Availability of Grant Funds for FY 2010, 19358-19363 [2010-8545]
Download as PDF
19358
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Redetermination of the Financial Ratios
Remand for Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Honey from
the People’s Republic of China for
Shanghai Eswell Enterprise Co., Ltd.,’’
dated February 11, 2008 (‘‘Eswell Final
Analysis Memo’’); Memorandum to the
File from Michael Quiqley, ‘‘Analysis
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Redetermination of the
Redetermination of the Financial Ratios
Remand for Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Honey from
the People’s Republic of China for Jinfu
Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ dated February 11,
2008 (‘‘Jinfu Trading Final Analysis
Memo’’); the Memorandum to the File
from Michael Quiqley, ‘‘Analysis
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Redetermination of the
Redetermination of the Financial Ratios
Remand for Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Honey from
the People’s Republic of China for
Zhejiang Native Produce and Animal
By-Products Import & Export Group
Corp.,’’ dated February 11, 2008
(‘‘Zhejiang Native Final Analysis
Memo’’).
There have been no other changes to
this analysis, except for the revised
financial ratio calculations to include
expenses for jars and corks as direct
materials used to producing finished
honey, for these amended final results.
In accordance with the Department’s
practice of issuing importer-specific
assessment rates, we will instruct the
United States Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to apply the importer
specific assessment rate for Shanghai
Eswell’s, Jinfu Trading’s, and Zhejiang
Native’s respective exports to the United
States. See Eswell Final Analysis Memo
at Attachment 3; Jinfu Trading Final
Analysis Memo at Attachment 3; and
Zhejiang Native Final Analysis Memo at
Attachment 3. The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of publication of the amended final
results of this review.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended.
Dated: April 5, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–8559 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 0907081109–0180–06]
RIN 0648–ZC10
Table of Contents
Availability of Grant Funds for FY 2010
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of availability of grant
funds for FY 2010.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NOAA publishes this notice
to solicit proposals for grant funding for
three NOAA Sea Grant Programs: (1) Sea
Grant Aquaculture Research Program
2010; (2) NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture
Extension and Technology Transfer
2010; and (3) NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic
Invasive Species 2010. This notice
supplements the agency’s solicitation
for applications published on January
19, 2010 entitled ‘‘Availability of Grant
Funds for Fiscal Year 2010’’ (75 FR
3209).
DATES: Proposals must be received by
the date and time specified under each
program listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
ADDRESSES: Proposals must be
submitted to the program address listed
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document. NOAA’s
discretionary grant fund notices may be
found on the Internet at Grants.gov. The
URL for Grants.gov is https://
www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
those applicants without Internet
access, you may request a copy of the
full funding opportunity announcement
and/or application kit from the person
listed as the information contact under
each program.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants must comply with all
requirements contained in the Federal
Funding Opportunity announcement for
each of the programs listed in this
notice. The Federal Funding
Opportunity announcements are
available at https://www.grants.gov.
The list of grant opportunities under
NOAA Project Competitions (below)
describes the basic information and
requirements for the competitive grant/
cooperative agreement programs offered
by NOAA. These programs are open to
anyone who meets the eligibility criteria
specified under each entry. To be
considered for an award under one of
the described competitive grant/
cooperative agreement programs,
eligible applicants must submit a
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
complete and responsive application to
the appropriate address by the deadline
specified in this notice. An award is
made upon conclusion of the evaluation
and selection process for the respective
program.
Sfmt 4703
I. Background
II. NOAA Project Competitions—Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research (OAR)
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Research
Program 2010
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension
and Technology Transfer 2010
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive
Species 2010
III. Relevant NOAA Mission Goal
IV. Classification
I. Background
In this notice, NOAA announces that
three programs are making funds
available for financial assistance
awards. Each entry for the following
grant opportunities provides: A
description of the program, funding
availability, statutory authority, Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number, application deadline, address
for submitting proposals, selection
criteria, evaluation criteria, information
contacts, eligibility requirements, cost
sharing requirements, and
intergovernmental review under
Executive Order 12372. Interested
applicants should consult the January
19, 2010 Federal Register Notice
entitled ‘‘Availability of Grant Funds for
Fiscal Year 2010’’ (75 FR 3209) for
additional information about submitting
an application to NOAA.
II. NOAA Project Competitions
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
(OAR)
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture
Research Program 2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea
Grant will make available up to
$6,000,000 for a national competition to
fund aquaculture research projects for
FY 2010 to FY 2011, as part of the
overall plan to support the development
of environmentally and economically
sustainable ocean, coastal or Great Lakes
aquaculture. The Federal Funding
Opportunity (FFO) announcement for
this competition is available on https://
grants.gov under FFO number NOAA–
OAR–SG–2010–2002488.
Funding Availability: Depending on
FY 2011 Congressional appropriations
and the quality of proposals, Sea Grant
expects to have available up to
$6,000,000 for aquaculture research
projects for FY 2010 to FY 2011, with
individual research projects funded at a
total of $50,000 to $400,000 in federal
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
(1) Research on technical aspects of
innovative mitigation or ‘smart design’
approaches to aquaculture, such as
integrated multi-trophic aquaculture or
other ways to design aquaculture
production in an ecosystem
management context; (2) Development
of planning tools or approaches to aid
site selection for new or expanded
aquaculture facilities in the context of
coastal and marine spatial planning
efforts, including planning and zoning
tools for coastal managers; and (3)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea Grant Support Research on the social and economic
issues associated with current and new
Application Deadline: Proposals must
marine aquaculture; and
be submitted by 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
(c) If the proposal includes a concrete,
May 25, 2010, regardless of where they
unambiguous specific desired outcome,
are submitted. State Sea Grant Programs and has a good chance of achieving that
must forward applications unchanged to outcome (including meeting stated
Grants.gov by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time,
performance measure targets).
June 8, 2010. Applications that are not
2. Technical/scientific merit
received by the deadline will not be
(maximum 35 points).
reviewed.
This assesses whether the approach is
Address for Submitting Proposals:
technically sound and/or innovative, if
Applicants from Sea Grant states must
the methods are appropriate, and
submit applications to the addresses
whether there are clear project goals and
provided by the appropriate State Sea
objectives. For this competition, this
Grant Program. Contact information for
ascertains:
Sea Grant Programs is available at
(a) The quality of the work plan, and
https://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/nsi/2010/ if it includes (if appropriate) plans for
eligible_2010.htm or may also be
identifying and conducting future
obtained by contacting the Information
research or other future actions;
Contact listed below.
(b) If the proposal includes all
Applicants NOT From Sea Grant
components (research, outreach,
States may submit their applications to
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the
a nearby State Sea Grant Program office, desired outcome and an effective plan to
or directly to Grants.gov (by the same
integrate all components;
date that applicants in Sea Grant states
(c) If the proposal includes one or
must send to their Sea Grant Program).
more of the performance measures
If submitted electronically via
identified in section I.A of the FFO,
Grants.gov, please indicate FFO number with targets. If it does not include these,
NOAA–OAR–SG–2010–2002488 in the
does it include well-formed, outcomeapplication.
based performance measures, with
If a Sea Grant Program or an applicant targets, and credibly demonstrate how
not from a Sea Grant State does not have achieving these performance measure
proven internet access, contact the
targets will lead to increased targets for
Information Contact listed below for
one or more of the performance
submission instructions.
measures in section I.A of the FFO; and
Evaluation Criteria:
(d) If the proposal includes a way to
1. Importance and/or relevance and
objectively determine its success at
applicability of proposed project to the
achieving its outcomes.
