
events for announcing ECA’s final
decisions on proposals, including media
coverage as appropriate.
• Advance project planning
(including educational and outreach
activities);
• Project implementation and
monitoring;
• Processing and funding all
administrative aspects of each project,
including but not limited to
disbursement of moneys to U.S. artists,
travel arrangements, visas,
immunizations, health insurance,
purchase and shipment of supplies,
payments and other applicable logistical
elements.
• Arrangement of orientation sessions
and pre-travel briefings for each artist or
group of artists with State Department
regional experts and ECA program
officers in attendance. In the event a
personal briefing session is not possible,
a teleconference briefing should be
scheduled.
• Production of logo and press and
other materials to be used in outreach
and program branding.
• Publicizing program activities and
results to targeted U.S. and international
media in a consultation with ECA, and,
as applicable, the Public Affairs
Sections of U.S. missions, and
participating artists.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Liaison and coordination with U.S.
Missions and local foreign
organizations, as appropriate;
• Evaluation of program activities;
• Reporting on project activities to
ECA within one month of completion of
project;
• Assisting artists and embassies with
follow-on program development.
Successful applicants must be highly
responsive and able to work in close
consultation with ECA and the Public
Affairs Sections of participating U.S.
embassies overseas. Applicants should
also have experience in global exchange
planning and implementation, and
should state how they intend to address
the above elements in their proposal,
particularly the specific procedures and
criteria for the selection of American
artists.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/
C/CU is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU’s
activities and responsibilities for these
programs are as follows:
• Determination of the countries for
which projects will be selected.
Countries will be those in all world
regions of greatest importance to the
Department of State’s public diplomacy
mission to build mutual understanding.
Examples of countries where projects
may take place include Egypt,
Venezuela, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Thailand, Syria and Russia. These are
examples for purposes of the
competition. ECA reserves the right to
select participating countries based
upon the overall policy priorities of the
Department of State during the course of
the cooperative agreement.
• Participation in the selection of
artists and projects.
• Final approval of all projects and
project arrangements.
• Arranging for participation of
Department of State officers in pretravel briefings and any debriefings that
might take place.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 31,
2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
December 31, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20657
Additional Information
Pending successful implementation of
this program and the availability of
funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA’s intent to renew the cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making one award, in an
amount up to $1,000,000, to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All
proposals must comply with: (1) Full
adherence to the guidelines stated
herein and in the Solicitation Package;
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20658
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
(2) proposal submission deadline; and
(3) non-profit organization status, or
your proposal will be declared
technically ineligible and given no
further consideration in the review
process.
Applicants may submit only ONE
proposal to administer the listed
activities/programs. If more than one
proposal is received from the same
applicant, all submissions will be
declared technically ineligible and will
receive no further consideration in the
review process. Please Note: Applicant
organizations are defined by their legal
name, and EIN number as stated on
their completed SF–424 and additional
supporting documentation outlined in
the Proposal Submission Instructions
(PSI) document.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Cultural Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/CU) in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational Affairs, U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, 2200 C Street, NW., 3rd
Floor, Washington, DC 20522–0503; tel
202–632–6425; fax 202–632–9355;
e-mail StaplesCD@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C–CU–10–50 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from awards.gov. Please see section
IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Alan Cross and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/
PE/C–CU–10–50 located at the top of
this announcement and ‘‘smART Power:
Visual Arts’’ on all other inquiries and
correspondence related to that program.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
awards/open2.html, or from the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call
1–866–705–5711. Please ensure that
your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, the award recipient will
also be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from its program
reports, listing and describing its award
activities. For the award recipient, the
names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of award activities,
will be transmitted by the State
Department to OMB, along with other
information required by the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Funding Accountability and
Transparency Act (FFATA), and will be
made available to the public by the
Office of Management and Budget on its
USASpending.gov website as part of
ECA’s FFATA reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The following is for informational
purposes only and is not directly
relevant to this solicitation. The Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs
places critically important emphases on
the security and proper administration
of the Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by award recipients and
sponsors to all regulations governing the
J visa.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, Office of Designation,
ECA/EC/D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522–0582.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the recipient organization
will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, demonstrating
concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater
participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and
explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts
between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please Note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be
required to provide reports analyzing its
evaluation findings to the Bureau in its
regular program reports. All data
collected, including survey responses
and contact information, must be
maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e.
sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other requirements
etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20659
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The award may not exceed
$1,000,000. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Program Expenses, including but
not limited to: Domestic and
international travel for the selected
artists (per The Fly America Act); visas
and immunizations; airport taxes and
country entrance fees; honoraria;
educational and project materials and
presentation items; excess and
overweight baggage fees; press kits and
promotional materials; follow-on
activities; monitoring and evaluation;
and international travel for program
implementation and/or evaluation
purposes.
The following guidelines may be
helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International airfares
(per The Fly America Act), transit costs,
ground transportation, and visas for
participating artists to travel to the
project destinations.
B. Per Diem: Domestic per diem rates
may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/
Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?contentId=17943&
contentType=GSA_BASIC. Foreign per
diem rates may be accessed at: https://
aoprals.state.gov/content.asp?
content_id=184&menu_id=78.
C. Sub-awardees and Consultants.
Sub-awardee organizations may be used,
in which case the written agreement
between the prospective award recipient
and sub-awardee should be included in
the proposal. Sub-awards must be
itemized in the budget under General
Program Expenses. Consultants may be
used to provide specialized expertise.
Daily honoraria cannot exceed $200 per
day, and applicants are strongly
encouraged to use organizational
resources, and to cost share heavily in
this area.
D. Health Insurance. Each
participating artist will be covered
under the terms of the ECA-sponsored
Accident and Sickness Program for
Exchanges (ASPE) health insurance
program. The cost for international
travel insurance for staff travel may be
included in the proposal budget.
E. Honoraria for participating artists.
Daily honorarium is $200 per day for
each artist.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
20660
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
F. Educational Material and
Promotional Items. Artists may use
these funds to purchase project material
and promotional items whether in the
U.S. or abroad. ECA funds for
educational and promotional items (e.g.
CDS, DVDS, catalogues, brochures, etc.)
should be tailored to meet the needs of
the project and be proportional to the
overall project cost. Material costs may
be subject to change once actual projects
are scheduled; however, for proposal
budget purposes, costs should be
estimated at $1,000 per project.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage
costs are based on the size and weight
of art materials and supplies. Excess
baggage estimates may be subject to
change once actual projects are
scheduled; however for proposal budget
purposes, costs should be estimated at
$500 per visual arts project.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes
of a proposed budget, line items for
immunizations should be estimated at
$400 per artist, and visas/visa photos
should be estimated at $200 per artist.
I. Press Kits. As appropriate, based on
the project and foreign country, the
award recipient should design and
create press kits in consultation with
ECA. This line item may include funds
for designing and publishing print
materials and/or CD’s, DVD’s.
J. Staff Travel. Allowable costs
include domestic staff travel for one
staff member to meet with subawardees. International staff travel will
be allowable, especially if associated
with monitoring and evaluation, as long
as costs for each project are completely
covered. Cost-sharing for staff travel is
strongly encouraged.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs
necessary for the effective
administration of the program may
include salaries for award recipient
organization employees, benefits, and
other direct and indirect costs per
detailed instructions in the Solicitation
Package. While there is no rigid ratio of
administrative to program costs,
proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested from ECA award funds will be
more competitive on cost effectiveness.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: May 26,
2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU–
10–50.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the
SF–424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important Note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and ten copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/PE/C/CU–10–50, SA–5, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20522–0504.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility
for applicant timeliness of submission or data
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes for proposals submitted
via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.Grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the website. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via grants.gov can take up to two
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3f.3 Only one application may be
submitted by an organization.
Submission of more than one
application will automatically
disqualify that organization for all
applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications Executive Order 12372
Does Not Apply to This Program
V. Application Review Information
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives: Proposals should
exhibit originality, substance and
precision. The program plan should
state the project’s relevance to the U.S.
