Request for Comment on a Proposal To Exempt, Pursuant to the Authority in Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares, 19619-19622 [2010-8630]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 72 / Thursday, April 15, 2010 / Notices
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Request for Comment on a Proposal
To Exempt, Pursuant to the Authority
in Section 4(c) of the Commodity
Exchange Act, the Trading and
Clearing of Certain Products Related to
ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and
ETFS Physical Silver Shares
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Order and
Request for comment.
SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or the
‘‘Commission’’) is proposing to exempt
the trading and clearing of certain
contracts called ‘‘options’’ and other
contracts called ‘‘security futures’’ on
each of ETFS Physical Swiss Gold
Shares (‘‘Gold Products’’) and ETFS
Physical Silver Shares (‘‘Silver
Products’’) (collectively, ‘‘Gold and
Silver Products’’), which would be
traded on national securities exchanges
(as to options) and designated contract
markets registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) as
limited purpose national securities
exchanges (as to security futures), and
in either case cleared through the
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in
its capacity as a registered securities
clearing agency, from the provisions of
the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) 1
and the regulations thereunder, to the
extent necessary to permit them to be so
traded and cleared. Authority for this
exemption is found in Section 4(c) of
the CEA.2 The Commission also is
requesting comment on whether it
should amend all orders issued
exempting the trading and clearing of
options and futures on gold and silver
products from CEA provisions and
Commission regulations thereunder, to
impose market and large trader
reporting requirements under
Commission regulations to the trading
and clearing of the options in order to
assist the Commission in monitoring
and addressing, among other things, the
effect on designated contract markets of
trading in such products.3
17
U.S.C. 1 et seq.
U.S.C. 6(c).
3 The Commission has provided exemptions for
gold and silver products on two prior occasions.
See Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of
Certain Products Related to SPDR® Gold Trust
Shares, 73 FR 31981 (June 5, 2008), Order
Exempting the Trading and Clearing of SPDR Gold
Futures Contracts, 73 FR 31979 (June 5, 2008), and
Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of
Certain Products Related to iShares® COMEX Gold
Trust Shares and iShares® Silver Trust Shares, 73
FR 79830 (December 30, 2008) (collectively, the
‘‘Previous Orders.’’).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
27
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:43 Apr 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ETFSShares@cftc.gov.
Include ‘‘Options and Security Futures
on ETFS Gold and Silver Products’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: 202–418–5521.
• Mail: Send to David A. Stawick,
Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581.
• Courier: Same as mail above.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.CFTC.gov/. All comments must be
in English or, if not, accompanied by an
English translation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert B. Wasserman, Associate
Director, 202–418–5092,
rwasserman@cftc.gov, or Lois J. Gregory,
Special Counsel, 202–418–5569,
lgregory@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing
and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The OCC is both a Derivatives
Clearing Organization (‘‘DCO’’)
registered pursuant to Section 5b of the
CEA,4 and a securities clearing agency
registered pursuant to Section 17A of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘the ’34 Act’’).5
OCC has filed with the CFTC,
pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the CEA
and Commission Regulations 39.4(a)
and 40.5 thereunder,6 a request for
approval of rules and rule amendments
that would enable OCC (1) to clear and
settle contracts called ‘‘options’’
(‘‘Options’’) on Gold and Silver Products
traded on national securities exchanges,
in its capacity as a registered securities
clearing agency (and not in its capacity
as a DCO) and (2) to clear and settle
contracts called ‘‘security futures’’
(‘‘Security Futures’’) on Gold and Silver
Products traded on designated contract
markets 7 registered with the SEC as
limited purpose national securities
exchanges pursuant to Section 6(g) of
the ’34 Act 8 (‘‘DCMs’’) as security
47
U.S.C. 7a–1.
U.S.C. 78q–l.
6 7 U.S.C. 7a–2(c), 17 CFR 39.4(a), 40.5.
7 See Section 5 of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(g).
5 15
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19619
futures subject to the CEA and CFTC
regulations thereunder governing
security futures, in OCC’s capacity as a
registered securities clearing agency
(and not in its capacity as a DCO).9
Section 5c(c)(3) provides that the CFTC
must approve such rules and rule
amendments submitted for approval
unless it finds that the rules or rule
amendments would violate the CEA.
In each case, the shares of the ETFS
Gold Trust and the ETFS Silver Trust
are designed to reflect the performance
of the price of gold and silver bullion,
respectively, less the expenses of Trust
operations. The shares of each Trust
represent beneficial interest in the Trust
which in turn holds physical allocated
gold bullion (ETFS Gold Trust) and
silver bullion (ETFS Silver Trust). The
gold and silver bullion is held in vault
by or on behalf of the Trust’s custodian.
Each physical bar is properly segregated
and allocated to the property of the
Trust. All physical gold and silver
conforms to the London Bullion Market
Association’s rules for good delivery.
ETFS Gold Trust Shares and ETFS
Silver Trust Shares are listed and traded
on NYSEArca.