National Sea Grant program goals
3. Overall qualifications of applicants
(maximum 25 points).
(maximum 10 points).
This ascertains whether there is
This ascertains whether the applicant
intrinsic value in the proposed work
possesses the necessary education,
and/or relevance to NOAA, Federal,
experience, training, facilities, and
regional, State, or local activities. For
administrative resources to accomplish
this competition, this ascertains:
the project. This includes their record of
(a) If the impact of the proposed work achievement with previous funding.
will increase domestic marine
4. Project costs (maximum 15 points).
aquaculture production, contribute to
The budget is evaluated to determine
environmental sustainability, and
if it is realistic and commensurate with
advance the state of the industry,
the project needs and time-frame.
science, or state-of the-art methods for
5. Outreach and education (maximum
marine aquaculture;
15 points).
This criterion assesses whether this
(b) The degree to which the proposal
project provides a focused and effective
contributes to the following three top
education and outreach strategy
priorities for FY 2010 and FY 2011:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
funding (or $75,000 to $600,000 total
funding, including required non-Federal
matching funds) for up to a two-year
period. Additional match may be
applied, if appropriate. Given the
anticipated amount of funding and the
anticipated number and quality of
proposals submitted, approximately 15
projects of average Federal funding of
$400,000 are anticipated.
Statutory Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1121 et
seq.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19359
regarding NOAA’s mission to protect
the Nation’s natural resources. For this
competition, this ascertains if the
proposal includes a clear and objective
work plan for outreach strategy and
specific activities to maximize
dissemination of results to stakeholders.
Selection Procedures and Factors:
Upon receipt of a full application by
NOAA, an initial administrative review
will be conducted to determine
compliance with requirements and
completeness of the application. A merit
review will also be conducted to
produce a rank order of the proposals.
The NOAA Program Officer may review
the ranking of the proposals and make
recommendations to the Selecting
Official based on the administrative
and/or merit review(s) and selection
factors listed below. The Selecting
Official selects proposals after
considering the administrative and/or
merit review(s) and recommendations of
the Program Officer. In making the final
selections, the Selecting Official will
award in rank order unless the proposal
is justified to be selected out of rank
order based upon one or more of the
selection factors below. The Program
Officer and/or Selecting Official may
negotiate the funding level of the
proposal. The Selecting Official makes
final award recommendations to the
Grants Officer authorized to obligate the
funds.
The selection factors that the
Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects
funded or considered for funding by
NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy
factors.
5. Applicant’s prior award
performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of
targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary
for NOAA staff to make a National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
determination and draft necessary
documentation before recommendations
for funding are made to the Grants
Officer.
Information Contacts: Agency contact
for information regarding the NOAA Sea
Grant Aquaculture Research Program
2010 should be directed to Dr. Gene
Kim, 301–734–1281; via e-mail at
oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov;
Mailing Address: NOAA Sea Grant;
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
19360
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, R/SG;
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Eligibility: Institutions of higher
education, nonprofit organizations,
commercial organizations, State, local
and Indian tribal governments and
individuals are eligible. Federal
agencies and their personnel are not
permitted to receive Federal funding
under this competition; however,
Federal scientists can serve as partners
or co-Principal Investigators on research
proposals. Directors of the state Sea
Grant Programs are not eligible to
compete for funds under this
announcement, although for
administrative purposes, they will be
considered to be the Principal
Investigator for all awards made to their
state programs.
Cost Sharing Requirements: NonFederal matching funds equal to at least
50 percent of the Federal funding
request must be provided. In-kind
contributions can count towards this
matching requirement.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under this Program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture
Extension and Technology Transfer
2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea
Grant will make available up to
$4,800,000 for a national competition to
fund aquaculture extension efforts for
FY 2010 to FY 2012, as part of the
overall plan to enhance aquaculture
extension (including technology
transfer) to support the development of
environmentally and economically
sustainable ocean, coastal or Great Lakes
aquaculture. Aquaculture extension is
expected to be conducted in cooperation
and partnership with state and Federal
aquaculture agencies and regional
management efforts. The Federal
Funding Opportunity (FFO)
announcement for this competition is
available on https://grants.gov under
FFO number NOAA–OAR–SG–2010–
2002491.
Funding Availability: Depending on
FY 2011 and FY 2012 Congressional
appropriations and the quality of
proposals, Sea Grant expects to have
available up to $4,800,000 for
aquaculture extension efforts for FY
2010 to FY 2012. Each Sea Grant
Program can submit up to two separate
proposals. Each individual proposal can
be requested at a total of $50,000 to
$300,000 in Federal funding (or $75,000
to $450,000 total funding, including
required non-Federal matching funds)
for up to a three-year period; however,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
the maximum annual amount for each
proposal is $100,000 in Federal funding
per year. Given the anticipated amount
of funding and the anticipated number
and quality of proposals submitted,
approximately 16 projects of average
Federal funding $300,000 are
anticipated.
Statutory Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1121 et
seq.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea Grant
Support.
Application Deadline: Proposals must
be submitted by 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
May 25, 2010. Applications that are not
received by the deadline will not be
reviewed.
Address for Submitting Proposals:
Proposals must be submitted through
Grants.gov by the Sea Grant Program. If
an applicant does not have internet
access, contact the Information Contact
listed below.
Evaluation Criteria:
1. Importance and/or relevance and
applicability of proposed project to the
National Sea Grant program goals
(maximum 25 points).
This ascertains whether there is
intrinsic value in the proposed work
and/or relevance to NOAA, federal,
regional, State, or local activities. For
this competition, this ascertains:
(a) The degree of impact of the
proposed work to increase domestic
ocean, coastal or Great Lakes
aquaculture production, contribute to
environmental sustainability, and
advance the state of the industry,
science, or state-of the-art methods for
marine aquaculture; and
(b) The degree to which the proposal
includes a concrete, unambiguous
specific desired outcome, and has a
good chance of achieving that outcome
(including meeting stated performance
measure targets).
2. Technical/scientific merit
(maximum 20 points).
This assesses whether the approach is
technically sound and/or innovative, if
the methods are appropriate, and
whether there are clear project goals and
objectives. For this competition, this
ascertains:
(a) The quality of the work plan,
including (if appropriate) plans for
identifying and conducting future
research, extension, or other actions;
(b) If the proposal includes all
components (research, outreach,
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the
desired outcome. Is there an effective
plan for integrating all components?;
(c) If the proposal includes one or
more of the performance measures
identified in section I.A of the FFO,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with targets. If it does not include these,
does it include well-formed, outcomebased performance measures, with
targets, and credibly demonstrate how
achieving these performance measure
targets will lead to increased targets for
one or more of the performance
measures in section I.A of the FFO; and
(d) If the proposal includes a way to
objectively determine its success at
achieving its outcomes.