Department of State’s foreign policy
goals. Program objectives should be
stated clearly and should reflect the
organization’s expertise in the visual
arts and in the area of community
outreach. Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Detailed agenda and plan should adhere
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
to the program overview and guidelines
described above. Proposals should
include a detailed timeline/agenda for
accomplishing all of the program
activities including application phases,
participant selection, project
implementation and project monitoring.
2. Institutional Capacity/Record:
Proposals should include the
institution’s mission and date that
501(c) 3 status was approved. Proposals
should reflect institution’s expertise in
the subject areas, knowledge of
conditions overseas, and expertise in
planning programs that strengthen
connections between the United States
and other countries. Proposed personnel
and institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project’s goals.
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau awards
(grants or cooperative agreements) as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Institutions with previous
successful experience in conducting
exchange programs with the U.S.
Government will be deemed more
competitive. Proposals must include
references with name and contact
information for other assistance awards
the applicant has received in the event
the Bureau chooses to be in touch
directly.
The Bureau strongly encourages
submission of letters of support and
commitment from proposed partner
organizations.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages. Proposals
should demonstrate a clear
understanding of how the individual art
projects can have a long lasting impact
on the foreign community.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
5. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan to conduct
activities after the Bureau-funded
project has concluded in order to ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20661
that Bureau-supported programs are not
isolated events. Post-award activities
must be funded by contributions from
sources outside the Bureau. Costs for
these activities should not appear in the
proposal budget, but should be outlined
in the narrative.
6. Project Monitoring and Evaluation:
Proposals should include a detailed
plan to monitor and evaluate the
program. Competitive evaluation plans
will describe how the project’s success
at meeting program objectives in
quantitative terms will be measured,
and should include draft data collection
instruments such as surveys and
questionnaires, media coverage, and
other significant local reaction to
specific projects. Proposals should
include a plan to evaluate the activities’
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. ECA is
especially interested in the qualitative
and quantitative results of project
activities both in terms of the impact on
audiences, as well as on participants. It
will be the award recipient’s
responsibility to inform the Bureau of
exchange activity results and changes to
the program plan and/or project
timeline.
7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost
Sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals
should maximize cost-sharing through
other private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. In the event programming
involves Iran, West Bank and Gaza, the
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20662
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
following additional requirements may
apply: A critical component of current
U.S. government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices.
The State Department has made the
awarding of awards for this purpose a
key component of its Iran policy. As a
condition of licensing these activities,
the Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC) has requested the Department of
State to follow certain procedures to
effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B;
Executive Order 13224; and Homeland
Security Presidential Directive 6. These
licensing conditions mandate that the
Department conduct a vetting of
potential Iran awardees and subawardees for counter-terrorism
purposes. To conduct this vetting the
Department will collect information
from awardees and sub-awardees
regarding the identity and background
of their key employees and Boards of
Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact Catherine
Staples-Randolph at 202–632–6425 or
StaplesCD@state.gov for additional
information.
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Catherine Staples-Randolph at 202–632–6425
or StaplesCD@state.gov for additional
information.
Special Provision for Performance in a
Designated Combat Area (Currently Iraq
and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to
areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense
(currently Iraq and Afghanistan), under
assistance awards over $100,000 or
performance over 14 days must register
in the Department of Defense
maintained Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker
(SPOT) system. Recipients of federal
assistance awards shall register in SPOT
before deployment, or if already in the
designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the
assistance award, and maintain current
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
data in SPOT. Information on how to
register in SPOT will be available from
your Grants Officer or Grants Officer
Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the
federal assistance awards process.
Recipients of federal assistance awards
are advised that adherence to this policy
and procedure will be a requirement of
all final federal assistance awards issued
by ECA.
Recipient performance may require
the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such
private security contractors (PSCs) are
required, awardees are required to
ensure they adhere to Chief of Mission
(COM) policies and procedures
regarding the operation, oversight, and
accountability of PSCs.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
awards.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3 Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus ten copies of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov website—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial
reports that include final costs for each
visual arts project and remaining award
funds for additional projects.
(5) During the period of
implementation of each visual arts
project, bi-weekly reports to the ECA
program office that include
photographs, any media coverage and
information on substantive elements of
the project.