II. Section 4(c) of the Commodity
Exchange Act
Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA empowers
the CFTC to ‘‘promote responsible
economic or financial innovation and
fair competition’’ by exempting any
transaction or class of transactions from
any of the provisions of the CEA
(subject to exceptions not relevant here)
where the Commission determines that
the exemption would be consistent with
the public interest.10 The Commission
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61591
(February 25, 2010), 75 FR 9981 (March 4,
2010)(File No. SR–OCC–2009–20 filed with both
the Commission and the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’)). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 61483 (February 3, 2010), 75 FR
6753 (February 10, 2010)(SEC approval of securities
exchanges’ listing and trading options on ETFS
Gold Trust and ETFS Silver Trust).
10 Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(1),
provides in full that:
In order to promote responsible economic or
financial innovation and fair competition, the
Commission by rule, regulation, or order, after
notice and opportunity for hearing, may (on its own
initiative or on application of any person, including
any board of trade designated or registered as a
contract market or derivatives transaction execution
facility for transactions for future delivery in any
commodity under section 7 of this title) exempt any
agreement, contract, or transaction (or class thereof)
that is otherwise subject to subsection (a) of this
section (including any person or class of persons
offering, entering into, rendering advice or
rendering other services with respect to, the
agreement, contract, or transaction), either
unconditionally or on stated terms or conditions or
for stated periods and either retroactively or
prospectively, or both, from any of the requirements
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
Continued
15APN1
19620
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 72 / Thursday, April 15, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
may grant such an exemption by rule,
regulation or order, after notice and
opportunity for hearing, and may do so
on application of any person or on its
own initiative.
In enacting Section 4(c), Congress
noted that the goal of the provision ‘‘is
to give the Commission a means of
providing certainty and stability to
existing and emerging markets so that
financial innovation and market
development can proceed in an effective
and competitive manner.’’ 11 Permitting
Options and Security Futures on Gold
and Silver Products to trade on national
securities exchanges (as to Options) and
DCMs (as to Security Futures) and in
either case to be cleared by OCC in its
capacity as a securities clearing agency,
as discussed above, may foster both
financial innovation and competition. In
accordance with the Memorandum of
Understanding entered into between the
CFTC and the SEC on March 11, 2008,
and in particular the addendum thereto
concerning Principles Governing the
Review of Novel Derivative Products, the
Commission has permitted novel
derivative products that implicate areas
of potential overlapping regulatory
concern to be permitted to trade in
either or both a CFTC- or SEC-regulated
environment, in a manner consistent
with laws and regulations (including the
appropriate use of all available
exemptive and interpretive authority).
The CFTC is requesting comment on
whether it should exempt Options and
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products, as described above, that are
traded on a national securities exchange
or a DCM, respectively, and cleared
through OCC in its capacity as a
registered securities clearing agency,
from the CEA and the Commission’s
regulations thereunder, to the extent
necessary to permit them to be so traded
and cleared. The CFTC previously
granted exemptions for similar Options
and Security Futures on June 5 and
December 30, 2008.12
In proposing this exemption, the
CFTC need not—and does not—find
that Options on the Gold and Silver
Products are (or are not) options subject
to the CEA, or find that Security Futures
on the Gold and Silver Products are (or
are not) security futures as defined in
of subsection (a) of this section, or from any other
provision of this chapter (except subparagraphs
(c)(ii) and (D) of section 2(a)(1) of this title, except
that the Commission and the Securities and
Exchange Commission may by rule, regulation, or
order jointly exclude any agreement, contract, or
transaction from section 2(a)(1)(D) of this title), if
the Commission determines that the exemption
would be consistent with the public interest.
11 House Conf. Report No. 102–978, 1992
U.S.C.C.A.N. 3179, 3213 (‘‘4(c) Conf. Report’’).
12 See footnote 3, above.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:43 Apr 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Section 1a(31) of the CEA.13 During the
legislative process leading to the
enactment of Section 4(c) of the CEA,
the House-Senate Conference
Committee noted that:
fair competition among boards of trade,
other markets and market
participants.’’16 It may be consistent
with these and the other purposes of the
CEA, with the public interest, with the
CFTC–SEC Memorandum of
The Conferees do not intend that the
Understanding of March 11, 2008, and
exercise of exemptive authority by the
with the addendum thereto, for the
Commission would require any
determination beforehand that the agreement, mode of trading and clearing the
instrument, or transaction for which an
Options and Security Futures on Gold
exemption is sought is subject to the Act.
and Silver Products—whether the mode
Rather, this provision provides flexibility for
applicable to options on securities or
the Commission to provide legal certainty to
commodities, or to security futures or
novel instruments where the determination
futures—to be determined by
as to jurisdiction is not straightforward.
competitive market forces. Accordingly,
Rather than making a finding as to whether
a product is or is not a futures contract, the
the Commission proposes to use its
Commission in appropriate cases may
authority under Section 4(c) of the Act
14
proceed directly to issuing an exemption.