3. Overall qualifications of applicants
(maximum 10 points).
This ascertains whether the applicant
possesses the necessary education,
experience, training, facilities, and
administrative resources to accomplish
the project. This includes their record of
achievement with previous funding.
4. Project costs (maximum 20 points).
The budget is evaluated to determine
if it is realistic and commensurate with
the project needs and time-frame. This
includes assessment of the described
plans for how the aquaculture extension
personnel capacity will be maintained
when funding from this competition
terminates.
5. Outreach and education (maximum
25 points).
Assesses whether this project
provides a focused and effective
education and outreach strategy
regarding NOAA’s mission to protect
the Nation’s natural resources. For this
competition, this ascertains if the
proposal includes a clear and objective
work plan for outreach strategy and
specific activities to maximize
dissemination of results to stakeholders.
Selection Procedures and Factors:
Upon receipt of a full application by
NOAA, an initial administrative review
will be conducted to determine
compliance with requirements and
completeness of the application. A merit
review will also be conducted to
produce a rank order of the proposals.
The NOAA Program Officer may
review the ranking of the proposals and
make recommendations to the Selecting
Official based on the administrative
and/or merit review(s) and selection
factors listed below. The Selecting
Official selects proposals after
considering the administrative and/or
merit review(s) and recommendations of
the Program Officer. In making the final
selections, the Selecting Official will
award in rank order unless the proposal
is justified to be selected out of rank
order based upon one or more of the
selection factors below. The Program
Officer and/or Selecting Official may
negotiate the funding level of the
proposal. The Selecting Official makes
final award recommendations to the
Grants Officer authorized to obligate the
funds.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
The selection factors that the
Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects
funded or considered for funding by
NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy
factors.
5. Applicant’s prior award
performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of
targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary
for NOAA staff to make a National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
determination and draft necessary
documentation before recommendations
for funding are made to the Grants
Officer.
Information Contacts: Agency contact
for information regarding the NOAA Sea
Grant Aquaculture Extension and
Technology Transfer 2010 should be
directed to Dr. Gene Kim, 301–734–
1281; via e-mail at
oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov;
Mailing Address: NOAA Sea Grant;
1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, R/SG;
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Eligibility: The following entities are
eligible to apply to this funding
opportunity: Sea Grant College
Programs, Sea Grant Institutional
Programs, the Guam Sea Grant Project,
the Lake Champlain Sea Grant Project,
and the Sea Grant National Law Center.
Other interested parties are
encouraged to work with the Sea Grant
programs in their region to explore
opportunities for partnering. Contact
information for all eligible state Sea
Grant programs can be found at https://
www.seagrant.noaa.gov/nsi/2010/
eligible_2010.htm or may also be
obtained by contacting the Information
Contact listed above.
Cost Sharing Requirements: NonFederal matching funds equal to at least
50 percent of the Federal funding
request must be provided. In-kind
contributions can count towards this
matching requirement.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under this Program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive
Species 2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea
Grant will make available $2,000,000 in
2010 and up to $2,000,000 in 2011, if
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
appropriations are available, to Sea
Grant programs to support integrated
projects of research, outreach,
extension, education and/or
management, addressing regional
aquatic invasive species priorities for
U.S. coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes
areas. The opportunity seeks especially
to support projects that address NOAArelevant regional aquatic invasive
species priorities identified by Sea
Grant Regional Research Plans, by
NOAA Regional Collaboration Teams,
by the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS)
Task Force Regional Panels, and in ANS
State Management Plans. The Federal
Funding Opportunity (FFO)
announcement for this competition is
available on https://grants.gov under
FFO number NOAA–OAR–SG–2010–
2002380.
Funding Availability: A total of
$2,000,000 of Federal Sea Grant funds
in FY 2010 and up to $2,000,000 in FY
2011 is anticipated to be offered,
depending on appropriations. Up to 11
awards are anticipated to be made,
depending the number, quality, and
request amounts of applications
received. Federal funding requests must
be no higher than $400,000 and no
lower than $20,000. An exception to the
$400,000 upper limit is if a single
integrated project addresses an invasive
species issue in multiple Sea Grant
regions. If this is done, the maximum
amount that can be requested is
$400,000 times the number of regions
involved.
Statutory Authority: Authority for this
FFO is provided by 33 U.S.C. 1121 et
seq., as amended.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea Grant
Support.
Application Deadline: Applications
must be received by 5 p.m. Eastern time
May 17, 2010. Applications that are not
received by the deadline will not be
reviewed.
Address for Submitting Proposals:
Applications should be submitted to
Grants.gov. Applicants who do not have
access to the Internet should request
submission information from the
Information Contact listed below.
Evaluation Criteria:
1. Importance and/or relevance and
applicability of proposed project to the
program goals (40 percent).
This ascertains whether there is
intrinsic value in the proposed work
and/or relevance to NOAA, Federal,
regional, State, or local activities. For
this competition, this criterion
ascertains:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19361
(a) Does the proposal address a
significant recognized regional aquatic
invasive species issue?
(b) If the proposed project is
successful, will it contribute
significantly to the resolution of this
issue?
(c) Does the proposal include a
concrete, unambiguous specific desired
outcome, and does the project have a
good chance of achieving that outcome
(including meeting stated performance
measure targets)?
2. Technical/scientific merit (40
percent).
This assesses whether the approach is
technically sound and/or innovative, if
the methods are appropriate, and
whether there are clear project goals and
objectives. For this competition, this
criterion assesses:
(a) The quality of the work plan,
including (if appropriate) plans for
identifying and selecting future research
or other future actions;
(b) Does the proposal include all
components (research, outreach,
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the
desired outcome? Is there an effective
plan for integrating all components?
(c) Does the proposal include one or
more of the performance measures
identified in section I.A of the FFO,
with targets? If it does not include these,
does it include well-formed, outcomebased performance measures, with
targets, and credibly demonstrate how
achieving these performance measure
targets will lead to increased targets for
one or more of the performance
measures in section I.A of the FFO?
(d) Does the proposal include a way
to objectively determine its success at
achieving its outcomes?
3. Overall qualifications of applicants
(5 percent).
This ascertains whether the applicant
possesses the necessary education,
experience, training, facilities, and
administrative resources to accomplish
the project. For this competition this
criterion ascertains whether the
proposed leader and team possess the
necessary education, experience,
breadth, facilities, and administrative
resources to accomplish the project.
4. Project costs (10 percent).
The Budget is evaluated to determine
if it is realistic and commensurate with
the project needs and time-frame. For
this competition, this criterion also
assesses the degree to which costs have
been minimized and inter-institutional
and partnership activities have been
incorporated in order to leverage funds
and resources.