(6) No more than two weeks following
conclusion of each visual arts project, a
report and evaluation of the substantive
aspects of the project (including budget)
to the ECA program office.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Program Data Requirements
The award recipient will be required
to maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
requested. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the agreement.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general (non-substantive)
questions about this announcement,
contact: Catherine Staples-Randolph at
202–632–6425 or StaplesCD@state.gov.
For specific (substantive) questions
about the ‘‘smART Power: Visual Arts’’
program, contact: Alan Cross, Cultural
Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU),
Room 3–K14, ECA/PE/C–CU–10–50,
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
U.S. Department of State, SA–5, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522–
0503; tel 202–632–6407; fax 202–632–
9355; e-mail CrossA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C–
CU–10–50 and the specific program
being requested.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2010–9076 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 6958]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: TechWomen
Announcement Type: Cooperative
Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C–10–55.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415
DATES: Key Dates:
Application Deadline: June 2, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for
‘‘TechWomen’’. Public and private nonprofit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
conduct a professional mentorship
exchange program. This initiative
champions two distinct but key themes
of President Obama’s June 2009 speech
in Cairo by supporting development in
the field of technology and enabling
women to reach their full potential in
the technology industry. Applicants
should plan to recruit and select a total
of approximately 20–40 women from
Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon,
Morocco, the West Bank and Gaza to
participate in a four- to six-week peer
mentoring program in the United States.
The mentoring experience will focus on
bolstering the status of professional
women in the field of technology, will
provide networking opportunities for
the participants, and will support
activities in the participants’ home
countries that encourage the interest of
girls in technology-based careers.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries* * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations* * *and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
The project ‘‘TechWomen’’ will link
approximately 20–40 emerging female
leaders from Algeria, Egypt, Jordan,
Lebanon, Morocco, the West Bank and
Gaza, who have at least two years of
professional experience in the field of
technology, with female peer mentors in
the United States for a four- to six-week
mentorship program. A smaller number
of select American experts will then
travel to the foreign participants’ home
region to offer skills development
sessions and workshops for a broader
range of local participants. The program
is designed to reach beyond the
exchange by serving as the basis for an
international professional support
network for women working in the field
of technology both within and outside
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20663
of each participant’s home country.
Participants will also have access to the
community of alumni from previous
State Department sponsored exchange
programs.
Applicants must identify the U.S. and
foreign organizations and individuals
with whom they are proposing to
collaborate both to secure mentorships
in the United States, to recruit and
select participants overseas, and to
implement follow-on workshops
conducted by American experts in
certain of the participants’ home
countries. Proposals should contain
letters of commitment or support from
partner organizations for the proposed
mentorships, and for the follow-on
workshops overseas. A description of
any previous cooperative activities with
these partner organizations must be
included in the proposal, along with
information about their mission,
activities, and accomplishments.
Applicants should clearly outline and
describe the roles and responsibilities of
all partner organizations in terms of
project logistics, management and
oversight.
Competitive proposals will include
the following:
• A proposed timeline detailing
potential activities and project goals;
• A description of the recruitment
and selection processes of participants
from Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon,
Morocco, the West Bank and Gaza;
• A description of U.S.-based
activities, including the securing of
mentorships and mentors in American
companies; monitoring and support of
participants during the mentorship; a
group orientation; and a debriefing/
evaluation session at the conclusion of
the program;
• A description of the workshops,
seminars and/or other activities
conducted by the American experts
overseas;
• Letters of commitment from U.S.
partners to serve as possible host
mentoring sites;
• A description of the applicant
organization’s relevant expertise in the
project area and working with
participants or organizations from
eligible countries;
• A description of relevant
experience managing previous exchange
and/or mentoring programs;
• Resumes of experienced staff who
have demonstrated a commitment to
implement and monitor projects and
ensure outcomes;
• A comprehensive plan to evaluate
whether program outcomes will achieve
the specific objectives described in the
narrative;
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20656-20663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9076]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 6957]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: smART Power: Visual Arts
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C-CU-10-50.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 26, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Cultural Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
(ECA) announces an open competition for one award to administer the
``smART Power: Visual Arts'' program. Under the ``smART Power: Visual
Arts'' program, the Bureau seeks an organization capable of soliciting,
selecting, and facilitating approximately ten (10) to thirty (30)
collaborative visual arts projects, whereby U.S. visual artists will
travel abroad to engage with foreign audiences for periods of
approximately six to twelve weeks each.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The overall objective of the ``smART Power: Visual Arts''
program is to support the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs'
mission to increase mutual understanding between the peoples of the
United States and other countries, emphasizing shared social and
cultural values. The program will showcase the role of visual artists
as vibrant, engaged, and innovative partners in addressing the broader
social issues important to communities worldwide. International
audiences will have an opportunity to engage with American artists and
learn about our country's cultural history as well as the contemporary
cultural scene. The American artists will themselves learn about the
societies and cultures of the foreign host countries.