to exempt the trading of Options on
Gold and Silver Products on national
The Options and Security Futures on
securities exchanges and clearing
Gold and Silver Products described
thereof by OCC in its capacity as a
above raise questions involving their
registered securities clearing agency
nature and the appropriate resulting
from the CEA and the Commission’s
jurisdiction over them. Given their
regulations thereunder to the extent
potential usefulness to the market,
necessary to permit them to be so traded
however, the Commission believes that
and cleared. In addition, the
this may be an appropriate case for
issuing an exemption without making a
Commission proposes to use its
finding as to the nature of these
authority under Section 4(c) of the Act
particular instruments.
to exempt the trading and clearing of
Section 4(c)(2) provides that the
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Commission may grant exemptions only Products from those provisions of the
when it determines: That the
Act and the Commission’s regulations
requirements for which an exemption is thereunder that, if the underlying were
being provided should not be applied to considered to be a commodity that is
the agreements, contracts or transactions not a security, would be inconsistent
at issue, and the exemption is consistent with the trading and clearing of Security
with the public interest and the
Futures on Gold and Silver Products as
purposes of the CEA; that the
security futures. The proposed
agreements, contracts or transactions
exemption would require that
will be entered into solely between
transactions in such contracts comply
appropriate persons; and that the
with the requirements established for
exemption will not have a material
transactions in security futures by the
adverse effect on the ability of the
CEA and the Commission’s regulations
Commission or any contract market or
thereunder. The CFTC is requesting
derivatives transaction execution
comment as to whether these
facility to discharge its regulatory or
exemptions from the requirements of
self-regulatory responsibilities under the the CEA and regulations thereunder
15
CEA.
should be granted in the context of these
The purposes of the CEA include
transactions.
‘‘promot[ing] responsible innovation and
Section 4(c)(3) includes within the
term ‘‘appropriate persons’’ a number of
13 7 U.S.C. 1a(31).
specified categories of persons, and also
14 4(c) Conf. Report at 3214–3215.
in subparagraph (K) thereof ‘‘such other
15 Section 4(c)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(2),
persons that the Commission
provides in full that:
determines to be appropriate in light of
The Commission shall not grant any exemption
under paragraph (1) from any of the requirements
* * * the applicability of appropriate
of subsection (a) of this section unless the
regulatory protections.’’ National
Commission determines that—
securities exchanges and OCC, as well
(A) The requirement should not be applied to the
as their members who will intermediate
agreement, contract, or transaction for which the
Options on Gold and Silver Products,
exemption is sought and that the exemption would
be consistent with the public interest and the
are subject to extensive and detailed
purposes of this Act; and
regulation by the SEC under the ’34 Act.
(B) The agreement, contract, or transaction—
Similarly, DCMs and OCC, as well as
(i) Will be entered into solely between
their members who will intermediate
appropriate persons; and
(ii) Will not have a material adverse effect on the
ability of the Commission or any contract market or
derivatives transaction execution facility to
discharge its regulatory or self-regulatory duties
under this Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16 CEA 3(b), 7 U.S.C. 5(b). See also CEA 4(c)(1),
7 U.S.C. 6(c)(1) (purpose of exemptions is ‘‘to
promote responsible economic or financial
innovation and fair competition.’’).
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 72 / Thursday, April 15, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products, are subject to regulation by
the SEC and CFTC. The CFTC is
requesting comment as to whether all
persons trading Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products on
national securities exchanges and
DCMs, respectively, and clearing such
products on OCC, are appropriate
persons.
The Commission held a public
meeting on March 25, 2010 to examine
the trading of futures and options in the
precious and base metals market and
analyze how the Commission regulates
futures and options markets on
commodities of finite supply. The
Commission is considering the views
expressed at that meeting. For the time
being, the Commission continues to
decline to determine whether certain
products underlain by physical
commodities, such as the subject Gold
and Silver Products, are subject to the
Commission’s jurisdiction as
commodity options and futures
contracts. However, the Commission
may make such jurisdictional
determinations in the future, and such
determinations may inform the
Commission’s approach to
consideration of exemptive orders, and
of assessing the rules of registered
entities.
