Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review, 20568-20570 [2010-9014]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
20568
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
Administration, respecting Stainless
Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, NAFTA Secretariat File
Number USA–MEX–2007–1904–01. The
binational panel affirmed in part and
remanded in part the International
Trade Administration’s determination,
with one dissenting opinion. Copies of
the panel decision are available from the
U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marsha Ann Y. Iyomasa, Acting United
States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat,
Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202)
482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter has been conducted in
accordance with these Rules.
Panel Decision: The panel affirmed in
part and remanded in part the
International Trade Administration’s
determination respecting Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico
with one dissenting opinion. The panel
remanded on the following issues:
1. On the issue of the permissibility
of zeroing, the Panel remands this
matter back to Commerce to re-calculate
Mexinox’s dumping margins without
zeroing;
2. On the issue of whether
Commerce’s adjustments to the U.S.
indirect selling expense ratio are not in
accordance with law, the Panel remands
this matter back to Commerce to recalculate the indirect selling expense
ratio in a manner not inconsistent with
the panel’s opinion; and
3. Commerce is further directed to
issue its Final Re-Determination on
Remand within forty-five days from the
date of this Panel Decision.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Department’s decision in the final
results of the 2004/2005 antidumping
review was, in all other respects upheld.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Marsha Ann Y. Iyomasa,
Acting U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2010–9015 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Sea Grant Advisory Board
AGENCY: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of solicitation for
nominations for potential National Sea
Grant Advisory Board members and
notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice responds to
Section 209 of the Sea Grant Program
Improvement Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94–
461, 33 U.S.C. 1128), which requires the
Secretary of Commerce to solicit
nominations at least once a year for
membership on the National Sea Grant
Advisory Board, an advisory committee
that provides advice on the
implementation of the National Sea
Grant College Program.
DATES: Solicitation of nominations is
open ended: resumes may be sent to the
address specified at any time.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent
to Dr. James D. Murray; Designated
Federal Official, National Sea Grant
Advisory Board; Deputy Director,
National Sea Grant College Program;
1315 East-West Highway, Room 11841;
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Established by Section 209 of the Act
and as amended the National Sea Grant
College Program Amendments Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110–394), the duties of the
Board are as follows:
(1) In general—The Board shall advise
the Secretary and the Director
concerning—
(A) Strategies for utilizing the sea
grant college program to address the
Nation’s highest priorities regarding the
understanding, assessment,
development, management, utilization,
and conservation of ocean, coastal, and
Great Lakes resources;
(B) The designation of sea grant
colleges and sea grant institutes; and
(C) Such other matters as the
Secretary refers to the Board for review
and advice.
(2) Biennial Report—The Board shall
report to the Congress every two years
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on the state of the national sea grant
college program. The Board shall
indicate in each such report the progress
made toward meeting the priorities
identified in the strategic plan in effect
under section 204(c). The Secretary
shall make available to the Board such
information, personnel, and
administrative services and assistance
as it may reasonably require to carry out
its duties under this title.
The Board shall consist of 15 voting
members who shall be appointed by the
Secretary. The Director and a director of
a sea grant program who is elected by
the various directors of sea grant
programs shall serve as nonvoting
members of the Board. Not less than 8
of the voting members of the Board shall
be individuals who, by reason of
knowledge, experience, or training, are
especially qualified in one or more of
the disciplines and fields included in
marine science. The other voting
members shall be individuals who, by
reason of knowledge, experience, or
training, are especially qualified in, or
representative of, education, marine
affairs and resource management,
coastal management, extension services,
State government, industry, economics,
planning, or any other activity which is
appropriate to, and important for, any
effort to enhance the understanding,
assessment, development, management,
utilization, or conservation of ocean,
coastal, and Great Lakes resources. No
individual is eligible to be a voting
member of the Board if the individual
is (A) the director of a sea grant college
or sea grant institute; (B) an applicant
for, or beneficiary (as determined by the
Secretary) of, any grant or contract
under section 205 [33 USCS § 1124]; or
(C) a full-time officer or employee of the
United States.
The Director of the National Sea Grant
College Program and one Director of a
Sea Grant Program also serve as nonvoting members. Board members are
appointed for a 4-year term.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrator
Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–9100 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities Under OMB Review
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this notice announces that
the Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below has been forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
costs and burden; it includes the actual
data collection instruments [if any].
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 20, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY
CONTACT: Andrea Musalem at CFTC,
(202) 418–5167; FAX: (202) 418–5547;
e-mail: amusalem@cftc.gov and refer to
OMB Control No. 3038–0023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Proposed Questionnaire to
Regulation 30.10 Relief Recipients
(OMB Control No. 3038–0023). This is
a request for approval of a new
information collection.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Abstract
I. Background
CFTC Regulation 30.10 allows
persons located and doing business
outside the U.S., who are subject to a
comparable regulatory framework in the
country in which they are located, to
seek an exemption from the application
of certain of the Part 30 regulations.