The ``smART Power: Visual Arts'' program will administer projects
where U.S. artists travel to foreign locales and collaborate with local
individuals and communities to create works of art. Projects will be
designed to stimulate discourse about local or global social issues
including, but not limited to the environment, education, health,
girls'/women's issues, and freedom of expression. Approved projects
will focus on direct community engagement that encourages dialogue,
experimentation, and creativity. Participating U.S. artists and foreign
communities will have an opportunity to strengthen connections and
create long-term relationships through the mutual engagement fostered
by the art projects. U.S. missions will benefit from these projects by
enhancing their ties with the American artists as well as with the
local audiences they serve.
Guidelines: The award period will begin approximately August 31,
2010, and continue through December 31, 2012. ECA intends to award one
cooperative agreement to a qualified institution or organization to
administer the ``smART Power: Visual Arts'' program globally. The
cooperative agreement will support the organization and implementation
of approximately ten (10) to thirty (30) art projects.
All applications must be submitted by public or private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 USD 501(c)(3). All artists selected must be U.S. citizens.
Total funding for this competition is $1 million. Please Note: The
Bureau reserves the right to reallocate funds it has initially
allocated to this competition, based upon factors such as the number of
applications received and responsiveness to the review criteria
outlined. No guarantee is made or implied that a grant will be awarded
for projects to any particular region.
The successful applicant for the cooperative agreement will
organize the selection of approximately ten (10) to thirty (30) visual
arts projects to be implemented abroad for periods of approximately six
(6) to twelve (12) weeks each, as well as manage the administration of
the program throughout the award period.
Proposals should reflect a practical understanding of global
issues, and demonstrate sensitivity to cultural, political, economic
and social differences in regions where projects may take place.
Special attention should be given to describing the applicant
organization's experience with planning and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical scenarios abroad. Applicants should identify
any U.S. and foreign partner organizations and/or venues with whom they
are proposing to collaborate, and describe previous cooperative
projects to demonstrate their institutional capacity.
Projects will take place in countries to be designated by ECA and
should primarily target and engage youth, underserved, and diverse
populations, including Muslim and indigenous populations, as well as
educators or groups that influence youth.
Award proposals should contain a detailed plan to work with ECA to
identify and recruit U.S. visual artists to participate in the program,
as well as a process for soliciting and reviewing proposals submitted
by the U.S. artists through a competition for specific overseas
projects. It is anticipated that no more than six months will be
required to identify the first group of U.S. artists and solicit,
review and select project proposals. Selected projects will be
announced in or about February 2011, and project activities will be
conducted and concluded by December 31, 2012.
The U.S. visual artists to be selected for specific projects must
demonstrate high artistic ability, excellent interpersonal skills, and
be conversant with the broader aspects of contemporary American society
and culture. In addition to creating works of art, artists will conduct
workshops, teach master classes, and perform other outreach activities.
Individual art projects deemed competitive under these programs
should include the following elements:
[[Page 20657]]
Dynamic public outreach, including a collaborative art
project(s) with foreign community members, especially with youth and/or
underserved or underprivileged populations.
A description of how U.S. artists and foreign communities
will benefit from participating in the projects; how the projects will
stimulate public discourse and explore local or global social issues.
A description of how U.S. artists, through their projects
can encourage dialogue, experimentation, and creativity.
The award recipient's activities and responsibilities for these
programs are as follows:
Design and implementation of a process for openly
soliciting applications from U.S. visual artists for international
projects subject to ECA final approval.