III. Large Trader Reporting; Market
and Financial Surveillance
The Commission is considering the
question of whether exemptions such as
the one discussed herein, as well as
those issued previously on substantially
similar options and futures on gold and
silver products, may interfere with the
Commission’s ability to discharge its
regulatory responsibilities under the
CEA or with the self-regulatory duties of
contract markets. Options and Security
Futures on gold and silver products can
be used by those trading them for the
same economic purposes served by
entering into commodity options and
security futures on gold and silver. As
a result of highly interconnected
physical and derivatives gold and silver
markets, the trading of Gold and Silver
Products that are options on national
securities exchanges, if traded in
sufficient volumes, can significantly
affect the price discovery function of
related commodity futures and option
contracts. In addition, the pools of
physical gold and silver aggregated by
these funds can materially affect
supplies that are deliverable under the
terms and conditions of related
commodity futures and options
contracts. In order to preserve the
integrity of the price discovery and risk
management functions of Commission
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:43 Apr 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
regulated markets, it may be that
national securities exchanges that list
the options should comply with market
reporting requirements and brokers and
traders that carry accounts or trade in
options on gold and silver products
should comply with large trader
reporting requirements.17 Positions on
security futures contracts on gold and
silver products are currently required to
be reported to the Commission by DCMs
and intermediaries.18 However, there is
no such reporting requirement with
respect to options on gold and silver
products that are exempted from being
treated as commodity options. Thus, the
Commission seeks comment as to
whether such reporting should be
required. Such information might
enhance the Commission’s ability to
collect and analyze market data
concerning trading in the markets for
gold and silver, and its ability
effectively to monitor the trading
activity and financial risk exposure of
market participants and thus the risk
exposure of any DCO, such as OCC,
clearing as central counterparty
(although in its capacity as a registered
securities clearing agency). If the
Commission determines to impose such
requirements as to the gold and silver
products that are the subject of the
current proposed order, or those that
were the subjects of the Previous
Orders, a separate notice and request for
comments will be issued setting forth
proposed specifics of such
requirements.
IV. Request for Comment
The Commission requests comment
on all aspects of the issues presented by
this proposed order.
V. Related Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) 19 imposes certain requirements
on Federal agencies (including the
Commission) in connection with their
conducting or sponsoring any collection
of information as defined by the PRA.
The proposed exemptive order would
not, if approved, require a new
17 See Parts 15 through 21 of the Commission’s
regulations.
18 Under Commission Regulation Section
15.03(b), 17 CFR § 15.03(b), the number of contracts
that constitute a reportable level for security futures
products on an individual equity security is 1,000.
In the instant case, when measured in terms of
ounces, reporting levels for Security Futures on
Gold and Silver Products would be significantly
less than that for futures contracts on gold and
silver currently trading on Comex. Thus, visibility
with respect to the Security Futures may be greater
than it would under large trader reporting
requirements.
19 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19621
collection of information from any
entities that would be subject to the
proposed order.
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA,20 as
amended by Section 119 of the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act
of 2000, requires the Commission to
consider the costs and benefits of its
action before issuing an order under the
CEA. By its terms, Section 15(a) as
amended does not require the
Commission to quantify the costs and
benefits of an order or to determine
whether the benefits of the order
outweigh its costs. Rather, Section 15(a)
simply requires the Commission to
‘‘consider the costs and benefits’’ of its
action.
Section 15(a) of the CEA further
specifies that costs and benefits shall be
evaluated in light of five broad areas of
market and public concern: Protection
of market participants and the public;
efficiency, competitiveness, and
financial integrity of futures markets;
price discovery; sound risk management
practices; and other public interest
considerations. Accordingly, the
Commission could in its discretion give
greater weight to any one of the five
enumerated areas and could in its
discretion determine that,
notwithstanding its costs, a particular
order was necessary or appropriate to
protect the public interest or to
effectuate any of the provisions or to
accomplish any of the purposes of the
CEA.
The Commission is considering the
costs and benefits of this proposed order
in light of the specific provisions of
Section 15(a) of the CEA, as follows: 21
1. Protection of market participants
and the public. National securities
exchanges, OCC, and their members
who would intermediate the abovedescribed Options and Security Futures
on Gold and Silver Products are subject
to extensive regulatory oversight.
2. Efficiency, competition, and
financial integrity. The proposed
exemption may enhance market
efficiency and competition since it
could encourage potential trading of
Options and Security Futures on Gold
and Silver Products through modes
other than those normally applicable;
that is, designated contract markets or
derivatives transaction execution
facilities. Financial integrity will not be
affected since the Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products
20 7
U.S.C. 19(a).
also Previous Orders, 73 FR at 31982 (June
5, 2008), 73 FR at 3 FR at 31980 (June 5, 2008), and
73 FR at 79832 (December 30, 2008).
21 See
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
19622
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 72 / Thursday, April 15, 2010 / Notices
will be cleared by OCC, a DCO and SECregistered clearing agency,
intermediated by SEC-registered brokerdealers.
3. Price discovery. Price discovery
may be enhanced through market
competition.
4. Sound risk management practices.
The Options and Security Futures on
Gold and Silver Products will be subject
to OCC’s current risk-management
practices including its margining
system.
5. Other public interest
considerations. The proposed
exemption may encourage development
of derivative products through market
competition without unnecessary
regulatory burden.
After considering these factors, the
Commission has determined to seek
comment on the proposed order as
discussed above. The Commission
invites public comment on its
application of the cost-benefit provision.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 9, 2010
by the Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
BILLING CODE P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, April 21,
2010, 9 a.m.–11 a.m.
PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
STATUS: Commission Meeting—Open to
the Public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pending
Decisional Matters: Testing and
Labeling to Product Certification—
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR)
and Testing Component Parts—Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).
A live webcast of the Meeting can be
viewed at https://www.cpsc.gov/webcast/
index.html.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:43 Apr 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–8805 Filed 4–13–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DOD–2010–OS–0048]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Notice to alter a system of
records.