5. Outreach and education (5 percent).
NOAA assesses whether this project
provides a focused and effective
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
19362
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
education and outreach strategy
regarding NOAA’s mission to protect
the Nation’s natural resources. For this
competition, this criterion assesses the
quality of proposed outreach and
education activities to contribute to
achieving the desired objective, as well
as to effectively communicate the
results of this project after it is
completed, to maximize its usefulness
in future similar efforts.
Selection Procedures and Factors:
Upon receipt of a full application by
NOAA, an initial administrative review
will be conducted to determine
compliance with requirements and
completeness of the application. A merit
review will also be conducted to
produce a rank order of the proposals.
The NOAA Program Officer may review
the ranking of the proposals and make
recommendations to the Selecting
Official based on the administrative
and/or merit review(s) and selection
factors listed below. The Selecting
Official selects proposals after
considering the administrative and/or
merit review(s) and recommendations of
the Program Officer. In making the final
selections, the Selecting Official will
award in rank order unless the proposal
is justified to be selected out of rank
order based upon one or more of the
selection factors below. The Program
Officer and/or Selecting Official may
negotiate the funding level of the
proposal. The Selecting Official makes
final award recommendations to the
Grants Officer authorized to obligate the
funds.
The selection factors that the
Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects
funded or considered for funding by
NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy
factors.
5. Applicant’s prior award
performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of
targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary
for NOAA staff to make a National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
determination and draft necessary
documentation before recommendations
for funding are made to the Grants
Officer.
Information Contact: Dorn Carlson,
National Sea Grant College Program,
1315 East-West Highway, R/SG, Rm
11710, Silver Spring, MD 20910; tel:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
(301) 713–1080; e-mail:
invasive.species@noaa.gov.
Eligibility: The following entities are
eligible to apply to this funding
opportunity: Sea Grant Colleges, Sea
Grant Institutional Programs, the Lake
Champlain Sea Grant Project, the Guam
Sea Grant Project, and the Sea Grant
National Law Center.
Other interested parties are
encouraged to work with the Sea Grant
programs in their region to explore
opportunities for partnering. Contact
information for all eligible state Sea
Grant programs and projects can be
found at https://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/
nsi/2010/eligible_2010.htm or may also
be obtained by contacting Dorn Carlson
listed in Agency Contacts.
Cost Sharing Requirements: Matching
funds equal to at least 50 percent of the
Federal funding request must be
provided.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
III. Relevant NOAA Mission Goal
Protect, Restore and Manage the Use of
Coastal and Ocean Resources Through
Ecosystem-Based Management
Coastal areas are among the most
developed in the Nation. More than half
the population lives on less than onefifth of the land in the contiguous
United States. Furthermore,
employment in near shore areas is
growing three times faster than
population. Coastal and marine waters
support over 28 million jobs and
provide a tourism destination for nearly
90 million Americans a year. The value
of the ocean economy to the United
States is over $115 billion. The value
added annually to the national economy
by the commercial and recreational
fishing industry alone is over $48
billion. U.S. aquaculture sales total
almost $1 billion annually. With its
Exclusive Economic Zone of 3.4 million
square miles, the United States manages
the largest marine territory of any nation
in the world.
Funded proposals should help
achieve the following outcomes:
1. Healthy and productive coastal and
marine ecosystems that benefit society.
2. A well-informed public that acts as
a steward of coastal and marine
ecosystems.
Program Names for this Mission Goal:
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture
Research Program 2010.
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture
Extension and Technology Transfer
2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive
Species 2010.
IV. Classification
Limitation of Liability
In no event will NOAA or the
Department of Commerce be responsible
for proposal preparation costs.
Publication of this announcement does
not oblige NOAA to award any specific
project or to obligate any available
funds.
Universal Identifier
For programs that have deadline dates
on or after October 1, 2003, applicants
should be aware that they may be
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number during the
application process. See the October 30,
2002 Federal Register, (67 FR 661770
for additional information.
Organizations can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1–866–705–5711 or via
the Internet (https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com).
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NOAA must analyze the potential
environmental impacts, as required by
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), for applicant projects or
proposals which are seeking NOAA
federal funding opportunities. Detailed
information on NOAA compliance with
NEPA can be found at the following
NOAA NEPA Web site: https://
www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including our
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6 for
NEPA, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/
NAO216_6_TOC.pdf, NEPA
Questionnaire, https://
www.nepa.noaa.gov/questionnaire.pdf,
and the Council on Environmental
Quality implementation regulations,
https://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/
toc— ceq.htm. Consequently, as part of
an applicant’s package, and under their
description of their program activities,
applicants are required to provide
detailed information on the activities to
be conducted, locations, sites, species
and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any
environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous
or toxic chemicals, introduction of nonindigenous species, impacts to
endangered and threatened species,
aquaculture projects, and impacts to
coral reef systems). In addition to
providing specific information that will
serve as the basis for any required
impact analyses, applicants may also be
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of
an environmental assessment, if NOAA
determines an assessment is required.
Applicants will also be required to
cooperate with NOAA in identifying
feasible measures to reduce or avoid any
identified adverse environmental
impacts of their proposal. The failure to
do so shall be grounds for not selecting
an application. In some cases if
additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be
withheld by the Grants Officer under a
special award condition requiring the
recipient to submit additional
environmental compliance information
sufficient to enable NOAA to make an
assessment on any impacts that a project
may have on the environment.
Compliance With Department of
Commerce Bureau of Industry and
Security Export Administration
Regulations
a. This section applies to the extent
that this notice results in financial
assistance awards involving access to
export-controlled information or
technology.
b. In performing a financial assistance
award, the recipient may gain access to
export-controlled information or
technology. The recipient will then be
responsible for compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations
regarding export-controlled information
and technology, including deemed
exports. The recipient shall establish
and maintain throughout performance
of the financial assistance award
effective export compliance procedures
at non-NOAA facilities. At a minimum,
these export compliance procedures
must include adequate controls of
physical, verbal, visual, and electronic
access to export- controlled information
and technology.
c. Definitions.
1. Deemed export. The Export
Administration Regulations (EAR)
define a deemed export as any release
of technology or source code subject to
the EAR to a foreign national, both in
the United States and abroad. Such
release is ‘‘deemed’’ to be an export to
the home country of the foreign
national. 15 CFR 734.2(b)(2)(ii).