Regulation 30.10 expressly states that,
upon petition, the Commission may
exempt any person from any
requirement of the Part 30 regulations.
If the Commission grants an exemption,
persons located and doing business
outside the U.S. may solicit or accept
orders directly from U.S. customers for
foreign futures or options transactions
without registering under the Act as
FCMs.
A petition for exemption pursuant to
Regulation 30.10 is typically filed on
behalf of persons located and doing
business outside the U.S. that seek
access to U.S. customers by (1) a
governmental agency responsible for
implementing and enforcing the foreign
regulatory program, or (2) a selfregulatory organization (SRO) of which
such persons are members. A petitioner
who seeks an exemption pursuant to
Regulation 30.10, based on substituted
compliance with a non-U.S. regulatory
framework that is comparable to the Act
and rules thereunder, must set forth
with particularity the comparable
regulations applicable in the
jurisdiction in which that person is
located. In essence, a petitioner under
Regulation 30.10 must present, with
particularity, the factual basis for a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
finding of comparability and the reasons
why the policies and purposes of the
Commission’s regulatory program are
met, notwithstanding any differences of
degree or kind in the petitioner’s
regulatory program.
Appendix A to Part 30 (Appendix A)
articulates standards to be used by staff
in assessing whether a foreign
regulatory system is comparable.1 These
standards involve inquiry into the
following areas: (1) Registration,
authorization or other form of licensing,
fitness review or qualification of
persons through which customer orders
are solicited and accepted; (2) minimum
financial requirements for those persons
that accept customer funds; (3)
protection of customer funds from
misapplication; (4) recordkeeping and
reporting requirements; (5) minimum
sales practice standards, including
disclosure of the risks of futures and
options transactions and, in particular,
the risk of transactions undertaken
outside the jurisdiction of domestic law;
(6) compliance; and (7) informationsharing.
II. The Proposed Questionnaire
Currently, there are 13 foreign
entities 2 (two regulators and 11 futures
exchanges) that have a Regulation 30.10
exemption some of which date back to
the late eighties, early nineties.
Consequently, the Commission’s
Division of Clearing and Intermediary
Oversight (DCIO) would like to embark
upon a program whereby each year,
DCIO sends out a questionnaire to
exemption recipients inquiring as to
material and other relevant changes that
impacted our could impact the
fundamentals for which exemptive
relief was granted in the first place.
The proposed 2010 Questionnaire
will ask the following questions: The
following questions relate to material
changes that have occurred since the
original filing of the 30.10 petition.
Please answer the following questions
in detail.
1. Have there been any material
changes with regards to the identity or
organization of the original Petitioner
(i.e. change in control, change in name,
change in structure, etc.)?
2. Has there been a change in the role
of the government, the regulator, or the
self-regulatory organization(s) which
has or could potentially impact their
supervision of and their enforcement
1 ‘‘Interpretative Statement With Respect to the
Commission’s Exemptive Authority Under § 30.10
of its Rules,’’ l7 CFR part 30, Appendix A.
2 The 13 foreign entities are represented by the
following jurisdictions: The United Kingdom,
Australia, Brazil, Germany, Canada, France, Spain,
New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, and Japan.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20569
powers over the exchange and its
members?
3. Has there been any material change
in the legal framework which impacted
or could impact any of the following:
a. Registration, authorization or other
form of licensing, fitness review or
qualification of persons through which
customer orders are solicited and
accepted;
b. Minimum financial requirements
for those persons that accept customer
funds;
c. Protection of customer funds from
misapplication;
d. Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements;
e. Minimum sales practice standards,
including disclosure of risks of futures
and options transactions and, in
particular, the risk of transactions
undertaken outside the jurisdiction of
domestic law; and
f. Compliance (i.e. any change in
oversight structure which impacted or
could impact the governmental
authority or the self-regulatory
organization’s ability to audit Part 30
firms for compliance with, or take
action against persons that violate the
requirements of the Part 30 program).
4. What changes, if any, have
occurred in insolvency laws as they
affect futures customers? If there have
been changes to insolvency laws, have
the changes occurred within the past
two to three years? To what extent do
you view any recently proposed changes
to insolvency laws as resulting from the
2008–09 financial crisis?
5. Security futures products have both
an equity component and a futures
component. Consequently, in what
accounts are security futures products
held (i.e. the equity account, the futures
account, or a combined account)? Are
security futures products subject to
separate disclosure and margin
requirements than those required for
plain vanilla futures products?
6. Please provide an updated list of all
firms with relief under the Regulation
30.10 exemption.
7. Since the granting of the original
exemption, please affirm whether 30.10
firms have been subject to arbitration
and/or disciplinary proceedings arising
from transactions with U.S. customers.