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of
Defense proposes to alter a system of
records to its inventory of record
systems subject to the Privacy Act of
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: This proposed action would be
effective without further notice on May
17, 2010 unless comments are received
which result in a contrary
determination.
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
[FR Doc. 2010–8630 Filed 4–14–10; 8:45 am]
Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301)
504–7923.
Dated: April 13, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cindy Allard at (703) 588–6830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of the Secretary of Defense notices for
systems of records subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended,
have been published in the Federal
Register and are available from the
Chief, OSD/JS Privacy Office, Freedom
of Information Directorate, Washington
Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense
Pentagon, Washington DC 20301–1155.
The proposed system report, as
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was
submitted on March 31, 2010, to the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, the Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs,
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) pursuant to paragraph 4c
of Appendix I to OMB Circular No. A–
130, ‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities
for Maintaining Records About
Individuals’’ dated February 8, 1996
(February 20, 1996; 61 FR 6427).
Dated: April 12, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
DSCA 01
SYSTEM NAME:
International Affairs Personnel
Initiatives Database. (November 23,
2005; 70 FR 70789).
CHANGES:
*
*
*
*
*
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Delete entry and replace with
‘‘Civilians and military personnel
employed with the Department of
Defense who wish to become certified
by the DoD International Affairs
Certification Program, a voluntary
program sponsored by the Defense
Security Cooperation Agency and
Departments of the Army, Navy and Air
Force.’’
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘Full
name; e-mail address; work mailing
address, telephone and fax numbers.
Employment and education
information that includes if individual
is civilian or military; major command
and mailing address, name of
organization, office symbol/code, job
title, job function, grade/rank, job series,
military specialty, start date, total
months in International Affairs related
work, billet information, current
certification level, highest education
completed, and field of study.
Supervisor Information that consists of
first and last name, e-mail address,
organization, office symbol, work phone
and fax number.’’
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘10
U.S.C. 134, Under Secretary of Defense
for Policy and DoD Directive 5105.65,
Defense Security Cooperation Agency.’’
PURPOSE(S):
Delete entry and replace with
‘‘International Affairs Personnel
Initiatives Database (IAPID) is a single
central facility with the Department of
Defense (DoD) that maintains and
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 72 (Thursday, April 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19619-19622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8630]
[[Page 19619]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Request for Comment on a Proposal To Exempt, Pursuant to the
Authority in Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, the Trading
and Clearing of Certain Products Related to ETFS Physical Swiss Gold
Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Order and Request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'' or the
``Commission'') is proposing to exempt the trading and clearing of
certain contracts called ``options'' and other contracts called
``security futures'' on each of ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares (``Gold
Products'') and ETFS Physical Silver Shares (``Silver Products'')
(collectively, ``Gold and Silver Products''), which would be traded on
national securities exchanges (as to options) and designated contract
markets registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'') as limited purpose national securities exchanges (as to
security futures), and in either case cleared through the Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in its capacity as a registered
securities clearing agency, from the provisions of the Commodity
Exchange Act (``CEA'') \1\ and the regulations thereunder, to the
extent necessary to permit them to be so traded and cleared. Authority
for this exemption is found in Section 4(c) of the CEA.\2\ The
Commission also is requesting comment on whether it should amend all
orders issued exempting the trading and clearing of options and futures
on gold and silver products from CEA provisions and Commission
regulations thereunder, to impose market and large trader reporting
requirements under Commission regulations to the trading and clearing
of the options in order to assist the Commission in monitoring and
addressing, among other things, the effect on designated contract
markets of trading in such products.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
\2\ 7 U.S.C. 6(c).
\3\ The Commission has provided exemptions for gold and silver
products on two prior occasions. See Order Exempting the Trading and
Clearing of Certain Products Related to SPDR[supreg] Gold Trust
Shares, 73 FR 31981 (June 5, 2008), Order Exempting the Trading and
Clearing of SPDR Gold Futures Contracts, 73 FR 31979 (June 5, 2008),
and Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products
Related to iShares[supreg] COMEX Gold Trust Shares and
iShares[supreg] Silver Trust Shares, 73 FR 79830 (December 30, 2008)
(collectively, the ``Previous Orders.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: ETFSShares@cftc.gov. Include ``Options and
Security Futures on ETFS Gold and Silver Products'' in the subject line
of the message.
Fax: 202-418-5521.
Mail: Send to David A. Stawick, Secretary, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20581.
Courier: Same as mail above.
All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.CFTC.gov/. All comments must be in English or, if not, accompanied
by an English translation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert B. Wasserman, Associate
Director, 202-418-5092, rwasserman@cftc.gov, or Lois J. Gregory,
Special Counsel, 202-418-5569, lgregory@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing
and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The OCC is both a Derivatives Clearing Organization (``DCO'')
registered pursuant to Section 5b of the CEA,\4\ and a securities
clearing agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``the '34 Act'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 7 U.S.C. 7a-1.