2. Export-controlled information and
technology. Export-controlled
information and technology is
information and technology subject to
the EAR (15 CFR parts 730 et seq.),
implemented by the DOC Bureau of
Industry and Security, or the
International Traffic Arms Regulations
(ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120–130),
implemented by the Department of
State, respectively. This includes, but is
not limited to, dual-us items, defense
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
19363
articles and any related assistance,
services, software or technical data as
defined in the EAR and ITAR.
d. The recipient shall control access
to all export-controlled information and
technology that it possesses or that
comes into its possession in
performance of a financial assistance
award, to ensure that access is
restricted, or licensed, as required by
applicable Federal laws, Executive
Orders, and/or regulations.
e. Nothing in the terms of this section
is intended to change, supersede, or
waive any of the requirements of
applicable Federal laws, Executive
Orders or regulations.
f. The recipient shall include this
clause, including this paragraph (f), in
all lower tier transactions (subawards,
contracts, and subcontracts) under the
financial assistance award that may
involve access to export-controlled
information technology.
control numbers 4040–0004, 0348–0044,
0348–0040, 0348–0046, 0605–0001,
4040–0001, 4040–0003, and 4040–0005.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
NOAA implementation of Homeland
Security Presidential Directive—12
If the performance of a financial
assistance award, if approved by NOAA,
requires recipients to have physical
access to Federal premises for more than
180 days or access to a Federal
information system, any items or
services delivered under a financial
assistance award shall comply with the
Department of Commerce personal
identity verification procedures that
implement Homeland Security
Presidential Directive—12, FIPS PUB
201, and the Office of Management and
Budget Memorandum M–05–24. The
recipient shall insert this clause in all
subawards or contracts when the
subaward recipient or contractor is
required to have physical access to a
Federally controlled facility or access to
a Federal information system.
Prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law for rules concerning public
property, loans, grants, benefits, and
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). Because
notice and opportunity for comment are
not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
contained in the Federal Register notice
of February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696) are
applicable to this solicitation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B,
SF LLL, CD–346, SF 424 Research and
Related Family, SF 424 Short
Organizational Family, SF 424
Individual Form family has been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the respective
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Dated: April 9, 2010.
Terry Bevels,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, Office of
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–8545 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–PJ–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XV76
Endangered Species; File No. 14754
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Issuance of permit.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Isaac Wirgin, PhD, New York University
School of Medicine, Department of
Environmental Medicine, Tuxedo, NY
10987, has been issued a permit to take
shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19358-19363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8545]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 0907081109-0180-06]
RIN 0648-ZC10
Availability of Grant Funds for FY 2010
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of availability of grant funds for FY 2010.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NOAA publishes this notice to solicit proposals for grant
funding for three NOAA Sea Grant Programs: (1) Sea Grant Aquaculture
Research Program 2010; (2) NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and
Technology Transfer 2010; and (3) NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive
Species 2010. This notice supplements the agency's solicitation for
applications published on January 19, 2010 entitled ``Availability of
Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2010'' (75 FR 3209).
DATES: Proposals must be received by the date and time specified under
each program listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
ADDRESSES: Proposals must be submitted to the program address listed in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. NOAA's
discretionary grant fund notices may be found on the Internet at
Grants.gov. The URL for Grants.gov is https://www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For those applicants without Internet
access, you may request a copy of the full funding opportunity
announcement and/or application kit from the person listed as the
information contact under each program.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicants must comply with all requirements
contained in the Federal Funding Opportunity announcement for each of
the programs listed in this notice. The Federal Funding Opportunity
announcements are available at https://www.grants.gov.
The list of grant opportunities under NOAA Project Competitions
(below) describes the basic information and requirements for the
competitive grant/cooperative agreement programs offered by NOAA. These
programs are open to anyone who meets the eligibility criteria
specified under each entry. To be considered for an award under one of
the described competitive grant/cooperative agreement programs,
eligible applicants must submit a complete and responsive application
to the appropriate address by the deadline specified in this notice. An
award is made upon conclusion of the evaluation and selection process
for the respective program.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. NOAA Project Competitions--Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
(OAR)
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Program 2010
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and Technology Transfer
2010
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive Species 2010
III. Relevant NOAA Mission Goal
IV. Classification
I. Background
In this notice, NOAA announces that three programs are making funds
available for financial assistance awards. Each entry for the following
grant opportunities provides: A description of the program, funding
availability, statutory authority, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number, application deadline, address for submitting
proposals, selection criteria, evaluation criteria, information
contacts, eligibility requirements, cost sharing requirements, and
intergovernmental review under Executive Order 12372. Interested
applicants should consult the January 19, 2010 Federal Register Notice
entitled ``Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2010'' (75 FR
3209) for additional information about submitting an application to
NOAA.
II. NOAA Project Competitions
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR)
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Program 2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea Grant will make available up to
$6,000,000 for a national competition to fund aquaculture research
projects for FY 2010 to FY 2011, as part of the overall plan to support
the development of environmentally and economically sustainable ocean,
coastal or Great Lakes aquaculture. The Federal Funding Opportunity
(FFO) announcement for this competition is available on https://grants.gov under FFO number NOAA-OAR-SG-2010-2002488.
Funding Availability: Depending on FY 2011 Congressional
appropriations and the quality of proposals, Sea Grant expects to have
available up to $6,000,000 for aquaculture research projects for FY
2010 to FY 2011, with individual research projects funded at a total of
$50,000 to $400,000 in federal
[[Page 19359]]
funding (or $75,000 to $600,000 total funding, including required non-
Federal matching funds) for up to a two-year period. Additional match
may be applied, if appropriate. Given the anticipated amount of funding
and the anticipated number and quality of proposals submitted,
approximately 15 projects of average Federal funding of $400,000 are
anticipated.
Statutory Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1121 et seq.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea
Grant Support
Application Deadline: Proposals must be submitted by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, May 25, 2010, regardless of where they are submitted. State Sea
Grant Programs must forward applications unchanged to Grants.gov by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, June 8, 2010. Applications that are not
received by the deadline will not be reviewed.
Address for Submitting Proposals: Applicants from Sea Grant states
must submit applications to the addresses provided by the appropriate
State Sea Grant Program. Contact information for Sea Grant Programs is
available at https://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/nsi/2010/eligible_2010.htm
or may also be obtained by contacting the Information Contact listed
below.
Applicants NOT From Sea Grant States may submit their applications
to a nearby State Sea Grant Program office, or directly to Grants.gov
(by the same date that applicants in Sea Grant states must send to
their Sea Grant Program).
If submitted electronically via Grants.gov, please indicate FFO
number NOAA-OAR-SG-2010-2002488 in the application.
If a Sea Grant Program or an applicant not from a Sea Grant State
does not have proven internet access, contact the Information Contact
listed below for submission instructions.
Evaluation Criteria:
1. Importance and/or relevance and applicability of proposed
project to the National Sea Grant program goals (maximum 25 points).
This ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed
work and/or relevance to NOAA, Federal, regional, State, or local
activities. For this competition, this ascertains:
(a) If the impact of the proposed work will increase domestic
marine aquaculture production, contribute to environmental
sustainability, and advance the state of the industry, science, or
state-of the-art methods for marine aquaculture;
(b) The degree to which the proposal contributes to the following
three top priorities for FY 2010 and FY 2011:
(1) Research on technical aspects of innovative mitigation or
`smart design' approaches to aquaculture, such as integrated multi-
trophic aquaculture or other ways to design aquaculture production in
an ecosystem management context; (2) Development of planning tools or
approaches to aid site selection for new or expanded aquaculture
facilities in the context of coastal and marine spatial planning
efforts, including planning and zoning tools for coastal managers; and
(3) Research on the social and economic issues associated with current
and new marine aquaculture; and
(c) If the proposal includes a concrete, unambiguous specific
desired outcome, and has a good chance of achieving that outcome
(including meeting stated performance measure targets).
