Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices: Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information, 20615-20616 [2010-9010]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
Dated: April 8, 2010.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–8831 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0195]
Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in
Spices: Request for Comments and for
Scientific Data and Information
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments
and for scientific data and information.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is requesting
comments and scientific data and
information that would assist the agency
in its plans to conduct a risk profile for
pathogens and filth in spices. The
purpose of the risk profile is to ascertain
the current state of knowledge about
spices contaminated with
microbiological pathogens and/or filth,
and the effectiveness of current and
potential new interventions to reduce or
prevent illnesses from contaminated
spices.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments and scientific data and
information by June 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments and scientific data and
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments and scientific data and
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherri B. Dennis, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–1914.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A risk profile is a science-based
document that describes the current
state of knowledge about a specific food
safety problem or issue and provides an
evaluation of the data and information
to support current interventions or new
approaches to reduce or prevent
illnesses (Ref. 1). FDA has adapted this
tool as a new approach to assist the
agency in its regulatory decisionmaking.
Unlike a quantitative risk assessment,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
which provides information about the
number of people affected by a hazard
in food and how this number might be
changed if various control options were
implemented, a risk profile provides
qualitative answers to questions about
the hazard and options for controlling it,
based on available data. The
information in a risk profile may affect
a range of decisions, such as whether or
not to commission a quantitative risk
assessment or a request for research, or
whether or not to implement an
immediate and/or provisional regulatory
decision. In some cases, it may reveal
that no further action is needed.
The risk profile for pathogens and
filth in spices will provide information
for FDA to use in the development of
plans to reduce or prevent illness from
spices contaminated by microbial
pathogens and/or filth. Concerns
regarding the effectiveness of current
control measures to reduce or prevent
illness from spices have been renewed
by recent outbreaks of Salmonella
associated with spices, including the
imported ground white and black
pepper products linked to an April 2009
outbreak of Salmonella Rissen illness,
and the black and red pepper products
recalled in March 2010 in response to
an outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo
illness (Refs. 2 and 3).
For the purpose of this risk profile,
the term ‘‘spice’’ means any aromatic
vegetable substances in the whole,
broken, or ground form, except for those
substances which have been
traditionally regarded as foods, whose
significant function in food is seasoning
rather than nutritional, and from which
no portion of any volatile oil or other
flavoring principle has been removed.
The specific hazards in spices to be
considered in this risk profile include
those microbiological pathogens and
filth in spices that are identified in the
published literature, outbreaks, recalls,
and submissions to the Reportable Food
Registry (RFR).1 For purposes of this
risk profile, FDA considers ‘‘filth’’ to
mean ‘‘extraneous materials’’ as defined
in FDA’s Defect Levels Handbook (Ref.
4). The Defect Levels Handbook defines
‘‘extraneous materials’’ as ‘‘any foreign
matter in a product associated with
objectionable conditions or practices in
production, storage, or distribution
* * * [including] objectionable matter
contributed by insects, rodents, and
birds; decomposed material; and
1 The RFR is an electronic portal where
responsible parties are required to file a report
when there is a reasonable probability that the use
of, or exposure to, an article of food will cause
serious adverse health consequences or death to
humans or animals (Ref. 5).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20615
miscellaneous matter such as sand, soil,
glass, rust, or other foreign substances.’’
The overall objectives of the risk
profile are to:
• Describe the nature and extent of
the public health risk, by identifying the
most commonly occurring microbial
and filth hazards in spices;
• Describe and evaluate current
mitigation and control options;
• Identify potential additional
mitigation or control options;
• Identify research needs and data
gaps.
The specific questions to be addressed
by the risk profile include:
• What is known about the frequency
and levels of pathogen and/or filth
contamination of spices throughout the
food supply chain (e.g., on the farm, at
primary processing/manufacturing,
intermediary processing (where spices
are used as ingredients in multicomponent products), distribution
(including importation), retail sale/use,
and the consumer’s home)?
• What is known about differences in
production and contamination of
imported and domestic spices?
• What is known about the
effectiveness, cost, and practicality of
currently available and potential future
interventions to prevent human
illnesses associated with pathogen and/
or filth contamination of spices (e.g.,
practices and/or technologies to reduce
or prevent contamination, surveillance,
inspection, import strategies, or
guidance)?