To the best extent possible, please
provide the number of times and a brief
description of such proceedings.
8. Please provide the name and
contact information for individuals to
whom follow up questions might be
directed.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20570
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
control number. The OMB control
numbers for the CFTC’s regulations
were published on December 30, 1981.
See 46 FR 63035 (Dec. 30, 1981). The
Federal Register notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on
this collection of information was
published on February 10, 2010 (75 FR
6637).
Burden statement: The respondent
burden for this collection is estimated to
average one hour per response. These
estimates include the time needed to
review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining information
and disclosing and providing
information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; train
personnel to be able to respond to a
collection of information; and transmit
or otherwise disclose the information.
Respondents/Affected Entities: 13.
Estimated number of responses: 13.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 169 hours.
Frequency of collection: Annually.
Send comments regarding the burden
estimated or any other aspect of the
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
the addresses listed below. Please refer
to OMB Control No. 3038–0023 in any
correspondence.
Andrea Musalem, Division of Clearing
and Intermediary Oversight, U.S.
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581; and
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for
CFTC, 725 17th Street, Washington,
DC 20503.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–9014 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’), has submitted a public
information collection request (ICR)
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
AGENCY: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
entitled the Community Stakeholder
Assessment of Senior Corps RSVP
Grantees to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for
National and Community Service,
Katharine Delo Gregg at (202) 606–6965.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call (202) 606–3472
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in this Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
smar@omb.eop.gov.
A 60-day public comment Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
January 12, 2010. This comment period
ended March 15, 2010. A total of 12
commenters submitted 33 comments.
Comment 1. The Corporation is urged
to take a step back and consider other
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ways in which ‘‘true stakeholder
support’’ can be obtained.
Response—Corporation disagrees and
believes that the proposed collection is
at least one valid method assessing
stakeholder support.
Comment 2. The federal registry
explains the purpose of the survey is to
help provide TTA to existing projects.
The purpose statement on the survey
does not talk about TTA.
Response—Instrument instructions
will be edited per comment.
Comment 3. Two commenters
suggested that the language needs to be
simplified.
Response—Instrument instructions
and questions edited per comment.
Comment 4. The tool asks
assessments that I believe may be well
beyond the reach of our stakeholders to
properly assess.
Response—The instructions for the
instrument have been edited to clarify
why the intended recipients should be
able to adequately respond.
Comment 5. The burden of
administrative demand far exceeds any
perceived benefit from my perspective.
Response The instructions for the
instrument have been edited to clarify
that the benefit of the survey depends
on its use by the grantee.
Comment 6. Speaking more generally,
this assessment should reflect how
successfully respondents feel their
respective RSVP’s are doing to fulfill
their missions and provide volunteers
and services that have a meaningful and
significant impact on the needs of the
communities they operate in.
Response—Instrument instructions
and questions edited per comment.
Comment 7. Questions should better
address the processes and guidelines
applied to RSVP projects.
Response—Instrument instructions
and questions edited per comment.
Comment 8. Three commenters
suggested that there should be fewer
questions about how projects are
perceived by the community and a few
more about the operations of the project.
Response—The instructions for the
instrument have been edited to clarify
that the purpose of the instrument is to
measure community impact of RSVP
grantees.
Comment 9. Three commenters
suggested that there are some
similarities of the current questions.
Response—Instrument instructions
and questions edited per comment.
Comment 10. I would also like to have
the issue of a project that does not have
a formal advisory council addressed.
Response—Instrument instructions
have been edited per comment.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20568-20570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9014]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
[[Page 20569]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request
(ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature
of the information collection and its expected costs and burden; it
includes the actual data collection instruments [if any].
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 20, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY CONTACT: Andrea Musalem at CFTC,
(202) 418-5167; FAX: (202) 418-5547; e-mail: amusalem@cftc.gov and
refer to OMB Control No. 3038-0023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Proposed Questionnaire to Regulation 30.10 Relief Recipients
(OMB Control No. 3038-0023). This is a request for approval of a new
information collection.
Abstract
I. Background
CFTC Regulation 30.10 allows persons located and doing business
outside the U.S., who are subject to a comparable regulatory framework
in the country in which they are located, to seek an exemption from the
application of certain of the Part 30 regulations. Regulation 30.10
expressly states that, upon petition, the Commission may exempt any
person from any requirement of the Part 30 regulations. If the
Commission grants an exemption, persons located and doing business
outside the U.S. may solicit or accept orders directly from U.S.
customers for foreign futures or options transactions without
registering under the Act as FCMs.