2. Technical/scientific merit (maximum 35 points).
This assesses whether the approach is technically sound and/or
innovative, if the methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear
project goals and objectives. For this competition, this ascertains:
(a) The quality of the work plan, and if it includes (if
appropriate) plans for identifying and conducting future research or
other future actions;
(b) If the proposal includes all components (research, outreach,
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the desired outcome and an
effective plan to integrate all components;
(c) If the proposal includes one or more of the performance
measures identified in section I.A of the FFO, with targets. If it does
not include these, does it include well-formed, outcome-based
performance measures, with targets, and credibly demonstrate how
achieving these performance measure targets will lead to increased
targets for one or more of the performance measures in section I.A of
the FFO; and
(d) If the proposal includes a way to objectively determine its
success at achieving its outcomes.
3. Overall qualifications of applicants (maximum 10 points).
This ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary
education, experience, training, facilities, and administrative
resources to accomplish the project. This includes their record of
achievement with previous funding.
4. Project costs (maximum 15 points).
The budget is evaluated to determine if it is realistic and
commensurate with the project needs and time-frame.
5. Outreach and education (maximum 15 points).
This criterion assesses whether this project provides a focused and
effective education and outreach strategy regarding NOAA's mission to
protect the Nation's natural resources. For this competition, this
ascertains if the proposal includes a clear and objective work plan for
outreach strategy and specific activities to maximize dissemination of
results to stakeholders.
Selection Procedures and Factors: Upon receipt of a full
application by NOAA, an initial administrative review will be conducted
to determine compliance with requirements and completeness of the
application. A merit review will also be conducted to produce a rank
order of the proposals. The NOAA Program Officer may review the ranking
of the proposals and make recommendations to the Selecting Official
based on the administrative and/or merit review(s) and selection
factors listed below. The Selecting Official selects proposals after
considering the administrative and/or merit review(s) and
recommendations of the Program Officer. In making the final selections,
the Selecting Official will award in rank order unless the proposal is
justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of
the selection factors below. The Program Officer and/or Selecting
Official may negotiate the funding level of the proposal. The Selecting
Official makes final award recommendations to the Grants Officer
authorized to obligate the funds.
The selection factors that the Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects funded or considered for funding
by NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy factors.
5. Applicant's prior award performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a
National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) determination and draft
necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to
the Grants Officer.
Information Contacts: Agency contact for information regarding the
NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Program 2010 should be directed to
Dr. Gene Kim, 301-734-1281; via e-mail at
oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov">oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov; Mailing Address: NOAA Sea Grant;
[[Page 19360]]
1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, R/SG; Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Eligibility: Institutions of higher education, nonprofit
organizations, commercial organizations, State, local and Indian tribal
governments and individuals are eligible. Federal agencies and their
personnel are not permitted to receive Federal funding under this
competition; however, Federal scientists can serve as partners or co-
Principal Investigators on research proposals. Directors of the state
Sea Grant Programs are not eligible to compete for funds under this
announcement, although for administrative purposes, they will be
considered to be the Principal Investigator for all awards made to
their state programs.
Cost Sharing Requirements: Non-Federal matching funds equal to at
least 50 percent of the Federal funding request must be provided. In-
kind contributions can count towards this matching requirement.
Intergovernmental Review: Applications under this Program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.''
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and Technology Transfer 2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea Grant will make available up to
$4,800,000 for a national competition to fund aquaculture extension
efforts for FY 2010 to FY 2012, as part of the overall plan to enhance
aquaculture extension (including technology transfer) to support the
development of environmentally and economically sustainable ocean,
coastal or Great Lakes aquaculture. Aquaculture extension is expected
to be conducted in cooperation and partnership with state and Federal
aquaculture agencies and regional management efforts. The Federal
Funding Opportunity (FFO) announcement for this competition is
available on https://grants.gov under FFO number NOAA-OAR-SG-2010-
2002491.
Funding Availability: Depending on FY 2011 and FY 2012
Congressional appropriations and the quality of proposals, Sea Grant
expects to have available up to $4,800,000 for aquaculture extension
efforts for FY 2010 to FY 2012. Each Sea Grant Program can submit up to
two separate proposals. Each individual proposal can be requested at a
total of $50,000 to $300,000 in Federal funding (or $75,000 to $450,000
total funding, including required non-Federal matching funds) for up to
a three-year period; however, the maximum annual amount for each
proposal is $100,000 in Federal funding per year. Given the anticipated
amount of funding and the anticipated number and quality of proposals
submitted, approximately 16 projects of average Federal funding
$300,000 are anticipated.
Statutory Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1121 et seq.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea
Grant Support.
Application Deadline: Proposals must be submitted by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, May 25, 2010. Applications that are not received by the deadline
will not be reviewed.
Address for Submitting Proposals: Proposals must be submitted
through Grants.gov by the Sea Grant Program. If an applicant does not
have internet access, contact the Information Contact listed below.
Evaluation Criteria:
1. Importance and/or relevance and applicability of proposed
project to the National Sea Grant program goals (maximum 25 points).
This ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed
work and/or relevance to NOAA, federal, regional, State, or local
activities. For this competition, this ascertains:
(a) The degree of impact of the proposed work to increase domestic
ocean, coastal or Great Lakes aquaculture production, contribute to
environmental sustainability, and advance the state of the industry,
science, or state-of the-art methods for marine aquaculture; and
(b) The degree to which the proposal includes a concrete,
unambiguous specific desired outcome, and has a good chance of
achieving that outcome (including meeting stated performance measure
targets).
2. Technical/scientific merit (maximum 20 points).
This assesses whether the approach is technically sound and/or
innovative, if the methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear
project goals and objectives. For this competition, this ascertains:
(a) The quality of the work plan, including (if appropriate) plans
for identifying and conducting future research, extension, or other
actions;
(b) If the proposal includes all components (research, outreach,
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the desired outcome. Is there an
effective plan for integrating all components?;
(c) If the proposal includes one or more of the performance
measures identified in section I.A of the FFO, with targets. If it does
not include these, does it include well-formed, outcome-based
performance measures, with targets, and credibly demonstrate how
achieving these performance measure targets will lead to increased
targets for one or more of the performance measures in section I.A of
the FFO; and
(d) If the proposal includes a way to objectively determine its
success at achieving its outcomes.
3. Overall qualifications of applicants (maximum 10 points).
This ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary
education, experience, training, facilities, and administrative
resources to accomplish the project. This includes their record of
achievement with previous funding.
4. Project costs (maximum 20 points).
The budget is evaluated to determine if it is realistic and
commensurate with the project needs and time-frame. This includes
assessment of the described plans for how the aquaculture extension
personnel capacity will be maintained when funding from this
competition terminates.
5. Outreach and education (maximum 25 points).
Assesses whether this project provides a focused and effective
education and outreach strategy regarding NOAA's mission to protect the
Nation's natural resources. For this competition, this ascertains if
the proposal includes a clear and objective work plan for outreach
strategy and specific activities to maximize dissemination of results
to stakeholders.
