Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices: Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information, 20615-20616 [2010-9010]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices Dated: April 8, 2010. Yvette Roubideaux, Director, Indian Health Service. [FR Doc. 2010–8831 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165–16–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0195] Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices: Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice; request for comments and for scientific data and information. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting comments and scientific data and information that would assist the agency in its plans to conduct a risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices. The purpose of the risk profile is to ascertain the current state of knowledge about spices contaminated with microbiological pathogens and/or filth, and the effectiveness of current and potential new interventions to reduce or prevent illnesses from contaminated spices. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES DATES: Submit electronic or written comments and scientific data and information by June 21, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments and scientific data and information to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments and scientific data and information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherri B. Dennis, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301–436–1914. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background A risk profile is a science-based document that describes the current state of knowledge about a specific food safety problem or issue and provides an evaluation of the data and information to support current interventions or new approaches to reduce or prevent illnesses (Ref. 1). FDA has adapted this tool as a new approach to assist the agency in its regulatory decisionmaking. Unlike a quantitative risk assessment, VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:55 Apr 19, 2010 Jkt 220001 which provides information about the number of people affected by a hazard in food and how this number might be changed if various control options were implemented, a risk profile provides qualitative answers to questions about the hazard and options for controlling it, based on available data. The information in a risk profile may affect a range of decisions, such as whether or not to commission a quantitative risk assessment or a request for research, or whether or not to implement an immediate and/or provisional regulatory decision. In some cases, it may reveal that no further action is needed. The risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices will provide information for FDA to use in the development of plans to reduce or prevent illness from spices contaminated by microbial pathogens and/or filth. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of current control measures to reduce or prevent illness from spices have been renewed by recent outbreaks of Salmonella associated with spices, including the imported ground white and black pepper products linked to an April 2009 outbreak of Salmonella Rissen illness, and the black and red pepper products recalled in March 2010 in response to an outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo illness (Refs. 2 and 3). For the purpose of this risk profile, the term ‘‘spice’’ means any aromatic vegetable substances in the whole, broken, or ground form, except for those substances which have been traditionally regarded as foods, whose significant function in food is seasoning rather than nutritional, and from which no portion of any volatile oil or other flavoring principle has been removed. The specific hazards in spices to be considered in this risk profile include those microbiological pathogens and filth in spices that are identified in the published literature, outbreaks, recalls, and submissions to the Reportable Food Registry (RFR).1 For purposes of this risk profile, FDA considers ‘‘filth’’ to mean ‘‘extraneous materials’’ as defined in FDA’s Defect Levels Handbook (Ref. 4). The Defect Levels Handbook defines ‘‘extraneous materials’’ as ‘‘any foreign matter in a product associated with objectionable conditions or practices in production, storage, or distribution * * * [including] objectionable matter contributed by insects, rodents, and birds; decomposed material; and 1 The RFR is an electronic portal where responsible parties are required to file a report when there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, an article of food will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals (Ref. 5). PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20615 miscellaneous matter such as sand, soil, glass, rust, or other foreign substances.’’ The overall objectives of the risk profile are to: • Describe the nature and extent of the public health risk, by identifying the most commonly occurring microbial and filth hazards in spices; • Describe and evaluate current mitigation and control options; • Identify potential additional mitigation or control options; • Identify research needs and data gaps. The specific questions to be addressed by the risk profile include: • What is known about the frequency and levels of pathogen and/or filth contamination of spices throughout the food supply chain (e.g., on the farm, at primary processing/manufacturing, intermediary processing (where spices are used as ingredients in multicomponent products), distribution (including importation), retail sale/use, and the consumer’s home)? • What is known about differences in production and contamination of imported and domestic spices? • What is known about the effectiveness, cost, and practicality of currently available and potential future interventions to prevent human illnesses associated with pathogen and/ or filth contamination of spices (e.g., practices and/or technologies to reduce or prevent contamination, surveillance, inspection, import strategies, or guidance)? • What are the highest priority research needs related to prevention or reduction of pathogens and/or filth in spices? II. Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information FDA is requesting comments on the risk profile approach outlined previously in this document and the submission of scientific data and information relevant to the risk profile. The agency is particularly interested in the following types of information: 1. Data, including unpublished data, on the incidence of contamination in spices according to: a. Date tested, b. Country exporting the spice and/or country of origin if different, c. Type of spice, d. Pathogen(s) and/or filth type (e.g., insect, rodent, extraneous), e. Quantitative (enumeration) or qualitative (presence/absence) results, and f. Other product sample information (e.g., pre- or post-treatment, treatment type, stage of production/ processing). E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1 20616 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices 2. Factors that influence the survival, growth, and levels of pathogens in spices including: a. On-farm practices, b. Manufacturing, processing, or marketing practices, c. Shipping, storage, and distribution practices, d. Storage conditions encountered throughout the farm-to-table continuum, and e. Pathways for transfer of pathogens to spices, including data on frequencies or amounts of transfer (e.g., cross-contamination potential). 3. Consumption patterns (including serving size and frequency) in the United States. 4. Intended use (e.g., ready-to-eat, ingredient in a prepared food). 5. Manufacturing practices, including the use of spices as ingredients in prepared foods. 6. Data, including unpublished data, on the identity and effectiveness of control measures or interventions to reduce levels and frequency of pathogens and/or filth in spices during growing, harvesting, processing, manufacturing, packaging, storage, and transportation prior to retail sale including: a. Description of treatment or other control measure, b. Country exporting spice using this treatment/control measure, c. Name of the specific spice and its form (e.g., whole, cracked, ground), d. Effect of the treatment/control measure on pathogen and/or filth levels, and e. Types of validation protocols used to verify the effectiveness of treatment/control measures. 7. Data relating to supplier specifications including required treatments, performance standards, microbial testing, and audit programs. 8. Any other data related to the occurrence and control of pathogens and/or filth in spices that are applicable to the risk profile. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES III. Comments 14:55 Apr 19, 2010 IV. References We have placed the following references on display in the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). You may see them between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. FDA has verified the Web site addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal Register. 1. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 19th Procedural Manual, https:// www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ procedural_manual.jsp, accessed April 13, 2010. 2. Food and Drug Administration, ‘‘FDA Alerts the Public to Uncle Chen and Lian How Brand Dry Spice Product Recall,’’ April 2, 2009, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/ Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2009/ ucm149555.htm, accessed April 13, 2010. 3. Food and Drug Administration, ‘‘FDA Update on the Investigation into the Salmonella Montevideo Outbreak,’’ March 17, 2010, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/ Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ ucm204917.htm, accessed April 13, 2010. 4. Food and Drug Administration, Defect Levels Handbook, https://www.fda.gov/Food/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ GuidanceDocuments/Sanitation/ ucm056174.htm, accessed April 13, 2010. 5. Food and Drug Administration, ‘‘Reportable Food Registry for Industry,’’ https://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/ FoodSafetyPrograms/RFR/default.htm, accessed April 13, 2010. Dated: April 14, 2010. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2010–9010 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG–2010–0266] Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and scientific data and information regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments and scientific data and information to https:// www.regulations.gov or two copies of any mailed comments and scientific data and information, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Submissions are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in VerDate Nov<24>2008 the heading of this document. Received comments and scientific data and information may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Jkt 220001 Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Numbers: 1625–0007, 1625–0074, 1625–0084, 1625–0093, and 1625–0102 Coast Guard, DHS. Sixty-day notice requesting comments. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit Information Collection Requests (ICRs) PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and Analyses to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requesting an extension of its approval for the following collections of information: (1) 1625–0007, Characteristics of Liquid Chemicals Proposed for Bulk Water Movement; (2) 1625–0074, Direct User Fees for Inspection or Examination of U.S. and Foreign Commercial Vessels; (3) 1625– 0084, Audit Reports under the International Safety Management Code; (4) 1625–0093, Facilities Transferring Oil or Hazardous Materials in Bulk— Letter of Intent and Operations Manual; and (5) 1625–0102, National Response Resource Inventory. Before submitting these ICRs to OMB, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below. DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before June 21, 2010. ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket [USCG–2010– 0266], please use only one of the following means: (1) Online: https:// www.regulations.gov. (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (DMF) (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001. (3) Hand deliver: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. (4) Fax: 202–493–2251. The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12–140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov. Copies of the ICRs are available through the docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from: Commandant (CG–611), Attn. Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd St., SW., Stop 7101, Washington, DC 20593–7101. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of Information Management, telephone 202–475–3523, or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20615-20616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0195]


Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices: Request for Comments 
and for Scientific Data and Information

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice; request for comments and for scientific data and 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting comments 
and scientific data and information that would assist the agency in its 
plans to conduct a risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices. The 
purpose of the risk profile is to ascertain the current state of 
knowledge about spices contaminated with microbiological pathogens and/
or filth, and the effectiveness of current and potential new 
interventions to reduce or prevent illnesses from contaminated spices.

DATES:  Submit electronic or written comments and scientific data and 
information by June 21, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit electronic comments and scientific data and 
information to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments and 
scientific data and information to the Division of Dockets Management 
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sherri B. Dennis, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-005), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-1914.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    A risk profile is a science-based document that describes the 
current state of knowledge about a specific food safety problem or 
issue and provides an evaluation of the data and information to support 
current interventions or new approaches to reduce or prevent illnesses 
(Ref. 1). FDA has adapted this tool as a new approach to assist the 
agency in its regulatory decisionmaking. Unlike a quantitative risk 
assessment, which provides information about the number of people 
affected by a hazard in food and how this number might be changed if 
various control options were implemented, a risk profile provides 
qualitative answers to questions about the hazard and options for 
controlling it, based on available data. The information in a risk 
profile may affect a range of decisions, such as whether or not to 
commission a quantitative risk assessment or a request for research, or 
whether or not to implement an immediate and/or provisional regulatory 
decision. In some cases, it may reveal that no further action is 
needed.
    The risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices will provide 
information for FDA to use in the development of plans to reduce or 
prevent illness from spices contaminated by microbial pathogens and/or 
filth. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of current control measures 
to reduce or prevent illness from spices have been renewed by recent 
outbreaks of Salmonella associated with spices, including the imported 
ground white and black pepper products linked to an April 2009 outbreak 
of Salmonella Rissen illness, and the black and red pepper products 
recalled in March 2010 in response to an outbreak of Salmonella 
Montevideo illness (Refs. 2 and 3).
    For the purpose of this risk profile, the term ``spice'' means any 
aromatic vegetable substances in the whole, broken, or ground form, 
except for those substances which have been traditionally regarded as 
foods, whose significant function in food is seasoning rather than 
nutritional, and from which no portion of any volatile oil or other 
flavoring principle has been removed. The specific hazards in spices to 
be considered in this risk profile include those microbiological 
pathogens and filth in spices that are identified in the published 
literature, outbreaks, recalls, and submissions to the Reportable Food 
Registry (RFR).\1\ For purposes of this risk profile, FDA considers 
``filth'' to mean ``extraneous materials'' as defined in FDA's Defect 
Levels Handbook (Ref. 4). The Defect Levels Handbook defines 
``extraneous materials'' as ``any foreign matter in a product 
associated with objectionable conditions or practices in production, 
storage, or distribution * * * [including] objectionable matter 
contributed by insects, rodents, and birds; decomposed material; and 
miscellaneous matter such as sand, soil, glass, rust, or other foreign 
substances.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The RFR is an electronic portal where responsible parties 
are required to file a report when there is a reasonable probability 
that the use of, or exposure to, an article of food will cause 
serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals 
(Ref. 5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The overall objectives of the risk profile are to:
     Describe the nature and extent of the public health risk, 
by identifying the most commonly occurring microbial and filth hazards 
in spices;
     Describe and evaluate current mitigation and control 
options;
     Identify potential additional mitigation or control 
options;
     Identify research needs and data gaps.
    The specific questions to be addressed by the risk profile include:
     What is known about the frequency and levels of pathogen 
and/or filth contamination of spices throughout the food supply chain 
(e.g., on the farm, at primary processing/manufacturing, intermediary 
processing (where spices are used as ingredients in multi-component 
products), distribution (including importation), retail sale/use, and 
the consumer's home)?
     What is known about differences in production and 
contamination of imported and domestic spices?
     What is known about the effectiveness, cost, and 
practicality of currently available and potential future interventions 
to prevent human illnesses associated with pathogen and/or filth 
contamination of spices (e.g., practices and/or technologies to reduce 
or prevent contamination, surveillance, inspection, import strategies, 
or guidance)?
     What are the highest priority research needs related to 
prevention or reduction of pathogens and/or filth in spices?

II. Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information

    FDA is requesting comments on the risk profile approach outlined 
previously in this document and the submission of scientific data and 
information relevant to the risk profile. The agency is particularly 
interested in the following types of information:
    1. Data, including unpublished data, on the incidence of 
contamination in spices according to:
    a. Date tested,
    b. Country exporting the spice and/or country of origin if 
different,
    c. Type of spice,
    d. Pathogen(s) and/or filth type (e.g., insect, rodent, 
extraneous),
    e. Quantitative (enumeration) or qualitative (presence/absence) 
results, and
    f. Other product sample information (e.g., pre- or post-treatment, 
treatment type, stage of production/processing).

[[Page 20616]]

    2. Factors that influence the survival, growth, and levels of 
pathogens in spices including:
    a. On-farm practices,
    b. Manufacturing, processing, or marketing practices,
    c. Shipping, storage, and distribution practices,
    d. Storage conditions encountered throughout the farm-to-table 
continuum, and
    e. Pathways for transfer of pathogens to spices, including data on 
frequencies or amounts of transfer (e.g., cross-contamination 
potential).
    3. Consumption patterns (including serving size and frequency) in 
the United States.
    4. Intended use (e.g., ready-to-eat, ingredient in a prepared 
food).
    5. Manufacturing practices, including the use of spices as 
ingredients in prepared foods.
    6. Data, including unpublished data, on the identity and 
effectiveness of control measures or interventions to reduce levels and 
frequency of pathogens and/or filth in spices during growing, 
harvesting, processing, manufacturing, packaging, storage, and 
transportation prior to retail sale including:
    a. Description of treatment or other control measure,
    b. Country exporting spice using this treatment/control measure,
    c. Name of the specific spice and its form (e.g., whole, cracked, 
ground),
    d. Effect of the treatment/control measure on pathogen and/or filth 
levels, and
    e. Types of validation protocols used to verify the effectiveness 
of treatment/control measures.
    7. Data relating to supplier specifications including required 
treatments, performance standards, microbial testing, and audit 
programs.
    8. Any other data related to the occurrence and control of 
pathogens and/or filth in spices that are applicable to the risk 
profile.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and scientific data and 
information regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic 
comments and scientific data and information to https://www.regulations.gov or two copies of any mailed comments and scientific 
data and information, except that individuals may submit one paper 
copy. Submissions are to be identified with the docket number found in 
brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments and 
scientific data and information may be seen in the Division of Dockets 
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. References

    We have placed the following references on display in the Division 
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). You may see them between 9 a.m. 
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. FDA has verified the Web site 
addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to the 
Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal Register.
    1. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 19th Procedural Manual, https://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/procedural_manual.jsp, accessed 
April 13, 2010.
    2. Food and Drug Administration, ``FDA Alerts the Public to 
Uncle Chen and Lian How Brand Dry Spice Product Recall,'' April 2, 
2009, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2009/ucm149555.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
    3. Food and Drug Administration, ``FDA Update on the 
Investigation into the Salmonella Montevideo Outbreak,'' March 17, 
2010, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm204917.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
    4. Food and Drug Administration, Defect Levels Handbook, https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/Sanitation/ucm056174.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
    5. Food and Drug Administration, ``Reportable Food Registry for 
Industry,'' https://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/FoodSafetyPrograms/RFR/default.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.

    Dated: April 14, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-9010 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.