• What are the highest priority
research needs related to prevention or
reduction of pathogens and/or filth in
spices?
II. Request for Comments and for
Scientific Data and Information
FDA is requesting comments on the
risk profile approach outlined
previously in this document and the
submission of scientific data and
information relevant to the risk profile.
The agency is particularly interested in
the following types of information:
1. Data, including unpublished data,
on the incidence of contamination in
spices according to:
a. Date tested,
b. Country exporting the spice and/or
country of origin if different,
c. Type of spice,
d. Pathogen(s) and/or filth type (e.g.,
insect, rodent, extraneous),
e. Quantitative (enumeration) or
qualitative (presence/absence)
results, and
f. Other product sample information
(e.g., pre- or post-treatment,
treatment type, stage of production/
processing).
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
20616
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 2010 / Notices
2. Factors that influence the survival,
growth, and levels of pathogens in
spices including:
a. On-farm practices,
b. Manufacturing, processing, or
marketing practices,
c. Shipping, storage, and distribution
practices,
d. Storage conditions encountered
throughout the farm-to-table
continuum, and
e. Pathways for transfer of pathogens
to spices, including data on
frequencies or amounts of transfer
(e.g., cross-contamination
potential).
3. Consumption patterns (including
serving size and frequency) in the
United States.
4. Intended use (e.g., ready-to-eat,
ingredient in a prepared food).
5. Manufacturing practices, including
the use of spices as ingredients in
prepared foods.
6. Data, including unpublished data,
on the identity and effectiveness of
control measures or interventions to
reduce levels and frequency of
pathogens and/or filth in spices during
growing, harvesting, processing,
manufacturing, packaging, storage, and
transportation prior to retail sale
including:
a. Description of treatment or other
control measure,
b. Country exporting spice using this
treatment/control measure,
c. Name of the specific spice and its
form (e.g., whole, cracked, ground),
d. Effect of the treatment/control
measure on pathogen and/or filth
levels, and
e. Types of validation protocols used
to verify the effectiveness of
treatment/control measures.
7. Data relating to supplier
specifications including required
treatments, performance standards,
microbial testing, and audit programs.
8. Any other data related to the
occurrence and control of pathogens
and/or filth in spices that are applicable
to the risk profile.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
III. Comments
14:55 Apr 19, 2010
IV. References
We have placed the following
references on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
You may see them between 9 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday. FDA
has verified the Web site addresses, but
FDA is not responsible for any
subsequent changes to the Web sites
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.
1. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 19th
Procedural Manual, https://
www.codexalimentarius.net/web/
procedural_manual.jsp, accessed April 13,
2010.
2. Food and Drug Administration, ‘‘FDA
Alerts the Public to Uncle Chen and Lian
How Brand Dry Spice Product Recall,’’ April
2, 2009, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/
Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2009/
ucm149555.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
3. Food and Drug Administration, ‘‘FDA
Update on the Investigation into the
Salmonella Montevideo Outbreak,’’ March
17, 2010, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/
Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/
ucm204917.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
4. Food and Drug Administration, Defect
Levels Handbook, https://www.fda.gov/Food/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
GuidanceDocuments/Sanitation/
ucm056174.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
5. Food and Drug Administration,
‘‘Reportable Food Registry for Industry,’’
https://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/
FoodSafetyPrograms/RFR/default.htm,
accessed April 13, 2010.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–9010 Filed 4–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2010–0266]
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and scientific data and
information regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments and scientific data and
information to https://
www.regulations.gov or two copies of
any mailed comments and scientific
data and information, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Submissions are to be identified with
the docket number found in brackets in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
the heading of this document. Received
comments and scientific data and
information may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Jkt 220001
Information Collection Request to
Office of Management and Budget;
OMB Control Numbers: 1625–0007,
1625–0074, 1625–0084, 1625–0093, and
1625–0102
Coast Guard, DHS.
