Special Conditions: Cirrus Design Corporation, Model SF50; Fire Extinguishing for Upper Aft Fuselage Mounted Engine, 20516-20518 [2010-9026]
Download as PDF
20516
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because the next reporting
period ends on May 20 and the
Committee needs to inform all handlers
of this change to the reporting time.
Therefore, this rule should be
implemented as soon as possible.
Further, handlers were made aware of
this change which was recommended at
a public meeting. Also, a 30-day
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 929
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Cranberries.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 929 is amended as
follows:
■
PART 929—CRANBERRIES GROWN IN
THE STATES OF MASSACHUSETTS,
RHODE ISLAND, CONNECTICUT, NEW
JERSEY, WISCONSIN, MICHIGAN,
MINNESOTA, OREGON,
WASHINGTON, AND LONG ISLAND IN
THE STATE OF NEW YORK
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 929 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend § 929.105 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 929.105
Reporting.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Certified reports shall be filed with
the committee, on a form provided by
the committee, by each handler not later
than January 20, May 20, and August 20
of each fiscal period and by September
20 of the succeeding fiscal period
showing:
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: April 7, 2010.
David R. Shipman
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–8273 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE305; Special Conditions No.
23–245–SC]
Special Conditions: Cirrus Design
Corporation, Model SF50; Fire
Extinguishing for Upper Aft Fuselage
Mounted Engine
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Cirrus Design
Corporation, model SF50 airplane. This
single turbofan engine airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with mounting the
engine in the aft fuselage. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is April 12, 2010.
We must receive your comments by
May 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE305,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address.
Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE305. You may inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie B. Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329–
4134; facsimile (816) 329–4090, email
leslie.b.taylor@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested persons to
submit such written data, views, or
arguments as they desire. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You may
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we
received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a preaddressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will
stamp the date on the postcard and mail
it back to you.
Background
On September 9, 2008, Cirrus Design
Corporation applied for a type
certificate for their new model SF50.
The model SF50 is a 7 seat (5 adults and
2 children), pressurized, retractable
gear, carbon composite, airplane with
one turbofan engine mounted partially
in the upper aft fuselage.
The single turbofan engine is
mounted on the upper aft fuselage, not
in the pilot’s line of site. Upper aft
fuselage mounted engine installations,
along with the need to protect such
installed engines from fires, were not
envisioned in the development of the
part 23 normal category regulations.
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Cirrus Design Corporation must show
that the model SF50 meets the
applicable provisions of part 23, as
amended by Amendment 23–1 through
Amendment 23–59 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations,
part 23, do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the
model SF50 because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the model SF50 must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under section 611 of Public
Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of
1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The model SF50 will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features: An aft fuselage mounted
engine is not in the pilot’s line of sight.
This type of configuration was not
envisioned in the development of part
23 normal category airplanes. Therefore,
a special condition for the fire
extinguishing system for the engine on
the model SF50 is required.
Regulations requiring and defining
engine compartment fire extinguishing
systems already exist for part 23
commuter category airplanes. These
regulations will provide an adequate
level of safety for the normal category
model SF50 with the aft mounted
engine except SC 23.1195 will require a
two shot system.
As the extinguishing agent is subject
to change during the service life of the
airplane, the certification basis must
include 14 CFR 23.1197, 23.1199,
23.1201 in their entirety.
Discussion
Part 23 has historically addressed fire
protection through prevention,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
identification, and containment.
Prevention has been accomplished by
minimizing the potential for ignition of
flammable fluids and vapors.
Identification has traditionally been
achieved by the location of the engines
within the pilot’s primary field of view
and/or with the incorporation of fire
detection systems. This philosophy has
provided for both the rapid detection of
a fire and confirmation when it has been
extinguished. Containment has been
provided through the isolation of
designated fire zones through flammable
fluid shutoff valves and firewalls. The
containment philosophy also ensures
that components of the engine control
system will function effectively to
permit a safe shutdown of the engine.
However, containment has only been
required to be demonstrated for 15
minutes. In the event of a fire in a
traditional part 23 airplane, the
corrective action is to land as soon as
possible. For a small, simple aircraft
originally envisioned by part 23, it is
possible to descend the aircraft to a
suitable landing site within 15 minutes.