Design and implementation of a transparent process for
reviewing and selecting proposals using criteria approved by ECA.
Criteria may include, but are not limited to elements such as artistic
quality/excellence of U.S. artist; U.S. artist experience with public
outreach and foreign audiences; appropriateness of the project for the
foreign policy context and objectives; opportunities for local
outreach.
Organization of procedures and events for announcing ECA's
final decisions on proposals, including media coverage as appropriate.
Advance project planning (including educational and
outreach activities);
Project implementation and monitoring;
Processing and funding all administrative aspects of each
project, including but not limited to disbursement of moneys to U.S.
artists, travel arrangements, visas, immunizations, health insurance,
purchase and shipment of supplies, payments and other applicable
logistical elements.
Arrangement of orientation sessions and pre-travel
briefings for each artist or group of artists with State Department
regional experts and ECA program officers in attendance. In the event a
personal briefing session is not possible, a teleconference briefing
should be scheduled.
Production of logo and press and other materials to be
used in outreach and program branding.
Publicizing program activities and results to targeted
U.S. and international media in a consultation with ECA, and, as
applicable, the Public Affairs Sections of U.S. missions, and
participating artists.
Liaison and coordination with U.S. Missions and local
foreign organizations, as appropriate;
Evaluation of program activities;
Reporting on project activities to ECA within one month of
completion of project;
Assisting artists and embassies with follow-on program
development.
Successful applicants must be highly responsive and able to work in
close consultation with ECA and the Public Affairs Sections of
participating U.S. embassies overseas. Applicants should also have
experience in global exchange planning and implementation, and should
state how they intend to address the above elements in their proposal,
particularly the specific procedures and criteria for the selection of
American artists.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is substantially involved
in program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/
CU's activities and responsibilities for these programs are as follows:
Determination of the countries for which projects will be
selected. Countries will be those in all world regions of greatest
importance to the Department of State's public diplomacy mission to
build mutual understanding. Examples of countries where projects may
take place include Egypt, Venezuela, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand,
Syria and Russia. These are examples for purposes of the competition.
ECA reserves the right to select participating countries based upon the
overall policy priorities of the Department of State during the course
of the cooperative agreement.
Participation in the selection of artists and projects.
Final approval of all projects and project arrangements.
Arranging for participation of Department of State
officers in pre-travel briefings and any debriefings that might take
place.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 31, 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2012.
Additional Information
Pending successful implementation of this program and the
availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA's intent to
renew the cooperative agreement for two additional fiscal years, before
openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award,
in an amount up to $1,000,000, to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with: (1)
Full adherence to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation
Package;
[[Page 20658]]
(2) proposal submission deadline; and (3) non-profit organization
status, or your proposal will be declared technically ineligible and
given no further consideration in the review process.
Applicants may submit only ONE proposal to administer the listed
activities/programs. If more than one proposal is received from the
same applicant, all submissions will be declared technically ineligible
and will receive no further consideration in the review process. Please
Note: Applicant organizations are defined by their legal name, and EIN
number as stated on their completed SF-424 and additional supporting
documentation outlined in the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package
Please contact the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU) in the
Office of Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of Educational Affairs, U.S.
Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., 3rd Floor, Washington,
DC 20522-0503; tel 202-632-6425; fax 202-632-9355; e-mail
StaplesCD@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-CU-10-50 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from awards.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Alan Cross and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C-CU-10-50 located at the top of this announcement and
``smART Power: Visual Arts'' on all other inquiries and correspondence
related to that program.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/awards/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, the award
recipient will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from its program reports, listing and describing its award activities.
For the award recipient, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of award activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov website as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The following is for informational purposes only and is not
directly relevant to this solicitation. The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically important emphases on the security
and proper administration of the Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and
adherence by award recipients and sponsors to all regulations governing
the J visa.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Office of Designation, ECA/
EC/D, SA-5, Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
`Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take
[[Page 20659]]
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the recipient organization will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction
with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, demonstrating concrete actions to apply
knowledge in work or community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation
of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between
participants, community members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please Note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be required to provide reports
analyzing its evaluation findings to the Bureau in its regular program
reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e. sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The award may not exceed $1,000,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Program Expenses, including but not limited to: Domestic and
international travel for the selected artists (per The Fly America
Act); visas and immunizations; airport taxes and country entrance fees;
honoraria; educational and project materials and presentation items;
excess and overweight baggage fees; press kits and promotional
materials; follow-on activities; monitoring and evaluation; and
international travel for program implementation and/or evaluation
purposes.