Sixty-day notice requesting
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit
Information Collection Requests (ICRs)
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Analyses to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
requesting an extension of its approval
for the following collections of
information: (1) 1625–0007,
Characteristics of Liquid Chemicals
Proposed for Bulk Water Movement; (2)
1625–0074, Direct User Fees for
Inspection or Examination of U.S. and
Foreign Commercial Vessels; (3) 1625–
0084, Audit Reports under the
International Safety Management Code;
(4) 1625–0093, Facilities Transferring
Oil or Hazardous Materials in Bulk—
Letter of Intent and Operations Manual;
and (5) 1625–0102, National Response
Resource Inventory. Before submitting
these ICRs to OMB, the Coast Guard is
inviting comments as described below.
DATES: Comments must reach the Coast
Guard on or before June 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate
submissions to the docket [USCG–2010–
0266], please use only one of the
following means:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(DMF) (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
(3) Hand deliver: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
The DMF maintains the public docket
for this Notice. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this Notice as
being available in the docket, will
become part of the docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
room W12–140 on the West Building
Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. You may also find the
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Copies of the ICRs are available
through the docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Additionally, copies are available from:
Commandant (CG–611), Attn.
Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2100 2nd St., SW., Stop
7101, Washington, DC 20593–7101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone
202–475–3523, or fax 202–475–3929, for
questions on these documents. Contact
Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20615-20616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9010]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0195]
Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices: Request for Comments
and for Scientific Data and Information
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments and for scientific data and
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting comments
and scientific data and information that would assist the agency in its
plans to conduct a risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices. The
purpose of the risk profile is to ascertain the current state of
knowledge about spices contaminated with microbiological pathogens and/
or filth, and the effectiveness of current and potential new
interventions to reduce or prevent illnesses from contaminated spices.
DATES: Submit electronic or written comments and scientific data and
information by June 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments and scientific data and
information to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments and
scientific data and information to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherri B. Dennis, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-005), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-1914.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A risk profile is a science-based document that describes the
current state of knowledge about a specific food safety problem or
issue and provides an evaluation of the data and information to support
current interventions or new approaches to reduce or prevent illnesses
(Ref. 1). FDA has adapted this tool as a new approach to assist the
agency in its regulatory decisionmaking. Unlike a quantitative risk
assessment, which provides information about the number of people
affected by a hazard in food and how this number might be changed if
various control options were implemented, a risk profile provides
qualitative answers to questions about the hazard and options for
controlling it, based on available data. The information in a risk
profile may affect a range of decisions, such as whether or not to
commission a quantitative risk assessment or a request for research, or
whether or not to implement an immediate and/or provisional regulatory
decision. In some cases, it may reveal that no further action is
needed.
The risk profile for pathogens and filth in spices will provide
information for FDA to use in the development of plans to reduce or
prevent illness from spices contaminated by microbial pathogens and/or
filth. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of current control measures
to reduce or prevent illness from spices have been renewed by recent
outbreaks of Salmonella associated with spices, including the imported
ground white and black pepper products linked to an April 2009 outbreak
of Salmonella Rissen illness, and the black and red pepper products
recalled in March 2010 in response to an outbreak of Salmonella
Montevideo illness (Refs. 2 and 3).
For the purpose of this risk profile, the term ``spice'' means any
aromatic vegetable substances in the whole, broken, or ground form,
except for those substances which have been traditionally regarded as
foods, whose significant function in food is seasoning rather than
nutritional, and from which no portion of any volatile oil or other
flavoring principle has been removed. The specific hazards in spices to
be considered in this risk profile include those microbiological
pathogens and filth in spices that are identified in the published
literature, outbreaks, recalls, and submissions to the Reportable Food
Registry (RFR).\1\ For purposes of this risk profile, FDA considers
``filth'' to mean ``extraneous materials'' as defined in FDA's Defect
Levels Handbook (Ref. 4). The Defect Levels Handbook defines
``extraneous materials'' as ``any foreign matter in a product
associated with objectionable conditions or practices in production,
storage, or distribution * * * [including] objectionable matter
contributed by insects, rodents, and birds; decomposed material; and
miscellaneous matter such as sand, soil, glass, rust, or other foreign
substances.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The RFR is an electronic portal where responsible parties
are required to file a report when there is a reasonable probability
that the use of, or exposure to, an article of food will cause
serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals
(Ref. 5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The overall objectives of the risk profile are to:
Describe the nature and extent of the public health risk,
by identifying the most commonly occurring microbial and filth hazards
in spices;
Describe and evaluate current mitigation and control
options;
Identify potential additional mitigation or control
options;
Identify research needs and data gaps.