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-l.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC has filed with the CFTC, pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the CEA
and Commission Regulations 39.4(a) and 40.5 thereunder,\6\ a request
for approval of rules and rule amendments that would enable OCC (1) to
clear and settle contracts called ``options'' (``Options'') on Gold and
Silver Products traded on national securities exchanges, in its
capacity as a registered securities clearing agency (and not in its
capacity as a DCO) and (2) to clear and settle contracts called
``security futures'' (``Security Futures'') on Gold and Silver Products
traded on designated contract markets \7\ registered with the SEC as
limited purpose national securities exchanges pursuant to Section 6(g)
of the '34 Act \8\ (``DCMs'') as security futures subject to the CEA
and CFTC regulations thereunder governing security futures, in OCC's
capacity as a registered securities clearing agency (and not in its
capacity as a DCO).\9\ Section 5c(c)(3) provides that the CFTC must
approve such rules and rule amendments submitted for approval unless it
finds that the rules or rule amendments would violate the CEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c), 17 CFR 39.4(a), 40.5.
\7\ See Section 5 of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(g).
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61591 (February 25,
2010), 75 FR 9981 (March 4, 2010)(File No. SR-OCC-2009-20 filed with
both the Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'')). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61483
(February 3, 2010), 75 FR 6753 (February 10, 2010)(SEC approval of
securities exchanges' listing and trading options on ETFS Gold Trust
and ETFS Silver Trust).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In each case, the shares of the ETFS Gold Trust and the ETFS Silver
Trust are designed to reflect the performance of the price of gold and
silver bullion, respectively, less the expenses of Trust operations.
The shares of each Trust represent beneficial interest in the Trust
which in turn holds physical allocated gold bullion (ETFS Gold Trust)
and silver bullion (ETFS Silver Trust). The gold and silver bullion is
held in vault by or on behalf of the Trust's custodian. Each physical
bar is properly segregated and allocated to the property of the Trust.
All physical gold and silver conforms to the London Bullion Market
Association's rules for good delivery. ETFS Gold Trust Shares and ETFS
Silver Trust Shares are listed and traded on NYSEArca.
II. Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act
Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA empowers the CFTC to ``promote
responsible economic or financial innovation and fair competition'' by
exempting any transaction or class of transactions from any of the
provisions of the CEA (subject to exceptions not relevant here) where
the Commission determines that the exemption would be consistent with
the public interest.\10\ The Commission
[[Page 19620]]
may grant such an exemption by rule, regulation or order, after notice
and opportunity for hearing, and may do so on application of any person
or on its own initiative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(1), provides in
full that:
In order to promote responsible economic or financial innovation
and fair competition, the Commission by rule, regulation, or order,
after notice and opportunity for hearing, may (on its own initiative
or on application of any person, including any board of trade
designated or registered as a contract market or derivatives
transaction execution facility for transactions for future delivery
in any commodity under section 7 of this title) exempt any
agreement, contract, or transaction (or class thereof) that is
otherwise subject to subsection (a) of this section (including any
person or class of persons offering, entering into, rendering advice
or rendering other services with respect to, the agreement,
contract, or transaction), either unconditionally or on stated terms
or conditions or for stated periods and either retroactively or
prospectively, or both, from any of the requirements of subsection
(a) of this section, or from any other provision of this chapter
(except subparagraphs (c)(ii) and (D) of section 2(a)(1) of this
title, except that the Commission and the Securities and Exchange
Commission may by rule, regulation, or order jointly exclude any
agreement, contract, or transaction from section 2(a)(1)(D) of this
title), if the Commission determines that the exemption would be
consistent with the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In enacting Section 4(c), Congress noted that the goal of the
provision ``is to give the Commission a means of providing certainty
and stability to existing and emerging markets so that financial
innovation and market development can proceed in an effective and
competitive manner.'' \11\ Permitting Options and Security Futures on
Gold and Silver Products to trade on national securities exchanges (as
to Options) and DCMs (as to Security Futures) and in either case to be
cleared by OCC in its capacity as a securities clearing agency, as
discussed above, may foster both financial innovation and competition.
In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding entered into between
the CFTC and the SEC on March 11, 2008, and in particular the addendum
thereto concerning Principles Governing the Review of Novel Derivative
Products, the Commission has permitted novel derivative products that
implicate areas of potential overlapping regulatory concern to be
permitted to trade in either or both a CFTC- or SEC-regulated
environment, in a manner consistent with laws and regulations
(including the appropriate use of all available exemptive and
interpretive authority). The CFTC is requesting comment on whether it
should exempt Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products,
as described above, that are traded on a national securities exchange
or a DCM, respectively, and cleared through OCC in its capacity as a
registered securities clearing agency, from the CEA and the
Commission's regulations thereunder, to the extent necessary to permit
them to be so traded and cleared. The CFTC previously granted
exemptions for similar Options and Security Futures on June 5 and
December 30, 2008.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ House Conf. Report No. 102-978, 1992 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3179,
3213 (``4(c) Conf. Report'').