Thus, if the isolation means do not
extinguish the fire, the occupants can
safely exit the aircraft prior to the
firewall being breached. These simple
and traditional aircraft normally have
the engine located away from critical
flight control systems and primary
structure. This has ensured that
throughout the fire event the pilot can
maintain control and continue safe
flight. It has also made predicting the
effects of a fire relatively easy. Other
design features of these simple and
traditional aircraft, such as low stall
speeds and short landing distances,
ensure that even in the event of an off
field landing the potential for a
catastrophic outcome has been
minimized.
Excluding commuter category, normal
category airplanes incorporating one or
more engines on the aft fuselage were
not envisioned in part 23. Engine(s)
located on the aft fuselage offer minimal
opportunity to visually detect a fire. The
ability to extinguish an engine fire
becomes extremely critical due to this
location. In a traditional pylon engine
there is a standoff distance from the
fuselage where there is no possible
impingement of fluid or flame on the
fuselage. Thus after 5 minutes if the
fluid lines succumb to the fire any
liberated fluid would not come into
contact with any other critical structure
or the fuselage. In essence the engine
could burn off of the pylon and not
adversely compromise the fuselage. The
Cirrus design configuration does not
benefit from this consideration and thus
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20517
there is a greater risk due to fire. Also,
if there was a fire due to a buildup of
fuel in the exhaust nozzle a low velocity
flame could impinge upon the fuselage
or empennage.
Airplanes of the classic configuration
with twin aft pylon mounted engines
have fire extinguishing ‘‘one-shot’’
systems. A two shot system is necessary
for fuselage embedded engines since the
metallic components in the fire zone
can be hot enough to re-ignite
flammable fumes after the first fire has
been extinguished. The consequences of
a fire in these locations can be more
varied, adverse, and difficult to predict
than the engine fire envisioned for a
typical part 23 airplane. The Cirrus aft
engine installation is more indicative of
an embedded engine rather than a pylon
mounted engine.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the model
SF50. Should Cirrus Design Corporation
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
20518
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
(2) Protective breathing equipment is
available for each flight member on
flight deck duty.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
SC 23.1199
Containers
14 CFR Part 23
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Cirrus Design
Corporation model SF50 airplanes.
The following applies:
(a) Each extinguishing agent container
must have a pressure relief valve to
prevent bursting of the container by
excessive internal pressures.
(b) The discharge end of each
discharge line from a pressure relief
connection must be located so that
discharge of the fire extinguishing agent
would not damage the airplane. The line
must also be located or protected to
prevent clogging caused by ice or other
foreign matter.
(c) A means must be provided for
each fire extinguishing agent container
to indicate that the container has
discharged or that the charging pressure
is below the established minimum
necessary for proper functioning.
(d) The temperature of each container
must be maintained under intended
operating conditions to prevent the
pressure in the container from —
(1) Falling below that necessary to
provide an adequate rate of discharge; or
(2) Rising high enough to cause
premature discharge.
(e) If a pyrotechnic capsule is used to
discharge the extinguishing agent, each
container must be installed so that
temperature conditions will not cause
hazardous deterioration of the
pyrotechnic capsule.
Fire Extinguishing for Upper Aft
Fuselage Mounted Engine
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SC 23.1195 Fire Extinguishing Systems
Fire extinguishing systems must be
installed and compliance shown with
the following:
(a) Except for combustor, turbine, and
tailpipe sections of turbine-engine
installations that contain lines or
components carrying flammable fluids
or gases for which a fire originating in
these sections is shown to be
controllable, a fire extinguisher system
must serve each engine compartment.
(b) The fire extinguishing system, the
quantity of the extinguishing agent, the
rate of discharge, and the discharge
distribution must be adequate to
extinguish fires. An individual ‘‘two
shot’’ system must be used.
(c) The fire extinguishing system for
a nacelle must be able to simultaneously
protect each compartment of the nacelle
for which protection is provided.
SC 23.1197 Fire Extinguishing Agents
The following applies:
(a) Fire extinguishing agents must—
(1) Be capable of extinguishing flames
emanating from any burning of fluids or
other combustible materials in the area
protected by the fire extinguishing
system; and
(2) Have thermal stability over the
temperature range likely to be
experienced in the compartment in
which they are stored.
(b) If any toxic extinguishing agent is
used, provisions must be made to
prevent harmful concentrations of fluid
or fluid vapors (from leakage during
normal operation of the airplane or as a
result of discharging the fire
extinguisher on the ground or in flight)
from entering any personnel
compartment, even though a defect may
exist in the extinguishing system. This
must be shown by test except for builtin carbon dioxide fuselage compartment
fire extinguishing systems for which—
(1) Five pounds or less of carbon
dioxide will be discharged, under
established fire control procedures, into
any fuselage compartment; or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
SC 23.1201
Materials
Extinguishing Agent
Fire Extinguishing System
The following apply:
(a) No material in any fire
extinguishing system may react
chemically with any extinguishing agent
so as to create a hazard.