Selection Procedures and Factors: Upon receipt of a full
application by NOAA, an initial administrative review will be conducted
to determine compliance with requirements and completeness of the
application. A merit review will also be conducted to produce a rank
order of the proposals.
The NOAA Program Officer may review the ranking of the proposals
and make recommendations to the Selecting Official based on the
administrative and/or merit review(s) and selection factors listed
below. The Selecting Official selects proposals after considering the
administrative and/or merit review(s) and recommendations of the
Program Officer. In making the final selections, the Selecting Official
will award in rank order unless the proposal is justified to be
selected out of rank order based upon one or more of the selection
factors below. The Program Officer and/or Selecting Official may
negotiate the funding level of the proposal. The Selecting Official
makes final award recommendations to the Grants Officer authorized to
obligate the funds.
[[Page 19361]]
The selection factors that the Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects funded or considered for funding
by NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy factors.
5. Applicant's prior award performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a
National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) determination and draft
necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to
the Grants Officer.
Information Contacts: Agency contact for information regarding the
NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and Technology Transfer 2010
should be directed to Dr. Gene Kim, 301-734-1281; via e-mail at
oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov">oar.hq.sg.aquaculture@noaa.gov; Mailing Address: NOAA Sea Grant; 1315
East-West Highway, SSMC3, R/SG; Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Eligibility: The following entities are eligible to apply to this
funding opportunity: Sea Grant College Programs, Sea Grant
Institutional Programs, the Guam Sea Grant Project, the Lake Champlain
Sea Grant Project, and the Sea Grant National Law Center.
Other interested parties are encouraged to work with the Sea Grant
programs in their region to explore opportunities for partnering.
Contact information for all eligible state Sea Grant programs can be
found at https://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/nsi/2010/eligible_2010.htm or
may also be obtained by contacting the Information Contact listed
above.
Cost Sharing Requirements: Non-Federal matching funds equal to at
least 50 percent of the Federal funding request must be provided. In-
kind contributions can count towards this matching requirement.
Intergovernmental Review: Applications under this Program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.''
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive Species 2010
Summary Description: NOAA Sea Grant will make available $2,000,000
in 2010 and up to $2,000,000 in 2011, if appropriations are available,
to Sea Grant programs to support integrated projects of research,
outreach, extension, education and/or management, addressing regional
aquatic invasive species priorities for U.S. coastal, ocean, and Great
Lakes areas. The opportunity seeks especially to support projects that
address NOAA-relevant regional aquatic invasive species priorities
identified by Sea Grant Regional Research Plans, by NOAA Regional
Collaboration Teams, by the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Task Force
Regional Panels, and in ANS State Management Plans. The Federal Funding
Opportunity (FFO) announcement for this competition is available on
https://grants.gov under FFO number NOAA-OAR-SG-2010-2002380.
Funding Availability: A total of $2,000,000 of Federal Sea Grant
funds in FY 2010 and up to $2,000,000 in FY 2011 is anticipated to be
offered, depending on appropriations. Up to 11 awards are anticipated
to be made, depending the number, quality, and request amounts of
applications received. Federal funding requests must be no higher than
$400,000 and no lower than $20,000. An exception to the $400,000 upper
limit is if a single integrated project addresses an invasive species
issue in multiple Sea Grant regions. If this is done, the maximum
amount that can be requested is $400,000 times the number of regions
involved.
Statutory Authority: Authority for this FFO is provided by 33
U.S.C. 1121 et seq., as amended.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.417, Sea
Grant Support.
Application Deadline: Applications must be received by 5 p.m.
Eastern time May 17, 2010. Applications that are not received by the
deadline will not be reviewed.
Address for Submitting Proposals: Applications should be submitted
to Grants.gov. Applicants who do not have access to the Internet should
request submission information from the Information Contact listed
below.
Evaluation Criteria:
1. Importance and/or relevance and applicability of proposed
project to the program goals (40 percent).
This ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed
work and/or relevance to NOAA, Federal, regional, State, or local
activities. For this competition, this criterion ascertains:
(a) Does the proposal address a significant recognized regional
aquatic invasive species issue?
(b) If the proposed project is successful, will it contribute
significantly to the resolution of this issue?
(c) Does the proposal include a concrete, unambiguous specific
desired outcome, and does the project have a good chance of achieving
that outcome (including meeting stated performance measure targets)?
2. Technical/scientific merit (40 percent).
This assesses whether the approach is technically sound and/or
innovative, if the methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear
project goals and objectives. For this competition, this criterion
assesses:
(a) The quality of the work plan, including (if appropriate) plans
for identifying and selecting future research or other future actions;
(b) Does the proposal include all components (research, outreach,
extension, etc) necessary to achieve the desired outcome? Is there an
effective plan for integrating all components?
(c) Does the proposal include one or more of the performance
measures identified in section I.A of the FFO, with targets? If it does
not include these, does it include well-formed, outcome-based
performance measures, with targets, and credibly demonstrate how
achieving these performance measure targets will lead to increased
targets for one or more of the performance measures in section I.A of
the FFO?
(d) Does the proposal include a way to objectively determine its
success at achieving its outcomes?
3. Overall qualifications of applicants (5 percent).
This ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary
education, experience, training, facilities, and administrative
resources to accomplish the project. For this competition this
criterion ascertains whether the proposed leader and team possess the
necessary education, experience, breadth, facilities, and
administrative resources to accomplish the project.
4. Project costs (10 percent).
The Budget is evaluated to determine if it is realistic and
commensurate with the project needs and time-frame. For this
competition, this criterion also assesses the degree to which costs
have been minimized and inter-institutional and partnership activities
have been incorporated in order to leverage funds and resources.
5. Outreach and education (5 percent).
NOAA assesses whether this project provides a focused and effective
[[Page 19362]]
education and outreach strategy regarding NOAA's mission to protect the
Nation's natural resources. For this competition, this criterion
assesses the quality of proposed outreach and education activities to
contribute to achieving the desired objective, as well as to
effectively communicate the results of this project after it is
completed, to maximize its usefulness in future similar efforts.
Selection Procedures and Factors: Upon receipt of a full
application by NOAA, an initial administrative review will be conducted
to determine compliance with requirements and completeness of the
application. A merit review will also be conducted to produce a rank
order of the proposals. The NOAA Program Officer may review the ranking
of the proposals and make recommendations to the Selecting Official
based on the administrative and/or merit review(s) and selection
factors listed below. The Selecting Official selects proposals after
considering the administrative and/or merit review(s) and
recommendations of the Program Officer. In making the final selections,
the Selecting Official will award in rank order unless the proposal is
justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of
the selection factors below. The Program Officer and/or Selecting
Official may negotiate the funding level of the proposal. The Selecting
Official makes final award recommendations to the Grants Officer
authorized to obligate the funds.
The selection factors that the Selecting Official may use are:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance and distribution of funds.