\12\ See footnote 3, above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In proposing this exemption, the CFTC need not--and does not--find
that Options on the Gold and Silver Products are (or are not) options
subject to the CEA, or find that Security Futures on the Gold and
Silver Products are (or are not) security futures as defined in Section
1a(31) of the CEA.\13\ During the legislative process leading to the
enactment of Section 4(c) of the CEA, the House-Senate Conference
Committee noted that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 7 U.S.C. 1a(31).
The Conferees do not intend that the exercise of exemptive
authority by the Commission would require any determination
beforehand that the agreement, instrument, or transaction for which
an exemption is sought is subject to the Act. Rather, this provision
provides flexibility for the Commission to provide legal certainty
to novel instruments where the determination as to jurisdiction is
not straightforward. Rather than making a finding as to whether a
product is or is not a futures contract, the Commission in
appropriate cases may proceed directly to issuing an exemption.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 4(c) Conf. Report at 3214-3215.
The Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products
described above raise questions involving their nature and the
appropriate resulting jurisdiction over them. Given their potential
usefulness to the market, however, the Commission believes that this
may be an appropriate case for issuing an exemption without making a
finding as to the nature of these particular instruments.
Section 4(c)(2) provides that the Commission may grant exemptions
only when it determines: That the requirements for which an exemption
is being provided should not be applied to the agreements, contracts or
transactions at issue, and the exemption is consistent with the public
interest and the purposes of the CEA; that the agreements, contracts or
transactions will be entered into solely between appropriate persons;
and that the exemption will not have a material adverse effect on the
ability of the Commission or any contract market or derivatives
transaction execution facility to discharge its regulatory or self-
regulatory responsibilities under the CEA.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Section 4(c)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(2), provides in
full that:
The Commission shall not grant any exemption under paragraph (1)
from any of the requirements of subsection (a) of this section
unless the Commission determines that--
(A) The requirement should not be applied to the agreement,
contract, or transaction for which the exemption is sought and that
the exemption would be consistent with the public interest and the
purposes of this Act; and
(B) The agreement, contract, or transaction--
(i) Will be entered into solely between appropriate persons; and
(ii) Will not have a material adverse effect on the ability of
the Commission or any contract market or derivatives transaction
execution facility to discharge its regulatory or self-regulatory
duties under this Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purposes of the CEA include ``promot[ing] responsible
innovation and fair competition among boards of trade, other markets
and market participants.''\16\ It may be consistent with these and the
other purposes of the CEA, with the public interest, with the CFTC-SEC
Memorandum of Understanding of March 11, 2008, and with the addendum
thereto, for the mode of trading and clearing the Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products--whether the mode applicable to
options on securities or commodities, or to security futures or
futures--to be determined by competitive market forces. Accordingly,
the Commission proposes to use its authority under Section 4(c) of the
Act to exempt the trading of Options on Gold and Silver Products on
national securities exchanges and clearing thereof by OCC in its
capacity as a registered securities clearing agency from the CEA and
the Commission's regulations thereunder to the extent necessary to
permit them to be so traded and cleared. In addition, the Commission
proposes to use its authority under Section 4(c) of the Act to exempt
the trading and clearing of Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products from those provisions of the Act and the Commission's
regulations thereunder that, if the underlying were considered to be a
commodity that is not a security, would be inconsistent with the
trading and clearing of Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products as
security futures. The proposed exemption would require that
transactions in such contracts comply with the requirements established
for transactions in security futures by the CEA and the Commission's
regulations thereunder. The CFTC is requesting comment as to whether
these exemptions from the requirements of the CEA and regulations
thereunder should be granted in the context of these transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ CEA 3(b), 7 U.S.C. 5(b). See also CEA 4(c)(1), 7 U.S.C.
6(c)(1) (purpose of exemptions is ``to promote responsible economic
or financial innovation and fair competition.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4(c)(3) includes within the term ``appropriate persons'' a
number of specified categories of persons, and also in subparagraph (K)
thereof ``such other persons that the Commission determines to be
appropriate in light of * * * the applicability of appropriate
regulatory protections.'' National securities exchanges and OCC, as
well as their members who will intermediate Options on Gold and Silver
Products, are subject to extensive and detailed regulation by the SEC
under the '34 Act. Similarly, DCMs and OCC, as well as their members
who will intermediate
[[Page 19621]]
Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products, are subject to regulation
by the SEC and CFTC. The CFTC is requesting comment as to whether all
persons trading Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products on national securities exchanges and DCMs, respectively, and
clearing such products on OCC, are appropriate persons.
The Commission held a public meeting on March 25, 2010 to examine
the trading of futures and options in the precious and base metals
market and analyze how the Commission regulates futures and options
markets on commodities of finite supply. The Commission is considering
the views expressed at that meeting. For the time being, the Commission
continues to decline to determine whether certain products underlain by
physical commodities, such as the subject Gold and Silver Products, are
subject to the Commission's jurisdiction as commodity options and
futures contracts. However, the Commission may make such jurisdictional
determinations in the future, and such determinations may inform the
Commission's approach to consideration of exemptive orders, and of
assessing the rules of registered entities.
