Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Adoption of the FDA Food Code by Local, State, and Tribal Governments, 19405-19406 [2010-8510]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
FY 2011 reporting year and thereafter,
while the current reporting, OMB
Approval Number 0985–0008, will be
extended to the end of the FY 2010
reporting cycle. The proposed FY 2011
version may be found on the AoA web
site link entitled Proposed SPR for
Review available at https://www.aoa.gov/
AoARoot/Program_Results/docs/SPRDraft_form_2010_draft.pdf.
AoA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
2,828 hours
Dated: April 8, 2010.
Kathy Greenlee,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2010–8482 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0180]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adoption of the
FDA Food Code by Local, State, and
Tribal Governments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
FDA’s collection of information from
local, State, and tribal governmental
agencies concerning their adoption of,
or plans to adopt, all or portions of the
FDA Food Code or its equivalent by
regulation, law, or ordinance.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by June 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Adoption of the FDA Food Code by
Local, State, and Tribal Governments—
42 U.S.C. 243 (a); (OMB Control
Number 0910–0448)—Extension
FDA has developed its model Food
Code to assist and promote consistent
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19405
implementation of national food safety
regulatory policy among the local, State,
and tribal governmental agencies that
have primary responsibility for the
regulation or oversight of retail level
food operations. The FDA Food Code
provides a scientifically sound technical
and legal basis for regulating the retail
segment of the food industry. Authority
for providing such assistance is derived
from section 311(a) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243(a)). Under 31
U.S.C. 1535, FDA provides assistance to
other Federal agencies such as the
Indian Health Service (IHS).
Nationwide adoption of the model
FDA Food Code is an important step
toward the agency’s goal for consistent,
scientifically sound, and risk-based food
safety standards and practices. A
current, comprehensive, and accurate
inventory of food code adoptions by
States and U.S. territories, local, and
tribal governments is necessary to
determine the status of up-to-date
protection of the U.S. population and to
identify areas where assistance to these
governments may promote the adoption
of regulations based on the FDA Food
Code.
This collection effort, which began in
2001, has had remarkable success with
97 percent participation from State and
territorial governmental agencies. FDA
contracted with the Association of Food
and Drug Officials (AFDO) to conduct
the initial survey using the OMB
approved survey form. The rulemaking
process that local, State, territorial, and
tribal governmental agencies must
follow to adopt the model FDA Food
Code is often a long and complicated
process that can extend for several
years. For this reason, many agencies
have reported that they are still in the
rulemaking process to adopt or update
their food codes. Thus, FDA believes
that extension of OMB approval of the
survey is needed in order to keep the
current database accurate and up-todate. The contractor will collect the
information electronically and/or
telephonically and will be able to
provide respondents with previous
survey responses already in the
database.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to this information
collection are States and U.S. territories,
local, and tribal governmental agencies.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
19406
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Food Code Survey
Respondents
1 There
75
Dated: April 9, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–8510 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–E–0413]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AFINITOR
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Total Annual
Responses
4
Hours per
Response
300
Total Hours
1
300
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
This estimate is based on FDA’s
experience and the number of updates
received in the past 3 years. FDA
estimates that 75 respondents will
provide four quarterly updates each,
resulting in an estimated 300 total
annual responses. The agency estimates
that each quarterly update will take
about 1 hour. Of the 75 respondents,
those who amend their regulations with
changes unrelated to the risk factors and
interventions, and those who are not
adopting model FDA Food Code
provisions, but are incorporating certain
Conference for Food Protection
recommendations only, will likely need
only annual contact.
AGENCY:
Annual Frequency per
Response
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
AFINITOR and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:27 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product AFINITOR
(everolimus). AFINITOR is indicated for
treatment of patients with advanced
renal cell carcinoma after failure of
treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
AFINITOR (U.S. Patent No. 5,665,772)
from Novartis AG, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated September 2, 2009, FDA
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of AFINITOR
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
AFINITOR is 4,486 days. Of this time,
4,212 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 274 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: December 19,
1996. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new drug application became effective
was on December 19, 1996.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: June 30, 2008. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the new drug application (NDA) 22–334
was submitted on June 30, 2008.
3. The date the application was
approved: March 30, 2009. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–334 was approved on March 30,
2009.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,826 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 14, 2010.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 12, 2010. To meet its burden,
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19405-19406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8510]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0180]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adoption of the FDA Food Code by Local, State, and
Tribal Governments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on FDA's collection of
information from local, State, and tribal governmental agencies
concerning their adoption of, or plans to adopt, all or portions of the
FDA Food Code or its equivalent by regulation, law, or ordinance.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by June 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Adoption of the FDA Food Code by Local, State, and Tribal Governments--
42 U.S.C. 243 (a); (OMB Control Number 0910-0448)--Extension
FDA has developed its model Food Code to assist and promote
consistent implementation of national food safety regulatory policy
among the local, State, and tribal governmental agencies that have
primary responsibility for the regulation or oversight of retail level
food operations. The FDA Food Code provides a scientifically sound
technical and legal basis for regulating the retail segment of the food
industry. Authority for providing such assistance is derived from
section 311(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243(a)).
Under 31 U.S.C. 1535, FDA provides assistance to other Federal agencies
such as the Indian Health Service (IHS).
Nationwide adoption of the model FDA Food Code is an important step
toward the agency's goal for consistent, scientifically sound, and
risk-based food safety standards and practices. A current,
comprehensive, and accurate inventory of food code adoptions by States
and U.S. territories, local, and tribal governments is necessary to
determine the status of up-to-date protection of the U.S. population
and to identify areas where assistance to these governments may promote
the adoption of regulations based on the FDA Food Code.
This collection effort, which began in 2001, has had remarkable
success with 97 percent participation from State and territorial
governmental agencies. FDA contracted with the Association of Food and
Drug Officials (AFDO) to conduct the initial survey using the OMB
approved survey form. The rulemaking process that local, State,
territorial, and tribal governmental agencies must follow to adopt the
model FDA Food Code is often a long and complicated process that can
extend for several years. For this reason, many agencies have reported
that they are still in the rulemaking process to adopt or update their
food codes. Thus, FDA believes that extension of OMB approval of the
survey is needed in order to keep the current database accurate and up-
to-date. The contractor will collect the information electronically
and/or telephonically and will be able to provide respondents with
previous survey responses already in the database.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this information
collection are States and U.S. territories, local, and tribal
governmental agencies.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 19406]]
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency per Total Annual Hours per
Food Code Survey Respondents Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents 75 4 300 1 300
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
This estimate is based on FDA's experience and the number of
updates received in the past 3 years. FDA estimates that 75 respondents
will provide four quarterly updates each, resulting in an estimated 300
total annual responses. The agency estimates that each quarterly update
will take about 1 hour. Of the 75 respondents, those who amend their
regulations with changes unrelated to the risk factors and
interventions, and those who are not adopting model FDA Food Code
provisions, but are incorporating certain Conference for Food
Protection recommendations only, will likely need only annual contact.
Dated: April 9, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-8510 Filed 4-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S