The specific questions to be addressed by the risk profile include:
What is known about the frequency and levels of pathogen
and/or filth contamination of spices throughout the food supply chain
(e.g., on the farm, at primary processing/manufacturing, intermediary
processing (where spices are used as ingredients in multi-component
products), distribution (including importation), retail sale/use, and
the consumer's home)?
What is known about differences in production and
contamination of imported and domestic spices?
What is known about the effectiveness, cost, and
practicality of currently available and potential future interventions
to prevent human illnesses associated with pathogen and/or filth
contamination of spices (e.g., practices and/or technologies to reduce
or prevent contamination, surveillance, inspection, import strategies,
or guidance)?
What are the highest priority research needs related to
prevention or reduction of pathogens and/or filth in spices?
II. Request for Comments and for Scientific Data and Information
FDA is requesting comments on the risk profile approach outlined
previously in this document and the submission of scientific data and
information relevant to the risk profile. The agency is particularly
interested in the following types of information:
1. Data, including unpublished data, on the incidence of
contamination in spices according to:
a. Date tested,
b. Country exporting the spice and/or country of origin if
different,
c. Type of spice,
d. Pathogen(s) and/or filth type (e.g., insect, rodent,
extraneous),
e. Quantitative (enumeration) or qualitative (presence/absence)
results, and
f. Other product sample information (e.g., pre- or post-treatment,
treatment type, stage of production/processing).
[[Page 20616]]
2. Factors that influence the survival, growth, and levels of
pathogens in spices including:
a. On-farm practices,
b. Manufacturing, processing, or marketing practices,
c. Shipping, storage, and distribution practices,
d. Storage conditions encountered throughout the farm-to-table
continuum, and
e. Pathways for transfer of pathogens to spices, including data on
frequencies or amounts of transfer (e.g., cross-contamination
potential).
3. Consumption patterns (including serving size and frequency) in
the United States.
4. Intended use (e.g., ready-to-eat, ingredient in a prepared
food).
5. Manufacturing practices, including the use of spices as
ingredients in prepared foods.
6. Data, including unpublished data, on the identity and
effectiveness of control measures or interventions to reduce levels and
frequency of pathogens and/or filth in spices during growing,
harvesting, processing, manufacturing, packaging, storage, and
transportation prior to retail sale including:
a. Description of treatment or other control measure,
b. Country exporting spice using this treatment/control measure,
c. Name of the specific spice and its form (e.g., whole, cracked,
ground),
d. Effect of the treatment/control measure on pathogen and/or filth
levels, and
e. Types of validation protocols used to verify the effectiveness
of treatment/control measures.
7. Data relating to supplier specifications including required
treatments, performance standards, microbial testing, and audit
programs.
8. Any other data related to the occurrence and control of
pathogens and/or filth in spices that are applicable to the risk
profile.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and scientific data and
information regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic
comments and scientific data and information to https://www.regulations.gov or two copies of any mailed comments and scientific
data and information, except that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Submissions are to be identified with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments and
scientific data and information may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. References
We have placed the following references on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). You may see them between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. FDA has verified the Web site
addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to the
Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal Register.
1. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 19th Procedural Manual, https://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/procedural_manual.jsp, accessed
April 13, 2010.
2. Food and Drug Administration, ``FDA Alerts the Public to
Uncle Chen and Lian How Brand Dry Spice Product Recall,'' April 2,
2009, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2009/ucm149555.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
3. Food and Drug Administration, ``FDA Update on the
Investigation into the Salmonella Montevideo Outbreak,'' March 17,
2010, https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm204917.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
4. Food and Drug Administration, Defect Levels Handbook, https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/Sanitation/ucm056174.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
5. Food and Drug Administration, ``Reportable Food Registry for
Industry,'' https://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/FoodSafetyPrograms/RFR/default.htm, accessed April 13, 2010.
Dated: April 14, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-9010 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S