The following guidelines may be helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International airfares (per The Fly America Act),
transit costs, ground transportation, and visas for participating
artists to travel to the project destinations.
B. Per Diem: Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC. Foreign per diem
rates may be accessed at: https://aoprals.state.gov/content.asp?content_id=184&menu_id=78.
C. Sub-awardees and Consultants. Sub-awardee organizations may be
used, in which case the written agreement between the prospective award
recipient and sub-awardee should be included in the proposal. Sub-
awards must be itemized in the budget under General Program Expenses.
Consultants may be used to provide specialized expertise. Daily
honoraria cannot exceed $200 per day, and applicants are strongly
encouraged to use organizational resources, and to cost share heavily
in this area.
D. Health Insurance. Each participating artist will be covered
under the terms of the ECA-sponsored Accident and Sickness Program for
Exchanges (ASPE) health insurance program. The cost for international
travel insurance for staff travel may be included in the proposal
budget.
E. Honoraria for participating artists. Daily honorarium is $200
per day for each artist.
[[Page 20660]]
F. Educational Material and Promotional Items. Artists may use
these funds to purchase project material and promotional items whether
in the U.S. or abroad. ECA funds for educational and promotional items
(e.g. CDS, DVDS, catalogues, brochures, etc.) should be tailored to
meet the needs of the project and be proportional to the overall
project cost. Material costs may be subject to change once actual
projects are scheduled; however, for proposal budget purposes, costs
should be estimated at $1,000 per project.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage costs are based on the size and
weight of art materials and supplies. Excess baggage estimates may be
subject to change once actual projects are scheduled; however for
proposal budget purposes, costs should be estimated at $500 per visual
arts project.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes of a proposed budget, line
items for immunizations should be estimated at $400 per artist, and
visas/visa photos should be estimated at $200 per artist.
I. Press Kits. As appropriate, based on the project and foreign
country, the award recipient should design and create press kits in
consultation with ECA. This line item may include funds for designing
and publishing print materials and/or CD's, DVD's.
J. Staff Travel. Allowable costs include domestic staff travel for
one staff member to meet with sub-awardees. International staff travel
will be allowable, especially if associated with monitoring and
evaluation, as long as costs for each project are completely covered.
Cost-sharing for staff travel is strongly encouraged.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective
administration of the program may include salaries for award recipient
organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs
per detailed instructions in the Solicitation Package. While there is
no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which
the administrative costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested from
ECA award funds will be more competitive on cost effectiveness. Please
refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: May 26, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-50.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important Note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and ten copies of the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/CU-10-50,
SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522-0504.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant
timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from transmission
or conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.Grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the website. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
grants.gov can take up to two
[[Page 20661]]
business days. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until
the application deadline to begin the submission process through
grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic
applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3f.3 Only one application may be submitted by an organization.
Submission of more than one application will automatically disqualify
that organization for all applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order 12372
Does Not Apply to This Program
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to Achieve Objectives: Proposals
should exhibit originality, substance and precision. The program plan
should state the project's relevance to the U.S. Department of State's
foreign policy goals. Program objectives should be stated clearly and
should reflect the organization's expertise in the visual arts and in
the area of community outreach. Objectives should be reasonable,
feasible, and flexible. Detailed agenda and plan should adhere to the
program overview and guidelines described above. Proposals should
include a detailed timeline/agenda for accomplishing all of the program
activities including application phases, participant selection, project
implementation and project monitoring.
2. Institutional Capacity/Record: Proposals should include the
institution's mission and date that 501(c) 3 status was approved.
Proposals should reflect institution's expertise in the subject areas,
knowledge of conditions overseas, and expertise in planning programs
that strengthen connections between the United States and other
countries. Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals.
Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau awards
(grants or cooperative agreements) as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
Institutions with previous successful experience in conducting exchange
programs with the U.S. Government will be deemed more competitive.
Proposals must include references with name and contact information for
other assistance awards the applicant has received in the event the
Bureau chooses to be in touch directly.
The Bureau strongly encourages submission of letters of support and
commitment from proposed partner organizations.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages. Proposals should demonstrate a clear understanding of how the
individual art projects can have a long lasting impact on the foreign
community.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
5. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan to conduct
activities after the Bureau-funded project has concluded in order to
ensure that Bureau-supported programs are not isolated events. Post-
award activities must be funded by contributions from sources outside
the Bureau. Costs for these activities should not appear in the
proposal budget, but should be outlined in the narrative.
6. Project Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals should include a
detailed plan to monitor and evaluate the program. Competitive
evaluation plans will describe how the project's success at meeting
program objectives in quantitative terms will be measured, and should
include draft data collection instruments such as surveys and
questionnaires, media coverage, and other significant local reaction to
specific projects. Proposals should include a plan to evaluate the
activities' success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. ECA is especially interested in the qualitative and
quantitative results of project activities both in terms of the impact
on audiences, as well as on participants. It will be the award
recipient's responsibility to inform the Bureau of exchange activity
results and changes to the program plan and/or project timeline.
7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost Sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. In the event programming involves Iran, West Bank and Gaza,
the
[[Page 20662]]
following additional requirements may apply: A critical component of
current U.S. government Iran policy is the support for indigenous
Iranian voices. The State Department has made the awarding of awards
for this purpose a key component of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
has requested the Department of State to follow certain procedures to
effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b)
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and
2339B; Executive Order 13224; and Homeland Security Presidential
Directive 6. These licensing conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran awardees and sub-awardees for
counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct this vetting the Department will
collect information from awardees and sub-awardees regarding the
identity and background of their key employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran
complies with requirements, please contact Catherine Staples-
Randolph at 202-632-6425 or StaplesCD@state.gov for additional
information.
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
Catherine Staples-Randolph at 202-632-6425 or StaplesCD@state.gov
for additional information.
Special Provision for Performance in a Designated Combat Area
(Currently Iraq and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense (currently Iraq and
Afghanistan), under assistance awards over $100,000 or performance over
14 days must register in the Department of Defense maintained
Synchronized Pre-deployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) system.
Recipients of federal assistance awards shall register in SPOT before
deployment, or if already in the designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the assistance award, and maintain
current data in SPOT. Information on how to register in SPOT will be
available from your Grants Officer or Grants Officer Representative
during the final negotiation and approval stages in the federal
assistance awards process. Recipients of federal assistance awards are
advised that adherence to this policy and procedure will be a
requirement of all final federal assistance awards issued by ECA.
Recipient performance may require the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such private security contractors (PSCs)
are required, awardees are required to ensure they adhere to Chief of
Mission (COM) policies and procedures regarding the operation,
oversight, and accountability of PSCs.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/awards.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov
VI.3 Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus ten copies of
the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov website--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial reports that include final
costs for each visual arts project and remaining award funds for
additional projects.
(5) During the period of implementation of each visual arts
project, bi-weekly reports to the ECA program office that include
photographs, any media coverage and information on substantive elements
of the project.
(6) No more than two weeks following conclusion of each visual arts
project, a report and evaluation of the substantive aspects of the
project (including budget) to the ECA program office.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Program Data Requirements
The award recipient will be required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an electronically accessible
database format that can be shared with the Bureau as requested. As a
minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the agreement.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general (non-substantive) questions about this announcement,
contact: Catherine Staples-Randolph at 202-632-6425 or
StaplesCD@state.gov. For specific (substantive) questions about the
``smART Power: Visual Arts'' program, contact: Alan Cross, Cultural
Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU), Room 3-K14, ECA/PE/C-CU-10-50,
[[Page 20663]]
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522-0503; tel 202-632-6407; fax 202-632-9355; e-mail
CrossA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C-CU-10-50 and the specific
program being requested.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-9076 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P