(b) Each system component in an
engine compartment must be fireproof.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on April
12, 2010.
Steve Thompson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9026 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. CE306; Special Conditions No.
23–246–SC]
Special Conditions: Cirrus Design
Corporation Model SF50 Airplane; Full
Authority Digital Engine Control
(FADEC) System
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Cirrus Design Corporation
model SF50 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with the use of an
electronic engine control system instead
of a traditional mechanical control
system. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is April 12, 2010.
We must receive your comments by
May 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE306,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address.
Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE306. You may inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter L. Rouse, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, Small Airplane Directorate,
ACE–111, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 816–329–
4135, fax 816–329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 20, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20516-20518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9026]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE305; Special Conditions No. 23-245-SC]
Special Conditions: Cirrus Design Corporation, Model SF50; Fire
Extinguishing for Upper Aft Fuselage Mounted Engine
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Cirrus Design
Corporation, model SF50 airplane. This single turbofan engine airplane
will have a novel or unusual design feature(s) associated with mounting
the engine in the aft fuselage. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is April 12,
2010.
We must receive your comments by May 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE305,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address. Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE305. You may inspect comments in the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie B. Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816)
329-4134; facsimile (816) 329-4090, email leslie.b.taylor@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested persons to submit such written data, views, or
arguments as they desire. The most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You may inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
On September 9, 2008, Cirrus Design Corporation applied for a type
certificate for their new model SF50. The model SF50 is a 7 seat (5
adults and 2 children), pressurized, retractable gear, carbon
composite, airplane with one turbofan engine mounted partially in the
upper aft fuselage.
The single turbofan engine is mounted on the upper aft fuselage,
not in the pilot's line of site. Upper aft fuselage mounted engine
installations, along with the need to protect such installed engines
from fires, were not envisioned in the development of the part 23
normal category regulations.
[[Page 20517]]
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Cirrus Design Corporation
must show that the model SF50 meets the applicable provisions of part
23, as amended by Amendment 23-1 through Amendment 23-59 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations, part 23, do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the model SF50 because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of
Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the model SF50 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy under section 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise
Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The model SF50 will incorporate the following novel or unusual
design features: An aft fuselage mounted engine is not in the pilot's
line of sight. This type of configuration was not envisioned in the
development of part 23 normal category airplanes. Therefore, a special
condition for the fire extinguishing system for the engine on the model
SF50 is required.
Regulations requiring and defining engine compartment fire
extinguishing systems already exist for part 23 commuter category
airplanes. These regulations will provide an adequate level of safety
for the normal category model SF50 with the aft mounted engine except
SC 23.1195 will require a two shot system.
As the extinguishing agent is subject to change during the service
life of the airplane, the certification basis must include 14 CFR
23.1197, 23.1199, 23.1201 in their entirety.
Discussion
Part 23 has historically addressed fire protection through
prevention, identification, and containment. Prevention has been
accomplished by minimizing the potential for ignition of flammable
fluids and vapors. Identification has traditionally been achieved by
the location of the engines within the pilot's primary field of view
and/or with the incorporation of fire detection systems. This
philosophy has provided for both the rapid detection of a fire and
confirmation when it has been extinguished. Containment has been
provided through the isolation of designated fire zones through
flammable fluid shutoff valves and firewalls. The containment
philosophy also ensures that components of the engine control system
will function effectively to permit a safe shutdown of the engine.
However, containment has only been required to be demonstrated for 15
minutes. In the event of a fire in a traditional part 23 airplane, the
corrective action is to land as soon as possible. For a small, simple
aircraft originally envisioned by part 23, it is possible to descend
the aircraft to a suitable landing site within 15 minutes. Thus, if the
isolation means do not extinguish the fire, the occupants can safely
exit the aircraft prior to the firewall being breached. These simple
and traditional aircraft normally have the engine located away from
critical flight control systems and primary structure. This has ensured
that throughout the fire event the pilot can maintain control and
continue safe flight. It has also made predicting the effects of a fire
relatively easy. Other design features of these simple and traditional
aircraft, such as low stall speeds and short landing distances, ensure
that even in the event of an off field landing the potential for a
catastrophic outcome has been minimized.