A petition for exemption pursuant to Regulation 30.10 is typically
filed on behalf of persons located and doing business outside the U.S.
that seek access to U.S. customers by (1) a governmental agency
responsible for implementing and enforcing the foreign regulatory
program, or (2) a self-regulatory organization (SRO) of which such
persons are members. A petitioner who seeks an exemption pursuant to
Regulation 30.10, based on substituted compliance with a non-U.S.
regulatory framework that is comparable to the Act and rules
thereunder, must set forth with particularity the comparable
regulations applicable in the jurisdiction in which that person is
located. In essence, a petitioner under Regulation 30.10 must present,
with particularity, the factual basis for a finding of comparability
and the reasons why the policies and purposes of the Commission's
regulatory program are met, notwithstanding any differences of degree
or kind in the petitioner's regulatory program.
Appendix A to Part 30 (Appendix A) articulates standards to be used
by staff in assessing whether a foreign regulatory system is
comparable.\1\ These standards involve inquiry into the following
areas: (1) Registration, authorization or other form of licensing,
fitness review or qualification of persons through which customer
orders are solicited and accepted; (2) minimum financial requirements
for those persons that accept customer funds; (3) protection of
customer funds from misapplication; (4) recordkeeping and reporting
requirements; (5) minimum sales practice standards, including
disclosure of the risks of futures and options transactions and, in
particular, the risk of transactions undertaken outside the
jurisdiction of domestic law; (6) compliance; and (7) information-
sharing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Interpretative Statement With Respect to the Commission's
Exemptive Authority Under Sec. 30.10 of its Rules,'' l7 CFR part
30, Appendix A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. The Proposed Questionnaire
Currently, there are 13 foreign entities \2\ (two regulators and 11
futures exchanges) that have a Regulation 30.10 exemption some of which
date back to the late eighties, early nineties. Consequently, the
Commission's Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight (DCIO)
would like to embark upon a program whereby each year, DCIO sends out a
questionnaire to exemption recipients inquiring as to material and
other relevant changes that impacted our could impact the fundamentals
for which exemptive relief was granted in the first place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The 13 foreign entities are represented by the following
jurisdictions: The United Kingdom, Australia, Brazil, Germany,
Canada, France, Spain, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, and Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed 2010 Questionnaire will ask the following questions:
The following questions relate to material changes that have occurred
since the original filing of the 30.10 petition. Please answer the
following questions in detail.
1. Have there been any material changes with regards to the
identity or organization of the original Petitioner (i.e. change in
control, change in name, change in structure, etc.)?
2. Has there been a change in the role of the government, the
regulator, or the self-regulatory organization(s) which has or could
potentially impact their supervision of and their enforcement powers
over the exchange and its members?
3. Has there been any material change in the legal framework which
impacted or could impact any of the following:
a. Registration, authorization or other form of licensing, fitness
review or qualification of persons through which customer orders are
solicited and accepted;
b. Minimum financial requirements for those persons that accept
customer funds;
c. Protection of customer funds from misapplication;
d. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements;
e. Minimum sales practice standards, including disclosure of risks
of futures and options transactions and, in particular, the risk of
transactions undertaken outside the jurisdiction of domestic law; and
f. Compliance (i.e. any change in oversight structure which
impacted or could impact the governmental authority or the self-
regulatory organization's ability to audit Part 30 firms for compliance
with, or take action against persons that violate the requirements of
the Part 30 program).
4. What changes, if any, have occurred in insolvency laws as they
affect futures customers? If there have been changes to insolvency
laws, have the changes occurred within the past two to three years? To
what extent do you view any recently proposed changes to insolvency
laws as resulting from the 2008-09 financial crisis?
5. Security futures products have both an equity component and a
futures component. Consequently, in what accounts are security futures
products held (i.e. the equity account, the futures account, or a
combined account)? Are security futures products subject to separate
disclosure and margin requirements than those required for plain
vanilla futures products?
6. Please provide an updated list of all firms with relief under
the Regulation 30.10 exemption.
7. Since the granting of the original exemption, please affirm
whether 30.10 firms have been subject to arbitration and/or
disciplinary proceedings arising from transactions with U.S. customers.
To the best extent possible, please provide the number of times and a
brief description of such proceedings.
8. Please provide the name and contact information for individuals
to whom follow up questions might be directed.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB
[[Page 20570]]
control number. The OMB control numbers for the CFTC's regulations were
published on December 30, 1981. See 46 FR 63035 (Dec. 30, 1981). The
Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on this collection of information was published on February
10, 2010 (75 FR 6637).
Burden statement: The respondent burden for this collection is
estimated to average one hour per response. These estimates include the
time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and
utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining
information and disclosing and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
Respondents/Affected Entities: 13.
Estimated number of responses: 13.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 169 hours.
Frequency of collection: Annually.
Send comments regarding the burden estimated or any other aspect of
the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to the addresses listed below. Please refer to OMB Control No.
3038-0023 in any correspondence.
Andrea Musalem, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, U.S.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581; and
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for CFTC, 725 17th Street, Washington,
DC 20503.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-9014 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P