III. Large Trader Reporting; Market and Financial Surveillance
The Commission is considering the question of whether exemptions
such as the one discussed herein, as well as those issued previously on
substantially similar options and futures on gold and silver products,
may interfere with the Commission's ability to discharge its regulatory
responsibilities under the CEA or with the self-regulatory duties of
contract markets. Options and Security Futures on gold and silver
products can be used by those trading them for the same economic
purposes served by entering into commodity options and security futures
on gold and silver. As a result of highly interconnected physical and
derivatives gold and silver markets, the trading of Gold and Silver
Products that are options on national securities exchanges, if traded
in sufficient volumes, can significantly affect the price discovery
function of related commodity futures and option contracts. In
addition, the pools of physical gold and silver aggregated by these
funds can materially affect supplies that are deliverable under the
terms and conditions of related commodity futures and options
contracts. In order to preserve the integrity of the price discovery
and risk management functions of Commission regulated markets, it may
be that national securities exchanges that list the options should
comply with market reporting requirements and brokers and traders that
carry accounts or trade in options on gold and silver products should
comply with large trader reporting requirements.\17\ Positions on
security futures contracts on gold and silver products are currently
required to be reported to the Commission by DCMs and
intermediaries.\18\ However, there is no such reporting requirement
with respect to options on gold and silver products that are exempted
from being treated as commodity options. Thus, the Commission seeks
comment as to whether such reporting should be required. Such
information might enhance the Commission's ability to collect and
analyze market data concerning trading in the markets for gold and
silver, and its ability effectively to monitor the trading activity and
financial risk exposure of market participants and thus the risk
exposure of any DCO, such as OCC, clearing as central counterparty
(although in its capacity as a registered securities clearing agency).
If the Commission determines to impose such requirements as to the gold
and silver products that are the subject of the current proposed order,
or those that were the subjects of the Previous Orders, a separate
notice and request for comments will be issued setting forth proposed
specifics of such requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Parts 15 through 21 of the Commission's regulations.
\18\ Under Commission Regulation Section 15.03(b), 17 CFR Sec.
15.03(b), the number of contracts that constitute a reportable level
for security futures products on an individual equity security is
1,000. In the instant case, when measured in terms of ounces,
reporting levels for Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products
would be significantly less than that for futures contracts on gold
and silver currently trading on Comex. Thus, visibility with respect
to the Security Futures may be greater than it would under large
trader reporting requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Request for Comment
The Commission requests comment on all aspects of the issues
presented by this proposed order.
V. Related Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'') \19\ imposes certain
requirements on Federal agencies (including the Commission) in
connection with their conducting or sponsoring any collection of
information as defined by the PRA. The proposed exemptive order would
not, if approved, require a new collection of information from any
entities that would be subject to the proposed order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA,\20\ as amended by Section 119 of the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, requires the Commission to
consider the costs and benefits of its action before issuing an order
under the CEA. By its terms, Section 15(a) as amended does not require
the Commission to quantify the costs and benefits of an order or to
determine whether the benefits of the order outweigh its costs. Rather,
Section 15(a) simply requires the Commission to ``consider the costs
and benefits'' of its action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 7 U.S.C. 19(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 15(a) of the CEA further specifies that costs and benefits
shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas of market and public
concern: Protection of market participants and the public; efficiency,
competitiveness, and financial integrity of futures markets; price
discovery; sound risk management practices; and other public interest
considerations. Accordingly, the Commission could in its discretion
give greater weight to any one of the five enumerated areas and could
in its discretion determine that, notwithstanding its costs, a
particular order was necessary or appropriate to protect the public
interest or to effectuate any of the provisions or to accomplish any of
the purposes of the CEA.
The Commission is considering the costs and benefits of this
proposed order in light of the specific provisions of Section 15(a) of
the CEA, as follows: \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See also Previous Orders, 73 FR at 31982 (June 5, 2008), 73
FR at 3 FR at 31980 (June 5, 2008), and 73 FR at 79832 (December 30,
2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Protection of market participants and the public. National
securities exchanges, OCC, and their members who would intermediate the
above-described Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products are subject to extensive regulatory oversight.
2. Efficiency, competition, and financial integrity. The proposed
exemption may enhance market efficiency and competition since it could
encourage potential trading of Options and Security Futures on Gold and
Silver Products through modes other than those normally applicable;
that is, designated contract markets or derivatives transaction
execution facilities. Financial integrity will not be affected since
the Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products
[[Page 19622]]
will be cleared by OCC, a DCO and SEC-registered clearing agency,
intermediated by SEC-registered broker-dealers.
3. Price discovery. Price discovery may be enhanced through market
competition.
4. Sound risk management practices. The Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products will be subject to OCC's current
risk-management practices including its margining system.
5. Other public interest considerations. The proposed exemption may
encourage development of derivative products through market competition
without unnecessary regulatory burden.
After considering these factors, the Commission has determined to
seek comment on the proposed order as discussed above. The Commission
invites public comment on its application of the cost-benefit
provision.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 9, 2010 by the Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-8630 Filed 4-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P