Excluding commuter category, normal category airplanes
incorporating one or more engines on the aft fuselage were not
envisioned in part 23. Engine(s) located on the aft fuselage offer
minimal opportunity to visually detect a fire. The ability to
extinguish an engine fire becomes extremely critical due to this
location. In a traditional pylon engine there is a standoff distance
from the fuselage where there is no possible impingement of fluid or
flame on the fuselage. Thus after 5 minutes if the fluid lines succumb
to the fire any liberated fluid would not come into contact with any
other critical structure or the fuselage. In essence the engine could
burn off of the pylon and not adversely compromise the fuselage. The
Cirrus design configuration does not benefit from this consideration
and thus there is a greater risk due to fire. Also, if there was a fire
due to a buildup of fuel in the exhaust nozzle a low velocity flame
could impinge upon the fuselage or empennage.
Airplanes of the classic configuration with twin aft pylon mounted
engines have fire extinguishing ``one-shot'' systems. A two shot system
is necessary for fuselage embedded engines since the metallic
components in the fire zone can be hot enough to re-ignite flammable
fumes after the first fire has been extinguished. The consequences of a
fire in these locations can be more varied, adverse, and difficult to
predict than the engine fire envisioned for a typical part 23 airplane.
The Cirrus aft engine installation is more indicative of an embedded
engine rather than a pylon mounted engine.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
model SF50. Should Cirrus Design Corporation apply at a later date for
a change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability
and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of
these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting
these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments
to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
[[Page 20518]]
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.17; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Cirrus Design Corporation model SF50
airplanes.
Fire Extinguishing for Upper Aft Fuselage Mounted Engine
SC 23.1195 Fire Extinguishing Systems
Fire extinguishing systems must be installed and compliance shown
with the following:
(a) Except for combustor, turbine, and tailpipe sections of
turbine-engine installations that contain lines or components carrying
flammable fluids or gases for which a fire originating in these
sections is shown to be controllable, a fire extinguisher system must
serve each engine compartment.
(b) The fire extinguishing system, the quantity of the
extinguishing agent, the rate of discharge, and the discharge
distribution must be adequate to extinguish fires. An individual ``two
shot'' system must be used.
(c) The fire extinguishing system for a nacelle must be able to
simultaneously protect each compartment of the nacelle for which
protection is provided.
SC 23.1197 Fire Extinguishing Agents
The following applies:
(a) Fire extinguishing agents must--
(1) Be capable of extinguishing flames emanating from any burning
of fluids or other combustible materials in the area protected by the
fire extinguishing system; and
(2) Have thermal stability over the temperature range likely to be
experienced in the compartment in which they are stored.
(b) If any toxic extinguishing agent is used, provisions must be
made to prevent harmful concentrations of fluid or fluid vapors (from
leakage during normal operation of the airplane or as a result of
discharging the fire extinguisher on the ground or in flight) from
entering any personnel compartment, even though a defect may exist in
the extinguishing system. This must be shown by test except for built-
in carbon dioxide fuselage compartment fire extinguishing systems for
which--
(1) Five pounds or less of carbon dioxide will be discharged, under
established fire control procedures, into any fuselage compartment; or
(2) Protective breathing equipment is available for each flight
member on flight deck duty.
SC 23.1199 Extinguishing Agent Containers
The following applies:
(a) Each extinguishing agent container must have a pressure relief
valve to prevent bursting of the container by excessive internal
pressures.
(b) The discharge end of each discharge line from a pressure relief
connection must be located so that discharge of the fire extinguishing
agent would not damage the airplane. The line must also be located or
protected to prevent clogging caused by ice or other foreign matter.
(c) A means must be provided for each fire extinguishing agent
container to indicate that the container has discharged or that the
charging pressure is below the established minimum necessary for proper
functioning.
(d) The temperature of each container must be maintained under
intended operating conditions to prevent the pressure in the container
from --
(1) Falling below that necessary to provide an adequate rate of
discharge; or
(2) Rising high enough to cause premature discharge.
(e) If a pyrotechnic capsule is used to discharge the extinguishing
agent, each container must be installed so that temperature conditions
will not cause hazardous deterioration of the pyrotechnic capsule.
SC 23.1201 Fire Extinguishing System Materials
The following apply:
(a) No material in any fire extinguishing system may react
chemically with any extinguishing agent so as to create a hazard.
(b) Each system component in an engine compartment must be
fireproof.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on April 12, 2010.
Steve Thompson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-9026 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P