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Duplication of other projects funded or considered for funding
by NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy factors.
5. Applicant's prior award performance.
6. Partnerships and/or Participation of targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a
National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) determination and draft
necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to
the Grants Officer.
Information Contact: Dorn Carlson, National Sea Grant College
Program, 1315 East-West Highway, R/SG, Rm 11710, Silver Spring, MD
20910; tel: (301) 713-1080; e-mail: invasive.species@noaa.gov.
Eligibility: The following entities are eligible to apply to this
funding opportunity: Sea Grant Colleges, Sea Grant Institutional
Programs, the Lake Champlain Sea Grant Project, the Guam Sea Grant
Project, and the Sea Grant National Law Center.
Other interested parties are encouraged to work with the Sea Grant
programs in their region to explore opportunities for partnering.
Contact information for all eligible state Sea Grant programs and
projects can be found at https://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/nsi/2010/eligible_2010.htm or may also be obtained by contacting Dorn Carlson
listed in Agency Contacts.
Cost Sharing Requirements: Matching funds equal to at least 50
percent of the Federal funding request must be provided.
Intergovernmental Review: Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.''
III. Relevant NOAA Mission Goal
Protect, Restore and Manage the Use of Coastal and Ocean Resources
Through Ecosystem-Based Management
Coastal areas are among the most developed in the Nation. More than
half the population lives on less than one-fifth of the land in the
contiguous United States. Furthermore, employment in near shore areas
is growing three times faster than population. Coastal and marine
waters support over 28 million jobs and provide a tourism destination
for nearly 90 million Americans a year. The value of the ocean economy
to the United States is over $115 billion. The value added annually to
the national economy by the commercial and recreational fishing
industry alone is over $48 billion. U.S. aquaculture sales total almost
$1 billion annually. With its Exclusive Economic Zone of 3.4 million
square miles, the United States manages the largest marine territory of
any nation in the world.
Funded proposals should help achieve the following outcomes:
1. Healthy and productive coastal and marine ecosystems that
benefit society.
2. A well-informed public that acts as a steward of coastal and
marine ecosystems.
Program Names for this Mission Goal:
1. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Program 2010.
2. NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and Technology Transfer
2010.
3. NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive Species 2010.
IV. Classification
Limitation of Liability
In no event will NOAA or the Department of Commerce be responsible
for proposal preparation costs. Publication of this announcement does
not oblige NOAA to award any specific project or to obligate any
available funds.
Universal Identifier
For programs that have deadline dates on or after October 1, 2003,
applicants should be aware that they may be required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number during the
application process. See the October 30, 2002 Federal Register, (67 FR
661770 for additional information. Organizations can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1-866-705-5711 or via the Internet (https://www.dunandbradstreet.com).
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NOAA must analyze the potential environmental impacts, as required
by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant projects
or proposals which are seeking NOAA federal funding opportunities.
Detailed information on NOAA compliance with NEPA can be found at the
following NOAA NEPA Web site: https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including our
NOAA Administrative Order 216-6 for NEPA, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/NAO216_6_TOC.pdf, NEPA Questionnaire, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/questionnaire.pdf, and the Council on Environmental Quality
implementation regulations, https://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc--
ceq.htm. Consequently, as part of an applicant's package, and under
their description of their program activities, applicants are required
to provide detailed information on the activities to be conducted,
locations, sites, species and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals,
introduction of non-indigenous species, impacts to endangered and
threatened species, aquaculture projects, and impacts to coral reef
systems). In addition to providing specific information that will serve
as the basis for any required impact analyses, applicants may also be
[[Page 19363]]
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of an environmental assessment, if
NOAA determines an assessment is required. Applicants will also be
required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying feasible measures to
reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their
proposal. The failure to do so shall be grounds for not selecting an
application. In some cases if additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be withheld by the Grants Officer
under a special award condition requiring the recipient to submit
additional environmental compliance information sufficient to enable
NOAA to make an assessment on any impacts that a project may have on
the environment.
Compliance With Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security
Export Administration Regulations
a. This section applies to the extent that this notice results in
financial assistance awards involving access to export-controlled
information or technology.
b. In performing a financial assistance award, the recipient may
gain access to export-controlled information or technology. The
recipient will then be responsible for compliance with all applicable
laws and regulations regarding export-controlled information and
technology, including deemed exports. The recipient shall establish and
maintain throughout performance of the financial assistance award
effective export compliance procedures at non-NOAA facilities. At a
minimum, these export compliance procedures must include adequate
controls of physical, verbal, visual, and electronic access to export-
controlled information and technology.
c. Definitions.
1. Deemed export. The Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
define a deemed export as any release of technology or source code
subject to the EAR to a foreign national, both in the United States and
abroad. Such release is ``deemed'' to be an export to the home country
of the foreign national. 15 CFR 734.2(b)(2)(ii).
2. Export-controlled information and technology. Export-controlled
information and technology is information and technology subject to the
EAR (15 CFR parts 730 et seq.), implemented by the DOC Bureau of
Industry and Security, or the International Traffic Arms Regulations
(ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120-130), implemented by the Department of State,
respectively. This includes, but is not limited to, dual-us items,
defense articles and any related assistance, services, software or
technical data as defined in the EAR and ITAR.
d. The recipient shall control access to all export-controlled
information and technology that it possesses or that comes into its
possession in performance of a financial assistance award, to ensure
that access is restricted, or licensed, as required by applicable
Federal laws, Executive Orders, and/or regulations.
e. Nothing in the terms of this section is intended to change,
supersede, or waive any of the requirements of applicable Federal laws,
Executive Orders or regulations.
f. The recipient shall include this clause, including this
paragraph (f), in all lower tier transactions (subawards, contracts,
and subcontracts) under the financial assistance award that may involve
access to export-controlled information technology.
NOAA implementation of Homeland Security Presidential Directive--12
If the performance of a financial assistance award, if approved by
NOAA, requires recipients to have physical access to Federal premises
for more than 180 days or access to a Federal information system, any
items or services delivered under a financial assistance award shall
comply with the Department of Commerce personal identity verification
procedures that implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive--12,
FIPS PUB 201, and the Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-05-
24. The recipient shall insert this clause in all subawards or
contracts when the subaward recipient or contractor is required to have
physical access to a Federally controlled facility or access to a
Federal information system.
The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements contained in the Federal Register
notice of February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696) are applicable to this
solicitation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The use of Standard Forms
424, 424A, 424B, SF LLL, CD-346, SF 424 Research and Related Family, SF
424 Short Organizational Family, SF 424 Individual Form family has been
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
respective control numbers 4040-0004, 0348-0044, 0348-0040, 0348-0046,
0605-0001, 4040-0001, 4040-0003, and 4040-0005.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be not significant for purposes
of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
It has been determined that this notice does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required
by the Administrative Procedure Act or any other law for rules
concerning public property, loans, grants, benefits, and contracts (5
U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). Because notice and opportunity for comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis has not
been prepared.
Dated: April 9, 2010.
Terry Bevels,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-8545 Filed 4-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-PJ-P