Safety Zone; BWRC Spring Classic, Parker, AZ, 19250-19252 [2010-8479]
Download as PDF
19250
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishment of a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
2. Add § 165.T11–304 to read as
follows:
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
16:13 Apr 13, 2010
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
■
Technical Standards
VerDate Nov<24>2008
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Jkt 220001
§ 165.T11–304 Safety zone; Sea World
Summer Nights Fireworks; Mission Bay,
San Diego, California.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include a 600 foot radius
around the barge in approximate
position 32°46′03″ N, 117°13′11″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 8:50 p.m. to 10
p.m. on March 27, 2010 through
September 6, 2010. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Sector San Diego Command Center. The
Command Center may be contacted on
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
Dated: March 29, 2010.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010–8530 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. USCG–2009–1111]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; BWRC Spring Classic,
Parker, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
within the Lake Moolvalya region of the
navigable waters of the Colorado River
in Parker, Arizona for the Blue Water
Resort and Casino Spring Classic. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on April 16, 2010 through 6 p.m. on
April 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
1111 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2009–1111 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Shane
Jackson, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast
Guard; telephone 619–278–7267, e-mail
Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of vessels, spectators,
participants, and others in the vicinity
of the marine event on the dates and
times this rule will be in effect and
delay would be contrary to the public
interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the public
interest, since immediate action is
needed to ensure the public’s safety.
Background and Purpose
The Southern California Speedboat
Club is sponsoring the Blue Water
Resort and Casino Spring Classic, which
is held on the Lake Moolvalya region on
the Colorado River in Parker, Arizona. A
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other users and vessels of
the waterway. This event involves
powerboats racing along a circular
course. The size of the boats vary from
10 to 21 feet in length. Approximately
70 to 100 boats will be participating in
this event. Additionally, the sponsor
will provide two patrol and rescue boats
and two river closure boats.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced from 6
a.m. on April 16, 2010 through 6 p.m.
on April 18, 2010. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, participants, and
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring with this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative. This
temporary safety zone will encompass
the entire width of the Colorado River
from Headgate Dam to 0.5 miles north
of Blue Water Marina, Parker, Arizona.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will publish a local notice to
mariners (LNM).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:13 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
19251
Regulatory Analyses
Assistance for Small Entities
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. This determination is
based on the size and location of the
safety zone. Commercial vessels will not
be hindered by the safety zone due to
its brief duration. Furthermore, all
vessels will be allowed to transit
through the established safety zone
during the specified times if authorized
to do so by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Colorado
River from 6 a.m. on April 16, 2009
through 6 p.m. April 18, 2010.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Although the
safety zone would apply to the entire
width of the river, traffic would be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Coast Guard patrol
commander. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish a local
notice to mariners (LNM).
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
19252
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:13 Apr 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–296 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–296 Safety zone; BWRC Spring
Classic, Parker, AZ
(a) Location. The limits of this
temporary safety zone include all areas
of the Colorado River from Headgate
Dam to 0.5 miles north of the Bluewater
Marine in Parker, Arizona.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6 a.m. on April
16, 2010 to 6 p.m. on April 18, 2010. If
the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Captain
of the Port will cease enforcement of
this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on VHF–
FM Channel 83.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
Dated: March 27, 2010.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010–8479 Filed 4–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63
[EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0851; FRL–9137–2]
Delegation of New Source
Performance Standards and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for the State of Louisiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of
authority.
SUMMARY: The Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ) has
submitted updated regulations for
receiving delegation of EPA authority
for implementation and enforcement of
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAPs) for all sources. These
regulations apply to certain NSPS
promulgated by EPA, as amended
through July 1, 2008; and certain
NESHAPs promulgated by EPA, as
amended through July 1, 2008. The
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 14, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19250-19252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8479]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-1111]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; BWRC Spring Classic, Parker, AZ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone within
the Lake Moolvalya region of the navigable waters of the Colorado River
in Parker, Arizona for the Blue Water Resort and Casino Spring Classic.
This temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of
the participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels, and other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on April 16, 2010 through 6
p.m. on April 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-1111 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2009-1111 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Shane Jackson, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone
619-278-7267, e-mail Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act
[[Page 19251]]
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a
rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency
for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels, spectators, participants, and others in the vicinity of the
marine event on the dates and times this rule will be in effect and
delay would be contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is
needed to ensure the public's safety.
Background and Purpose
The Southern California Speedboat Club is sponsoring the Blue Water
Resort and Casino Spring Classic, which is held on the Lake Moolvalya
region on the Colorado River in Parker, Arizona. A temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users and vessels of the
waterway. This event involves powerboats racing along a circular
course. The size of the boats vary from 10 to 21 feet in length.
Approximately 70 to 100 boats will be participating in this event.
Additionally, the sponsor will provide two patrol and rescue boats and
two river closure boats.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
from 6 a.m. on April 16, 2010 through 6 p.m. on April 18, 2010. This
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crews,
spectators, participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring with this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. This temporary
safety zone will encompass the entire width of the Colorado River from
Headgate Dam to 0.5 miles north of Blue Water Marina, Parker, Arizona.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a local
notice to mariners (LNM).
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This
determination is based on the size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone due to its
brief duration. Furthermore, all vessels will be allowed to transit
through the established safety zone during the specified times if
authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Colorado River from
6 a.m. on April 16, 2009 through 6 p.m. April 18, 2010.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Although the safety zone would apply to the entire width of the river,
traffic would be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission
of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
[[Page 19252]]
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-296 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-296 Safety zone; BWRC Spring Classic, Parker, AZ
(a) Location. The limits of this temporary safety zone include all
areas of the Colorado River from Headgate Dam to 0.5 miles north of the
Bluewater Marine in Parker, Arizona.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
on April 16, 2010 to 6 p.m. on April 18, 2010. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will
cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 83.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or
local agencies.
Dated: March 27, 2010.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2010-8479 Filed 4-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P